ML19341D586
| ML19341D586 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/1981 |
| From: | Keblusek S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103050908 | |
| Download: ML19341D586 (11) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:V 9 he prog'o, / UNITED STATES !?, m Ij NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -$ ' 9r., i c WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 'f gv...../ FES 13 ;c81 Docket No. 50-382 APPLICANT: Louisiana Power & Light Company FACILITY: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3
SUBJECT:
SUffARY OF CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETING AND SITE VISIT A meeting was held on January 13 - 15, 1981, in Taft, Louisiana with the applicant to discuss the status of construction of the facility. A tour of the site was made on January 14 and 15 to witness the status of construction. The agenda of the meeting is showr in Enclosure 1, the NRC proposed agenda is Enclosure 2, and the meeting attendees are listed in Enclosure 3. Enclosures 4 and 5 summarize the status and bulk performance of construction on Waterfc-J Unit No. 3 as of 12/28/80.
SUMMARY
The applicant and Ebasco, the architect engineer and constructor, made a detailed presentation of the status of plant construction and project scheduling. The Unit is presently 82% complete. The presentation focused on the applicant's dforts in identifying and dealing with potential problem areas. They feel confident that they can meet the October 1982 fuel load date for several reasons. These include increased financial comitments, built-in three month float in their schedule, and management attention (including President Wyatt) to all problems that could affect the schedule. The applicant believes that the only potential delay is the licensing process which they feel is four months behind schedule. The caseload forecast panel expressed concern about the rate at which electrical terminations m'Ist be made in order to complete constructica on schedule. The Ebasco Project i4 nager presented information on the electrical work schedule, which showed that n the past they have concentrated on cable trays and conduits. Now that those portions of the electrical work are nearly completed, they are concentrating on cable pulling and terminations. Cable pulling is presently 57% complete while terminations are 33% complete. The electrical work is now concentrating on these areas, and although the work must exceed industry averages in order to meet the schedule they believe that this is achievable. They point out that they achieved double the industry average in conduits, and tnat over the 10-90% range, the rate of cable pulling can fall slightly below the average and the rate of terminations need only be 5% higher than the average to meet the schedule. The staff, however, maintained that from 33-90% completion they will have to greatly exceed industry averages. Staff also questioned the cable pulling and termination schedule as it could potentially impact system 81030 5070tg,, A
~ FEB 13 icg; completion and turnover to LP&L. Ebasco has considered this potential problem and is planning to do some selective cable pulling in order to complete systems on schedule. Other potential problem ares: are pipe hangars, reactor internals alignment, tube track, plant operating procedures, TMI-related procurement, and plart staffing. After licensing, which is the critical path item, the safety injection system is the next most limiting item and is one and one-half months ahead of an October 1982 fuel-load date. This problem with the safety injection system was caused by more rework being required for fit up than anticipated. LP&L feels that their schedule is attainable because they have agressive management, built-in conservatism and a three month slack in their schedule. The caseload forecast panel took a detailed tour of the plant on January 14 and 15. In the course of this tour, the staff questioned the status of the control room. After the tour, the panel's concerns were adequately addressed. The tour also led the panel to ask why there ere not more electricians at work in the plant. The electrical subcontractor was asked to address this and his explanation was that 09 build up of the electrician work force was just beginning. After further discussions on Thursday, which included the basis for LP&L's financial connitments, the caseload forecast panel met privately to determine a new fuel load date for the Waterford Plant. After lengthy discussion, the panel concluded, with some reservation, that the October 1982 fuel load is attainable. However, the panel will return in mid-May to reassess the status of electrical work. If significant progress has not been made, the panel will revise the fuel load date. The panel pointed out that in the past LP&L has promised a high performance rate and failed to 1ttain it. E ,px.L N y S. Kebiusek, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/ enclosures: See next page
l Mr. D. L. Aswell Vice President, Power Production Louisiana Power & Light Company 142 Delaronde Street FEs y3 7ggI New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 cc: W. Malcolm Stevenson, Esq. Monroe & Lemann 1424 Whitney Building New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 Mr. E. Blake Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W. Washington, D. C. 20036 Mr. D. B. Lester Production Engineer Louisiana Power & Light Company 142 Delaronde Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 Lyman L. Jones, Jr., Esq. Gillespie & Jones 910 Security Homestead Building 4900 Veterans Memorial Boulevard Metairie, Louisiana 70002 Luke Fontana, Esq. Gillespie & Jones 824 Esplanade Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 7011A Stephen M. Irving, Esq. One American Place, Suite 1601 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825 Louisiana Office of Conservation ATTN: Administrator Nuclear Energy Division /. O. Box 14690 3aton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 President, Police Jury St. Charles Parrish Hahnville, Louisiana 70057 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ATTN: EIS Coordinator Region VI Office 1201 Elm Street First International Building Dallas, Texas 75270 e
ENCLOSURE 1 LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY RATERFORD SES - UNIT NO. 3 SITE PRESENTATION TO NRC CASE LOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETING AGENDA l. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF MEETING II. PRESENTATION A - ORGANIZATION B - PROJECT OVERVIEW C - CONSTRUCTION D - ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIALLY REPORTABLE INCIDENTS E - ENGINEERING / DESIGN AND PROCUREMENT F - START UP G - PLANT OPERATIONAL REVIEW H - PROJECT COMPARISONS ~ I -<
SUMMARY
OF HIGHLIGHTS AND HARD SPOTS Ill. TOUR OF SITE IV. DISCUSSIONS V. EXIT INTERVIEW . ~. _.
ENCLOSURE 2 WATERFORD UNIT 3 CASELOAD FORECAST PitHEL SITE VISIT MEETING AGENDA l. Overview of project construction schedule including progress and major milestones completed, current problems and any anticipated problem areas that may impact the current projected fuel load date. 2. Detailed review and current status of design and engineering effort (by major discipline) including any potential problems that may arise from necessary rework. 3. Detailed review and current status of procurement activities -including valves, pipe, instruments, cable, major components, etc. 4. Actual and proposed craf t work force (by major craft), craft availability, productivity, potential labor negotiations and problems. 5. Detailed review and current status of all large and small bore pipe hangers, restraints, snubbers, etc., including design, rework, procurement, fabrication, delivery and installation. 6. Detailed review of project schedule 'Jentifying critical path items, near critical items, amount c/ float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading, methods of implementation of corrective action for any activities with negative float, and provisions for contingencies. l The estimated project percent complete as of September 30, 1980. 7. Detailed review and current status of bulk quantities including i current estimated quantities, quantities installed to date, quantities scheduled to date, current percent complete for each, actual versus forecast installation rates, and basis for figures. (a) Concrete (CY) (b) Process Pipe (LF) Large Bore Pipe (21/2" and larger) Small Bore Pipe (2" and smaller) (c) Yard Pipe (LF) (d) Large Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints, Snubbers (ea)
.. (e) Small Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints.(ea) -(f) Cable Tray (LF) (g) Total Conduit (LF) (h) Total Exposed Metal Conduit (LF) (i) Cable (LF) - Power - Control - Security - Instrumentation Plant Lighting (;, ) Terminations (ea) - Power Control Security Instrumentation Plant Lighting (k) Electrical Circuits (ea) - Power Control - Security (1) Instrumentation (ea) 8. Detailed review cr.d curre,nt.stctus of preparation of preop and acceptance test procedures, integration of preop and acceptance test activities with construction schedule, system tL. Mver schedule, preop and acceptance tests schedule, current and p o-posed preop and acceptance tests program manpower. (a) Total number of procedures required for fuel load. (b) Number of draft procedures not started. (c) Number of draft procedures being written. (d) Number of procedures approved. (e) Number of procedures in review. (f) Total number of preop and acceptance. tests required for fuel load. (g) Number of preop and acceptance tests completed. (h) Number of preop and acceptance tests currently in progress. (i) Number of systems turned over to start-up.
3 9. Detailed discussion of potential schedular influence due to changes attributed to NUREG-0737 and other recent licensing requirements.
- 10. Site tour and observation of construction activities.
11. Discussion of schedular impact, if any, regarding potential deficiencies reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(e), 12. Financial comitments to complete the plant - l
ENCLOSURE 3 MEETING ATTENDEES i 1 Louisiana Poyer and Light
- G. McClendon, Senior Vice President O. Aswell, Vice President - Power Production L. Maurin, Project Director F. Drummond, Projr:t Manager D. Lester, Plant Manager T. Gerrets, QA Manager
- L. Bass, Project QA Engineer
- C. Decareaux, Project Construction Coordinator R. Prados, Engineer T. Armington, Start-Up Supervisor P. Gregory, Start-Up Cost / Scheduling Engineer P. Prasankumar, Maintenance Superintendent - Nuclear
- 0. K11est, Consumer Communication Representative Ebasco services Incoroorated
- J. Cernich, Regional Manager R. Stampley, Project Manager R. Milhiser, Site Manager J. Wills, Project Superintendent J. Padalino, Project Engineer J. Costello, Assistant Project Manager W. Pettigrew, Construction Control Superintendent N. Saar, Cost Scheduling Analyst Cerbustion Engineering F. Sernatinger, Project Manager NRC Farticioants, S. Kebiusek,1RR, Project Manager W. Lovelace, NRR, Engineer Specialist R. Stewart, IE, Project Inspector.
G. Constable, IE, Senior Resident Inspector
- Denotes only attended January 16, 1981, meeting.
ENCLOSURE 4 LOUISIANA F0WER & LIGHT COMPANY WATERFORD SES - UNIT N0 3 IULK PERF0PMANCE INSTALLED SCHEDULED 7. ACTIVITY CURRENT LaT t T 0-QUANTITY E ouANTITIES L/ _ (1 /3 .) COMDIETE OF SCH A) CONCRETE 206,480 20u,168 203,947 99.3 100.1 B) TOTAL PROCESS DIPE SY$$ BON $ kbO',0$! $$',hk$ 0'50$ lb$'$ C) YARD PIPE 38,435 36,091 34,776 93.9 103.8 D) LARGE BORE HANGERS, I RESTRAINTS, l SNUBBERS 6,629 5,593 5,638 84.4 99.2 E) SMALL BORE HANGERS INCLUDED WITH SitALL BORE PIPE F) CABLE TRAY
- 42,382 42,382 42,332 100.0 100.0 G)
L EXPOSED CONDUIT
- TOTA (EXCLUDING l
l LIGHTING) 503,794 454,662 424,963 90.2 107,0 C#8h0wER*/ 970,124 689,921 665,412 71.1 103.7 CONTROL 641 2,541,196 57.6 97,9 INSTRUMENT
- 4,jlZ,675 2,488,860 62,811 SECURITY ess,80u LIGHTING
- 75.4
!) TERMINATIONS l POWER" 18,990 6,237 6,000 32.8 10f!. 0 i CONTROL / INSTRUMENT
- 197,280 65,0-075 80,0-459 33.0 82.0
- SECURITY 4,466 LIGHTING 75.4 { J) Ej.I.CIB.LCAL CI RCUITS POWER 2,022 i CONTROL / 17, [h. INSTRUMENT h SECURITY "SWA/ RETROFIT MANHOURS NOT INCLUDED IN UNIT RATES
ENCLOSURE 5 l0UISIANA PWER & LIGar CafANY WATERFORD SES UNIT NO. 3 1980 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS CURRE!i INSTAU.ED, INSTALLED INSTALLATION ESTU%TE 12/30/79 12/28/80 l.ARGEBORE. PIPE 108R5 u: 85 95 L.ARGEBOREtlANGERS 6,629 EA 68 84 SMALLBOREPIPE 100,013 LF 58 82 CABLEIRAY 42,382 LF 99 100 EXPOSEDCot0VIT 503,794 LF 48 90 PNER & CGHROL CABLE 5,581,600 tc 29 57 TERMINATINS 216,270 EA 14 33 IMC bucT 1,092,072 La 70 93 IWACSUPPORTS 8%,642 La 89 95 INSTRUMENTTusING 105,519 LF 11 53 IN TRlNENT PKKS, CABINETS, ELS 143 EA 71 76 b/81 i w ,g-W g. we -q_.- .m,, ,. _, _,,.9m
.e
- 3 i
MEETING SUMARY DI' TRIBUTION % 1 3 Iggy Docket. File D. Muller MPORi:l% R. Bcilard Local PDR W. R(gan NSIC D. Rcss TIC P. Cteck TERA R. Satterfield O. Pc rr LB #2 File' F. Rc sa 3 ,y 1 H. Denton W. Betler /s/ 9 e E. Case W. Keeger fl'1 f$2 D. Eisenhut R. Hc uston i -! 't3 ' g. R. Purple T. Mtephy {)-{ s 6 7 B. J. Youngblood L. Rtoenstein A. Schwencer T. Sreis / \\\\ $g F. Miraglia W. Jcanston J. Miller J. Stalz ' 'q, G. Lainas S. Hanauer R. Vollmer W. Ga mill ~ J. P. Knight F. Scaroeder R. Bosnak D. Sk;/ holt F. Schauer M. Erast R. E. Jackson it. Baer Project fianager 3 M lo St k C. Beelinger Licensing Assistant MService K. Kniel Attorney, OELD G. Knighton I&E (3) A. TFidani ACRS (16) D. Tcadi R. Tedesco D. Vassallo G. Lear ' J. Kr;mer V. Noonan P. Cellins S. Pawlicki D. Zi?mann V. Benaroya S. Ra aos Z. Rosztoczy S. Scawartz W. Haass NDC
Participants:
Others: - Q.L.oVC\\L C-6 BCC: Applicant & Service List j _}}