ML19332B876
| ML19332B876 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1989 |
| From: | Miltenberger S Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NLR-N89228, NUDOCS 8911210207 | |
| Download: ML19332B876 (4) | |
Text
o e
e Pubisc Service Doctric and Gas Company Steven E. Mittenberger Pubke Service E'octric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038 609-339-4199 Vic; Prewdent and Chet 14uckrar Offecm -
November 9, 1989 NLR-H89228 i
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk
-Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATION AND BWR POWER OSCILLATION INSPECTION, REPORT No.- 50-354/89-12 (OL)
REPORT RESPONSE 30PE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCEST NO. 50-554-1 Publ.tc Serv: tee Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) hereby submits its-respense to the above referenced report.
The specific responses to the two items requested are include:i in the attachment.
All actions will be completed prior to the adhiiniseration of _ the J 990 requalificaLion examinations.
y-Should you have any questions concerning this response, please contact us.
Sincerely, f h h ic fo<s h P wx Attachment b
o mm.,,.
PDR-ADOCK~05000354 a
puu
g.,
s
,-f{ t u.r g;
, f *,
. Document Control' Desk 2--
- 11/9/89
,b NLR-N89228
+
x; ;,
j
,g--
i o,
Licensing-Project Manager - Hope Creek
. i C2:-Mr.~C. Y.LShiraki c
e ed Mr. : D.c K. Allsopp I
' ResidentLInspector'-l Hope Creek.
~
.h.
Mr.< William T. Russell, Administrator f
Region I-
- Mr. Kent Tosch, Chief Ti M.
- New' Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
- i
' Division of Environmental Quality
{
. c.
Bureau-of_ Nuclear Engineering j
CN 415-Trenton, -, NJ - 08625-1
$Ql1 '
@%;;v;i;:
J "f 1((
r r ;;jy
?._
'4 "
.h ll/
h
- ljo,,'
{, f ; ++ ' y! '..
-.f.'
fl'-
Ji':R
}
j n
E k
V I
i 1
- n.
e e
i 4
r l
1 -
a
-+r-m m
1
e--4 Y
t w-Ttv w
. - =sw 4
=#-5
H o
7 i
ATTACHMENT
-REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATION AND'BWR POWER ~ OSCILLATION INSPECTION. REPORT NO. 50-354/80-12 (OL) b This attachment responds-to your request for a written reply to-I discuss actions planned or taken to address weaknesses identified by your letter which transmitted the subject evaluation report.
l Specifically' requested by your letter were actions pertaining to Ew
- 1). examination preparation; and 2) examination grading and analysis.
In attempting-to address the cause of the weakness in quality control identified'for the examination process, the lack of a i
well-defined process to implement the requirement of Operator Licensina Examiner Standard, section ES 601 is apparent, m,
By prov'iding procedural. guidance and checklists fOr use by I
personnel developing, reviting or valiUating license operator requalification examination saterials, coe4 mission of attention to t
,N
~ detail ~errorn, ca.noted throughout the report, will be reduced.
Jritten' guidance ot-this type ',.111 ascist in reducing errore during~1) initial examination preparation; and 2) 6uring the y
gradinafand~aan),yria of the requalification examination.
' ITEM 1:
ACTIONS BCIMG TAKEN TO ENSURE QUtdITY CONTROh FOR t
LICENDED. OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION ZXAMINATION i
' PREPARATION Written guidance is being prepared on requalification examination preparation which specifies:
how to prepare a sample plan and its use in conjunction with the K/A catalog to prepare a test outline to ensure test validity.
the relationship between the test outline and the test items.
detailed guidance on how to prepare good test i
questions for short answer, completion, multiple choice, and matching items.
the use of checklists by examination writers for each examination to ensure all requirements are completed.
+
.r format for open reference questions an.' JPMs which requires items to be cross-referenced to AfA numbers and ratings, task number, lesson plan (as applicable), objective number (as applicable), and plant references.
examination assembly requirements.
how to prepare and evaluate static and dynamic simulator scenarios.
ITEM 2 ACTIONS BEING TAKEN TO ENSURE QUALITY CONTROL FOR LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION EXAMINATION GRADING AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS t
Written guidance is being prepared on requalification examination grading and analysis of results which specifies:
the licensed operator requalification examination grading process.
sn independent check o[ lis insed opertator requalifjcation examination grading.
an analyelo of Ideensed operatcer requalification examination results.
ircorporation of analysis results into axamination and training program.
inclusion of an overall dynamic simulator evalua-
- tion, i
k