ML19331C672
| ML19331C672 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/28/1980 |
| From: | Deardorff A, Gerber D, Martin J NUTECH ENGINEERS, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19331C671 | List: |
| References | |
| 64.802.0010, COM-0709-01, COM-0709-01-R1, COM-709-1, COM-709-1-R1, NUDOCS 8008190333 | |
| Download: ML19331C672 (36) | |
Text
,
g-ID 01 NF0mVKTON ON _Y COM-0709-01 Controlled Copy No.
REVISION 1 i
64.802.0010 1
EVALUATION OF 42-INCH CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES FOR ZION STATION, UNITS 1 & 2 l
0 Prepared for:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY E
Prepared by:
NUTECH E
t 1
MdA6 asA s. Desda D. A. Gerber, P.E.
J[BIMa[ tin,P.E.
Project Engineer Project Manager j
7 l} /Y D
/
Date:
7/26/8C A.'F.DeaIdorff,P i
Engineering Mana lIl N
N
" " * " " "3
REVISION CONTROL SHEET
SUBJECT:
EVALUATION OF 42 INO1 CONTAINMENT REPORT NUMBER:
COM-0709-01 ISOLATION VALVES FOR ZION STATION, UNITS 1 6 2 D.A.
Gerber.P.E.. Senior Engineer M
NAME/ TITLE INITIAL b
T.
Lem, Analyst 7~< 4,
NAME/ TITLE INITIAL 1
A. Fife,P.E., Staff Engineer NAME/ TITLE INITIAL l
NAME/ TITLE INITIAL
)
NA.AE/ TITLE INITIAL PRE-ACCURACY CRITERIA hh'
~
PRE-ACCURACY CRITERIA PAGE(S REV PARED OECK OIECK PAGE(S)
REV PARED CHECK OECK ti 1
- DAC, f s.
jyf 7
11-iv 0
TL
)t01 iv 1
D%
ft-lf
/pI
]; 1.1-1.1 1
D%
fi-
//3I F
1.2 0
'D66 7L
((p 2.1 1
D%
72-3.2 1
fk
}fh 2
0
'D44 TL
}lsf
/[N 3.1-3.4 1
IA4 re, 3.10 0
TL
[
3.8 1
IWW IA l[p 4.2 0
M6 8-
//3I 6.1 1
- 4 N
l[
l 5.1 0
W T4 g//
H H:
6.1 0
Z44 TL pf P
ff7)/
\\ p.A 0
QLP 001.1r0L, i
- As shown on individual page.
nutech y
_:a e
s I
l s
ABSTRACT A stress analysis was performed by NUTECH to evaluate j
stress level margins in critical components of the 42-inch butterfly valves manufactured by the Henry Pratt Company and used as containment purge isolation valves at Zion Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 & 2.
The purpose of this evaluation was to determine the worst l
case stress level margins existing in the critical load-carrying structural members of the valve during a closing event under design basis Loss of Coolant Accident conditions.
I The evaluation consisted of an analysis of stresses in the l
valse shaft, pins, key and actuator arm.
This analysis was performed using, as the loading condition, valve shaft torque values calculated from values in the Henry Pratt Company report, Reference 1.
The results of the stress analysis indicate that the worst case stress level margins
)
in the valve load-carrying structural members are acceptable.
It is concluded from this analysis effort that the critical internal components of the Pratt 42-inch butterfly valve
]
will retain structural integrity if subjected to the flow induced loads resulting from a postulated design basis Loss of Cootant Accident when used as a containment purge isolation valve at Zion Station, Units 1 & 2.
COM-0709-01 11 nLitech j
T TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 11 LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 2.0 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 3.0 STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN CRITERIA, LOADING CONDITIONS AND ANALYTICAL METHODS 3.1 3.1 DESIGN CRITERIA 3.1 h
3.2 LOADING CONDITIONS 3.1 3.3
/NALYTICAL METHODS
'3. 3 4.0 RESULTS 4.1
5.0 CONCLUSION
S 5.1
6.0 REFERENCES
6.1 APPENDIX A - NUTECH Stress Analysis of 42-Inch Butterfly F1 ho 64.8$2 0006 a
3
- 1 COM-0709-01 til nutech A
T LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 3-1 HENRY PRATT COMPANY TORQUE VS. VALVE DISC ANGLE 3.7 RESULTS 4-1
SUMMARY
OF STRESS RESULTS 4.2 DI LIST OF FIGURES El rig m m ie Page 4
2-1 SRETce ez ee1TeR,Lx AL e 2.2 l
'3-1 CONTAINMENT PRESSURE VS. TIME 3.8 3-2 TORQUE VS. VALVE DISC ANGLE 3.9 l
3-3 AVAILABLE TORQUE IN SYSTEM 3.10 l
l l
COM-0709-01 iv l
Revision 1 nutech 03 1
g.
/3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
I In References 2, 3 and 4, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested Commonwealth Edison Company to respond to generic c(
concerns regarding containment purging during normal plant operation and provided guidelines for operability of 6
containment isolation valves used for purging.
These operability guidelines included:
l 1.
Demonstrating that the containment isolation valve I
actuators have sufficient tcrque capability to stroke the valves from full open to full closed within the technical specification time limit against design basis Loss of Coolant Accident containment pressure.
2.
Ensuring that the valve structural elements have sufficient stress margins to withstand the concomi-I 1
tant loads imposed while closing.
}
1 h
The. containment purge isolation valves at Zion Station, Units 1 & 2, are butterfly valves manufactured by the Henry 1
Based on the hydrodynamic torque results in Pratt Company.
Reference 1, it is apparent that these butterfly valves l
tend to close under the postulated flow conditions.
In order to address the second operability guideline, an analysis effort was conducted to evaluate the stress COM-0709-01 1.1 Revision 1 nutech g
3 margins inherent in the valves under the postulated flow conditions.
Analysis of the critical load-carrying components of the valve was performed utilizing as input the maximum torque values from the Reference 1 Henry Pratt Company report adjusted for postulated containment pressure.
The analysis was comprised of a simplified stress analysis considering bending, shaar and torsional shear loadings.
Stress margins were calculated for the
)
load bearing components utilizing standard stress allowables.
EI This report, prepared for Commonwealth Edison Company, presents the results of the stress analysis performed on
]
the Zion Station, Units 1 & 2, 42-inch containment isola-tion valves and provides verification of acceptable stress level margins in their critical internal structural components under a postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident.
The report summarizes the stress analysis design criteria, loading conditions, methods and results.
l APPENDIX A is the NUTECH stress and hydrodynamic torque analysis.
1 0
01 13 COM-0709-01 1.2 g
nutech L
3 2.0 COMPONENT DESCRIPTION The valves used at Zion Station, Units 1 & 2, for contain-cent purging are 42-inch offset asymmetric disc butterfly valves with external pneumatic / spring (air to open/ spring to close) valve actuators (shown on Figure 2-1).
These Pratt 42-inch valves are constructed with a carbon steel body, a 4-1/4 inch diameter type 3'04 stainless steel shaft 7
and sintered bronze bearings.
The valve is mounted in
]
horizontal runs of pipe with the shaft vertically oriented.
The actuators are aligned horizontally and are attached to the valve shaft through a lever arm which is 7
keyed to the shaft with a cold drawn steel key.
The valve mJ disc is attached to the valve shaft with two 1-1/2 inch tapered stainless steel pins.
')
Each plant uses two of these valves in series in the
~
containment purge line.
Of each pair, one valve is located inside containment and the other one is located outside containment.
They serve the function of containment j
isolation valves.
In the postulated event that these valves are open for purging and a design basis Loss of Coolant Accident occurs, these valves must be capable of closing within the technical specification time limits and h
provide containment integrity.
I l P COM-0709-01 2.1 nutech g
'e 4
F 1
AIR CYLINDER b
I\\
(
'l
')
I s
>u
'-~~
---~m 0
w\\b a
P kh C
VALVE DISC w
3 l3 1$
l3 0
1)
SKETCil 0F BUTTERFLY VALVE FIGURE 2-1 j
D MllIOCb COM-0709-01 2.2 3
l l
T 3.0 STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN CRITERION, LOADING CONDITION AND ANALYTICAL METHODS The stress analysis of the valve is presented in APPENDIX A.
The design criterion, loadings and analytical methods used are presented below.
3.1 Design Criteria The purpose of the analysis was to analytically determine that the stress levels in the valve load-I carrying structural members were within limits that l
would preclude yielding for those members as the valve is closed against a flow rate generated by a postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident.
This criterion would ensure that during closing, the active valve parts would not deform.
3.2 Loading condition The loading condition considered in the stress
]
analysis of the butterfly valve included hydrodynamic torque and valve actuator restraining force.
Dead weight and seismic forces were considered to be negligible.
]
Torque loading of the valve shaft was based on the torque values provided by the Henry Pratt Company in Reference 1, as reproduced in Table 3-1.
These COM-0709-01 3.1 nutech 3
I torque values were proportionally adjusted for containment pressure, as described in the.following paragraph.
The Reference 1 hydrodynamic torque values were calculated using a containment pressure of 42.7 psia, the maximum postulated containment pressure at the end of the valve closing stroke.
To be more realistic, the Zion Station containment pressure-time curve (Reference 5) was used to determine containment pressure versus valve disc angle during the val.ve stroke (The containment pressure-time characteristics are shown in Figure 3-1.). This method yields the relationship between hydrodynamic torque and valve disc angle represented on Figure 3-2.
Figure 3-2 was determined by scaling torque values from the Reference 1 values on the basis of containment pressure and Mach number as follows:
3 Torque = C py 9 (Reference 6)
T with CT = Torque coefficient p
= Density of air V
= Velocity of air at minimum area in valve COM-0709-01 3.2 kevision 1 l
a
I D
= Diameter of valve opening
]
4 Assuming, that air is a perfect gas gives:
Torque = C (M
)D3=C PM YD,
2 3
T T
)
Ratio of specific heats Y
=
P Containment pressure
=
Universal gas constant R
=
T Air temperature
=
M
_.. number Ratioing the Reference 1 torque values (subscript P) to the actual torque values (subscript a) yields:
3 2
(Torque)p (C
YD)p (pg )p T
3 2
U #9"*)a (C
YD),
(PM )a T
31nce CT, Y and D are constant for this comparison:
2 l
(PM )
l (Torque)a =
x (Torque)p 2
(PM )p l
For the maximum hydrodynamic torque case, at a valve
(
disc angle of 15 from full open, the postulated containment pressure is 28.8 psia, which yields a 1
l Mach number of 1.0 at the valve disc edge.
There-l fore, the maximum hydrodynamic torque is determined 1
]
as follows:
)
COM-0709-01 3.3
I Pp = 42.7 psia P
= 28.8 psia a
Hp =
1.0 H,= 1.0 (Torque)p = 166,710 inch-pounds (Reference 1) 2 28.8 x 1.0 ) (166,170) = 112,077 in pounds.
(Torque)a= ((42.7 x 1.0 )
2 (tending to close valve)
. Conservatism was introduced by analyzing the upstream valve for flow forces while assuming the downstream valve and piping were not connected.
7 Valve actuator force wg, conservatively calculated
]
based on the assumption that the valve actuator torque balanced the flow induced hydrodynamic torque generated in the valve at each valve disc angle.
The valve actuator is comprised of an air cylinder / spring 3
I combination.
The spring is attached to a piston inside the air cylinder and forces the valve closed l
when there is no air in the cylinder.
To open the valve, the cylinder is pressurized with air such that the air pressure on the piston overcomes the spring 1
force.
Upon a containment isolation signal, the air l]
in the cylinder is bled out through an orifice thus P.
permitting the spring to gradually close the valve.
If the flow induced hydrodynamic torque is positive C0H-0709-01 3.4 Rcrision 1 nutech g
l
7-4 this closing torque.
If the flow induced hydro-dynamic torque is negative (to open the valve), the effect is to compress the spring.
The lower curve in
]
Figure 3-3 represents the torque available from the spring force which can resist this opening torque.
Since the upper and lower curves envelope the calculated hydrodynamic torque, during a postulated 7
design basis Loss of Coolant Accident, the valve will
]
close at the normal operating rate governed by the initial air pressure, orifice size and spring constant.
3 3.3 Analytical Methods
]
The butterfly valve was analyzed to determine the stress level margins in the valve load-carrying active components during the postulated flow condition.
I The analysis consisted of determination of bending, torsion and shear loads on the valve shaft, key, pins and ectuator arm at the critical valve disc angle of 15 from full open.
Bending and torsional moments J
l and shear forces were calculated at the actuator arm attachment, upper and lower bearings and the pins.
a COM-0709-01 3.5 g
nutech I
.u l
n-I The maximum shear stress due to combined bending, torsion and shear was then calculated and compared either to an allowable of 1/2 yield strength, or to a value developed from the maximum. distortion energy theory (Reference 7), to generate safety factor values.
T i
a D
B C
a d
u O
COM-0709-01 3.6 nutech J
l
I TABLE 3-1 HENRY PRATT COMPANY TORQUE VS. VALVE DISC ANGLE RESULTS VALVE DISC ANGLE DYNAMIC TORQUE (Degrees from full open)
(inch-pounds closing valve) 0 82,968 5
124,156
]
10 148,095 15 166,170 20 148,392 25
-134,665 30 125,752
]
35 111,806 40 98,875 45 81,055 50 62,171 44,218 55 60 28,230 65 16,611 i
70 11,147 75 5,638 q
LA 80 3,347 l]
85 1,181 l
90
- 42,025 d
nutech
]
COM-0709-01 3.7 I
IT TABLE 3-1 HENRY PRATT COMPANY TORQUE VS. VALVE DISC ANGLE RESULTS VALVE DISC ~ ANGLE DYNAMIC TORQUE (Degrees from full open)
(inch-;iounds closing valve) 0 82,968 5
124,156 10 148,095 15 166,170 20 148,392 25 134,665 30 125,752 35 111,806 40 98,875 45 81,055 50 62,171 55 44,218 60 28,230 65 16,611 70 11,147 75 5,638 80 3,347 l
85 1,181 90 42,025 y
's.
h COM-0709-01 3.7 l
T 1
1 50 4
- -. _ + -._. _ _-.. __. j __ __.
4._
. a.
...,. _..p
_ __J._j. _. _ __.q _..
.j....
'i j
...___4.._._.d.__ _
.j
. y._
_ _ __ j.. _
. _ y %{ -.
i i
....} -
i q,
4._.._j_
_.t _ _,_.. _
1 m
4 s _..
_4.. _ _ _
._ J._ _p.
-~
m
,~
. - _. _. 4 __. t _
_._.._ g _. __ _4 - -
m i
v i
i 1
e g
] - __ _ _1_. _ _ _ _ _.
__ _ 4__.
....1.._... 4 _
i
.. -q.-
-A_
.1_.
_..... i u.'
e 30
.__.1._ _'_
o
... _/. _ _
m m
m i
e
[..
i i
a 1,.
~
p
- +-t--
m 20
. _ ___4 ___.... _._. _,l. _
.,.)
-4 i
z f_
r Z
-_, _r.
_4.
7
.. _ _..__.j._._..
._.g_
x
-- g _--,
_.__ L _.._ _,..
~
l _ _-..-
l m-a
~
f
- i E
z
, j_..
o
. _ _ - - __ I_ _...
__p..
i y
. -a---
..y
. _ _ 9._... _.9. _.
_ _ _ _,. _.._4_ j._.
.. } _..
_.p q..
__q.__
i
.3...
- _ _1
...}..__
u,.......
.. J....
. _. _.3...
I..
f
._ i 4_
....i...
__j -...
_ _.. p _.
9...
.p.
,.-.a
- j.
..l.
.l...
, d..
.j.
,j, 8
-h__._.)_
1.0 10 100 TIME (seconds)
, CONTAINMENT PRESSURE VS. TIME t'
FIGURE 3-1 COM-0709-G1 3.8 Revision 1 nutech l
i l
u 120,000-U l00,000-l lN e0,000-l E
N 60,00o-1 1
o F
40,000-U l
3 l
20,000-3 lN o
10 20 30 40 50 so 70 80
]
VALVE DISC ANGLE (DEGREES FROM FULL OPEN) l l
IlYDR0 DYNAMIC TORQUE VS. VALVE DISC ANGLE FIGURE 3-2 l
COM-0709-01 39 l
nutech d
3 3
r-m uj 500,000-3 400,000-AVAILABLE AIR CYLINDER
.RE STR AI N I N G TORQUE -
Ts
]
[
200,000-8 x
100,000-(3 0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 l
VALVE DISC ANGLE (DEGREES FROM FULL OPEN )
-100,000-TORQUE AVAILABLE TO '
CLOSE VALVE FROM SPRING l
(ZERO PRESSURE IN CYLINDER)
M,1 AVAILABLE TORQUE IN SYSTEM FIGURE 3-3 l'
COM-0709-01 3.10 nutech Revision 1 l
7 4.0 STRESS ANALYSIS RESULTS The stress and safety factor values from the stress analysis, Appendix A, are presented in Table 4-1.
The
)
critical location in the valve was determined to be the shaft at the upper valve disc-to-shaft pin, where the stress level was conservatively calculated to be 977. of the 7
allowable.
-4 7
7 7
'T ig 7
og 7
4 3
COM-0709-01 4.1 3
nutech t
}'
N 5
TABLE 4-1
SUMMARY
OF STRESS RESULTS 3
STRESS PERCENTAGE OF ALLOWABLE (ksi)
SHAFT:
]
SHEAR STRESS AT KEY 7.63 51%
SHEAR STRESS AT UPPER BEARING 12.47 83%
97%*
SHEAR STRESS AT PINS 16'.79 KEY:
SHEAR STRESS 9.37 62%
h COMPRESSIVE STRESS 14.99 50%
PINS:
SHEAR STRESS 7.13 48%
I ACTUATOR ARM:
l BENDING STRESS 5.25 18%
0
]
- BASED ON MAXIMUM DISTORTION ENERGY THEORY SHEAR STRESS l
ALLOWABLE OF 17.31 KSI.
l COM-0709-01 4.2 nutech g
l 3-1
]
5.0 CONCLUSION
S The stress analysis of the Pratt 42-inch butterfly valve demonstrates that the loads and stresses imposed upon the active load-carrying components during a valve closure L
under a postulated design basis Loss of Coolant Accident
]
event are within acceptable limits.
The stress margins are sufficient to ensure no significant deformation of the rr active valve parts will occur when the valve is used as a containment isolation valve in the Zion Station, Units 1 and 2.
The loads used in the stress analysis were based f
upon results from the Henry Pratt Company.
]
]
7 7
lO A
tl ru O
I COM-0709-01 5.1 L*
nutech d4 l
7, :....
r
6.0 REFERENCES
P il 1.
J. E. Sirovatka (Henry Pratt Company) letter to Commonwealth Edison Company, " Commonwealth Edison, Zion Nuclear Plant, P. O. 241329, HPCo Ref. D-28504",
7 dated April 18, 1980.
a 2.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter from Mr. A.
.]*
Schwencer to Mr. Cordell Reed (Commonwealth Edison Company) " Containment Purging During Normal Plant Operation", dated November 29, 1978.
3.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter from Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut to All Light Water Reactors, " Containment Purging and Venting During Normal Operation -
3lE Guidelines for Valve Operability" dated September 27, 1979.
4.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission letter from Mr. A.
]
Schwencer to Mr. D. Louis Peoples (Commonwealth Edison Company), " Containment Purging and Venting During Normal Operation", dated October 23, 1979.
]
5.
" Figure 14.3.4-6, Pressure-Temperature Curve, Zion Nuclear Power Station, Final Safety Analysis Report".
6 6.
T. Sarpkaya, " Torque and Cavitation Characteristics of Butterfly Valves," Journal of Applied Mechanics,
]
Transactions of the ASME, Number 60-WA-105, December 1961, pp. 511 - 518.
7.
Robert C. Juvinall, Engineering Considerations of Stress, Strain and Strength, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 19 Edition pp. 65-69.
D 3
Al N
y COM-0709-01 6.1 Revision 1 mi i
"]
- j G
3
]
]
]
APPENDIX A
]
N' TECH Stress Analysi.s of 42-Inch Butterfly Valve
~3 m
in G
lO 1
P b
O O
COM-0709-01 pggggl3
~
nutech San Josa. Czlifornia
[ /$g ISilCIfJr EOwer bl3tiOG File No. f Y. lod.ON '
pg g t
Oaner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edison Company
<-fare < Aes Vsic o J" PkAT7 M7' 8vrrrast y
'/p t y s-
--x-A CA OS d r/ yn t yr sparf
/s 7Xr Mnp4au A)popyysM1 7bngus d 7;,) rrsisid6 To deDr& 74e VA s. ve, e sts et. 4 r9 0
/~n*M A*sutr$ 6 E A' r / s r a /) w rdt vs s. L/C ns ff.S T (Aff /fPAGE~ /8 ) 15 A peettunistjf
//2'"* 4syty 746 V A u L' E Ib ?S
- D ess 7A// dLoffb NC/T/cM (FIG,1), r//r Ag. rus 70AL kid: Add A TE D
/3* FNCM 7WE FA cid D/44*C 7/CM. (485 sf),
la Ad.s fsA?/A'/NC.
~704 fue 2)' Aerva reA ( Tr ) = //.? ##
J 3r Ms 704' foste s &cAlsne rEL) sss ren/A//4/q
'r~os q uin (Q) f
- Et r U#l,,,,.
.: //,63 K it
=
evsese f
%
- A t run ron Aas to asest 4 FAto-7W (ME /6)
- O F4 f u e.o
%.
- Pk AN E
)
% r_
T 'i 8 p,7e i
-s cz6.' i SMAF7 se sa* t e R g
(L) l Revision O
l Page
/
f'f/fJ l
Prepared By/Date T'e
/
W of ZZ L.
Ched.ed By/Date l// p f/;/c l
l3 nutech San Jos2. California 2/sa Nuclear Power Station 7
Projec':
File No.M8' 02#0.'- ;
owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company 3
Y. Czerse os nessas ex s p e e,p o w h.,coxes cQ ) ox saa non mui.rs +eveurso se ass rs.cr ass. /).
A7 /r0 nom suu. cre,v, 74,orr says soow.-
rea9ue = as,2r3 h-/Ls M
l Messc u e ispsrsese (& J = *>,7pda..
4 Res.s </re Sceoss bist C A)]g ) = 00 0 C ps E pimiyr apzraw (pa) = o, wr %/'
O now im,s = r,s,.s su' '%J/
i
)
' h~ i V
i fxorse rso,ce ss os vsc h x oies= no w a l
44 A/p3 E S// APE O e
77 f 4'./9)(20) f ?? ( /0,4l3)(.16)
=
I 4
a yo '/
= t'r 7,3 e ix '
ov noto ness ts,) = Ef-A c
o 4.r1 l I0.1{\\
f(go)' - +'r9,3
=
>]
usw. n'- er9,3 = 797,3 Y h *
=
From Mosterum spus riod G=
PV(YdA) =
Q
- Ag V
c s.
Revision a
Page 2.
Prepared By/Date C G/'J/fa 2
Checked By/Date
'f40//H3-PC
3 nutech Sin Jose. Cahfornia 2/oN. Nuclear Power Station Project p g, go, gg m,mo; Owner Cominonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth E<lison Company u
);~69 vfl Ce /7/ = Ups 7R FAM VFA.oe/TV v,,,, 4, = s.6 sw 'Vmb 4
fu V A, = 97 u
i
]'
v/e4e Y
ya = cleasWy upsbw1 ya = Ve/ ceil ufshe'M y
J>r = deasiry *r reos r IQ svNet
%, = #'.hy7, y = 0~#
M VA (#%)=-PA A%'A V
s "P r
f 0
= ss;rv4 (p,r.1) 3aaicc'%v
==
r.gsw(tyd'k)
G q
Yu =
h4 (a wy(p g,cg,y)(.irr's,-fp)
SC4.37 $ fee
=
., F* =-(p /o) {yu) = O m r r) l'!V' f)
- y 1
(Se %) (p.a 't--H at -sec
//f /? /b/
/pr PAe77 ce.vD/r/oAss f
=
/SJ' 2G h-/4
/V,57 Av, noe els4' durfR sp Mrssans '=
=-
,,q,2,y
= Seek h o eir,v fox vruc iry Im,1x = M /dy' 47
}
when M = /,0 7= as'3 'f = yyy *q Revision O
I Pm 3
Prepared By/Date 74 4/N/c g
Checked By/Cate DAS/ leg-Pd
TJ nutech San Jose. Cahfornia Project 7/d// Nuclear Power Station File No/##). 0035 owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company f pf
- f(/* W2r2ND,3Mmj = n u,a Wsc.
/7 U
f = () VA ) %,
(3 2 2 f.f;5' &^. ) [ l3 3 di/3 h5
/L{
=
J u2 ?f' C 2
[$$ ffm/v) (J2.2
'6*~#$4/-See)
/
& CA/7fR 0 ; pfff S St/R G :
- ?! $ iAr, El SMCd THE Calf 4/E Aff AWEC7/GA-7/4'd As).)
~7/r f dd cE } A s,'T
/NVEST/d-A 760 807,// f#a+'/G/7.fod/s. flott) A7 7Hf YM/O/ 7 A /!? // A V E 7A*E ZA,Y f j:/0CJ /)A 7// dEDMB T/t,)',,T T /5 SEAEaAG-E
'fd ASSUM8 TWA 7, (/)
PAG.c.s un E A/JD VE406/7)/ P/offt-E.T ARdS/MstrAgl(k)ypg ggyrg4 pp pggggggse go,tg. 54,37 k/s o,
/4 7//E S 4Mf a'0dA 7/4%! c 4/ TBA D/.Se o
/7 /4 WE4SONA3 2 70 44SUMd THE CEA/7Ed tf PAESSutts /d// t-J/E BE7*RJEE4' l
Tff e64TERS dAt.c yw TEb fdA 7~4f M/4//.+fVM u,As TREAM VE/,0d/7)/ Asta 7Wg /s'4g/xyz (s/u'ih) I'E
- 01my, 7/ESE/~r>RE,
+
s,xases e.io rasas wicc se cmeuarsa 7sa raese Pu a
B d'y UD M'd u s a 7/0 % S Fo*x r/E ct?:E.vdE' RE 7#5 dl?Abey'N/**'2 7*oR9uE /s
//R "'
1
/9 is'7 /N'
- 4?
,C4=
/
/7,fG /At = /H 0/
l
,Cg~
=
]
1 l
Revision d
Page
/
Prepared By/Date fi. o 0,l/t;'c g
pg f
ecked By/Date Do.6/4-/&Pd Ct 1
3.'-
nutech San Jose. Cahfornia l
/e# Nuclear Power Station File No.44 DNS Prokt Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Commonwealth Edi<on Company Chent 3
f, N/Arju r.44
/ deus.oris / S/f Ar3 fx fl&JE (f
- ffah' AE &
0 $f# FAo** OJ os S D, F en & E,C
/AJ f
3 e
a ss x.
ps = 7a r M,cos30*
IhLos30*
/
g
/
y A
A r;.es" CM" I 3100" t.3 t"
^
S R
E l
L Saf'a Cos30* = 3,33 K VKMg=0 Rg : 3,33 - // o 3f ?;.
) = 0 34 7 l
Rg : //,03 * (s.6C -o 3 67 =- /7.12 3
- I3 uer A
.t. % 3 K
' o.3c7
- af.o s" HI.SI K
$!.16 L
M s3,0f I 10 I
Rewsion Pm
[
Prepared By/Date W 6/?/a3 of n,
1 Checked By/Date
- u G/H M ol i
i l1 nutech San Jose. Californis 2 taw Nuclear Power Station Fife No.4'Ifo2 ot's P
t
-s Commonwealth Edison Company owner Commonwealth Edison Company client K
d A s E.5,
/57 = /s; of fc/, e os 3 o' = 6 i S*
/
lig=
4, $ - 2, q t,.2 K
3,337
=
1.
w K
Rs =
!! o a ' 13.0 - 2.ca r = a o. 49 a
,. e K
1 J.963 V
A 9
6 o
jr-3.S*3 *1k 7A g
i
- It.03 r
x M
V"
.21.r,4f
$ lf #A aLecCD, foR C G,S P.ERfE4'D/2 UL.4 P ~ro f x~
Um i
U,S'*'3**
r t s;u 30*
/
e s.
A, n
l
- 6 Rg d AS &.T f& s530 ' [. 9 a <
ctst 1
%, a 30* = 3.7:n G
l ls:r 1,
Revision 0
1 Page f
Prepared By/Date 74 4[/.'/<D of 2 2.
Checked By/Date t/,C/6-73-Sa
..g nutech
]
San Jose. Cahfornia "A
2/e# Nuclear Power Station Project File No. 8fM,0M/
Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent Commonwealth Edison Company b
ease z m
Y = Ve, = Vc = 1. % K g
/d = 0 s
// c: /6,09 i
d A r e r_
,)
L V = V = v = 2.grk s
e g
0 Me= 3.1.9ak" d-
/Mu. Mexem,
s/.e;u, Toa 7ut,s Nlg = /'/ fail k" 7e = 1/2 "K K
Va = //,63 Me=
{(16.r0**(fr,7s)*
9s,23
=
7~g = //2 "<
Vc = l (o.90) % (3,757 = 4. 't8 K
-R 1
- l.,
}~
M
~
l t
Revision O
l ag 7
Prepared By/Date 7/ 4/a/sv l
CI i 46/4-13-ad j
i
.. Checked Sv/Date D
3
nutech San Jose California 2,cu. Nuclear Power Station Project File No.ZV fo2,0cc C owner C mm nwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Edi<on Company 3
4 Anoros stap sr4't.ss G Bsw4 (8)
M e
32 #
J 2 ( /Y/ a-/ )
7,(y, & = ff,77? **'
8
.2-10 3 t. /6 Y_
H cita 2 1'3/ y e' 7
n o' ~
=
,, ( y,,,.y 3 T=E=
I' o3
- y ksE.
y 4
% (,ur) A YY +( r +Y Y C ASF, r )
S=
T v
3 9
- IC #Y
(
+(7,451+c,79)L
/2. V 7 "#
~
f
=
3
,.a I
l 7 Mniaux JAen.chs.sc e P,as cc.)
l l
t y
e.ri a
y Mr4-b3 F<
II
- L
,(a,nS)4 - 12r 0.ref O'* C ig
- L l
I 1-m r un << -- L se., r s
l'fo736 W 7
4 Tu. n c2 u)'3- '"')l[*59 6)
(b)
= 6, 33 6 lo #
I 5 M A F T 4 T c..
Fore Es (f14, 2 )
A = se' LL x ?.?f& id i*
1 Revision o
Pm 8
Prepared By/Cate T?te T/f/fo y
1ff/ff/.*o
/
i Checked By/Date
'W wy -
nutech
+
San Jose. Calsfornia Ridd Nuc! car Power Station File No'6 4.bt).oco C Project
'I Commonwealth Edison Company O.vner Commonwealth Edison Company
?
Client A.
WAIC N A 70, AfD L 5 ( // +0 Q as e gAgg) (3gg py g,
fsCo$he#'J,J2K 4.
h L.
im" L
- z n -
G
$28 =0 g
!!.oJC 3# )C n.33)- = f,fgLR I
R A coa b o
- lta.13 ")/ 47 74 "
/
E 47, 7ta L
Aa =
6 917*
1.qtu Ya t.
e
-S 32" w'eg l-c M1L I
f -rs 24 "* '
- r o. u'<
l
~~~
- c. - a,.,,
m-
~ $e$$"
V )g(oO
'"/z 19; Q
1 5
n n
Eo A t O
O Revis;on a
Page 9
Prepared By/Date 7efe 5~/f[fo Of 21 Checked By/Date 6M [/;/l0
El nutech i
San J:se. Cahfornia 2/cv Nuc! car Power Station Proicct gg,g,,,,,,,.
0*ner Commonwealth E<li+on Company "1
Chent Commonwealth E<lison Company a4J mj
- sn fa & /$ * = //so3 w /O ' = f, ff A
- 1 K/, = 24 f/a = J. ff
/
4J G
Ag =. 3.(S~ - [ # {yf,
= A 26 #
"J
~~
R =
f,s*S~ + 7 4f -/s.2 C = /3 93 K g
c1 4,'ll '
\\
.:, n%
NI I -i,2 fA
-1ss' u
W.1f
J'~
p"
. ls. tI
k y.
- 100,53 *
[kcck womE< T l
{&'S.ElY +(SS,.?&)Lf' ~ '70.1,,3 l
O l
~~
0 AM. STAfss Po/NT b
i s___
$9 e
a,ecos e x, n ia.
,L
+
suACT 3
3
//
22 l
Tafft PM tobene r = p,faS #
Q = / fr 76*d i" I 1
d Q = te.33 Gin l
Revision O
Prepared By/Date 74 (f///fo Checked Bv/Date PASN'N3--3d OI l
~
l ' '
nutech San Jose. California Project 2/ou Nuclear Power Station g,
y,,
Owner Commonwealth Edison Company
]
Client Commonwealth Edison Company Te&c f
}
G n'n' cose M,i es is e q (,, zy (ou) ra ru 0
2 31 0
8,37 e
If C.10 C,97 19,07 1
30 7:2&
/4S'l
/t,80 W
Sa13 14, 32
.ts,.2s*
60 1: 19
- 19. 99 29,M l
7f
.7,17 2.7.29 2 9,46 90 0
.23.08 23,c8 fi M ~fA8f f d ed
- a
$ma.c # S Y, YS
. 4pg A' bb
[EE 6 dj ff e 2Mb 7*
n
,]
W d'A C.
W: /rf/J #
D = 46.25 "
7 * //2
)
S*Yl t l* YS 7756
= 0, ff Ks $
l A '=
=
y r
kc o
(-ff 4- ['?' * *Yv) '
l
~* 'W'yy S=
T lP.
l i' J a
l l
Revision B
l Prepared By/Date
?Z (;/ /50 N
of 22.
Checked By/Date r46//-n-eol j ---
3' nutech San Jose. California 2 fog Nuclear Power Station File No.4ff02M$5 Project Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client A
fr NAtufs/M s/E44 374ES: 47' M)'/A)/ (A)
^
3 oi=0 g * = [44.,
/Jf// )-
7, y3 :sc A
7 77 (Y,2C)
T " YU * #'#Y[rrcos-) h-t/,nt)(wQ " 0
V S = % 63 N
J'7*G EJ f C # 7*K10 74MP PU/,S &6 sis, /f-8 ffE 30$
Sj=3ch'SC l3
//4'/7 4'CRKMU C7 sass CM PAVJ /h/ $# ERA f/?f5 7) m s e,,w,
4 2 7 7"
/,2?f//2)
,,,,3 psc/p g
=
j g
U e?D if Z-
.?(M2:~)(/rT3 2) **
/<)ff4C.
d = cha, ef3 'll d= ch. J pih 1
l l
l l
l Revision O
I Page
/ 2, Prepared By/Date W f/B/O g
Checked By/Date
@6//--/3-M
i nutech ll i.
San Jose. Cahfornia si # - Nuclear Power Station File No.4# SoMoo6 Project Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Commonwealth Edi+on Company client A's Y, G A 41.sr <*oto Daud SrssL 6fri.ss e.v f
4 p,.,a-r.2,itr e.ta s "
7~< //> #'N e
I t
$ = c;7/
h W
F*
=
k
)
s.ur h
a/ c h f$s r$i v -e w e n a Neen,.sdee :ln=
- w r
/
(Red 5 )
}
S.sg = 0.777 sg
= 4 777(30 ) = /7,.9) "'
4 cress M y (kts, 8 )
SH&M
}
T = V4 f =
,,7 77 y = ?, 3 7 ' '
dnusows-SnrEss (A'SF, f )
],
2 A = d 7/3(s!) = 3.M jy -
S 6 = f
- a. j f yf '5 E
t e = 30
,b 1
1 I
Revision O
Page
/4 Prepared By/Date I'#'f[f/8#
y7
]
c - u n n o ns,e AF wa i
T'-
nutech San Jose. Cahforni:
y f cr/ Nuclear P wer Station File No./# #C2.M Project Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Chent Commonwealth Edison Company
]
.S UMyn ny e t PC3 dL TR PAR 7 Max, satte Arte, sexpik&
s a x sem parssore y&ntry:si JTMtsS (ks1) 17ssSS.LkSX)
.STAf33 (KST) tfAtLbu g J4497 97%Y 9 PINS
/4.97
.St2 dxtw/
- 7. c 3
~1 I
b5b
@fw&g.
/M7 I
'l Wo
~
7Atgg pin.$
7: /3
~
-y
.3
.ts Y To 37
/9.99
&2%
LE v?R
[Lf Ib %
'3 (f + 't* *-
M A X, 3 EEAR 479545 FDA SWAP T =
NAX.
.5 HEAR srREs1 fett 74PER Pt.vs =
2,.,u,,4 i,l NAxi fHEAll CTAECS /CA MEf =
2'syg,og g
frl//, 6 CMP /FCS1vf.STA'fsS = oj" g,,u j
l
/et =- l5 fen JWEA/{
.fyggSS Att o cJ A BL E =
k 5
} =.3 0 foAt dom M ESstdy
=
N 84 SED CA/ MaxtMUM kJ7047/04/ 24'ERff 'TH,foRf.SHSS Al 3 74f CS l
susameLx en '7 3/ xsi Uhf.fo,P.25-BO)
L>
l Reusion C
l Page
/[
Prepared By/Date W /-r [?8d og 22 Checked Ov/Date I,6N k%'df3 I
l
g.. -
nutsch Sin hs?. Cthfornia 2 no y Nucleu Power Mation Project File No.d'L foWoC Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client Commonwealth Eilison Company 8 AldUL A T/04 Of f/Ff d 7/v6 LEVE R /1AM 4fNs 7H eLbSG O L O *)
/155 unt2 f
\\
/
FULL l CCMfffCCED JWW$
l TW CfEd f0317/od 7-aR TLDLo Yl M4/ [f TENuco = do "@ C'esED
-_w-E --
^-
)
3 p}
y.; : ~.
"suasr E<rauswN Ov L!
fs.
, N n
c'
.Z o ~
50' l'7 'l
\\.
- 0 5l 1o08 eyt.H (70')
20 SZ 10 0 L 30 Sk 10e li ao S4 to.t9 cc iS tc 4 L Go SS' lo n9L 70 S'l 10.29 fo 52.
10 0 %
~
10 0
1 k
LSigQ PIVO T L ; Ide 9I6$
5WdtT I-l 8
r 9
A Ri% E0$E bl Revision d
Page
//o i_
Prepared By/Date 7,4 5[f//d Checked By/Date
,U 78 40 J
t
3' nutech San Jose. California z on. Nuclear Power Station File No. 6L ##2.Nb Pr t
Commonwealth Etlison Company Owner Commonwealth Eilison Company Client d'f/S Mh' foldfc
/
A, h 4 7i/Ra t.
Forpuzw'cf
/. Y t., + MA ss of
$/sc
( D kid 7 44 9, Purr 6. )
~
You. Disc PA4rc c 77r
- f = 77 ( ?) '(/. 2r) = /3 07, 73 43
N in=(o281 53)(/307.931a3) 4 Gota 40 )
= 0,96 /
Zo Yo r. + mass en b rJC fo65 (OA4fd-8, - 7$f f
/gA 77 6)
O
} "( // fo 3 75 )(2,g ") = /Al % 2 2 IN yor =
YS h in =
, 2fg ( / 97,2 2 ) + 3 gg, yo =
g, pp g 3-YC L. + InAss os Daap Dis c PL A 74 C DiG 8 - 7(,y,3, 744 77 ro.)
}n (g z y -, y ) = g:ri ( at.2r '. 2 ; 2) ( 7,q g y = p o s,9 y ;,a ye s. =
.2 8Y (2 03,4 9) f 3 6'Cafo = 0, /50 # **O4/
M =
4 J/o s.. + m nes cf Yo? Hus.expeA-C Oto6. a - 76td, P/A rr. c'o.)
b Y=
(7,0)(6sr)(d.C LC) ~ Q,zr)(G.7)(/)
7CTV(J.875)*f7.75")
f[ff.t81)(77) 3 2 9f.JS* W
=
= C.120 * ^ *A +'
"~3 lh = ( 289)(29f.35) + 3SC.)
Q.
G Yes e mass ep Bo rroM Nua stoc.x (Dw&, A -460, hes ry)
V = (4,375)(4 7)(4. 2r) + f (q.tr7.(,77)
,73rv(3.s'7r)3(c) l
/39.c2/4
=
M -= o.tS'i(/30.08) f 38G.V =- c.696 # * "An fr, 7a~ fat bise Mass = o. 9 s / 4 e rl o +, lf +,210 +.0 fb = /. C3 7 *ISNd Revision o
Page
/7/f Prepared By/Date fit,.. 7/'r/3
. Chnked Be/Da2@
I. MIS /GI
I nutech L*
San Jose. Cahfornia
- r.,m Nuclear Power Station Pr @ t Fde No.6A fb2.@6 Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent b
7, 6. n o n *1,r s s o f se.9fr th =, 7dryD's, c 7tsst (%n)'(</7) = JSt.76 Ja3 m =
26f(44si 76) f 38G Y =
do '/7 " **/M 3
..,_ n =. o,w, = s..,. m:~,
}
- s. zaearm or sw r J
rr("?)/V
= /6, o t,c i n #
I = rAf/9
=
- 9. 'YA r et A A t CAEputN cy (FeeM Ro sest g - rs cr/ Epi rion.) CA% /-C
~
'S g
C.93
-m v s.s o,,,g a ex
-R i
ar o
w (a t zio & Y//1 04)
=
- g, y
(/s$37)(17)) + o393 ( of){4'7)Y fio D = Go e / $,Se c o.etekt47 son @
- 03s*.1 #d. (30//)=Co6y l
}
to, fe on RE F. /0, 7?fE 4
nes = m n =. (i. n1+ ain (.4XJrs. 4) = 3 ism Id.s fo de cows 5AVA 7/Va s-A
/. 5~ 'h e {*a 4>tW Ae A,0plIepl
'd> qceoav f ba Ydz oVbs.t s+ codes. A/s' o,,sduce A*'SpN.sa M 771 is ^Js7~ 4t/ Asea 842 e d SG U,, a> Ne/ sb elos e g
tS >%. zPA, M'is coon /a/ Je enGea c asos w n d ve,
Fa oc = /,f(3/.% 29 ) ~; 'l')'O '5*
ffE set 5,W4 fcneE s 4 7o of eest.Z (p. C) amD 5 sfest. 70 3 to 6f CASE E [f}o 6) le cens}cb'Itoc/ Inso'y/Ws c'nol'.
Thexehe e esn Revision O
I Page /78 Prepared by/Date ft 7/H/ro I
c., ~
n..,,-.g rM/4 w j
l' nutech San Jose. Cahfornia 2 sc4 Nuclear P wer Station File No.$4 EMN Project Commonwealth Edison Company Owner C mmonwealth Edison Company client
.DJiO2.T A
]
c A tr>JI 4 T1 4 WrBr2cbVVAfArc. TDf2ctJE C1 THE HYDcobVtJAM(c TOBCOC VALUES CALCO LATED ItJ C1 EEFEFEMCE i PjO2E P2EDItATTD c>J A CoJTAiMMDJT Pr5sso2E
[]
0F 42 7 PS/A.
TAKIMG 7His-FbsTULATEI) Tessocr-TIME do2VE FD(2 TME-EIC*J MOLLE %2. SprTloM U2EFE12a)Cr 9) itJTo L1 I
Acco urJT 17E50LT% lel Lop)Et2.- (4'<D2CDYlJAkflG. TDf2CJC' VALU:3 As FOLLck/5:
0 "FET7 Tete 'iEATT t ALs/E 4ATA Lod t>r ; TitSE Bu 77EEFLY
/
/.
VALVEL CLDEE 907= Id 3 SffodL%
cf
'3 M*DS - =.os7 8(
DED2CL:5 CEG
- z. Ass 0MV A 'z.o srcoub INSTEQ4EUT' LAG TIMC EETwen!
i e
rm-rim r A Pcs rou.7sD LocA occoes Aus r.w ymc w vauic gec.cives A ccanrupaJr tsciArc4 %/6AIAL.,
l J
.~]
TIME AFTdL LOCA Vs. VAWE Enc Ad6LE[:h !
l
"" ]
TsMr = 2.o+(.o37)(d o "'8'
~
I Revision o
p Prepared By/Date hu/6 '6-Bo g
73
--Checked Sv/Date ht, S'Mfo i j
1' nutech San Jose. California Project _ Blcd, Nuclear Power Station File No_ M.@2M6 Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Client l
3 a
rave - e., e ee ceer. a 3
}
ASSOVis tJS h19.- TD BE A 'PE2-Fi%T 6A%
C.r P m
% 6(LT )2. D'
)
To2GUE =
gg-
= (0-T 6 D Pcr.n,)M*
Fof. pcm r, E ( s )
- 27.g pbA,
M = I,D (T@UEhrt (OriD H Pcour) w
]
C7DZCUE) m (0-T 6b M )(Pcom.be t
]
SidCE (CT 6 D 14*) IS ccnJ57AMF 5
( T Of2 G D C h g (TDf2QOE\\,39
=
(P w. b %
. fop _. %, e 27,6 Ps/A -
(%r e6 (Tof200Eh3%e gg r
9 l
l l
CI Revision O
p j7 Prepared By/Date M / 6-le-to I
Checked By/Date W. 5'h 6//-1
i j' "/
nutech San Jose. Caiifornia Project 2104 uclgr Power Stati n File No.h4 WMO-Commonwealth Cilison Company Owner Commonwealth Eilison Company Client
,1
)
4, M.SUME VALVG" CLO$E% l'oMPWTZ~lW S~O SECO!)% FCu. oui %
/SotA77cd $6 MAL.
,I 1
M
% e.
Pcwrs,av ox Tb rav c..
(& ' red (SecO (Psia)
(frd6d S
O
- 2. 0 (M =.s \\)
25,1 40,csi fo 2.37 26,2 9pr
}
/C 2.56 26.b ll? O2i i
cl 20 7.1%
29,6 107, sic
{
30 3.1 I 30sI 86,bW 40 sAS 32 7 m,is 3
&o 4.22.
- 3s,1 24272.
l]
70 4, S3
%,6 9,S 2 8,
l, so 4.c> s s,.,
2,sw j
]
Il 90 7.00 1427
~42,0 25 ;.
.. i 3
Also Tot 2 ave = 0 r PM* B' D f~p1Avu%Cs)4 FusTULATED Fwh/ :
a,
"'T'bffCufccav,-
(3d9paArr (I7 '?)h 0I T4MVE~tbwe
~
[FM*-)gz (2s,2X.97)' ' 2.05 3)
Revision o
p, yg Prepared By/Date t>%/5-IW f
ZA Checked By/Date 7;t, S/:</es:
1
m.
,,l e'
nutech San Jose. California
& ion Nuclear Power Station File No/ U F82.o##6 Project Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Commonwealth Edison Company Chent.
RSF'En ENeE.s
}
I. 2.e r ra R, :r. E. si no n rx A (Nsany PM 7 r a o. ), re D,osaesa l'Nu rGeH)j 7*08 7 v e T s.s r VAL u ts, 4pa // 19,1986 2, T. SA Af KMA, "foAquG ;( dA W rse ~7/og d AAq 46 7E4/3r/6$
ef BurreArcLf v%vt ,
ASME TouRMA L)g &,
/9l;/
- 3. RICHARD 5 0, " f lu t h A d H A N /C.S Woku LUEle fSONS,Isod.
d
)
196 /, P, i.e 3 g
i llENA,V St,str do.y "'/2. ZNcf BarrtefLf DRAviNGS f W
SPecificA rio,v,5 " c'ses pass 16, e. )
M, 5.S,po rrs, #Oes);Al of AfAsdipt E/enuls,# Pgenyiee -//su.,
l)
.S~
k Zud., /97/, Pgi /23.
Nolesl d Jo'vi,us0, "d,o laoesi.e do,vsiedu bow s/
G fo.
.SlArssj S/nss'o,sivo S/ne,vf,# /& deaw /i4Y/Boad s.
l br AEdl/oh 7i ddy, foxes,, //lae/liNexj' 's 41w/dooA , 11 f 382,, ig //32 -//40<
)
}
- 8. SHicLE], JosEfH Eowx,eb, Jfeep,oeat Ex lys spig beg y,"
Ale 6'44as fiY Book do. y /f 7.z,.y, 333 -
.,.aj
- 9. FLME I4.5.4-b ; PWW22--TeMPETATDt2e-60/202,~ tion! A)oa0}f Fbary,sTA7t'al, fir /At SAFE 7y Atuotyss Egog(*
i\\
- 10. P MECTMtAE-M) A(tb bGMTrx), zice ?rhT)os/ Fp+1 stew fPJRA' TE2 Ill'N ig Revision d
p yf S'/#dd Prepared By/Date 5 c-M M
l Checked By/Date
,[/3Y k'?/$1.)
r,-. m. -.s = -
g, y 1
nutech San Jose. Cahfornia Project 2/ou Nuclear Power Station File No./N42E05 Commonwealth Edison Company Owner Client Commonwealth Edison Company EEffAE//06<
}
Daviess, sese,' marr co., //arees, zuwci.s A - 41s.t RoLLEA BEAR /NC-
.1 0~WO STAMDrM D. SQuppe KE,VS 0- 4.3 st SranDan o rasen Psy orANxs 3
-g 3 - 77 80 F/M. FAS. A EVER Ass,V. fon f4x2:. dy1 a opsn.
B -773 3 des 7act ass,y, B-74 & 7 FMMMED p/sc f4A TE A}n D -747; FM'tsH&O Desp pisc, pxers B-74 '73 rov &q D/.sc purs B-77s8 dyA/4'DE& OfERA70e MCCEMBA)/
B-765 8
//ue Asseest,}' son offs a r Disc.
3-?756 4h" Ma.. SU4fr fon 9/ ' VAv&
l C-?G/
9/ " Rous H FAs, c,n a r Da e. SE4 D/MG A$$ 'f, C-963 f/" D/.sc As Ex 1.,V Cdt O FF.S E 7 D's e G
e -17 4 ri" nea.ea sesna, wa4 o ero, os,ss r sisa n o-csr-o su y.
e-uz w" nweo
,n.
omer s,se dYI8 6En/U$ /}$.SfMBA-)/ fo/7/r! d)'4 Q
F,z 3 2 9 " Az4 spw/t noaen sewyc,, spse>AL k8 wasp exD F4ae/cA red BoDj
?-]
As q
L.d I
J Revision O
Page Sc2 Prepared By/Date 7*L S/:7lD g
yg