ML19332F070
| ML19332F070 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/28/1989 |
| From: | Burdick T, Damon D, Hopkins J, Reidlinger T, Shepard D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19332F068 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-295-OL-89-03, 50-295-OL-89-3, NUDOCS 8912130355 | |
| Download: ML19332F070 (4) | |
Text
,"
..g a
li.
V.S. d'ICLt.AR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.g v
REGION III.
1!
j Reports No. 50-295/0L-89-03 Docket Nos. 50-295; 50-304 Licenses No. DPR-b; 3PR-48 3
Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company Post Office Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility _H ne: Zion Nuclear Generating Station-Examination Administered At: Zion Nuclear Generating Station /
Westinghouse Training Simulator Zion, IL Examinstion Conducted: -November 14 and 15, 1989 l
hn fil
//[B[J7 RIII Examiners:
D. Dadon I Date d
V llfAh5 T. Refdin er Date t
k A' h
l{,bihi J.Hopkins Date Chief. Examiner:
'/4
//flI[l7 D. Shbpard Date
. Approved By:
'/ JfD I N
N 8?
Thomas M. Burdick, Chief Date Operator L'.censino Section 2 Examiration Summary Examination administered on November 14 and 15, 1989 (Report No. 50-295/0L-89-03):
consisted of various E nations of written and operating requalification examinations to three reactor operaters and two senior reactor operators-,
Results: All operators passed the examination. The crew evaluated passed the simulator examination.
8912130355 891129g5 PDR ADOCK 0
g I
~
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Examiners
- D. Shepard.-NRC D. Damon, NRC T. Reidinger NRC J. Hopkins, NRC
- Chief Examiner l
2.
Examination Development The facility's proposed examination met the standards of NUREG-1021, ES-601.- All materials were used essentially as submitted.
a.
Written Examination l
The written examination required some minor revisions.
Approximately six questions were rejected by the NRC, but they were replaced by other facility supplied questions.
Some questions required minor editorial enhancements, b.
Dynamic Simulator Scenario l
The NRC, along v"h facility concurrence, added additional malfunctions to be able to objectively test for immediate action 1
completion. No major changes were made in the scenarios.
c.
Job Performance Measures (JPM)
The Job Performance Measures (JPM) were satisfactory for use. Some reassignment of critical steps were required. The facility should make JPM's either unit specific or common unit due to availability of control boards. The JPM questions were the weakest element of the development material. Many questions required revision prior to use or were rejected for use. Some questions were l ak-ups prior to rejection or revision. The final JPM questions met the requirements of NUREG-1021, ES-601.
3.
Examination Administration The overall evaluation of the operators and the crew was within the guidelines of the standard. The facility graded written examination scores were within 3% of the NRC scores. The JPM evaluations were within i
the standard's criteria between the facility and the NRC. The operating test (simulator) evaluation results were the same for the facility and the NRC.
1 l
2 4
t l
b 4.
Evaluation of Facility Evaluators (JPM)
' The facility evaluators performed, in general, per the criteria of HUREG-1021. ES-601. One concern of the NRC is that the facility must be more attuned to not giving inadvertent cues. These cues include talking to an NRC evaluator prior to giving unexpected cues, not repeating back all answers to questions but only incorrect answers, and the extra time 3
needed to give unexpected cues (cues when operator takes an unexpected route).
S..
Examination Results The operating crew passed the simulator examination. The NRC passed all 1
four individuals on the simulator examination. All three reactor o>erators passed the JPM operating test.
Both reactor operators passed f
t1e written examination.
The NRC informed the facility at the exit meeting that the two Senior Reactor Operators, and one Reactor Operator who required only the t
operating-test, could be again placed on shift per CAL RIII 80021. On i
November 17, 1989, the NRC informed the facility that the two Reactor Operators passed the written examination.
Since the two Reactor Operators also passed the operating test, the NRC told the facility on November 17 that the two Reactor Operators could go back on shift in accordance with CAL RIII LOO 21.
6.
Program Evaluation The Zion Requalification Program was not evaluated since less than 12 individuals were tested.
7.
Exit Meeting An exit meeting was conducted on November 15, 1989, between the facility and the NRC to summarize the above report. The following individuals were present at the exit meeting:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commonwealth Edison Company D. Shepard, Chief Examiner R. J. Budoube, Service Director T. Tongue, SRI (Braidwood)
H. Logaras, Operator Training D. G. Selph, PTC Senior Instructor A. J. Ockert, Training Supervisor P. LeBlond, Assistant Superintendent, Operations R. Thornton, Zion Training l
L i
3 1
$:.. ej m-
,A Requalification Procram Evaluation Report L
Facility: ~ Zion Nuclear Generating Station - Unit 1 l
Examiners:
D. Ehepard, Chief Examiner D. Damon.
L T. Reidinger J. Hopkins r
Dates of Evaluation: November 14 and 15, 1989 i
L Areas Evaluated:
X Written-X Ora 1(JPN)
X' Simulator i
Examination'Results:
i R0-SRO Total Evaluation Pass / Fail Pass / Fail Pass / Fail (S. M, or U) o
~
Written Examination 2/0 0/0 2/0 N/A l
Operating Examination Ora 1(JPM) 3/0 0/0 3/0 N/A Simulator 2/0 2/0 4/0 N/A
- ~ valuation of facility written examination grading:
S t
Crew Examination Results:
Crew 1 Pass / Fail Operating Examination Pass Overall Program Evaluation The program was not evaluated since less than 12 individuals were evaluated.
All the co-evaluations with the facility were satisfactory within the guidelines of NUREG-1021, ES-601.
Submitted:
Forwarded-Approved:
'/N b
Y Al D. Shepard I. Burdick G. Wright
/
l L
Chief Examiner Section Chief Branch Chief l
4
.