ML19341C932

First Interim Deficiency Rept,Originally Reported on 810127 & 0203,re Deficient Drawing & Document Control.Sixteen Drawings Not Mutilated When New Revisions Received & Drawings Not Updated.Will Submit Final Rept by 810316

ML19341C932
Person / Time
Site:	Hartsville
Issue date:	02/26/1981
From:	Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, NUDOCS 8103040559
Download: ML19341C932 (3)

Text

_ . _ . _

3 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 374ot 400 Chestnut Street Tower II 4

s February 26, 1981 HTRD-50-518. -519, -520, -521/81-05

A Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II - Suite 3100 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

. HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT - REPORTABLE DEFICIENCY - DEFICIENT DRAWING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL - HTRD-50-518, -519, -520, -521/81-05 The subject deficiency was initially reported to NRC-0IE, Region II, Inspector R. W. Wright on January 27 and February 3, 1981, as

~

HT-G-81-06 deficiencies 1 and 2, respectively. In compliance with paragraph 50.55(e) of 10 CFR Part 50, we are enclosing the first 3

interim report on the subject deficiency. We anticipate transmitting the final report on or before March 16, 1981. This i nonconformance will be resolved along with TVA's response to your letter dated January 30, 1981, Confirmation of Action, as discussed with F. S. Cantrell on February 24, 1981. If you have any questions, please call Jim Domer at FTS 857-2014.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY L. M. Mills, Manager Nuclear Regulaf.lon and Safety Enclosure cc: Mr. Victor Stello, Director (Enclosure)

Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

nhkg bhftf5 Y hf$ $

l s

9/ //  %

n ll s g, s 8 -

810304055',

g wocowsereow

[

ENCLOSURE HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT

DEFICIENT DRAWING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL HTRD-50-518, -519, -520, -521/81-05

) 10CFR50.55(e)

REPORT NO. 1 (INTERIM)

On January 27, 1981, TVA informed NRC-0IE, Region II Inspector, R. W. Wright, of a potentially reportable condition under 10 CFR Part 50.55(e) regarding deficient drawing control. On February 3, 1981, TVA informed NRC-0IE, Region II Inspector, R. W. Wright, of.a similar potentially reportable condition regarding deficient document control.

This is the first interim report en these deficiencies. We expect to submit our final report by March 16, 1981.

Description of Deficiency This audit deficiency identified 26 deficient drawings. A review of these drawings disclosed the following:

Sixteen drawings had not been mutilated when new revisions were received.

Four drawings were not updated because the recipient had requested his drawings to be deleted from the distribution list but did not return or mutilate the previously issued drawings.

Four drawings were not updaced because the recipient was not on the distribution list due to DCU error.

One drawing was not mutilated when an insufficient quantity of newly revised drawings was received.

The cause could not be determined on the one remaining drawing due to inadequate information in the audit.

The results indicate that the cause in the majority of cited instances was a lack of understanding of the drawing control program by drawing recipients and, to a ' esser extent, a lack of care by DCU personnel in the completion of deswing ledger cards and in the maintenance of the suspense file. One of the errors in distribution was due to a duplication of ledger cards; both cards were necessary to identify all recipients. Another possible distribution problem was identified by evidence of a transmittal memorandum in the suspense file which had not been acknowledged.

m 4

m .- , +y y e - _..

-2 Additional contributing factors identified were:

i A. Second shift craft personnel have been obtaining their drawings directly from the DCU.

B. Some craft personnel have been receiving drawings, FCR's, and ECN's from engineering. personnel rather than from the DCU.

Corrective Action TVA is investigating these audit deficiencies in conjunction with J. P. O'Reilly's Confirmation of Action letter dated January 30, 1981.

• We will provide the corrective action in our final response to'these deficiencies.

t 4

e . .

i l

3 A

1 a

l 4

1 9

e i

w ,-a, w , , - , . , , , ----,c - - y -r-..nm,. , . -- r ,,.. , , - - - -- , , ~m , ,- r