ML19331B391

Slide Presentation Entitled, Viewgraphs for Presentation to ACRS Subcommittee on Reactor Radiological Effects

ML19331B391
Person / Time
Issue date:	05/22/1980
From:	Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To:
Shared Package
ML19331B390	List: ML19331B389 ML19331B391
References
FRN-44FR75167, RULE-PR-50 ACRS-1751, NUDOCS 8008120014
Download: ML19331B391 (10)

Text

.

e

(

v M'

b M

A

'{

th S

TC E

f f

E LAC I

OG TOL NO OI I D TA AR TNR 0

EO 8

ST 9

EC 1

iA t

PE R 2

R 2

O1 :

F0 YA SE M

l E

i PT AT RI GM WM EO I C VBUS SRCA l

l i

l O

=

0 4

i 9

tC y # C5 o

OCCUPATIONAL RAUIATION EXPOSURE j

SOURCE TERMS a ALARA UNDES CRUD BUILDUP & REMOVAL l

UNDES EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION UNDES POST-ACCIDENT EXPOSURES I

DOSIMETRY B-72E9 QA & CAllBRATION TLDs B-Ott10 AGE-SPECIFIC METAB0LIC MODELS l

UNDES IMPROVED NEUTRON D0SIMETRY l

I IIEALTil EFFECTS B-3029 BIODOSIMETRY FOR DOSE RATE FACTORS B-3033 GENETIC a ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS UNDES NEUTRON RBE j

1

ROUTINE RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENTS SOURCE TERMS A-6075 TREATMENT SOURCE TERMS B-2231 DECONTAMINATION RADWASTE UNDES IMPROVED GALE CODE l

UNDES ASSESS ADVANCED TREATMENT PATilWAYS TO MAN AlHBUHtit A-6288 10 DINE PATilWAYS L10'UID B-7260 SUSQUEHANNA & CilESAPEAKE B-2271 NON-STREAM MODEL B-2275 RIVER FIELD DATA B-2295 RIVER-SEDIMENT MODEL i

.B-5749 DISTRIBUTION COEFFICIENTS IlEALTH EFFECTS A-2059 DEMPAK MODEL B-0188 B10 TRANSPORT MODELS j

DECOMMIS'S10NING B-2296 ACTIVATION PRODUCTS B-2299 CONTAMINATION FACTORS I

DECOMMISSIONING / DECONTAMINATION B-2303 UNDES IN PLANT EVALUATION

ACCIDENTAL RADIOLOGICAL RELEASES ACCIDENT SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, INCLUDING SOURCE TERM DEFINITION, TRANSPORT MODELING, i

AND CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT DONE BY PAS AND BRIEFED SEPARATELY.

SUPPORTING RESEARCH BY RSR AND SAFER:

4 SOURCE TERM RSRINPLANTPilEN0MENA 1

I TRANSPORT RSR METEOROLOGICAL AIRBORNE l

LIQUID SAFER IIEALTH EFFECTS SAFER B-2268 AND A1203 EARLY EFFECTS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS l

EMERGENCY RESPONSE RELEASE SOURCE TERMS RSR QUALIFICATION TESTING & SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METEOROLOGICAL MODELS RSR REAL-TIME MODELS TO BUIDE DECIS!nNMAKING ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORS SAFER PORTABLE 10 DINE INSTRUMENTS (B-6286, B-6237)

AND FIELD INSTALLATIONS WITH TELEMETERED DATA (UNDES)

COUNIER MEASURES PAS KI STUDIES (ALSO ASSISTANCE TO NRR) 4 POST ACCIDENT REC 0VERY NRR FORMULATING POLICY AND NEEDS 1

0 i

jg'p ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION RESEARCH PROGRA e-(0 80 KM)

DISTANCES (CALM 10 MPS)

UIND SPEEDS a;

ALL STABILITY CONDITIONS TERRAIN EFr:ECTS A.

1.

FLAT, EVEN ROUGH, HILLY 2.

COASTAL SHORELINE ENVIT0NMENT 3.

CHANNELED FLOW 4.

IMPINGEMENT 5.

MODEL EVALUATION B.

1.

TRANSPORT (TRAJECTORY)

(TURBULENCE) 2.

DI F FUSION 3.

DEPOSITION FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMPUTER CAPABILITY 4.

VERTICAL DISPERSION C.

BUILDING WAKE EFFECTS D.

S USED VERIFICATION OF CURRENT AND PROPO RBORNE TO PREDICT THE TRANSPORT AND DIFF OBJECTIVE:

ONSE AND RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS FOR EMERGENCY SITE EVALUATION PURPOSES

/

~

p APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF REAL-TIME ATN05PHERIC DI Identify atmospheric transport, diffusion, and deposition models appropriate 1.

to estimate concentration patterns of effluents to 80 km.

Gaussian (statistical)

Model charar_teristics :

a.

b.

K-theory c.

2nd-order closure Identify tracer concentration data sets from point sources with simultaneous 2.

meteorolo5 cal miasurerents taken out to 80 km.

i terrain and surface conditions a.

b.

atmospheric stability transition conditions c.

d.

wind fields Determine evaluation criteria by which to assess models identified in 1 usin 3.

data in 2.

downwind 1 hr. surface concentration patterns to 80 km a.

b.

cost / benefit real time capability c.

sensitivity of meteorological data input d.

~.

Evaluate models using 3 and data in 2.

4.

Models (not more than 6)

~

a.

b.

experiments (not more than 50)

In consultation with NRC determine performance criteria for meteorologic 5.

data needed, model output, and compatibility at plants.

Perform 1, 2, 3, and 4 with precipitation scavenging models.

6.

Evaluate minicomputer capabilities that currently exist which may be applicable 7.

or easily adaptable to on-site emergency planning and response functions.

l s

t I

i l

ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FIELD EXPERIMENT AT INDI AN POINT _

PROJECT DIRECTOR: ' Robert F. Abbey, Jr., NRC/RES FIELD DIRECTOR:.

C. Ray Dickson Air Resources Laboratory, NCAA ']

~

PARTICIPANTS:

NOAA/ARL SRI International Bi?+311e-Pacific Northwest Laboratories Consolidated Edison State of New York To obtain high quality tracer concentration and coincident meteorological data in order to verify and evaluate ARAC and OBJECTIVE:

other dispersion models.

TEST PERIOD:

Two weeks commencing May 1, 1981 TEST CHARACTERISTICS:

Gaseous tracers released either concurrently from two different locations or 2B21 consecutively to dis +,inguish between day and night releases (SF,

1.

6 4q n,,

50 km X 50 km square grid or'25 km X 70 km grid centered at Indian Point.

2.

200 portable samplers with four samples at each of 50 locations.

3.

Continuous releases for two weeks with samplers changed every six hours.

4.

5.

Radiosondes released every six hours.

Tetroons tracked by radar, released every three hours for trajectory l

6.

determination.

7.

6-8150 ft instrumented towers.

Pibal stations and radar for wind field definition.

8.

Mark IX mobile lidar system for concentration measurements in the vertical.

9.

10. Accustic sounder for stability and mixing height determinations.

11. Oil i'og and plume photography.

OTHER OPTIONS:

1.

ALPHA-1 airborne lidsr.

f 2.

Aircraft sampling.

l l

l...

.U...

' ~

~~

$ 30CK

$ 400K Utt114fng kn:wn atmosph:ric transport.

ELE dif fuslen, and deposillan models CONTRACTORS

-Time Dispersion Models ia appropriate to estirnate ccncentrat c Ns i

patterns of effluents to 80 km and Evaluattdn of Re er previously developed high quality trac N04A/Afr Resources 1.ab.

i concentration data sets, an object ve 690 ll be evaluation of selected mod?ls wiThis ev NOAA/ Atmospheric Trrbulence and Diffusion

.333 demonstrate the range of models performed.

l/

appilcable to different meteorologica Laboratory d

topographical regimes, identify neede Colorado State Unf v.

i tfes.

input data, and quantify model uncerta n i829 for Such an assessment will provide a basis Aeronautical Research selecting a given model for use in Associates of Princeton 5606 l effects emergency p'enning and environmenta t l releases resulting from postulated acciden a SRI International l ation of radioactive ef fluents for site eva u 6222 An evaluation of existingite dispersion Battelle - Pacific minicomputer capabilities for on-s purposes.

Northwest laboratories 2M*.

i Release modeling as well as the Atmospher cAd Ltt Cak Ridge National Lab, 0446 is being made.

ill be

$ 500

$ 7001 A continuous two week fleid program w btain high b

conducted at Indian Point, NY, to ots with 400 h

quality e.oncentration measuremen 50 km Intermediate Range Atmospheric fixed point samples located in a 20 km x NOAA/Afr Resources Lab.Transport Experiments will be made and used as data grid.

models. The 15690 atmospheric transport and diffusion SRI International ducted model evaluation effort will be conbjectively the 16222 independently in order to assess o Aeronautical Research i i g the performance of each model in pred ct n Associates of Princeton B6606 f the tracer.

maximum concentration and spread o l t d at Cak Ridge National Lab.

Zion. IL and Rancho Seco CA.

80446 1

TE SAFETY RESEARCil BRANCH / DIVISION OF REACTOR SAFETY RESEARCH Nh FY 1981 FY191}2, DESCRIPTION is CONTRACTOR TITLE

( too h

To quanti fy the spread of effluents T, rom

$ 300K

$ 5005 590 NOAA/Afr Resources Lab.

Dispersion in Shoreline Environments ground-level, point sources in shoreline environments during postulated accident 222 SRI International conditions, a fleid program has been C

initiated to obtain high quality concentrhtfen 081 Battelle-Pacific Northwest measurements under controlled conditions.

Laboratories Tests are planned for the TeFa% Gulf Coast, Florida Atlantic Coast, and tne shores 240 The Research Corporation of Lake Michigan. The measurements program

i

. of New England will utilize state-of-the-art tracer tech-nology and remote sensing techniques to

• determine the spread of the effluent in the horizontal and vertical, over ' water as well as over. land. The data thus collected will be used to evaluate existing and proposed models of dispersion during accident conditions in coastal zones, both for emergency planning and site evalu-ation purposes.

1 E

.