ML19340E158
| ML19340E158 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 11/14/1980 |
| From: | Foulsham P BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | Saltzman J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8101060565 | |
| Download: ML19340E158 (6) | |
Text
-
1 g
en C
-. 4 i e.,,,
BOSTON EDISON COMPANV Ge. 46 Cer.cs s e:: B o n s.o~ S..s e.
Bestc%. M assacMust ?'s 02199 November 14, 1980 Mr. Jerome Saltzman, Chief Anti-Trust Inderinity Group Nuclear Regulatory Commission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency
'4ashington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr. Saltzman:
Re: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ANI Policy NF-188 and MAELU Policy MF-58 Enclosed are eight certified copies of the following:
1.
MAELU's Restoration of Limit of Liability Endorsement No. 42.
2.
ANI's Restoration of Limit of Liability Endorsement No. 53.
The policy's limit of liability had been reduced by the amount of the 7
l payments made and expenses incurred by the insurer with respect to the six occurrences described in paragraph 2 of the Restoration of Limit of i
Liability Endorsement (MAELU's Endorsement No. 42 and ANI's Endorsement No. 33).
MAELU's Endorsement No. 42 reinstates the coverage to the full policy limit of liability (currently S36,000,000). ANI's Endorsement No. 53 reinstates the coverage to the full policy limit of liability (currently
$124,000,000).
Very truly yours, Paul A. Foulsham Manager - Insurance Department cmh Enclosures
\\
\\
8101060 h[
Nuclear Energy Liability insurance NUCLEAR ENERGY LIABILITY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION RESTORATI0fl 0F LIMIT OF LIABILITY Ef;DORSEMEf4T It is agreed that:
1.
Payments made and expenses incurred by the companies under this policy have reduced, in accordance with Condition 3 of the policy, the limit of the companies' liability stated in Item 4 of the Declarations and the limit of the companies' liability stated in Increase of Limit of Liability Endorsements flos. 19, 29, 34, 43, and 52.
2.
Such reduced limits of the companies' liability are restored to the amounts stated in Item 4 of the Declarations and in the Increase of Limit of Liability Endorsements fio. 19, 29, 34, 43, and 52, except with respect to the companies' obligations undar the policy for payments and expenses in connection with bodily
(
injury or property damage arising out of each of the following occurrences, involving Pilgrim fluclear Power Station:
i (a) Exposure to off-site radiation from the Station from on or about December 1,1972 and thereaf ter.
(Suit: Plymouth l
County fluclear Information Committee, Inc., et al vs l
l Boston Edison Company, et al).
(b) Exposure to radiation at the Station during the period I
October 9-21, 1975.
(Suit: ltichael G. Daiute and Eliza-beth Daiute vs Boston Edison Company).
1
L' Nuclear Energy Liability insurance NUCLEAR ENERGY LIABILITY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION (c) Exposure to radiation at the Station on February 11,12, and 13, 1976.
(Suit: Lily A. Gutauskas, Admx. Est. of Alfred D. Gutauskas and Individually vs Boston Edison Company and General Electric Corporation).
(d) Exposure to radiation at the Station on or about flov-ember 23, 1977.
(Suits: James Pires and Susan Pires vs Boston Edison Company; and Ralph Fitts and Dorothy Fitts vs Boston Edison Company and Crouse fluclear Energy Services,Inc.).
(e) Exposure to radiation at the Station on various dates in 1977.
(Suit: Edson Brooks and Anna Brooks vs Boston EdisonCompany).
(f) Exposure to radiation at the Station on fiay 21, 1977.
(Francis F. Spano, Sr., and Janet Spano vs Boston Edison Company).
3.
With respect to the companies' obligations under the policy for payments and expenses in connection with bodily injury or property damage arising otK of each of the six occurrences described in paragraph 2 above, the applicable limit of the companies' liability with respect to claims for bodily injury or property damage which may arise is reduced for each by the amount of the payments made and expenses incurred by the companies with respect to each of the occurrences. The amount of the payments made and expenses incurred by the companies with respect to each occurrence is as follows:
S
3 (a) $35,041.78 in connection with the occurrence described in 2(a) above; (b) $9,279.00 in connection with the occurrence described in 2(b)above; (c) $4,068.50 in connection with the occurrence described in 2(c) above; (d) $7,677.00 in connection with the occurrence described in 2(d)above; (e) $475.07 in connection with the occurrence described in 2(e)
Uh ge above; (2A g7 (f) $291.32 in connection with the occurrence described in 2(f) b$$ f above.
22hi
)
4.
The limit of liability stated in Item 4 of the Declarations as re-2 'j s #?
stored by this endorsement, the limits of liability stated in Increase 3a DE oj jgjj of Limit of Liability Endorsements !!as. 19, 29, 34, 43, and 52 as o c. e ae2 restored by this endorsement, and the reduced limits of liability
- 2:3mo 3 Ji 3 E
-.j applicable to the six occurrences described in paragraph 3 above 5532
~
shall not be cumulative; and each payment made by the companies after i
gjj; j[ the effective date of this endorsement for any loss or expense gh
>W d
covered by the policy shall reduce by the amount of such payment each jg8 s
3,E 3.$
dj of those limits of liability, regardless of which limit of liability a=e dy e
.E jeh <
applies with respect to the bodily injury or property damage out of
]$jj e d %.s which such loss or expense arises.
2" o-Effective Dateif' flF-188 July 1'.1980 To form a part of Policy No Insa Endorsement 12:01 A M. Stancard Time issuedf3 Boston Edison Company Date of issue October 1, 1980 For the su scribing ce panies By w
.n m
Endorsement No M
Countersigned by I
-- "W j
by uss. a n
-M9 3
g
,p w
a-e w-
--e wv+1 en-
g-e w
y-
t
\\
NUCLEAR ENERGY LIABILITY INSURANCE
~
l q
MUTUAL ATOMIC ENERGY LIABILITY UNDERWRITERS I
Restoration of Limit of Liability Endorsement i
i j
It is agreed that:
t 1.
Payments made and expenses incurred by the companies under J
this policy have reduced, in accordance with Condition 3 of the policy, the limit of the companies' liability stated in Item 4 of the Declarations and the limit of l
the companies' liability stated in Increase of Limit of l
Liability Endorsements Nos. 17, 22, 31 and 39.
I
)
2.
Such reduced limits of the companies' liability are restored to the amount stated in Item 4 of the Declara-f tions and in the Increase cf Limit of Liability Endorse-ments Nos. 17, 22, 31 and 39, except with respect to the companies' obligations under the policy for payments and expenses in connection with bodily injury or property damage arising out of each of the following occurrences, involving Pilgrim Nuclear Pcwer Station:
Exposure to off-site radiation from the Station a.
j from on or about December 1, 1972 and thereafter.
(Suit:
Plymouth County Nuclear Information Committee, Inc. et al vs. Boston Edison Company, et al).
i b.
Exposure to radiation at the Station during the J
period October 9-21, 1975.
(Suit:
Michael G.
Daiuto and Elizabeth Daiute vs. Boston Edison l
Company).
t Exposure to radiation at the Station on l
c.
l February 11, 12 and 13, 1976.
(Suit:
Lily A.
l Gutauskac, Admx. Est. of Alfred D. Gutauskas and Individually vs. Boston Edison Company and l
General Electric Corporation).
l d.
Exposure to radiation at the Station on or about November 23, 1977.
(Suits:
James Pires and Susan Pires vs. Boston Edison Company; and Ralph Fitts and Dorothy Fitts vs. Boston Edison Company and Crouse Nuclear Energy Services, Inc.).
t Exposure to radiation at the Station on various e.
dates in 1977.
(Suit:
Edson Brooks and Anna i
Brooks vs. Boston Edison Company).
i f.
Exposure to radiation at the Station on May 21, 1977.
(Francis F. Spano, Sr., and Janet Spano vs. Boston Edison Company).
1
.y,,
<--7,,,.m._,,em,
_,_,.,_.,,,.,,.,_m.,,,,.
,,-y.-,,..u,,,..-.._.,.,,..m.m.,__
,_..,,,.,....,,_..,_.m.,,_,__,_--__
m
.-_m 3.
With respect to the companies' obligations under the policy for payments and expenses in connection with bodily injury or property damage arising out of each of the six occur-l rences described in paragraph 2 above, the applicable limit of the companies' liability with respect to claims for bodily injury or property damage which may arise is reduced for each by the amount of the payments made and expenses incurred by the companies with respect to each I
of the occurrences.
The amount of the payments made and expenses incurred by the companies with respect to each occurrence is as follows:
a.
S10,173.42 in connection with the occurrence described in 2a. above; 3
b.
$2,693.91 in connection with the occurrence described in 2b. above; j
c.
$1,181.18 in connection with the occurrence ggy described in 2c. above; d.
S2,228.81 in connection with thd h
ha #t%4 W described in 2d. above; r
s#:d *I
$137.92 in connection with the occu h E, _.
e.
described in 2e above;
... -v. '
I f.
$84.58 in connection with the occurrence described in 2f above.
l 4.
The limit of liability stated in item 4 of the Declarations as restored by this endorsement, the limits of liability stated in Increase of Limit of Liability Endorsements Nos.
j 17,22,31 and 39 as restored by this endorsement, and the i
reduced limits of liability applicable to the six occurrences described in paragraph 3 above shall not be cumulative; and each payment made by the companies after the effective date of this endorsement for any loss or expense covered by the policy shall reduce by the amount of such payment each of those limits of liability, regardless of which limit of t
i liability applies with respect to the bodily injury or property damage out of which such loss or expense arises.
Effective Date of To form a part this Endorsement July 1, 1980 of Policy No.
MF-58 Issued to Boston Edison Company Date of Issue October 8, 1980 For the Subscribing Companies l
By Endorsement No.
42 Countersigned by
- - -,.