ML19336A537

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Licensee Response to IE Bulletin 80-11 Re Masonry Wall Design Which Discusses Criteria for Seismic Loads Re ASLB Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML19336A537
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 10/23/1980
From: Rachel Johnson
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To: Buck J, Johnson W, Rosenthal A
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
IEB-80-11, ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8010300027
Download: ML19336A537 (3)


Text

a s

M

__ m James W. Durham Portland General ElectricCompany Vice President and General Counse!

e Legal Department Senior Assistant General Counset Alvin Alexanderson October 23, 1980 Warren Hastings Assistant General Counse' Roland A. Johnson Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman Ronald W. Johnson Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Dallas A. Marckx U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Steven F. McCarre!

Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. W. Reed Johnson, Member Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Dr. John H. Buck, Member Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 In the Matter of Portland General Electric Company, et. al.

(Trojan Nuclear Plant)

Docket No. 50-344 (Control Building)

Gentlemen:

By their letter dated July 3, 1980, the NRC Staff requested Portland General Electric Company to supply information concerning masonry wall design in response to IE Bulletin 80-11.

By letter dated July 7, 1980, counsel for the NRC Staff, Mr. Gray, forwarded that letter to the Licensing Board in this proceeding, with copies to this Appeal Board and the parties for information. Enclosed for the information of the Appeal Board and the parties is Licensee's response to that request.

Since this enclosure documents clearly and in one place the design cri-teria for all masonry walls, it discusses criteria for seismic loads considered by the Licensing Board in their Initial Decision (see Initial Decision, pp. 17-32, 35-36). This response is consistent with Licensee's submittals and testimony on the record in the Control Building proceeding, and therefore does not have any material impact on the Licensing Board's Initial Decision.

Sincerely, h

r Ronald W. Johnso RWJ/mg/4sa4A3 Enclosure c: Control Building Service List 1300 Willamette Center 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Portland, Oregon 97204 h

8 0103 00 OQ (503)2203000

i O

4 A

g OCf %tf

-5 O

O

?

r UNITED SIATES OF AMERICA

(

A NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1

%g

/

S l "-'

BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD In the Matter of

)

)

Docket 50-344 PORT!.AND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,

)

et al

)

(Control Building Proceeding)

)

(Trojan Nuclear Plant)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 23, 1980 Licensee's letter to the Appeal Board dated October 23, 1980 with information related to the IE Bulletin 80-11 has been served upon the persons listed below by depositing copies thereof in the United States mail with proper postage affixed for first class mail.

Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom, Dean Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Division of Engineering, Board Architecture and Technology U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Oklahoma State University Washington, D. C.

20555 Stillwater,' Oklahoma 74074 Dr. John H. Buck, Member Dr. Hugh C. Paxton Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal 1229 - 41st Street Board Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Dr. W. Reed Johnson, Member U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Washington, D. C.

20555 Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Washington, D. C.

20555 Panel (5)

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marshall E. Miller, Esq., Chairman Washington, D. C.

20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Washington, D. C.

20555 l

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Docketing and Service Section (4)

Ms. Nina Bell Office of the Secretary 3926 N. E. 12th Avenue U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Portland, Oregon 97212 Washington, D. C.

20555 Mr. John A. Kullberg Joseph R. Gray, Esq.

15523 S. E. River Forest Drive Counsel for NRC Staff Portland, Oregon 97222 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 Mr. David B. McCoy 348 Hussey Lane Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad &

Grants Pass, Oregon 97526 Toll 1025 Connecticut Ave., N. W.

Ms. C. Gail Parson Suite 1214 P. O. Box 2992 Washington, D. C.

20036 Kodiak, Alaska 99615 Frank W. Ostrander, Jr., Esq.

Mr. Eugene Rosolie Assistant Attorney General Coalition for Safe Power State of Oregon 215 S. E. 9th Avenue Department of Justice Portland, Oregon 97214 500 Pacific Building 520 S. W. Yamhill Columbia County Courthouse Portland, Oregon 97204 Law Library Circuit Court Room William Kinsey, Esq.

St. Helens, Oregon 97051 Bonneville Power Administration P. O. Box 3621 Dr. Harold I. Laursen Portland, Oregon 97208 1520 N. W. 13th Corvallis, Oregon 97330 M k.

/:

AssistantGene[ralCounsel Ronald W.

hnson Portland General Electric Company Dated: October 23, 1980 4mg66.27B13

.~

l umans e

Portland General Electric Conviny Esyt D me s We h M" October 23, 1980 Trojan Nuclear Plant Docket 50-344 License NPF-1 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ATTN:

Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Dear Mr. Clark:

l Attached is Portland General Electric Company's response to your letter dated July 3,1980 in which you requested certain information related to IE Bulletin 80-11.

Attachment I hereto contains the evaluation criteria for single and double wythe and composite masonry walls for consideration of in plane and out-of plane loads. provides the requested description and justification of tornado loads for these walls.

Attach-ment 3 provides Licensee's basis for concluding that a long-term confirm-atory testing program is unnecessary at this time.

Specifically addressed in that attachment are the items which you suggested should be considered in such a test program.

Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this response.

Sincerely, Bart D. Withers Vice President Nuclear BDU/DJB/cig/4sa4A2 Attachments c.

Mr. R. H. Engelken, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:

ement

/ghh Inspection ANO sion No. of ages: [

N

-