ML19339A853
| ML19339A853 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07100102 |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1980 |
| From: | Macdonald C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Dicharry R SOURCE PRODUCTION & EQUIPMENT CO., INC. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011050546 | |
| Download: ML19339A853 (2) | |
Text
4
- toa, pter u i
UNITED STATES
~$j
[
8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 o
's$ '
DCT 21 1999 FCTC: RHO 71-0102 Source Production & Equipment Co., Inc.
ATTN: Mr. R. F. Dicharry 625 0xley Street Kenner, LA 70062 Gentlemen:
This refers to the application of September 29, 1980 requesting approval of the SPEC Quality Assurance (QA) program as meeting the QA program requirements of 10 CFR 571.51.
In connect'on with our review, we need the information identified in the enclosure to this lete'r. Please submit seven copies of your response to the enclosed request for additiona 4 infonnation within 30 days following receipt of this letter.
In line with your request, we are sending a copy of this letter and its enclosure directly to Dr. Parker.
If you or Dr. Parker have any questions regarding this request, please contact Mr. Jack Spraul at (301) 492-7741.
Sincerely, G2.J/
A Charles E.
na d, Chief Transportation Certification Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety, NMSS
Enclosure:
Request for Additional In4'ormation cc w/ enclosure:
Roy A. Parker, Ph. D.
{J/g h
3011050 3
p f-
- l I
' SOURCE PRODUCTION & EQUIPMENT CO., INC. (71-0102) l Request for Additional Information I.5 Describe the qualifications of the RSO for administering the quality assurance program.
11.3 Describe how SPEC employees are made aware that the QA program and procedures are manda tory.
IV.6 The right to inspect records at a vendor's facility should be expanded to include the right to inspect hardware and audit.
X.2 When inspection functions are " delegated to appropriate employees," it isn't clear that the inspector is not the person who did the work to be inspected. Clari fy.
XIV.2 Discuss the control of inspection stamps, welding stamps, and status indicators such hs nonconformance (or rejection) tags.
XV.1 Describe a "protool" (see item 15.1 of the September 29, 1980 submittal).
XV.2 It appears that " requested" in item 15.2 of the September 29, 1980 submittal should-be " rejected."
XVlI.2 Material analyses, procurement documents, calih ation information, nonconformance reports. and corrective action reports do not a;, pear in item 17.2 of the September 29, 1980 submittal.
Clarify.
t 4
1 1