ML19344A134

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Motion of Saginaw Intervenors for Appointment of Special Counsel to Prosecute Charges Against Mj Grossman & Jr Tourtellotte Re Failure to Fulfill Statutory Obligations of Research & Analysis.Motion Should Be Granted
ML19344A134
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 01/27/1978
From: Bonderman D, Freeman M, Land S
ARNOLD & PORTER, Saginaw Intervenor
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8008050688
Download: ML19344A134 (16)


Text

. _.

f &m,% %u.

g.WJ s&...,-,:,.%.o.-le?n.~*a*A%W,- y W. %., m; m.

... - - v

-.. - m r--

W D o m. mlw r

~

W,d.-r **j-a g~ M :W9.%, hn >

u mMhy-$u%m,r n Iy y

m, x, ~n u :~ m wm m.

m~,,

',m-pur g.Uy's G*:,y* L.p: w,$ 'p^ k ') pi. C *.VA:'-C, s ' :r...ht ; > V.H C^ {,f

^'._%+

w v

.e

w~tu n m - s, epn

- -b o

b Q,b

f.;ff'L '.q} '{f.G f' T, N
  • s.+ w M

M.ksf',.Q:y%' Qf -

e!.q :!

~

Xl.?

w vv

. M.D,

y;%.fl

7. # i

,, ) s T,3 Q *;;

kll.?h!$ON

, h 0 'e ~ l &,.

<=%.T*if.> n ;.4 V '

'.; % ' ~ vM

t. O. " h] - [

T.

I A*

f 4

+ ?," Y. n, P m ? $, s 7 ' ' e N' *,, e '

O. ' 3' u y 7 u ' ? $'!:f"'^h 'Q*;. D,+

  • O E ?v k,/ @.M f f

=

WQiW W ~%5.s$N& &5dD?

A W M.m.&. m h.,.n,- o

'w. M+%g; #,;4 W :'~ ~.

x z

mW y

w R.

M:yt n.4, g n w v

~

m 43wMw:

wwi W

F m

M W. / m. nm s :dM. ;,. nUM '~

d.W E

@mMcgv h 3 m a m @w W s p

'l7 J.s

'.e.

a rW; v.

3 w

wca. <

~

3 4

Sg

, r. - Q :.

.3 M M M.; @.J. W T M N ? A1p Nd ' + p# 5 - - -

d?*

~ ' ' If 1..n

-- " 7 I^N plW. p.gg74:[d '.'i

. 3 U.S I '"

% ] [,N.

, * *FI;M i

g

gMg c;W, $, UNITED STAT'ESJ0F? AMERICA' J:0 f;

s w

w. s,g,N'",d [ r e A S eW NUCLEAR REG.ULATORY? COMMISSION-

~:

..i

?

3

  • M,

%,.,. "f, M.,,. Nr y

'.g r

,,p A,',, b v,Q..s. J p*( *.

L c, ~

yl.-M/,l,,,~

.s

"'~

^

  • 'G-d 3
>. y. ' u.,

(;

s w.n n, k vo eg, ssO-, V w vBeforeath. -ee.: AtomicR Safetyd a'nd<iLicen> sing 4 Board,

' %. s;.a-A> n, o

. M+ m vM S M. r't n

n 8., n%,' b~ W1:? ' FFor?Spe. cial,s Proceeding' '

',,4 i

".d

~

i xu.4DMt..w ;b

.,w-

>. > ~. v, s Ay

"'>S v,

  • w" o

,, :n,~.

4 i

r

',%4.?,j?1 J73 t,,. W.. g 4,;,.

n-4

,y,

?

ne

+

4

' ]t,

7_

ms:M:L, '*

s 3~

2 7

f?

In

a.,

S l~n 16,.--l'>A, z

4.-

>~ :O'..,.,h~th el Ma tterforf ' l b. "~ L' ' '..

M ),

4 x.dR,,;

+

~~

a. 3.g..z,,,. e.e

. m. -..

. - s..,e. >,

n...,

. v, s

:.y,,,,

7 t )S... Docket Nos.fio 329) '

4 4

r s

..., g-W%ff,iO

&,C 'k Q,. MConsume,rs j Powe'r Compa~nyn.

.? ) : '

150-330)

~

AM..e 9 #.J cych, f

.4

...,..,, s

- E~

... ~

' 3Midla.snd' Plant,(Unitsj1J.andE2

?)....(Sp'ecial ? Proceeding)f

'Q 5

2

,s..

c.~,..,

.v

.m m

, o

  • m

.F 7

'm

't } / q f,(-

].I

..,-/.

n

't

].[o

m.,

m p

g 11

%kMOTI0kOF$;S$b NA(INTERVENORSLFORk dk'POINTMENT!.

q n y:%

ER

.J0FnSPECIALECOUNSEL4TO -PROSECUTEE

' 'I h

e T'[

,MA 4

.w c p(c,w JCHARGES?AGAINST4 MESSRS.lGROSSMAN'ANDnTOURTELLOTTE -

m 2

i

a. w

- ~

~,

s;

,. sp.,.. y+.

, - ~/,,,u.,,..

o-

,. - 1,.

m a

The FSaginaw c:I,nte rvenors,. through.. the'ir L. counsel,

^

i

- Q~~

,%; move::;p_a...'n Y _

3 3

2 u.

=

3)-

, hereby this1 Board toJappoint special' outside counsel 4,

?

.w

,a. g ;

stolprosecutejchar sgescpreferred;'against Commission: staff-a'$

ps u. s' +

e -.

2 s

=

~ _ g... ' ;... ; _t

._'n~

c o

y;;

W...

.& M;,; r Lattorn. eysc Miltoni JnGrossman1and. James sR. Tourte11otte-M

,i y

\\

a

~

S s

~

g.,,

m..

v.

n

.~

94' %^*

Eby/thlAtomi'c5 Safety ~and" Licensing 1Peard (the " Midland

- m.

. o j

- ::, +

. ~..

,4

v..,f;,,-... < s 5 Board")...

f.

_9 8-a

,4e

,~,ycz ;.*,.*

s

~

_?

y '. -

u p

-.U,-

.v

,i A,

i

l w

+

yp

. I.-

STATEMENT-0F' FACTS

,.y,.

_=:

n w

w

.O g

% g v'

s

.. m

'L'-

4 m.. m l.;'

~

4.%. - f.'t _. O 4

g f

.f*

e',

4

,1,

7AJfu11' statement; of the facts ' appears ini the

- ~W m

n~

u.....

m

, - LSaginaw~fInt'e'eveno~rs/ f 0ppos,ition' :. filed this~' day, : to J'q j

gg-

~.

y

$m

,[the/ motion" of ?hessrs IGrossn[an and -Tourte11ottefto

~

M J

t. ; r W

1;g:s%

AM; e.

aw x

,, m

'.,- S

?.

. r, *. c.

.1.,.

r

~ jdismiss Jforgwantbof ;~ r,ose'cution ;.

Q..

.w,.

In brief, cthe rel' vant.

e.

x..,

cp..

e w

~

ca.. #eG y-

=a.

-+

4 n

m* w w.t -

fa. c. ts, f ar.ejasf follo,w,s.

3

-,J i(

f 4

e g7 _ mv m

- w,m

.m

-e

(

4

.% A 4g.n.

M.. % c.. c f_g' g,

,' as,,

~

.- w 3_

e t

y r, y K.%.:..

~.

s g~ a..

a_

,x's.

.u. - *.

Y.%, [,M f ])0 % Ma @',] % ;.theLSaginawLIntervenorsi iled'

_ _m j mm ~. ' %m w$;ta. m s i.e : 4.e a

1 a

f

w. o&r u.n gM..Jino%idn Iwilh?the.(Midlan'd L Board Sringing:: to the, Board.', s u

6 ~ ~ R n ~- ~ e m m _

  1. ~

w< np,. a,., 4. ', " ;, y*.," s q ~.- p <s- ", K*. s..- w% 4 4 + . m" "f ..y'_ , ), ia f. t * '1 e a ...,, 7, g, f, 45,.,,,&'~- (,. 5 .i+ . s +;r ',' / a',. j- =e-*f J ' ft '- # <. ph s i s' -p _i - un ,.a...

h. ~.3,*,, i a

.[ { e e , k y,( Q'$1E>%.,b#f W:- .. < r.a [ "" y l.0; Q(*x v'.'.-L. *p; y 2.'; L.a )

  • Y_,,,44

,s g.,*- a e - p,, s r ,f c e S.

~,,

w' ',Q, '.. Tu n'.CO.' .=%: s

i.. )
e.'L
f e.A..cW e,...x.

y, sra.. & ^? -= .t > a r ' < c 5 s.c w.w ,.;w.R,s,,c;q'*. p w .,x$ s..- ~ -. W:( o - i1 v v.~

-, 4.m 5

r. yo,. m a am 9.p. ,g ( ,~ F 1. N t""""* P*' ;4.p:.. < ~ " -' , ~ $', ,+ $n ,NQl#.YA ?'.b, + . ~.n :Y-f^h?.h N

  • l $.-

t[ A r J l 2 h h_ f)&> w* j kf$ MZYM[% %esy{UY"*,..e Lw%:r'?s'.r;-.Zq?M%n y W', k -lm ~ ~ I'C ~,. Y ? N :fs; .n ..r nJ Op, s :s. u. . v k :..y ,, ' ' a fg n , W < %.'f9,5 '

  • $*2'.?

~% '"""'*""**G M' M*M s

  • W G

,4

of.w. m.m. Nw wggy<m';W n, smM, ss._,na q.,e se,,~,;; -.o' m wn .,g;%,,a,gy,ymc ymm:m.4. s./.w.. n ea. w .,m. m. - ,~,,r w .m,, m m .w w s .. w. .r g... e - m e., v y%. ' '*f.f.pl' WW ;l ;.f 4 n7. :. : w a, p w g s. o - a ' gy a.. < - p wa- - > v.. v ..,l& 4 ^ b$,.[,, $ q .s b.R ' q - ^ r l e

  • ~ A,k f f,h,

....{,

  • * ^

"v; 2u.n. m. y ff;^ * .b -. ~~s. .>v , } ;'.. , r, Ll %y, r.8 '. i. m \\q W.p'c,h'.;.U A,. y,. ',..f j

' J>.

c'. l '.&, : e - .h.as, fs e- .y 's!, J s

  • q, a:..

i r y ~ L 'f,;;. lfC".,' +>n-' h > '

  • U' ' i ':. 8. (:.

-f;x' L '..., ' f y:<

4,.

R ,,' j.* x 'f ..17 %.~

  • t m/ ' %. Q';; %;T ',n;f g y L }' '..Q..:

sky:;;3 w., ~; ~4

nt4~., uy

- y; ~ ~s q'w, : ps~ r tv-' e m,d

w ;<... s

,,, h :. y;. +

  • -: p# F, >, w u.

a r

m..,,

c r w , a ~e w WW, N h ,ve g. @g @.g e 6 d attention + ~ ~,3 v, a ~. ti6 d w .cer a n con uctiby i Me, ssrs.;Grossman 2and : WO g f,y....N.v y m. ' u. v; a, + n ,w

  1. a -

..t > W w

n JQp;;. gg..

M -.' y._ 7: u ,3 N.. ' Mg..... e. x w@g.g / M~. Tou'r.tlel' lot terand Jseeking h among s.;others thing,1.. b, ,, i' ~ 4 f =.t s gg -. a. ~. n. m, 2 --w, s ; q.. ~f%

w.,

~ x-v. va.. )p, Jdisciplinary;fsanet'i'ons - ag'ainst them.- .c w' yl pW D.,'<.

4. a
.. ~

e. The;groundsT for ? "s . n.... c. e .. m' m ang 1 w t,, Q,,.. m 3 4 if,

f.. '.,,.,,.

" 59. .-.,.s,

J*[

,%{', 4 , f {t:: ~ A.D F. ~ ~* W tlieimotionNincluded (1-)itheawillfultrailure ofethe ' staff 4 v. e , -, 4 a: .n.) n. [M. 6 'rk' O, ..1..,p

s

,w. y n, .,.+... .y n i + 'pa;,, g\\ ^ ' w @a b:v;p,,w a attorneys?.O...toKfulfillsstatutory<responsibiliti.es oft ~ n d m.. m,s s y w, f;j -..tresearch!and<analysisJ,in, connection"with thesMidland;,, n0 s, &,, .n w ,a,. A s,,, ; - w . m..,, y ?.s. ?. <. - f: :-, - -.. ..}. py, g ,, iproceed'ing;.f('e2)lLthetpolitica1E' resolution'by the, staff. n@ W,e. n4 J Jof : safety.Tand{ environmental! questions ~ so a's" not -to m I 9 .c ~ ny. y m ~ p. ... ~ M, f[-- - Jeopardizeh.ti'censee'shconstruction permit;Eanld (3). ~ p ~. y,j Lthefattempt,vimplemented c by. Messrs.. ~ Grossman Jand - 3; e,.~:e. n Tourtellotte, to cover?upEthese failings-by; knowingly. w ,) ., b T', .t, y u ,de ...g 1-e jfil'ing: sham motionseseeking disciplinary; sanctions 'N g,.h

x.

. ~ 4_W - ragai+nst.Intervenor'si counsel.who -had; exposed ' the' W',[ ~

g. ;

s'. deficiencies 11nithe' Staff's.p<arformance. November 4 .~ y, :p' W W Order,4 *(. e.

n.,

se -+ 7 e hh'.. On; November 4,u1977,'the Midland Board. determined ~ p Mr m m -'d> -that the-charges 2b'roughtiltotitseattenti'on;by the Saginaw. + ms .w m pg C,' .Intervenors-wouldp:ifJpro.ven," constitute misconduct. w:. v e.+,=, a. s t s .s 4 ('.$..,' E, hic'hO iolates 10'C.F,.R. $$2 713(c)(2)3 nd..(4)t,: canon w e n, jf..,, . ~, m r; c 17 -of JtheEcode::. ofa Professional ^ Responsibilitycand on

w n -

- 1 Disciplinary l, Rule"DRt7-1,G2d 'This.SpecialtBoard'was. e-6- .,f 4 es.. A .b 4establishedito?hearithesekandEother. charges.- &g ~ o ..'g 'b,'.., a,l:. .--? -X. fA. 'r oi[ e '"). 't 1 s, ., y lh Y, ~,. % 7. '.; i i +, 3y . a- .,. e re -. 9 ~n u, m ~ z ~, s ag .r. nr..f**, ,'.h Q w,,.*- Q. ,_.,-j s &c r s, i l.I Wr Ah Q

y<,, 3, )

4 %' ~ ~ ~ s ~ .p: n' ,4 4 v .h f' ^ ~' + ~. _ G,)QRW ',.., u = r Q ," ~, Q, c. : ,. y; ,1 V. ' M, 1;. Y .e -3 '. .o.;, g.n +un% < - ~.'*! .s,. yW q a.; +.,Dl^ % s D;'s: j~* N A,. y O- .g Y Sf ' ? n Qp:;<3 m., c ,.a. u s. ' ,,.: p, S w.y n. Q,w ;O %;M y,q. f. u-,q:R

A-w
b W.1b y ~;~ng; i ~ : c-v.

y f e;f;h w:;'s % 8,w@r

~,

mW.m.f%w;., s

u :g,x

, x? ~. ;i 1: u

  1. w

~ y s a= m 35 ,8 ~., %'iTe%@,d W'J.4 y.w r e s:T; ~, ', - F,,

.2 o,< r.,UX ? i',f. J5~. ~' ,g; >'::v'~.W..
&.., ~,, x &, t * %.

,m r-1 l, d 5 .s -l. C - W.,L:s._ aw. h w@y n [f... a ve;. <.., n.. r M' " s/ -,/ Ma fx k L..:. - Y~.a.._ c.,8.n': c %,.,.c.. k Wf J a 'e e s.+n n m.+ ;s..w:n.,-w a-g~,- 'o:c .. ~. Mp -"%l,.. ~., g v n,'. og f a.' W t'U N ??y* f. J - y ' ~- { % '-Q.. *. ^ + ,,A' w. ~:l &,'h W,, %.h.l.f.[,ff.,&f $;~l#s..h,.s !s..; W'{'~' f.1 WY? '\\;*y .a b 6 ]N, e, e ....p%. 'aw,{ h' .%( _ lll%j"^ N , s.2. % s 2 .4 . ^ b. s J - \\,,. d, h %,, r. ~jl l('l', - t h '. ~i. !,' l sx e r wmf.MMM A.GGSMl.i.k}lf h'.kjQv;lW;,b"j.),. k;f "g&. %.W' T!!'.,W WlWM ,. s ( M Mf f&he '. ' 7 m cl,Q, ' f f, y' 3*. h. ,. N.'M%,; i * %s,

  • ?;,.. U';"~, W ;f:l W.

v s':5. -f Q u .WI /iWWFfD M a.

(sh wk W yy @y y.+,~ w.n&w: u.m,.m ... s,.., w w .ky . m n:::w wm %c w w n. n n o^ m *. ~T. w g@ m y w

em

.wMr~M~MM@ww % v.v n -Q M M, S $ G ' $ " M k M $. @./ gWhw.S.~ 9 . ~% : 4 - W8.w' q n W 5 ..phh. m. h. m

g. h ;q c k.. ~ - ~.a k

.? .h

  • k.

, u .c bl:2 Y? ' Y.. ..Nh ",n? lYw~ m: N ~ 'x. mb I n

f. %> m p,.M.

w g #ps 3. a e,a..u.,m ; w :.n.s. .)x. . % v, f .P.*: . - m V,, i ", ,; 3 y: g cy .m.. g

  • Jb'..~ 4:ng h:. u s ;..

y .-, e es - ..y -. s s. .. \\; >s, s n

. % @s.w..

. i. o ,.s r n d. yne: , a.. -nn y ~n e ' l; L .., ~ ^ ~ m.m )~ s' W:#:: c;W> %,;fa j ;% s '-uw w- .m* e r p.> M. A,b;n%W f 6 a q w,.s p,;n! p-w. v

, v,w.a.g.%:.

~g wr > 3~ % h,2 W@w:&m-b;@m+ M ~ t + p.W0n } De:c;e&s.n,2;6fl 977 %, 7 J ~y-

r. t x.x; '.

,,,3 e t , nm n .o,. -m% <. ?.3 m m.y ?n ..a .%Q m Lub n..=

v ?.
s u
^, W n:

s >,.J mbers2 sgBoarldXissuadaan;u,n. order. . A, M. $ W,., iM ~ m g mm. m ~ mt w. s s e.e s. M up m %,a & Man'ounc,in~gjaf,y y aringiconferenceTon,fJanuary29p'197 . m u w, sswi m x s: ~..a w ~xm. + m.m. ~ . c .a u -.M n prehe x~ :, ~," =mv i ,. v m+ .s.aww~...y.7~ s.,,y

.pw
; '

z. m-f;F@dMy7 A21Fe d WReg n.63966CTh e Lo rd e ri dir e d t e d iany?wparty- ~x WeWM V*s. %w - @ s e, t,. R,. w: n.. e ,fn Einit'iatin.;w.S.. ms w.&. m c. ~ : &r.... u e s. 2 y >.. gjcharges,Jto i provideJthe," charged < par.. - -,, ~ tie s = by o. t @. ., 8 ' W,,d ^ e., c + e ,wy h GMS,We - M M A. W T 41 1 'l M a ww f ; DO 1.6 i gf WW fM~'" s.JMnuary ?5 R 1. 97. 8 t wit. h n a i statemen tid' scribing ~a the<alleg'ed E i ? ~ e <$s .. W.) t y > q ;q eVW47.. ; ....,Z,' s + w %g arn.d,a,y M aiscon"d'uct?.,,'.oa'nd s,s,, ' ts, :. - s . 4, m ( ,.,. e. t<4 i a; (. s 'v + 5 .,ggv

s m.

En es in nterms?of t,10'; pecif.yingJ thec charg.. c s,..,. .. ~ ,,p y-x. .y g. 4, i

f. y.g,

-:x., 6,,.sEC.F,..R.3.2 713(c)(v.1 T-15)naii,ds.theicode?o.. ,,.. :...J Profe.sisionals ..,.u

- s

. #y r p,',,, ,s

  • ~

,e y m ~.+R,,.,

  1. ,_ A...

a<,, o .n g x W. e s 5 ,~ w m :,. ~ n~ 7,.. 4 N Respon.csibilit.y. December.S197 0rd.er,1, 1. : q. . ~.. ..n a .A a .,~' . The c. orders y n ; <gli'%.r f,J _V a y...-:...,,,. 4,,. ',..., s. ~ 5 v yc .j_,,- -, T tp Np M g. :.apparently4assignedi,to(..the -Saginaw'-In tervencesT 7 u .su 't w ',, R, r, .so.

o

^'. 44

  • y

.. ~.. ,t~ w 3{ t,responsibilityg for(sprose.cuting1the charges againstu . c a A M, ,,t s s:p j,;'._

s. -

<&b ' N. u. a b..j. .a. ~ ~. g.S' Messrs;# Grossman and0 Tour _.te11otte. DecemberR19, Orderp ,e -R.r x - y 1 .-. a,. d x s s , ;u ..( g gy c m < g.p z y y. m,

2. c

'On,(January.9., the/prehearingLconfer'ence was; n. n.... x w n u-g, A ', - m, a heldx as schedialed; SThe.1 Commission'Esta'ff,.Mcssrs', , A. a i w r.. w. ~w n O? ~ s. e,.GrossmanlandfTourtellotte,and;Mr.LCherry-were.all-4 i v

representiedj........lbyicounse. 1However, the,.Saginaw Intervenors

' n' , v,1., ,..4 .,\\ lL N b. 4

  1. erinot(_ repr e s,e,nte,d'}. '

e s. =As?.th'1Eoa'rd will' recall, there w . ;: +.. pr ; A s. ~ 'Q C

wasq aggoodt. deal c-forgdiscussio'noat;the Januaryf9. hearing
M

.,,'Ts. ja n we ,a yx. m wa :~ y ;,abouts the s. : prosecution..of thehchar,geslagainst Messrs. R .~ n n g: +

f,,.
= w.

.n .'v* y '. rh..>_

p, s

g&.cn A,.? p p 1 +. 3 ...Gr.ossmanhitud?. Tours.e.ll'otte.& iDuringsthe~ course'of that.: e a ../ r n" T:. , ' ' y;[w w..:w* '~ *g 'c l a.c%. h n ..e 5 N 7 disc ~us:sion,sco.unsel{v....for 'thenSt'aff announced for the t'h xM, / M.ps,.., 'f r s.,. > '. -.s & ;- % c. 99.x- +p:, ~ ~ w f. r .a.,,.:.$:. - ww,. - e-y . ~ ~ < dQ J#y~ Mfii'.s tj.-time' thatnev'enhthough thelcharges'against' Messrs. w s. @+W. M ,L y ._m n u... - 4 .+ -.R 1.,m :K:e: Gros sm'ani,and,n..AT.ourtellotte3were preferred.by'the Midlan ,@y ?m' %%w,0,../.

  • l1
W l.... <, *i,& z.,
  1. n@r..e. hM.c ',B,.

n d M oardj and Ahence.1were Commission = business, the-staff ~ g:.+ s 2 n,gn.. ..:a.: e x:mr- ,.. x > a,p ~w .... x< m. . _,,,.3.s. ._-m P .[ .s Th a.4 .m e q $w v'. ms:_ x n ] ? . " ",, m g 1 ,j, m j k %,, &.$N.*-5$NW # ~ '$ WZ.. c.*\\- s.

  • 4

~' v# Q r19' 1 Wl ^ e..

  • T,p Jq& h g.8 f.% v:,M L Q %.m,

. s + 9 . c.1 d.eym. ; w~w ~u ev w J,, em m 1 D ' w':s v m ga n# J ,y $ D,yg-Q'.{4%M&MMa @t

m

~ .W. L [.hp., 7 .p t.. + + fii* 2 4 n. ., g > 3. *.;.: .Q 4 ff Q,. ,. y + ' ?s.. ; u'Q 7;; y g.gQ.3,, t a8 1 tt A' N 'f ?$.. Nh.v h(&YS$fNy $ ?,rl:,,.i.;. ~ &: l > 'O' -y <., 9.lffWiQ%. t 3' ?.b:$:w:4M9? M Wr e. a c. t -~.. '~ -.5 SmW@mJM;n'N*$ g&p. : sm M wnu,h.33 ?fN r Qh .%Yl C W ' + 5%?A h,I .y -c t, ', s., .m gpg; w., wy.' A. ~ m7 1, :( i.

  • s e
r. m '3 %, w A..u;r 9.:w.? ;3-.

~,, L. M ;i @ p 9 W W M ' o s s m 1 MP"e@ y; L. ^ "W ~ *, WNS umWP .m m a* .f

  1. p w : m $ m%. 6 s M $ m$ @ w@.

a amw %m y m@p- ?c$ 0 p y. .a a W 4.q%%. en%gw MM ww w%,ys @M H.4 Y EYT C#' d 3"N@g

p.,gQ: a?+? W, p; 6,,

c Q M f g:,M. m. % x,r p. 2 - v + M.

syi, b

t w a: w;, s c, :g.i. A m w,;.e~I m a s,, s t. wns - > w-m - y, n ; ; p.. 97n

c. v,, e.

o- .~ p ,,p -y,. y, gpe

q., c w,j _.gg p.y s.,c g,.m x c..' @c. n.'
m. c.

c &%g, : ~ m; z..

;' ~

. i .4.. ~ f 5, <-- - - s

  • z

,8 %p[v w .3, t.. ,q u Mr. O R!a .' < m'm :, e w3:.u, ,2,. m t .. a J o m u 4 _s m.; m m. r?% ; . ~, -Q*lc_: g.[. e.. - '. "...;-[, f.^. ~[ ;%4 Ty y; ,i o ? '., e;,~ 1 - 3 n'J e r;, ('.,,, *s-N 3 l,. N '/ 4d / a,. n+ ... ~. w:

n. ;a,.. ;,'1

",..s j j i.f'.,, c ' 4 + 1is n ;@w,,.~. a~, #'Y# s, A wouldinottundertake/their? prosecution.;tHearing-e Ms 1 wr. m u _- . W m'. t-3 N s. n X m

n a

. r_,,.w , ; s ~ w w p dc j@vM7/ JTranscri't,iJanu'ary/9,j1978,}pp. 56;57. m.

C1.y,

.r. x m 1.s " < * ,+ sM' f - o %p h. ' T J, ' y m -.:es Mj: ' N" t ~ ' <, 1

. M_ #.

a. . 1'

p.,.

.I wm, y,

  1. 4l ' 4 g-[z '

p,' r in Y f' 6 gp ;1 ' 'Q. s.:. f3 {e f ~ < e'.,~ 4 yl h \\ (a., ~% s --II,.

SUMMARY

< OFEARGUMENT-

,mp ,; 7 4 ~ a r y, <.g/ 7 n e h 7 4 t % :- e Yh. s [ ' ,l, IPhosec6 tion ~ofithesecharges;issthe'

f..w:..

l ~,a 34 s d.7 $ 1.;y y :responsibilityfofDthe(Commission.~ The' charges'were y a c.

a

_..a n r. e ipreferredeby f the: Midland. Board 'and ; relate. to the. .m i +s v.n s ~ ~" 7,1 : jintegrithof ani, ongoing.:Commissio,n :pcoceeding. The A. 3 ~ Interv'enors$hAveineittie'r standing,. qualifications, or .- o ~ [ m.._. s e 1 3h - s 4 a g,

financial; ability?toiprosecute these charges.

Although- . ' ~ a

^=jg N.,

(thet Commission would norma 11yflookoto; the Staff to a, v.

0 c.

[ ' 'l? ~ irepresentLits" interests,-the> staff cann'ot' adequately ] 9

  • s
prosecutecits'own? members.

This3 Board has the power" P, e e^' ~ 3 s + %v to! appoint'outsideicounsel to-prosecute these charges. ,' d + m. <r m, _ ~. ._-....--s. u, 9;~1 EFor. the foregoing reasons, developed more fully v s kh

be10w,[this Board should appoint special outside counsel

/

n.. :=

f v S. w.n

.to'pr.osecute theicharges againstl Messrs. Grossman and

~ e_ '~ 9 ).E 't k + s.,,

Tourte11otte. 9 h

y m n e: L - v: ~ R<L.y, W a ~: ^ g#q, .f III. 3 ARGUMENT. m jv 'a< e.. ; .g- ~ fl ,n. a ' PA.; :Prosecutionlof' the Chargesj Against m#93. o + b; W L J ~ b'#l.W ; , c '

Messrs'.sGrossmantandsTourtellotte.

1 ~ n. ', t - - 31s8the'Responsibilitylof'the Commission: ~ c, = - w ,_l._ 4 r, i L.-: w w. w w, n my' rr n., ' +;a y e

  • V * *.,,...

t f,l1 a s a p y 5 s /.. w,JThe';charges;against-Messrs. Grossmani and,w. ~

g. :w y

. y,, - g %.- + s, ,, ~ s

q. c s.

,r x, r. v, %. 6, e y ; d scud.+l 4,~7 Tourte11ottefwere;preferre'd by the Midland Board:by-- a Q*.' ', - l ' ' - ~.4 ' p? - vA~r e . W 9 s,.~.,. y a.s w , n ~ a x-a b w;b; .m q w J-. s

N.}A ( NI"w7. ++s-a,; p',
W 1 sfp. s s-3

~p; r sg w W, c'. % - g9 JNt y ;... 4- ' 11. d4 A i wn

_ g p-g v.M # $ fff'-[.['t

>,,a ~ ~

  • Q,[$~Qi e "

M V ^,- c, hN[W rj n'%ny ; g tyg y g .+g.gy'p%,> L, M 'ni >' -.m l 3 ?, % 2 a ~ y J. _g ao g, l T[l 0I/ fk - k <;la. -y +, )( Q ,p -_g_ ~ (

qh ? &m n w m ; M y+ R Q p & q q]s,,:,y W 8 xb..s m y W ? u W W =" W W W ". ? T h R T : Q %) / ', Q

M W

)M A q:p. c m y w, l p#fW, -i% nf :, sT _J1' p ;e Y @ %.. %s c M n w ~. e n ~~ -m ~,. ~ g m m m. w,o.4 +m, w m s

2. 7 );.c s... w>

..s 4 y y,,, t , e..g. - my w a. s up-3,N f p'jdi' ill'[',[ \\ g " ' p..; 'e* g - m$yq.y ~ ,.'~. ' ' [ .,g y ~ .i*Qyd

l., s, a 4

37 y v.. ' '..,9 . ") w. .a [.<t ' i <-,~ 3;.. .s \\, i ? 4 f '[J I 3

4*

4 %&:;W.,gepl % o p -,~r r ., r >. - m.. a~,, w W, g '_/ ,e wn

W

~ M; F - - 'M ,. y e Y w.' penm Lg os f..~ m, _ -, .w .w ,a n i w r m e % r & u. p y,. m w-r,"c; m, ~-.. n,. m m M s c. L. y-t J$w$Q ^.g$.a,s" orderfof;Novemb'erJ4,31977.: ' The: offanses.,,* e' t n +m all'egedly. ' X ,m~ 'p#u. v g',L T[A na IM';;(ly,,M 9 N 'M o[mmitt'ediweretheldato violate'the~ Commission's/ rules . MS. yL+ J 's m 'Y ';[ ,b'.' .,t. '15, 5 ^ m.w

4.:n),g,.

+ a

  • e; s > g# '

w, a 3.g, w c j; - ~_. 3,- s- {- M.,.fscondubtFlorde,rsofcNovembe'rt4,M. N 12 '. : yThe offanses-o p_l *

w, s

a:: y... o . ~ :W.. .yl .. l,".,.

  • 1y, ~... ; iT'..

r ug.we c scharged:.Lwer,al.broughti.to s the' Boar,d's ' attention 3 by counsel,.- s'.N.' e .,G-- ( a Y ~

  • 'I E

<t1 2. , :for;thpSaginaw1ntervenors. However,tthefinterests; W c y, y ., J,, s; e./ .c.,. ,u, 4, % ' i,~ w.. fat stakejare? obvious 1'ygnot,the private. interests ofI ' .,g w< t,u. _ e c. bthRint'ervanorscor$ny;other;part'yfto.th'eMidland . ~. ~. - n %( ,? proceeding;,;At1 stake 4areithe im' age ofithe Commissio'n ^ (, m ') A ) 1; '4.o .i w.. ,.m ~ V and".its abilityitolfulfill:1.ts statutory and ^ t< ; m 2 b constitution' alm responsibilities.. Like. the courts in v,. . tiheidisdiplinary; cases cited below, the Commission;and [tw[ - Hidl'and Bo'ard, snoththe lSaginaw Intervenors,. a're - the - a-g ol tEuk " plaintiffs" andimust bear responsibility. for ,' f! l ',N I prosecutioniofhthese charges. h v, 1 * ,.',.I y. <g $Ana1ogous; proceedings against attorneys- ' ^ ~ w. n N demo _nstrateithate the;Saginaw Intervenors have neither. m, I E n, Latanding norJqualifications to. prosecute these. charges. y a-f y r -; g ..a., t lQ ' Fo'rzinstance,rin?h'ol' ding that a complaining. witness ,....,w. . p.

q L
lac,kedJatandingitoimaintainsa disbarment proceeding:

r -s eptf . a.e ; 1, s: y., i, aga; inst an?at"torney, th'e. Eighth Circuit stated,; N r

e. -

m e a. jb A +% S " AnV1,ndividualj may Jactingi as i an: S ' tinformer, :makef available~toJ the district. V 1 @pjp: 9 3

court Epertinenth'information < bearing-

^ a yp;M.W Juponi.the[qu'alification forJ professional ~ s DF;, ' .4

  • ;conduc t. ' of 6 al memb'er1of,ithe. federal'

~,, n '. m m wr ew . M. .~ r Ayg ..q'd; a ~. 5 2 r y.: M .. >,~

f i

,i c. - Ccri ,~ ~ y, y,,1 ~ v..y.. 2 4 4 ^# %Ug'h-4 i., ',' ; Q ~ Q 4.,y y, j s, y

p N gl T..f3_

' VN.j% _ e. s a s.- y. (, ^*& f k~s .~, 4 v " L.x y a s;y.u }; r f. - % '>, ...n.n' . f{Q: q$.kl,MMR. _ p,.g y p,{ ',^w', w';- v f a' ~ \\ a r r .p.W V Q :<,. _.cuw. .g ' i L ' ?. h i45 ',r x. g r. t s I

.r

,'. l tl:V T r $'l. s' MN v eM @w.b ~ thrh *M. I $;. m,M /.S 2.., w5 [' < < 4 U N., f *. - ' E D.D,'.

  • '5,

+ t a ~,6p K. + s ',%{C :.'W % f'Q :n( .e e (lm,?(.w f.fy%)M(7' Wp,.g n o, x .h. d T.. T a: -' ' W w ;n ' - n < ,.#? s-h % - M.,Te q. e$, $ 5 M M W @s.c AMec OMM;..sE : H & M 4 1 ' % o + +o p1 m. f P.. a x j$^ 1.4 l

pW U?$ w! &,g $.v.,. mkyn:nnww_YO' "?. w.n w.m. en-w ea ' ? w' ' U " '. ' 7.smm;+wxn wnm c4 wvM T .O n.< s %*U > ' ',E ? i - l-k" % ^ "'N N W' r ~ $ j^'? s G - l~ N, t & pq Q.<>; Y,w n w %.:n ~ w~, ~ , -. y, w W .n.. '.. , p,.d 4 7. ; ^ ' -, ' L,..

  • +., r s1' n M w+v

&,g.c h &w.,9 [r.,q<,, x,; ~p.. m- + v.. 8,' g. gbu'?O ^ m,4 m_ ' m/.. -.. r <G - J Ai i ?* e :f y a 5 4s

  • 3'.

n g. 4.> ~w. p, -gly. ; ^;, *,,n n ft fw F; m - ~ - w, [ ' k a m,9 w M, s y ],w, t >* *, ' < w g -8 v t y:,. ', - ..- 62-; w t z,f,& "q_;t;a. -m.. s.s t ;* s. g p^s 3.; ;, - 3 .~ <, n a , ;f,, 5.,, p,g g y,s + ~, s.< ~ .n .g g y, g.., c RE fMc " ibar'W 1Beyond&thatJpoint the l individual. s sayincit? exercise. c ontrol 7 ove r ' the ' ' + if?"7,7 * ~' o; 1 9 0. i : 'J - . # sproce.edingsk ; Fur t.he'r) action,T it: any, L-yy-e ' N becomes the~ responsibil'ity? of: the. gp%';' V. court."i Matrice v.JMeyer, sert.! denied- ,f' 1353 F.2d .316,1319dEh"Tfr. 1905),e ~ E ,gt 4 - *, cJ383 U.S.x939s(1966)e s ,4 xy - *g e t ]. L, l m @r&$m 1-v .x 1:'..e. >.[ !And(in'Lefrak.v.3 Arabian American' Oil'Co.,L527_ J b 4 n %.l.-.: ,.e, '] iZF.2dr11361(2dLcir'3;1975).,:theLSecond circuit noted that-N ~ ~ '+ 3e 3.,

f. #...

. +. k , ~. ;. n :, ~ 4J s s,.1t n"wouldibe lo'ath.:. '.L to mandate a(pro.cedure:which H w 1 e E W. Twou'1d 'castN counse,liin: the role ;of prosecutoi in/a L u-y .)-. . proceedingttofde.termine how oppos'ing. counsel obtained -i s e .h*

v.._._

n. r m hi's Eclients.;;t. Litigation. normally provokes the heat . i v @j an'dTfriction:which hardly-qualify counsel for1one of [ Mthelpast'iesf:to<actias the impartial' champion.of the' 9 e, gn 5271F.2d at: 114'1.- ~ f w 9. profession."'

*M f..
wg n
7 -
Similarly,:in'.Ginsburgtv. Stern, 125 F. Supp.

~ w,s q 1596J(LD.--Pay 1954), aff'd, 225 F.2d 2451(3d cir. '1955), u, m tthel court noted that - N s .1 d,.. s 1 e. f" Plaintiffs'ipetition, just asmany J' J

. ~other; compla' int cof; professional

f W._ y i Watac onduc t Jme' rely Jsupplied L info rma tion q [;<.. [glq.[. . v Mfor.ithe: courts'sconsideration. s 9 } k' i"Pliintiff?is~an informer'and;nothing

)

'(, . yg, 1 , j.

j,n p,, J andias,su~ck,shas(no'right'to, s
a
,,f N S'
sbe? heard : sit (any stageJoff ther proceeding, 1
4 P! t...,'~ N 7 *imaycoallEuponthim Voites'tify."

A . m,, ~Maav~elasstheicour.t.or-its committee' ai M Q m. .1 ' - 527i ',M df. dN. :V. W A, f , ;. F FL.2d s at1603.; m 4 . MfS,

g. W9 4
  • [

k j g }WOlW,;?, h,,' ', *

  • &l<

' Uj.

j i

NA,

. +p '

~ l fd1 %, % ' l,; '... .,;i W ' Ti n y g/ M~ tom./, JJMe t. "i t'J,W 5-MW i. ~W4 '.'.i< .('~

s,,, 4.,

,n s ..l.,~&.N $h5 l[ Q$ ? M,.w?.

\\

~ 4 - Y 5 .jO

s. ;;.

s r y

  • i f%c.

4 i s m.-_ "y v s, Nm.~m ... ~ -,

i s.: r~

=l p w V:s Qe -t v r '- Q;; ; MQ,;= e e U c, ., y - l,.'; y ^ a .,p g. +n ;g: j e 2 g c s wc' y n r..p; 1 s Q :. m.,

  • *Wl,

n', O. % '- i.(d Q,N:%,.;,a:%PMQf.@p-@. s v,..?:l%.9,f p &%, '. Qp f,'l& v., n -.., m r. g Q;. > , m( .[1 +. :t., M:., ,>.^' 'l ' ? ~ s .r-J _'1 r.;,pg 3,

1. -

MW ;,x.9.m.M g,. g y, n. _ '. M' 't n.a &. ~%s 4 g ;' v;xg;n v[h,W'd.h.. ~ p 3 [;:MIY ND,

M.M i e,yg

,.,., 'N., ( W W m Q.M $. n:g:gyLG 3 p 4 3, q9z, ,- i py. 9:q

adyls MWux:y@cwV:

y ,p Yfh $Y0Y

I SE

,.. ;. e ..y n L.,,. x Y ?Y ~

%,L.c p-m y a n ~:%7:vM * ~f WW4 4:m%n %w$0 @ v[:* Y M i M?- n j V[MU' e v<, w',i - .u::w~d ' ~ -~ : k D u e ' Ni s , D i@ ~&,'

.'y bo, 1

'v,Jc ? 4 1,y ~. a,w+,c, - "M, <.j p . Q ~~ e N g A :. M.* p Y. 49; i;. o 11: ,+ >-c r, s .i.- }.3s p.. [:l::' .7 s ~ -.s n u.. _ ' u t: - ,m g c a e m b,..q., ' >L p.? l Accord [ Application, of : Randolf Phillips, - 510 F.2d :126. . ~ s +- c, /. ..(2d,Cir. 1975).: n ~ @c See also'TranswickD v. Chicaro Bar E Gy. ^ q '. Association,.l307F.2d)2'1:l7th?Cir.19621.- 4 W - m n ~ - a ~ s u 4, ',i.-., 7* y. f f Further,: relevant l authority, in this area' includes', e y = u aw & yf[ m m the Disciplinary ' Rules. of the-District. of : Columbia Courte _. s a ";H z '-~ m mm m - 1 w.. .= .. =.. -+ ,2 y .~ .v. J Vofl Appeals, /wh'ich " assign respon~sibility; for prosecuting b. disciplinary lproceedingstolBariCounsel, appointed:by. ~ 7,'

the Board on Professional' Responsibility,~not to the

( ! complaining witness.! Rules of th'e ~ District of Columbia r - u . Court Lot. App'eals p: Rule 'XI,. 56 "Neither' unwillingness j .u notineglectiof the; complainant to sign a complaint or. to prosecute.a chargec. .n. justify abatement of an-i -investi ationiinto the1 conduct ofyan attorney." Rules' l E p 'of the -Dietrict -of Columbia Court -of Appeals, Rule XI, s T5 ' 10'. d 1 U Indeed, assignment-of prosecutorial .J responsibility toLIntervenors:could cast Mr.. Cherry s' 'n cin;the incompatible? roles ~,of witne'ss and prosecutor. gg a P' tCounselifor~ Messrs. Grossman and Tourtellotte has already. m 1 -~a g p ./.. '... >X o ' raised-the[ possibility of, deposing Mr. Cherry. '1 n yf N - ' Jranscriptiof, Hearing', January 9,1978 'at 102. This t 'u g. g ~c. y_ ~ Board should?n~ot_ perm 3.t:the spectacle of a'prosecutim '9 e ,4 .. ' y{; r. 3 /} 4 $c ;p 3 a ^'o ')pg_ :'2 "g ' > If Z h[ g Q.a,.\\ s ~V Q s fh % r [m. ~1. j> .m gm e m ::, t. y ~, e };j'gS ~ lQ,.M l:Y ' Q (?q.;, 9

)

~" GM, e %yp:n:e +; % m,'.3%M s s gm.S - 9 y ,,-:Byf.87.1 [.,N,YW~ +

(

3 G,. -g' L.}l ;, ; [ .m ~> A v. Mb n#- m. O, 9h-[Sk+@% M. n.. k. [. N ~ .e g,N [ O '., - L$ I '.;Y,.

m. %y JM. -. e n '

c 'T ? ', ~ .c N ?. -5 y wawv me;ra-m- - - .-.5. : hgAn.y, m As Q -rfe.+ + [ O' c = -

% &[ f 4M. qqy ;,yP., n 7';(,"; y & N+"-W "~, % % & ~.9.L/ =:. :%:i Q j + Q f f xQ '; MS X '.V 7?' N . f._, ,g, f. x ;3 5 '6 w::. -) ; ' a; f. O 2, w,. & D,

.w, g y ~,'

r;- ' e# . 4,- 4 -J e 'L a h' m : u " ( /.7 t g g-A m. 4 a.c n,; +:

y w

@62

sttorneyf onE thel. witness. stand,; a( situation. expressly y

~ oc

-c;.

}disapprovediyf the Code?of Professio'nal Responsibility. N l ,.5 . / ,.*+ "The roles:of.an advocate and;of a " witnessfare inconsistent;~the D nction-of an advocate 1s:to; advance or-argue J. .the.cause of 'another while : thatL of-w-.- ta witness ~;is toLatate facts. n p~- m - -Sobje'ctively."_ Code'of 1rofessionali O iResponsibility.. Canon 5,:Mthical p Consideration 5-9.s ~, ~~ j e Moreover, this Board's, order imposes upon the s-g l+ lSaginaw'Intervenorsfor their counsel the considerable expense involved in prosecuting these charges. The .} s i Midland: Board has noted the precarious. financial n w.- I a situation - of - the :Intervenors. Order of February 25, y. 'd. i '1977.. Imposing:on them the~ burden of prosecuting these 'f . charges would seriously jeopardize'.their continued participation' in the Midland proceedings, the value d ~ -of which 'has.been formally noted-by the Midland Board. - ) .a Order.of February 25, 1977..It is important to note u ..i that the counsel fees and~~other costs.of-the Saginaw y p<' Intervenors,.unlike-thosefor the staff'and its mc=bers, .b'

are not.being) paid;by'the Commission.- It.is one thing f

m ito orderfparties on the Commission's payroll to conduct a o. M. Litsi-busin'ss but:lit?is'quite another to place such a e 4 'urd$n1lonia[pri.vate; party. ( v. b ~ O,t r a_ l, / ,g . '; l ? ^~. ' ;$ - r.., ^ ' 8 l . -{ ><r i* y

n

~ .Y ' W MPl.O A 9, .; r : 's j' n

'; " '....) E ;2s; r.,.

4 / ?, hs.cM.Y [ .; b, . '.4 l jj^' 5Ei v 'm. qu .;a w

0Ywf Ay, y2sN,l,$hfS; & & f $,% Q m

~ ~~~ 6 v-S?

n' D

' ~ y + Li: ~ y

. $2MW$m%y&npw,?acm$NW nlhhh$;hh h$h$h rh W %w.w:pm vn .4.w.mw.m ;,4nJuw ?gy .m<,w.e , ;.w.. O.... v -.. n - ~.,,.,yi. a

n..~;x yx.=

, y-n 3 O a v~.

< n r

.y g%g':,".D,,g';.[, I:g <k", i $,iy,'* ;m w#- n#;g.' I S h=.a',L. a.. I+.,.g f _ ' m .~ au Uk - m~ '. l. ; i [.l ~, 1 ' DQQ

  1. a P

1 a,_ + 7x . y myy 4 w s-w y i ; M Y.7y. 4 c, m ,e v.'k,.,. j' 9,., g>- g{..g+.a s s , ;. yj + g,wp w qu 'am;p; AJ n;, y-P,. ,yw, .+ +

L

'y s ~y,. - n w m m m'. s.<-.. <, e. : - MC . 4. Y, _ y'c uq* ,%+, A, 4 s e A". ' A.; g ".. - J - q 6, cx . :s,' M< 4 e Moreov, er,y...:'ecution ofi these: charges.?would R;'y cu e p'ros v ' a n.g.

v..i in, ' a.

f:Vfx. :,,.,.. .,:M,. ,,. ~ i,] W. , 1 ;ble} beyondf the5 usualfconcerns l ofc the ;3aginaw gin tervenors. A s+ NW ' - ,g,, g ~s 3 f y;,,~.., p@. ' " 1This; Board recognize ~d, thatifactiby; requirin'g "special' _ ': e. .r4 s i w, :g ..~ ,,...n . p">. ,1 '. x

e n c
/ <&

wp c.?

authorization fros ' the Intervenors l tolprosecute: theset,

y,,t ~ m m e J o char.ges.' 4 Transcript of.< Hear,in',. January. 9,.;19781at i .g c . s. g ? A t-,j, W LJ '.( .32'L :In t.actpto;~ require;the-SaginawJIntervenors to }

o. f n

,~ ...L k" w .L ~, use itheir ' mea,gr.e resources,tnot onlyrtofdevelop the M t E s:. ~ v . + . record:in'the m.ain Lpr_oceedingjin -light ~ of.the staff's- . 7] ,j y s y ~ .c". Wf' failure to do soi butYalso:tojcarry out:the'Commis'sion's ' ' i* rw~ s-own~ duties!to' regulate.its' proceedings, is simply to. f abdicate the Commission's dutie's.; [ C .m s 7 ~ Norlcoes thefdecisionrin5 Toledo: Edison 1 Company; s .(Davis-Besse'~ Nuclear: Power: Station, Units 1, 2,and--3)i-x p :, ~~. o !ALAB-332,_3iNRC: 785..(1976), require-prosecution by the. m 't i 4 N ' complainingDparty in this case. - In' Davis-Besse a party: ? f~ ?.$ 'inoa: proceeding before: a C'ommission1Lic'.ensing Board' .r ~ V e; ; -movedLto disqualifysa, law: firm'from representing another- ~ yr n... b~ l v party inethat. proceeding because;of'the. law: firm's prior ~ , trepresentationtof the mov.ing, party.in allegedly related s 1 } m' l ' i < "s '. ~ - m .mitters/ rInsthe suspension: proceeding the moving.. party j.c, ' ". , e 9 .a <"pecsecuted" the charges-'againstithe -law firm, a .l m-c m- &, ]w 4 'w hprocedure approve'd by2!the-Atomic Safety and Licensing ~ f ~ , n f y q p[ Ui ^yppeal? Board 413: NRC'ati800. ~ ' no:%it,%g *.;.g' JA,.. ' y N. 0% * '..p,.s -N t? s...

q q.

M: a h-[

f. g 9.

6 ..,, y, ; y ; ;.:._,., - yp t b, 'w g& m y * - + ~ w .y Q 1l9, :;! 4.f.g ?ff b [ h ' L - <j ,&y[^ u. , :%n. p , ;9 a;- ,hln.l,Q s&. r r n;

Y

~3 ,.y,. ] ,4. ?, 'l ? c u ; < s .. y w L Q C.;i. - .;-.,d .. q., 4 % / v t. %,~ D', ?. a e 3 i (Q*z!?.. e % :u. Jgd, [n& 2c.a. -.. t."-: N;b :,.,, k;,, +,... A' ' ~ .^ m-j ^ . f.5) ' m pu n w w'Y4wE. h ^' + y k f, r .L Q.'E

  • i FIW?.QffhQ;! ' ' % % j'w' -;

,~ 4; ' y . ' + ~ r 4 "74 h

  • f !b T

^) fg, N &:j-' + 'f. w,pl. : T.T,l,$R.4,-)IY ?_~ Ea ? b,-*O'?-% '.a.k 'd, 3 ~ 5 E ~. Y 5 l

  • i, 5*n l,

n u s.',, g, pq

n. n %.&.me,?D, K }a...y,;u fG,f. :

l< ~ l y

9 $;
a,l,l'y:.

u. r e w r N;t E 5; J ~; ~ W ' }' <

  • r s

w ., ~y Vl. : .+9 / r,x g.., c l 3+, y,.._ w % $; w.2 % ml.%".' X L,n ji W K L A. &' &s^ Ml % r .~ y n e M~1.M,q.?' ' %> h-3&a7;.,l5Jf : S.. '.

  • l & &.,. b

= a G W 2 a M % kH W d b.' < ' \\ S nW WMT %b 2 M :'.%. .% C Wa C-X '. + d = f M -

m,.,. e m..g+,,4m.:.n., w u.m* m... m. 1. w . _w a;d:.w u:.::* a%>:.. u- ~. q.. m.#. e a w. r _ %+ w nw . f t %m., % c, %'y v wW p .,r ~ -e -;m s #s ,=# 37 e,. w .M W!y s ,, -@@e , s; v Q.m m;& M M,m,. @% M,%.:A u %..M, ; % ; M f.%n i <;v' G. ' s ' nq a M y? = = W:% ..? ~ t y M n-i A J. & MfL QT < w # < 't yw-s. .A ;, P}r vs k v.. as. h 12 4.,, ,o

a. ' ),.

~ q; hcl.fy>g perl%'(\\,.r_g $;w/:'. m, u,.;.1 m yc:,.w,9 ~ a ,m %g > F, m '.", - l + ~ i s - L *; - '4: 4 y

rg a f ( p mm. ih *,. u, ~

q, .,/ c e _ r, s ,w - is a .. D.10c.' '.w s o .m h -' 4 v , 'ma' p g y -j e, p ,\\ ' -', o, c[..;. . y h* a, 7, )w;,%l."," yQ .+ .O.E T, 4 'd' g; 1 ' s w h.. r8 :f C,N - . M.asuming thatbprose.cuti'on bycthe moving < party? . O. q -m r e n ..n n,. a v s , m w' e .a'

M-y#$)

,. n Y ., w 4:was1 appropriate under the circumstances ofiDavis,Bessee, - ,4 v o,- .c y, ljy3'; K. g / ' b % ithsnotf(ap'propriate7here.;iThe : alleged 3niscoriduct J e 4 o pg e, m j-9..1njDavi M ess.e relatedDprim'arily)to'the' private rights' ~ x. e.. ~ g .uw,,,. .~. e, OF. o f. the: complaining / par.t.y. :Those rights could have?been < v. , s KR f* ' ..? .i

  • j.; waived by,!sthe,Loomplainantfandfit would:have'b,een

.L ~ '., N t ! ;) ./ _ ~ r_ m p.q ; x. m y. n [,' M :appropriaIefford he' Board tolignore-the/ alleged ~ offense- ,v ea r';Wg. vbutlfor thejicomplainant'sLaotion.~. i3 NRC at 802. =In- ? [ ;, s, 4 U 9l y .a, j y.~. m m y u. ~ M[ - :cohtrast,f the. charges preferredLagainst Mess's. Grossman N r t'. -1 ~ y- 'and"Tourtellotte' relate'tolthe0 ntegrity and fairness 'q i ~ J y c[ 'df'the?e'ntire7Mid' land. proceeding', ~rict 'to. interests m' ' , peculiar,toithe'Saginaw Intervenors.- Thus; unlike the .. [ ' E,

i...,..,.,i,....

- situation! Davis' -Besse," the ' Commission:is the true party a x J n a ~ ] .in linterest fand i should N bear. prosecutorial- ' responsibility.- ~ ( s cy; 4 O L,.;' ~ 1 -. Davis-Besse is also unlike"the.present case f * .~. W:"., .in thait there :is. no indication : that? any ' counsel for p;s;m, the: moving ; party:in Davis-Besse.. testified or was deposed j,' r 1 ..f-6 V e, - inf the: disciplinary; proceeding'. fingthe present " f M: proceeding,? counsel for Messrs..'Grossman and Tourtellotte g

c. y.

s e,.. n j g.y hasialready? raised Jhe' possibility'ofEdepo' sing Mr. i ~- w p g. Cherryq, January 9,f l9781 Transcript, 'at :102.- Mri $P. ~ g C .-Cherry's; testimony.1:stithe hearing).thus seems likely. ~ u: pf.; ', [- t, <Prosecuti'4: nW . Lg #: gethe" charges;against Messrs. n Tourtellatte: - ~, s,g y 'a?.A y,. - :.J3 f fandlGrossmanUmayf hereforeicastrMr.sC.herry,in 1

v. m y:

a .u9.g a; nf t &,y$ p$4, m -v y 9< - A R Q- ', - ~ ~ n m r$ ^ r 3"'"' Y o E 4 4,_ " ~ N ,,,,N,

  • I 'a 0

My., Q:. lyyy ?. -( s r < y' n .4 s ..+3

w,

=.,.

  • 1 L e.wl~..'4s..

0 jY( 3,fll*:. '.n A v ^.n * - ~l J E *.;,4... A n; + ^' s, r a $&Y.. r mp.p y[ m;.t " <.. 5Q f tll ? ll> q&'e? D'e. u;'- . Y 4 - lbk?lN.$y, h, ' &?p; y,.y l,, w = T: l ~ m, - sy o v ~a w m~;4..,. m3.m mg, s-.. w n& ~ r A. 4 j ^ j um+eqwagw:;,wnw[T' w:~.w[w-s+ s +'. - n - - %y -: ~ .'1,4;, .$. [i i s . m y n g g w g r, m qu,n g w ; a m = w: w :w :, w,,

w b w - a.c. w N.eL g % s c.a.w W; /. m! e@ar; "% %.W&G..WW*%- p%u ,m. #. mww

~n.

%.%,y.n.v, m w%,s3,p.g:p; m:;:r,. ng.D gn. a w., c c x.. y w..m -. ~~ q ' + x " %, % s: ' ;r 4.l; y+ q ?.. :m y + w ;fx. c e s nwy . n.~. qM .n:

4. r qc
~

a v -3 g.+vp so,.7 m,.%s,;.;&c tw m 9c %, w. %.. 1

n r

r a. w a /t. r MW V, u? '.'q%,ap. - s ;, v,.v a;. n,.- + ~, w x.- -,e,c' y.m. >.m.,,g.ma m ;,p.. .x w %n

q n

n ;, n.a m m :. s n w W ' F.;h: z'.. ,l N. J ;~e QTf9W:

-f my,p.,9y s =

<~

. zy;.

m, g . x /p. _m 1.1 ;. ~., - e,. -: ;;, , g v 3a - : ? w

7. ',,

w-g... ?:k,,b' ' - llt n .~ 4.

py v -

7

s N q
  • i i

y s, s g.C - y-1 dij i~., ,N',.- fi. 'd ? '5 f 1 '" e . h% ' a d., ' '. :.f.":Y+, ~ ; l. f' Ag[y{3

' cinconsistenttroles _ nottappar,ently involve ld' in Davis '

/ e .s a --.... : a ~ e i .88 .m., g', .,:g B6sse.; p.?; ~( .c g,5 ,3 k 4 M.a a -#.~ ,T- ,./ &,i 3 ( ',, c ,~' x r-; wv.- ,.:y .n y ~,/. m. y-' ~H. e,. g v., =.; *

w.

4 .3. w

B. O The ) N RC St a f f ; Cann.o t [Ad eq ua t e ly;

,,li s N% g% a < Prosecute These' Charges.' n j N y 77 s t p .f r* ' lUnder normalicircums'tanc 6 the;Commissionicould .R a w. a t... W .n. e r w -{look toLthe;3taffJto represent'its, interests.- Howeveri ~ . w n ~ sr .,c m:1 .c ' s where,. "as here', ; charges f ar,&.e, preferred against memberst y s 4 ~... ~ e a 'orithe: Staff, it. would2be manifestly; inappropriate for; 'n m + - -the Staffjto; conduct 3the prosecution.; (The inevita'ble 'N y .. ( e ' 1 loyaltyfand. concern that~co-workersLexperience toward ',(y' - lonejanothe..r: and itheir institutional' employer, preclude'- ' f m.W O~, - theidetached objectivity:requireditor effective L E ~~ st Linvest'igationi.and 'pi osecutionsof Lcha.rges; such asithese. ~ c z rSee, f e;.g', In re Shelly,12 ' A.2d. 809,,814.(Pa.-1938); "p - w y 6; ~ ~ .(disqualific'ationior a' prosecutor >is ne.ce'ssary where d s a : - V he is unable /to act' impartially. because - of-obligations 0 P". T andiloyalties; so tconfli'ctin'gL as virtually J toi render '/ ([ ? N

impossible; the performance of ; duty").

State v..Leigh,. u a.,, < ~ ~ ~, ~ 289 P.2d.774, 77.7 (Kansasi. 1955)'.. ("An attorney _ cannot'

e. /

~ M' !befpermittedito:. participate.'in the: prosecution of a m ', 4 0,_ 3 criminal"caseLif,Jbyjreason of hisiprofessional u 4 s, ^

D i' C T relationshipf with / the accus ed, ) h e has Jacq'uir'ed '. knowledge v'

'y w, + gr Jf 7 fofifactsIuponiwhich;the prosecutionfis medic ~ated?or ~

f >

m,,

.,. c i

~ ~ W i wtiich areM losel'yFinterveneftherewith").1 Indeed,:the )%S / .E M.L'N 3: ~ . igg _/. a ~ ,.w N e. c C L. ,. n,,'.. f.i s. g s + s .z e , b.' [ a * --,' ,,[ ~,.7', ' y - " 7 { , / z'f ',; ' y.; 4 - ' ;*;. 7

en-

, -:L - i ^ * * - i %.- ) [ .1 vy e Q );[,. ~ ~

]f

. ~ ~, n l 3, zq ~lll I$' &bfbh,. r 11/ 5 t

  • t.,

'[ ~p 'f. ', nm:..e.. mx&:fh hj ~ Yh NOl lN ^ , Nh ~ wn n.x.y 8.: c.< q* :. . r u~. m p ~ ,~ q %. w. .m. ..g. 9 vm m /.W ~,g a. NYhh 5W ?.. ? ::iD o, -~n n w. ? " h $ $3 %., & $ N W h : V W $,,, > .? M,N Q Tk N.,y;p.d,,g N.o,:R N Mii,k, M d,b $.U M fb.y' - OWM M,wyv.

w; x g m 8

",e,y-BOMffN : 6 W .- 1.. . w.yn,x,, n..w,;.,C .gm.w R. n -

q;, w m

n n n, y,;n'. ~ -l,y sg n 1 e .w

%.W.g.Q:;m@r. Tim;Wm7:wW y,. O, M ". C f = W .Jl D r" ' % y Ml,f mf ?% f N ? ' R$ a. Q-TG; pi.W: in y + p y .g~ ;P - ~ x-T

j. y;>.y*..y 9 W ~
4. m...., p 2
n. : ;g - y w f +..

~~.g. es.- w .mm- < r s

J..

1 s , y z %v.,,,. ; sc.: g w ,s < r. 7 z n>, m;;n.s .w, p. p, - q~ ,w

e f, y, _4 m

x pu,. m..; s w;~ v. agy i W 12 -1' r. + y-x ,m- +L

4%

s' ~ y y ~.. s 4 ,rhg .~{ - - 2moti.. :onlcofdm.thefIntervenor's t that -initia ted t t, he1 proceedings. . ~.... g.. l..rf/'.d, p' 8 %=, 4 - a. g iaganst": MessrsPlGrossmant and 'Tourtello' tte levelled ' M< 4 g ... ~, .Laer1'ousichargesi.against: the, staff!itself, z and.. alleged; h m. L c; / -.y .m 9'. r c. ~

r.......

+T, ( that, Messrs.. ;Grossman.1an'd bTourtellotte - filed s' ham. motion ' _H W a.' v .' fin 9an. attempt'toi. cover up? deficiencies in the Staff's~ 1 +,. \\, Motion Pursuant.to'10 C.F.R. 2.713 and H

perfo rmanc'e..

1 H' 10'C.F.R.c2;718fto.TakeLAppropriate. Actions Against ~ t -) 4 . Jame'sLThurtellott'e4and MiltoniGrossman, and the ) M + JRegulatoryLStaff,1 filed May' 16,- 1977.. Thus; the Staff ~ hasian iriter s'tiin the exonerat' ion of. Messrs.. ~ O. b r. Tourtellotte and.Grossman that even goes.beyond a desire E to. protect 1 colleagues.. . [e ] At?the'prehearing conference on January 9, 1978, ~* a Staff:counciliannoun~ced that, even though the. charges ?,. 1 against Hessrs.fGrossmar and Tourtellotte were' preferred-byotheIMidland..cBoard, the1 Staff wouldLnot undertake. j.. their prosecution:because. the; staff doubted their merit.. v E Hearing 'Janusry 9,.1978, Transcript,. at pp. '56-57. Under ~ v . these ec'ircumstances;it-'is obviously inappropriate for y ~ the >Staffito prosecute Ethe charges against Messrs. ( .g Gros'sman Tiandi Tourtellotite. e, .+ e j 3 L _ '. 7 s b' G O' ' s g. Q q;, -:.u -., ,a f i gy' %. M: ' h. i; sd"- W.: W,' .j e f' GN : + y .+: j+. ~ 4' + 6 j,,, ,+ 2 y,,_ ' ;f G 7

wa A [

O j,,,' ; M',f'; . L.~' _j s< w n hl !. ?-f.h' ;b l~ + ; 3',, y + y5(i s 4 . k = ,,.,~ k.. L-gN >l" { 1 % jf Q & Q?,~ -',. " 3;~ T'5 N

  • jf.: l. -

- a; myg;hdM( y wa "' l , 4 /;w m.. n' 3y +- ~ a

,,+

^ d ?:~ '- 4., o - 4 s c i ds w :, m s, w p w ; w ;.;;+ w w..,,:<.a.. - -- e- - x- ? ~,mtm:- -- - s ;, w a n1 m. - : ur - w

$,-m$.;+& a v.%.,,s.c n m.: N L N :: M; e, %:/q&Nba?, sMhk W b %am A-w,m%.n, - g. ;e - pc,i q ' f -.w. m o &, , r en,

.e,

e m f %g ' W-42W928 fh:%,s %r v ,s w s 7;/ ev 4%. .no> Q,' X.. <: J' L %mW.7 ? -" w-yf;l M ' W ; K:w.e: w-c. ; v. ..,') W. *:& Q w 's; h,)

  • W m

L paf. s r w L R.s D. Qw"f -g ! pt.' flp.?ql.f 4W" Dwl:

w

^ A. 's a 'w-b ',.'- n Q.. i <f. ht: -h=. ~ ',.p~ ..,.L n%g m, e p.y awau w.rm, a. +

+

u. b Ofh , h '{ j ' D W *% '., N' w4 'n, $'y v('".e3 ,=< Q"* ' g;e1"3 4.'s ),' d utg a ; ~ u.m +, } s gGrWh I M' w. '1 '.:,'I .,5. i n y e n u.. m.' a~; f.. w. m ~ w. g. <: g y .g am.m - w

y
c.-
... m-w

.... 8.m-a. r ; n.4 -L t ~ ' v, .n e nw r. . v p p n% y9..,.- n c< /,, e n, ,en.y:, e. 2 w e,w,fy r; p,e.a. ru..q t......,._ <... y j,, ;.q m%,,e> m%p m . c <u e w.x', m ass a y y 4 g r? 3,

3. 7.; g.,..-A,,
,4..,3 s s
.,s T M. M J N,..., N'iC D AppointmentVof: Special;OutsidF Coun' sell, s.w, 9

ghp % ;g !L2 ^ C' ' d, ., ~ MV FM%g y?(:8toGProsecute(the Charges Agains't'JMessrs.' W $N U70r6ssaanTandoTourtellotte is Within thei D-y s @g n,.,, 7., 4; N., v 1 PowerJ cf ?This LSD'ecia10 Board m. m r e.

R.+

N, t ~4;1, n y y o, ,, :t, y; e', ?aM 1.,

Jy, GJ, '

w .r, v. 3, g e. u ...,.+,t~. v. V m e ? ' M,. ;[+M ' TM ". - LThi.siBoard3hasl,a3" duty to conduct 1, a' fairia'nd 7 9 (' ..-.,.,1.1. e, y q- -. g.,,

4,.,

- e. a^ 0 ,m g< . g . (- n NF ' T '" " ;.. impartial 4 hearing;accordingf t'o[ law.;;.g.." ~10 C.F.R( n. c c" mn, 1 , / g,. [, -d '. ' ' [$ -[ ~* ' J $~ 2~.I"18;f.10 JC.'F.R. U $12 721(d). f.%'. J' ,3 _.{,,. ,.rm til + -

  • Beca0se of'thei i1

.- s + -W t .sc ,e 4 ' .V.. .< -.. G. t extraordinary. posture'..ofJ,the; present1 parties :in'(this", 'M p? .? ~ . ~... s.. + .c a. e ,y. 7.] " p r o c~e seding U this ;dutyt, requires s thej appointmentLof ispecial" U a , + ,n. ), ,. a.- l -m .... ~ m s -loutsidez counsel,' to T prosecutec the 2 charges?a...- W1_ / ' ^ gainst' Messes.- .m ~.

  • a

^ e L - ,s - -........ - i.,. %ge 7' E-1

G'Nrossman c and sTour tell'ottek See ' Unit'
  • ed% States 'v. ? Cowan,-

3..e ,.x ,6

n._...... y 7

,a ,ws ,y "? 3 9.6 E F..c ;Su, pp. 8031 ( N. D. J Tex'.M1.9 7. 4 ). ',1 rev'dEoniother-d

w.,

,s ~ q n:.

~..

Cir.x1975),No ert. 2d eriied., ~ H igrounds,d524LF.2d?5045(5th:. 4:. .. ~ @I.[,, m j I [.. -. + 7.m" ~ # i sub n'om.9 Woodruff' v.. United s States,M25tU.S'. 971 (1976).

d

~ e s .p G . % _y, /,.[- .y.,, '3 r e. 1l @W '0.9"(Ind y1963);fState v.iteigh,;289'P.2d 774,f777.(K.ansas-O ~itatelv'.tSpencer: Circuit? Court,y194LN.E.2d 606p 608-o ~ - + -5 X .,~. n ~. (,+w? ~ 1955); tin re Shell W.2 A.2dL809,1 814:(Pa.1 1938).-'In' d ~ 3 m ~ p.i Cowan,, theJdistrictEcourtL foun'd '.that there:Iis in'herent. ~. P# power "tofeff'ect' the, proper < and: orderlyD, administration nl I 7. t 4 My h' of justice" :bycaphintingMspecial? prosecutor _where + p ~ 7, 2 M, , 7theb governmentddec11nesito 7 carry; out "its. responsibility ~j e rT .s._ f ^- 3 WMV > ltoj prosecuteL i3961.FWSupp?a't: 804'.e [4 ~ e a c. y 5 * ( ^ ;: m ' }"~' M;p'~ - - ~ , ~ .Indeed,ithereyareinumerousfsituations;in which .w h h N.. r; 3

m...

s. w - ewe - s;.. g Lg, W.. 4..japacial[counselihave...beenimppointed totprosecute1 charges X w;W ;s ~. m m.;'w. c+ J-- E C,f. n @N. n% rNp ' ?of.Finiscon, d;u. ct, din.Si'tdati'on' a where "theppar ~ ^ s w m.< n ~.p' [..K.. - ?* {,m'+, 3 - 5 s

b. W. A.., f o

g.,, - ,,a a ;% <- m.#- p.", a s i f ,, h - n. ' v &y. =.e. ~,_ wp

J:b 4%: y; p K w'.Q j.. a t

M.^s. y .,li,,.& '9, S. ', N L; $' e ~ ~ ';7 n J /' L' s ' up - Q.) g,y v' gj:m:: pc

  • k

' ~ ~ > gm[. f. n4'^; + .a.. er* q w. %.;s.s g.. ; g.>. m, :, W c.w m.%, !. ~ .~.t n c f w.g h,e p

J:; -

z E.y * ' y 1.,; 6 m.. .r Nf, .j- .l i,c.,, ; ' ,,u < q^f sE > n g c.$ J . - ~ @V.C Mg; 3...e*

l. ' ' cgy...N. J. M d:"rf4

~. d C: N&'<:n% :.., .hsO. V _ % e : e r% mF;)A. M_", . o .0 y

  • c s(

w. n, y w.m,,,, u.4 F.e.%,)M'"J t'g* M.7. * '-Y ,}y 4 u .'4,.,..

g. i s ' -

p 4p: Wg ^ v. g.m. a., ew, o f* f, < ~. -i _ % [; 1;.~1 s g;;r % : M. 'Nk. ~gy [kM. T W^, .10 q W 6 t 'W{ c' r

w. x m....s$. f *,. ",.. T,,:

.h.- 3.:.... n,M .. h .-.~;., 'x' ' 1 u t.c. 3 J;,,. y h $' p, hgl

  • *
  • kA S,

'f .( ,,'.T .c .,. m.,, p s w .P /. .a 4* [=8.- .i4 g{ I. j' g %; 'h&N ~Yffh'[! hh ifY V A $'.h; m.: m! 7 f lll-Qt: 1 ~ wpm :n'M of+. L M y W @ JW'% F.-d C @ w w @ &. g w m.gaw .g m . v m o.m m ps. g ~i.:. W.MM.LWG.3P: bd G.yW ? w ~.*c w@m 2 ygw:MQfg x %~, t rF; M.m. " ' '. r_r..,5-N. - ~ /J

  • 9 eyp.,z y %%ww,.w L 6W, r.eWWV',. ' 2 VMW,RW:MMY., 4 J ' m:w~ 6 w + +.:

w-e

 %..p u409 ~

e n r y;ql 'd ; ^ j,' };;f'Q ',, s 9L. K - >,u a,.m.:y.. 3,% ' > n' ~ nwa .;^ M %

p m.fg; g N,n :c,.m %> e M W w w @ w w yw m @ m n M M h M % ?f W T

  • W Q = = %" M

~ W #..w,.& m > > ; *, 1',. a s Wg

m. M %mm, u e. 1..c ~

1.. m-t r + p y ; w - @, 4 ..y .t ,n- &. %v :' p % q/p,g"n Qqty g,D:y M p p. %.e 3 v -r: 7'm mf y, - f4 n ;'- w s.- - --a j c .s s we s w c m .e c >k,M.h;[m mwyx, LAM! w W.k a.8 s w ng w:.w,p pw , n[gf ag x,w[N M:jk. m. ~ c ya ~ n, \\., s : c

Mi f ;
'

n.,, .s n e. sw .- w Ith ~ ' s c.' +[+ y w', g - .m Q'.5 i k-M "x::e' ~ , ' ' W f a v- -A n W V lo p., .r v, f N ,r.y =., n' N

A'T-

, ! l,$. m4. x'.y' '. e m;S.v%.,,, r a a,3, av r 3,Q:g-y ; 2 .4 i g %s y,~W@ N.,s@su, c,hDrespon. 'aib,ilityiwo,uld ' properly f fallEcannot n,o t so ? - ..e s . mn , y. li.T * ,~ O M$. : >v {.. ~A ' ibecau~seTofLan inherent ; conflict.- _ The;aostjnotable c-y _ ~_ ty-o.m 'p: x*% y b % w. u.-,5^,. Jd- %y r. a 3, s _y N.y ' ; R:p > 1 example,ioficourse, was.;that; the Watargete :Special: x. w n s c,. m c ,.v. v. s, Hj aProsecutor.rseel.38F.R.(146883 June;4,"1973);i28-U.S.'C. "f ..; ne.c' .s ' 3 ... t. <,.. x, . cc. a a c

4. 510.m AdditionalSexamples include -the), appointment-

' f] - "s y n. i ~ . c f 1, -, l y / orqSpecial"? Counsel' l t"Y[{o; Investigate th *e.;Kor'l' ea,, n c P' aymen ts ~ 9.Q -d

  • =,, #

? - -.-*,., e e ~,, ~

q

(., sc.andal,tandy the' sppointmentj of ' entire? staffs 'of aspecial-

  • E l s

'7 - 1 .w.. s

lr *counse'l'totinvestigate'and/ prosecute
police and-judicial:

3 \\ 1 3.. w , r. Yorkiand Chicago'.jj-J n; ':,corruptioniinitheToities.of N : ~x ', w s .u y - e . b '. iThentildland Board orders ofl November 11 and: 1 R .y . ~w _n: + , m;,. ' _ Decembef 7f plainlyf mandate. this : prosecut'iori ofs the. charges - 1 ~ ~ s# :againstl. Messrs. Grossman and'Tourtellotte. Cf. DeV1. tot S( t '.v.JShultz[30'0!r.1Supp./3811(D1DlC.;1969)..Section s i' 2.713(c.,)-ofithe-NRC Rules:ofiPractice requires that '7 pt - ."'.~ ^4 y:f,. - 1/ Inp. recommending the: creation.of at special. e_Of 'd in

prosecutor's office, the Knapp.-Commission correctly 4

h, observed {that:' i -[a 3% 1"(D. A. 'sl work:so closely-with: policemen E ik9 Jthat9the;.public tends to look;upon. ~. 9s them --31ndeedqthen seem toelo'ok upon -a ^ ' tthemselves ..as allies of the r C W_ ^ L 7 De partment. " R Re po rt Lof Commission ' (, ': a W < to "In've'stigate 7 Allegations " of.. Police " !CorruptionrinfNew York) Summary and ~ : e @q, :y ; , m p. 5 M. SPriteipalFRecommendaticas'at 13;(AuCust' (

w. a. g - ott (1972) C c

m c f -^ '; ~, &k : .h:~~, ~, y r\\ " ^ ' y[4 W : @7. C See 2: F C L.

F"TFosecutorb,7 "New? York StiatNs1 Office of the Special I

Nadjari-D A

iA7 Creation 1B.orn of Necess'ity,"e2 Hofstra M-Q
g. 4 d'vMMNRev W97 W120 ~( 1,974). -

'e -*s -s 4 s 4 h. '_.' Y : l Y

h f

., c ;9;p*., ' ,y .A.r.,, r

f ~
L.

a: .m. ' Wy.,. ,W Y R..U x - w ~;. y r Ac,99N e;.'Q <W',s ? $' 4 f;, s ~ 4 v , g*C % M y, y,.yMp h ' $.a' w'y^p..'y , QQ g.. ~ r+g v .w r g @. MHj:; -m [M m f...,. ' 7,y$.n g e$.ep_p g-i 4 k ap m g, 2.f;gL'b.m. Qy . '. -g9 s g cv m.. 4 $[ ..g $ h. Okf ~? h fY..

P b

?. Y Y $a $ h h b $ ? Y !$ m +k r y p ? l_ 5b .kV? ~ ~"Y' wa{- ^ mw ;%?#3W:::: ug@,..t~ nw .mxv ca .,;W ' wr m>gyu W&c . P w. ^

a

% DS .g %cW' % -N ' - 4.. ' ~- ,s' s + 1 ~, l ~ l I r

7.,m ~mn

n d.,wm p...

.m p. m.; n.- w

3. - --

~? a.c+ms. si:.n+4 g}.'fh14x.n.y '-

',, + A,m* j f.
f. N y

~ dy '4V;";- 7 7w,g,s. ,j [.

l, -

s. - ;z ', ~ ~ jf O. ..m~- , )s 4 w i

  • ~,.,,, ;.

,m .a w n ,i

l, w..

E r. m L_ P. m 2 . e _. ~15--

g.,

3 -

  • m 1

i 1 ~- ,? ~ b n s ~1 i k /

a. h' earing "shall b'e fafford'e'd." - 10 C. F. R.. S' '2 '. 713 ( c ).

t-m fi_ f,.4 - ,It'iscclear,that'this Board'is.notithe(proper-party; f_ [is... -.to (prosecute thes'e s charges.g,: ' MoFeover,L this _ e fk.. c _re'sp'onsibil' ity cannot properlk< be: assigned; to thei gy, w b ..Intervenors. Rather, as. demonstrated above,'this 4 I [ ~

prosecution.isitheurehponsibilit'y of-the'. Commission --

u, -. S.. 4 1 .t, .the' party which preferred these charges.- x. However, noti U1 i onlylhas the-Commission. Staff indicated-its unwillingness . to ' prosecute, jbut it' would ; bef entirely'. improper for : .d =. 0 the Staff to do so.in.this! case. ~ In tho'present postnre, "aLfair and impartial 9 -hearihg" ~on'these chargesiwould:be impossible. ~ 4 n Accordingly, this'. case; demands appointment of special-outside-counsel. to prosecutef the charges, against Messrs. A

Grbssman.and Tourtellotte.

4

3 a,
s-

.-l y r-I t

  1. ~.

(

2/

As' Judge-! Learned Hand ~ warned in United States v. [, Earza'no,x149 F.2d.923 (2d.cir.?1945): N

.a

(" Prosecution and judgment 3are two~quite. .u& w-idistinct" functions.in the' administration C/, ,4 b > of~jnstice;fthey,mustfnot' merge." ..r..,

4. V 1149l F.'2d Lat ;926.;

. s c x. 3,.. ~, s ~

3..

%~ s gr 'O y ~ 11 1 ' 'e' s ny cg.. v. .) yr y' N- ^9 ' '..?. 4, fj'. ;f 'l. [ .'V2, t, (,' h%fl0$.k ~ J, ' P ~%W-y ',- [p -l.Y q~ l*, g l), Ml J' d' m - -b ~ ~

W t C, M M S %m.A%aFl.u/an",MY_v, M.~, @J. > bM W 'MMW.*M Ml m w n:c, s u%a n.e: g*

~4 g~=*
  • w

.w. n a. n ? s'% ~

n., - 4 +,;'

cp, t a.p fn ' L... *:p 84 Q P % A s % z %ure x g w, q mgla >,- g nwy-m

f. ' e g% v'Na r); *\\r %.m i nv m %m<,3c gu'- ~ av -

J.o '. r 1 ~ n.. 3- > + 3 4,. G._- ffgNw e m,4p M ^,y.. - c..- . m,... " ; g,, yygge/:s .L-k v w : n % w ,w m"7-e 7 .g ( e v a WW mp y.q :.s w~.:.. ':- s n V

8.

. r. .- < v - m. n > ), 3&.. p.. ~, n:, n:- ,.- Q fu r.4. L. r .W.,.. -w~ , ;y,.. c m. .. ~- s + < + g m w :2. n.y.r+;.s 4 + ~- s. ,_ey< 4 s (, e L. A p. e # m, .c g em

+ V; y p.yh.

s , m.} @. ev6~ >t >", <r s u rts v,,pp qy' s' ..~ i .-,e w' #c,.e.<gc< w-, '!'. N. _.N f.k A /h. 3M'x'< '. s '.,'._,M I a 'M 7 v. U,j.. i : i e : m f 7 ~ 9 3 e.; 4.. V 3 r. -.m,s gg3 u 2 ; s_ g. p*, n. a. y' e,. w g.r. s((w_ ~ g ,p a'- + - .v . 3: < n. yye y j u.. e ,.n _p,- e .~ -e ;. m.9.. m. . 3.,s e 6 ..f m s 3 .a. .. w .i..-. - ~, .e e., wt m <, m,4.#

w., w. m... s m.....

y. ,s .,p. ~n .i gn ,s' >s J@pld/ Au.,. 1, 6 CONCLUSION %,.jo .r, g

n v n v

' t N,. .r ~ _ w:. n : a ~ ,% 9<~o. .L., ~ ,i Wk:p.c., s m <Tc 'v. 9 r ,,r -. r., p e y ~a >. z. Yn w .-f p.. [w: z, -hM4 E[M,.Foritheiforegoing. reasons,.;thielSaginaw? s + ..,g. <w, n/s 31 n. 2 ' '. 7,,: q.. ~ i,Q.i D L; .iIs,tervenorsfurg:e.(thatethis' notion-be. grant'ed.-. c s s u,. .~ ;. g, f.,N..- 9'c M4. w m.m,, r. }4 q .ac.q c w w

  1. .., v.

I- ..*'*( '.,.v,. $-'W.- -. f t y..- ,/ ' ~ s / .s q-y m.,. 3 c 3, e?,

y

.~

  • V Respectfully; submitted,-

.w c m-- e g ,.o ,= ,a p; w u. m - f w T -- .f a 1 u s a :, i y -3 l )Ts' g& b y,Q TQpub c +_ 7.s- _g w:: - =MiltonM.. Freeman 4 n -,,,', M, : - ,Stuart' Land: +

David : B.onderman ',

4 W: a ? ? Rosalind,C.JCohen. q ' A ! Patrick! Grant ~ ' ~ k E

LawrencetV. Stein

+ n. e ., ' ' ~. n %~ ,C -% W~ Arnold:;&: Porter. y.m.v-3 77-e

4, 012293 Nineteenth Street, N.W.

w, e ' IWashinston,(D;C.9 20036 - qg~ J f 4 6, .b m _,Q 4 g' x .@' y'7 w' g ,A. m %pecial5 Counsel S 1 q,. f, rop-SaginawsIntervenors 1 1.-

  1. ~ -

a n a m__~~ - 4',

/

^! $, ~ ' , IDAt_.ed:: ? January 127X.1.978' 5 i s-f^':t ' I' ' h. 1 ,. 'i$ .k. j 4 'y y-t y .4 3.,f. p ! l;i^ -+ , M f. ',L s + '[.,, s n r yt eJ. n': y g, O S.'.Ig,' U .7. .q? .('5 - ), c 't ',,, r e ~ t r c.m o -, s; '.1, fh 3

  1. eH 3\\;

>:.n., .o ? 4 5 -p ,,g

9,y-4

,j i t 3 7 ,.. i _ c

s.. " 3 0 N,.

, 2 l',tV.q p . + .[ I r 3 y. d a. - M,,.- - :/ s y ,a .q; . h9. - m n s s ,vn.+, y -p. %_s _ - ry - + i v e -s a ^ j ~ f' y j hk\\ $I [ W,,.,' '.3 3. e o- _.s y ELM / ,l ~ d ,/.,...,, _.m f. , p u- } - + 3 u ~ m. n ' [, ,,v. ' q. O ( [ .D L I ( j 8b, p ] ", ab 'y[: Q !~ _ ff g;> w,w .-n Lst f'*

>, g
7,

.. -.2 a.b- . 4l. .s f s 4.x y ,n .v, ./(r._ s.. s., [pt.

W j$p'Q-,

4 -b 4 ,. 1 4 f s s;e.,. : 2. 1(' -s.y .; $.j w. n*L (\\, 1 --s 3 y,~ sr9 ')..',>s 1 ...c + ;s 1 p m.o+ 5,y r z ..,,. 9 ; m.g y ;, .,e a;. c a .sf s

  • sr s

--~, s g,/ v, u.

g o s a. 4;.

e; 4 -s%,m y, g s u. ~ '] 2 W., .,s.'3- - m .2.- Y r:s.{k. N^ h ?'. e..,p m n, &.. O. 1 h ->A w w.,. c e, v.. v ,,.gf % f,, s,4;...J-ji.7.,4.}, k :,. ]f .y y

,.f 2

w:gy y/1 F'; 3 v y e

a. M.. ea,&&,s,s~l:n,,y 3,u, m> --wm x

+p-m g ,.w ,. mm gg 3 3,:a, a r + 4W 9' ~8 e e L u y. ( < - Y. s <<.t. e a 3. e {y. v,. $ _ %_.Q._;'.y l'Y N}.d') ll%_ _ * 'f..i p_ Q ~ ~ j i --W l 3., 4.11._. g a', ,,,q p d,' "[ '.. g,. m. ,,,s w 1 h g ,9 .,g, P .,,e.yl' N :g d (n w[,$$ [ Q - M k I[lh( y ; _, q Abb s si, -.g;3 - 7>.- s.[., ,.,.5 w :1.L. n. 9: '. ",., r, -.s. e n. x. aw:;n m:me:m, ~n-x.n+gm.w -v n, s,:,u. ~ c - n ~.mm. uxw:m w m _ wkw m w wo s ) k s-e. w% -A w,.a r. m. kf G h M ih 'b U M' - / i}}