ML19344A212

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion for Orders Stating Applicant & AEC Failure to Show Assurance of ECCS Adequacy,Citing Irrelevancy of Environ Hearing W/O Purging of ECCS Record & Dismissing Application & Remanding Matter to Aec.Certification Encl
ML19344A212
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 05/08/1972
From: Cherry M
CHERRY, M.M./CHERRY, FLYNN & KANTER, Saginaw Intervenor
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19344A205 List:
References
NUDOCS 8008060560
Download: ML19344A212 (3)


Text

,

~

q;

,,,/.

p..

(_-

s us,,u f,thq,,.,

,VN PECD. & UTIL. TAC '4 3ff 33g f\\

l t

. ;6972

  • c-, '
  • 3' s

sQ,N % [S UNITED STATES OF AMERICA M l to' ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION l-IN THE MATTER OF

)

)

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY

)

Docket Nos. 50-329

).

50-330 MIDLAND PLANT. UNITS 1 AND.2

)

l MOTION OF SAGINAW VALLEY, ET AL. INTERVENORS

'TO MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE STATE ~0F THE RECORD Saginaw Valley, et al. Intervenors, pursuant to the-rules j

of practice or the Atomic Energy Commission and in light of the Motion of Saginaw Valley, et al. Intervenors with Respect to ECCS Issues also filed today, move-the Board for the entry of orders:

A.

That Applicant and the Regulatory Staff have failed

-to demonst rate reasonable assurance as to the effectiveness pf ECCS; B.

That'since the construction permit ma'y not be is' sued wi::hout a demonstration of reasonable assurance as to ECCS, there is no need for an environmental-hearing which could in no event purge the record of-inadequate technical support for ECCS; and C.

-That.the application is dismissed and the matter

~

remanded-to'the'AEC1for further proceedings not inconsistent

- with~- this ' order.

The': grounds' for this motion are at leas: as follows:

EU08060j(Q

' ~

t 1.? The-record of the rulemaking proceeding aptly demon-

~

strates that.~ECCS: effectiveness ~has not been demonstrated;

' t 3 2 '.

The.rulemaking docket testimony _ indicates that

.g 1 pressure' vessel failu.re'is'not an incredible 1 event;.

=

~3.

This1' Board earlier ruled that'if pressure vessel i

failure-;were credible, it.could not and~would-not issue a construc-tion ~ permit.-

Respectfully submitted, SAGINAW.' VALLEY,. ET AL. IN ERVENORS f'

. _. =

yh

.{.

/

1 e-Myroird/1. Cherry l

DATED:

May 8, 1972 1.,..

e 4--..

~

4 i? y:-_

j-E.;

7.*:

h:.. "

w:

'.1'1

..7.*.~."..

'.:~.: ' ',.;_

~

.: =

-2.

e O

s r

1

.w

.'.m

,s..

A i

a

I.J 1-

~.=

y: -

5 grsl.

"'.r

[,-

" :.T:5

+

e 9

CERTIFICATION

['

=

J gh I certify that copies.'of the; foregoing document-7.[":

were mailed, p.os'tage, prepaid,.on May 8, 1972 to. members o~f

.:=, : =:

=={

m.

the.' Atomic Safety /& Licensing l Board,fthe Secretary'of th'e

(-:

Atomic 3 Energy Commission..and allicounsel'of record.

~

~

(n i

' =...

Myron M.-Cherry.

l

.:ss l

is F

.t e,

.. a

=d

, -.s.

.s c _e+e.

".T.".

~ : T..

-.d_~.-

l 7.

.J.'

[.-

"f;. ?

K

"' ;;u;: -

= :=:

)}s~h-[

~

f.;

g-j' b-s'

.3 s

.'7.'

~

(.'..

r-6-

4.. -

t 1 ~

e

~

'+. ;,',,

+

>: W

-n~n V

' OE.?"

S' l

3 v~.

"t s

~

e.. _

A 1

r a

.a.

-