ML19344A068

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Ks 710922 Petition to Intervene or to Join Saginaw Intervenors Intervention.No Objection Raised to Joining Saginaw.Issues Re Spent Fuel Reprocessing & Transportation Are Outside Scope of Proceeding
ML19344A068
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 09/29/1971
From: Kartalia D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8007290918
Download: ML19344A068 (2)


Text

..

.. n..m;...,..

g- - - y - y m----

f h

h l

h

. v.:..g::b %*Jh. '.qw@p$

w w :%w w,.c! a w k a 4 g w : m. h vq n

~

x my x,. p; x a.,;.,m an u

@%mn ump

jf.g.,.mm.~ ; ' 9.n % 6;'~ g

^

syyW.

WW \\. GJ :; p~ ' &y % ny.wq a

v.,..

n

-5 A w?g

4 fy" g}

,.p; :. :A 4

" % nh

~

n,

~ = *.. a.: n.,N W ;

4

. Q } i Vh.

%,$% % $[$%$M,n _... ; nyr.;.w...cV W G x } x> k j~ - g f*, P jy.- )

.5 F.

~T ': -

, lQn 1

4, MM.a yE{mSQ j - y W W %p 'V., p g.M s r h y j

%n$gy.Q?y n

t W.

WU W ~ :

EROD{& UD

~1T~M A'

.n m:

n w w% ~ v GM'b:

a i

-a-

,.f W w d?N i - EdilITEDSTATES:0FTAMERICAe -

. @@ ; f@ h \\

@%f@ M f Ms.Mk MM. 4 Mah 1 JATOMICENERGYTCOMMISS10fN 1

g'[BIFOREMHE?A'T0MICSAFETfAllD;LICEMSIN

. T_ ES G "x.~M

)

r g $d4E N[L M,,y

. :;p

,,w

~~

~

f

..L; JS7g 5

~3 e

m,.

4. ;_ly - V w-

.8c.c..

L n:v v -,

n c

5O+

WlInsthematte'riofl. d l.

'n

~

CQ g &

2 i; CONSUMERS [PONERICOMPAry g

' m

- a -

),

g y.7 7<,4,_-

f; h/jlfj s.

Docket No 29

  • s

,R -.

m.

_gs.

s.-

.'t a

s.-(Mid" land l Plan'tr Units -1 :.and2);

j, s

g47 4,.

4

~

. ~&g g/.. ',

4 g=,g7

,c

, ;7,

7 g

9 qa M:.

'ANSUERz0FLAEr, REGULATORY' STAFF 1..

~

M. ~q,-,

~

~4 TO PETITIOT0F'THE STATE OF 5ANSAS "

~

]+

c..

n jy __ ;, _ __ _

.S

-On Septemben. 2.2.,19,71,'tho' Secretary of the. Atomic Energy _Comission -

~

s.

S rec $ived inf thefcaptiondd raatter La codinid petitioniand' notice filed

~

n i -

E'1 on! behalf!ofNhe! State"of Kansas bytits Attorn,ey LGeneral'.

By this:

~

a v

~

document, Kansas /(1) petitions for leave to' intervene'as a party pur-

, [I n

t

-suant' tollGfCFR 32.7,14;; and, as. an alternative, (2): petitions-for leavei

.e i

' ~

?ts " join in 'the tintervention"~of sintervenors Saginaw Valley Nuclear-q

~

s.

Sttdly. Group et ali; a'nd. as a further alternative. -(3) serves notico -

"

  • 6f its[ihitentto' participate in this proceeding as an interested State cg

%^

(

pursuard j;o 10lCFR 2.715(c).E I

dnsasindicatesinits;pleadingthattheissuesitseekstolitigate fin =this" proceeding already;have b' en raised by the Saginaw Valley inter '

e w

- 92nors:and are.in that' sense "not new to the proceeding".

In view ~of n

..l

'(y ', -.c,.

1

. - f c

e JThe:documentLis* addressed to '"The Atomic Energy Comission"; hcwever,

. f since the mattersLcontainedf therein are properly addressed to the pre-si. ding-Atomicf Safety:andclicensing Board. we respond as, if theyocument -

iwcref specifically' addressed to the Board, a % r,. -

~ _

U W: '

,.(j

~ e

,A;

,A:

^

"g

].,.,. T

.^

44

,,. p;

./

Q,, jy ',,,

%y s

f

~

.(

.s 3 f.s.',,-O e',..

4'-

' M.

g

+

~

aw;.k p pc :q. 47 v.; w

. _f a

'.' p %. -

~

a

a

k.,u. n,m m,a g % C

'k\\0'~

w:+ J.

WW. ;.lm.Wa ~ew&R '

vna x n, n wm w.,n+

wn

. w. xe w m m: W,p &m.nly.y

,+g,.nn v:.

n a ~n b

, fiy,

.:4:R m:. M3Fn@?nM R TWR

% %~CT %.f i

%j "O'

  1. N., l'
G% ~

L*

h.

1MM

%w g

A d c,' ;?

,r" a

n, n..r.. n. uw y< <

.,p.,s:s. w.s w x.. u.. n... ;

cw am mp. a.-

, c c1 a

,z

, ~

b

,, e

@k.w?. a,~y.o. ;WM, ' 8 ' W.

g y f\\

e N u...s.

N

.,e f.

g.u n w

y;;

-[

y

.k!$f

,&.^^, > ~,h

  • n f'k t_

' f. b Y

a' s

s w

7 y.

jp %; p g 2g e,,; g W

~~

=s u.:2 - *,

,n 4

N av w mm

~

i.;'*b-g 'fl{ k ey e x 93;;. s,,

g;.y 2

$3?l' khk. 4

Pji, 3,G p N "' )
].Y. a~ ).L. :w ?.,.lR
  • k *
h.
  • h.

3 4

'4

^

&. A Mthis"circumsOnce,;an. 'd on;tho Nnder,n'.-

a.

<r

~

~

r

... standing",that KansasLisfagreeableT W, s-w y

_aw. nny.

... m

~

M*f' Vl'fd" l'n Ib 3.#

5,- i 4

7

%w%ye;,

.(toijoining'inithe intersentionfof the:Saginaw Valley intervenors

..s

~ _

a

' j.

~

M) s LasSn$aiiternatiivelto (intervention as' a

  • party 2in;i.ts own? r...igh t, Lwe ~

q

,i g,,.

a-s:

3. _ r Board' allowed. Kansas to join. the>

. M s.

~

s

_..e x

.. e 7e dould haveTnolobjection Lif th.e: -.

.o s

J W-3

@'? n fK ESagihaw Valley,iiiterve_ntio' n.'

~ -~

r

~->

z.

es

+

m

  • /,,

,-i.

c.-

,,,,s 2

_,, ^

-F n

..~.. :

w

-AP e'.7

,,._p 3..

. y

.,.y y 3 e:

w

n m

........ ~

.~

( fi ('

We W: derstand 5thatiby " joining".the Saginaw Ya11eyeinterventio'n, -

?

c.

Y (Kansas wouldfin ef ect,iagree to be bouno by all{ rulings 1now in P

G v.

effect or hereaftergmade which are. applicable to.the Saginaw Valley.

i.

group generally; and Lthat the joinder of Kansas would not result-t..

~ iniduplicativeL presentations ~, evidentiary.or. otherwiso,oon behalf O.

u

..x s

g y'

."off the Saginaw: Valley group ~as enlarged.

+

y, s

m.

'We wish to make clear;that we -do 'not concede that Kansas is entitled R

tofparticipate in^this proceeding in its own right.

Nor do we concede d

1 W$.

. E.

that allsof the; issues' as to which Kansas has indicated concern are 0

.g e

v
  • ~

.within. the' scope of this p'roceeding.

Specifically, it is our position

'c+

. 4 (that issu,es;hs te.grocessing of spent fuel'and transportation and 4

.y

~ *

~

}

Plt:mateidisposal of high-level wastes' resulting from reprocessing L

4 t

n a.

s L

are outside 'the scope.of.this proce~ ding..

T 7

e m

4'7, o

w "4

Respectfully submitted,-

p 4

. 'l' i

i

& JL dd 3,.

~

f -

  • David E."Kartalia V

' Counsel for AEC Regulatory Staff y

m x<

e x...w,,u.

c

+P4r4 l

?Date(at8Ethesda, Maryland,

, 09 M[N th.is. 29th, day. of. Septembe'r,}l9711

~

+

w

,.;k

}4.;Ag w&& ;'..m.

~

~- ;;

Q' m.

< b;

~

.aca also anramaMa en tnh

.