ML19339C231
| ML19339C231 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/03/1980 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Rogers J KERITE CO. (SUBS. OF HARVEY HUBBELL, INC.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339C224 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900228 NUDOCS 8011170872 | |
| Download: ML19339C231 (2) | |
Text
p88890,,'g J
UNITED S1MES
!,y 3 m j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- ' ^^ ( f r
REGION IV
,[f
?.
611 RYAN PLAZA oRIVE, SulTE 1000 art.INGTON, TEX AS 76012
(]
~ 99900228/80-01 O 3 SEP 1980 Docket No.
The Kerite Company A Subsidiary of Harvey Hubbell, Incorporated Atta: Mr. J. E. Rogers Vice President and General Manager 49 Day Street Seymcur, Connecticut 06483 Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. W. E. Foster, of this office on August 19-21, 1980, of your facility at Seymour, Connecticut, associ-ated with the manufacture of insulatad wire and cable and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. J. B. Gardner and another member of your staff at the con-clusion of the inspection.-
This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented.
The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality.
As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.
You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective cor-rective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements.
The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirementa are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will 1
be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.
8 011170TM
The Kerite Company 2
In accordance with Section 2. 790 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure.
Any such application must includs a full statement of the reasor.s on the basis of which it is claimed that the informa-tion is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is can':ained in a separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
/
/
,Mb
\\ cAa.fvv Uldis Potapovs, Chief I
Vendor Inspection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Deviation 2.
Inspection Report No. 99900228/80-01
.