ML19344E172
| ML19344E172 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1980 |
| From: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Bertetta T AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008280001 | |
| Download: ML19344E172 (3) | |
Text
'
/
W MENT CONTAINS
& P
,g y %,0 AUTY PAGES UNITED STATES e
NU CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Qu
- g
- . E WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 j
Y
/
{,jg. g U s d3 lid U @gg{g h
-pf v c' c ^
% +*
< 1980 Mr. Tom Bertetta 8 Ashton Avenue Millbrae, CA 94030
Dear Mr. Bertetta:
Your letter to President Carter has been referred to me for reply.
The concerns you expressed regarding the safety of nuclear power in general and the South Texas Project (STP) in particular are valid, and form the very basis for the federal regulation of nuclear energy.
During construction and operation of all nuclear power facilities, such as STP, the licencee, in this case Houston Lighting and Power Company (HL&P), is required by federal regulations to establish a quality assurance program to assure that the plant is constructed and operated.in accordance with federally established criteria.
The licensee is further required to impose these same requirements on all tiers of his contractors and subcontractors, and to establish audit programs to assure that these contractors are complying with the same criteria.
These requirements do not guarantee that defects will not be produced during the construction process, but do provide a high degree of assurance that defects will be found and corrected if the quality assurance program is properly designed and implemented.
Construction at STP, according to the recent investigation report, had not resulted in significant deficiencies that were not being properly corrected; however, failure to follow all of the proce-dures and to fulfill all of the requirements of the quality assurance program was found to be such that, unless strong measures were taken to effect better I
adherence to procedures, unacceptable construction may eventually have l
resulted.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (dRC), through its regional offices and resident inspectors at selected cc.nstruction sites (including the South Texas Project) and all operating facilities, inspects for compliance with federal regulations and commitments previously made to the NRC by the licensee.
It was an outgrowth of this inspection program, together with allegations from workers and former employees, that led to a special investigation at STP.
This special investigation resulted in a number of identified failures of the licensee to assure that his contractors were complying with applicable federal regulations and licensee commitments.
As a result, the licensee was cited for l
tnese items of noncompliance and fined $100,000.
The NRC also imoosed an Order involving extreme changes in the construction process at South Texas cc, alternatively, a shutdown.
The licensee has responded to the cited items of l
noncompance and paid the $100,000 fine.
The response to the topics described in the Order was received on July 29, 1980.
Following initial review of this response, a public meeting between the NRC and HL&P is planned in Bay City, Texas, on August 19, 1980 to review the adequacy of the proposed corrective actions and to permit the public to question and voice opinions
.800828000/
)..
. AUG S 1980 regarding the response.
Corrective actions necessary to iesolve the identified problems at STP will be the subject of subsequent inspections by the NRC to assure full compliance by both HL&P and their contractors.
One of the principal allegations which led to the STP investigation related to harassment, intimidation, and ohysical abuse of inspectors.
As a part of the NRC 1980 Supplemental Authorization, Congress made it a federal offense to murder, assault, intimidate, oppose, resist, or otherwise interfere with any construction or quality assurance inspector on a project licensed by the NRC.
It is the position of the federal government, as mandated by Congress and the Administration, that compliance with federal regulations regarding quality assurance, as enforced by the NRC, will provide adequate assurance that the nuclear power facilities are constructed and operated in a manner sufficient to assure the health and safety of the public. Whc, a facility such as STP receives extraordinary enforcement action, it..ed. a sarily receives a degree of notoriety and publicity that reflects on other f, slities.
In fact, this enforcement action is evidence of the intended f :ctioning of the federally mandated controls over the peaceful use of nuclesr energy, and is assurance of the proper construction of facilities without similar enforcement sanctions.
It further is intended that corrective actions taken will remedy identifieo problems and assure proper completion of the STP facility.
A request for a hearing on the issues involved at the Soutn Texas Project is under consideration by the NRC Commissioners.
Sincerely, l
-f $
d
/
l m-Vi tor Stello, r.
Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement i
e.
i k
l'.ay 29, 1930 President Ji= y Carter Se 'a'dte House ilac'-%gton, D.C.
-m It. $esidents Ids. letter is. written to trotest the centletien of the It is ny opinien Fat'f.WeTn'strue-
~
South Tenas 9 elen-Pre 4ect.
tien shculd be halted and 3rown & ?. cot (the builders) sheald not be allowed to construct another nuclea power plant.
Se h?.0's investigation of the power plant cited 22 violations
.urthernere, the T
of fede ally mandated const: action procedures.
sg s (3 own & ?. cot) own inspectors were threatened when trying te do their job. iithout support f en the management, the in-spectors app-oved defective work rather than face fu her persecution.
T.-f_s also raises cuestions about nuclear pc3rluneralt_.
"lir : 3217 eve:fi:Wie'involfed in the :.nvesifistien concedes that These (Texas project) pe-vasive proble :s are all too ec=::en."
facts should put a halt to the ce=pletten of this plant and su.
jeetallpresentnuclearplantsandplansferfuturepiangsto ex.ensive se:-atiq.
Sincerely, A
Ton 3ertetta S Ashten Avenue 1"" brae, Ca.
Ch030 9
.-- cw
-v-.,
~, -. -.., -.. -
,_._,4
-,-,--.4
.r
,,y
,- - -.