ML19344F507
| ML19344F507 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19344F504 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-482-80-15, NUDOCS 8009150345 | |
| Download: ML19344F507 (2) | |
Text
.
y.;
.Q STN 50-482/80-15 4 _
Appendix A t
NOTICE OF VIOI.ATION Based on the<results of-the NRC inspection conducted during June 30-July 3, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance
.with~ the conditions of your NRC Construction' Pennit No. CPPR-147 as indicated
-below:
Failure to-Provide Appropriate Procedures for Activities Affecting Quality 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion-V requires that documented procedures shall be appropriate to the circumstances for activities affecting quality.
Regulatory Guide 1.:
,. Position 4 requires that pertinent-quality assurance
-requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 should be applied to all activities affecting the safety-related functions of those portions of structures, systems,'or components whose continued function is'not required, but whose failure'could reduce the functioning of a safety-related function.
-Contrary to the above:
A review of the following Daniel procedures for installation and inspec-tion of cable raceway and raceway supports revealed that these procedures do not appropriately address the activities associated with II/I supports and raceway:
WP-X-300, Rev. 5, " Installation of Electrical Raceway" WP-X-302, Rev. 3,.." Installation of Electrical Raceway Supports" QCP-X-300, Rev. 4, " Installation of Electrical Raceway"
.i
'Specifically:
1.
WP-X-300, paragraph 4.1.9 requires that-copies of work assignments for Class IE:and II/I be sent to QC. However, the work assignment sheet (Exhibit A) does not -provide provisions for the identification of II/I raceway.
The rework assignment (Exhibit D) does provide 7
l
~for II/I raceway identification.'
2.
'With the exception of paragraph 4.1.9 and Exhibit D, WP-X-300 does
.not address II/I raceway 'with regards to documentation of records storage or: retention.
3.
-WP-X-302, paragraph 3.23_ requires QC inspection of II/I supports via a raceway; installation card' marked with the symbol II/I.
- However, WP-X-300 paragraph 4.1'.18, which requires the raceway installation
. card for-Class IE, does not address II/I.
8 009150)f f 4
'm
,.~.-,.A.,
.-.,,-.e.
n.
.., ++
4 a
',y 4,- q
4.
WP-X-302, paragraph 3.12 requires that QC inspect Class IE and II/I supports, but the work assignment (Exhibit B) does not require the
' identification of-II/I raceway supports. The rework assignment (Exhibit D) does provide for II/I raceway support identification.
5.
QCP-X-300 does not address II/I raceway, even chough there exists a requirement for_QC to receive II/I raceway installation cards, and II/I work assignments for notification of final or in process inspec-tion requirements of WP-X-300 and WP-X-302.
The above are examples of failure to provide appropriate procedures for activities affecting grality as required by Appendix B, 10 CFR 50.
This is an infraction.
1 m
9 r
e A
- t y
r-
,p.
m--
,..y
,.