ML19338B851

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Special Operating Procedure R-2-79-22, Testing of Condensate Polisher Control Air Sys & Air-Operated Valves W/Water in Instrument Air Supply
ML19338B851
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/09/1979
From:
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR R-2-79-22, NUDOCS 8001200068
Download: ML19338B851 (8)


Text

.

.,3

$$fl.lME

/ 4~5 /

~

?2 e eED o A E rc

/A)/A o D o n E AG O w/ C

~

~

$'k A /d Jy S hE M

's.

1 l

8001200068

.c.

~ ~ y;.,

--L/L 4i-J}mgW.

r J - --- -

v

'~

i AP 1001 Tb te Mile Island Nuclear Station SIDE 1 Figure 1001-8 Special Operating Procedure SDP Noes ~~?S 22 (F,om SOP t.og indean NOTE:

Inste uctioas.nd 9uidelines in AP 1001 Unit No.

must b. followed wnen complet.ng this fof ff%

Date 4-9 -79 ndy o/dS,,Je,,sde 8lirAer ant'<*I A; S N ~ cl f

1.

Title Are w-LJ rJer

-JS br-i, ~.44e in e-.!<n<n-/ er n,-.nh.

//

s./

/

'"'P

,'L"*'""*. *" ' ?*% ye,A.n Y/fL. ac pa.kd anJans<dcyohshoe ya.ga3 %,jh

,,.4..,., <, y%e in s-m<nf p e hae f & pa /;rja <. n -

a-n umro/ yd.

3.

Attach procedure to this form written according to the following format.

A.

Limitations and Precautions 1.

Nuclear Safety 7fbMMM 2.

Environmental Safety 3.

Personnel Saf ety i

4.

Equipment Protection y

B.

Prerequisites C.

Procedure

4. Generated by 8.22:Mmev7n.
  1. Date

<S-S 7 9

-~

5.

D uration of SO P - sw.H d. no ion,,, in.n so e.,,,,om in..,,,.. e t. o, tn. so P or t.) o, <=> d.io w -

nren..., occu, fi,st.

(a)

SOP wiil be cancelled by incorporation into existing or new permanent procedure submitted by O

(b) SOP is not valid af ter Am/e -d'on O

(fin in circumst.nc/s wnien well r. suit in SOP be.ng cancelled)

P

~

S.

(a) is the piacedure N uclear Saf ety R elated?

If "yes", complete Nuclear Sale $y Eva!uation. isia. 2 ov tnis Pormi YesO NoI (b) Does the procedure affect Environmental Protection?

YesO No EST If "yes", comp!ete Environmental Evaluation. is.e. 2 o, in.. s

,m>

o YesO No.8 (c) Does the procedure af f ect radiation exposure to personnel?...................

NOTE:

if

.H.nswer s ar. "no**. t he en.ng. rney ee.opro.eo by the Sn;f t S u per visor.

If.ny avestions

... m -..o 1.s. in. en.ns. mv.t n..oo,...a e y :n. si. tion suo im.no.numa suo.nmene.nt.

7.

Review and Aperoval

"<Y.

d T 7I Approved - Shif t Supervisor Reviewed - t.ist members of PoRC conheted D. /2W

r% N<<-~ W3

$1 65/

  1. j h AOJ,. h /.k b.d.- h55 /b/74 i% -

cMhr Approve cStation S ;parinten:'ent/ Unit Superir!Iendent A. $d e-v.k bb..~,f/?

SW7/

d

/

0 3.

SOP is Cancelled SNf t S@ervisor/Sn.st C o.. awn C.t.

TMt 63 445 O

OO O

n rsU U

e

.s-

~~.

s...

l y'*~~~~~~K~.

,y w w

L.

i "

"EV ALUATIO N" MeV- /

. l SIDE 2

@ 1001 Three f,%!e Island Nuclear Stati:n SOP No. E-2-/9-2:.

R;ure 1001-8 Nuclear Saf ety/ Environmental Impact Evaluation

.,.L,,,

,,f&,,Janga_;f;: P,' /;she,-comb a / Air.$ys)m ud An pra.)c,J y,A 'c & c! E ~ h in 0 Trs 4~n-wrl a.:c-s-r:rr:r /u K<

1. Title

//

.)

2.

Nuclear Safety Evaluation Oces this SOP:

-s

  • (a) increase the prcbability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of

............. yesO nog equipment important to saf ety?.............

  • (b) cre'Ne the pos:ibility for an accident or malfunction of a diff erent type than any evaluated

........................ yes O n M previously in the safety analysis report?.

  • {c) reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technical specification?.... Yes O no e.n.

e., io

.on.... no". Attoch addetsonal c..ges d seawires1.)

Details of Evaluation ie.oi..n on sys& 7.s n-n-sY.e rs'a.!.ed.

p (o.) ')he p i.s/sr 40>yyMJ pilo" -- 1l d*" '~*

~ V" h "' T l

(b') 7^* a.

4 fead & WSG 5 * '~ "'"b 5-c.cndensa:6 pp. 2

&ndcc:.sa.;tl pllsi " i.s 77 Y

'Y

-W-b (c:)

The Evaluation By <c. /M~af.,.,

M ate.4-9-29 3.

Eneironmental Im> act Evaluati,n Does this SOP:

(a) possibly involv significant environmental!rrn

.... yes no O

/

h=* a significant adWrse effect the environment?.......

.......... yes O no

.e a significant envirp ental matter or questic not eviously reviewed and enleated by the N.R.V.

yes no O Detail-. Evaluation Evaluation By Date

' NOTE: If these owest'ons.r "yes", the change must eeceive N. A C. at prowel.

at th:s revie it <md..

Pcac rev.ew or evalai;on is reaute ee om s n,muesice by t8e station sup,riniene.ntiunit suportni-neent.

4.

R eview e

f t.e FCCC mwsr cer+st of two of f+te memners.)

A.

1.

// \\-

2.

r PORC C54.rrnan S;gnature Cate Ct. See.a, mee,s 1

0 $clx 6

G4

& 9 7f u.

Station Su ecini.cauent/ Unit Sw9(renteadent oete l-

,. - -.~-

- 2:

(.

- C q

...... A.. -.A : LA-s.~, d n Ans -

i.. m / ~..s,e.

. I..-..

.s-e......

s.-_s : cn-42s.k, -

a.ce

. 3. --.%s.mnef Sk._

An e...

y

.. -.4.. q y n c n L n s c J n =

n~'7 oel.

s'.

olIsbe fy

. -/Ae A

A n-a-ss. Y e-g_,

.-.-..... - Q f k... A C,, A.y.- a A,, a n - h.- k,,,. % q-f C -...

'\\

/g g

/*

/

-- /I~ d'd n

  • t'7 d-8P 46er$s% 4 f.e.g.ar 4 --

.-. a _cnw.:}

-s. A 6._&,- a,4 s-w i

p,. m..em..

V-R.

Se c.=-g

.s -lcs -

mu

.-~

/.--.O 57. 7 % d e s e n h s k c..-- $ /,$ k e...co JA R~ l,f

  • ~

,f.

./

.37

.s,S

/,

r v /

r

/

,-f i. // < fen-5"te,

--o?. 7A

.+] s 7C/.sk;;l d=.r 72e,.~/.-s'.c nd -Ad'.n:de....-w u ~-

NL-e i

a St-'ee

&.-,C2&M $n * *

.e n d e t* V de. cu c% f f o' p o f,

,__ i sco a m o..,

.f..er s e', ro- &c.

r. py-g1.pl

.... j. t..

t m j:7a ss..,3 a-j'>y. ' - 4 m.

~. re. y w,.....

-. Pi-r.ii,. r e

cc S N h}

t*4.l2e

. ~~O - V. /s,- -

-_.-_C B-xsd.se.<e:__

D J.--. p f m 2 : ) e,, k rd _ _AAr4,s4~..yc>&,fa.c%d_

c.'~7~'

...... s.. Adm.-4.. n.&. n,4 :2...;n n',

/.~-...:L. 6.,.y.. / nL.1. _-

. ;n 4.y-hs.% /-,,, n,M c~J.,a.f a'n

,,e pm

....yre sm<e... a a.~i2

. r,,,N,

<.<,d c r._ slm e, )./, Ji, b ~n

,1 4 ~.,.c a d.. v... & _ m - 7 A s, %

u.. d. _.... J,.

f.

.---..k-

$4f *'d...

._fC f

e.v._i r-, 4

.W

.y

/t f _.e%-**

rr4C]

&a:c.-

4,.,c,/.e n&s.s.

. rns.kcd..% _-/.s Ao.. _.-

J c./,,yag, _

s'

/.......0, f2 % O. O.L.n9 5q ey~ 1-

./

Q (( M y T -/ 1..... ~

., ; r.,.. ' *..

[.. ~. / l s

-4

.... -. ~,.....

.. ~., -

. e t

.........: :. 1 n

. J..W Q J U ;. C ku G

. LA 94-u t-P.

...t 4.,

..,,. ; f ;..

..s f4... c2 r..,,.,. t......

.a,..

.,., sg, -.,

, v., yy,.,..,.. 3,3,,,:4.,.g;

..,.,g f., g,,. 42, x e

e 1,. ?_ T ~ ' _' *l, '

,,,g,,wmggm m o ms e.*

A

%ccL.,.a anL'J_

x,

4...

2-*.sn. 0.- _ct 7r.. -red.s. a.n d. ins -lr~d e :r..d-A.'n - O f

hm.e.s.

rywh s fr$

./.-A4e

-.3

.7_a m ~~.c.

_s.. -_ vc

,,..-H2 x<.. uf

~, J,-d ~,

J.a<.-/,. :n3. ad-d

_. c....._. S - a./.y n 4 2...y a 4-J

~ a.-ka,, ~c42_. 7,,,-- >,.

d-l.

y b

..A 4c # &ny.~/ 2_

..- -_. - __ 'rs co yyn,.-s4<~ v2L. eni$ yolidec y

..__ ya hd.w byya.s.s w.8e.

c o - v i.2.,

=

e.

Dmm

. et

. gr o-

.g

.d a

(.,13.

..e.e y

f i

r,..

s.

~.

.*a.

..cy v-

", = * ~.

.g=,=,

., ;, Q..<;.,.,. q.,

,,q

... - =

~ ',,

+

~

. s,;;se,. y,, 'i,

  • . e. *b - l ' -:.=._..; X.-%._,: g,'.;; ; ;.- '~.,,.. j.,

p*

.... fa ~. -

l r*.,.*_~; s s... *...

. s n =; *n:,.. '

. s a.:

..,:". p,,%e 4 1;.. ;; - f.,g (;, *, ' *. n* *

. ~ ~

gg g

.e._

...i.+-o.

.-s.

.N'8

  • 88'"

N *-..

e.

m

.s o A'P 1001 Thrt.e Mile Island Nuclear Station SO P No. N - 3 ' 2 -2 2._

Special Operating Procedure

{

  • Figure'1001-8

.i (Frem SOP Log lad m)

.g NOTE:

Inst,wct6ons and guide 6ines in AP tool Unit No. _ c7 -

s troust be followed wnen cornpleteng f.

Date $r dfl f this f orret 1.

TitIe eYGnc:!ws 73 },.s be e & :lre-( Afri.cusd n n.-l

\\

er

/

);1;y q d }c.j y d e.s

,s42 -~*^ W ' W insS ~~~ & " r '~ff g-

~

'"' S""~,'h[ 'X',L p,

.,6.,, a f -As a.: g u.&d Arn}

~

- m'.i2. + ada k A h 24wn-d a-Is-kne p 9/.g g

es yoh.rAu- % n m 4.I p d

3. Attach procedure to this f orm written according to the following format.

A.

Limitations and Precautions.

1.

Nuclear Saf ety ggQM C

2.

Environmental Safety 3.

Personnel Safety 4.

Equipment Protection B.

Prerequisites f

~

C.

Procedure 4.

Generated by 67. /,_.eM f --ca_ f,,,

/ M Fate 4- - =7 n f

<-w g

'A.

5.

D ura tion of SO P_ - sn.n t. no ion, r in.n so d.ys e,an. i~..neci.

d.se o, in. SOP or (a) or (b! below - whichev.r occ.us firrt.

6' SDP will be cancelled by incorporation into existing or new permacent C

- icedure submitted by

't0P i: not valid af ter ComMc /<'oad O

(fits in circumstances which win resuit in SOP being canceHed) 6.

(a) is the.;ucc.edure Nuclear Safety Related?

If "yes", complete Nuclear Safety Evaluation. <s;d. 2 ov inis rarm)............... Yes O Nog (b) Does the procedure affect Environmental Protection?

YesO nom If "yes", complete Environmental Evaluation. is;d. 2 or in.s so,m)

YesO Nng (c) Does the procedure affect radiation exposure to per:annet?...................

NOT E:

ff.it ans== s are no. the enange

c. y me sooroved by the sheet s uper visor.

If any ouestions

.,.. m....o y

. in. en.ng. must e. aco,o.ed by in. sr

.on super.niendeni/un. su per ine.no.ne.

7.

Reviewand Accroval

~

proved - Shif t Superviscr

[h.2M&/L_

4 /4 b9 of PORC onNed[ DOL %&GSM

' f y -Q.g [

%D Reviewed, List ember Y-6A

[

f

<4Ao U. n u t t is L'.

Approve?cStation Superintendent / Unit Superintehent N4-I f

r <

e...

M

8. S0P is Cancelled

~

[/

sh.fi superv sorish f t Foeern.n

.,,.,,, _, C e t e

.]._

4 75

..,T V.i 63 Q 39

) h M

. )

,. - :w-...

't

, _ ',;.,,.:yi..

n n

.:. G ~. ;.2..;', "j....,.,,,.,,,.],,.....-._.__..ww,.,...~3-q7 --- - -]y-;d -d. b.4 u-d..

mggy r.

v-.

v ID AP.1001 Three Mile Island Nucicar Station SOP No 2.7-B-z y p.agure 1001-8 1

.luclear Saf ety/Env.ironmental impact Evaluation g

a d" '-

!i#

d

/ A'<

"$'"-

  • dd A N a-1* Title N y&e-Im g.c 4 d Irv & Tnsh- " & & w ql.

y 2.

Nuclear Safety Evaluation Does this SOP:

.s increase the probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malf unction of

  • (a) e.quipment important to saf ety?............................... yesO ng cigte the possibility for a' accident or malfunction of a different type than any evaluated
  • {b) previously in the safety analysis report?........................... YesO nag
  • (c) reduce the margin of safety as defined in the basis for any technic 61 specification?..... yes nog 0 e taits of Evaluation i s...in

,.,.....,,,,,..,,,,, e..n...

,,,...,........,..,,,..i na &c.d.

h'U

('c.)

'7/', - sy s!em is n ~n.

5=,

fis/e.- All 44 n~/ 0.s e rv Tee' *~~-t]*& ~~ 6.4 r~f

%ff'--.*

Q y

Jfpha.-. Je,p p

.J t 6 tL J *:- -

74 ~noL.'.r-c.M.? bbe s o / p-,./ }.+.G.e,.n :/ '7M. 5y' ee.

  1. " N '

E'

'y '

(c) gf

./'

Evaluation By G.2,dl a m-

. M ate 4 - s i a) 3.

E ivirentn'ntal imoact Evaluation

.............. yes O n Does this SOP:

(a) pc.sibly involve a significant envira mentalimpact?....

f

.............. yes O no 6,

  • (t.) have a significant adicts eff!!:t en th. avironment?....

/

  • (c) involve a significant s.,viron -.:e tw.. question not previously revie.ved and evaluated by the N.R.'C. l....,

............. yes O n d I

f Details of Evaluation t

Le h

C '*

\\

\\

v f

~

Evaluation By Date

' NOTE: 18 these ovcisoas.,e "ves". the cb.,1e must,.< eive N.R C..co o..a.

[

equ;,e.s e s n,s.:ur,co by ide s: i;on sup.,:nieneenitenii sup.,;niensei. ir e s,,,;

ri m.a..

4.

Review tecac eeve. o sa;uary 3 e

usi e niis {t two orr.,;ie., mtw,s.)

the PO R C 1.

Il I //

(

~

2.

Cf r S e MembeEj.

\\

PC A C Ch..,ma n S.s no t u, e 04 o

(

5.

Apcroval 9

/ Caesion'swcMiencent/Une S u pe, int ende nt

[ [ Cate

-... ~ ~.......,.

p

[n

- w ::

i. '. k....;. C..:...'. - ;:-.....:: n..

9m m

$n 2;5...-:::. ;_. o ;. ;,.::...... -.;;,:.

D

.:..y

~3 n

y

..x

\\ lfd 4 '.

. . "~

~~'.7

~

. ~ ' _ _.

.. f.w

~W L

r.

Y I

yp;,.. &

.,4 n-A - ~ < ~r~

m t._n.._~_ph f4,..

DN 97*

5 p' s......

1_

. _ _ _.._ =

7

.5 s._. _.._. _ %,

J

. _ _ ~. _ _.

...~.

..4

._. f. _.._

=.1

..9 fr

....-... g _. /_ _.- _. n..e.

S' se.;l

.p.

e

.e m....e-

-...e..--._.a

_-q

,e,,eg m gg m ep,,g gg y

,ee

.mg D**'

N A'-~~~-~~~~-~--~

-" - -- --~

u O.. W.

W.....

3 e

.e e..

.....s 4

.i.

e g

.e m,.,

I i

i l

l I

1

)

1

.. 9 - g ag

.u.

e g

1 d

..