ML19340B131

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Modifies Tech Spec Change Request 91 Re Irradiation of Surveillance Capsules at Crystal River 3.Capsules Removed from TMI-1 in 1976 Should Be Inserted,Irradiated & Withdrawn Per Schedule Shown in Table 4.2-2
ML19340B131
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 10/17/1980
From: Hukill H
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TLL-511, NUDOCS 8010210474
Download: ML19340B131 (2)


Text

'

f 4

Metropolitan Edison Company g

F Post Of fice Bcx 480 Middletown. Pennsylvania 17057 717 944-4041 Wrner's 0: rect Dial Nurnber October 17, 1980 TLL 511 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn:

R. W. Reid, Chief Operatir.g Reactors Branch No. 4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washingt on, D.C.

20555

Dear Sir:

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1)

Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Modification to Technical Specification Change Request No. 91 Per a telephone conversation between Messrs. D. Dilanni of your staff and D. Mitchell of Met-Ed, the following changes to TSCR #91, concerning the irradiation of surveillance capsules in the Crystal River 3 reactor, the follouing section revisions were suggested.

4.2.2 The reactor vessel material surveillance capsules removed from TMI-l during 1976 shall be inserted, irradiated in and withdrawn from Crystal River Unit No. 3 (CR-3) in accordance with the schedule shown in Table 4.2-2.

(The insertion / withdrawal schedule shown in Table 4.2-2 may be revised at a later date pending the restart of TMI-2.)

Met-Ed shall be responsible for the examination of these specimens and for submission of reports of test results in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix H.

Bases:

b.

Because of damage to the surveillance capsule holder tubes originally installed in TMI-1, irradiation of the TMI-1 capsules was to be conducted in TMI-2 pursuant to 10 CFR 50, Appendix H,Section II.C.4.

A total of six (6) R.V. Surveillance Capsules had original'.y been available for irradiation at TMI-1.

One of the capsules (Capsule E) had been irradiated at TMI-l and subsequently withdrawn and tested. A second capsule (Capsule A) had been installed at TMI-2 due to the un-availability of TMI-l for further capsule irradiation due to vibration problems.

The other four capsules were scheduled for later insertions.

However, due to the TMI-2 incident, Unit 2 may be out of operation for a considerably longer period of time than will be IMI-1.

So that TMI-l will have an ongoing surveillance program, a TMI-l capsule will be inserte

(

4 0 1 0 2 1 g J.f g g

=c -

-- +~

.a-J

I; 1

J R. W. Reid TLL 511 into a holder tube in ':hc Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) reactor.

Becease similarities exist between TMI-l and CR-3, appropriate adjustments and margins can be imposed to the surveillance capsule irradiation in CR-3 to account for such dif ferences that may exist in the irradiation exposure of the TMI-l Reactor Vessel and the surveillance capsule.

The'> chcnges have been reviewed and approved for inclusion in TSCR #91.

Sincerely, 1 a,

ll sj HL D.

lukill Director, IMI-l HDH;'GM:;.ah cc:

J. T. Collins B. J. Snyder B. H. Grier D. Dilanni H. Silver