ML19331B883
| ML19331B883 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/07/1980 |
| From: | Himmebauch N CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19331B879 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008130475 | |
| Download: ML19331B883 (4) | |
Text
-
00-
_. C C
00 ggg
>d GREYBOOK OPERATPIG DATA REPORT CA CD DOCKET NO. 50-155 4
jf OPERATING STATUS
- 1. UNIT NAME:
BIG ROCK POINT NUCLEAR PLANT 2.' REPORTING PERIGD:
7 / 80
.3.
LICENSED THERMAL POWER (MWT):
240 4
4-tlAMEPLATE RATING (GROSS MWE):
.75
- 5. ~ DESIGN ELECTRICAL RATING (NET HWE):
72
- 6. liAXIMUM DEPENDADLE CAPACITY (GROSS MWE):
69.0
- 7. MAXIMUM DEPENDADLE CAPACITY (NET MWE):
65.0 6.
- 9. POWER LEVEL TO WHICH RESTRICTED,IF ANY (NET MWE):
63.0 10.
THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE CUMULATIVE
- 11. HOURS IN REPORTING PERIDD 744.0 5111.0 152034.0
- 12. NUMBER OF HOURS REACTOR WAS CRITICAL 706.2 4751.4 104084.4
- 13. REACTOR RESERVE SHUTDOWN HOURS
- 14. IlOURS GENERATOR ON-LINE 692.0 4724.5 102723.4
- 15. UNIT RESERVE SHUTDOWN HOURS
' 16. GROSS TilERMAL ENERGY GENERATED (MWH) 138343.0 984791.0 19102722.0
- 17. GROSS ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATED (MWH) 42379.0 300479.0 6036396.0
- 18. NET. ELECTRICAL ENERGY GENERATED (MWH) 400G5.5 283913.3 5712252.5
- 19. UNIT SERVICE FACTOR 93.0%
92.4%
67.6%
4
- 20. UNIT AVAILADILITY FACTOR 93.0%
92.4%
67.6%
- 21. UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR (USING MDC NET) 82.7%
06.1%
55.5%
- 22. UNIT CAPACITY FACTOR (USING DER NET) 74.7%
77.2%
52.2%
- 23. UllIT FORCED OUTAGE RATE 0.0%
0.8%
23.4%
6 1
1
DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER (MWT)
(MWEN)
( 7/80) 1 206.96' 60.11 2
206.46 59.83 3
206.92 60.07 4
193.75 55.92 5
208.25 60.38 6
210.79 60.88 7-192.54 55.17 8-208.87 60.58 9
200.79 60.04 10 208.46 60.33 11-208.87 60.50 12 199.75 50.02 13 208.37 60.15 14 206.71 59.75 15 205.37 59.40 16 205.37 59.52 17 206.04 59.84 18 205.67 59.67
- 19 204.42 59.40 20 203.03 59.24 21 202.00 59.01 22 197.71 57.59 23 187.25 54.87 24 20.46 3.42 25 1.04 0.0' 26 81.00 20.88 27 101.00 52.96
(
28 184.21 53.63 29 193.42 56.38 30 204.04 59.29 31 205.87 60.00
)
3 A.
P
V U
50-155 DOCKET NO.
UNITSilUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCDONS UNIT NAME Bin Roc k Point DATE 8/7/80 COMPLETED BY Nilimehrmch REPORT MONTil July 1980 TELEPIIONE 616-547-6517 v 180 ar.
C g
O, Cause & Conective jg 3
$.M Licensce ft No.
Date o-EF f,
2s$
Event s ~9 91 Action to Pscvent Recurrence 8'0
}U 6*
j@
y
}.;jjg Repost u d
7 7/24/80-n/a n/a Scram testing requirement of I E 7/26/80 S
52 D
163 e--------
(Since startup on 11/9/79, all shutdowns have been due to regulatory shutdowns.
Big Rock Point would have operated 26.'s consecutive days if two regulatoi y
sh.stdowns had not been imposed.
In January for Three Mile Island modi-fications, Big Rock was shutdown for 'f. days. The second shutdown was
.ne to the scram testing re-quireinents of I E Bulletin 80-17.
i*
4 3
4 1
2 Method:
Ex!ubit G - Instiuctions F: Forced Reason:
1 Manual for Psepasation of Data S: Scheduled A Ihguipment Failure (Explain) 2 Manual Scram.
Entry Sheets foi 1.icensec li-Maintenance of Test 3 Automatic Scram.
Eveni Repuni ILER) File iNtlREG-C-Refueling 4 Other (Explain) 0161)
D Regulatory Restriction E-Operator Training & License Examination 5
F-Administrative Exhibit I-Same Source G-Operational En ror (Explain) c)/77)
Il-Other (F xplain)
fh 3..'J ly 'l'980
-i i
,1 :
'Refueling Infornation Request l.:
Facility name:
BIG ROCK POINT PLANT 2.
Scheduled date.for next refueling shutdown:
October 1980 3.
Scheduled date for restart following shutdown:
November 1980 4.
Uill refueling or resumption of operation thereaf ter require a technical specification change or other license amendme.at?
No If yes, explain.
If no, has the reload fuel design and core configuration been reviewed by Plant Safety Review Committee to determine whether any unrevleued safety questions are associated uith the core reload (Ref.10CFR,Sec.50.59)?
No
-If no review has taken place, when is it scheduled?
~
July 1980 5.
Scheduled date(s) for submittal of proposed licensing action and supporting information:
None 6.
Important licensing considerations associated with refueling, e.g., new
- or different fuel design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance ana-lysis methods, significant changes in fuel' design, new operating procedures:
September 1980~
88 7.
Number'of. fuel assemblies in:
core 84
. spent fuel storage pool
- 8..Present licensed spent fuel storage capacity:
193
- Size of' any ~ increase in licensed storage capacity that has been requested or is planned -(in number of fuel assemblies):
248
~
9.
Projected date of the last refueling that can be discharged to spent fuel
?
pool' assuming the present licensed capacity:
-1983 7
' :b; "Tffp9 r
srey a=