|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20070E4671991-02-26026 February 1991 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Upgrading Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage of Nuclear Reactors.Recommends That NRC Deny Petition to Increase Design Basis Threat for Security ML20207C1331986-12-18018 December 1986 Order Terminating CPPR-81 & CPPR-82,per Util 860711 Motion to Withdraw Applications for OLs ML20215E7301986-12-17017 December 1986 Memorandum & Order Authorizing Withdrawal of OL Application & Dismissing OL Proceeding,Per Applicant 860711 Motion. Served on 861218 ML20211L6181986-12-11011 December 1986 Response to Board 861203 Questions Re Util Request to Terminate OL Proceeding ML20211L6391986-12-11011 December 1986 Affidavit of Gb Staley Re Preparation of Answers to Board 861203 Questions on Termination of OL Proceeding. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20215B2071986-12-11011 December 1986 Responds to Questions Posed in ASLBP 861203 Memorandum & Order Re Conversion to gas-fired Facility.Imposition of Conditions on Withdrawal of OL Application Unnecessary. Certificate of Svc & Svc List Encl ML20214Q4431986-12-0303 December 1986 Memorandum & Order Granting Motion to Expedite Completion of Withdrawal Proceedings & Posing Questions to Parties.Served on 861204 ML20214G7941986-11-24024 November 1986 Motion to Expedite Completion of Withdrawal of Licensee OL Application & Terminate Pending OL & CP Mod Proceedings. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214T7361986-09-26026 September 1986 Memorandum & Order Dismissing OM Proceeding as Moot & Deferring Action on Applicant Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application Pending NRC Preparation of Environ Assessment.Served on 860929 ML20212M7661986-08-25025 August 1986 Response to Util 860711 Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & for Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings.Board Should Hold Motion in Abeyance Pending NRC Review of Stabilization Plan.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206M8171986-08-15015 August 1986 Response to ASLB 860716 Order Requesting Responses Re Termination of OM Proceeding.Termination of OL Proceeding & Withdrawal of OL Application Requested.Om Proceeding Should Be Considered Moot.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20212B0311986-08-0101 August 1986 Memorandum & Order Withdrawing Retention of Jurisdiction Over Radon Issue Presented in Facility CP Proceeding & Vacating ASLB Partial Initial Decision on Remedial Soils in Consolidated CP Mod & OL Proceeding.Served on 860801 ML20212B0521986-07-31031 July 1986 Order Extending Time Until 860815 for Util & Other Parties to Respond to Questions Posed by 860716 ASLB Order.Time Extended Until 860825 for NRC Response to ASLB Questions & Util Motion.Served on 860801 ML20203F8791986-07-28028 July 1986 Response Supporting Util 860711 Motion for Termination of Appeal Board Jurisdiction Over Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20207H6871986-07-22022 July 1986 Motion for Extension Until 860815 to File Responses to Four Questions Re Util Motion to Dismiss OL & OM Proceedings. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20207E2851986-07-16016 July 1986 Order Presenting Questions in Response to Util 860711 Motion to Dismiss OL Proceeding & to Terminate Order of Mod Proceeding.Served on 860717 ML20202G0121986-07-11011 July 1986 Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings ML20202G1201986-07-11011 July 1986 Motion for Termination of Aslab Jurisdiction to Facilitate Termination of Cps,Withdrawal of OL Application & Dismissal of Consolidated OM-OL Proceeding ML20202G1621986-07-11011 July 1986 Notice of Change of Address for Washington Ofc of Isham, Lincoln & Beale,Attys for Util.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20202G0491986-07-10010 July 1986 Affidavit of JW Cook Re Conversion of Plant Into combined- cycle,gas-fired Power Plant.Plant Never Operable as Nuclear facility.Nuclear-related Equipment Will Be Sold ML20202G0281986-07-0808 July 1986 Affidavit of Ta Mcnish Re True & Correct Extracts of 860408 & 0618 Minutes of Meetings.Resolutions Recited Therein in Full Force & Effect ML20198J4651986-05-27027 May 1986 Notice of ASLB Reconstitution.C Bechhoefer,Chairman & J Harbour & Ga Linenberger,Members.Served on 860529 ML20198J3861986-05-27027 May 1986 Notice of ASLB Reconstitution.C Bechoefer,Chairman & J Harbour & Ga Linenberger,Members.Served on 860529 ML20137E0041985-11-21021 November 1985 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding ML20137D9651985-11-21021 November 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133F6421985-10-0909 October 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20134N3771985-08-30030 August 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl DD-84-17, Order Affirming 840724 Director'S Decision DD-84-17 Denying Bp Garde 10CFR2.206 Petition for Action Against Util Re Plant Const.Const Abandoned on 840910.No Further Enforcement Action Required.Served on 8506241985-06-24024 June 1985 Order Affirming 840724 Director'S Decision DD-84-17 Denying Bp Garde 10CFR2.206 Petition for Action Against Util Re Plant Const.Const Abandoned on 840910.No Further Enforcement Action Required.Served on 850624 ML20127N7591985-06-20020 June 1985 Transcript of Commission 850620 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote in Washington,Dc Concerning Denial of 2.206 Petition for Midland plant,SECY-85-60 Concerning Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule & Shoreham Order.Pp 1-4 ML20133D9481985-05-13013 May 1985 Response to Aslab 850423 Order.Aslab Should Cancel OL Application & CPs Because Compliance W/Nrc Basic Requirements Not Met ML20116G5181985-04-29029 April 1985 Response to Memorandum of City & County of Midland,Mi Re ASLB 850405 & 0313 Orders on CP Mod Proceedings.Bechtel Should Not Be Granted Admission to Proceedings ML20115J4351985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion for Leave to Participate as Amicus Curiae,Per Aslab 850313 & 0405 Memoranda & Orders Requesting Response to Questions Re Proceeding ML20115J4751985-04-19019 April 1985 Memorandum in Response to Aslab 850405 Order Re Dismissal of OL Application.Application Neither Abandoned Nor Delayed in Dilutory Manner.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20115J5421985-04-19019 April 1985 City & County of Midland,State of Mi Motion for Leave to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Aslab Request for Responses to Questions Presented in 850313 & 0405 Memoranda Orders. Proof of Svc Encl ML20116G5321985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Resolution of Issue to Involuntary Dismissal of License Application,Per Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order.Granted for Aslab on 850422. Served on 850429 ML20115J5551985-04-19019 April 1985 City & County of Midland,State of Mi Response to Aslab 850313 Order to File Memoranda Re Whether Aslab Should Vacate ASLB Decision Re Certain Mods to CP Due to Mootness. Proof of Svc Encl ML20115J5501985-04-19019 April 1985 Response Opposing Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order Re Dismissal of OL Applications.Urges Board to Permit OL Applications to Continue in Suspension Until Applicant Affirmatively Resolves Disposition ML20115J5461985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion to Participate Amici Curiae in Resolution of Issue of Involuntary Dismissal of License Application as Identified in Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order ML20112J5281985-04-0101 April 1985 Memorandum in Response to Aslab 850313 Order LBP-85-2. Decision Should Not Be Vacated.Ol Should Be Dismissed.Based on Listed Changes,New OL Review Required ML20112J6301985-04-0101 April 1985 Memorandum Requesting Aslab Not Take Any Action to Vacate LBP-85-2 or Dismiss OL Applications,Per 850313 Order,Based on Current Intent to Hold CPs & Attempt to Sell Plant. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20112H0981985-03-27027 March 1985 Response to Aslab 840313 Order Re Whether ASLB Decision to Review Issues in Soils Hearing Appropriate Use of Public Resources.Concurs W/Decision to Remand OL W/Instructions to Dismiss OL Application for Failure to Pursue Soils Issue ML20106F6531985-02-0808 February 1985 Response Opposing Intervenor B Stamiris 841224 Motion for Evidentiary Hearings Re Litigation Between Applicant & Dow Chemical Co.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20106D6631985-02-0808 February 1985 Response Opposing B Stamiris 841224 Pleading Requesting Evidentiary Hearing on Matter Raised in applicant-Dow Chemical Trial & Referral of Certain Matters to Ofc of Investigations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101S9421985-02-0101 February 1985 Motion for Extension Until 850306 to File Notice of Appeal of ASLB 850123 Partial Initial Decision.Granted by Aslab on 850201 ML20101S9111985-02-0101 February 1985 Motion for Extension of Time within Which to File Notice of Appeal of ASLB 850123 Partial Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101F3191984-12-24024 December 1984 Request for Evidentiary Hearings on Matter Raised in CPC-Dow Trial & Referral of Certain Matters to Ofc of Investigations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20107K8011984-11-0101 November 1984 Affidavit of Jd Selby Re Plans Concerning Facilities.Const Will Be Resumed Only If Proposed by Appropriate Governmental Agencies & Officials & If Funds from Some Other Source Become Available.Related Correspondence ML20106F5241984-10-24024 October 1984 Motion to Request ASLB to Cancel Const License & Application for OL ML20092J0361984-06-22022 June 1984 Reply to NRC Further Supplemental Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re QA ML20092J0241984-06-22022 June 1984 Reply to B Stamiris Second Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law on QA & Mgt Attitude Issues. Certificate of Svc Encl 1991-02-26
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20215B2071986-12-11011 December 1986 Responds to Questions Posed in ASLBP 861203 Memorandum & Order Re Conversion to gas-fired Facility.Imposition of Conditions on Withdrawal of OL Application Unnecessary. Certificate of Svc & Svc List Encl ML20214G7941986-11-24024 November 1986 Motion to Expedite Completion of Withdrawal of Licensee OL Application & Terminate Pending OL & CP Mod Proceedings. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20212M7661986-08-25025 August 1986 Response to Util 860711 Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & for Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings.Board Should Hold Motion in Abeyance Pending NRC Review of Stabilization Plan.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206M8171986-08-15015 August 1986 Response to ASLB 860716 Order Requesting Responses Re Termination of OM Proceeding.Termination of OL Proceeding & Withdrawal of OL Application Requested.Om Proceeding Should Be Considered Moot.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20203F8791986-07-28028 July 1986 Response Supporting Util 860711 Motion for Termination of Appeal Board Jurisdiction Over Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20207H6871986-07-22022 July 1986 Motion for Extension Until 860815 to File Responses to Four Questions Re Util Motion to Dismiss OL & OM Proceedings. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20202G0121986-07-11011 July 1986 Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings ML20202G1201986-07-11011 July 1986 Motion for Termination of Aslab Jurisdiction to Facilitate Termination of Cps,Withdrawal of OL Application & Dismissal of Consolidated OM-OL Proceeding ML20133D9481985-05-13013 May 1985 Response to Aslab 850423 Order.Aslab Should Cancel OL Application & CPs Because Compliance W/Nrc Basic Requirements Not Met ML20116G5181985-04-29029 April 1985 Response to Memorandum of City & County of Midland,Mi Re ASLB 850405 & 0313 Orders on CP Mod Proceedings.Bechtel Should Not Be Granted Admission to Proceedings ML20115J4351985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion for Leave to Participate as Amicus Curiae,Per Aslab 850313 & 0405 Memoranda & Orders Requesting Response to Questions Re Proceeding ML20115J5421985-04-19019 April 1985 City & County of Midland,State of Mi Motion for Leave to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Aslab Request for Responses to Questions Presented in 850313 & 0405 Memoranda Orders. Proof of Svc Encl ML20115J5461985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion to Participate Amici Curiae in Resolution of Issue of Involuntary Dismissal of License Application as Identified in Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order ML20115J5501985-04-19019 April 1985 Response Opposing Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order Re Dismissal of OL Applications.Urges Board to Permit OL Applications to Continue in Suspension Until Applicant Affirmatively Resolves Disposition ML20115J5551985-04-19019 April 1985 City & County of Midland,State of Mi Response to Aslab 850313 Order to File Memoranda Re Whether Aslab Should Vacate ASLB Decision Re Certain Mods to CP Due to Mootness. Proof of Svc Encl ML20116G5321985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Resolution of Issue to Involuntary Dismissal of License Application,Per Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order.Granted for Aslab on 850422. Served on 850429 ML20112J5281985-04-0101 April 1985 Memorandum in Response to Aslab 850313 Order LBP-85-2. Decision Should Not Be Vacated.Ol Should Be Dismissed.Based on Listed Changes,New OL Review Required ML20112J6301985-04-0101 April 1985 Memorandum Requesting Aslab Not Take Any Action to Vacate LBP-85-2 or Dismiss OL Applications,Per 850313 Order,Based on Current Intent to Hold CPs & Attempt to Sell Plant. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20112H0981985-03-27027 March 1985 Response to Aslab 840313 Order Re Whether ASLB Decision to Review Issues in Soils Hearing Appropriate Use of Public Resources.Concurs W/Decision to Remand OL W/Instructions to Dismiss OL Application for Failure to Pursue Soils Issue ML20106D6631985-02-0808 February 1985 Response Opposing B Stamiris 841224 Pleading Requesting Evidentiary Hearing on Matter Raised in applicant-Dow Chemical Trial & Referral of Certain Matters to Ofc of Investigations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20106F6531985-02-0808 February 1985 Response Opposing Intervenor B Stamiris 841224 Motion for Evidentiary Hearings Re Litigation Between Applicant & Dow Chemical Co.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101S9111985-02-0101 February 1985 Motion for Extension of Time within Which to File Notice of Appeal of ASLB 850123 Partial Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101S9421985-02-0101 February 1985 Motion for Extension Until 850306 to File Notice of Appeal of ASLB 850123 Partial Initial Decision.Granted by Aslab on 850201 ML20101F3191984-12-24024 December 1984 Request for Evidentiary Hearings on Matter Raised in CPC-Dow Trial & Referral of Certain Matters to Ofc of Investigations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20106F5241984-10-24024 October 1984 Motion to Request ASLB to Cancel Const License & Application for OL ML20084J6111984-05-0404 May 1984 Responds Opposing Sinclair 840419 Motion to Request Caseload Forecast Panel Evaluate New Const Completion Schedule.Aslb Should Deny Request for Relief Contained in Motion. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20084H2581984-05-0202 May 1984 Memorandum in Opposition to Govt Accountability Project (Gap) 840417 Petition for Review.Gap Policy on Disclosures to Press Rules Out Genuine Claim That Affidavits Were to Be Maintained in Total Confidence.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083N6481984-04-17017 April 1984 Petition for Review of Aslab 840330 Decision & Order ALAB-764 Re Subpoenas Directed to Govt Accountability Project.Aslab Erroneous Re Important Questions of Law & Policy.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20087M9821984-03-30030 March 1984 Response to B Stamiris 840304 New Contention Re Transamerica Delaval,Inc Diesel Generators.Bases in Support of Contention Clarified.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079M6481984-01-23023 January 1984 Request for Leave to File Encl Corrected Copies of Applicant 831209 Memorandum in Opposition to Appeal of Govt Accountability Project.Table of Contents & Table of Authorities Inadvertently Omitted.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082U0311983-12-0909 December 1983 Memorandum Opposing Govt Accountability Project (Gap) 831021 Appeal of ASLB Order Granting Util Motion to Depose Gap Witnesses.First Amend Argument Inapplicable Since Affiant Identity Will Not Be Disclosed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082E1341983-11-22022 November 1983 Request for Extension Until 831209 to File Brief Opposing Appeal of Govt Accountability Project Deponents.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20086A8801983-11-0404 November 1983 Response to Util Motion to Compel & Application for Enforcement of Subpoenas.Submission to Discovery Would Cause Immediate Grave & Irreparable Injury to Organizational Viability.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20081F8991983-11-0202 November 1983 Motion to Compel & Application for Enforcement of Subpoenas Against Govt Accountability Project Deponents,L Clark, T Devine,Bp Garde & L Hallberg.Response from Deponents Must Be Filed Before 831110.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081E8931983-10-31031 October 1983 Reply to Applicant 831014 Response to Second Supplemental Memorandum in Support of B Stamiris 831005 Motion to Litigate Two Dow Issues.Issues Timely Raised & Present New Evidence.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20090H4271983-10-26026 October 1983 Motion to Continue Beginning Date of Hearings Scheduled for 831031 to 3 Days After Date.Extended Hearing Necessary to Allow Time to Receive Responses to 831011 Discovery Requests.W/Certificate of Svc ML20090H3401983-10-25025 October 1983 Motion for Admission Into Evidence of Transcript of Jl Donnell 831015 Deposition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081E9481983-10-25025 October 1983 Memorandum in Support of 831021 Appeal of ASLB Orders Granting Issuance of Subpoenas.Subpoenas Violate First Amend Rights.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081B1751983-10-25025 October 1983 Motion to Compel CPC Responses to 831011 Interrogatories & Request for Production Re Investigation of Alleged Violation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081B0681983-10-21021 October 1983 Memorandum in Support of Appeal from ASLB Orders Granting Discovery Against Govt Accountability Project.Subpoenas Violate Common Law of Privilege.Util Showed No Compelling Need for Discovery ML20078K3141983-10-14014 October 1983 Response to B Stamiris 831005 Second Supplemental Memorandum Supporting Dow Issues.Stamiris Fails to Show New & Significant Info Justifying Reopening Record.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078F5561983-10-0505 October 1983 Second Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Intervenor Stamiris Motion to Litigate Dow Chemical Co Issues Against Applicant.Dow Documents & Complaints Support Litigation of Issues Raised in Original Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080P9131983-10-0303 October 1983 Motion to Stay Depositions of L Clark,T Devine,Bp Garde & L Hallberg as Directed in ASLB 830831 Order.Depositions Should Be Stayed Pending Review of 830930 Motion for Reconsideration.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080P1161983-10-0303 October 1983 Errata to 830930 Motion for Reconsideration.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078A3471983-09-21021 September 1983 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of 830808 Motion to Litigate Dow Issues.Documents Reveal That Util Knew Fuel Load Dates Presented to NRC Jul 1980 - Apr 1983 False. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20077S7161983-09-19019 September 1983 Motion by L Clark,T Devine,Bp Garde & L Hallberg for Extension Until 830930 to File Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 830831 Order Denying Motion to Quash Subpoenas. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20024E8261983-09-0202 September 1983 Response Opposing M Sinclair Motion to Reconsider Privilege Ruling.Presence of Bechtel Officials at 821124 Meeting Does Not Destroy Privilege.Bechtel & CPC Share Common Legal Interest.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20024E8771983-09-0202 September 1983 Motion to Reconsider Schedule for Submitting Proposed Findings of Fact on Remedial Soils Issues.Intervenors Should Be Required to File Proposed Findings on Remedial Soils Issues by 831115.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076F3261983-08-23023 August 1983 Motion for Extension Until 830902 to Respond to Intervenor Motion to Reconsider Order Upholding atty-client Privilege Protection for 821124 Util/Bechtel Meeting.Motion Received 5 Days After Mailing.W/Certificate of Svc ML20076C6711983-08-17017 August 1983 Response to M Sinclair & B Stamiris 830728 Motions Re Dow Vs Util Lawsuit.Aslb Should Defer Motions for 30 Days.Motions Could Be Refiled After Documents Reviewed.Two Oversize Drawings Encl.Aperture Cards in Pdr.Certificate of Svc Encl 1986-08-25
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ -
.. _. w ny V _. . . _ _ . __
d.. t .* N I s9
~
., { 9
[.. 2 - .*.To -
- > D, / yk 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA "
2 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g //
e . e . e , ,
APPEAL to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board,
= in compliance with 10, C.F.R. 2 714 a, from Order of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board:
That the question of jurisdiction over both the subject and subject matter is appealed from in general, and some parts in particular.
Docket Numbers: 50-329 OM 50-330 OM .
50-329 OL 50-329 OL In the Matter of CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY, Midland Plants, Units # 1 and # 2
, p.-
On Order resulting from September 10, 1980 pre-hearing, dealing with proceeding involving Order modifying construction permits, No. CPR-81 and No. CPR-82, dated December 6, 1979, e a e o e Your Petitioner takes exception to the foregoing
. .: Order, and states that the Order stands moot as to the question .of jurisdiction.
~
Since January 31, 1979, % Edlht'iod.'~i.the o diea'n Water Act over discharges of solid wastes in wetlands is contained in 40% of the Clean Water Act:
The Administrator of the Environmental Protection
' Agency, not the Secretary of the Army, has the authority to determine whether disposition of solid wastes requires i a N.P.D.E.S. permit or a Section 404 permit: fill material as discharge. ..
,w. = gM dW--
son 180 \% 98[3,
In a case of disagreement, the Administrator and the Secretary of the Administratar have the ultimate ,;
authority to determine whether a discharge of solid waste in waters of the United States requires an N.P.D.E.S.
permit or a Section 404 permit. Such a permit must be
{[
secured 404 (B) (1) which are prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency. ' '
=
APPEAL from denial of letter presented to the Atomic Hearing Board, denied on the grounds of being both " untimely" and " vague" -
Petitioner represents, upon appeal, that a question of jurisdiction was raised before the Board, and is reflected in the official record; that, further, a conflict of administrative laws is evident as to juris-diction over " fill materials", where the construction of the sinking generator building is in a flood district and upon,the surface of land situated over underground water courses constantly flowing.
- 1. The Tittabawassee River is a navigable stream, within the meaning of the law.
- 73 . , . Ruled by Douglas: a nagivable stream does not have to be navigable at all times to be considered and held a navigable stream.
Moreover, that the silt and erosion of-fill material into the Tittabawassee River has not been denied. *
- 2. That fill dirt does pose a threat by running into the natural water courses, and there-after into the Tittabawassee River.
u
,=
C m
3 That consolidation under Part 2, Rules of Practice, subport. D - 2.402 was approved by the Board on the hearing at Midland, E Michigan.
44-.
NOW COMES WENDELL H. MARSHALL, denied the admissions .
of a' letter on the basis of being "both untimely and vague", and takes exception to these finds, and takes appeal therefrom:
Claiming there is a conflict of laws as to
/ jurisdictio'n, since the Consumers Power Company refuses to make the borings requested by the N.R.C., stating that the cost would entail expenditures of one milli,or. dollars
-- since over this, amount is spent every day on this construction, it would lead one to conclude that Consumers i Power Company engineers know that the construction is over underwater caverns.
.. With regard to jurisdiction, it is the position of the appellant that modification should include inclusion of consideration of the Number One law enforcement officer of the United States of America, Attorney General Civiletti:
To Clifford Alexander, September 5, 1979:
" Noting the adminis'trator's role under Section 10D, the dual role of the E.P.A. and the Corps under Section 404, and that a jurisdictional decision by the Corps O~ould necessarily affect parts of the program administered by -
E.P.A., not the Corps, had authority to determine the jurisdictional waters of the ' United States' which appears in the general provisions of the Act. Section 502(7) and F
l c-l
=
r
!?
F'" the term ' fill' appears only ir$ Section 404 and related parts of Section 208. In each case, the interpretation ,;
- 2 of the term clearly impacts other programs unde,r the Act; in fact, in the instant situation and interpretation by Q the Corps could considerably even affect the applicability of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, which is s also an 'E.P. A. statute' . R.C.R.A. excludes from ' solid waste' those indus't rial discharges which are point sources subject to permits under Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act."
e o e e e,
. The Atomir. Safety and Licensing Board, Charles Bechoefer,
' Chairman, on October 27th, 1980 - prehearing conference order ruling on contentions and on consolidation of proceedings, October 24, 1980, in re the order modifying Construction Permits No. CPR-81 and No. CPR-82, dated December 6,.1979 OM proceedings, and Operating Licence OL .
proceedings, involving issues related to those under consideration in the OM proceeding.
This appeal is taken fro.a failure to admit the letter of Wendell H. Marshall, representative of the Mapleton Intervenors, which was to be considered in the form of a petition in the OL proceedings, that the only proposed contention for the OM proceedings was the first paragraph of his letter of August 27, 1980.
At the same time, before the Board, Mr. Marshall, Petitioner, did raise questions as to jurisdiction, an.d stated that a signed contract in the form of a compact was in existence by and between the People of the United' States of America and the People of Canada, signed and executed by President Nixon and President Trudeau of -
Canada. '-
4
e .-
r p
= _
ls u
Requested on the basis of timeless' factors of 10 C.F.R. 2.714 (a).
[2..
. On May 27, 1980, the Consumers Power Ccmpany g; filed a motion to consolidate the ON proceedings with three issues relating to soil conditions and E plant fill materials raised in the OL proceedings by memorandum and order dated June 27, 1980.
Appeal taken 2 714 raising questions raised upon hearing in RE 2 718 taken appeal from the Order of the f.7.? Atomic Safety and Licenr..ag Board, dated at Bethesda, m
Maryland, this 24th day of October, 1980.
Signed by Charles Bechthoefer, Chairman, speaking E for the Panel.
e e e o e
. The most recent regulatory ruling to my letter I
was that it was " vague and untimely". Exception is ,
taken.
Regulations of August 7, 1975, revealed many questions as to the scope of the Act; one of the most frequently raised questions was whether employees are considered part of the "public water system" (see Section 1401(4)).
E.P.A.'s response, as formulated in Appendix A to the. November 12, 1975 draft of the final regulations, was that such water supplies are covered even where they do not serve the general puablic (see Appendix A, Statutes, at page 3 ,
,2. - Pre-hearing conference order ruling on contentions y+. and on consolidation of proceedings October 24, 1980; -
on September 10, 1980, page 9 B 2:
g .
- q e
"- ) ,
i "The applicant would reject the last sentence of Ms. Warren's contention 2 A on the basis that it relates '
to natural soils (silt) rather than fill soils, and I claim that the modification order relates only to i;.3-
- fill soils."
Petitioner takes exception to failure to admit
{l:"
~~~
Augus.t 27, 1980 letter, re-stating that a compact by and between Canada and tha United States of America, as signed by Richard M. Nixon and President Pierre Trudeau of Canada amounts to a wr,it of prohibition under the circumstances, barring construction or licensing of a nuclear power plant unless an absolute guarantee can be given that the ,
common waters of the two nations are not endangered.
Petitioner raised the questions of jurisdiction in the record as to the soils settlement and compacted fill materials.
p . s. -
g e o e e e Environmental Protection Agency 1
March 20, 1979 Clean Air Act', Section 122 (c) (2)
The N.R.C. requirement under the Atomic Energy Act This mandate for cooperation is subject to the limitation that it be consistent with the provisions of the Clean Air Act, Section 122 (c) (2).
Moreover, in Congress' view, providing only a Section 404 exemption for those discharges was not enough, since E.P.A. would still be able to step in and require
,a Section 402 permit.
O.
e a
4 w w
.~ .
= .
?=
With respect to the claim that your Petitioner-
!E Appellant is " untimely" in his presentation, I stand I
=
chagrined.
I was born in Midland County, Michigan, of poor
- (.; - p .. -
- E but honest parents, and walked over a mile to school for five years without ever being absent or tardy. I
,j. .
t still possess a' medal awarded by the School District for this outstanding record; and I claim that this record
.... of school attendance has established a standard of m
punctuality and timeliness which I have sustained throughout my life.
As far as " vagueness" is concerned, I cannot pretend
=
to the standards of attorneys and others skilled in word usage, inasmuch as I have never taken any of the following courses (as recommended by law schools) from any accredited college of law:
Business law t
Civil procedure Constitutional law Contracts Criminal law Equity Evidence Legal writing and research
. :: Professional responsibility Property Taxation Torts Trial advocacy
= Be'that as it may, I feel that I am able to express myself in layman'$ language, and I beg the Appeal Board's
= indulgence for my lack of formal legal education; I am as precise in my presentations as I can possibly be, within my limitations.
Cn:
1
s.:
5 I wish the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the g Docketing Service to permit me to take advantage, under ;
_., the law, of copies to be furnished to the participants under the new section, absolutely free gratis and for nothing, which, I understand, will include franked mail service to the certified list and all interested agencies, llE and, in particular, Mr. William D. Paton, Counsel for the N.R.C. staff, and James E. Brunner of the Consumers Power Company, 212 West Michigan Avenue, Jackson, Michigan.
Dated this '12th day of November, A.D. 1980, at Midland, Michigan.
i d tE H <
Wendell H. Marshall, President Mapleton Interrenors Petitioner - Appellant u
e a
9
!?
e
. .:. - -._=. - - . .. . .
o .
t s
TO: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 ,
i ATTN: Robert L. Tedesco
~
-Assistant Director for Licensing
= Division of Licensing FROM: Mapleton Intervenors Wendell H. Marshall, President 5
=
RE: Docket Nos.. 50-329/330 OL 50-329/330 OM
SUBJECT:
Request for Details of Stress Analysis for Underground Piping EXHIBIT # 1 m The continued settling of the buildings, and the most recent report by the N.R.C. - Mechanical Engineering Branch, in conjunction with their Energy Technology Engineering Center, on the serious overstress of underground piping before service, as reported by Mr. Robert L. Tedesco in his letters of October 20, 1980, to the Consumers Power .
Company, indicate that this problem has not been solved.
This is further evidence that not all of th,e engineering considerations applicable to the building of a nuclear plant in a natural flood plain at the junction of three rivers with attendant dewatering engineering problems have been considered - one might say, they have been grossly overlooked - with respect to plant site selection and the attendant hydraulic conditions.
Th'e dewatering soil compaction problem at the Midland nuclear plant site is one where all the facts and parameters have not been considered in the assessment of the true problem. In this area, problem solving on a piecemeal, -
basis is not conducive to a safely engineered plant.
e m
e l
i t
=w -
, y - - -
x: . a.
.- .. . . - - . -- - - - . - . - - .z.----.---
.= .b m
=
The location of the nuclear plant at the junction of'
- = three rivers indicates that the plant is settling upon a '
hardpan in a flood plain. The hardpan is the natural
~~
. drainage route of surface water, supplemented by an 55 artesian flow, depending upon the water tables both above and below the various water tables of each individual y hardpan layer.
During heavy rainfall, the natural drainage flow from the high ground must flow along natural drainage ditches.
In addition, the ground water build-up due to the wet M season can, and does, affect the water tables. It is a known fact that, in the Midland area, there are many artesian water flows from naturally occuring flows and R
. from abandoned wells that have not been plugged.
I would also assume that the many core samples taken over the plant site area were not plugged, and would offer a natural additional relief of the accumulated ground water
, pressure, permitting water to penetrate the plant cons'truction site, in addition to the normal surface water runoff.
While not germane, I do believe that much technical information and findings have not been recorded, and would have been overlooked by the succeeding engineers not familiar
.= with the original surveys. The lack of continuity of engineering precludes the acceptance of a total individual responsibility, in the face of known personal problems in -
the engineering staff at the Midland site. This implication g involves the Dow Chemical Company, the Consumers Power Company, and Bechtel Construction Company personnel.
In summary, there are just too many factors that have -
~
not been reported in the areas of natural watercourse drainage, penetration of hardpan in areas susceptible to varying hydraulic groundwater pressures, natura).ly oc' curring artesian wells as.related to seasonal rainfall, and ten ,
fifty , and hundred-year floods.
l 4
l
._..l
.s . ..'
.=
t:-
- =
It is further noted that many engineering water problems were encountered by the Dow Chemical Company ,; l
= I
"~ and their contractors in construction adjacent to the l l
nuc.~ ear site, south of the river. The question resolves:
Ep: Has all of the history of this area been evaluated in*
terms of the whole, or has a system of piecemeal 5f engineering been used to solve immediate problems?
.l5
==
= -
thbb d Wendell H. Marshall, President Mapleton Intervenors Route # 10 Midland, Michigan 48640 p...
I a
e *
- =.
"j '._. e
~ . -.
{ ..
g7 h
e- ,
cc: Michael I. Miller, Esq.
Ronald G. Zamarin, Esq.
- Mr. Don van Farowe, Chief- '
Alan S. Farnell, Esq. Division of Radiological Health
~ Isham, Lincoln & Beale Department of Public Health Suite 4200 P.O. Box 33035 1 First National Plaza Lansing, Michigan 48909 Chicago, Illinois 60603 James E. Brunner, Esq. !
Consumers Power Company William J. Scanlon, Esq. -
21? West Xichigan Avenue 2034 Pauline Boulevard -
Jackson, Michigan 49201 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103-Vyron M. Cherry, Esq. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission ;
' !SM Plaza Resident Inspectors Office Chicago, Illinois 60611 Route 7 Midland, Michigan 48640 :
i Ms. Mary Sinclair ;
5711 Summerset Drive Ms. Barbara Stamiris '
- g - Midland, Michigan 48640 5795 N. River r
Freeland, Michigan 48623 ~
Frank J. Kelley, Esq.
Attorney General Ms. Sharon K. Warren -
636 Hillcrest State of Michigan Environmental -
Protection Division Midland, Michigan 48640 720 Law Building '
Lansi19, Michigan 48913 ,
Mr. Wendell Marshall g . J oute 10 $ l1 91 f Mic!and, Michigan 48640 , p
,. g Mr. Steve Cadler $
i ! 5
??20 Carter Avenue 5t. Paul, Minnesota 55108 Z -' ...,, d 4 @, > "
- I ,
{'
Offssefse34
- MM & Se, ICS 3
% EbCF ff .l
(
t D ~
l
~
~~4.'.
~ 2-bs .
=
cc: Conmander, Naval Surface Weapons Center
P G-402 White Oak .
, g3 Silver Spring, Paryland 20910 s
Mr. L. J. Auge, M4 nager
. . . _ Faci!ity Design Engineering EE
=~
Energy Technology Engineering Center P. O. Box 1449 '
Canoga Park, California 91304 ~
Mr. William Lawhead ,
U. S. Corps of Engineers MCEED - T 7th Floor 477 t'ichigan Avenue .
Detroit, Michigan 48226 Charles Dechhoefer, Esq. ,
Atontic Safety A Licensing Beard
.. S. Nuclear Pegulatory Comm.ission Washington, C. C. 20555 Mr. Gustave A. Linenberger
_..'~
Atem1c Safety A Licensing Ecard U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conctission
,., Vashington, D. C. 20555
==
EE Or. Frederick P. Cowan '7 Ant. B-125 6125 N. Verde Trail ./
r Poca Raton, Florica 33433 f
. . - ~N
, I i
I
.=..,=-.
l s
Wd C < .. O I l
e, 1
D
, -- , .=
-.- -- ---- - -- - - i e
.. l
. I ac g Serial 10051 E i (b D
== ,,
= CC: C3echhcefer, ASLS Panel-GALineuberger, ASL3 Panel
.PPCovan, ASLB Panel TE AS&L Appeal Panel
.WCherry, Esq MSinclair Et CRStephens, USNRC -
~si WPaton, Esq, USNRC FJKelly, Esq, Attorney General SHFreeman, Esq. Asst Attorney Gen
~
O GTTaylor, Esq. Asst Attorney Gen W. Marshall ~
GJMerritt, TNK&J 8
, =
- O' 9
- f. .
h G
e
=
j pz.
i
'p, eo i.
r--'
4 * . e
-- , m - .- w -
l f=
e e, :
s e
%w *
r9 -. .D ,,,.
- ~'
- ' f 4 g C omers -11
%4 g +
fu '
4 I have seen most of the world and have been in its high-est mountains. I have walked the valleys of all the conti-nents and seen their wonders. Now and then I have come
=. across a sanctuary equal to our best But when a full ac-counting is made there is no continent on earth equal in ,
natural wonders and glories to what we have here.
We must learn to love it and cherish it. We must put our arms around it and protect it as we would a fragile but precious child. Technology can destroy it. But it can also save it. Only we the people, not t:chnology, have
" values." Love, respect, admiration, tenderness-these must be our attitude toward this biosphere ifit is not to meet the technological Armaggedon.
-Justice William O. Douglas The New York Times
- July 1,1973, i 4, p.13 g@
e
- -