ML19341B224
| ML19341B224 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1981 |
| From: | Mcgaughy J MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, AECM-81-45, NUDOCS 8101300475 | |
| Download: ML19341B224 (2) | |
Text
wen f
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Helping Build Mississippi P. O. B O X 1640. J AC K S O N, MIS SIS SlF PI 3 9 2 0 5 T,CM"Jf January 23, 1981 Office of Inspection & Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Attention:
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
SUBJECT:
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-416/417 File 0260/15525/15526 PRD-80/47, Interim Report No. 2, Supplier Drawing Fevision Notice Program AECM-81/45
Reference:
AECM-80/207, 9/5/80 On August 6,1980, Mississippi Power & Light Company notified Mr. M. Hunt of your office of a Potentially Reportable Deficiency (PRD) at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (GGNS) construction site.
The deficiency concerne the inadequate control of Supplier Drawing Revision Notices (SDRN) Program., Attached is our Interim Report No. 2.
We expect to complete our investigation and submit a final report by April 28, 1981.
Please note that this report was due on January 22, 1981.
How-ever, per a telephone conversation with Mr. Jack Bryant of your of-fice on January 21, 1981, our T. E. Reaves, Jr. obtained an extension for this report to this date.
~
Yours truly, 30g
~
J. P. McGaughy, Jr.
CWH:mt Attachm'nt cc-Mr. N. L. Stampley bM[
ctor Stello, Director Mr. G. B. Taylor Mr. R. B. McGehee Div. of Insp. & Enforcement South Miss. Electric Mr. T. B. Conner U. S. Nuclear Reg. Comm.
Power Association MembeN#bEfe $oufh Otbfchs System Hat ie r
S 39401 yg
- ,7, g
~ _ -. - -
~
Attach =ent to AECM-81/45 Page 1 of 1 i
i INTERIM REPORT NO. 2 for PRD-80/a7 e
I.
Description of Deficiency Inadequate control of the Supplier Drawing Revision Notice (SDRN)
Progtsm has caused the status of affected equipment (incorporation j
of SDRN's) to be indeterminate.
II.
Approach to Resolution of Problen 1.
Perform investigative a'. cions to identify nonconforming con-1 ditions; docu=ent, evaluate and disposition each conconfor-Sance.
2.
Review and revise procedural controls established for the SDRN program.
III. Status of the Preposed Resolution An investigation to determine extent has been completed. Rein-spections of SDRN incorporation have been perfor=ed. All dis-covered nonconfor=ances were documented. All nonconformance docu-ments on this subject, along with a list of SDRN's the jobsite i
did not have at the ti=e the problem was detected, have been.
forwarded from the Constructor to the Architect / Engineer for an analysis to determine affect on safety. Remedial actions will be accomplished by resolution to nonconfer=ance documents.
IV.
Reasons for Delay in Final Report An investigation by the Architect / Engineer to determine what effect this deficiency has on safety is still in progress.
V.
Projected Cc=pletion Date Projected submittal date of final report is April 28, 1981.
,