ML19332B626

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Written Response to Listed Questions Re Agreement Between Lilco & State of Ny to Close & Decommission Plant
ML19332B626
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 10/27/1989
From: Udall M
HOUSE OF REP., INTERIOR & INSULAR AFFAIRS
To: Carr K
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19327B830 List:
References
NUDOCS 8911140021
Download: ML19332B626 (2)


Text

w -

19C Yr PfW 13: 43'

-FROM._

g IL NTER10R COMMIT 1EE 2 PAGE.002-e,

+,.

m m,,,,,,,,

MonRIS K. UDALL. AAMONA, CHAIRMAN

-i

^

an"a
s %".,

.M

=r.rt== =A _

.="-

COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR "g m h"]"*h[:'" [h AND INSULAR AFFAIRS

'T.,." g g an '

= =

)g" h" M' 7,,,fm*"',.*g U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

' M" C M *"'

7,3,","T,,",, ",","",,,

WASHINGTON DC 20816 gg,,,tya,

  • N. T NEn"="=* '"w co w w.couwest

. = _. E. g, ""*' - --.vou =

N A8"'m" ** * '

c====a 1"cu="'n'"am"'a.a.= cmou

  • '.L**.as.'"

,.".c"e M. E *" " "*

'"ller:=:l Rom"'"

October 27, 1989 The Honorable Kenneth M. Carr Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Chairman:

On November 9, 1989, the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment will conduct an oversight hearing.concerning the

-agreement between the Long Island Lighting company-and the State of New York to close and decommission the Shoreham nuclear power plant.

Instead of requesting the commission to. testify at the

~

hearing, I would appreciate the Commission providing written responses to the following questions by November 7, 1989:

(1). Does the NRC support the "Ritter Amendment" to the NRC authorization bill adopted by-the Energy and Commerce Committee on July 6, 19897 (2)

Does the NRC support legislation concerning plant-specific NRC licensing actions?

If so, under what L

circumstances would NRC-support legislation that would result in termination or denial of a plant license?

l (3)

Does the NRC have the authority to compel a licensee to I

generate electricity from a commercial nuclear facility if I

the licensee does not desire to generate electricity from the facility?

(4)

Does the NRC have the authority to compel a licensee to complete construction of a nuclear facility that is not complete?

l (5)

If a licensee determines that a nuclear facility should be closed and decommissioned, does the NRC have the authority to compel that licensee to continue to operate the i

facility because the NRC determines that the power generated by the facility is needed?

)

l l,.

7ohdslo DENCE IP O

. s v wu i i e t :.

PAGE.003

.. (. ;~

i

~

-Hon. Kenneth M.

Carr i.

October 27, 1989.

Page Two Your cooperation in providing the Subcommittee with a written response to these questions by the requested date is urgently requested.

1 Sincerely, 4

Norris K.

Udall'

)

Chairman-A

{

l.;

l 1

l~

l

-