ML19344A212

Motion for Orders Stating Applicant & AEC Failure to Show Assurance of ECCS Adequacy,Citing Irrelevancy of Environ Hearing W/O Purging of ECCS Record & Dismissing Application & Remanding Matter to Aec.Certification Encl

ML19344A212
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/08/1972
From:	Cherry M CHERRY, M.M./CHERRY, FLYNN & KANTER, Saginaw Intervenor
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Shared Package
ML19344A205	List: ML19344A204 ML19344A207 ML19344A208 ML19344A210 ML19344A212
References
NUDOCS 8008060560
Download: ML19344A212 (3)

Text

,

> ~

q; ,

(_- '

s p.. , , ,/ .

. us,,u f,thq,,.,

VN PECD. & UTIL. TAC '4 3ff 33g

, f\

l t

c- . ;6972 *

,'* . s 3'

s

• UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Q,NM l% to'

[S ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ,

l- IN THE MATTER OF )

) .

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-329

). 50-330 MIDLAND PLANT . UNITS 1 AND .2 )

l MOTION OF SAGINAW VALLEY, ET AL. INTERVENORS

'TO MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE STATE ~0F THE RECORD Saginaw Valley, et al. Intervenors, pursuant to the-rules j of practice or the Atomic Energy Commission and in light of the Motion of Saginaw Valley, et al. Intervenors with Respect to ECCS Issues also filed today, move-the Board for the entry of orders:

A. That Applicant and the Regulatory Staff have failed

-to demonst rate reasonable assurance as to the effectiveness pf ECCS; B. That'since the construction permit ma'y not be is' sued l wi::hout a demonstration of reasonable assurance as to ECCS, there is no need for an environmental-hearing which could in no event purge the record of-inadequate technical support for ECCS; and C. -That.the application is dismissed and the matter

~

remanded-to'the'AEC1for further proceedings not inconsistent  ;

- with~- this ' order.

The': grounds' for this motion are at leas: as follows:

EU08060j(Q

' ~ ' ' -- .

t

~

1.? The-record of the rulemaking proceeding aptly demon- ,

strates that.~ECCS: effectiveness ~has not been demonstrated; .

't  ::: :.

3 2 '. The.rulemaking docket testimony _ indicates that .g

=

1 pressure' vessel failu.re'is'not an incredible 1 event;. ,

This1' Board earlier ruled that'if pressure vessel i

~3.  ::

failure-;were credible, it.could not and~would-not issue a construc- - -

tion ~ permit.-  ;. -

Respectfully submitted, .

SAGINAW.' VALLEY, . ET AL. IN ERVENORS f' . _ . =

e-

/ ,, & 1 yh -

.{.

Myroird/1. Cherry l

DATED

May 8, 1972 -.

1., . .,

e

1. 4--.. .

~

4 i? y:-_ .

j- . E.;

, . . . 7.*:

h: . . "

w:

' .1'1

..7.*.~."..

,. '.:~ .: ' ' , .;_

~

,. .: =

-2.

e -

O s r

,s..

1 .w .'.m A ,

i a

I.J . - ,

, ..-- ~ .=

1- "

, y: -

grsl. "'.r 5

[ ,- .

" : .T:5

+ e -

9 CERTIFICATION ['

, =

J gh I certify that copies.'of the; foregoing document- 7.[":

.:=, : =: . -

were mailed, p.os'tage, prepaid,.on May 8, 1972 to. members o~f

=={ m.

the.' Atomic Safety /& Licensing l Board,fthe Secretary'of th'e

~

(-: Atomic 3 Energy Commission..and allicounsel'of record.

~

(

n i

, '=...

Myron M.-Cherry. . . . .

l

.

ss l _ is F ,

.t .

e, .. a

=d

, -.s.s.

c _e+e.

".T.".

~ : T..

-.d_~.-

l 7 .

.J.'

"f;. ?

[.-

K "' ;;u;: -

= :=:

~

)}s~h-[

f .; ,

g- .

j' b- s'

.3 s

~

.'7.'

( .' ..

r-6- . t '

4.. - ,, 1 ~

~ , - '

e .

V

, '+. ;,',, + >: W -n~n l 3 , . , , ., .OE.?"

v~. S' "t ~

. , s .

A  % 1 , r

e. . _ a _. .a. : ,. ; -