ML19344F264

Request for Extension Until 10 Days After Responses to Ucs 800805 Motion Re Summary Judgment,For Ucs to File Direct Testimony on Contention 5.Contention Does Not Relate to Safety Issues & Has No Hearing Impact.W/Certificate of Svc

ML19344F264
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	09/10/1980
From:	Weiss E SHELDON, HARMON & WEISS, UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8009150041
Download: ML19344F264 (3)

Text

1. ".

G Y l0, j (! CO s o b 3, s, h

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 6 :CCKEE0

\

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y t;sNF.C BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 9" SEP O G h-p.

M Clf.c ci da UN Q ,

Czans:Ahms,Q;,

L Snnch 'sp /,

) G/ C' S

In the Matter of )

)

METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, ) Docket No. 50-289 et al., )

)

(Three Mile Island Nuclear )

S ta tion , Unit No. 1) )

)

UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DIRECT TESTIMONY ON CONTENTION 5 On August 5, 1980, UCS filed a motion for summary judgment on UCS Contentions No. 5 and 13. The Board's Order of August 20, while noting an inclination to require the filing of responses to the UCS motion, did not order them. UCS subsequently requested the Boarc to order responses to Contention No. 5 by September 10, so that we would be able to use them in preparing our testimony.

Union of Concerned Scientist. Response to Board Order of August 20, 1980 (Aug. 29, 1980).

Since the Board has not yet ruled, UCS hereby requests an extension of time to file direct testimony on Contention No. 5 until 10 days after responses to our summary judgment motion on that contention are received. As we have previously argued, -1/ UCS is entitled to responses and requires them in 1/ See Letter from UCS to the Board, August 19, 1980.

$)4. #5 C

8%elaocq,  !!6

,c ,

t-order to prepare our case. Since Contention No. 5 does not fall within the first grouping of design-related issues,2/ -

-this extension should have no impact on the hearing schedule.

Respectfully submitted, .

/,,. .

~{* j j f - ,-

Eflyn R. Weiss ~

HARMON~& WEISS 1725 I Street, N.W.,' Suite 506 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 833-9070 Council for the Union of Concerned Scientists DATED: September 10, 1980 2/ See Memorandum from G.F. Trowbridge to All Parties in TMI-l Restart Hearing, July 18, 1980, Attachment 3.

c .

e

@ 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p 0 000:fsr e BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD- -

w '.T MO h -

Sj 't

_ _7 10 fGO C E ; M it.'.3 h .ry . x .

y C.fQ{ Sr;:: . 4. ~

) " ' ~ ^

In the Matter of )  %

c

. ~,

).

METROPOLITAN EDISON ) Docket No. 50-289 COMPANY, et _al.,- ) '(Restart)

)

(Three' Mile Island )

Nuclear Station, Unit )

No. 1) )

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

- I.hereby certify that on this 10th day of September, 1980 a copy.of.the Union of Concerned Scientists Request for Extension of. Time To File Direct Testimony on Contention '5 was hand-delivered to the following parties:

t I

-l

• Secretary of.the Commission Dr. Linda W. Little 5000' Hermitage Drive

l ATTN: Chief, Docketing & Service Raleigh, North Carolina 27t i Section

' U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission , George F. Trowbridge, Esq.

Washington, D.C. 20555 Shaw, Pittman, Potts &

• Ivan W. Smith, Esquire Trowbridge i 1800 "M" Street, N.W.

Atomic Safety ~& Licensing Board Washington, D.C. 20006 j Panel

i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commis.,'"

• James Tourtellotte, Esq.

' Washington, D.C. 20555 Office of the Executive Legal Director

' Dr. Walter H. Jordan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

' 881 W. Outer Drive Commission Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 t- Washington, D.C. 20555 z ,- >

,. , l u ,, -

n.

w. .

t Elly'n R. Weiss e

- -. . , , , . , . -. -