ML19338F649

QA Program Insp Rept 99900313/80-01 on 800728-31.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of 10CFR App B Criteria & Applicable Codes & Stds,Weld Specs, Weld Matl Control & Procurement

ML19338F649
Person / Time
Issue date:	08/27/1980
From:	Hunter V, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML19338F647	List: ML19338F646 ML19338F649
References
REF-QA-99900313 NUDOCS 8010270011
Download: ML19338F649 (9)

Text

,.

u m.

w

. gr',

T V.

^f" :.

g

.x 7

~.

m:

s A t:

D

g, $g ;'.;' t ;:; XJgs u Og:

2 c&.

l:

f%, s h;W

/*

..;r J:9;

-t

'~i v>

$f

. g:;l

'W, 0

~,N-Y ^' '

o:,

j y_

[f.. f%

Y-m U.'S." NUCLEAR REGULATORY CottfISSION:

1 W

',f s,

m 7,5F 0FFICE OF. INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT f

f.

p' 7

REGION?IV:

7

,4 NO;/

Q

~

x

[ Report No. 99900313/80 _

=y Program No.iS1300

Company

- -MurdockIncorporated-

>$1300 South Avalon Blvd..

'N

, =, =

wa' '

Compton,t California -.'90220

~

Inspection Conducted: ' July 28-31, 1980

" ^

d

.,/.'

-Iaspeeto'~rs :I ekQ -

[d7NE

-:V. H. Run~ter, Contractor % pector-Date~

./.

Components'Section-I 7'

~

Vendor Inspection' Branch i

x 3

J.

a:

j$

. Approved by:

k t

82h 8d 5

fV

..D.

E. Whi'tesell,. Chief: #

Date 7

Components Section.I:

1. 3' Vendor ~ Inspection Branch i:

.~Summarf y'

?.

-Inspectisa on' July:28-31,L19'80 (99900313/80-01)

^

~

n.

' Areas ~ Inspected:

Implementation of:10. CFR~ 50, Appendix B; Criteria and appli-n

cable. codes and-standards,. including-nonconformance and corrective action,

~

. Authorized Nuclea'r; Inspector.. interface.. Weldispecifications, weld material-Lcontrol, ar4 procurement.' TheJinsp'ection involved Twenty-Eight (28) inspection hours.on site, y.

3 =:

w.

~..

r

.jnesults: 1In the-five (5)' areas inspected,.there were no apparent deviations:

/*

.Vor unresolved 11temi identified.

3 g

e I

4

,s f

...O j

p 1

'e

..1 N-

}'

f x

t

' yl(,'

. c:

e=

<c

.y j

. s 3.j';

' ~N-

+

f Q:;

3 m

c m g%

lgf3pggy OQ a

d Mf@ ;;*? V[

+ " ' ^ ' '

N

~

'Y:

x

,? '?.'

' '. L

. fl 7.<-

g, M 2 n.t

,j,hb.

e

?

Y' p

Lt c

+

sg:% Q h 0 Q $ ".y g ' y & ",}?, ? ',

fC w:sd q.

y

~

y.

g,[g] ?.

se,

% m,

' g

).4-e-

~'

T^',

, e M *' %

ffNg;;;.%

• c.

T

^

l&.,

, ' : '[

z { ;.

- f @.

i v'jfg[ ' ~ ~ -

y-3 s;

f lw# :'--

+.1 W.f'y b

-t 4'

-T t,r n e.m **

.m, j

fr; Q

-,p'

' ~j

.[

a r

,Q 99 yj, t

.We;

-t.

.2.

y 7 p_.

.g m.

W..

y

~? :

q ',_, ~,

4'. A

'~

+

W t

g DETAII.S SECTION 7 a

l

^

I i

i k* A.:

. Principal Persons:Conticted-

?~

ff u p. 7, -

m.

,f FR4W

-HAG.:Murdock,{ President i

^

• W U Parker > Vice President'

+ -

1*S. rf. : Wallenman,.QualityL AssuranciManager 7

i" 1B.yC. Hill',1 Purchasing (Manager?

.W.;:T.~Ulco,.QC Supervisor; G.(Hill;; Authorized' Nuclear-Inspector 1

[

1

• Denotes those present.~at;the. exit interview seeting.

B.

-Nonconformance'and Corrective Action o.

~

1 9

~7 4

s

1.-

' Objectives l

~'

v..

i a

The' objectives lof'this area.of the'. inspection were to verify that:-

(

Procedures had.been developed:and approved 'iy the vendor that a.

prescribes laisystem for~ control of nonconformances,and assuring g

effective corrective ' action in' a manner consistent with NRC.

-rules a'ad regulation ~..ASME. Code requirements, and the vendor's

commitments inDthe:

>r

~

ASME accepted-Quality Assurance Program..

c

' ~

The;nonconformancel;and; corrective action' procedures are properly:

.l b.-

~

~

3 and effectively implemented by1the" vendor.

y

-/

Method'of Accomplishment-'

.i 4 2.

N

,..g w

[

The? objectives of this-area of the1 inspection were accouplished by:

j a

L l

f[7 a.

Review of the~ASME accepted Quality A'surance Manua'1, Section s

113;0: titled;"Nonconformities"-to' verify that the vendor had; F-i established; procedures that prescribed a system for3 identifying M

~

G % 3, 7and! reporting nonconformances;and requires corrective action.

)

4 e

1 bL 7 Review'of~the following procedures titledi e

\\

v M[

-f(1)) " Review and classification of nonconformities"

=

n i

.a s

6

-(2):,

Material Review Board"

\\

y, n

1

)A

/

~

L(3)!^," Corrective Action Program"'

d

~, '

~

. i r

2

.i 1

't Ng 4-

' tofverify(the systesLof ~ nonconformance provides identiff cation

..^

.i ac :. -

offinsp.-ction points, personnel responsible for identifiyation, j

a

?#

j[ W

' f

p

[]p;;'g, j ~

'd y.

W,. I ff f

-W N '

l s

s ;,

,.,4('*"

W ne.

_. %n

~

,~

1' 7psga - - '

t Q 6,;, ?

1

..c g,

1 ~

3

yl

" ~

s,

'(h L, -QQ: iM: -

e 0

p t

4

" ' q4- ""

y

}

1

'1 m =.gw.,-

a..,

s

,. -. ~:

.e, s

m... e -

a a

.M I^

jdh b N3 b f

• N Y.t

-;.A

., h 2 n x

,~

O

.b

)

d z

f(, MP'. _g.,,*~;:.?-: mM g~,y$NMN

..m uh M _

74\\[ i N'7

[~ ~

^

.m w

3(, ~3 43.

.D.

W:

1 x

~

s

+9:

. g. '

s

~

,.,,..7; e

.g lQ

'y.f hy Y-L W

',(

y qu s

_; M

- ~ ~ s W

2

~

g; e

. 3; y

K

=

f y_

sn' E

1

-, v 2

~

"m E

^ inspection' method,; acceptance ~ criteria,personasl7 responsible,_.

l T;~.3 for nonconformance:and-for resolution,: segregation'of.ites, t

,4 and' distribution o'f report.- '

~

17 j

- w' c

x. ~

m.

~t Au c.1

. Review (of.the.followingprocedurestitled:

'(1) M" Discrepant Material Dispositions".

a

'N,

[

(2)' !"Dispositiion" ^

U to verify thel aysties of(corrective? action procedures. have-LbMen.

approvedfand are. consistent'with.the ASME! accepted Quality _.

i AssuranceiProgram and' identifies thelresponsibility for1 i

i receipt :and ^ analysis of nonconformance reports',1 recommending -

g

=

corrective action,Lapproving: corrective action,;& follow-up, O

to assure corrective; action. is effective and precludes 1 recur-:

rence.;JAlso, verify the corrective? action. procedures: provide 9

for managemen, participation in nonconformance report and c

corrective action review.

f sma - -

d.

Rdiew of fourteen (14) nonconformance reports:to verify 1that.

• %g the nonconformance and_ corrective action procedures were pro -

7 perly. implemented in that the assigned responsibilities were carried-out,' the identification and reporting of nonconformances and the evaluation and' enacting of the corrective action was-y'

~

c timely and effectiver nonconforming items?were properly dis t.

posed'of;-corrective ~ action followup ~was effectively performed, management participation ~was. active-and effective.

e M

Interviews.with. personnel to verify they were aware of and e.

• ~

had access to the nonconformance and corrective action-procedutes.

3.

Findinas a.-

The inspector verified that:

w s

-(1)

Procedures ~hadybeen developed and approved by the; vendor i

that pre'scribedna systee for: control' of nonconformances M

P and assured effective corrective action in a mannericon-:

~

N e

fre sistent with NRC rules ~and regulations,'ASME' Code require-

1. h" i ments,- andi he vendor's f commitments Iin the ASME accepted ~

^-

t

~

~.

Quality: Assurance Program.

7 (2) i

' ~

The nonconformance~and. corrective action procedures were-properly and effectively implemented by~the= vendor.

w

~ m (3)slThere;was;noiapparent deviations from commitments or-

,c F

unresolved; items.

1

,, 0 1

l

[

t

- l W7 4

s

'n..~- ?$

_;\\

.4

[ 'fl% ?GO'f r-(l y.

j,.

s

.. e,, ;

F.

1.

yl,,

~

x 1r f

j;-

, y Sjp ' " ]Q

g c

,f$$

Y

' NE O_

S nA C

^

~

C

~ ' J p

_[] s 7 g W' %.77M l(;A g ly

~ w:

A

,s l' -.

3, ' ' ff. f.;g, g]y R dd/ qQQg:, g, p. 7yW g.a:. gg.

f y

^

m

+

%%ver#.,

e' m u

4 m

,4;.-

~ Ny;M - w@74f., _

mg,u i < 7

'. s

' s.n. ~.p#eig

. a

.p 4'h

', f

,/....

A w,; gg,

a9 4 _

y v.

e..

7,,

1 s

w m_

y m

c-y f.s; A_.

,~C.' M ANI?(Authorized' Nuclear' Inspect'or) Interface =.

p:f

'Q q h

1!

~

n-

. :4 s

o p p'.;

n.

n

+

y

,. w rs g

7 J1.

' Objectives' fd

=v Nw :

n:

n

,a w

,u.

m n

t

.1..

a x

-The objectivesfof this.inspectionL were :to. verify thatn N

a y'

w

.c:

-[

' f, s The ANI.has: direct contact withLthe cogniz' ant plant QA/QC W',a.mwv'C' ' + +**

e,

-1 M

j L

x'

.a;

-representstive.

.s Jh r

x

~

b.

sThe ANI has.f m ' access tog'all j2rts of-the plant 7 concerned 1 u,

r

with' supply lortmanufactureof.ASMECodework.

R 7

s

- :(

a i,

c.

HAlliapplicable1 documents are available to'the ANI for.reviewy E

v w

y

. d.1 The~ANI"identifieslandEsigns off on witness hold points or

' process control documents and.witne'sses the qualification of" a

i

.special:3DE procedures..

y

y n.1 e'.

The_ANI maintains a log of activities reviewed and or witnessed.

3 2.

Method'of Accomplishment v'N

~

xN

[

h preceding-objectikes;were accomplished by:-

'.N

~

~

w

~7%

= = aI Review of Sectian 12.0 K the ASME accepted'QA Manual. %

t

~

b Discussion with the ANI.

%~1

,m

.E N

y

..- ' Review of the ANI-log book of inspeEtion activities.

3 s

e 3.

Findinas:

s The ANI is;a Kemper Insurance itenerant. inspector whofis assigadd B

a.-

.toi his shop ca an as needed basis.

~

?

(

_c A.

t x

b

~

~

,x

' c~

b.

.Alllnec6sary documents;are made available to the ANI. -The ANI-has access to all plant facilities.related-'to his work.

c.

Review of.the ANIJinspection log established itfwas consistently' A=intained.

3-Withinithistarea of the. inspection, no"'deviati'ons from-'com '

M xn 1

?

.W-d.

~

~

7%

M mitment or unresolved items were identified.

r v

"~~

v

]

.D. J Control'of Special-Procasses:

s,-

W eldina Procedure Spe;1fication

.m

~

gw x

4, O? LObjective

• 6.^.

M _.

$y '.g~, :f4 % E thetwelding(procedureispecificationsLused by thejvendorfin' production Y J:The objective offthis area of the inspection ~was to determine if'

. A

.y

~

a, :

a 3

k?'-

N[ q Qg p

%;$ OQp h' I A 5?

~+

' ' ~

3

_ y ;UA..,. >

4 e-W, yt: - 2n m

i

- - >u n,

y'._

.ir nm.

g m-J i

~

Q V

c

, 3 y;~

c.. -- ;pl7agygg ' ', %- :l<

, g y.p.

.u

h(Mj[$f _

_ s

&Ny -

w"-

.f eg a-pw s-

,t% f mem; gTr$'

~

g..

% %e _m 5

3,.

. ~ p<.

zy, g -'

s p

'4 W,

O_

5-

• /

yy fi'...

qm _

i'

'=

w -

Ewelding had~been prepared, qualified and controlled in accordance.

ws _-

with the applicable 3NRC; regulation, the ASE accepted Quality fAssurance Program,'and/AS m (Code 7tefuirements.

~'

[

p=,

53 3 v[.

]+w-

_2.

EMethod of Accomplishment.

fee %

~

y e=a

.Thejobjective of'this area of the~ inspection was accomplished by:

..x

=-

P[

a' 5 Review of _the ASME ' accepted Quality Assurance Manual, Revision; 4-

,4

-Section.7,0,Lto. verify whether the vendor had established pro -

~

cedures_for the preparation, qualification, certification, dis-

_. 4

'tribution, and revision of welding procedure specifications.

m$# y bi

~ Review of Welding procedure 3007-CS-4,c and 3007-CS-11, to verify that all essential variables, supplementry essential tF

~

' variables and nonessential variables are in accordance with e ;

the applicable Sections,of the ASME Code.

M y

n 1

m c.

. Review of Certification 1874 and 1739 to verify that:

~

'(1) The procedures hadlbeen qualified in accordance with Section IX of the ASME Code and the supporting precedure 4

l qualification records were on file.

4 (2); The procedures qua'lification records had been certified iby the. vendor and the mechanical test results meet or g

exceed the minimum ASME Code ' requires ents.

~

=(3) -The procedure qualification record' lists the essential

. variables for the specific welding processes and the m

H values and ranges of the variables >are consistent'within

- the limits of Section-IX of -the ASME Code.

m 4

d.

Review of the Welding Procedure Specifications and Procedure

' Qualification Records listed in paragraphs b. and c. above to s

c.;

V verify;that:

y

. (1)' All mechanical tests, required by Sections III and IX of

-the ASME Code, had been completed and are properly docu-f mented'in.the procedure qualification records.

(2) Changes-and/or revisions of essential variables in any r

_gM welding procedure specification, is supported by requali-

~

' fication: documents.

m (3):Chandesinthenonessentialvariablesofthewelding x

procedure specification are properly identified and y,

m.

Tr documented.

D f

w M^^

, 5h a,..,.

Ef

\\ k.

'A_'

a.-

u O 'g ~$4

$ P3 U 'b,,{& * -

3,,

g o

.m.

. J. -

y W-

~

+:;, 2:

ye-W b f s,

g g@jA' '

,cc,MgM Di,3 ~ ~, N. ',,, %,

4

, m.

pc

?%

. :. y2-:- f..;_u^..,

y' 9 g g [ x g_.

55N ' '

=

^ = -

~*

~,

w

~

n S

a 9

u

-.k

?

s

~

'f.

10bservation-in thershop to verify that: the welding procedure.

t q

b

,ispecificationslaretavailableito dhep eldersland the spe(ffi.2 A+;=im===H m

m

[ym.4e="' t cations. are properly followed.

~.

4 3

TInterviews with peEsonnel to verify they.are knowledgeable p-in the procedures applicable to welding.-

3.

/

F.

. Findinas #

'j

'L y

_i a.

1The inspecto.r verified that the welding procedure specifications-q

y ~

Y used:by the.; vendor in production welding had been. prepared, d

qualified-and contro11ediin.accordance with the applicable NRC q

m regulations the-ASME? accepted Quality Assurance Program,-'and

- the?ASME Code.

_ 3 1

b.

. Within this area-of the inspection no deviations or:unresol ed 0

items were identified.

~

U4 E.

Manufacturina Process Co trol Weldina Material Control-1.

Objective q

The objective of this area of the-inspection was to verify that-velding material is identified and controlle'd until it is consumed in-the welding process;in'accordance with the applicable NRC rules and Regulations and the ASME accepted Quality Assurance Program.

gi

~

2.

Method of: Accomplishment -

g w en g

The objective'of this area of the insp'ection-was accomplished by:

Review'of the'~ASME accepted Quality Assurance Manual Sections:

a.

(1) 7.8:

" Storage"'

~

.3

-(2) 7.12.-'" Reserve Welding Material Control"

=

~ (3) - 7'.13 - Qualification 'of Welding -Material"

<=,

w.

to verify: that procedures had been established for purchasing, m#w A

receiving, distribution and. handling of 'trelding=materieln*

- s = m.,'-

b.

Review of welding ~ records and parts-being welded,=to verify

- that distribution of~the welding material is being controlled

~

mm ".

in accordance with approved procedures, and that' unused welding materials are-scrapped,'or recycled, in accordance

^

<with the procedures.

~

~

.a s

..i f

e-a m

u,

y v_ ej yo a

s

g:.

m%g, weg

- n y : 3m:xy : = x

, ;7 -

s g

w w,

=

w n; p, z,;

7,

,z

~

~ f.y g

.c V

~

~

_.u..

g; a

Nl&

-wpm

~ ' ~ -

a

.,g

' ~

^

u-(

'~jm

^

a Observation in the 3 hhp welding-area and storage' area, tot

~

Lc.

3' gg:p;.= #*

Lverify that-f

'(1)L Welding materials'are clearly identified at all~ times 2

in accordance,with the: approved-procedures,.and that the identification of acceptable materials was being Ojj

^

saintained through-out"the_ storage and manufacturing operations, until>the material is' consumed in the

. elding process.

w h' -

'(2) Welding material requiring environmental control is.

~'

. held at-the; appropriate storage, and/or baking temper-i

,atures,:for the time specified in the procedure.

1 d.

Interviews with personnel to verify they are. knowledgeable j

.of;the vendors procedures applicable to Welding Material

. Control.

7

\\

i 3.

Findinas v

a. NThe. inspector. verified that welding material is identified v

~ 'nPcontrolled.until ~it -is-consumed in"the welding process

/j a

-u in accorda'nce,with.-NRC regulations,"the ASE accepted Quality

. Assurance Progranis.

~

~

j

= b.-

a

~

-Within this area of the inspection no deviations or unresolved f

g

' items were identifled.

M F.

. Procurement Document Coitrol' g2 ?

1.

Objectives 1

4 The objectives cf this area of the inspection were to verify that:

Procedures..had been prepared and approved by the-vendor that

]

a.

prescribes a system for procurement document control which' w]

isiconsistent 'with NRC rules 'and regulations, ASE Code, and-

1. g the vendor's commitments. in th_e._ ASE accepted 'QualRf*As::urance j

~

-Program..

, -c

= " ' ' ~

,9=r= =-

p u-s=-=-= ~b.

The procurement document' control procedures are properly and i

.effe:tively implemented by the vendor.

.2..

Method-of: Accomplishment y

The objective of this area of the inspection. was ' accomplished by:

m w" ~W

%w

a '..

Review of the ASE accepted Quality l Assurance Manual, Section.

m i

=

4

= g

,I w

wm b

,r[-

m?.

l..

5

~

b-e.

w

~

f '

.j.(

s

~

,f., _-:

~ ~

n W= n if?

~*~~ b $$';:'1m,

,9

-c W

y.{

' i W.*

r

_p q

^

bh u&< l@

C~

X f

%W rri.

,,_.--w-=-

..x-w &

• W_%.

pqv

3,.

~.

h ~

%Qi[ 'h-.Q }'

3 y

i )fQ_.b' ' ' hhAN

.. : 4%

v.j&W^^*ja,6-%-- M...

.'.,y j

Qy u >k V

A P

W@,

. 8i M#

n M.

=

Y~

_._^

? -

w mw.......

v

, 4" '.

w n 3.0 titled "ProcurementLDocument-Control.to verify:that the:

?

? vendor had established pr,odedures that prescribed a' system for-procurementLdocument~contfol.

c-f n'

~Reviefofthe:followinghrocedurNs:

' b.

m p

g:.

Y

'5 n e ' ~. - -

^

-(1) 3 ; 3,M' ' Purchase / Orders"

.x" M,=:mg, _

am F.

(2) 3.6 D '.' Approved ~ Vendor Lisii"* ~ -==- ~ ~

p l(3) 3.11-J5'ubcontractedServices"

^

.f

-C

-to verify they have been prepared by the designated authority, appfoved by responsible' management 'and reviewed by QA.

t y

Reviewed these~ selective purchase orders; 2265M, 25407M,

-27712N k19082M, 19467M, 20656M,:23687M, and 30253M to verify p-

.that the scope of-work:to.be performed is identified,-the f'

technical requirements 'are specified, test and inspection criteria is identified, special instructions and requirements

@ [,

identified, suppliers.:are required to have a docuserted QA program..and procurement documents are reviewed prior to release-for-bid anWor contract award.

o n

s

~

d.

Review of the following selective documents:

,x (1) Procurement'do'cuments

~

~

~

.(2) Purchase requisitions g

l(3) Purchase orders

~~

F (4) Technical documents

~

i to verify the procurement procedures are being properly and effectively" implemented-in accordance with the procedures, and g

++w s==""^that ' distribution for procurement ~1ocuments had been established and was current.

'Interviewswithpersonneltoverihythey-wereknowledgeable e.

-in the procedures applicable procurement-document control.

<3.

Findinas-

a.

LThe.-inspector verified that:

(1)- Procedures'had.been prepared and approved by the vendor

- y

that prescribed a system for procurement dociment control which is consistent with NRC rules and regulations, ASME

.i.-

p-Y X

4

{

n,.

n.

a a

s s

gl.

t Nh

,3 y-

&lZ,

.u w h& _

=,7 :a -- %.3p%;W' ' ? '::rggg. - -

,~,

? !

4-_

w;-

~

ay;g a, p,

w s

,4;.

w ;-

e-Y: -

l},,

~

~~?^

m. a p

,-9.

1

-YJ is Code,:andithe vendor's commitments in:the ASME accepted

,c #

Quality Assurance' Program.

1. ~

g (2)f The' procurementL document control-procedures were properly J

and effectively; implemented by the vendor.

~

l.(3)i There was no apparent deviations from commitments or.

m4 yp=-

- ~ ; unresolved-items.

e=

~

-j

G.:

Exit Interview-

~

The inspector: met with management representatives at the conclusion j

of the inspection on July 31,c1980.. The inspector summarized ~the scope and findings-identified-during the inspection. Management acknowledged 5-l the. inspector's comments regardingLthe scope-and findings as presented.

ll i

i i

'i i

j p_ -- --_ _ -- { % 4-~-D ' ' ' ~ ~

=~# ~ Z - -CM g.

s

~~..=-

i

^

y p

9 a

k' s

9

\\'..

g 1

-p -

.~

p

,V

?

d

.a s.

g.-*..'

9

• 1 d

r y