ML19338F938
| ML19338F938 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 10/14/1980 |
| From: | Houston M, Konklin J, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19338F934 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-440-80-21, 50-441-80-19, NUDOCS 8010280058 | |
| Download: ML19338F938 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000440/1980021
Text
-.
.
.
.. -.
--
\\
.
o
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COFDlISSION
-
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
'
'
REGION III
Reports No. 50-440/80-21; 50-441/80-19
Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441
Licenses No. CPPR-148; CPPF-149
Licensee: The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
Company
Post Office Box 5000
Cleveland, OH 44101
Facility Name:
Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
Inspection At:
Perry Site, Perry, Oli
Inspection Conducted: September 30 - October 2, 1980
_Id/fN,TS
Inspector:
J. E. Konklin
-
,
Accompanying Personnel:
M. D. Ilouston, NRC-HQ
(October 1, 1980 only)
./ KK-
Approved By:
C.
. Willi @ , Chief
ld/II/j/'2)
2
Projects Section 2
'
'
Inspection Summary
Inspection on September 30 - October 2, 1980 (Report No. 50-440/80-21;
50-441/80-19)
Areas Inspected: Management meeting at CEI Corporate Offices; licensee
action on previous item of noncompliance; licensee actions in response to
IE Bulletins and Circulars; ongoing site construction activities.
This
inspection involved a total of 20 inspector-hours by one NRC inspector,
both at the site and at the licensee's corporate offices.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8010280 OET
s
c
,
5
DETAILS
,
Persons contacted
Principal Licensee Employees
+D. Davidson, Vice President, System Engineering and Construction
i
'
+ G. Groscup, Manager, Nuclear Engineering Department
i
+*M. Edelman, Manager, Nuclear QA Department
!
- P. Martin, General Supervising Engineer, PQS
- J. Kline, General Supervising Engineer, Construction
l
- F. Leidich, Construction QE Supervisor
.
S. Tulk, CQS Lead Electrical QE
l
E. Buzzelli, Assistant Licensing Administrator
'
M. Combs, CQS Engineering Aide
Region III Management (October 1 management meeting only)
"
i
+J. Keppler, Director Region III
+G. Fiore111, Chief, Reactor Construction and Engineering Support 3 ranch
+C. Williams, Chief, Reactor Projects Section 2
uther NRC Personnel
+ M. Houston, Perry Project Manager, NRR
+*J. Konklin, Perry Project Inspector, RIII
J. Hughes, Perry Resident Inspector, RIII
The inspector also contacted other licensee and contractor personnel.
!
- Denotes those attending the site exit interview on October 2, 1980.
+ Denotes those attending the management meeting at CEI HQ in Cleveland on
j
October 1, 1980.
!
j
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
i
~
(Closed) Noncompliance (50-440/80-09-01; 50-441/80-09-01) Inadequate require-
ments for N-2 nozzle modification activities. During this inspection, the
j
inspector reviewed the following documents related to the obtaining by CEI
of acceptance criteria for N-2 nozzle wall thickness.
j
1
'
a.
CEI Action Request AR-238, dated June 12, 1980, to GE requesting
acceptance criteria for minimum wall thickness for the N-2 nozzles,
with the GE response which failed to provide appropriate acceptance
criteria.
'
b.
CEI letter to GE, dated June 24, 1980, which stated that the GE
response to AR-238 was unacceptable.
l
-2-
.
.
.
.
,..
_ - . - .
,_
_
_
- - .-,-
r
,
.
o
c.
GE letter to CEI, datea 'uly 17, 1980, which provides " clarification"
.
of the GE response to AR-238.
d..
CEl letter to GE, dated July 18, 1980, which states that the GE response
is still unacceptable.
e.
GE letter to CEI, dated July 29, 1980, which provides appropriate
acceptance criteria for minimum wall thickness for the N-2 nozzles.
The inspector then reviewed the actual wall thickness measurements on
the twenty N-2 nozzles and discussed with the licensee the comparisons
of the measured wall thicknesses vs. the GE acceptance criteria. The
inspector concluded tha. the licensee has taken appropriate corrective
actions with regard to the above items of noncompliance.
Functional or Prcgram Areas Inspected
1.
Management Meeting and Site Tour
A meeting was held on October 1, 1980, at the CEI corporate offices
in Cleveland, Ohio, among CEI corporate management and RIII management
(denoted under Persons Contacted).
Included in the meeting were a re-
view of the licensee's performance on the Perry Project and discussions
of specific areas of interest relating to future Perry work activities.
A more detaileo discussion of the meeting is contained in RIII Report
(50-440/80-24; 50-441/80-22).
Following the management meeting, the inspector and the NRC-HQ Perry
Project Manager made a tour of the Perry site.
Included in the tour
was the observation of equipment status and work activities in the
Units 1 and 2 containment buildings, the Units 1 and 2 auxiliary
buildings, the intermediate building, the control complex, and the
fuel handling building.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
2.
Licensee Actions Relative to IE Bulletins and Circulars
The inspector reviewed the licensee's actions relative to selected IE
Bulletins and IE Circulars, to determine whether distribution was made
to the appropriate review groups, whether adequate evaluations were
performed and, where applicable, whether timely and appropriate respohses
were made to NRC.
Licensee actions with regard to the following IE Bulletins and Circulars
were evaluated and found to be adequate. These bulletins and circulars
are considered to be closed:
a.
-3-
-
..
._
..
_ . _ .
_
_
. . _ . .
__
. - -
_.
'.
s
t
' -
b.
IE Bulletin No. 79-17, Revision 1.
..c.
.
d.
e.
IE Bulletin No. 80-07, Supplement 1.
,
f.
't
g.
h.
IE Bulletin No. 80-17, Supplement 1.
i.
IE Bulletin No. 80-17, Supplement 2.
j.
k.
IE Bulletin No. 80-19, Revision 1.
1.
m.
IE Circular No. 79-04.
n.
IE Circular No. 79-07.
o.
IE Circular No. 79-12.
_
p.
IE Circular No. 79-18.
.
q.
IE Circular No. 79-22.
r.
-IE Circular No. 80-05.
I
s.
IE Circular No. 80-14.
t.
IE Circular No. 80-16.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Exit Interview
The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted under Persons
Contacted) at the conclusion of the inspection on October 2, 1980. The
inspector summarized the purpose and findings of the inspection.
i
,
1
,
1
-4-
. ,
- . _ . . .
_ _ _ , _ .
_ - , - . _ . _ , - . _ , , , , - .
~ . . - - - -
_