ML19338D229
| ML19338D229 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/02/1980 |
| From: | Adam L AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Bradford P, Kennedy R NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19338D228 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8009220190 | |
| Download: ML19338D229 (2) | |
Text
--
9 Inon E. Adam Leon E. Adam 936 Hess Dr.
935 Hess Dr.
Lebanon, Pa La banon, Pa.
Fay 2, 1980 j$
Dear Mr. Kennedy,
o
Dear Mr. 3radford,
C As a rate payer in the Met-Ed area, I feel that M
As a resident in the twenty mile radius of TMI I should have some say on the final decision M
I feel that I have a viable reason to stqte on whether or not TMI unit 1 should be allowed my thoughts. In the intrest of brevity I 11 to re-start.
%g, forgo a letter full of retoric and large-ggg impressive words and state my beliefs in a As a father who raised my children in this more simple form.
O.
area, I still have no fear of remainin6 here.
I was here when TMI first started.Senerating I am abrongly in favor of re-starting TMI unit electricity in 1972 and. I was here on March one. The sooner this occurs the better off we 28 1980. And if Unit 1 should be allowed to as rate payers will be. We do need the power re-start I will remain here.
this plant has generated in the past. I feel no fear in remaining in this area since most Nor do I see any real danger in the venting of the mater.ial I'v read and atudied has of the krypton 6as a a catalist in moving -
indicated to me that nuclear generated power along with the cleanup at TMI.
is as on?e as 'any other method of power Eeneration.
I can not stato stron6 y enough how definatB 1
I-feel our need is for a good mix of nuclear I also feel that tha cleanup should go forward coal and hydro generated power. We do need!
and proceed to its earliest finish. Therefore to cut back sharply on our foriBne imports of I also favor venting of the krypton 85 from oil. Nuclear ener6y will assist us in doing unit 2.
so.
As a met-ed customer and a resident of this I feel there is enough reasonable information area, I can see no good in closing down this to indicate the safty of nuclear ener6y. There plant. Thc economic ramifications would be are. many more _ people who feel as I do as,
too great to imagins. It would affect not only compared to those who disa6ree.
I respectfully those employed for the utility by those of us request that you concider the economic
~
uho rely on them for our livelybood in other ramifications of not allowing TMI unit 1 areas.
Please concider the drastic effects to re-start.
on our area were not TMI 1 not reactivated.
Very Sincerely, lank You
.u,I m t- - -.
W