ML19340E134

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Preliminary Version of Reactor Bldg Separating Analysis Rept, Providing Description of Analysis Performed & Including Results for Reactor Bldg Primary Containment Drywell Area & 8-ft Elevation of Second Containment
ML19340E134
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 12/22/1980
From: Novarro J
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19340E135 List:
References
RO-80-47, NUDOCS 8101060485
Download: ML19340E134 (1)


Text

.

7 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY FLCO a

J aargewegyw SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION P.O. BOX 618. NORTH COUNTRY ROAD e WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 December 31, 1980 SNRC-526 Mr. Harold R.

Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.

S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Reactor Building Separation Analysis Ref. SNRC-471, April 16, 1980 and SNRC-493, August 14, 1980 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-322

Dear Mr. Denton:

As discussed in the referenced letters, enclosed herewith are six (6) copies of the Shoreham preliminary REACTOR BUILDING SEPARATION ANALYSIS REPORT da,ad December 22, 1980.

This submittal provides a description of the analysis performed and includes the analysis results for the Reactor Building primary containment drywell area and elevation 8' of the secondary containment.

Analyses results covering the remaining levels within the secondary containment are in the final stages of completion and will be submitted during a fcrthcoming review meeting with your Staff.

Your pre-review of this material should provide for a more meaningful discussion at this meeting.

This analysis demonstrates that sufficient separation exists between redundant systems and components within the Reactor Building.

Thus the capability to safely shut down the station, in the event of a postulated fire which results in the disability of all cables and raceways in an entire designated area, is maintained.

This analysis will be an ongoing effort which will terminate with the completion of the installation of all Class IE cables and associated equipment.

At that t; a, an engineering and construction "as-built" review will be performed to reaffirm the analysis results.

f)\\

t i

Verv trulv vours,

^

' ~

Q ), NOS C'A g

7

'f V < V

(

l J.

Novarro, Project Manager Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Enclosures cc: J.

Higgins g,q g,g, i O R.

T.

Carlson JPM/cc n101060