ML19337A287

Urges ASLBP Not to Consider Applicant 800813 Appeal for Reconsideration of Jan 1981 Hearing Date.Applicant Is Trying to Harass Other Parties & Deny Due Process in Attempt to Rush Hearing

ML19337A287
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	08/28/1980
From:	Marrack D AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Lazo R Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8009090451
Download: ML19337A287 (1)

Text

' -

IU p

/( . . > . , . y,

$  % 420 i'ulberry Lane, 3ellaire, Texas 77401If if c t

%' . August 20, 1980 .d - 5198g ,

l]T

. .n.PJo f::re y /

Honorable Robert Lazo, Chariman a 1 h J h.;.5 .,

Atonic Safety n Licensing Board Fanel ,

dad fj' U.3. I:uclear Regulatory Commission

'#ashington, D.C. 20555 Re: In the ratter of Houston Iighting & Power Company (Allens Creek Huclear Generating Cta.: loa, Unit l')

Occket 1:o. 50-466

Dear i.r. Chairman:

At the properly called prehearing Conference on 33 Auglst 1980, attorney for the Applicant requested yaconsideration of the date set by the loard after hearinc submissions by all parties. The A?plicant had a full opportunity to present its' problens before the Board ruled, after it had duly considered all matters and set a dato for the second week of January 1981 for the Hearing to commence.

At that point, Applicant's attorney sought recensid-eration by the 20ard claiming unsubstantiated and "MA4ah' /4 unconfirmed " Difficulty to my Client" (p.1796 of transcript) .M+,

No evidence of y loss or other injury was presented and 2 no other reason for special reconsideraticn was declared.

In fact the Board Chairman had already reviewed the reasons parties would need the time to January 1981 to prepare for the Hearing and complete all the steps of due process.

In passing he ?.entioned that the Board had another committment in December 1980.

In attempting to rush the Hearing, the Applicant is trying to harass other parties and deny due process.

It should be noted that the Applicant has, of his own volition, delayed this project some three years after the 1975 IIearing by electing not to proceed directly at that time.

In the circumstances and for the above, and other

' reasons , it is respectfully urged that you not consider this appeal by the Applicant or deny the request for reconstituting the Board or otherwise altering the Eoard's considered opinion and ruline, re the : earing date.

fours sincerely, )

8009090 g f s rack, 1ntervenor IN