ML19345A025
| ML19345A025 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Marble Hill |
| Issue date: | 08/05/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345A022 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-546-80-23, 50-547-80-23, 50-547-80-231, NUDOCS 8009150600 | |
| Download: ML19345A025 (1) | |
Text
-
,a t
?
v Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Public Service of Docket No. 50-546 Indiana Docket No. 50-547 Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on June 10-12, 16-20, and 26-27, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not being conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as noted below. The following item is an infraction.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires in part that activities affect-ing quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, procedures or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative or qualititative criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.
The Marble Hill PSAR, Section 17.1.5 states in part, that, " PSI requires each contracting organization to develop and implement written instructions, procedures, or drawings for performance of all quality-related activities, including quality assurance or quality control audits of internal and external functions."
Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to follow procedures in the implementation of Special Process Procedure - 7 (SPP-7), PROCEDURE FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION AND VERIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED PURCHASED ITEMS, as described below:
Inspectors failed to obtain the proper test equipment prior to performing a.
the inspection.
b.
The checklists did not contain the following information as required by the procedure:
specification revision number; purchase order number; srpplier and/or manufacturer, and the quantity of items, c.
When exceptions to an original checklist were taken, the exceptions and the basis for such, were not documented on the checklist, and the exceptions were not approved by the Manager Quality Engineering, as required by the procedure.
80081se 6 c>o
_ _. _.. ~.
__