ML19343B766
| ML19343B766 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1980 |
| From: | Hukill H METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TLL-670, NUDOCS 8012300388 | |
| Download: ML19343B766 (4) | |
Text
.
Metropohtan Edison Canipany
=_ Vr.'
' [
]
Post Office Box CD I l ld l'
%cdletown, Pennsylvania 17057 Writer's Direct Deal Narnner December 22, 1980 TLL 670 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn:
T. M. Novak, Assistant Director Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Sir:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (EfI-1)
Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Additional Financial Information Enclosed please find responses to Items 3 and 4 of your letter of August 11, 1980, which supplements our responses of October 9, 1980 (TLL 574). The response includes Attachment C of our comments on the PEIS dated November 7, 1980 which updated "DiI-2 Program Recovery Estimate" ot~ August 1980 (attached).
Sincerely, D
H. D. 3 kill Director, DfI-l HDH:LWH:laa Enclosures l
l cc:
L. Barrett (w/o Attachments)
R. W. Reid (w/o Attachments)
I',
r
\\
l 9 \\
Q 0013300 l
38T Metrcool tan Ecson Company is a Mer ter of it e Gene ai Puctic Ut. tes Sgtem l
TLL 670 3.
Provide a detailed statement of the estimated cost recuired to safely decontaminate and complete fuel re= oval from TMI-2.
Indicate amounts attributable to engineering fees, outside centractors and consultants, physical installations, purchasing of equipment, other construction excenditures or physical services (specifyina descrintion), and contin 2encies, showing the cost estimate for each separate item as well as the aggregate total cost estimate for all such items. These estimates should be su=narized by major feature and/or component following, where feasible, the Uniform System of Accounts prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Co= mission, and should be sufficiently detailed so that the Commission can make a judgment as to the reasonableness of the costs.
4 4
e 2
4 i
w
,---wn e--
TLL 670 4
Provide a detailed schedule stating the amounts and timing of projected expenditures resulting from the cost estimates in recuest Item No. 3, above, showing total annual capital and total annual operating e.. pense requirements for the cleanup and describing completed and pro.jected actions for each period incurred.
I e
l l
l
r C
. mw...C an c_.= w~ ~..v..r.S n:r-.~ r
==:
==---v....=..-
A'C ASSTSSMI';T OF COSTS he preli-inary revisien to the schedule fer n!!-2 decentaminatice and fuel reneral refle::s :he i=pa : ef regula:ery constraints, including the PI 5 approvals and the processes described in I RIG-0695, and :he avail-ability of funds for cleanup. Tne effects of these develep=ents results in a proje::ed re eval of fuel in August 1985 versus April 1983 as depicted in our baseline schedule issued in August 1980 with the Proje:: Esti= ate.
I: is censidered reasenable te anticipate that the schedule extensien of 23 =enths =ay be conservative because of the centinuing regula: cry and financia1 constraints.
A prelimina y assessment cf the costs associated with the schedule extensien and future funding constraints is expected to increase the baseline es:i= ate by about $150 =1111on. The Projee: Esti= ate of August 1,1950 projected a ecs: ef abeu: St00 =1111on fre: 1981 to 1985. Added to this ces: is 1979 and 1980 costs of abou: 200 =illic:
and new an esti=ated schedule extension ces: of $150 =illien. This results in a preli=inary esti= ate fer ele.anup cest of about $750 =11-1 l
lien, in 1980 dellars. If the inflation ra:e is assumed to be 10 per-ent per year, this vould add about $250 =1111on and bring the total TM:-2 cleanup costs to approxi=ately $1 billion. This is $700 =illion ever l
l the $300 =illion of insurance coverage.
l l
l I