ML19332A773

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Commission 800319 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re SECY-80-139 Dealing W/Nrc Enforcement Program.Revised Policy Discussed But No Final Conclusions Reached
ML19332A773
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/28/1980
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML19332A770 List:
References
REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-80-139A, NUDOCS 8009180284
Download: ML19332A773 (1)


Text

.+#

'o, UNITED STATES Dornell m

i )3'"

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Rehm

$I E W ASHIN GTON. D.C.20555 Minogue y, 4 nm%f!

Shapar

' '+2 M/

March 28,11980 Denton l

Haller OFFI:';E OF THE NM35 SECRETAM Moseley MEMORANDUM FOR:

William J. Dircks,. Acting Arndt FROM:

Samuel J. Chilk, Secretad

}

s STAFFREQUIREMENTS-DISCpSLI )N OF SECY-80-139 - NRC

SUBJECT:

ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM, '2:05 P.b., WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 19BO,'C0".MISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, D. C. OFFICE The Comission discussed ~a proposed revised NRC enforcement policy, but reached no final conclusions. It was agreed that detailed individual Comissioner comments would be provided directly to the staff and that a further Commission meeting on this subject would be necessaryf Tha Comis. don also requested that the ED0' insure the following:

1 clarification.regarding the circumstances under which technical discretion. in_ applying the enforcement policy, referenced in the footnote on phge 4 of the General Statement of Enforcement Authority.

ought to be utilized by the staff; and the factors on which such staff

~

judgments wil'1 be basec; 2.

infomation regarding the practice of other agencies with respect

.to imposition of civil, penalties on the individual licensed operator as well as the corporate licensee; 3.

information o'n the practice of ot'her agencies in distinguishing

~

certain' classes of licensees, such as non-profit organizations, from other licensees in the level of civil penalties imposed for similar infractions of regulations; 4.

further consideration of the following items:

the question of the proper role of criminal penalties in a.

the enforcement program; b.

the role of Bulletins,-licensee comitments and other informal documents in the enforcement program;,

c.

inclusion of violations of environmental requirements in the highest levels of the violation severity categories for j

civil penalties; d.

differentiation within the civil penalty structure cf willful or negligent violations; de-emphasizing the consequences of a violation as the e.

basis for detemining the extent of the civil penalty to be' imposed so that a licensee whose facility was not c.perating at the time a violation was comitted would not be penalized less than another licensee committing the.same violation during the time his facility is operating.

(SECY Suspense for all items: Two Weeks after receipt of Commissioner coments).

,0 m y0 D ~3'Y a

6 cc:

g Comissioners Comission Staff Offices AJ 6009180284