ML19332D865
| ML19332D865 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 11/24/1989 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19332B581 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8912050359 | |
| Download: ML19332D865 (2) | |
Text
R
- .t ' l.:
c,..
1 ENCLOSUREE
-f.
LASALLE. COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 & 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-373 8.50-374 GENERIC LETTER 83 28,. ITEM 2.2.1 i
EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM FOR ALL. SAFETY.RELATED COMP 0NENTS n
1.0 _ INTRODUCTION' Generic Letter 83-28 was issued by the liRC on July 8,1983 to indicate actions to be taken by licensees and applicants based on the generic implications of the Salem ATWS events.
Item 2.2.1 of that letter states that licensees and l
epplicnts shall describe'in consioerable c'etail their program for classifying
. all safety-related components other than RTS components as safety-related on plant documents.and in information handling systems that are used to control plant activities that may affect these components. Specifically, the licensee / applicant's submittal was required to contain information describing
(-1)' the criteria used to identify these components as safety-related; (2) the
'information handling system which identifies the components as safety-reldted;
'(3) the manner in which station personnel use this information handling system
.l to control activities affecting these components;-(4) management controls that are used to verify that the information handling system is prepared,-
maintained, v411 doted, and useo in occordance with dpproved procedures; and
-I
-(5). design verification and qualification testing requirements that are part of' the specifications' for procurement of safety-related components.
The licensee for LaSalle, Units 1 & 2 submitted responses to Generic 1
Letter 83-28. Item 2.2.1 in submittals dated-November 5,1983, February 29, i
1984, and August 9, 1989. We have evaluated these responses anc find them to be acceptable.
2.0 DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION Commonwealth Edison Company, the licensee for LoSalle County Station, Units 1 &
2 provided submittals that describe programs to assure that all components
'necessary for accomplishing the required safety-related functions are properly designated on plant documents, procedures, and in the information handling systems that are used to control plant activities that may affect these components.
8912050359 891124
.PDR ADOCK 05000373 P
i
\\
s a
A description of the criteria used for classifying componeats and equipment as safety-related and s description of the preparation, maintenance, control and use of the information handling system, which contains the classification information, was also provided.
In addition, management controls used by the licensee assure that the information handling system will be consistent, adequately prepared and maintained, and will be used as intended.
Furthermore, the licensee requires that appropriate design verification and qualification is specified for the procurement of all safety-related components and parts.
Detailed evaluation of this item is docunented in the INEL report, Udy A.C.,
"Conformance to Generic Letter 83.28, item 2.2.1 -- Equipment 4
Classification for all Other Safety-Related Components: LaSalle 1/2,"
EGG-NTA-7267, September 1989.
3.0 CONCLUSION
The staff and our contractor have reviewed the licensce's responses to Generic Letter 83-28 Item 2.2.1 regarding the equipment classification program for safety-related components and conclude that they are acceptable.
4 i
-4
-