ML19331B910
| ML19331B910 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 08/07/1980 |
| From: | Clayton F ALABAMA POWER CO. |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008130516 | |
| Download: ML19331B910 (2) | |
Text
Alabam+, Power Company 600 Noth 18th Street Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Telephone 205 250-1000 m
F. L CLAYTON, JR.
senior Vice President Alabama Power the southem electic system August 7, 1980 Docket No. 50-364 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Attention: Mr. A. Schwencer JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 2 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Gentlemen:
Enclosed is Alabama Power Company's response to NRC Reactor Systems Branch question 210.1, items 1 and 2.
Alabama Power Company will respond to item 3 by August 22, 1980, and iteia 4 by March 1981.
If you have any further questions, please advise.
Yours verf truly, '
'b]$l :n.
- F. L. Clayton, Jr.
RWS/rt i
Enclosure cc: Mr. R. A. Thomas Mr. G. F. Trowbridge Mr. L. L. Kintner Mr. W. H. Bradford WS/
N>
/!/
800813 0 6 f 6 (r
~
~
ENCLOSURE' Item 1 In ' addition to insulation deoris resulting' from LOCA effects, debris can be generated within the containment from other sources, such as (1) degraded materials (paint chips), and (2) items which are taken into J
and-left in the containment following maintenance and inspection activities.
Describe.how the housekeeping orogram for Farley will control and limit
- debris accumulation from these sources. The objective is to assure that debris capable of defeating the post-LOCA core cooling functions are identified and removed from the containment. The response should include references to specific procedures or other means to assure that "as licensed" cleanliness will be attained prior to initial operation and prior to each resumption of operation.
l-Resoonse i
FNP-0-AP-35, General Plant Housekeeping and Cleanliness Control, and FNP-2-STF-34.0, Containment Integrity, which define the plant house-keeping requirements and the containment inspectio.: criteria required
.for plant operation, respectively, insure that FNP will control and limit debris accumulation from the above mentiorci sources.
l FNP-2-STP-34.0, as listed above,.which is contained on the surveitlance schedule, will insure that "as licensed" cleanliness will be attained prior to initial operation and prior to each resumption of power.
Item 2 Address the degree of compliance of Farley with the following recommendations which is also set forth as item C.14 of Regulatory Guide 1.82:
" Inservice inspection requirements for coolant sump components (trash racks,
' screens, and pump suction inlets) should include the following:
a.
Coolant sump components should be inspected during every refueling period downtime, and b.
The inspection should be a' visual examination of the components for evidence of structural distress or corrosion."
Resconse The. Unit 2 ~ Technical Specifications, section 4.5.2.0.2 currently requires
'the above stated recommendations to be performed. The Technical Specifications requirements are addressed in FNP-2-STP-34.0 " Containment Inspection".
4
._-..,_.,-._,_m.--
_ -..,,-_. __