ML19332C481
| ML19332C481 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 11/15/1989 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19332C477 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-89-32, NUDOCS 8911280179 | |
| Download: ML19332C481 (1) | |
Text
y n
y w
m t
w 3
APPENDIX A x
- Louisiana Power & Light Company Docket:
50-382
-Waterford Steam Electric Station,.
Operating License: NPF-38 *
. Unit 3 a
During;an NR'C inspection conducted on October 16-20, 1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involvedithe failure of inservice inspection'(ISI) examinations.to comply with procedure and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers ~(ASME) Code, requirements..In accordance with the r
" General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC: Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2 Appendix C-(1989) (Enforcement Policy), the violation is listed below:
Failure'of'ISI: Examinations To Comply With Procedure and Code Requirements Criterion-V-ofJAppendix:B to 10 CFR Part 50 and the licensee's approved quality assurance program description require that activities affecting quality shall be accomplished in accordance' with documented procedures.
Paragraph 6.42in Procedure WTR-ISI-70, and Article T-761 in Section-V of 3
.the ASME Cooe', require that magnetic particle:exeminations be conducted in-at least two directions.
Contrary to:the above. the NRC inspector found that the 18 reactor vessel nuts examined during the last outage on May 2, 1988, were examined in one direction only.
This is a Severity Level IV violation.
(SupplementI)(382/8932-01)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Louisiana Power & Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office, within 30 days-of the.date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written. statement or explanation in reply, including for each. violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted.
(2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, l '
(3) the corrective steps:which'will be taken to avoid further violations, and i
(4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.- 'Where good cause is shown, 4
L consideration will be given to extending the response time.
~
Dated at A lington, Texas, this /
day of 1989 t
8911280179 891113 l
PDR ADOCK 050003S2
~
i o
PDC i
,