ML19341D269
| ML19341D269 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07001113 |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1981 |
| From: | Gibson A, Woodruff R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19341D258 | List: |
| References | |
| 70-1113-80-20, NUDOCS 8103050255 | |
| Download: ML19341D269 (3) | |
Text
I pe nsa
' (N m%,
UNITED STATES k 'yk,em.,7 T NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
g s
REGION 11
.h' j
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUIT E 3100 o,
6
's,,e g ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report fio. 70-1113/30-20 Licensee:
General Electric Ccepany Wilmington, fiC 28401 Docket tio. 70-1113 License !!o. 5 D;-1097 Inspection at Wilmington, NC Inspector:
__Mg 2[drr /
Date Signed
- x. L 'aooarurf v
2/df/
Approved by: /k Date Si'gned A. F. Gi6 son, Sec lon Chie, FFMS Branch EUMMARY Inspection on tiovember 17, 1980 Areas Inspected This special, announced inspection involved 16 inspector-hours onsite in the areas of groundwater environmental monitoring.
Results In the area inspected, no i* ems of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Recommendations for improvement of the groundwater monitoring program which were identified by the f!RC consultant rc resentatives are being referred to the e
Office of fluclear Material Safety and Safeguards for their consideration.
i nososo 3
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. A. Long, General Manager
- A. L. Kaplan, Manager, Licensing and Compliance Audits
- W. B. Haverty, Compliance Auditor
- W. B. Smalley, Senior Engineer NRC Consultant Representatives
- E. B. Fowler, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL)
- E. W. Essington, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL)
- W. L. Polzer, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL)
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on November 17, 1980 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.
3.
Purpose The purpose of this inspection was to review the groundwater monitoring practices and to reevaluate the adequacy of the groundwater monitoring program with respect to detection and quantification of any migration of radiological and nonradiological contaminants in the soil.
4.
Consultant Review The three (LASL) consultant representatives identified in paragraph 1 above, conducted a general site review, interviewed licensee representa-tives, and reviewed specific site data to determine or evaluate the following:
(a) identification of isotopes that could be released into the soil, their chemical and physical forms, level of activity and volume of discharge; (b) waste treatment systems, including both sanitary and chemical systems and their respective transfer hold-up, and storage features; (c) the environmental mo'nitoring systems for on-site and off-site detection, including air, vegetation, soil, surface water, groundwater, i
and potable water sampling; (d) annlytical procedures used by the licensee for environmental sample evaluation, including sample collection, frequency of sampling, sample preparations, radiological analysis, quality control; and (e) hydrology data relative to groundwater monitoring.
No itens of noncompliance concerning monitoring requirements in the facility license were identified.
5.
Consul tant Recommendations Following the review of current groundwater monitoring practices, the l
consultants discussed with licensee management several recommendations l
l 1
r
! i i
to refine the current methods of detection of waste migration or j
provide more comprehensive documentation.
These recommendations i
will be referred to the Office of i;uclear Materials Safety and l
Safeguards for consideration or possible licensing action.
l i
i i
)
i l
l
- l i
d l
l l
.