ML19344E527

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Satisfactory Review of Encl Army Corps of Engineers Ltr Rept Re Geotechnical Engineering Review.Requests Rept Be Submitted to Util for Response
ML19344E527
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 08/05/1980
From: Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19344E528 List:
References
NUDOCS 8009020173
Download: ML19344E527 (2)


Text

-_

a..a '

., s p; g 5,-- n - -

. r-c.y AUG 5

1980, MEMORANDUM FOR:

A. Schwencer, Acting Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing THRU:

James P. Knight, Assistant Director for Components and Structures Engineering Division of Engineering FROM:

George Lear, Chief Hydrulogic and Geotechnical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

TRANSMITTAL OF U..S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS LETTER REPORT -

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERIfiG REVIEW (TAC N0. 5077) l PLANT NA'1E:

Midland Plants, Units 1 and 2 LICE 3 SING STAGE: Post CP DOCKET NUMBERS: 50-329/330 RESPONSIBLE BRANCH: Lic. Br. No. 3; D. Hood, LPf1 REQUESTED COMPLETION DATE: N/A REVIEW STATUS: Continuing The NRC Geotechnical Consultant, Corps of Engineers, Detroit District, has submitted a letter report which sumarizes their review efforts to date for the Midland project, identifies unresolved issues and makes recormendations for resolving these matters. The July 7,1980 letter report was submitted as an enclosure to the July 10, 1980 transmittal letter from Z. Goodwin, Chief, Engr. Div., NCD, COE, to R. Jackson, ilRC.

We have reviewed the Corps report and have found it to be a thorough effort in identifying the problem areas including specific requests for the infor-mation needed to resolve the identified matters. The Corps report should assist. NRC in preparation for upcoming safety hearings.

e n\\

  • me= *

/

~

-.v. a = =

  • om >

rec roax ne <s.763 xacx 024o 800902019%

A

s.

A. Schwencer MG5 1980 j

We request that the contents of the July 7, 1980 letter report (enclosure 1) from the Corps be submitted to Consumers Power Company (CPCo) for their response.

In addition, we request that enclosure 2 also be provided to CPCo as a supplement to the letter report. Enclosure 2 clarifies certain issues identified in tne Corps report and is based on the coments by various reviewers in NRC BrancMs (MEB, SEB, GSB and HGEB) who are involved in areas of interface review responsibility.

Coordination of the internal NRC coments and Enclosure 2 was completed by J. Kane, GES, HGEB.

George Lear, Chief H drologic and Geotechnical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering

Enclosures:

1.

July 7,1980 Ltr Report from COE 2.

Suppl. to COE July 7,1980 Ltr Report cc w/o encl:

R. Vollmer L. Reiter R. McMullen w/enci 2:.

R. Jackson R. Gonzales F. Rinaldi A. Cappucci W. Lawhead, COE w/encls 1 & 2:

J. Knight

-G. Lear L. Heller W. Bivins D. Hood E. Gallagher, IE, Region III J. Kane NRC PDR

~

Local PDR' ~

N N

.. D.E.: H.GEB.

f.G..EB.

..D..E H_G.E&

DE..:jtG.g.y...,

E o,,...

J.Kag,3.g...

,,R,,, zale,s,,,,,

,,L,.,,f.,l,7 3.

....;e.t,,,,f,(.[tlLe,ar.,,

JKn ht ev..a =. *-

.. 8/.1/.89.....

... 8!..t.,zso,,

8.4.../80,,,y.

8/,.1/80 8/,,, /,80

.m me ronu m o.m meu na

  • ...............,......................