ML19338C143
| ML19338C143 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/22/1974 |
| From: | Rohrbacher R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Vetter W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19338C141 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008050591 | |
| Download: ML19338C143 (2) | |
Text
'
N
,,,iic,, g s.
/
%s UNITED STATES I.
o Dl ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS i
.)
/
REGtON lll 4,#*'8 5 #
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD mmg OI2) 45s.2660 GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS. 6o137 N
May 22, 1974 F
W. E. Vetter, Technical Assistant to the Director
^
-Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region III CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY - MIDLAND PLANT MANAGEMENT ATTITUDE -
QA/QC ACTIVITIES
-Comments identified in RO inspection reports and in correspondence from CP indicative.of management attitude relative to QA/QC activities of the Midland project are summarized below:
1.
RO Inspection Reoort No.-50-329 and 330/71-01 and Letter, Youngdahl to Grier, dated Februarv 5, 1971 CP management was responsive to required corrective action relative to'AEC violations.
2 '. Letter, Howell=to Grier, dated July 26, 1972 Cooperative attitude indicated relative to K0;III request concerning the valve wall thickness verification program.
3.
RO Inspection Reoort No. 50-329 and 330/73-01 Positive' attitude was indicated toward matters of concern to RO:III pertaining to. restart of construction.
- 4. ~RO Inspection Reoort No. 50-329 and 330/73-06 Management involvement' ralative to revisions to quality assurance marual indicated responsive attitude.
5.
RO Inspection Report No. 50-329 and 330/73-08 Scheduling arrangemen v forlthe management interview at the conclusion of the referenced inspt :: ion were.somewhat unresponsive.
f fR
% e.wwt x
8008050 N [
4 F
. m.
z
=m
?
m
- = w..
- s g
n 8
'a
[J
.=
~
' 2-
. May 22, 1974
'W..E.'Vetter
.6. i O Inspection Report No. 50 29 and 330/73-09_
R Positive' attitude was indicated relative to modification and expansion t-i.
l "I
-l RO Inspection Report No. 50-329 and 330/73-11 c
7.
Statements and action taken~ relative to QA/QC program deficiencies-indicated positive attitude toward QA/QC_ program.
8.
RO Inspection Report No. 50-329 and 330/74-01 Substantive and effective action taken relative.co.QA/QC program commitments and implementation of these commitments indicated positive attitude.
R. A. Rohrbacher
.'~
Reac, tor Inspector s
e44 i
i
' O n
}
A i
4.,
"4, a
4 k
q T-e[
4 6.
que