ML19343C587

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Schedule for Filing Proposed Findings & Conclusions. Applicants Must File by 810424,intervenors by 810605,NRC by 810702 & Applicants Reply by 810903.Filings Will Not Prejudice Parties Right to Seek Reopening of Record
ML19343C587
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 03/20/1981
From: Bechhoefer C
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8103240546
Download: ML19343C587 (2)


Text

~

N

/

e' co w

/.i c

/h

- ~

N c

s z

m

,///

[fj/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 2

,i t ' ' 2 31981 iP 1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM41SSION

\\

88 T,

ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

{

p

\\

Before Administrative Judges:

4 Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman g@.fD g 28 Dr. Frank F. Hooper Dr. M. Stanley Livingston Jgg7

)

In'the Matter of:

)

CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC Docket No. 50-358 OL COMPANY, ET AL.

(William H. Zimmer Nuclear Station,

)

March 20, 1981 Operating License Proceeding)

)

)

SCHEDULE FOR FILING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS At the conclusice of the evidentiary hearing session on March 4, 1981, the Licensing Board established the following schedule _for the submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on all l

issues heard to date (Tr. 4634-4642):

-1.

Submission by Applicants: April 24,1981 l

2.

Submissions by intervenors: June 5,1981 3.

Submission by NRC Staff: July 2, 1981 4.

Reply by Apolicants: August 3, 1981 t

The Board permitted the foregoing extended time schedule (c_f_.10 CFR 52.754) because of the age of the proceeding, the length and complexity of the_ record, the circumstance that such filings would precede the final g

S

/

8108240 m L

G

-2 evidentiary hearing sessions, and the desire of the Board that parties have sufficient time to provide proposed findings and conclusions which will be helpful and will enable the Boara to render an initial decision as expeditiously as possible after the final hearing sessions. The

-filing of proposed findings and conclusions will not prejudice any party's right to seek a reopening of the record on any issue in the event of new ard significant information material to such an issue (Tr. 3614-16, 4635).

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD q.b.o ki6.YJ W

Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 20th day of March 1981.

l l

l 1