ML19330C646
ML19330C646 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Wolf Creek |
Issue date: | 08/06/1980 |
From: | Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
ISSUANCES-A, KMLNRC-019, NUDOCS 8008110124 | |
Download: ML19330C646 (800) | |
Text
!
}
l KANSAS GAS AND ELECTR}C COMPANY l
GLENN 4 40 ESTER w C & P4ES QE's?- g^Qgy Nuclear !
l August 6, 1980 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 KMLNRC-019 Re: Docket No. 50-482-A Ref: Letter of 7/8/80 from NRC to KG&E
Dear Mr. Denton:
This letter is in response to Mr. Darrel Nash's request in the referenced letter for additional antitrust in- '
formation from the Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit No. 1 Operating License Applicants.
Five copies of the documentation and additional discussions requested from Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company and Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. are enclosed for your information.
Yours very truly,
- f*l $'
c" = ""
Attachments 2997 3
/ .T
$0081IoiL- '
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS P00R QUALITY PAGES 201 N. Market - Wetnts, Kansas - Mad Aadress: PO. Box 206 o W.cnita. Kansas 67201 - Te% phone: Area Code (316) 261-6451
OATH OF AFFIRMATICN STATE OF KANSAS )
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
I, Glenn L. Koester, of lawful age, being duly sworn upon oath, do depose, state and affirm that I am Vice President - Nuclear of Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, that I have signed the foregoing letter of transmittal, know the contents thereof, and that all statements contained therein are true.
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY By__ /MS f) t'
'Glenn L.
~
Koester
' ,M Vice President - Nuclear W.B. Walker, Secretary STATE OF KANSAS )
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
BE IT REMEMBERED that on this h day of /f[d, before me, Evelyn L. Fry, a Notary, personally appeared p enn L. Koester, Vice President - Nuclear of Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, who is personally known to me and who executed the foregoing instrument, and he duly acknowledged the execution of the same for and on behalf of and as the act and deed of said corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the
,,,,,,pa,te and year above written.
f' %.,
- . a'cu r .
I
.~
. A>
Evelyn [. Fry, Not /
i,9 u.3 o .j -
' Cl;,
gjo5nission expires on August 15, 1981.
O g -
, - . , - ev - -- - , e- --- -,--
g.
RESPONSES TO THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN TIIE NRC's LETTER DATED JULY 8, 1980 FROM DARREL NASli TO KG&E DOCKET NO STN 50-482-A WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO 1 AUGUST 1980 KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGilT COMPANY KANSAS ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC
RESPOMSES TO THE REQUEST FOR ADDITOMAL -
'l INFORMATION CONTAINED IN TiiE NRC's LETTER DATED 1 July 8, ~1980 FROM -DARREL NASH TO- KG&E A. Introduction Information relevant to the operating license antitrust review of Wolf Creek Generating Station, Unit No 1 (WCGS) was provided by KG&E letter dated May 6, 1980 to Mr Harold Denton of the NRC. Additional information was requested for the antitrust review of WCGS by Mr Nash's letter of July 8, 1980 to KG&E. The numbering of items in this attachment corresponds to the numbering.of Mr Nash's letter.
B. Additional Information Requested of KG&E '
Please provide copies of correspondence and interoffice memoranda which relate to the following activities of KG&E:
Item 1 The approval of the 69 kv interconnection between KG&E and the City of Mulvane, Kansas.
Response
KG&E's. interconnection with the City of Mulvane, . Kansas was approved by the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) on October 10, 1973 and the Federal ' Power ' Commission on April 19, 1974. Copies of the correspondence-and approvals are attached as Exhibits B.1-1 through B.1-7.
Item 2 KG&E's decision to provide the Cities of Erie, Augusta, and Oxford, Kansas with their full wholesale requirements.
Response
The documentation describing the decision to supply the City of Erie, Kansas with its full wholesale requirements is provided as Exhibits B.2-1 through 1 B.2-30.
i
! The documentation describing the decision to supply the City of Augusta, Kansas
-with its partial electrical requirements is provided as Exhibits B.2-31 through B.2-44.
The documentation describing the decision to supply the City of Oxford,-
Kansas with its full wholesale requirements is provided as Exhibits B.2-45
- through B.2-58.
4 Copics of the agreements with the-City of Augusta and the City of. Oxford referred to in the above referenced correspondence are provided as Exhibits in Section D as examples of KG&E's wholesale requirements agreements.
f
9 Item 3-KG&E's decision to offer the Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy _ Agency and the Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency firm power, supplemental power service and' transmission service; and a' 5.5 percent ownership participation in Wolf Creek to the Northwest Kansas Municipal, Energy Agency.
Response
The correspondence with the Eastern Kansas. Municipal Energy ~ Agency concerning-their power supply feasibility study is attached as Exhibits B.3-1 through
- B.3-7.
+
The correspondence with the Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency con-cerning their power supply feasibility study is attached as Exhibits B.3-8 through B.3-15. A meeting has been established for August 22, 1980 for the Kansas Municipal Energy Agency.to discuss their feasibility study results with KG&E.
Item 4 KG&E's decision to wheel power and energy -tx) the City of Kansas City, Kansas from the Southwestern Power Administration.
Response
This arrangement has since been terminated by mutual agreement of the parties involved. Documentation concerning the involved parties' negotiations, schedule filings and approvals ~, and termination of this wheeling arrangement is attached as Exhibits B.4-1 through B.4-41.
Item 5 i
KG&E's purchase of the electric distribution system of the City of Kiowa, Kansas.
Response
The correspondence from the representative of the City of Kiowa,: Kansas.
and KG&E's response to that request are attached as Exhibits B.5-1 and B.5-2.
Item 6 KG&E's purchase of the electric distribution system of the City of Oswego, Kansas.
Response
The City of Oswego, Kansas' correspondence and KG&E's responses to the City's offer to sell its electric distribution system are attached as Exhibits B.6-1 through B.6-4. The City is presently receiving wholesale power from Kansas Power and Light Company under contract until May 1,1985 and KG&E cannot consider service to the City while that contract is in effect. No response has' been received from the City of Oswego concerning KG&E's April 9,1980 request for information.
- _. . - . -- . . - ~ . .~. _. . , . , , _-
4
' Item 7
' The proposed change by the City of Girard, Kansas from their present
- electric ' Interconnection Contract to an Agreement for . Wholesale Service from KG&E.
- Response The documenca' tion concerning KG&E discussions with the City of Girard, Kansas iis attached as Exhibits B.7-1 through B.7-17. For additional-information concerning KG&E and the City of Girard, see the response to Item 9 below.
Item 8 The request by the City of Winfield, Kansas. that KG&E submit of fers to serve the electric needs of the' city on _(1) a wholesale basis and (2)l a retail basis.
I' Response i - The documentation concerning KG&E discussions with the City of Winfield, Kansas is attached as Exhibits B.8-1 through B.8-6. For additional information concerning KG&E and the City of Winfield, see the- response to Item 9 below.
Item 9 KG&E's intention to terminate existing contracts with the cities of Burling ton, Girard, Wellington and Winfield.
Response
s Copies of KGGE's correspondence with these cities and press releases concerning the ucrmination notices are attached as Exhibits B.9-1 through B.9-12.
Ongoing discussions are being held with these and other Kansas generating municipalities concerning future contracts. The KG&E proposed Generating Municipal Electric Service Agreement (Exhibit D.1-ll) is to be discussed in a meeting with the municipalities on August 15, 1980.
Item 10 KG&E's response to the City of New Strawn, Kansas that it be served by KG&E.
Item 11 The relationship betwcon KG&E and the City of New Strawn and specifically (1) issues precipitating New Strawn's desire to of fer KG&E a franchise to
-provide electri c service to the city (2) the KCC's rationale for refusing l KG&E a certificate of convenience and authority to serve the city and (3)
New Strawn's current supplier of electric service.
4 m ~-7 Risponse Correspondence relating to these two requests is interrelated so the responses are combined here. Correspondence responsive to the above requests: is attached as Exhibits B lO-1 through B.10-44.
~
Voluminous Ladditional material concerning'this. subject is a matter of public-record in KCC, Coffey County (Kansas) District Court, Court of Appeals of the State of Kansas and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pro-ceedings.
The City of New Strawn has appealed to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kansas, the KCC and Coffey County District Court decisions disallowing KG&E: service to the citizens of New Strawn. That appeal is still pending before the Kansas court of Appeals.
Item 12 KG&E's purchase of facilities owned by th' e Butler Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Response
Correspondence relating to the City.of Rose Hill, Kansas annexing two areas.previously unincorporated and served by the Butler Rural Electric Cooperative and KG&E's purchase of the Cooperatives facilities is attached as Exhibits B.12-1 through B.12-47.
Item 13-KG&E's decision to appear before the City council of Arcadia, Kansas to explain procedures necessary to change from being served wholesale to retail.
Response
KG&E correspondence in 1974 and 1979 concerning the City of Arcadia, Kansas is attached as Exhibits B.13-1 and B.13-2. No further contact with the City has occurred.
Item 14 KG&E's response to tir. City of Udall, Kansas that it be furnished retail ,
service.
Response
KG&E correspondence in 1976 and 1977 concerning purchase of the City of Udall, Kansas electrical distribution system is attached as Exhibits B.14-1,through B.14-8. The City decided not to sell its system and re-jected KG&E's purchase offer.
Item 15 KG&E's response to requests by the Kansas Power and Light Company and the Twin . Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc that KG&E establish a delivery point
~
to serve the Cooperative.
Response
Correspondence with Kansas Power and Light Company and the Twin Valley.
Electric Cooperative concerning the subject delivery point isf attached '
as Exhibits B.15-1 through B.15-7. .The~ delivery point to the Cooperative 4 -was eventually established through Empire District Electric Company's system in early-1979.
Item 16 Please provide the names and addresses of the various cooperatives which have requested - either additional' delivery points and/or. additional load that may be required on existing delivery points.
Response
- The following.is a listing of the Cooperatives that have contacted KG&E:
The Ark Valley Electric Cooperative Association, Inc Delbert Tyler, Manager P O Box 1246 South - llutchinson, Kansas 67501 The Butler Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc Wilson M Dickson, Manager P.O Box 1242 El Dorado, Kansas 67042 The Cancy Valley Electric Cooperative Association, Inc
~
Robert L Brown, Manager P O Box 308 Cedar Vale, Kansas 67024 Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc Lyle lierriott, Manager P O Box 229 Burling ton, Kansas 66839 The Radiant Electric Cooperative, Inc flowared L Sell, Manager P O. Box 390 Fredonia, Kansas 66736 The Sedgwick County Electric Cooperative Association, Inc Jack.S liutchinson, Manager P O Box 220' Cheney, Kansas 67025 The Sekan Electric Cooperative Association, Inc John Frerichs, Manager P O Box 40 Girard, Kansas . .66743 Sumner-Cowley Electric Cooperative, Inc Garland Price, Manager P O Box 220 Wellington, Kansas 67152 a,
United Electric Cooperative, Inc Wesley R Clendenen, Manager P O Box 326 Iola, Kansas 66749 i
I
_6_
_ _ _ _ - ~ - , -
C .' Additional Informa't ion Requested of KCPL 4
A significant[ document search has undertaken beginning immediately upon
' request with the attached results. Should additional relevant documents be found that.are considered responsive to NRC's inquiry, they will be provided, but the' attached information i= provided now to facilitate the review by the' Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
~
We also need -copies of correspondence and interof fice memoranda pertaining to activities of Kansas City Power & Light Company as follows:
Item 1 The purcliase by KCPL of the City of Armstrong's electric distribution system.
Response-The correspondence relating to Applicant KCPL's purchase of the City of Armstrong, Missouri distribution system is attached as Exhibits C.1-1 through C.1-13.
Item 2 KCPL's service to the City ~ of Osawatomie and Baldwin City, Kansas at J.
. wholesale.
Response
It is assumed that the request for information on service to Osawatomie and Baldwin City "at ' wholesale" is intended to obtain more. information related to the response previously supplied under Regulatory Guide 9.3 B.l.f. .
(1) transmitted to you May 6,1980. In that response, it was indicated that osawatomie and Baldwin City are "new partial bulk power supply customers".
Both cities have firm power service available under their Municipal .
Participation Agreements and have requested such service from Applicant KCPL to satisfy partical city reqdirements. Generally, the request for service i
is verbal, and KCPL then confirms the reservation in writing. Attached find correspondence relating to the firm power reservations by the cities ~
as Exhibits C.2-1 through C.2-15. Also attached for Baldwin City is the documentation leading up to the execution of the Municipal Participation Agreement. The correspondence relating to the Osawatomic contract was previously supplied under this docket in the original antitrust review prior to.the issuance of'the construction permit.
1 Item 3 KCPL's deletion of Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc as a wholesale 3
customer.
Response
Associated Electric Cooperative (AEC) is a large generation and transmission cooperative covering the entire State of Missouri. Applicant KCPL had for years served at wholesale a portion of one of AEC's distribution cooperatives that is isolated from AEC's transmission system. Because of KCPL's rising
' wholesale rate levels, AEC chose to begin serving the cooperative with 'its own generation and utilize KCPL for transmission service only. Correspondence
- relating to 'this change is attached as Exhibits C.3-1 through C.3-4.
- 7. -
. . .- . . ~ . _ _ , _ . .
Item 4 KCPL's decision to of fer the City of Ottawa, Kansas a Municipal Participation Agreement replacement for Rate Schedule FPC no 70.
(Please provide this new agreement.)
Response ~
Little documentation exists for the decision to offer Ottawa, Kansas a Municipal Participation Agreement-(MPA).
As stated below in Section D, Applicant KCPL has three basicLtypes-of contract. Ottawa, a generating municipal, is the same class. of 1 customer as Osawatomie, Garnett and other generating municipals.
Ottawa intends to continue generating che bulk of its own requirements and rely on KCPL for supplemental services. Tggrefore, the MPA was offered as the appropriate contract. Correspondence relating to the Ottawa MPA is attached as Exhibits C.4-1 through C.4-6.
Virtually identical contracts have been entered into since 1975 with the-cities of Osawatomie, Garnett and Baldwin City, in Kansas, and the cities of Carrollton and Marshall in Missouri.
Item 5 KCPL's decision to provide transmission services for the following cities:
Garnett, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas City, Kansas Independence, Missouri Higginsville, Missouri
Response
The cities of Garnett and Osawatomie, Kansas and Independence, Missouri re-quested that Applicant KCPL provide transmission service' between the re-
~
spective cities and the City of Kansas City, Kansas so that the cities could purchase non-firm power and energy from Kansas City, Kansas. The Cities of Higgini.ville, Missouri and Kansas City, Kansas requested that-Applicant provide transission service so that the cities could receive SouthwesternPower Administration hydroelectric power and energy to which they were entitled. In all cases, Applicant has agreed to provide trans-mission servi..e. Correspondence is attached as Exhibits C.5-1 through C.5-30.
Also attached as Exhibits C.5-31 and C.5-32 are copies of the Proposed Conditions signed by KCPL prior to issuance of the construction permit under this docket, in which KCPL agrees to provide transmission service.
Transmission service schedules are in ef fect for the named cities with the exception of Higginsville. The Higginsville contractual arrangpments are under review by the city in draft form. Execution is expected to take place within the next month.
- m. ,
Item 6 KCPL's response to the Kansas Municipal Energy Agency's request for owner-ship participation, firm power, supplemental power services, and trans-mission services.
_ Response Attached as Exhibits C.6-1 through C.6-20 is the correspondence with the Kansas Municipal Energy Agency (KMEA). KMEA was recently formed by merger of the Northwest Kansas Agency and elements of the Eastern Kansas Agency.
i e
~
D. Additional Information Requested of the Applicants Item 1 In addition, please provide copies of contracts, agreements and rate schedules (not previously provided) ~ which are representative of the range of wholesale and coordination services Applicants offer to current and future wholesale customers (i.e., full requirements, partial require-ments, transmission services, interconnection agreements, etc) . . If.these documents have not been finalized, please provide a copy of the latest available draft.
KG&E Response Documents representative of the range of KG&E's wholesale and coordination services are attached as Exhibits D.1-1 through D.1-11. The specific examples-provided are:
Rural Electric Cooperatives Customers Exhibit D.1 Agreement between KG&E and Butler Rural Electric Coop Assn Inc
' Exhibit D.1 Rate Schedule REC-97, and FAREC-979 Full Requirements Customers Exhibit D.1 Agreement between KG&E and City of Oxford, Kansas
. Exhibit D.1-4 - PWM-575 and FACR Exhibit D.1-5 - PWM-780 and FAPWM-780 (Compliance filing in Docket' No ER77-578, pending with FERC)
Exhibit D.1-6 - PWM-580 and FAPWM-580 (Proposed in Docket No ER80-259)
Partial Requirements Customers Exhibit D.1-7 - Electric .nterconnection Agreement and Service Schedules A, B and C between KG&E and City of Augusta, Kansas -
Exhibit D.1-8 - Amendment No 3 to Electric Interconnection Agreement - City-of Coffeyville, Kansas Exhibit D.1-9 - Amendment ho 2 to Electric Interconnection Agreement - City of Augusta, Kansas Amendment No 4 to Electric Interconnection Agreement - City of Coffeyville, Kansas (Compliance filing 'in Docket No ER77-578, pending with FERC)
~
Exhibit D.1-lO - Amendment No 3 to Electric Interconnection Agreement - City of Augusta, Kansas
- . Amendment No 5-to Electric Interconnection Agreement - City
- ' of Coffeyville, Kansas (Proposed in Docket No ER80-259) l Exhibit. D.1-ll - The latest draf t of the proposed interconnection agreement that will be presented to the Cities in a meeting on August 15, 1980. .
1:
.s KCPL Response Applicant KCPL has three types of agreements that are representative of wholesale and coordination services offered to wholesale customers.
.a. Wholesale Firm Power Contract (attached hereto as Exhibit D.2-1) for total requirements customers that have litt.'.e or no generation of their own.
- b. Transmission Service Agreement (attached to Exhibit C.3-4) for a customer that requests only transmission service.
- c. Municipal Participation Agreement (attached to Exhibit C.4-6) for generating customers that request a variety of services such as economy, emergency, reserve sharing and transmission. The fact that the cities are generating municipals that operate on a firm basis entitles them to the benefits of this type of wide range coordinating agreement.
Item 2 In response to Question 1.b there is no discussion of the manual broker-age scheme which was recently instituted among "Mo-Kan" operating systems.
Information related to KCPL and KG&E's perception of the potential effects of this scheme on Applicant's operating practices would be useful in this antitrust review.
General Response KG&E and KCPL each participate in the manual brokerage scheme which was instituted among MOKAN member systems in March 1980. The brokerage scheme provides information to each company each hour regarding the opportunties for short-term economy purchases and sales between member systems.
KG&E Response For many years KG&E has maintained close contact with each neighboring system and has exchanged system information on an hour-by-hour basis.
Through these exchanges of information, KG&E has bought and sold con-siderable amounts of energy as a means of minbnizing systen costs. As an example, in 1979 KG&E bought 416 GWH for its own use and sold 404 GWH from its own generation. Each of these amounts are for hour-by-hour transactions, but do not include an additional 796 GWH which were bought and then resold to third parties, again on an hour-by-hour basis.
These amounts of energy compare to KG&E's 1979 total system load of 7,189 GWH.
Long before the initiation of the brokerage system the planning and operating practices of KG&E were already based on extensive use of energy purchases and sales to improve economies of operation. The brokerage system referred to herein should not be considered as a new method of operation, but as a refinement in the method of exchanging information regarding the opportunities for economy interchange. For this reason, KG&E does not believe the manual brokerage scheme as recently instituted will cause any significant changes in their operating practices.
-r, : .
ee.
KCPL' Response:
The MOKAN_ economy brokerage'syctem that was-recently implemented is primarily-a means of formalizing what KCPL' has always done. KCPL has-
.in past years dealt. in economic transactions with other systems. The_.
brokerage system is certainly a refinement for record keeping purposes and it also' af fords an opportunity to effect the relatively minor hourly transactions that may have previously been~ overlooked.
. Item 3 In addition, please provide more specific information, if~available, on-how KEPCo plans to meet its lead requirements before and af ter WCGS is.
on line.
Responso KEPCo's plans for meeting its~ load requirements before and after WCGS is on line have not changed from that 'previously filed. -Supplemental power and energy that KEPCo will . require to supply its members needs beyond that supplied by WCGS'and hydroelectric power from the Southwestern Power Administration will be purchased by KEPCo from the overlying investor owned utilities that currently. sell power to KEPCo's members.
For additional discussion, see Mr Glenn L Koester's -letter of September 11, 1979 to Mr Argil Toalston of the NRC which^ supplied the Appendix L responses for KEPCo in conjunction with our construction permit amendment application to allow KEPCo ownership of WCGS.
-1
- M m re. D:nnis Ei ns (2) B.1-1 G. W.-Ev / Ralph Fisbach E. S. Halt
~
KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY Jack Skelton
- n' cam a-aw - R. E. Tate /M. Shank F. -M. Kimball/ Wilson Cadman
......uc, October 3, 1973 Bernard Ruddick
.................u.. H. K. Tatum/N. F. Pinkstaff n, E. Phillips 6 portant' Document File Mr. Fred B. Adam Acting Director Utilities Divi on State Corpora on Commission 4th Floor St te Office Building Topeka, Ka as 66612 **
Electric Interconnection Agreement with the City of Mulvane, Kansas dated March 12, 1973 including Service Schedules A, B and C and separate Letter of Understanding . -
INITIAL FILING
Dear Mr. Adam:
In accordance with the Commission's Docket No. 39524U, we enclose fcur copies'of the captioned documents which were effective June 1, 1973. ~
Monthly rates for the payment of service under Service Sche (ules A, B and C are the same as those in comparabic service schedules with other municipalities having electric generating plants which are Burlington, Chanute, Coffeyville, Fredonia, Girard, Iola, Neodesha, Wellington and Winfield.
Although this contract was effective June 1,1973, due to construction the actual interconnection may not be closed for some time.
Please return one copy of the documents showing the Commission's filing data.
Very tru yours,
)e Bill Whitmer Administrative Accountant W3W:BW:cid Attach.
20! N. llarket - Wichita. Kansas - Mail Address: P. O. Box 208 / Wichita, Kansas 67201 - ;..snme- Area Code (316) 264-1111
i B.1-2
.*e e l . .
anJaJ sjg,'
fa$e of &
Cf."*pr h Q$9 OlNHtI6350n ROBER1 E. DOCKING Governor Off0tQ On DALE E. $AFFELS Cheirman Fourth Floor, State Office Bldg.
JUlt$ V. DOilf Commissione, VERNON A. STROBERO Commissione' TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612 DAROLD D. MAlH Secretary JAMi$ E. WELLS Gen. Counsel.
Utilities Division October 11, 1973 In the matter of Kansas Gas & Electric Company )
initial filing an Electric Interconnection )
Agree.1ent, dated March 12, 1973 with the City ) 73U228 of Mulvane, Kansas and a separate Letter of )
Understanding, effective June 1, 1973. )
Mr. Bill Whitmer, Administrative Accountant Kansas Gas and Elect 7'_2 Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
Dear Mr. Whitmer:
We are enclosing two copies each of an Electric Interconnection Agreement, dated March 12, 1973 and a Letter of Understanding dated Septenber 5, 1972 approved by the Commission on October 10, 1973 under 73U228.
Yours truly, l WM l ', s gl L,
'd,B N Act ng Director NWS:ch Enc.
l ire
K E Ft GMIA g g ELECTRIC INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT
, BETWEEN THE CITY OF HULVAME, KANSAS AND KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THIS AGREEMENr. made this March 12, 1973 by and between the City of hivase, Kansas , hereinafter referred to as " City",
and Kansas Gas and Electric Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as
" Company".
WITNESSETH, That, WHEREAS, both parties own and operate facilities for the generation and distribution of electric energy to the consuming public in the State of Kansas; and WHEREAS, the Company owns suitable transmission f acilities in the area adjacent to the generating municipality and said facilities can be inter-connected with the City's facilities for the purpose of interchange of electric power and energy; and WHEREAS, the City is desirous of obtaining a means by which electric
{ power and energy may be interchanged from time to time with the Company and with other generating municipalities located in the Company's service area who have a similar Electric Interconnection Agreement with the Company; and l
WHEREAS, the parties hereto can realize substantial benefits and improve reliability to their customers by the transmission and interchange of electric power and energy through the maintenance of an interconnection.
U2 b NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of M pYenhAiu%W6:he APPROVEB . 0 C.T_ .10_19Z3_
TEE STATE CORPORATION COMM3SSGN' OT KAftSAS B1 Y -
laa rt, MM
n O
covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties contract and agree as follows:
ARTICLE I FACILITIES TO BE PROVIDED (1) The Company agrees to provide and maintain at its expense:
(a) 69 kv tap (s) at mutually agreed upon locations on the Company's 69 kv transmission system, known as the City's point (s) of interconnection. Such point (s) of inter-connection to be suitable and adequate for the services made available under this Agreement.
(b) Suitable metering equipment by which flow of power and energy into or out of the interconnection may be con-tinuously measured.
(c') Transmission facilities consisting of transmission lines of 69 kv and higher interconnecting the City's facilities with the Company's generating facilities.
(d) Sectionalizing switches in the Company's transmission line, provided the City does not elect to have super-visory or automatic control of sectionalizing at the
! point (s) of interconnection.
(e) Use of the metering equipment set out in Paragraph 1(b) for the City's load control system, if compatible and i
l it does not adversely affect Company's metering.
l (2) The City agrees to provide and maintain at its expense:
l (a) The 69 kv transmission line(s) connecting the City's distribution system to the point (s) of intarenana-H aa 73U228 on Company's transmission system. Specifi :IdToEs~of 0CT 1019N-APPROVED N
TEE STATE CORPORATION COM '
l or MANSAS g 3
such line(s) to conform to Company's Construction Standards then in effect, or as mutually agreed.
(b) A disconnecting switch or breaker in the City's trans-mission line within one span of the tap. Specification of such device to conform to Company's Construction Standards then in effect, or as mutually agreed.
(c) 69 kv breaker (s) and necessary relaying in City's 69 kv line(s) if more than one mile in length.
(d) Adequate and suitable stepdown transformation which provides a source of ground fault current on 69 kv side.
(e) Protective switching and relaying equipment to permit interconnected operation with the Company's system and to protect City's generating equipment.
(f) Suitable meteting and load control equipment whereby the City can observe and maintain the " scheduled net flow ' into and out of Company's system.
" Scheduled net flow" means the algebraic sum of the simultaneous deliveries and receipts by the City.
j l
This provision is required to facilitate the exchange of powe. among the interconnected participating commission File Number ._ 7 3 U 2 2 8 municipalities and the Company, OCT 101973 APPROVEB .
THE STATE CORPORATION COM M l ARTICLE 11 or KA SAS 4 - h----- ------ M ff5c-/
--- - Sarrvery SERVICE TO BE RENDERED l
The Company agrees that by and through the facilities described in Article I, it will provide an interconnection through which the services set t It is recognized I out in the Service Schedules attached hereto will be provided.
- - - - - - - - _ _ ___ ,_ __ ""'7 w-- --_-.,_y ._ _ _ _ ,
.L ' ' e g that the terms and rates applicable to such services must necessarily depend upon the conditions from time to time existing. Such Service Schedules, when executed by the parties hereto, shall become part of this Agreement for the !
periods specified therein. l I
ARTICLE III SERVICE CONDITIONS The systems of the parties are capable of being electrically inter-Derby connected at a point (s) near KG&E's El Paso Substation near , Kansas.
Interchange of power and energy will be at approximately 69 kv unless otherwise agreed.
Except as otherwise from time to time agreed upon between the parties, neither party shall be obligated to carry abnormal reactive current for the other party when to do so in the sole judgment of the party adversely affected would interf ere with or limit the operation of its system.
It is understood that the Company, because of its interconnected operations, has no practical control over the flow of power through the City's interconnection. Responsibility for flow of power over the interconnection will rest entirely with the City.
Unintentional interchenge between the systems of the parties resulting from the operation of such systems electrically interconnected shall, insofar as practicable, be kept in balance. Any imbalance at the end of each hourly period shall be carried forward for balancing during a subsequent period, provided that balancing off shall be made during a period or periods of similar l system conditions to the period during which the unintentional interchange occurred.
This interconnection will be operated normally closed during the term of this Agreement whether or not power is' aeggh)fpggvered, e7co3pH 2 2 S APPROVED - k-I-. .h I--
TsE STATr. CORPoR ATION COMMISSI By . Md PF
~
g ,
1 under such conditions that the service continuity of either prty would be adversely af fected.-
The Company ia a member of the South Central Systems of North American Power Systems Interconnection Consmittee (NAPSIC). The Operating Committee of the South Central Systems of NAPSIC has specified and will, from time to time in the future, specify and change operating requirements with respect to inter-connected system operation, including spinning reserves, time and frequency control, area emergency supply, e . The Company is also a member of the South-west Power Pool (SWPP), the area coordinating group for the National Electric l
l Reliability Council (NERC) . As a part of the obligations imposed by force of l
this Agreement, the burden of the City in meeting these standards and require-I ments is hereby imposed upon the Company.
The City shall maintain Adequate Reserve Capacity which shall be equal to twenty-five (25) percent or more reserve above the City's Annual Peak Load, met either by installed generating capacity or by contract for purchase of Firm Power under this Agreement, or by Firm Power obtained from other partici-l pa. ting generating municipalities located in the Company's service area, or by any combination thereof. Annual Peak Load is considered to be the maximum clock-hour demand occurring in the current, month or in any of the preceding eleven (11) months. Installed generating capacity shall be the demonstrated four-hour plant capability at the conditi'ons of annual peak. Such capability shall be determined jointly by both parties at the effective date of the Agreement and thereafter at the request of either' party whenever any substantial change is believed to have occurred.
The City retains the right to install or not to install additional generating capacity, or to purchase capacity from the Company or from another generating municipality having an Interconnect $on' Commineinn Agreement w nh the Cu- w yb b 2 b File Number . .
in order to maintain Adequate Reserve Capacity. APPROVED OCT 101973 THE STATE CORPORATION COMMIS OT EANSAS By h esery
& (
1 Maintenance of Adequate Reserve Capacity as set out in this Agreement entitles the City tothe services provided under the Service Schedules attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement.
ARTICLE IV METERING Hetering facilities for the interconnection described in' Article I will be owned and installed by the Company at Mulvano ,
Kans'as in space which the City will provide.
The City shall have the right to install metering equipment for the purpose of checking the meters installed by the Company.
The amounts of power and energy supplied and received hereunder shall be determined from measurements taken by the metering facilities provided by the Company, or, at the Company's option, by 69 kv metering at the point of interconnection.
Metering equipment shall be tested by the Owner at intervals of not to exceed one year. The accuracy of registration shall be maintained in accord-ance with good practices. On request of the City, special tests shall be made.
If any special meter test discloses the metering device to be registering out-side acceptable limits of accuracy (2% above or below comparisons with calibrated standards), then the Company shall bear the expense thereof; otherwise, the expense of such test shall be borne by the City. Representatives of the City shall be afforded the opportunity to be present at all routine or special tests and upon occasions when any readings for purposes of settlements here-under are taken.
If any test discloses that inaccuracy is greater than said acceptable i
limits, the account between the parties hereto shall be adjusted to correct for YdOZZD the full percentage of inaccuracy. Such adjustmentacwheti4 bed t dlidebtror - - '----
APPROVEB ----- 0.RJ_10 1973 TEE STATE CORPORATION COM88 OT.KA AS e
, -6 ar _ . _. f 6._____-_....___ &**ter
- 9 @
period of ninety (90) days prior to the date of the test or to the period during which such inaccuracy may be determined to have existed, whichever period is the shorter. If any metering equipment at any time fails to register, or if the registration thereof be so erratic as to be meaningless, the power and energy delivered shall be determined from the best available data.
In addition to meter rec 6rds, the City shall keep such log sheets and other suppicmental records as may be needed to afford a history of the amounts of power and energy involved in transactions hereunder. The originals of all of such meter records and other records shall be open to inspection by repre-sentatives of the Company.
As promptly as practicable after the 26th cf each calendar month, the Company will render to the City a statement showing the computation and total amounts due under the Service Schedules currently applicable.
ARTICLE V BILLINGS AND PAYMENTS The normal billing period for the purposes of settlements hereunder shall be from the twenty-seventh (27th) day of the calendar month through the twenty-sixth (26th) day of the following calendar month, both dates inclusive.
All bills shall be due on the 15th day following the close of the billing period to which such bills are applicable or on the 10th day following receipt of bill, whichever is the later.
l ARTICLE VI LIABILITY Each party shall defend, indemnify and save the other harmless from liability, loss, cost and expenses for all injuries to persons, including death, and all damages to or destruction of property, arising out of, or caused by.
comiwon vu m,*, _-._.
730228 w raovco - 99I.1S3A?l-l THE STATE CORPORATION COM or KAW8AS b seter sy
- : h h the sole negligence of its agents, servants and employees which may arise in connection with the ' performance of this Agreement. However, each party shall defend, indemnify and save harmless the other party to the full extent of its subrogation rights against liabilities, loss, costs and expenses resulting from injury to or death of its own employees.
ARTICIE VII
^
~
UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES Neither party shall be considered to be in default in respect to supply of power or reactive kilovolt-amperes hereunder if prevented from ful-filling auch obligation by reason of unconttollable forces. The term "uncontroll-able forces" shall be deemed for the purposes hereof to include among others such causes as storm, flood, lightning, earthquake, fire, explosion, failure of or accidental damage to apparatus or equipment resulting in loss of use thereof for a period of thirty (30) days or less, failure of manufacturers to make scheduled deliveries of equipment, act of the public enemy, sabotage, civil disturbance, labor disturbance, strike, impact of war or mobilization, national emergency, order by court or by public authority, environmental con-siderations, limitations or prohibitions, or other causes beyond the control of the party affected, which such party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid by exercise of due diligence and foresight and by provision of reserve facilities in accordance with good practice. Either party unable to fulfill any obligation by reason of uncontrollable forces shall exercise due diligence dianarch-to remove such disability, if practicable, with vamannabla Commisetan File Number ..
OCT 101973 ARTICE VIII APPROVED THE STATE CORPORADON CO O KAN S TERMINATION ON DEFAULT ~
l MegA d*7Le /
Should either of the parties hereto vioNE~e~dAYTnafirlaT 666ViiTon of this Agreement, the other, party may terminate this Agreement by giving
.. , g Q thirty (30) days' prior written notice of its intention to do so, but any other remedy or remedies, available under the law, for such violation shall not be limited in any way because of this provision or the exercise of the right confstred hereunder.
ARTICLE IX WAIVERS Any waiver at any time by either party of its right with respect to a default under this Agreement, or with respect to any other matter arising in connection with this Agreement, shall not be decaed a waiver with respect to any subsequent default or matter. Any delay short of the statutory period of limitation in asserting or enforcing any right shall not be deemed a waiver of such right.
ARTICLE X COMMISSION AND OTHER APPROVAL This Agreement and all obligations hereunder are subordinate to, subject to and conditioned upon the valid orders (including but not necessarily limited to orders fixing or approving rates and/or standards and conditions of service) of, and the granting of approval and authorization by any Commission or other regulatory body having rate making and/or other juris-diction or whose approval or authorization may be napired bv law includina
""""i"
- N"b' ~~
any judicial review thereof. 9.h.I.3.9 E APPROVED ARTICLE XI Tile STATE CORPORATION CO w l
TERM B7 ...............___. - enry l
This Agreement shall become effective as of 1, . 1, ion and shall continue in full force and effect thereafter until terminated as herein provided. Notice to terminate by either party shall be given in writing at least thirty (30) months prior to the date of termination provided that such
s 9 termination shall not become effective during the initial twenty (20 ) years of this Agreement.
This Agreement shall supersede any and all prior agreements either written or oral between the parties hereto for the service herein contemplated.
It shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the. respective parties.
IN WITNESS WHE,REOF, the, parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers, as of the day and year first hereinbefore written.
CITY OF MULVANE , KANSAS By M A & s* W Mayor ATTES :
0$a.5$W
/ C'ity/C[erk o' o
'SdL
[. G) '.
-fl' KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
.. . , _ , {
\
- \, ,'s i 3y _
/ ( -
, / b ATTEST:
,, jy i Secretary I
SEAL l
Comminaion File Number _.
APPrtovce . 9.CT 101973 THE STATE CORPORAT1oM COM OF MANSAS
- ~
Service Schedule A Firm Power Service This Service Schedule A is agreed to be ef fective on June 1 ,
19 n, and as a part of and under that certain Electric Interconnection Agreement dated March 12 , 1973 , between the City cf w,,1v3n , , Kansas, and Kansas Gas and Electric Comp,any.
It shall apply to said parties for the purposes and in the manner as set forth in this Service Schedule A.
Section 1 - Firm Power Service Firm Power Service as used herein shall mean electric power and accompanying energy made available by one party (Seller) to the other party (Buyer) on an advanced basis to maintain the required Adequate Reserve Capacity. Quantities of such power and energy to be made available, and the period of time that such power and energy is to be made available, and any other special conditions, shall be by mutual agreement.
Such agreement between Seller and Buyer shall be evidenced by a Letter of Intent signed by both parties specifying the essential details of such Agreement. Buyer will normally furnish Sellsr an advance daily schedule of energy to be delivered hereunder.
Section 2 - Availability Firm Power Service is available to the Buyer whenever the Seller has an excess obove its required generating reserve. If the Company does not have excess Firm Power available, it will endeavor to purchase Firm Power I
l from other interconnected sources. Coramiaah rite Number 7 3 U_2 2 8 APPROVEB 0CT 1 0 1973 A,1 TEE STATr CORPORATION COMQM, or KAFSAS By MWA ' h &"
- ., _ _ , - . _ . ~ _ _ _ _ , - - _ . . _ . . _ _ , . , - - . _ _ _
9 . q Section 3 - Payment for Firm Power Service The Buyer shall compensate Seller for such service at the following monthly rate:
$1.725 per Kw of Firm Power of Billing Demand, plus 4.5 Mills per Kwh, if supplied from Seller's system, for all energy delivered hereunder; or Cost of procurement, plus 0.6 mill per Kwh.
Billing Demand shall mean the maximum amount of power expressed in kilofatts which Seller agrees to furnish and which Buyer agrees to pay for in accordance with Section 1 above, subject to the provisions of Section 4 hereof.
In the event it becomes necessary to calculate Billing Demand under this Schedule, the term "kw" shall mean "kwh per clock hour".
Fuel Adjustment Minus or plus 0.0109C per Kwh for each 10 or fraction thereof by which the average cost per million Btu of fossil fuels used at the Company's electric generatin;; stations during the next preceding month is less than, or l
exceeds 24c per million Btu. The factor will be determined by multiplying the increase above 24c or the decrease below 24c by 0.0109c and by the ratio of net kilowatt-15ours generated by fossil fuels to net kilowatt-hours gener-ated and purchased in that month. Such average costs determined in accordance with the Federal Power Commission's Uniform Systra of Accounts, will be as shown by the Company's books including transportation equipt:ent costs to unloading point.
Commiselon File Number ..._7 3 U 2 2 8 Aeenovra 0.c.T..1.0.J.973 A-2 THE STATE CORPORATION COhlMISSI Br b. W
.. 4 m%
Tax Adjustment When any city, town or taxing authority imposes a franchise, occupation, gross receipts, business, sales, license, excise, privilege or similar tax upon the electrical operations of this Company within said city, town or taxing authority boundary, the amount thereof shall be charged to each customer within said city, town or taxing authority boundary, in the ,
same form in which it is imposed on the Company. All such taxes so imposed on this Company shall be added as a separate charge to customer's bill for electric service. Any particular class of customer exempted from said tax by said city, town or taxing authority in the calculation of said tax upon the Company shall be exempt from the adder contemplated herein.
Section 4 - Billing Demand Adjustments Within Contract Period The billing demand for Firm Power Purchases under this Agreement shall be subject to the following adjustments:
I (a) In the event,the Company is unable to furnish the full capacity contracted for when so reasonably requested by Buyer (uncontrollable conditions excepted), the contract billing l
i dcaand shall be adjusted downward to the maximum power l
actually supplied. Such downward adjustment shall be made l
1 effective from the date Seller is so unable to furnish such full capacity and extending to the end of the firm power l
period as'specified in the Letter of Intent.
(b) In the event the City requires Firm Power capacity in an amount exceeding the contract billing demand and to fulfill its firm power requirements and the Company provides such Comminion File Nember .73U228 APPROvra O CT.1.0 1973.
Ae3 THE STATE CO'RPORATION COMMISSI ,
Of KANSAS <
By Y %_
g g capacity, the contract billing demand shall be adjusted upward by the amount of such increase. Buyer agrees to confirm such adjustment by issuing a supplementary Letter of Intent for the amount of the excess, which'shall be effective as to such excess from the date such excess capacity is supplied and extending for twelve (12) mon,ths thereafter. If Seller is not agreeable to providing such additional capacity for the said period, Buyer shall pay for the excess capacity only for the billing month in which the excess was taken.
The demand of Buyer in excess of the billing demand shall be exempt from this adjustment if such excess is caused by an emergency, and the Seller agrees to sell and deliver the same under Service Schedule B hereof. In that event, it shall be billed under the provisions of the Schedule for Emergency Power then in effect.
Commission Mie Number % 7 S II 9 9 @
A-4 APPROVED 0.0.I.1.0E1
'TRE STATE CORPoRAr10N COMuqa Of NANSAS By- b [*pt - Sarnaery
g e Section 5 - Term This Service Schedule A shall become effective concurrently with the Electric Interconnection Agreement dated March 12 ,
19_73_, of which this Service Schedule A is a part, and shall continue in effect for so long as said Electric Interconnection Agreement, or any extension thereof, remains in force and effect. .
Executed as of the date first hereinabove written.
CITY OF /N e , KANSAS ATTEST:
e By MY d Y "
n/ f / h ) ,vf D
{fCity. Clerk SEAL KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTEST:
b By / *. l
,y ed f Secretary SEAL CommiAn File Numter -
APPROVCD A-5 Tac sTArc couroRATION CO or vsAs
,, )sstA.-_} lk.--.
.:. - e Q.
Service Schedule B I
Emergency Power This Service Schedule B is agreed to be effective on June 1 ,
19 73 , and as a part of and under that certain Electric Interconnection Agreement 1
r March 12 ,19 73 , between the City of Mulvane ,
dated I Kansas, and Kansas Gas and Electric Company. It shall apply to the said parties for the purpeses and in the manner.as set forth in this Service Schedule B.
Section 1 - Emergency Service Emergency Service for the purposes of this Service Schedule B shall mean electric power and energy supplied by one party to the other under emer-8ency conditions such that the other party is temporarily unable to obtain the It is further power and energy from chen current sources normally available.
agreed that a condition of deficiency in power supply occasioned by shortage of dependable generating capacity to meet load requirements, including adequate reserve, or shortage of water, fuel or other such supplies, which by reasonable planning and foresight by the party affected could have been avoided, shall not be considered as an emergency condition.
Section 2 - Availability Emergency power is available to the City under this Service Schedule B, provided the City has Adequate Reserve Capacity as defined in the Electric Interconnection Agreement of which this Service Schedule B is a part.
When either party, in an emergency, shall require power and energy which the other is in a position to furnish, and a request is made by the party desiring emergency service from the other, and an agreement is reached as to Commiacion M Number 79U99@
APPROVEB ...ML10jEl THE STATE CORPORATION CO N or x a B-1 sy
- W6b M,,
s o l l
the amount of power and energy which can be delivered by Seller and the duration
\
of such delivery, then Seller shall furnish the requested Emergency Service from any available source to the extent that, in the judgment of Seller, the generation or purchase and the delivery of such energy will not impair or !
)
jeopardize service in the system of Seller.
It is understood and agreed that the energy taken by one party from the other due to emergency conditions when the period of such taking af energy
~
is less than thirty (30) minutes shall be classified as unintentional inter-change and shall be treated as set forth in Article III of the Electric Interconnection Agreement dated March 12 , 19 73 , of which this Service Schedule B is a part. If the taking hereunder of energy during an emergency shall be for a period of thirty (30) minutes or more, all of the energy taken during i.he emergency shall be treated as Emergency Service, as provided for under this Service Schedule B.
It is understood and agreed that if an emergency is of such duration that Emergency Service hereunder for such emergency is rendered for more than one twenty-four (24) hour period counted from the beginning of such Emergency Service, the taking of Emergency Service hereunder for such emergency within each twenty-four (24) hour period af ter the first twenty-four (24) hour period shall be at a load factor of not less than 30% daily load factor. For the purpose of calculation of kw demand under this Schedule, the term "kw" shall mean "kwh per hour".
Section 3 - Payment for Emergency Service For Emergency Service supplied as provided in Section 1, Buyer shall compensate Seller monthly at the following rates:
(a) 9.2 Mills per Kwh, if supplied from Seller's system; Commission File Number 3U228 or 0CT 101973 APPnovcn TME STATE CORPORATION COMMISSI Of KANSAS By . ad *2b .' eisry
i
$ $ )
1 (b) Cost of procurement, plus 0.6 Mill per Kwh. l Tax t.djustment ;
When any city, town or taxing authority imposes a franchise, occupation, gross receipts, business, sales, license, excise, privilege or similar tax upon the electrical operations of this Company within said city, town or taxing authority boundary, the amount thereof shall be charged to each customer within said city, town or taxing authority bcondary, in'the s.ame form in which it is imposed on the Company. All such taxes so imposed on this Company shall be added as a separate charge to customer's bill for electric service. Any particular class of customer exempted from said tax by said city, town or taxing authority in the calculation of said tax upon the Company shall be exempt from the adder contemplated herein.
Section 4 - Term This Service Sched'ule B shall become effective on the date hereof and shall continue for the same period as and concurrent with the Electric commi.+ ,en, m m w 73U228 '
APPROVED . ..f...I01973 TiEC STATE CORPORATION CO ._
OF KANSAS By n O<a J , ga,,
.l . __
g Interconnection Agreement of which this Sarvica Schedula B 10 o part. Termi-nation, however, shall not be made effective while Emergency Service is being supplied.
Executed as of the date hereinabove written.
CITY OF MWhe
(
, KANSAS By 12 0 4 %
Mayor
~~
ATTEST:
t
/*dW k. 2 11 &
' Cipflerk SEAL
' KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ,
c By .v / /
.,/ _ .
V A'lTEST:
.k t sA Secretary SEAL commi.en ni. uu d.r .. . 73U228-A e r e,o v r o O.CI .1.0_.19Z3_
B-4 Tar STATE CORPORATION CO"*en4 Of KANSAS By ' b2 C.. SecrtisfF
a 4
u: . .
Service Schedule C Economy Energy This Service Scha.dule C is agreed to be effective on June 1 ,
19 73 , and as a part of and under 'that certain Electric Interconnection Agreement
, 19 73, between the City of Mulvane dated March 12 _,
Kansas, and Kansas Gas and Electric Company. It shall apply to said parties for the purposes and in the manner as s,et forth in this Service Schedule C.
Section 1 - Economy Energy Economy Energy as used herein shal? m an electric energy from units which at the time have surplus capacity not required by Seller, or can be delivered by Seller at a cost which is lower than the cost Buyer would incur by producing or procurement of such energy.
Section 2 - Availability Economy Energy is available to the Buyer only to the extent that such party has alternata dependable capacity, including Adequate Reserve Capacity, which could otherwise be used.
Economy Energy is not available under this Service Schedule C during paak periods, or during abnormal conditions on the Seller's system.
Peak periods, not to exceed 400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br /> per year, will be those
! d( Jignated by the Company in an Operating Memorandum submitted to the City prior to December 31st of each calendar year and applicable to the next suc-l ceeding calendar year. These periods will consist of not less than eight (8) consecutive hours each and conform in general with five days per week (Monday l
' through Friday) for a period of ten weeks comprising the forecasted period of the Company's annual peak. Power taken by the City, if any, during su::h periods i
will be billed and paid for under whatever otha'r 5 guje,gpg1 gable.7 3 U 2 2 8 APPROVEB 0CT 101973 THE STATE CORPOMATION COM' i C-1 or KAMSAS
~~ A **""S'""*
4 9 Buyer will normally submit,18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> in advance, a daily schedule of energy to be delivered and its system operator will acknowledge and approve such schedule, which then becomes binding upon both parties for the amount and period so designated.
If the parties mutually agree to purchase and sell the specified Economy Energy, then Seller shall furnish the agreed amount of Economy Energy from any source available to it; provided that, if an emergency shoul'd occur on Seller's system so as to force Seller to buy energy at a rate higher than the agreed upon selling price for such Economy Energy in order to fulfill the specific Economy Energy commitment to Buyer, Buyer agrees that it will, to the maximum extent possible, relieve Seller of its obligation to supply such Economy Energy.
Section 3 - Payment for Economy Energy Service The Buyer will compensate the Seller for all energy delivered under this Schedule at the following monthly rate:
(a) 5.0 Mills per Kwh, if supplied from Seller's system; or (b) Cost of procurement, plus 0.6 Mill per Kwh.
Fuel Adjustment Minus or plus 0.0109C per Kwh for each IC or fraction thereof by which the average cost per million Btu of fossil fuels used at the Company's electric generating stations during the next preceding month is less than, or exceeds 240 per million Btu. The factor will be determined by multiplying the increase above 24c or the decrease below 24c by 0.0109c and by the ratio of net kilowatt-hours generated by fossil fuels to net kilowatt-hours generated Commienion File Number 73U228
_ OCT 101973 APPROVED THE STATE CORPORATION CO of KA AS By. E b ........D Sarfedery
. l e . '. . O e and purchased in that month. Such average costs determined in accordance with the Federal Power Commission's Uniform System of Accounts, will be as shown by the Company's books including transportation equipment costs to l 1
unloading point.
Tax Adjustment When any city, town or taxing authority imposes a franchise, occupa-tion, gross receipts, business, sales, license, excise, privilege or similar tax upon the electrical operations of this Company within said city, town or taxing authority boundary, the amount thereof shall be charged to each customer within said city, town or taxing authority boundary, in the same form in which it is imposed on the Company. All such taxes so imposed on this Company shall be added as a separate charge to customer's bill for electric service. Any particular class of customer exempted from said tax by said city, town or taxing authority in the calculation of said tax upon the Company shall be exempt from the sdder contemplated herein.
Section 4 - Term This Service Schedule C shall become effective on the date hereof, and sha.'.1 continue for the same period as and concurrent with the Electric Commission Fue Number .
b APPROVED .'.0 CI .1.0. .!973 TBE STATE CORPORATION CO Or KA AS
,, d'v J - 4 3 ,
9
':-3
. . . O fi Interconnection Agreement of which this Service Schedule C is a part. Termi-nation, however, shall not be made effective while Economy Energy is being j i
supplied. l Executed as of the date hereinabove written.
CITY OF N he _ , KANS AS t
By '
M Mayor ATTEST:
~
l , h
{'.,,/.Ctyy/ Clerk SEAL i
-i
?
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- fl !
By .t ATIEST:
e hv w4b Secretary
~
SEAL N
cami-k,n rii. %w, . _7 3 0 2 2 R APPROVED 0 CT .1. 01973 '
TET. STATE CORPORATION COM Or KAN S g7
- wW6 s*71)
C-4 -. - - - - - - - - - - - - 'r
-- s,..-
Q r
Feptember 5, 1972 The Honorable Robert O Sullivan, Mayor and City Councilmen City of Mulvane Mulvane, Kansas 67110 Gentlemen: .
For the purpose of implementing an Electric Interconnection Agreement between Kansas Gas and Electric Company and the City of Mulvane dated Merch 12 ,197'3, the parties understand:
I. Kansas Gas and Electric Company presently owns a three-phase feeder line in first class condition located in public right-of-way on the east side of Rock Road to Kansas Highway K-15.
II. The City of Mulvane has been advised by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company that certain conflicts make the construction of the line on the west side of Rock Road difficult and expensive. Private right-of-way on the east side of the road is also expensive.
III. The City of Mulvane has requested that they have the option to overbuild the Kansas Gas and Electric Company's 12 kv line from a point at 95th Street - South to a point approximately 1450' north of Kansas Highway K-15 for the purpose of the interconnection.
IV. This arrangement, while unusual, will be approved by Kansas Gas and Electric Company due to the extenuating circumstances and in-the best interests of the City of Mulvane, considering that all con-struction, operating and contractual conditions can be met as follows:
V. 69 kv Line - 95th Street - South to the Mulvane 69 kv-12 kv Substation
- 1. Construction (Applicable in the event the option set out in III above is exercised)
- a. The City of Mulvane, at its sole risk and expense, will re-place the present 12 kv poles with minimum 80', Class 1, Douglas fir poles with full length 5 lb. penta cellon treatment.
Commission File Number 730228 APPROVEB -.
OCT 101973 THE STATE CORPORATION COM ,
By. _ - -- ecrtW
o q
e The Honorable Robert O Sullivan, Mayor and City Councilmen
- b. The City of Mulvane, at its sole risk and expense, will re-establish the Kansas Gas and Electric Company 12 kv circuit on the new 69 kv poles. The work must be done by a com-petent line contractor without interruption to present Kansas Gas and Electric Company customers. The con-tractor selected must be approved by Kansas Gas and Electric Company.
- c. Both the 69 kv and 12 kv lines will be vertical construction using Kansas Gas and Electric Company's Line Construction Standards for this configuration.
- d. The City of Mulvane will remove and salvage the existing 12 kv line from 95th Street south, and such salvage shall be for the account of the City of Mulvane.
- e. Any rearranging of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company circuits to accomodate the 69 kv line will be at the sole risk and expense of the City of Mulvane.
- 2. Maintenance and Operation During the life of the agreement, Kansas Gas and Electric Company will perform all operating and maintenance of the line as follows:
- a. In the event of storm, collision, other damage, or for gene ral maintenance, Kansas Gas and Electric Company will replace as necessary poles and relate hardware and d
repair the Mulvane 69 kv circuit as required on a standard Customer Order charge basis. All 12 kv circuit mainte-nance or replacement will be at Kansas Gas and Electric Company's expense,
- b. Kansas Gas and Electric Company shall have the right to operate, maintain or modify the 12 kv circuit without restrictions so long as such modification does not inter-fere with the 69 kv transmission line .:arried on such poles.
- 3. Throughout the life of the agreement, the City of Mulvane will lease the entire 69 kv line from the Company's El Paso Sub-c o mi .t n ra. % d.,
730228 OCT
- - - -101973-APPROVED --
THE STATE CORroRAT10N COMMISSI Of KAFSAS gy ,,, D 8 c t88FF
. O &
The Honorable Robert O Sullivan, Mayor and City Councilmen 3
station to the City of Mulvane's 69 kv- 12 kv Substation owned by the City of Mulvane to Kansas Gas and Electric Company for the exclusive use of this interconnection, at the rate of $1.00 per annum.
- 4. With thirty (30) days' prior notice, Kansas Gas and Electric Company will have the right to purchase from the City of Mulvane the entire 69 kv line between Kansas Gas and Electric Company's El Paso Substation and the City's Substation at Mulvane. However, the integrity and quality of the interconnec-tion with the Kansas Gas and Electric Company system will not be impaired during the life of the agreement. At such time as Kansas . Gas and Electric Company may so exercise its right to purchase the said line, if at that time, such purchase shall require tha a pproval of the electorate of the City of Mulvane, Kansas, then, in such event, the said purchase shall be predi-cated upon the consent of the said electorate, or any such other consent as may then be effective to authorize said sale. In this connection the Mayor and City Council of the City of Mulvane will exercise good faith in doing all necessary acts in any way helpful in securing any such approval, whether necessary by referendum or otherwise, provided, however, that if such approval, if then required, is not so received, Kansas Gas and Electric Company shall have the right to lease said line for its exclucive use, in preference, at its option, to the lease provisions of 5 3 hereof, for any and all uses including any such-uses not related to the City of Mulvane, for a period ending with the expiration of this agreement, and pay the City of Mulvane the fixed charges for said line.
Fixed charges, as the term is.used herein, shall mean the actual annualized cost (inclusive of, as applicable, taxes, interest, insurance and depreciation) to the City of Mulvane of owning said line, computed on the basis of the original cost of said line, less that portion of the cost allocable to distribution facilities originally installed on said line, and less the accrued depreci-ation computed at the rate of three (3) per cent per annum.
- a. The purchase price of the 69 kv line will be determined as being the initial installed cost of said line, less labor and material costs for 12 kv underbuild, less depreciation at the rate of three (3) per cent per annum, provided, Comminion File Numb., 73022x APPROVEB . 0 CT._La Jsza___
THE STATE CORPORATION CO '
of KAN AS By - _ . . . . . . . . _ . casey -
- -
- A, i
r The lionorable Robert O Sullivan, Mayor and City Councilmen 4
however, that if said purchase occurs on or before December 31, 1982, the said depreciation shall be at the rate of two (2) per cent per annum.
- b. The City of Mulvane will provide line construction cost information to Kansas Gas and Electric Company within sixty (60) days after completion of the line.
- 5. At no time will the City of Mulvane remove any portion of the line without giving Kansas Gas and Electric Company notice and the opportunity to purchase or lease the same under the provisions of f V, 4 hereof.
- 6. The City of Mulvane will, as a part of the consideration for this agreement, hereafter, and during the term of this agree.
ment, grant unto Kansas Gas and Electric Company any desired transmission franchise for lines of nominally 69 kv or higher voltage for a period expiring at the end of the term of this agreement.
VI. 69 kv Oil Circuit Breaker Addition to El Paso Substation
- 1. Construction
- a. The City of Mulvane will contract with Kansas Gas and Electric Company for the en,7;me ring, purchasing and installing of equipment at El Paso Substation to provide a 69 kv oil circuit breaker and other equipment for a 69 kv line terminal. Said work and installation will be charged for and promptly paid by the City of Mulvane in the amount of $41,570.00, all inclusive. Kansas Gas and Electric Company shall be required to purchase or Ceramincion File Number . Obbb '
Arraovr.a ....0c.T.1.0JU1_.
THC STATr. CORroRATIoM COM or KAN 1 teep By ..... ..
l
, m The Honorable Robelf O Sullivan, Mayor
' and City Councilmen lease said equipment in the event a purchase or lease '
occurs under the provisions of f V, 4 hereof, and such l purchase or lease shall be impressed with the same provisions as are set out in i V, 4, a hereof.
- 2. The City of Mulvane will pay Kansas Gas and Electric Company an annual payment of $650.00 which amount includes rental for bay space occupied by the City of Mulvane's equipment in Kansas Gas and Elec.tric Company's El Paso Substation. The amount shall be payable when the breaker is put into operation and on each anniversary date thereafter.
- 3. Maintenance and Operation Maintenance of the City of Mulvane's equipment in the El Paso Substation will be performed by Kansas Gas and Electric Company as follows:
- a. Kansas Gas and Electric Company will check the breaker every six (6) months for proper operation under the standard relay test schedule; and
- b. Kansas Gas and Electric Company wi.1 maintain the oil circui* breaker and filter the oil on an annual basis making a omplete inspection of mechanism, contacts, etc. , at that time,
- c. Normal maintenance performed under 3a and 3b will be performed on a fixed cost basis at the rate of $200.00 per annum, provided, however, that after December 31, 1977, said $200.00 per annum figure shall be supplanted by any such greater figure, on an annual basis, as will represent the actual cost of such maintenance but in no event less than $200. 00 per annum. Such items as air compressors, bushings, main breaker contacts, interrupters and all major items found to be defective or inoperable will be replaced by Kansas Gas and Electric Company at the Citf of Mulvane's expense on a Customer Order. Kansas Gas and Electric Company will normally notify the City of Mulvane before incurring such expense in excess o'f $100.00 on any one item. Any minor items to be taken care of at time of annual inspections will be paid for by Kansas Gas and Electric Company. %,;,,w, n, , ,_
73U228 APPROVEB 00T 1 0 1973 TifE STATE CORPoMAT1oM CO OT MAN A5 By .m_ _ ggry
g e
The Honorable Robert O Sullivan, Mayor and City Councilmen
- 4. In order to maintain the integrity of Kansas Gas and Electric Company's system, all of the City-owned equipment within the El Paso Substation will be leased to Kansas Gas and Electric Company at the rate of $1.00 per annum for the life of the agreement.
- 5. With thirty (30) days' prior notice, Kansas Gas and Electric Company will have the right to purchase or lease from the City of Mulvane the equipment owned by the City located within El Paso Sub st etion. However, the integrity and quality of the interconnection with t, e Kansas Gas and Electric Company system will not be im-paired during the life of the agreement,
- a. The purchase price. of said equipment will be determined as being the initialinstalled cost, less depreciation at the rate of three (3) per cent per annum.
- b. This right to purchase or lease, and the above said'depreci-ation rate shall all be impressed with the same provisions as 7 V, 4 hercof.
- 6. At no time will the City of Mulvane cause to be removed any portion of the equipment owned by the City of Mulvane and located within El Paso Substation without giving Kansas Gas and Electric Company notice and the opportunity to purchase or lease the same as provided in f V, 4 hereof.
If the above is satisfactory, please sign the attac'ned copy in the space provided below and return one copy.
Yours very truly, KANS4S gS AND ELECTRIC ~
COMPANY f ;.
By\ A -
.* = __
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
(
CITY OF MULVANE commiasion rii, Number 78U228 APPROVES .0 C.T._1.0 31 7 THE STATE CORPORATION CO of[
or EANSAS By _ W ~-
g -
Mayor g W
/
/ -
By '
n/, W 4:
.. ~
w w , , ,
Y Y Y v
+ l
. % i
- o, . - 't 4_ .- ,, c a t,~ W-- ; A. . . * * ,
- a. ====. N- w i = cei .=, s o, *esm e g- TySHC* . ,=* ,
j .
,__, \ l . m,~
- M, a-- .
Iw %,, .7 0,
- M; * ' (
'***.....'m,.vo g, "'""* (
- ,,,.*'"==sg EWTON 4 - - ,.
\! e=a
- '"""**iI
***'C'* m'*** \ ', ,
' ,8 7 } .o
/
, ,c.,, ,
%" =.mr. s f f 8
, EL DORADO
- 5"'"g{7 e"" s 4
.au.a .o.e .=.a. ca. w \,' . ' u=15w11 s' - c/ y - .
N
. I, 8
, #
- I"?
i W:
J' ,7- A ; y%=au=P
== -
%g*g */?-~tE .o y e 4
k_1, c, g} .!
4 v1 c**
r _').
I,
' WICHITA
-j q , {k.
s
\_ i n
(_v\ y. - ..,_ 4 _ g -g% 2, _ w_
)
u y ...g=g. > w;,,,,,,,
4 ,
.o. s 9sy7,
- / _ 4- .
. , ..... 7.,9x , .a s' ,
p= =_. , 6. .
, , * * '"'3" cn 8
j; I 'Ld. "[",8,"."." " ' **** #
%%% (
CA... -
, i h
.\ ,,
..,s
, aa r
\ 3 % <-~_. - , C******
', ; INDEPENDENCE g **.,* ,
Nm a*
~
AR ANSAS CITY
% ,,,,,,o,.
c j
[7 g .,
g 2
\'
c- ,W. !( !!
w ,_. c_._, g!~-._'-
7 .. a - o- .1
. - - - .7 ,
j) p' ' '
- 'a q u e
{~]
LEGENO ce= m43 m.e A g , 4
- es o < g 8h.CF=meew Sv.5,.no ms5 .Wh.Ote.p 3.s v -
iI #
m-g **C" ,"l ' " * ' *g i
/s
. _9 gem ir vwa ntscrserc conamasw
- cw a w V.
1 MULVAN E ...o ~~
.m mac=c was ascw s c- - o u s == -c .a-.c.n.
r,% r.,. ,
~~~' System Map of **C'Qw_ ===3* *
+
4 i >
i[4 Q 'M
.s : -c-.,-
'WCL
V ;1. I 3* KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC C0MPANY e a .-
"'s a
,r -
s ', t >=* . w oc nor a. aansas ** *y** ~ ;_*c'cc 'g centsat arroces
-(f
. c. ,m,u. .,c, c Cc ., .,,0
.,,o a
/
aCr 4%= ... .
i.,.
.u
- Qc%"* lZ ** ,y y ENL ARGEMEN T OF WICHI TA AREA ,
- ~ , . - 2. e..w.- . #
s . . . . . . -
- * *
- e
b__,_. ,
- * ' M(ccro. Dennis Evans 2) B.1-3
{ss'j G. W. Evan ph Fiabach I "
E. S. Hall
) KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY y
Jack Skelton
" "' " ' " "R. E. Tate /M. Shank F. M. Kimball/ Wilson Cadman October 3, 1973 Bernard Ruddick
......oc.
- H. K. Tatum/N. F. Pinkstaff
...............u..
E. Phillips portant Document File Mr. Kenneth F. Plum . Secretary Federal Power Comm ssion Washington, D. C 20426 Ele'etric Intdrconnection Agreement dated March 12, 1973, Service Schedules A, B and C and Letter of Understanding with the City of Mulvane, Kansas INITIAL FILING 9
Dear Mr. Plumb:
In accordance with the Commission's Regulations, we submit the following pursuant to:
Part 35, Sec. 35.12, Filing. of Initial Rate . Schedules, Par. (a)
(1) Enclosed is a copy of this letter, two copies of the Agreement dated March 12, 1973, Service Schedules A, B and C, the Letter cf Understanding, Title Page, and a check for $100 to cover the filing fee.
~
(2) June 1,1973 is the effective date of the Agreement and Service Schedules although due to construction,,
the actual interconnection may not be closed for some time.
(3) Copics of the Agreement and Service Schedules have be'en furnished to:
(i) Mr. Robert O. Sullivan, Mayor and City Councilman City of Mulvane Mulvane, Kansas 67110 (ii) Mr. Fred B. Adam, Acting Director Utilitics Division State Corporation Ccamissia:
4th Floor, State Office Building Topeka, Kansas 66612
. FM1 N, Atarket - WicNta, Kansas - Alad Addressi P.O. Box 208 / Wichits, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (31
a k Mr. Kennsth F. Plumb, S2crctery Q
Page Two
' October 3, 1973 .
~
(4) Service Schedule A - Firm Power Service covers the quantities, conditions and the period of ti-e' that electric power and energy will be made available by the Seller.
Monthly Rate: $1.725 per kw per month of billing demand, plus 4.5 mills per kwh for energy delivered hereunder; or cost of procurement, plus 0.6 mill per kwh if necessary for Seller to
. purchase firm power from other sources.
Fuel Adjustment: Adjustment factor of 0.0109c per kwh for each ic or fraction thereof deviation from base cost of fuel of 24c and by the ratio of gener-ated to generated plus purchased kwh's.
Service Schedule B - Emergency Service covers electric power and energy supplied by one party to the other under emergency conditions.
Monthly Rate: 9.2 mills per kwh; or cost of procurement plus 0.6 mill per kwh Service Schedule C - Economy Energy covers electric energy from units whien at the time have -
surplus capacity not required by Seller, or can be delivered by Seller at a cost which is lower than the cost Buyer would incur by producing or procurement of such energy.
Monthly Rate: 5.0 mills per kwh; or cost of procurement, plus 0.6 mill per kwh.
Fuel Adjustment: Same as Service Schedule A.
A separate letter details the understanding of both parties for the purpose of implementing the Agreement.
(5) Both parties have executed the Agreement, Service Schedules and Letter of Understanding.
Par. (b): .
(1) Due to the contingencies involved in all of these Service Schedules, we are unable to furnish a state-ment comparing sales and services and revenues therefrom by months for the twelve months succeeding the date of initial service ,;
t Mr. Kennsth F. Plumb, S:cratsry
())
Page Three I'
October 3, 1973 (2) and (3) Monthly rates for service under Schedules A, B and C are the same as those in comparable service schedules with other municipalities which have elec-tric generating plants, for example: Neodesha - FPC No.131, Chanute - FPC 128, Burlington - FPC No.126.
(4) Attached in duplicate is a system map showing the '
interconnection with the City of Mulvane.
Please advise us when the rate schedule number is assigned to this Agreement, Service Schedules .and Letter of Understanding.
Very truly yours,
.y. d .AL &
W. B. Walker Secretary and Controller WBW:BW: eld Enclosures
-_ . _. ~ _ ,_ . , , _ , . - . , - . - , , , , - , , . , , , , , . ,y..
- s. .
L B.1-4
." j i
...s
, l @- %..
e O- .
.q
..... . February 21 1974 . ... ..
...e,.
.. . . . .5 ..
$.p.t..; -$ b..4.R
+,.....,.a....... o . . . . :,. .> ., t . u . .. . . , ..:. m E .
. i.Yl};'L ' 4 ,it. .. %% . @ ,4.,,+,+
.~. . . . . . . .: ..
., :ll.V. M,
- f .. .; "
@g i..
m .
. . ' .. .. . , ... ,3 .
- l. ) . . . . ... < (.... .,...;, ..c. .)..p i . . . ./, , . i .
6 ,.. .
...c . .
. i,C O. 3**., # 'r.d'Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretaryig,.*'2r.'t. -. -m'g e?.6l7./~.g y gg/1..'- , f.;)4 '
i.. Federal Power Commission '
' '~- '
m13 2 ' . g.im . *(~,.pWashington',"D. C.'"~204 2 6 "* * ?*7 * - ' - ' *.
Dear Hr. Plumb:
." On October 3, 1973, we filed with the
.A 4, '. . , .
J -
, Commission an Electric Interconnection Agreement,
.- ' Q- i tw'4,.'f,f,%
related Service* Schedules and a Letter of ~
.,a '
Understanding with the City of Mulvane, Kansas, p Would you please advise us of the status of this. filing. . . a
. ?.
- \,y*u ;ss 'e;~. .y,' a.3.'..s,.v::- . . 3
- t. . , .
s..>, .
,,..If f,:, w: .;r,
,, $ . Very truly yours, , ,
- ,..a G.r ,. .,. . .. : .+.7c .
1
. n,- i .. . c - .. . 3 . w. . g , , .. ... .- .s zy t ,.: , . e . .
. '.n.
s.. t. o . . ; ..;. a., y. . .
. ,. . , .. s.q . . .
.. , s ., y P . 4. .. ,;:.;g. 5.g.> . .
. ,., ,y. .
'.'..,: ' * : y.t '. .
6
' o ;' . '-
~ 4, .
- 1. : <-. *:
.,9 ,, .
g.gI. b .pp 4.-. i 9. yl. ;,}. vsW:B.
.s 4 Wield. . ,. .
. fM. s. / f, .:,-
- f ) . . . . ,t .. 3,..*,..
...e
..',,;..v.
. .s
, f, t.v. d
,t
- g
', ). s.. >
..w - ,
4.[ . '
t
. .e e .b aa *,
.,. . . .s .
?. hts .< -... . .,
p .
. e . . ,,
.s. . .- , . . ;. . .. . , . of . ., ... . . .
zg . y. . , , , .
- +
- 3; ), .3.3 t. ,. . . .
- h. a,.o w' :;a j - . . . j. .
- . A. ./ , ,.1;.e
,. s.. ..
. , . r ., ; .,3
.4 .s ,". .
.' ;p .; / ,,. . .u. %, .g
,; :.,y ,
, . 9;,p ( .'
~* at, 4
n Y, 'I'W, , ., ,i' .'
Jf.,g#,S.*. 4' M:N*i.**.c.1..( * ...;' ( 0 n. .U.d.,N,y
?.' . ~.'t. .
9 .
3 0'..p.',/.. t e.. . . ..*
.,}.. . , t s,s., . re'.
.p.%.,. .. s. ..:e. - . .r.., . , * ,a. )u.s.. .. . . * .. . .'. .I .. .3 , , . ,
..r . x. r. . .s .
s ,. ,
a.;;. N , 1 1. % s .t . . y e'.s g..c4 p ;.*.-~. ., .n. . . g 3, .g ., ,, p.~s, ,
.*Q
'g . *a .
f fl .; }
.'*-e .
, 3 ,,
,%s
m B.1-5 u $.1
>p FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 .;'s
. - m ntety nerem foi k ,* V PWR-RC Docket No. E-8431 W h
P! - l Kansas Gas and Electric Company ;;'
Attention: Mr.11. B. Walker -
V.
Secretary and Controller #*7-81974 r P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 ,,
Q Gentlemen:
By your letter dated February 21, 1974, you inquired as to Y the status of your filing of an Electric Interconnection Agreement ,
e with the City of Mulvane, Kansas.
Your filing is now in the process of review; upon the completion of that review, you will receive notification of ,
w i
Commission action.
Very truly yours, ,
j tamm
/. W
& /
Secretary n* s r!.
2.
1 1
fe
~e i
i I
l '. $I
k., B.1-6 h.
4 4
~
FEDERAL POWEP COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 IN REPLY MEFEM TOs t}
g, PWR-RC ,
Docket No. E-8431 -
Kansas Gas and Electric Company Attention: Mr. W. B. Walker Secretary and Controller . l P. O. Box 208 .
Wichita, Kansso 67201 g 70197f
'uuur B
Centlemen:
By letter dated October 3,1973, you submitted for filing an .
Electric Interconnection Agreement with the City of Mulvane, Kansas. .V' Your submittal has been accepted for filing and has been designated as follows:
Kansas Gas and Electric Company Designations Descriptions Rate Schedule FPC No. 132 Electric Interconnection Agreement Exhibit "A" to Letter of Understanding Rate Schedule FPC No. 132 Supplement No. 1 to Service Schedule A (Firm Power)
Rate Schedule FPC No. 132 .. _
Supplement No. 2 to Service Schedule B (Emergency Service)
Rate Schedule FPC No. 132 P
Supplement No. 3 to Service Schedule C (Economy) f Rate Schedule FPC No. 132 Notice of the filing was issued on November 13, 1973, with comments,
~
protests, or petitions to 1.ntervene due on or before December 4,1973. ;
No comments, protests or interventions have been filed. ~-
With reference to your request for waiver of the notice requirements, b L--
the Commission has found that good cause has been shown for such action pursuant to the requirements of Section 205(d) of the, Federal Power Act [C and Section 35.11 of the Commission's Regulations thereunder and has PC provided that the rate schedule shall become effective as of the date of initiation of service. Picase advise Commission as to that date.
h
~ m
[Yg ,,j 7s : )Juxw JUa .6~f 0&*'4)6~/^'M'/M'-/W'"O$
i &.yhakA/wa,,,,,/<husi.;, junAg $
d f $4c% / -
I f
.. _ mm m _ - _._ _ .__ __-_
____-_________=---- _ _ _
- ' NN[e#,
% 5 fje #
- b ][ g ,' j. [ n , ' .
, , e,g , g ]
- ~
_..- :.a__
. ~ v. : - '
6 @
.o 1.
s
[i:a,. .
p Kansas Gas and Electric' Company bummer This acceptance for filing does not constitute approval of any ,
service, rate, charge, classification, or any rule, regulation, con- ~'
tract, or practice affecting such rate or service provided for in the above-designated rate schedules; nor shall such acceptance be deemed 2 as recognition of any claimed contractual right or obligation affecting 6' l
or relating to such service or rate; and such acceptance is without .,'
i prejudice to any findings or orders which have been or may hereafter .-
be made by the Commission in any proceeding now pending or hereafter ,
instituted by or against your company. m +
This acceptance for filing terminates Docket No. E-8431. J By direction of the Commission, p l,. '
ecretary g cc: Mr. Robert O. Sullivan -?
Mayor and Councilman City of Mulvane Mulvane, Kansas 67110 s t
I h
W w.s b
b aa Af
- f, 4%
[
cg..
- mand.
6 t
f w
a . . -
g g B.1-7 KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- June 21, 1974
- w. a. w a L n c n
................u.
- ?
Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary Federal Powei Commissi'o'n Washington, D. C. 20426 Electric Interconnection Contract dated March 12, 1973 including Service Schedules A, B, C and a Letter of Understanding with the City of Mulvane, Kansas, designated Rate Schedule 132
Dear Mr. Plumb:
Referring to your letter dated April 19, 1974, initial service to the City of Mulvane, Kansas was June 18, 1974.
A Very trulfljours / ' y?
.ktEp4ad Bill Whitmer, Mannger Rates and Data Processing BW: eld i
i
,A 20! N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Mail Address: P. O. Box 208 ( Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 264-1111
. . . . ~ . . - - _ . , _ , . . . . . . . . - -_
," . /
- B.2-1 sn.o
/
0 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE 13 I --I -
+ .
so to es ..
i
__ e r aus... . .
_ CAO A R.. .
._._ sin co._.1o.. Mr G W Evans
. sms c,.w...
' ~
Z.I(([Ac . 5 TE, July 13, 1971 cwt City of Erie, Kansas Et$".ss
___m .u. faillif : 8Jthis
.- u. t.
._ .w. .
- -j;';';- At our meeting last Friday with of ficials of Erie, Kansas, it
_was concluded that if we were to accomplish an interconnection with Erie
~_ s uo u. .. -
- "~ Lt would be necessary to build approximately 9 miles of 69 kv line from
-- ,'][i
__ tam
... ..'.'.Z" ...
Jrbana Sub at which location Erie would provide their own tap and substation.
- .~---Ul%'d . ' " ~ ~ This line, if built for service by June 1972, would not be in
. win eut..., ...
--the KG&E five year forecast. At some future date the 69 kv tie from Urbana
"~~"to a 138/69 kv substation west of Walnut would be required.
'"~~
me l.
As you can see from the attached tabulation, the Erie system will not be deficient until 1978. *1his is based on Mr Dwight Mays', Utility Superintendent, calculations using 5% compounded growth, which I believe you will agree is on the conservative side.
Therefore, without revenue potential from firm power purchases, the KG&E investment in 69 kv line precludes the economic soundness of the
,( ,
interconnection. However, it was suggested to the Erie officials that something might be worked out if they would purchase enough economy power i
to cover our fixed charges on the 69 kv line.
1 Mr Mays called me yesterday indicating that their net kilowatt hour sales during the period June 1972 to May 1973 would equal i
6,801,773 kwh 1
less entire Erie load during 400 peak hours 136,700 kwh 6,665,073 x 4 mills (present economy schedule less fuel) = $26,660.
Nine miles of 69 kv line at $20,000 per mile = $180,000 Fixed charges on investment at 15% per annum = $27,000 per annum.
It is recommended that we propose to the Erie town council the following:
KG&E enter into a standard interconnection contract including schedules for Transmission Service, Emergency Service, Economy Service and Firm Service. That the City of Erie purchase from KG&E an amount of economy power equal to $25,000 per annum covering the fixed charges on the l
- k. -
!,J a 4 -y.
i,h? 1. _, ,
t
., / 'j ,*.'
t u.
f KG6E investment for approximately 9 miles of 69 kv line. That this $25,000
,a fr annual purchase be in effect until KC&E's 69 kv transmission line is com-
.' e pleted between Urbana and our 138 kv line to the east. At that time the minimum purchase requirement would be discontinued and the City of Eric could elect to continue the purchase of the necessary firm capacity to comply with the 125% requirement and economy or emergency as needed, g The political climate with the Mayor, Mr LeRoy Priess,and the Utility Superintendent, Mr Dwight Mays, is very favorable. They will both recommend this arrangement to the council. I know there will be concern on the part of the council about discontinuing generation at the plant to
" eat up" the minimum. 1 believe they can be persuaded.
We have been invited to appear before the council Tuesday, July 20, at 7:30 pm. Your early response to this proposal would be appreciated.
f s
- ~-=
WKC/vr Attach cc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach E S Itall F M Kimbell John llansberry Bernard Ruddick R E Phillips Joe Cumiskey 1
l i
o fYI e , l(ous?S ~1 -l3 - 7/
=
f pee,ajg Pe?% Totai Fn it, 1 F, i fa -
. ~AC6V Loed Ciit Ca:nk!.t~1 Pov: I.3
- se
' Ce s t
' t%e I9 7o _ , 2,0cc 2, 500 3615' Uou e (Cl 7 l/ 2,f50 Q6SS H H H o
- I ? 7.1 R,255 2,Vi? ii u i $73 2,32F 2,9 04 to n tu h
i l'l 7 '! 2, </ <!b 3,oso ut n l776~y 2,56o 3,2o0 "
l'l76 2,700 3,2?T n " "
4 ICf77 9.,530 S,53 V U ic (El1Y ^
,765 3,706 v 7i $16;'s I? 77 3 //3 3,99I o 2 76 4767 7
l'l SO 3,271 'f,099 "
y%f & 7I 2.
~
e .- ,
I h OY '. (g' V $ Ukh,5eo y V.
b Wl]fif b*{3
. 1%
. c ass W l'l1T vakev I5a[8i-kof>uu &OEC I
l
\ .
i l
\
.I I e e
l B.2-2
- r F '.t F.inhall i
i July 21, 1971 Meeting with Erie Town Council
(*~.
I i
, !!r Cumiskey and I inet with the co.nplete Erie, Kansas Town Council 1
last nir.ht to present our proposal for an interconnection. tJe ucre very cordially received. A hir.h level of interest was shown causing the dis-cussion to laat over three hours.
Toward the end of the meeting, councilnen asked for a recommen-dation from the utility superintendent. ilis response was "to proceed as soon as possible uith the KG5E interconnection with tiie latter part of June 1972 as the tar ~.et date.
Substation line work and switch c. car purch.,se 'iill necessitate a revenue bond issue.
b'hile we received no final decision, I believe the comission will act in favor of the interconnection uninns sonc unforeseen obstacles develop.
WRC/vr cc - llenars G 11 Evans
.Talpin Fich.ic;
!! S llall -
Bernard .luidick John Itanaberry i R E Phillipa l Joe Cumiskey
B.2-3 July 22, 1371 e
The lionorabic LaRoy Priess
? favor of Lric Erie, Kans9s o6733 i>ent "ayor vr icou:
"r Cts,'is t;cy and I appreciate havinr. had the oppor-tunity to twet with you and other 1:rie city officials last l'uesday ni'tht. He felt the discussion uns +ost constructive.
Ec e.:re asked to deter r.ine ahen t:io City of *.ric had to make a decir:lon on tire intercortnectioa in orc'er to have it in o;>cratina L/ the last of June 1172. 'r Sidd lek , Super-intendent o' our frans.aission and I;3atribut ton Department, ad-viaes .e Liutt lu order to have the line in ;:ervice by tant ti.ie.
'A it would be neces eary for us to have a cor.mitizent no later than uid-October of this year.
11in allona us leaa tlac ror Lucetin and con-struction schelulin . The rost critical-requirement, however, is ri';nt-of-way purchase. 3s you pro': ably know, richt-of-vay is i>eco::in tore dif ficult to uc.notiate. b an exarple, conder-nation tine alcac on cny portion of the ri,..t- ef-way would tale a minimu'a of 90 Jaj n.
Should there be any further questions, please en11 ra.
Sincerely, WKC/vr cc 'tr Joo Cu:.iskey bc - Messrs G W Evans John llausberry Ralph Fiebach R E Phillips E S Hall F M Kimball Bernard Ruddick
-m- - - - .,. .,,, -- , -
a B.2-4
/
1 i
lir r il Kinball September 10, 1971 l
p)
\_
Tuesday we met with Ray Pershall representing Iola Industries, d
Jim Wilson representing Iola and the two principals in the Feen Corpora-tion, which is the new die castinn industry locatine, at the old Lehigh Cement Plant. We came to aqrcement on electric service to the Fecm Cor-i poration as voll as future plans for Iola Industries as they are able to attract new customers to the Lehinh Industrial Park.
Jerry Yount is neckinq final approv11 fron "r IIall and if all i jellc, everyone secas happy and satisfied.
In that ue had of fered to sell the Lohi-h snSntation to the City of Eric T Felt it advis.ahle to drive to r. rte to ailvise the avor that the equipment was no lonaer for sale. He found the ';ayor and provided hi"i with the information. ::o problen. I did ask h h how the plana for a possible interconnection with I;C6r. were progrecsinn. He said they had ground to a halt because several of the council menbers did not like the idea of the open end arrannement that we had presented with renards to the mininun. I revieved the reasons for the minimum and also indicated that wnile it was open end, there was no risk as far as the City of Erie is concerned. Furthersore I reminded Itayor Priess that this was now the fourth time they had nsked us for a proposition nince 1963, and that time was running out on them (uc have advised then by letter that a de-t cision must be nade by the niddle of October in order to have the line in
) service by June 1).
i 1:e agreed and stated that they are anain lookinc at engines.
l This is interestino, in that during previous sessions they have advised us that suppliers have said it would take at least 18 nonths to supply I generating equipment, new or used.
There is little Icadership in the town of 1:ric, at least on this subject. It appears that cycryone sinply hopes the problen will go away.
l We could consider the following:
- 1. Place a maxinum number of years on the minimum and assume that the kwh purchase arrangement would be so satisf actory they would continue to buy energy.
/
~
2 J
v
, .J.
i i s i 2. Drop the subject until such tine as they a?,ain take the j [i; initiative to consider the tie.
, '. i.
I don't believe the Engineering Departnent feels that the line I
'y would be of any value to us for a good many years.
Ec/vr i
l i
t t .
."', B.2-5
.M' i
September 22, 1971
-- The Mayor and City Council City of Erie Eric, Kansas 66733 f
Gentlemen:
On Tuesday, September 7, I visited !!ayor Priess in his office to notify him that our substation located at the LcHigh Cement Plant was no longer for sale. Several months ago we had indicated that we would con-sider selling the substation, but now have a new industry locating at the Lehigh site. As a consequence, it will be necessary to leave the sub-Station intact.
While visiting with Mayor Priesa about this matter, he indicated th.st the council members had not acted upon the interconnection proposal because of the so-called "open end" feature of the annual fixed charge
~' payments. Mayor Priess asked if we would consider placing a tirse limit on these annual payments. His question has prompted us to make further engineering review of the subject.
Before commenting on the results of that review, let ce again briefly outline our interconnection proposal as presented to the council the evening of July 9:
- 1) Kansas Cas and Electric Company would entor into a standard Interconnection Contract including schedules for Transmission Service, Emergency Service, Economy Service and Firm Service with the city of Erie.
- 2) That the city of Erie would purchase from KG&E an amount of economy power equal to $27,000 per annum covering the fixed charges on the KC&E investment for approximately 9 miles of 69 kv line to be constructed from the company's Urbana Substation.
- 3) That the $27,000 annual purchase be in effect until KG&E's future transmission requirements nake it necessary to complete the 69 kv transmission line between Urbana and the KG&E 138 kv line to the east.
l 1
l i
I l
/
- ^
- 4) At such time the minbaum purchase requirement would be dis-continued and the city of Erie could elect to continue the purchase of the necessary firm power capacity to comply with the contractual 125%
requirement and economy or emergency energy as needed.
You will recall that the calculations for the annual charge was based on the following:
9 miles of 69 kv line at $20,000 per mile = $180,000 Fixed charges on investment at 15% per annum = $27,000 per annua Mr Dwight Mays, Utility Superintendent, furnished us with an estimate of Erie's net kilowatt-hour sales during the period June 1972 to May 1973. From this we calculated the approximate cost to the city to purchase power from the company. Those calculations were:
6,801,773 kwh 136,700 kwh - less entire Erie load during 400 peak hours 6,665,073 kwh x 4 mills (present economy schedule less fuel) = $26,660 (not including sales tax)
CORCLUSIONS OF R'dVIEW Using the system demand figures supplied by Mr }kys indicating a SI annual compound growth through 1980, studying our own system require-ments for that onme period and investigating other alternative methods of providing future capacity and reliability to the KG&E system, we cannot predict any need for a tie between our Urbana Sub and our 133 kv line during the next ten year period. Consequently, it would be inprudent for us to agree to a time limit on the annual charge based on our present knowledge of the growth potential and the subsequent completion of the tie.
I would again remind you that while the annual mininum charge does represent a substantial commitment on the part of the city, that com-mitment also buyo a substantial amount of power at a very favorable rate.
We believe we have made you a sound proposition and regret that the economics are not such that your request for a shut-off date on the minimum can be arranged, i
- Should you have additional questions, or if we can be of further i assistance, don't hesitate to call me.
t
, Sincerely, ,
WKC/vr bc - Messrs G W Evans John Hansberry Ralph Fiebach R E Phillips F M Kimball Joe Cumiskey E S Hall Jim Lucas Bernard Ruddick Ralph Foster
1 B.2-6 1
I l
l January 5, l')72 l
i The Mayor and City Council City of 1;ric l Eric, Lanca:; 66733 t.en tle s..e n .
This is to advise you that the terus outlined in ny letter Se,) tenner 22, 1J71 re,ardin.', an Interconnection . reer.;ent between ::auaaa (as and Electric Cor..pany and the City of r.ric are hereby withdrawn.
Uc advisee.1 you in our letter of July 22nd that uc should kno.i your intention oy nid-October to allo.i tie. uccessary time
, for construction of tlic line to have it in operation in June 1972.
In that this time has passed and other economic con-l
' siderations have enan;7ed, vc find it necesonry to make this with-drawal.
Please understand, houcver, that uhca the council is again interested .Ln discussing an interconnectica, we vill be
,ilenned to v.tcet with you and present firures and costs appropriate for that period and tinae.
Sincerely- ,
UKC/vr bc - Messrs F M Kimball Ralph Ficbach G W Ev&as E S Hall Ralph Foster Joe Cumiskey
I I B.2-7 January 19, 1973 I
1 Mr Charles Leava Kirkwood & Associates 7800 The Pasco Kansas City, tilssouri 64131
Dear Mr Leava:
I have enclosed the information you requested by, phone yesterday morning regarding your engineering study with the City of Erie, Kansas.
The Electric Interconnection Agreement, KG&E Form GitIA. is our standard interconnected municipal contract. We have penciled in appropriate changes reflecting new rates as approved by the Federal Power Commission ef fective January 10. These have not as yet been put in ef fect as a couple of details are presently being
, cleared with the FPC. The Electric Interconnection Agreement attachments include our Service Schedules A, B and C. -
In addition I have also enclosed a copy of our proposed rate schedule PWM, Public Utility Resale, as you requested.
We made proposals to the City of Erie in 1969 and 1971.
As discussed during our phone conversation, it will be necessary I for the City to provide a substation fed from our 69 kv source at Urbana. KC&E could agree to construct this line with the
- City paying the annual fixed charges on it.
I I have told John Hansberry you may be calling him for additional information as you get into your study, and he would be happy to hear from you. Just as a suggestion and as you begin to formulate some ideas on the study, I would be pleased to meet with you and our engineering group here in Wichita.
Sincerely, WKC/vr Attachments bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach W B Walker Ralph Foster G W Evans John Hansberry Jim Lucas F M Kimball Bernard Ruddick Joe Cumiskey E S Hall R E Phillips
) B.2-8 Mr Ralph Fiebach March 7, 1973 ,
d
,A j
Last v 'ek while in Pittsburg, I had an emergency telephone message from d
Mayor Pi'ess of Erie, Kansas. I reached the mayor that evening.
1 The substance of his question waa - would we allow the City to tic up temporarily with The Cooperative Electric Power & Light Company Inc as a back-up to their generating deficiency. The Cooperative LP&L has a substation with some capacity in it in the area, and, apparently, Wes
., Clendenen brought up the idea.
I advised the mayor thic, was not possible under the rates as filed in that j they specificially refer to ultimate users being those within the cooper-ative's area where they hold a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity.
I
!!e was inclined to want to argue the point in that their situation con-stitutes an emergency which, of course, we have known for several years.
About two weeks ago I received a call from Kirkwood & Associates asking for current information on interconnections. They are another firm that
( has been retained by Erie to review interconnections versus additional l generating capacity.
S
] Mayor Priess told me that while they have bought the generating equipment from the old Lehigh Cenent Company operation they are not now going to I
install it even thou?,h it has been paid for.
Frankly, the town of Eric is in a ress. Ouster proceedings are under way against the mayor; the city clerk has been convicted of embezzlement; the city superintendent haa left, and the electrical deficiency is serious.
There is no leadership, as I believe the mayor is just incompetent, i
, I hesitate to start interconnection negotiations again for various reasons.
I planted the idea in the Kirkwood engineering minds of taking a look at a wholesale arrano,ement. The fuel situation can't be good and the i
condition of their plant leaves much to be desired. Possibly the time l 1 is ripe to develop some leadership contacts in the town .nd discuss the l 4 possibility of a wholesale or even retail deal.
Maybe we should sit down and review the idea.
I WKC/vr cc - Messrs F !! Kirball E S tiall
I ./ B.2-9
<*/
April 16, 1973 1 .
i The IIonorable LeRoy Priess Mayor of Eric Crie, Kansan 66733 i
Dear Mayor Priess:
Your City Clerk, Mr Strickland, furnished us with monthly peak demands and net kilowatt-hours r,enerated for the year 1972.
As you and I discussed at the power plant April 5, we agreed to apply KC6E's wholesale rate, PIO!-173, to these demands and kilowatt-hours so that you could see what the approximate cost to the city for the year 1972 would be had you been a wholesale customer of the conpany.
Each column on the tabulation is identified including monthly fuel adjustinent cost for that period. The last colunt. will pro-
{ vide you with the total nonthly dollar cost and the annual cost.
I believe you will be interested to note that based on your 1972 operations, your average annual cost of purchased power from us on l'kol-173 would be 1.10c per kilowatt-hour.
I will be pleased to visit with you about these finures whenever you desire.
Sincerely, l
I WKc/vr Attach be - Messrs G W Evans W B Walker e um skey Ralph Fiebach * ""# "
F M Kimball Ralph Foster E S Hall
f.'
, -t WKC/vr 4/16/73 d CITY OF ERIE l KGE Rate Schedule PWM-173 Applied to 1972 Monthly Peak Demands and Kilowatt-Hours Generated I
Billing Fuel
) }
%/
1972 KWil Demand Sub-Total Adj us tment Net Total January 514,600 1000 $ 5,379.90 $ 30.36 $ 5,410.26 f February 466,600 1000 5,067.90 17.73 5,085.63 March , 467,300 900 4,868.95 (1.87) 4,867.08 April 444,100 1100 4,988.75 (22.65) 4,966.06 May 474,600 1200 5,312.26 19.93 5,332.19 June 662,700 2000 7,447.87 29.16 7,477.03 July 713,600 2000 7,860,15 81.35 7,941.51 August 748,000 2200 8,291.80 77.04 8,368.84 September 583,300 2100 6,778.49 48.41 6,826.90 October 499,900 1000 5,284.35 40.99 5,325.34
() November 506,600 546,400 1100 5,476.40 46.10 5,522.50 h December 1300 5,970.34 15.30 5,985.64 Total 6,627,700 $72,727.13 $ 381.85 $73,108.98 l
l t
4 l
l
\
, e *[f j d B.2-10 I
s Mr Ralph Fiebach May 8, 1973 City of Erie As discussed with you and Mr Evans, Mr Cumiskey and I met with the Erie Council last Thursday evening. All councilmen were in attendance and, in addition, the Mayor had invited some forner council members and prominent citizens to discuss their electric energy supply.
I outlined two possible proposttions:
- 1. An Electric Interconnection
- 2. Wholesale Service.
We told then that, frankly, the City should consider the wholesale propo-sition and dispose of the plant. We conceded that this was probably a new idea and while it might be slightly controversial with some citizens it has considerable merit considering the condition of the present plant
, and the high cost to the city to construct an interconnection due to the lack of proxiuit/ to KG&E facilities.
p g5g Aco.i7 I had asked Mayor Pricss to develop some data on their electric utility operation. Uc advised us that the 1972 expenses directly chargeable to the power plant operation was $91s00T334 During that same period if PWM-173 is applied to their net kilowatt-hodrs generated, the annual power bill to us would have been $73,108.98.
City bonded debt on the plant is $191,000 with $100,000 in reserve as i
required by Kansas law. Last year's peak for the city was 2200 kw.
i Forty percent (40%) of their total capacity is in one unit. They feel j that they will be in trouble this summer.
[
Several weeks ago Erie officials learned that the Cooperative Electric Power & Light Company had 1500 kw of temporary capacity from their sub-station located at Urbana. This could be gotten with a couple of spans of secondary. At the tiue the question was raised, I told them it would not be possible as the REC rate provides for sale to REC accounts only.
l This question was again raised the other night by Dr William C Weir, MD, l
l (new on the council). tie asked if we would consider allowing them to make a temporary tap providing they signed either an interconnecting or whole-sale agreement with us and recognizing that it would probably take at least a year to get built in to the city. I told him that while not being able i
to commit to such an arrangement, I thought it could be considered through O
special dispensation with the Commission and our Engineering Department
' as a means to bail them out if their system broke down this sumner. I am afraid that any response to the contrary on my part could have been inter-k preted as either a wedge or real lack of compassion for their problem.
,# o Mr Ralph Fiebach
,- City of Erie (Cont'd) .
I suggested that if the temporary hook-up was considered from an engineering standpoint that it would probably require some keying arrangement whereby they could not physically oc electrically run parallel with us.
They will consider all propositions and be in touch in the near future.
The attitude was nost cordial. We discussed our plans for a firm electric smm supply beginning with the development of La Cygne Plant up to and' including
'<d La Cygne No. 2 and Uolf Creek. The bar graph on the phase-out cf KG&E's dependence on gas was of considerable interest to them. We met for approxi-mately 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. At the close of the meeting !!r Roger Kensinger, editor of the local paper and council menber, said it had been one of the most informative sessions he had attended in a long time and that our company was certainly to be commended for its advanced planning to cope with the fuel crisis.
.J WKC/vr I
cc - Messrs G U Evans F 11 Xinball E S Itall Ralph Foster i Joe Cumiskey l -
l
\\
l
\
I a
/ B.2-11
[
all Ruth at Wichita Club - 263-5271 morning of September 6, 1973 9/18 - Confirm number of people for lunch at Wichita Club. Tentatively set up for 10.
Planned menu: Prime rib (medium) 3 salad vegetable beverage and choice of dessert from cart Gg1 - R.2Il. p M4 -
i Mr John Rodkey A /l,f _ cl.is 6 s7~ll i' C 11 Cuernsey & Company
, Consulting Engineers P O Box 53247 oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105
Dear John:
This is to confirm a meeting with you, Charles Massey and of-i ficials of the city of Erie, Kansas regarding an interconnection 4 contract.
We ' dill be pleased to racet with you on September 18 at 10:30 an in the 5th floor conference room of our KG6L office building here in Wichita.
We're looking forward to seeing you and workinn out the details at that time.
4 Sincerely, a
WKC/vr cc - Messrs Bernard Ruddick, Vice President-Transmission and Distribution John Hansberry, Vice President-Engineering
- Ralph Longstaff, Superintendent of Meters j Joe Cumiskey, Division Manager R. PL . thy a bc - Messrs G W Evans Ra1 7h Fiebach
\ F M Kimball
\ Ralph Foster
. E S Hall a
4
?
i
- . o
- . B.2-12 qG
~
f ~# ' .h .
, 01 /t i t
.i
- 11. t ::a:Nsi y & ('mii.sxy
] . l'
(..s n u is. nsein si:u. .
I' vn c u s, oo. , m, oio m. u e m ,:n.. . .
g T c t.(405) S20 Jt3r .
Y December 28,1973 [ [I \ Lt f
SwY r.\
V
y*
Mr. Wilson Cadman h) w Vice President
- Te[COyr Kansas Gas and Electric Company 3 ,, g
' '5 '
' Wichita, Karms /G*f5q u h,'
u .f./
g
Subject:
City of Erie, Kansas ,-
Dear Mr. Cadman:
At a recent meeting with the governing body of the City of Erie, Kansas, I the electrical interconnection with KG&E was discussed. There are two points, houever, that need to be cleared up to everyone's satisfaction. These were dis-cussed at our meeting at your office, but it needs to be included either in the contract or as a supplement to the contract. The two points in question are as follovs:
f 1. In the event that the City should enter into on interconnection contract with KG&E at this time which involves the City building
{[gM the 69 KV transmission line and step-down substation, and at a later year decide to shut the Municipal Pouer Plant down and purchase
{( {'.11 all requirements from KG&E on a wholesale contract basis, will KG&E purchase from the City the 69 KV transmission line and
. associated substation? It is anticipated that the low voltage structure of the substation would remain the property of the City.
2 Assuming that the answer to the first question is yes, conditions for L'y the purchase by KG&E should be defined. Basically the terms desired by the City for the selling price of these facilities would be replace-ment cost value less 3% annual depreciation.
At your earliest convenience, please advise on these two matters and hoa they would be made a part of the contract. .
Sincerely yours, C. H. GUERNSEY & COMPANY
. , Yhz 97j '
Charles N. Massey CNM:il cc: Leroy Priest Ralph Nelson
/ B.2-13 4
i
.Tanuary 11, 1974 4
I
!!r Charles ? Massey C 11 Guernney & Company i P O aor. 53247 oklahoma City, Oklahor.a 73105
Dear Charlie:
i i
Please er.cuse ry tardy renponse to your letter of ')ece ebe r 28 re.cardine your two points in question on the proposed F.rie interconnection.
- 1. If the City decides to interconnect with KG&r. and build the 69 kv line necessary, we will purchase the line at sore future date should the City then decide to purchase power on a wholesale contract basis.
The line, of course, would have to be built to our specifications.
tie would also purchaos the substation.if it is 12 kv. Other secondary voltae,es would bn avoided because it complicates our apare situation.
Tsu r.ention that the low voltare structure of the substation would remain the property of tne City. My answer to that would La yes-(if 12 kv) and you racan associated switchit ear, etc.
- 2. Youaskedforuntodefinepurchaseconditionssupresti$nethenellinn price would he replacement cost value less 31 annual depreciation.
'le would pronose to purchase at original cost velu,e. less 3% annual deprecia* ion since this is all wn're allower! to include in our rate base for carnine purposca.
As to hov ve would comrit to such a poesible trnnsaction, it would be a sirple nstter of a side letter of nereecent crecuted by both parties.
Picane let me know if you have further questions.
Sincerely.
wxc/vr i cc "casrs i.e'oy Priene. ?fayor Ralph !*cison be - Messrs G W Evans E S Hall John Hansberry Ralph Fiebach W B Walker l
F M Kimball Bernard Ruddick l
1 . . . . . _ - ... _ _- .. _
I B.2-14 i osu ne l % KANSAS GAS AND CLECTRIC COMPANY
^ P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
= sucra,cammsw February 21, 1974 4
1 1
i 4 The lionorable LeRoy Priess i- Mayor Erie, Kansas 66733 l
Dear Mayor Priess:
This will serve as a letter of intent between the City of Erie, Kansas and Kansas Gas and Electric Company to execute a standard electric interconnection agreement.
j Said agreement will be forwarded to your attention for execu-tion on behalf of the City and returned to KC&E, The agreement will then be executed by our president on behalf of the company and filed with the Federal Power Commission.
In addition to the agreement, we will provide you with a sup-plementary letter spelling out other terms and conditions 9 regarding the interconnection and mutually agreed upon.
} Please sign in the appropriate place at the bottom of this
< letter. In addition the city clerk should attest and seal.
Sincerely, KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY By gg , h d2
_1 _
i.
1 :
) APPROVED AND ACCEPTED I i CITY OF ERIE, KANSAS -
I -
p By 1 [c/ cf hcM Mayor L > kstL City lerk l
WKC/vr i
i
$) ___-
j . .. ,o g f '. .% l ' ' ' N B.2-15
. A KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Bon 208 Wachsta, Kansas 67201 me uncrme co-a,v February 27/1974
/ \
/
/
O fir Charles Ma sey C 11 yuernso[& Corapany G P O Qou 5)247 Okl[op/ City, Oklahoma 73105
\
Subje'ts c Interconnection with the city of Erie J \
\
Daar Mr'Massey 9 s Attached is a copy of our document KA-7123, dated 11-12-71. This document describes the general conditions required for making a 69 KV connection to our system. Specifications of the major equipment and b' line hardware are also included. I believo that this will give you f sufficient information to proceed with writing specifications for the 69 KV lino extension to Erie.
Please note that because of the added nine miles of exposure to our
. s 69 Kv line, we will require an oil circuit breaker at Urbana. Since the fault currents at Urbana are not high, this circuit breaker re-quirement can be tact by usitig somothing similar to a !!cGraw-r:disat 69 Av reclosor. This recloser can ho platform mounted, and can even be obtained with a gas operator if you wish to go that route.
As to the specifications for the 69/12.5 Kv transformer, the same kind of specifications that were used for Neodesha would be satis-factory. We would like an opportunity to review these specifications before subtaitting to vendors. If you wish to use an auto transformer in order to provide the 69 Kv ground source, and to use a 2400 volt delta tertiary, we would havn no chjection to your using thi= 2400 vcit source to supply existing 2400 volt circuits at 1;rie.
For your information, the available three phase fault current at Urbana is 338 MVA at 69 Kv.
Mr Charles Masuoy February 27, 1974 Page 2 ;
tie would like to have the opportunity to review the one-line diagram of the Erie Substation when you have it prepared.
If you need additional information, please let me know.
G Yours very truly, J0ll:1 Il llMCERRY JIIH/ey Attach cc - Mr Ralph Nelson, City of Erie Mr Wilson Cadman, KG&E e
0
- . - - , , . - - . - - -- , , , , , . , -.. , , - , ,- ,~ , , - , - , , , , . , , , , ,.n. ,, ,-5, ,,n-- . .-
B.2-16 3 .
Mr Ralph Fiebach April 15, 1974 I-1 I had a call this morning from the Utility Superintendent, Erie , Kans as . Their engineers are estimating that it will cost $419,000 to build the necessary 69 kv line and substation for an interconnection.
Ile said that in reviewing their gas situation and looking at the present city debt, the council has formally acted and is
' requesting a wholesale contract. This, of course, will mean
- that KG&E will build a line and substation. I shall work out the details with Messrs Ruddick and llansberry.
i J
E A
WKC/vr cc - Messrs E S Hall Bernard Ruddick John Hansberry 1 J J Cumiskey
. .. B.2-17
- 1 l
l 4
i April 30, 1974 l I
1 l l
l Messrs C W Evans l Ralph Fiebach l E S Hall Bernard Ruddick 5
John Hansberry
, W B Walker Bill Whitmer R E Phillips Ralph Foster Joe Cumiskey i
I have attached a copy of a letter from Mayor Priess, City of Erie. He and his council have instructed us to provide power to the city through a wholesale agreement rather than an interconnection.
We will proceed in that direction.
1 i
1 1
l WKC/vr Attach cc - Legal Document File l
f g, '
CITY O F ERIE
- e. I'. O. Has ISG 221 South Main Eltl10. KANSAS GG733 Telephone (316) 21131G1 Mr. Wilson-Cadman April 23, 1974 Vice-President K.G.E.
P.O. 30X 208 Wichita, hansas 67201
Dear Wilson:
The mayor and city cot:r.cil has decided it is not feasible to make an interconnect, but we are willing to sign the wholesale con-tract offered a few months a6o. Ilowever tre hope a better arrangement for emer6ency power from R.E.A. can be established.
Please send a copy of your wholesale contract and your emer-gency arrangement with R.E.A. to Ralph Nelson, City Superintendent.
. e -l .Y s.- W k- Sc--
IAyor Councilman
, %d:4dN Councilman 014/ h +jgM c6en san' j n'N w k10 (.</I
' Councilman Y <//.Yl N vt/ Al Councilman " g' l .
, ,e sgg .
6 p-S '{
+ .
+ p* , .!
.v
. Q. , - /
B.2-18 May 31, 1974 Mr Wesley R Clendenen, Manager The Cooperative Electric Power &
Lioht Company, Inc
, 410 North State P O Box 326 lola, Kansas 66749
Dear Wes:
Early this week Mr Les Morgan, of our Engineering Department, visited with one of your folks about the 12 KV line running from Urbana substation by the City of Erie.
l This is in accord with yours and my conversation regarding a temporary .
l arrangement whereby we could make some emergency power available to i the city over your lines.
l Mr Morgan estinates that the line could carry an additional 600 to 800 KW. Because of the lack of load information on the line, the estimate could be either high or low; but he feels pretty comfortable with the 800 figure.
You indicated you would discuss the matter with your Board regarding transmission charges, etc. Please let me know what you have concluded, and we will work out the details with the Erie city officials.
Sincerely, WKC/kp cc - Mr Ralph Nelson, Superintendent of Utilities Mr Les Morgan bec - Messrs Ralph Fiebach John Hansberry Barney Ruddick R Phillips R Longstaff J J Cumiskey
B.2-19 )
1 HE ;00PERATlVE ~:l.ECTRIC ~3OlllERS_lcWT;0 llc.
P. O. Box 326 e Phone: (316) 365 5151 e tola Kansas 66749 WESLEY R. CLENDENEN General Manager June 7, 1974 Mr. Wilson Cadman, Vice-President Kansas Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
Dear Wilson:
With reference to your letter of May 31, 1974, regarding temporary arrangements for emergency power for the U iy of Erie, Kansas, I have discussed this matter with Mr. Ralph Nelson, Superintendent of the d Ci ty of Erie. Also, I have discussed the matter with our board of trustees at our last regular board meeting. We feel that one and one-half mills would be a fair transmissic,n charge and this was agreeable i
with Mr. Nelsen. Mr. Nelson advises me that this power will only be used when the load exceeds their generating capacity. We would, there-fore, like to have an agreement from your company waiving the Rights of i Cause in our Wholesale Power Contract.
If any further information is desired, please write me.
Sincerely yours, l
f ',
Wesley R. Clendenen nn
, ( '}tf( - -'&') "
L
,l,,l . j ( p, {d I0 !'Ab':
i 1
1 L
B.2-20 June 10,1974 l
1 I
Itr Wesley R Clendenen, Manager The Cooperative Electric Power
& Light Company Inc P O Box 326 Iola, Kansas 66749 1
Dear Wes:
Thanks for your response to the emergency situation at i
the City of Erie in helping us supply them temporary power until an interconnecLlon can be accomplished.
We will work out the details and be in touch shortly.
Sincerely, 1
l l
l
! WKC/vr cc - !!r Ralph Nelson, Superintendent I bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach
- G W Evans
- 1 E S Hall John Hansberry Joe Cumiskey l Bill Whitmer*
Robert Vohs*
l 1
Les Morgan *
- attach Mr Clendenen's letter i-
ea .n -
. B.2-21 g.
KANSAS GAS AND ELECilllC COAff'ANY h
v a auc, e can.-
I'.O. Uan s08 n ot hita, K.unus 61s'01 June 19, 19 4 b
~
N1 Dalph I'21 son U1.ility perintendent C: ty of Erio E e, Kansas 66733 Dea Ralphs j I belle that the detailo have about been worked out for supplying you temporary emergency power through the Cooperative 12 Kv circuit from Urbana Gubstation. To assist you in doing the work that will have to m be done on your system to make this interconnection, I would like to provide the following information.
14 plan to install the matering on the first polo away from the Coopora-tive line. If this in not convenient, it could be installed at somo other pole. KGr.C will provide and install all of the metering equipment, f m This will consist of a watthour meter and a printing demand meter.
We have available here in Wichita some 500 Kva ningin phane transfomers that I believe would be suitable in making the connection between the 12.5 Kv circuit and your 2400 volt system. Wo will earmark three Kuhlman transformers for this purposo which havo the following nameplato infor-mation 500 Kva, 7200-2400 volts; high voltage tars at 7200, 7920, 6840, 6660 and 6480. Each transformer weighs 7.160 lbs. The hoight to
\/ the top of the tank is 8'-3", and to the top of the bushings, 9'-4".
The tank diamoter is 52". The trancformers have an impedance of l 4.6%.
(
Please let me know if you would like any additional information that could help you in laying out the substation and doing the necessary lino work.
Yours very truly, ,
J0llN 11. IIANSBERRY Jllit/oy ,0 k ,,
t' 0 cc - Mr Wilson cachlu d .W.I m14 .
bc - Messrs E S Itall !5 g[C61 -
B Budd}ek h ytc,0N N I;Y .'
R Longstaff S l K Yoos
@D l n ziegler " e'N.0 % C'**,@
R E Phillips
,.' B.2-22 KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY July 5, 1974
.,on~. c . c. .
The Honorable LcRoy Pricas Mayor of Erie Erie, Kansas 66733 Dear Mayor Priesa Kansas Gas and F.lectric Cocipany has agreed to provide a temporary source of encre,ency po:cr through The Cooperative Electric Power & Lir,ht Company luc 12 kv circuit from brbana Substation. It is understood that this ar-rangement is predicated upon the City of Erie and Eausas Gas and Electric Company enteriny, into a standard Agreenent for hholesale Electric Service now being prepared.
In addition the City haa anrced to execute a sinple contract setting out
. the conditions and terus of the temporary emergency power supply. This agreement is also being prepared.
It is further understood that the City of 'iric uill pay a transnission charge to 'the Cooperative Electric Power L Lirht Coupany inc in the amount of 1.3 mills per kilowatt-hour for each hilowatt-hour transmitted over their systen.
The City needs a ter.porary transformer bank in order to make the emergency power supply possible. Kansau Gas and Electric Company has thrce Kuhlman 500 kva 12.5/7203-2400 volt transfortt.crs, corial nur.:bcra 904594, 984600, 984601, which can be cented to the City for the period designated in the temporary emers.cucy service agreement at the rate of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per tionth. It is understood that the City of Eric will pick up the trans-forriers, transport and install then at no expense to i ansas Cas and Electric Cocipany. Kansas Can and Electric Company agrees to load the transformers in Wichita.
The City assunes full responsibility for the transforn. ors from the tiac they cro loaded until the timo they are roturned to Kansas Gas and Electric Company's facilities. The City of Erie agreca to indemnify and hold harm-less Kansas Gas and Electric Company, its agents, servants and employees, and all other persons , firms or corporations from any and all liability, causes of action, claimn damages, expense or attorney fees arising out of the use of said transformers by any person, fim or corporation, whether with the consent of the City of Erie or otherwise, during the term of this rental agreement.
201 N. Atarket - Wschata, Kansas - Maol Address: P. O. Box 208 i Wichita, Karisas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 2641111
,e' Please sign in the space provided below if the above understanding by the City is correct. The transformers may be picked up from Kansas Gas and Electric Company upon our receipt of one executed copy of this letter.
Sincerely, KANSAS GAS AND ELECIRIC CO?TMiY O
By _ p[
.k, f)g, -
Ay #
APPROVr.D AMD ACCI'.PThD CITY OF Li1I;;, LCSAS f ..
& Dy.__b.6__..7.>& .
LJ"MJ
.fayor i
-_5.h.E$ . 2 - 8 IU
. Cit 4 Clerk 1
u WC/vr cc - 21r Ralph !!cison -
. . , ._~ . - ,
I B.2-23 1
l July 24, 1974 1
\ l j The Honorable LeRoy Friess i _
Mayor A Erie, Kansas 66733
Dear Hayor Priesa:
Our Pittsburg division manager, Mr Cumiskey, will be delivering to you shortly the following documents:
4 copies of Agreement (Temporary) 4 copies of ordinance and Affidavit of Publication i
He will explain how these documente should be executed and published in order to become official ordinances.
You will notice that the Agreement for a temporary connection over the lines of The Cooperative Elaetric Power & Light Company Inc provides for a one-year term with the option for a one-year renewal by KC&E. Mr Wesley R Clendenen, n General Manager of The Cooperative glectric Power & Light Company inc, has indicated that the Cooperative will charge the City 1.5 mills per kilowatt-hour for each kilowatt-hour transmitted over the Cooperative's line as a transMesion charge. This is the charge as discussed with Mr Balph Nelson and agreed upon as appropriate.
KC&E will add that amount to each Lilling for electric service to the City and reaiit same to the Cooperative.
I underctanu that t.he City has picked up the transformer bank which we have
, , agreed tc lease at a nominal charge and it is presently being installed for l
the temporary arrang sment until such time as a lir.s can be built to the City.
We hope this nessure is helpful and we are pleased that it could be worke/
out with the Cooperativa.
It is a pleasure for us to have the opportunity to provide power to your City on a wholesale basis and we know that the arrangement will be mutually baneticial over the years to come. Should you have further questions, please get in touch with me.
i Sincerely, WKC/vr cc - Messrs Was Clendenen Ralph Nelson bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach R E Phillips Bill Whitmer John Hansberry Ralph Longstaff Joe Cumiskey Bernard Ruddick W B Walker Ralph Foster / Bob Vohs i
B.2-24 July 24, 1974 Hr Wesley R Clendenen, Manager The Cooperative Electric Power
& Light Company Inc P O Box 326 Iola, Kansas 66749
Dear Wes:
I have attached an unexecuted copy of an Agreemen2 between the City of Erie, Kanssa and Kansas Gas and Electric Company M a temporary wholesale power connection. This provides for the transmission of up to 800 kilo-watts of capacity over your Urbana 12 kv line to the city on a teaporary basis as we have discussed and as agreed to in your letter of June 7, 1974. We will send you an executed copy of this Agreement when received.
That copy and this letter will serve as your authority to transmit the power under the conditions outlined.
^
As you have stipulated in your letter of June 7, we will collect from the city 1.5 nills per kilowatt-hour as your transmission charge. Please advise as to your preference for payment. We can either remit as a sep-arate item or apply to your electric service accounts with us.
Sincerely, I
- ,o .'
f ,
- , e !.-) I '
f r/ i b
._ - l19h <
n
.. l i/
q ' '} , , ) , )
WKC/vr I3, 3 Attach i 'I cc - Mayor LeRoy Priess . \ k ..
Mr Ralph Helson I' , ..
bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach 5 John Hansberry I Bernard Ruddick R E Phillips Ralph Longstaff W B Walker Bill Whitmer Joe Cumiskey Ralph Foster / Bob Vohs
i B.2-25 )
October 24, 1974 Mr Ralph Nelson, Superintendent City of Erie Erie, Kansas 66733
Dear Ralph:
We have further discussed the changes that you have made in the Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service which was presented to the city for execution last July. Our conclusion is that this is a standard contract which we have with a number of wholesale accounts. It is not in our best interest to have all kinds of variations in these contracts. Ccasequently, Mr Cumiskey will be delivering to you the necessary documents to r,
be considered by the Council and executed if you so desire, The only changes suggested by you which are appropriate have to do with the request for the increased maximum and minimum, the initial voltage at the point of delivery and your choice of language for the delivery point.
As we mentioned in our letter of July 24, Mr Cumiskey will be happy to explain the handling of the ordinance and the publi-cation thereof.
Sincerely, i
i WKC/vr bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach j John Ransberry i
Bernard Ruddick I R E Phillips Ralph Longstaff W B Walker Bill Whitmer l' Joe Cumiskey l Ralph Foster
B.2-;%
l l
November 15, 1974 Mr Wesley R Clendenen, Manager The Cooperativa Electric Power
& Light Company Inc l P O Box 326 lola, Kansas 66749
Dear Was:
The temporary tap for the City of Erie was energized in late afternoon Monday, Kovember 11, 1974. I have attached an executed copy of the agree-ment covering The Cooperative Electric Power & Light Company's Inc par-ticipation in this arrangement.
I believe you had a conversation with our Mr till Whitner inst July regarding the Erie load's effect on the ratchet clause in your contract with us. This is to confirm that we will not, of course, penalize your Cooperative with the ratchet provision in the event the Erie load affects it. We will make appropriate adjustments.
You indicated that the transnission charge should be credited to your account with us. Wo will apply that credit on your next bill at the rate of 1.5 mills per kilowatt-hour used by the City of Lrie.
- Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Sincerely, l
l l VKC/vr Attach -
cc - Mayor LeRoy Priosa Mr llansberry: We are now ready to budget, Mr Ralph Nelson engineer and construct the necessary line bc - Messrs G W Evans and substation for permanent service. Pleass Ralph Fiebach advise when you are ready to discuss.
John Hansberry Bernard.Ruddick WKC/vr R E Phillips Ralph Longstaff W B Walker Bill Whitmer Fred Knodle Joe Cumiskey j Ralpa Foster / Bob Vohs
be: !!cesra. Joe Cumiskey G. Evans /R.Ficbach/D. Evens E.S.li 11/G.K aster 4E B.2-U W.Cadman
) W.B. Walker /J.Skelton n .uem.ce - , . _ , . , _ _
g R.E. Tate /J.Klassen/M. Shank H.Mac n N.Pinkstaff November 22, 1974 R.Ph111ips
....u.c.
.............. .. important Document Files Mr. Fred B. Adam, Director Utilitics Division State Corporation Commission 4th Floor, State Of fice Building Topeka, Kansas 66612 Agreement for Whoicsale Plectric Service dated November 7, 1974 with the City of Eric, Kansas Initial Filing .
Dear Mr. Adam:
In accordance with the Commission's Docket No. 39524U, we enclose three copics of the captioned Agreement. Each Agree-ment includes a copy of Rate Schedule PWM-173 and Service Regula-tions.
An executed copy of the Agreement has been furnished to Mr. LeRoy Pricss, Mayor, City of Erie, Kansas, 66733.
Picase return one copy of the Agreement showing the Commission's filing data.
Verytrylyyou/s, fj/l' . ..m l' y '
- 'OBill Wt-t .[ U ih W H .
Whitmer Manager of Rates WBW:BW:cid Encl.
O .
.,,~.,,..,-n~,,,,,-,,,-,,,...a,,,, , n ~,.. ,,,,,, ,,,,, _ ,,,, ,, ,,,,c ,,,,,,, ,,,.,,,, .
~~. G. Evans /R.Fiebach/D. Evans
~
B.2-28 E.S.Ilall/G.Kcester W.Cadman
~
W.B. Walker /J.Skelton R.E. Tate /J.Klassen/M. Shank li.Macklin/N.Pinkstaff
'( h ,,,,,,t,,,
November 22, 1974 R.Phillips
..............u. Important Document Files
/ & htU Mr. Kenneth . Plumb, Secretary Federal Po r Commission 20426 Washlagto , D. C.
Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service dated November 7, 1974 with the City of Erie, Kansas Initial Filing
Dear Mr. Plumb:
In accordance with the Commission's Regulations, we submit the following pursuant to:
Part 35, Sec. 35.12, Filing of Initial Rate Schedules, Par. (a):
(1) Enclosed is a copy of this letter, two copies of the Agreement dated November 7, 1974 including a copy of the Company's Rate Schedule PWM-173, Service Regulations, Title Page and a check for
$100 to cover the filing fee.
(2) Initial service was rendered November 11, 1974.
(3) Copies of the Agreement have been furnished to:
(i) Mr. LeRoy Prfess, Mayor City of Eric Erie, Kansas 66733 (ii) Mr. Fred Adam, Director Utilities Division State Corporation Commis.aion 4th Floor, State Office Building Topekc, Kansas 66612 (4) Both parties have executed this Agreement.
(5) Electric sarvice to public utilitics for resale to ultimate consumers.
(") -
201 N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Ma:I Address: P. O. Box 208 / Wichits Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 2641111
fir. Kennsth F. Plumb, Secretary Page 2 November 22, 1974 O Par. (b)
(1) Attached is a statement showing estimated billing
-data by months for the twelve months succeeding the initial service date.
(2) (i) Charges for electric service are based on
' Company's Standard Rate Schedule PWM-173.
(ii) Not applicabic.
(3) Tlic Company currently serves customers on its PWM-173 tarif f under the following FPC Rate Schedule Nos. 32, 55, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 124 and 125.
(4). A system map is attached showing the point of
~
delivery.
Please advise us when the rate schedule number is assigned-to this new Agreement.
O Very tru y yourc, Y'~ ,.fi.
.D /
l Bill Whitmer ,
Manager of Rates WBW:BW:cid Encl.
1 (16
. _ . - - - _ _ _ . _ - . . . _ . . . . _ , - - . _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . . _. .m .
~
KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPA'!Y Electric Service to Erie, Kansas 66733 a
Estimated Billing under the Agreement for the twelve months . succeeding the date of' Initial Service Estimated Billing (Amounts of Power: Minimum 800 kw; Maximum 2,600.kw)
Demand Consumption Gross Fuel Net Month Billing Adjustment Billing
_ KW KWH 1974 Nov. 1,100 486,527 $ 5,332.37 $ 547.34 $ 5,879.71-Dec. 1,100 506,952 5,478.69 675.26 6,153.95 1975 558,310 5,961.02 827.42 6,788.44 Jan. 1,200 Feb. 1,100 548,200 .5,746.80 856.84 6,603.64 Mar. 1,000 453,880 4,985.22 750.26 5,735.48 ,
Apr. 1,000 488,110 5,207.72 1,672.26 6,879.98 1,200 432,610 4,972.14 1,463.09 6,435.23 May Jun. 1,600 555,246 6,271.49 807.88 7,079.37 Jul. 2,400 793,440 8,853.36 2,447.22 11,300.58 Aug. 2,200- 753,130 8,333.35 2,441.65 10,775.00 Sep. 2,100 641,090 7,349.33 2,170.09 9,519.42 Oct. 1,200 470,774 5,281.27 670.38 5,951.65 6,693,269 $73,772.76 $15,329.69 $89,102.45 Total -
=
w - ---
AGREEllENT Tills AGREE 11ENT Made and entered into this h day of Lg/m v, 1974 by and between the City of Erie, Kansas, First Party, and Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Second Party, ,
WITNESSETH:
WilEREAS the City of Erie, Kansas is suf fering from a potential O., electric power shortage; and, ,
WilEREAS said potential electric power shortage could become critical during the summer months of 1974; and, Wi!EREAS in order to avert a critical power shortage, the City of Erie, Kansas wishes to purchase from Kansas Ga's'and Electric Company wholesale power under KG&E's PWM-173 rate schedule; and, WilEREAS KG6E at the present time does not have facilities to provide such wholesale power to the City of Eric, Kansas from its Urbana Substation; and, WilEREAS The Cooperative Electric Power & Light Company, Inc.
presently has a 12 kv line originating at the said KG6E Urbana Substation and passing within a short distance of the City of Erie; and, WilEREAS provided that the City of Erie, Kansas agrees to purchase
, wholesale power from KG&E under the said company's PWM-173 rate schedule, KG&E is willing and does hereby consent to The Cooperative Electric Power
& Light Company, Inc. transmitting power to the City of Erie, Kansas over the hereinbefore described 12 kv line for a period of one year from the date of this contract, with KG&E's option to renew for one year the said transmission arrangement at the end of the term of this contract; and, WHEREAS the wholesale power supplied to the City of Erie, Kansas.
across the 12 kv line of The Cooperative Electric Power & Light Company,
v . ',-
Inc. will be metered so as to compute the wholesale power used by the City of Erie; and, Wi!EREAS it is understood by KG6E that The Cooperative Electric Power & Light Company, Inc. 's said 12 kv line will carry 800 kw of additiondl load, the same being sufficient to avert the critical power shortage in the City of Erie, Kansas.
TilEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the Parties hereto that KG6E is willing to provide the City of Eric, Kansas with wholesale power pursuant to said company's PWM-173 rate schedule, PROVIDED HOWEVER that at the present time KG6E does not have transmission lines constructed to the City of Eric and until same are completed, KG6E, agrees to allow The Cooperativc Electric Power & Light Company, Inc. to transmit power from.the Urbana Sub-station to the City of Erie, Kansas over said cooperative's 12 kv line, and in no event is said transmission arrangement to exceed one year from the date hereof unless, at KG6E's sole option, said transmission arrangement is extended for an additional one year.
It is further agreed that unless KG6E exercises its hereinabove option to continue the transmission arrangement, the City of Erie will be supplied with wholesale power under the company's PWM-173 rate schedule one year from the date hereof by means of new construction by KG6E from its present Urbana Substation to the City of Erie, Kansas.
Witness our hands and seals the dato and year first above written.
KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY S
ATTEST: I'j
- By , % .
~
g -m _
r; t f g Vic h resident i - h* ty Secretary
'.s-CITY OF ERIE, KANSAS l
q i ATTEST:
s ,Y p By ,[ [>w g , j
/ Mayor j p]
City C rk 1
l 9
.-..,y y .---,-,-,,c,,-e,, .y
,,w -
,--,,,,r,-w,- m, n- - - - -, ,,.m -< ,.--,..,,c -,w.', - . = , , .* . , _ -
I .
AGREEMENT FOR W110LESALE ELECTRIC SERVICE THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this [f/r, day of ,
1974, by and between the City of Erie, Kansas, hereinaf ter referred to as
" City," and Kansas Gas and Electric Company, a corporation, its successors and assigns, hereinaf ter referred to as " Company."
WITNESSETil,: City and Company hereby agree as follows:
, 1. Company will supply and City will take from Company and pay for, all electric power and energy required for use in or in connection with City's electric system and other services. Such supply'is to be in accordance i
with the terms and provisions hereinaf ter set out and with Company's Rate Schedule PWM-173, and Company's Service Regula ions, both of which are on file with the Kansas State Corporation Commission and with the City Clerk of the City, and both of which are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this agreement. Company's Rate Schedule PWM-173, as well as its Service Reg-b ulations, is expressly subject to change pursuant to orders of the State Corporation Commission or aay other governmental body having jurisdiction.
Any such change so ordered or approved shall affect this agreement only with respect to the portion or subject matter so changed, all other portions or provisions remaining in full force and ef fect, both parties reserving the right to contest the validity of any such orders or approvals in the courts.
- 2. The City agrees that its requirements for electric power and energy will not exceed 2600 kilowatts, which amount is the maximum Company is obligated to supply hereunder. City agrees that it will receive and pay for not less than 800 kilowatts.
\ b .
- 3. Electric power and energy delivered shall be in the form of three-phase, four-wire, alternating current at approximately 60 cycles and approximately 2,400 volts at point of delivery.
- 4. The point of delivery for the power and energy to be supplied shall be: The power plant of the City of Erie, near the east part of town. Company is authorized to construct and maintain its lines and equip-ment in or over the streets, alleys, and public places of the City for the purpose of connecting with the City's system at such point of delivery.
- 5. Service supplied hereunder shall not be resold by City in territory outside the City and served by the Company, nor shall it be sold' by City to any other party for subsequent resale. This provision shall not apply to temporary emergencies.
- 6. Company will not be liable for interruption or f ailures to supply service when such failures are due to action of elements, accidents, acts of third parties, strikes, fuel shortages, or other causes beyond Company's control.
- 7. Bills for electric power and energy supplied pursuant to this agreement become due and payable at the office of the Company in Pittsburg, Kansas, when rendered.
- 8. The term of this Agreement shall be for ten (10) years from y/ wedtt/ // , 1974, and shall extend automatically for an additional period of ten (10) years unless either party hereto shall notify the other in writing not more than ninety (90) days nor less than sixty (60) days prior to[&Wedu'vM 19es, of its desire to terminate this agreement. -
- 9. Each party hereto will defend, indemnify, and save harmless the other party against liability, loss, costs and expense on account of any injury or damage to persons or property occasioned on or adjacent to its
's i facilities on.its own respective side of the point of delivery, unless such inj ury or damage was caused by the sole negligence of the other party; provided, however, that each party will defend, indemnify and save harmless the other party against liability, loss, costs and expenses resulting from injury to or death of its own employees, accurring while such employees are engaged in the line of their duties, whether or not such empicyees be harmed
( on the property of, or on or adjacent to the facilities of the other party, unless due in whole or in part to negligence of such other party without neg-ligence on the part of the employer of the person injured or killed; provided that if an employee of either party is injured or killed as a result of negligence of both parties the liability and expense shall be borne equally one-half by each party.
- 10. This agreement, upon its becoming ef fective, shall supersede and take the place of all prior agreements for this electric service and pg shall be considered as terminating, by mutual agreement, subject to all i
rights and liabilities of either party theretofore incurred thereunder, all such prior agreements for this Wholesale Electric Service.
- 11. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective successorr, assigns, and legal represencatives of the parties hereto, but no assignment by City shall be binding upon Company until accepted in writing by the latter.
IN WITNisSS WilERliOF, the parties hereto liave caused tlnis agreement to be executed on the date above set forth, the same being the date the Ordinance in which this is embodied becomes effective. CITY OF ERIE, KANSAS ATTEST: . Lly % We '~f 'f rs.#
#El2) ist ""' '
City rk
.r i
KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- 'h
- ArTEST:
/ ) , )r- g.,
I By b
. W Yhiq) President , g ./ a Secretary i
t e ) 't t
. . - _ . . - . _ . . _ . _ . . _ . - - ... . . _ _ _ _ . - . . . _ - - , _ . - . . _ . ~ _ . _- - , ,
Form 3060 KANSAS CAS Af@ f.ljTlHIC C0t1PANY RATE SCitEtt!!F. lWM-17) PUBLIC UTILITY RF. SALE APPLICATION To the entire electric service requirements supplied under Company's standard Agreement for Electric
$stwice to Public Utilities contracting for 10 kw or more for Resale.
Service supplied hereunder shall not be resold within the territory served by Company, Not applicable to standby or breakdown service. CILARACTER OF SERvlCE Service is at approximately 60 cycles and at such phase and voltage as' Company may have ova'11able. NET MONTHLY RATE
-$2.20 for the first 1,000 kw of Demand including 150 kwh per kw of Demand $1.65 for the next 4,000 kw of Demand including 150 kwh per kw of Demand $1.50 for all additional kw of Demand including 150 kwh per kw of Demand 1.03c per kwh for the next 150 kwh per kw of Demand 0.81c per kwh for the next 150 kwh per kw of Demand 0.65c per kwh for all additional kwh Transmission service: For customers taking service at 66,000 volts or hid er, h the Demand charge will be reduced 15c per kw per month.
Fuel Adjustment: Hinus or plus 0.0109c per kwh for each Ic or fraction ' thereof by which the average cost per million Stu of fesell fuels used at the Company's electric generating stations dJring the next pre. ceding month is less then, or exceeds 24c per million Btu. The factor will be determined by multiplying the
. increase above 24c or the decrease below 24c by 0.0109c and by the ratio of net kilowatthours generated by fossil fuelo to net kilowatthours generated and purchased in that month. . Such average costs determined in accordance with the Federal Power Commission's Uniform System of Accounts, will be as shown by the Company's books including transportation equipment costs to unloading point.
Minimum Bill: The Demand chs Je. Tax Adjustment: When any city, town or taxing authority imposes a franchise, occupation, gross receipts, business, sales, license, excise, privilege or similar tax upon the electrical operations of thin Company within said city, town or taxing authority boundary, the amount thereof shall be charged to cach customer within said city, town or taxing authority boundary, in the same form in which it is imposed on the Company. All such taxes so imposed on this Company shall be added as a separate charge to customer's bill for electric service. Any particular class of customer exempted from said tax by said city, town or taxing authority in the calculation of said tax upon the Company shall be exempt from the adder contemplated herein. ] PCMAND The average kw supplied during the _15 11nute period of maximum use during the month, as shown by or coa.puted from the readings of Company's deeand meter, but not less than the minimum kw specified in the Agreement for Electric Service. CROSS MONTHLY BILL The Net Mor.thly Bill, computed in accordance with the Net Monthly Race, plus 5% on the first $200 and 2% on the balance thereof. FAYENT The Net Monthly Bill is due and payable when rendered; when not paid within 15 days from date, the Cross Monthly Bill applies. CONTRACT TERLOD One year, or longer at Company's option. (over)
COMMISSION AND OTifER APPHOVAL .' 11 c rates and any terms nr condit ions provided herein are subject ta changrs or substitutions. c i t he r ,, in whole or in part, made f rom t ime t o t ime by a legally effective filing of the Corpany with, or by order of, the regulatory authority having jurisdiction, and the Company reserves the right to seek unilatcrally changes or substitutions, in accordance with law, from such regulatory authority. , EERVICE RECT'tATIONS Service under this schedule is subject to the Service Regulations of Company at present on file with the Kansas State Corporation Commission and any modifications thereof lawfully made. ,
e (*
*t , KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SEltVICE IIEGULATIONS -
APPLYING TO TIIH SUPPLYING AND TAKING OF ALL CLASSES OF ELECTitlC SEltVICE GENEllAL STATEMENT
!. l'urpose of Service Itegulations: These Service Itegulations are designed to govern the supplying and taking of electric service in such manner as will s(cure to cach Customer the greatent practicable latitude in the enjoyment of his service that is con 31 stent with good service and safety to Customers and the Company. They are subject to revision from time to time and supersede and cancel all previous regulations pertaining to the supplying and taking of Company's electrie *,crvice.
- 2. Applicabliity: These Service llegulations, and any modifications thereof and additions thereto lawfully made, are applicable to all Service Agreements now existing or which may be entered into by Company and to all llate Schedules which from time to time may be lawfully fixed.
- 3. Conflicts: If a provision of these Service !!cgulations conflicts with any provision of a Itate Schedule or a Service Agreement, the specine provision of the Itate Schedule or Service Agreement will prevail.
- 4. Filing anf Availability: Copics of these Service Itegulations are on file with the Kansas State Corporation Commission and at cach otfice of the Company and may be obtained without charge upon request at any office of the Company.
DEFINITIONS The following expressions when used in these Service llegulations,in Itate Schedules and in Service Agreements. unless otherwise stated in an approved Itate Schedule or executed Service Agreement, will have the meanings stated below:
- 5. Customer: Any individual, partnership, association, firna, public or private corporation or governmeatal agency using Company's electric service at a stated location under a Service Agreement.
G. Com pany: Kansas Gas and Electric Company.
- 7. Sersice Agreement: The written Agreement or contract between Company and Customer pursuant to which electric service is supplied and accepted.
- 8. Electric Service: The supplying of electric service by Company consists of the maintaining by it. at the point of delivery, of a source of electric supply, at approximately the standard voltage and frequency for the class of service rendered, ad(quate to meet the Customer's requirements as stated or implied in the Service Agreement,irrestective of whether or nat Customer makes use of such service.
- 9. Point of Delivery: The point where Company's wires are joined to Customer's wires or rapparatus unless some other point of delivery is specified in the Service Agreement.
l 10. Bletering Installation: The meter or meters together with auxiliary devices, if any, installed by Company to
- i measure elec tric power and energy supplied to an individual customer at a single point of delivery.
- 11. Storth: An interval of approximately 30 days, unless the calendar month is specified in the Service Agreement.
- 12. Cinne of Notice: Except as otherwise spec: tied, when notice is required to be given to Customer, it will be deemed autTicient if delivered to Customer or Customer's agent in charge of the premises served, or if mailed to Customer's f ast known address, as shown by the records of the Company, and when notice is required to be given to the Company it will be given in writing, delivered or mailed, addressed to the Company at its office where bills for service were last paid.
SEltVICE AGItEEMENTS
- 13. Form and lisecution of Service Agreement: Any form of written application containing in itself, or by reference, the full terms of the agreement for service, when signed by the Customer and accepted by Company, and any form of written agreement for electric service when executed by the Company and Customer is a Service Agreement and is a 1iriding contract between Company and Customer.
- 14. Term of Service Agreements: Service Agreements are etTertive for initial periods of one year, unless other.
wise ptovided in the Agreement, and are automatically renewed upon cach expiration date for a period equal to the initial term unless otherwise provided in the Agreement or, within not Irss than sixty (GO) days prior to any expira-tion date, either party gives notice to the other of its intention to terminate the Agreement.
- 15. Une of Optional Fate Schedules: Where two or muse optional llate Schedules are applicable to the class of ,
service taken, Customer may elect to be billed under any one of such Schedules, and may later substitute any other such applicable Schedule in the Service Agreement after the date of the next meter reading, by notifying Company in writing, provided that but one such change may be made in any period of twelve months. *
- 16. Use of Improper Rate Schedule in a Service Agreement: Bills rendered under a Rate Schedule which is not applicable to the class of service supplied, will be recalculated in accordance with the lowest prolictly applicable Rate Schedule. Excess amounts paid by Customer will be refunded by Company or any balance duc Company will be paid by Customer,
- 17. Company's Hight to Suspend Service or to Cancel Service Agreement: Upon any default or breach of a Service Agreement or any violation of these Service Regulations by Customer, Company reserves the right,in addition to any and all other legal remedies, either temporarily to discontinue electric service until such condition has been remedied or to cancel the Service Agreement. Except where the fault involves a hazard to public safety or Company's property or operations, or jeopardizes electric service to other Customers, Company will give Customer written notice of its intent to suspend service and/or cancel the Agreement, setting forth the portion of the Service Agreement or these Service Regulations that has been violated and allowing Customer 48 hours in which to correct the breach or default. Failure of Company either to suspend the supply of service or to terminate the Service Agreement or to resort to any other legal remsdies available, will not affect the Company's right to resort thereafter to any one or more of such remedies for the same or any future default or breach by Customer.
- 18. Cancellation of Service Agreement by Customer: Whenever a Customer no longer requires any electric service or any power service in any form for the purposes mentioned in the Service Agreement and presents evidence of this fact which is reasonably satisfactory to the Company, Customer may cancel his Service Agreement upon ten (10) days written notice to the Company subject to the provisions of the Rate Schedule and/or any special terms included in the Service Agreement and of Par.19 hereof.
- 10. Rate Schedule and Hilling Corrections Upon Cancellation of Service Agreements: When a Service Agreement containing a Hate Schedule with a term discount is cancelled beinre the expiration of such term, either by Customer or by Company for cause, previous billa to Customer will be recalculated upon the basis properly applicable to the term during which service has been supplied prior to such canceliation. The difference between the total of the bills calcu-lated on the short term basis and the total of the bills previously paid by the Customer will be due and payable to the Company in addition to all other amounts which may be due Company on account of breach of contract.
- 20. Change of Occupancy: When change of occupancy takes place on any premises supplied by the Company with electric service, written notice thereof will be given at the office of the Company not less than three (3) days prior to the date of change by the outgoing party, who will be held responsible for all electric current supplied on such premises until such written notice is received.
- 21. Assignment of Service Agreements: Service Agreements will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties thereto, but an assignment by Customer will not be binding upon Company unless accepted in writing by Company.
SUI'I' LYING AND TAKING OF SEltVICE
- 22. Suppl3ing of Service: Electric service will be supplied by Company only under and pursuant to these Service Regulations and any modifications or adihtions thereto lawfully made and such applicable Rate Schedules as from time to time may be lawfully fixed. Service wdl be supplied under a given Rate Schedule only at such points of delivery as are adjacent to facilitics of Company adequate and suitabic, as to capacity und voltage, for the service desired. Other-wise, special agreements between Customer and Compary may be required. Taking of electric service by Customer will constitute acceptance of and agreement to conform to these regulations.
- 23. Continuity of Service: Company will use reasonable ddigence to supply steady and continuous electric service at the point of delivery, but will not be liabic to Customer for any damages occasioned by irregularitics or interruptions,
- 24. Suspension of Service for Repairn and Changes: In order to make repairs to or changes in Company's facilities for supplying electric service, Company reserves the right, without incurring any liability therefor, to suspend service for such periods as may be reasonably necessary, and in such manner as not to inconvenience Customer unnecessarily.
9 2f,. I.imitatinn nf INc: Elutric service or energy supplied by Company wun ne unit hy Customer only for the purposes specified in the Scavice Agreement ami auch use will be subject to the limiantnins contained in the applicable Rate Schedule and these Service ikgulations. When polyphase service is supplied by Company, Customer's load will be 'I maintained in reasonable electrical balance between phases at point of delivery. Single phase motors in excess of 7% horsepower capacity will not be served without specific approval by Company.
- 26. liighly Fluctuating I.nads: Customer will not employ or utiliw any equipn.cnt, appliance or device so as lo affect adversely Company's service to Customers. Where Customer uses electric service for the operation of hoists, wchling machines. Lray machines, clectric furnaces or other equipment with intermittent or rapidly fluctuating load characteristics which adversely affect voltage regulation or impair Company's service to Customers, Custorr.cr may be required to install and maintain at his own expense suitabla apparatus to reasonably limit the effect of such fluctuation and/or Company may adjust the billing basis provided in the Itate Schedule or Service Agreement to compensate for the necessary power capacity required to serve such equipment.
- 27. Thef t or Diversion of 1:lectric Service: In any case of tampering or interfering with the proper functioning of a meter installatien or evidence thereof, or any theft of electric service or any diversion of service for purposes which are prohibited or restricted by the terms of the Itate Schedule or Service Agreement, Company reserves the right to discontinue service immediately and Customer will be liable to prosecution under applicable 15ws. Company will be entitled to collect from Customer, at the appropriate rate, for all power and energy not recorded on the meter by reason of such tampering,inte-fering or other theft or diversion of service,in an amount which may be estimated by the Company from the best available data, together with all expenses incurred by the Company on acerant of such unauthorized act or acts. In addition to the above, Company may require Customer to provide at Customer's cost a meter installation as specified by Company.
- 28. Customer To Furnish Itight-of Way: Customer will make or procure conveyance to Company for right-of-way, satisfactory to Compeny, across property owned or controlled by Customer, for the construction, orrration and maintenance of Company's facilitics necessary or incidental to the supplying of electric service to Customer.
- 20. Access to Customer's l't:mises: Duty authorized agents of Company will have access at all reasonabla bours to premises of Customer for any purpose incidental to the supplying of electri service.
- 0. Customer Shall l'rotect Company's l'ruperty
- Customer will protect all Company-owned facilcles en Cus.
tomer's premises and will permit only Company's agents or persons authorized by law to inspect or handle such property. Customer will be responsible for any loss or davge to such property of Company resulting from careless. ness, neglect or misuse by Customer or other unauthorized i.ersons. CUSTOMER'S INSTALLATION
- 31. Customer'n Installation: All wiring, appliances and apparatus for the utilization of electric service on Cus.
tomer's side of the point of delivery will be furnished by Customer unless otherwise provided for in the Service Agreement or applicable !! ate Schedule and shall conform to alllaws and ordinances governing such installations.
- 32. Location of Customer's Service Terminals: Customer's service terminals will be installed in accudance with Company's Service Standards and so located as to be readily accessible for connection to Company's service lines at a point to be determined by Company.
- 33. Changen in Custamcr'n Installation: As Company's facilitics for supplying ch ctric service to a Customer may have a limited capacity, Customer will not make any material changes or increases In Customer's utilization equipment until such change or increase has been approved in writing by Company.
- 31. rustomer's Itc ponsibility: Customer will be responsible for all electrical widne and eqmpment on Customer's side of the point of delivery and shall save the Company harmless against all claims for injuries and/or damages to persons or property resulting from the supplying and taking of electric service or the use thereof on Customer's &!de of the point of delivery.
- 35. Inspection by Company: Company reserves the right, but does not assume the duty, to inspect Customer's installation at any time and to refuse to supply or to continue electric scevice whenever Company considers Customer's installation not to le in good operating condition, but Company does not assume any responsibility in connection with such installation or the inspection thereof.
. , . F 1
- 36. Service to Contiguous l'reperty: Except with the written consent of Company, Customer will not extend, or connect his installation to lines across or under a street, alley, lane, court, avenue or other public or private space, in order to obtain service for adjacent property through one meter, even though such adjacent property be owned by Customer.
j METERING
- 37. Nietering Installation: Company will supply the metering installation needed to measure the electric service used by Customer. Customer will provide and maintain free of expense to Company a location for the installation thereof in accordance with Company service standards.
- 38. Evidence of Com,umption: The registration of Company's meters will be accepted and received at all times and places as prima facie evidence of the amount of power and/or energy taken by Customer.
- 39. Standard of Accuracy: Company will test its meters and maintain an accuracy of registration l'n accordance with good practice. Whenever the average registration of a meter is found by tent to be more than 2% " fast" or as low," the error will be corrated. If the registration of a meter is found to vary in excess of 2% from normal, corresponding corrections may be made in Customer's billing but such corrections will not extend beyond ninety (90) days prior to the date the error is discovered.
f BILLING
- 40. Hillirg I'eriods: Bills for electric service ordinarily will be rendered at monthly intervals, but such intervals may be either more or less than a month, at Company's option. If bills are rendered more frequently thsn monthly, the total of the minimum ch'.rges included in such bills for any one month will not exceed the monthly minimum specified in the applicable Itate Schedule.
41, One Sleter l'er Point of Delivery: Whenever Company is called upon to furnish two or more metering 1*n stalla. tions for one Custonwr, each such installation will be considered as a separate point of delivery and bills will be separately calculated therefor.
- 42. Payment of Ilills: Payment of a bill for electric service is made when the full amount due is received by an authorised agent of the Company at Company's office stated in the Service Agreement before the closing hour of j such o1Tice; except that payments by mail properly stainped and addressed will be considered as made upori the date and hour of the postmark, and payments deposited after os! ice heurs in a drop box installed at a Company office, will h
be considered as made upon the business day next preceding that upon which the box :s opened. Payments due on Sunday or a legal holiday will be considered as made when due if received on the next succeeding bm.iness day.
- 43. Delinquent flills: All bills rendered become delinquent upon the expiration of the net rate period and if not paid within such period, service may be disconnected upon 48 hours written notice to Customer. When service is disconnected for nonpayment of bills, it will not be reconnected until the gross bill together with any expense for disconnecting and reconnecting the service are paid. Nonreceipt of bills by Customer will not release or diminish the 4 obligation of Customer with respect to payment thereof.
DEPOSITS
- 44. When Hequired: Company may require a deposit or guarantee in such amount as Company may consider necessary to secure the payment of bills as they mature. Such a deposit or guarantee may be required either prior to beginning service or at any time thereafter and snay be held by Company until final setdement of Customer's accounts, af ter which any balance remaining will be held subject to Customer's order, trithout interest from the date of final settlement.
- 45. Application of Deposits: If Customer shall fail to pay any bill within the discount or ret rate period shown '
thereon, Company may apply Customer's deposit upon such delinquent bills and, upon 48 hours written notice, may discontinue service until the deposit is restored and the reconnection fee la paid.
- 46. Interest: When Customer's deposits as security for the payment of bills are held by Company for more than ninety (90) days, Company will pay simple interest thereon, at not less than the legal rate on service deposits of 4% per annum, untd e;ther the service is terminated or deposit is refunded. Interest normally will be paid at the time of final settlement of Cu tomer's account unless Customer requests payment annually.
*lhe State Corporation Comminion of Kansan IEcctine September I,131% l'iled and Apprnved October 3.1915.
Superse,le* Itrgulations t'ded April 21, 193!4
O e - B.2-29
. ,5
b .f 1,,u. - a.a@.
' m ,..$g& *4,MWw a '
9
~
CO8tRt 8. DOCKING Cover **r ., fi4fC Oll10rillIUll 0198918503$018 CAtt E. SAf rit$ Cf oismen Co=='anoa., Fourth Flocr, State Office Bldg. Jutts V. COff VI ANON A. litOBERG Commiss'eaer TOPEKA, AANSAS 66612 THttMA M. KNUT50N $wefeer JAufs f. wnts c... co.. .' Utilities Division December 3, 1974 In the matter of Kansas Gas and Electric Company filing an Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service, 74U236 dated November 7, 1974, with the City of Erie, Kansas Mr. W. B. Walker, Secretary and Controller
- Kansas Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201
Dear Mr. Walker:
Your above-captioned matter has been before the Commission and was approved November 26, 1974. We are enclosing one (1) copy of your Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service, dated November 7, 1974, with the City of Erie, Kansas with the Commission's approval data thereon.
, e Ver fr$ly p urs, . -9 - ;. ~ - - .
e $/
.~- -j . y (,.'ff,7 vi:a.g t
Fb d B. Adami.7 7 -
~ /h !. Directorb's of Utilitie GDD/dna Enclosure b '
,. ' FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Washington, D. Co 20426 a.2-30 h ]C lN REPLY REFER TOs PWR.RC Docket No. E - 9128 Iansas K Gas and Electric Company /**; I I L e Attention: Mr. Bill Whitmer Manager of Rates P.O. Box 208 -
p Wichita, Kansas 57201
- Ree By letter dated liovember 22, 1974, yousubmdtedforfilingan initial Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service dated Ilovember 7,1974, between your company and the City of Erie, Kansas. . ,
Centle.en . T he above rate filing submitted by your company has been accepted for filing, to become ef fective December 26, 1974, (so days af ter filias date), and has been des 6saated as follo se i See Attachment for Designations and Descriptions i Any rate schedule filing to effect a change pursuant to adjast-ment of charges for any new sales or gross receipt taxes should be 7 acccenpanied by appropriate data and computations showing the basis , for. the change in rate. Notice of the filing was issued on December 5, 1974, .ith co..ents, protests, or petitions to 6ntervene due on or before December 23, 1974 . No ce== eats, protests or interventions have been filed. I This acceptance f or filing does not constitut e approval of any service, rate, charge, classification, [ or any rule, regulation, contract, or practice af fecting such rate or service provided for in the above. t
, - designated rate schedule (s); nor shall such acceptance be deemed as recognition of any claimed contract-ual right or obligation affecting or relating tu such service or rate; and such acceptance is without t prejudice tonow proceeding any pending findings or or hereafter orders which have been or may hereaf ter be made by the Commission in any instituted by or against your company.' \ This acceptance for tiling terminates Docket No. E - 9128. /$
8 pg
. ybn & as ja y ~ , t ~ 1, , .
M.["" \ p Z/M
\
Ker. net h F. Plumb I cc:CithofErie seentarr { Attenhj'on: Mr. LeRoy Friess Mayor Erie, K has 66733
\
l i
._J f
FPCForm332Rev(373) _ m ar-r m - ,n-wr-
- I d'
NITACllMhTIT Kancan Gan and 1;1.ectric Comptny Q' . h.$.!! Filed : flovember 213, l'J/h Effective :. December 26, 1 7/4 (30 days after l'.tling) h' Other Party: City of Erie, Kansa:. Designation Dated Dencriptions Rate Schedulo FFC No. 133 11-7-751 Acrecment for wholesale ,-,- Electric Service ; r;.g c.; Wlf\ fff
- -?>
Gupplement tio.1 to Undated Rate T-173 Rate Schedule FIC 11o.133 Gupplement flo. 2 to 9-1 h5 Ocrvice Regulations Rate Ochedule Fit flo.133
- /?'-
E
% q'.Q. :.' '
t ..*/ O.~ 'N n
- W.
il
'Q p.':
O -
'hT),h *.'Ya**~WfE s' 'YY
- l b.'!*
o*'* m' *
- S y. l . ' "5 ?* *.
- e ^~.^**':
~ Jl. ; t ' ;?'* 'li $. 'e* ?.p'$ . . v .~ .
- t';.*"~.m.*
.;; .:. ~.
s i
.,qq-! x^'.vy, s'J,y-v ' =:-&e
l-
. ai, hQ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '
(I) FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION
???
Kansas Gas and Electric ) Docket No. E-9128 Company ) puteg g g . . . . . N0TICE OF FILING OF SERVICE AGREEMENT
%, f y,';Y Wo.io* I (December 5, 1974)
Take notice that on November 25, 1974, Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG6E) tendered for filing an initial service agreement between KG&E and the City of Erie, Kansas. Initial' service pursuant to the agreement commenced on November 11, 1974. KG&E states that copies of the agreement have been ,
,[ ,. , '
served upon the City of Eric and the State Corporation Com-mission of Kansas . Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said ap-fag plication should file a petition to intervene or protes t with the Federal Power Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N. E. , Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 1.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure r' (18 CFR 1.8, 1.10). All such petitions or protests should. - be filed on or before December 23, 1974. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any perscn wishing to become , a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of this ' application are on file with the Commission and are available ! for public inspection. 1bry B. Kidd Acting Secretary , DC-13
~
("%
M-B.2-31op
- m. nrr uv. s.47 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
=
TO' Wilson Cadman gf 9%gv# D AT E' suanct' March 3,1972 City of Augusta M ' O N'ib
~-
On Tuesday, March 2, when,I was visiting with John Mercer, city manager of Augusta, h'e requested that I provide him with approximate cost estimate for a 10,000 KVA inter-connection. lie would like our recommendation whether the 69/12 KV transformer should bc located near our 69 KY line in the northeast area of Augusta, or if this line should be extended approximately 1500 ft. south and located the transformer at their generating station switch yard. lie would like this information by April 1, so that he can discuss this subject with the city council of Augusta, o ps n BAMagnus:bg1 a
,,' 4- B.2-32 To$astr7:ev.s.7 INTEROFFICE CO R RESPON D ENC E foi Mr. Wilson Cadman EATE. March 9, 1972 S U 4 J E C T' City of Augusta O ,
- 1) It is immate. ial to us whether the sub is located near our line or located 1,500 feet south at the plant switchyard.
In either case, our only requirement would be that a dis-connecting device be provided within one pole span of the point of interconnection (plus, of course, a low,,,sfde trans-former breaker and associated relaying) . If they some day envision a loop feed with two transformers, then it might be better if built near our line. If only a single trans-former tap is envisioned, then it would probably be easier and simpler to locate this transformer in their existing switchyard , b 2) In the matter of costs, the following estimates are based on our cost figures for similar work. 1/3 of 3-way GOAB, installed on pole at point of interconnection S 2,600 1,500 feet of 69 Kv line with guyed, vood pole terminals. (Does not include right-of-way costs.) $10,000 7.5//10.5 MVA substation with single metal clad breaker as shown on attached one-line. $93,000 Jilliansberry/ey Attach, cc - Messrs. E. S. flall B. Fuddick R. Longstaff
t
+e ._...t_..-...__. . . . - . . . . . . .
i e I i i 6 9 KV i A t
. r, ro st/c />s/ //s c/s.1or 5.* b - S., ;
t . :
- i y
3 . 5 i i a i i
. l W /SOO' .. I 6. ..* , l '. t e . n ', .i i .
I D! l _ ca ,.+ o., t _ _ ._ l I h 4 l 6 Q ~ /2 5 KV gy 7.Sl~ 9*37S M VA G CC*C _
/Y Y Sa'fl/0*TA/.9N 2 GS* C Bursed NrlJY')! /h y /2.06 A7tnp ) .$~a o A W /)
st/e'f.8/ C/oc./ $ Weld 4#~ O** lCAf^4* l @ b 3 ac of.s-I i @ w., t
; _.,f 2-40ll '
i 57 ' I Cory o,c stu cu.r rn ,
]"t '7'/"4 'Ce A/#/'c'7'/dAl l vWH 3 72
'.**.. B.2-33 March 14, 1972 , \ . '. . ..<q, . q.4 c .. .i. g . , * / p. .
- t. . ; .
., (, .
- , . sy , ... . . . . . . . . . . . ...e f. ,, r ..Jm s '
,.;,1 .
- 3. .; . p ., y . .,, , , ,
I
!!r John Mercer, City Manager . 0~ ~;,. . City of Augusta , , -6 ,. , , s. ,, , , . ,, c. . , . , .: . Augusta, Kansas,y 67010,, ' .., , .,, ^ .." ' .... .a ~
u.1.y ;- yy . , r; , :,' . :n ' - ,. ,
- r. - ,.-:.
- 2,. ,.g.. ,c }' . . .
- n. ...
Dear,
John: , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , . ,, . y , , ,, ppg . d Bedford Magnus, our manager at El Dorado, advises me that you have requested some information pertaining to a 10,000 kva interconnection between the City of Augusta and KG&E. Our engineering department has pro-vided the following information based on ballpark estimates and no specific details of your system. Their ideas and. estimates should, of course,, be verified by your consulting engineers. Q. Should the sub location be near the Kc&E 69 kv line in the northeast area of Augusta or should it be extended some 1500' south in proximity to the present Augusta switchyard? A. It is inmterini to us whether the nub is located near our line or located 1500' south at the plant switchyard. In either case, our
;' only requirement would be that a disconnecting device be provided within ' .one pole span of the point of interconnection (plus, of course, a low side C transformer breaker and associated relaying) . If you some day envision a R '..W fP' loop feed with two transformers, then it might be better if built near our ; /t 'Q line. If only a single transformer tap is snvisioned, then it would prob- 3 5 "'M f- +1 ' ' ably be easier 'and simpler to locate this !.trans.former in.your. existing ' { .' i, e. ,[* .,}' '. ) ' ', $,switchyardj .}, ' , f.[y'. ,[~hr;t[, - . O f, * . ., t h,. .:w , .-,,. > ~
g ', Q. What would be the probable installation cost to the. city ' - of the line and associated substation?
' A. In the matter of costs the following estimates are based on our cost figuros for similar work.
1/3 of 3-way GOAB, installed on pole at point S 2,600 7,id o of interconnection i 150M of 69 kv line uith guyed wood pole $10,000 l@,J *
/
terminals. .. (Does not include right-of-way costs) ,
, 7.5//10.5 mva substation with single metalIclad ' breaker as shown on attached one-line. , $93,000 [O/j (60 l ,
l .
- i. o ' ' . */
6 .;. ,1. , . J. . * , - - g . 4
John, 'if you or members of the council have additional questicus, either contact Bedford or me. Should there be interest in ' discussing the feasibility of an interconnection, I would suggest that we arrange a meeting d here in Wichita where we have maps, reference material and our operating
.. personnel readily available.
We will be looking forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, U f :=
,.. , y, ',c ,
Q *. ,c '. ~* *
'.*n s *g 9 7 .c y e e .
- g
t8 .,e , r.* 4 * / 6. t '7
. '88 . .g e', f ,..A*. e s ,- , . . s. .
WKC/vr f Attach cc - tir Bedford thgnus
- 1 s .
g ,,.g., bc . Messrs,G W Evans ,. . ,. Ralph Fiebach *
- s. , .F M Kimball r ,
i 7 1 E S Hall Bernard Ruddick
.' + John llansberry . . R E Phillips, Ralph Foster h.' t g a ,
4 +. s
. * 'f' e 9 e
- .. . $ 2. s *. -> a
- .y n.....
, -"/ -; * , .. 1 -
B.2-34
,o,m s er7 en v. i. 6, INTEROFFICE CO R RESPON D ENC E To, Mr Wilson Cadman DATE.
March 29, 1973 su sJ act. City of Augusta
,(;!f ..
This is in reply to your recent request that we update the estimates of f acility costs which the City of Augusta might incur in making an interconnection. The revised cost esti-mates are as follows: 1/3 of 3-way GOAB installed on pole at $ 3,500 a. point of interconnection 1500 feet of 69 Kv line with guyed wood $ 10,000 b. terminal poles. (Right-of-way is not included.) 7.5//10.5 Mva substation with single metal $101,500 c. [*S clad breaker per attached one-line diagram. Does not include land, fence or grading. If the City desires automatic line sectionalizing or supervisory-controlled line sectionalizing at the inter-connection point, it can be added at a rather modest additional cost. We will also provide an estimate of this cost if the City is interested. I i l J/. _ l JHH/JL/cy Attach cc - Messrs E S Hall B Ruddick j R Longstaff
. R Phillips
l i
,- . ._. . _ _ _ _ - - .__a _ . . _ . _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ _ . - . . . . . .
I 1
& 7 kV ; - k. -
3 s, 1 7.h . 7b
/fo 1.s/ h /4s </ts n S*1 , .S.s j .
I
. i t
I i
~
l
- i, % /500' e
'iti i
l 8 e f I l l ,
._ _- .- - - -. -- - Sub.z/s hov Y. .-_ - -.-
l i
?
I o l 6 9 - /2.r xx wa 7.rl93nuencsce i y y ivy r.y, iso.s swa e we i auried re,6*ay [+5 12 cs n m,a 0 .-iso A w w
'g) afetatet,</ osNsw .L 4 4 e S ); 3- soo/s-i @ _-_u, i
l i M 2-WI
- 57. b Cs7y os stu cu.rin
, l l i fa yrg cs x.tv < 7ud s n i JNt/ 3- 9-72
- B.2-35 March 30, 1973 4
O - - Mr John Mercer, City Manager City of Augusta Augusta, Kansas 67010 ,
Dear John:
I have enclosed copies of the new Electric Service Sched-ules as approved recently by the Federal Power Conmission. This includes Schedule A, Firm Power Service; Schedule B, Emergency Power; and Schedule C, Economy Power Service. Bedford Magnus will phone you the updated construction costs which you requested when he has them, sometime Monday morning. O Sincerely, pY WKC/vr Attach cc - Mr BedGrd Magnus bc - Messrs G W Evans Bernard Ruddick Ralph Fiebach John Hansberry F M Kimball R E Phillips E S Hall Ralph Foster
,, ,, , - - e , , _ --- , - ,,- - . , .-- ,
;s ..y , 4 . . ', s1 ' B.2-36 June 4, 1973 .
- n. , , . . ,<
~. .
n ..s
" .~
- ~y.: 7
. ' , . . s. ... '
j'; s3,';: y( ", '.J '.,.t y* 3 ". ,...
. .t ic 'y:',{ , ' ..j":.* .M ..,re,;,."
e ,.
.<'e.y' . .,. h.. ,. y,.'J; f ; a. - 13 . .y,,a e
r, j; ,.fg ,. . s. p .* p
- _,. s v; ;....py q.,.:themgs.sss , : e ". ~. M r~~ew v s r e ..re n .m e:4 . .. . : . .s '. sp . e 4
4
..... .. . . . .a , ...o, , . . , . ... .. , w. , s . : q.s,f; .eE hu. MrCity John.. Mercer, .yg.7j,\~..,,,3,. p* g ,, g.,,f,,, , , ,' ,
t 2 z g ty y ,4gep,p
.,<i r l 4.,..h .
of Augus .i; . ;,:t < <
,,.,s, **ai '4- .y+ . a ev ' .r. Augus ta,s. Kansas p:s 67910 NJ A 'n. M, . = 1. . t ~' - .
Dear John:
I have attached a copy of our Transmission Sche'dule which you requested during our sneeting a week ago.
..y
- s. . . .* .i .
- v. . ,, 1 ... + .,, ,;. ,. , , ,
. .. ,Should you have additional l feel free to '. ; " coll'either .Bedford or me'.i questions!
- T . !' .
p ease.' -
- 4. - -
n . t.:* e .x . : 3 ; ' .. .c"w -? :s
- Sincerely, O , .,, a .. , . . . . s , . . o. . ,,s x, .uy.;; s .
- . : y , :' . .;, i. w.s.; a ..), : > . a. 'n .q...
s . . . ..h V.
.u T. e .+- ,.- .
vi.
- , ...uy.;c.
.o , .. . : o s. ,. . . ,3 6 .'. . :s i' * ;l}} . .' ?).,i.ff v*y d+.N.h.d.! 9 .~ . f ,,, f 9 O % st <::. ~4~: i - *;. e - - ... .e:.l a .c a ::i. y W .t. se . <:pp . . 1 ..,.,. .
WE t p g 14 % v
- u. a . .. :..c w . . . ..U.
.D pb: e ,o i 'Q' ? .L.a ,q@**, y.;q,:,W.': b,p.c;et .wg @V.H(;a 3'., p vt,)M'sy' J lo.* ,' f 4 L .,
i Q .y! . .N.;t
.o . , p; 'a IrIe 4 .g; 4' L' ' .:* 1. c.
c . i . ; '.
'a I: "
L.;.;Wl:,l. ';,
..r .
1 t it h . ,ys,;- c . t.* * ., ').-. m, ', ,7i^ ';... .p~.6, ,.N.%e,j ',F, . p ,d .* e fd, !.u.; , *,T.t., wl x .o
- A .4 . .s h, .i; , . S h .'t ** ,
. ,. . . . s,% 4 j,i, k .[ U 4 '3.
g '
< v " WKC/vr .- .a ...' . . .
Att.ach' - e.: cc.- Mr B A Magnus i
' , ? '.g . *q. ....u.u. .,. . .s , 'r. . ._, ..s ,, . , . ,, . . i - s .- s.s. v. . . . . . .- +
cW - , s ,i 9;
- fi f.; 4 'j. ! 'ge::. . .. y *. - . 5 . M '. 4, . . . .. ?
;. s \ p; .t. . , ,. '.; .g. ' -*;. ,.t . . . . .; . t ' d ,:, la . . . .;. . < " , . .. r t. -
i f,. Ac .d. .. , ; # St. ..p., m;u . ,,~. :rw.. t- e , ' . '
. . . .. .. ' a. . * .) :,9,';; ,.,4. .
t . .
. o- , -, ..;,., - .r t. si
- i. . . :i: .- I . 4 y$ ,y p.h;r .p & . sasst g,3 <*. c # ,9. *y n, ,s.L,1 ,.c i. *..'. n.( .
- ;9 ~< s . '* *
- e. . .t ,1 '.. : .' . .w.
a . : - i 1
.?O; w. '.' . . .'::; . M : . . . ' OC . ; U.; %. I ;{L.. . . \. , :%, ' .4 4y ' -, .<<
c . e
' v.Y'. ,. *.= . ,. \. ; s # u r,. .;.
- i. ..,* j ,;4., .g
.' .n......' .
.0 t . .ss ela e, *.
B.2-37 April 29, 1974
. .. v . . ~ . . . . c. . "A>: . ,. . l, ."n. ,ksk. .... .< ;;. .'.).
fidQ. A .}l". : . : l ' .;g *.> , .$;$.v .. . 5,6. l.y.y .4 . N
. . .i. ,.' \ ; ; .1 f ;'.ud .
6 .5. .. e. a,.c,. .. . t.h.N , ,L.M t e., m.- . @.s s' .Msh lWNQ.c < . . e 6 s'. o. , n .' i . , l l
.s l hs. n. .s . > .. . . ., s .4 t..e su. :2. .4' r n .s.i .,, .. ,- . . v.s. . . , -; . ., , ,< .,_,a .
- k ,,. ' Y ".[Hr' John Mercer,' City: Manage i. ,
k, ,i..'. 9' ' ' '
- D: ^'t +.,'
.w 4. City. of, /Lugusta,.u. , . 4~ sp~,%yd; 5 .'a-j cg,, . n,, ; .a , . . Q.,,-
- e .e.(. y 67010
. Augusta. .' Kansas
Dear John:
1 have attached a copy of our , interconnection agreement including
. service' achedules A, B and C.t The transmission schedule 9 such as ' ., ;. .,
the one between Coffeyville and.Chanute is not included, but available* to the city should you< desire it at some future date.e '*.-
. Please have all. 3 sets executed on,' behalf oft. he city and' return
to my attention. Our president will execute on behalf of the company. O As discussed with you and Morris Moon, all dates have been lef t y h,p ' * .,,.,, blank and will be' filled;in appr,opria%y, a,s, mutual 14 agreed upon
; ..y.b,oth b . , , . . parties. , ~ a,,.. . t . .. . . . .,
6 '- '- N
- It'is!important/,
- John,P' that ouri engineering. and operating people . -).- %
J J; i
- meet with your consulting engineers'for coordination.2. Please.let'.
/.,.,) N i' 6 ' * ',,: knowWhom'you'have; selected.Nhen convenient. ' O.'O{,V. . .M. . :.p..
E.f. e .>. '.' ,
, ~ s. . . ... , We certainly look forward toca long 'and. mutually profitable *- t. ... .' re l.a'tionsh.ip' betwe.en .. -
y'ourg eity and Kan,sas ,.Gas.,*and Electric Company. f Sincerely, 4 . ,
. ,~.
w
.'. , - . o *. ,. .
en . a
.. .s . . *a . .: . . , .i ?- ..
d
' . ,1. 3 N. : .pg 7 y+ l .Q 9 '; ".;. <<y n.. :(, c d.6 4,;?)3- 4."p. .n 4.W. v + . / ', /:3 e c. . . , ;.; ..g . . g A. .. .. - l. .y ., . * > c%g. s ll,,a. , , y,2 * * ., d;P, f , . , $ / .:.
u ,
.- y, . ,t ,.y ... w.. . . , , , , . . . . . .
WKC/vr Attach bc - Messrs G W Evans John Hansberry Ralph Fiebach R E Phillips B A Magnus 8 . t . *c. ,
,s.
e v..
} ,j,a .c,*,j'c , E S Hall <s.
Dennis Evans ' #g** ..
. j, .jf' *.;.,$.' .' Ralph Foster s
4
- Bernard Ruddick .
- Bill Whitmer
l B.2-38
. . . ;~
- 6/5/74 ~
' Mr Mercer Y s. '^ .
Per your telephone request this morning,.here are . 2 copies each of the Electric Interconnection Agree ' - ' ment, and Schedules A, B and C, and 4 copies each.of , the sample Schedule D. , W e O (Mrs) Verna Ridgeway Secretary to Mr Cadman b
- s 9 e 5, Y e Ji I l t
e i e
+ 8, e %*
t.
- . . , , . , , - - .m - - , _ . _ - - . . _ . - __ _ . - . . ._,.....,m.. . _. . , , . , _ . _ - _ . - - _ . . _ . , - . ,, , . . , _ , . , , - - .. _ ,- . , ,
JOHN MERCER C'""^"^*" B.2-39 s, 4 Tity af hugusta y=ON K. NEh .,
. . , WILS .,,
AUGUSTA, KANSAS Y,, , CADMAN ,,',? June 27, 1974 Mr. Wilson Cadman, Vice President , Q Kansas Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 208 .. M U Wichita, Kansas 67201 N I D Dear Wilson- C E p Enclosed are three signed copies of the agreement, Service p Schedule A, Service Schedule B and Service Schedule C for approval A by your company. T The agreement was authorized by the city council on May 6, 1974 w M which should be inserted as the date of agreement. A E T N Thank you for your assistance in this matter. E T R Y urs truly, . O U O Y# U ohn Mercer E B ity Manager l I E C l JM/rb E S l A C l F T E R T I Y C 7 O S I A N P g l T A A l N T l N i N I o l N I G l AIRPORT
- URB AN RENEWAL PUBLIC HOUSING
- SEW AGE TREATMENT s
n.2-40 July 19, 1974 d:n Mr John Mercer, City Manager City of Augusta . Augusta, Kansas 67010
Dear John:
I have attached one copy of the Electric Fnterconnection Agree-ment between the City of Augusta and Kansas Css and Electric Company fully executed by our president. We are still working on the Short Term Firm Schedule. I didn't want that to delay tranumitting a copy of the Agreement. We will send the schedule as soon as it is ready. We are pleased that these negotiations are finalized and will be (? glad when your tap is complete. Our company looks forward to many years of mutual benefit arising from this arrangement. Sincerely. WKC/vr. Attach bc - Messrs G W Evans * "E' " Ralph Fiebach
*E""'
E S Hall Bill Whitmer R E Phillips Ralph Foster John Hansberry . B R Ruddick
B.2-41 {, KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC C:MPANY v e somerme esm.-w W- 8. W A L 4, [ ft July 26, 1974 bc: Messrs. G. Don Elliott (2) W. Evans / Ralph Fiebach D. Evans E. S. Hall Jack Skelton R,E. Tate /J. Klassen/M. Shank Mr. Fred B. Adam, Director MilsonCadman OA Utilities Division Bernard Ruddick State Corporat' ion Commission Harley Macklin/N. F. Pinkstaff 4th Floor, tate Office Building Important Document File Topeka, K sas 66612 Electric Interconnection Agreement with the City of Augusta, Kansas, dated July 2, 1974 including Service Schedules A, B and C INITIAL FILING
Dear Mr. Adam:
In accordance with the Commission's Docket No. 39524U, we enclose three copics of the captioned documents which are effcctive October 1, 1974. f Monthly rates for payment of service under Service Schedules A, B and C are the same as those in comparable service schedules with other municipalities having electric generating plants such as Chanute, Coffeyville, Mulvane and Neodesha. Please return one copy of the documents showing the Commission's filing data. Very tru ours,
),A Bill Whitmer, Manager Rates and Data Processing q346 C IR n,,
WBW:BW: eld W,<I? & 2 ' - Encl. h E 2tuzo f-: ,~ t c
% U us5 .4 %8>
g CUfgg.d' 208 N. Market - Mchuta; Kansas ~ Mail Address: P.O. Box 208 / Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 2641111
eso. uun uiitus, s., G. W. Evans / Ralph Ficbach/D. Evans B.2-42 E. S. Hall KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- -~ J ck Skelton . E. Tate /J. Klassen/M. Shank .-
W1.lson Cadman Bernard Ruddick
.a -.Harley Macklin/N. F. Pinkstaf f .u "aa R. E. Phillips July 26,1974 Important Document File Mr. Kenneth . Plumb, Secretary Federal Po er Commission g((g Washingt , D. C. 20426 Electric Inter'c"onnection Agreement dated July 2, 1974 and Service Schedules A, B, and C with the City of Augusta, Kansas INITIAL FILING
Dear Mr. Plumb:
In accordance with the Commission's Regulations, we submit the following pursuant to: Part 35, Sec.15.12 Filing of Initial Rate Schedules, Par. (a) . (1) Enclosed is a copy of this letter, two copies of the Agreement dated July 2, 1974, Service Schedules A, B and C, Title Page and a check for $100 to cover the filing fee. (2) October 1,1974 is the effective date of the Agreement. (3) Copics of the Agreement and Service Schedules have been furnished to: (i) Mr. John Mercer, City Manager City of Augusta Augusta, Kansas 67010 (ii) Mr. Fred B. Adam, Director Utilities Division State Corporation Commission 4th Floor, State Office Building Topeka, Kansas 66612 (4) Service Schedule A - Firm Power Service covers the quantities, conditions and the period of time that clectric power and energy will be made available l I by the Seller. I 201 N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Mail Address: P. O. Dos 208 / Wichuta, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 264-l!!!
l l
Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary Page Two j July 26, 1974 Monthly Rate: $1.725 per kw per month of billing demand, plus 4.5 mills per kwh for energy delivered hereunder; or cost of procurement, plus 0.6 mill per kwh if necessary for Seller to purchase firm power from other sources.
Fuel Adjustment: Adjustment factor of 0.0109c per kwh for each Ic or fraction thereof deviation from base cost of fuel of 24C and by the ratio of gener-ated to generated plus purchased kwh's. Service Schedule B - Emergency Service covers electric power and energy supplied by one party to the other under emergency conditions. Monthly Rate: 9.2 mills per kwh; or cost of procurement plus 0.6 mill per kwh Fuel Adjustment: Same as Service Schedule A Service Schedule C - Economy Energy covers electric energy from units which at the time have f surplus capacity not required by Seller, or can be delivered by Seller at a cost which is lower than the cost Buyer would incur by producing or procurement of such energy. e Monthly Rate: 5.0 mills per kwh; or cost of procurement, plus 0.6 mill per kwh. Fuel Adjustment: Same as Service Schedule A. (5) Both parties have executed the Agreement and Service Schedules. Par. (b): (1) Due to the contingencies involved in all of these Service Schedules, we are unabic to furnish a state-ment comparing sales and services and revenues therefrom by months for the twelve months succeeding the date of initial service.
Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary Page Three July 26, 1974 (2) and (3) Monthly rates for service under Schedules A, B and C are the same as those in comparable service schedules with other municipalities which have elec-tric generating plants, for example: Neodesha - FPC No. 131, Chanute - FPC 128, Burlington - FPC No. 126 Mulvane - FPC No. 132. (4) Attached in duplicate is a system map showing the O interconnection with the City of Augusta. Please advise us when the rate schedule number is assigned to this Agreement and Service Schedules. Very trul you s, T hJ Bill Wh tm r,
)~
1[ager Rates and Data Processing WBW:BW: eld Encl. b 6
M' B.2 # [ts[r o \a,t Jfs,
- ~
H::sh:-.--a g-. g .n RCs'tti S. 000tNG DAtt f, sATF(ts lutis v. .ory Cove,nor Cho;,m.. Y) *-
- c. r,~..., 48 C vrason A. sinostao c. int.""
01l"10!'QfIUll oAnoto o. Main OllipH$4.l$0s s a ts r. w ats su,. ." ,
- c. c..mi TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612 7 .
Utilities August 7s Division 1974 In the matter initially filing an Electric Iof Kansas Gas and Electric Com Agreement with the City of Anterconnecti pany dated A, B and JulyC. 2, 1974, includinugusta, Kansas,on r g Service Schedules 74U158 Ha tes and Data ProcessingMr. Bill Whitmcr Kansas P.O. Box 208 Gas and Elcetric Compan y
'I- - Wichita, Kansas 67201
'I
Dear Mr. Whitmer:
f tion Agreement with the a copyCitEnclosed, or herewi th, is 74U158 on August 7, y of1974vice Au6usta,Schedules Kansas including A, B a er-ved by the Commission under if Yours very truly, i Fred B. Adam NWS:tm Director of Utilities i Enc.
- s t
L I i S
~~.l. . B.2-44 FEDERAL POWER FOMMISSION WAsmNGTON. D C. 20426
[ IN REPLY REFER TO: V] WR-RC Docket No. E-8938 - -:. Kansas Gas and Electric Company Attention: Mr. Bill Whitmer Manager - Rates P. O. Box 208 k O. - ( ,; g. Wichita, Kansas 67201 0 Gentlemen:
.N By letter dated July 26, 1974, you submitted far filing an Electric 'M, '
Interconnection Agreement with the City of Augusta, Kansac. Your submittal has been accepted for filing to become effective as of the date of initiation of service and designated as chown in the Attachment. Please advise the Commission of the date of initiation of service. Notice of the filing was iscued on August 6,1974, with comments, protests, or petitions to intervene due on or before August 13, 1974. [A - No comments, protests, or interventions have been filed. p.'.r . Any rate schedule filing to effect a change purcuant to adjustment of charges for any new sales or crocs receipts taxcc should be accompanied g by appropriate data and computations showing the basis for the change (j in rate.
'Ihis acceptance for filing does not constitute approval of any service, rate, charge, classification, or any rule, regulation, contract, e or practice affecting cuch rate schedule and rate schedule cupplements C#
as desi 6nated in the Attachment; nor shall such acceptonce be deemed a 4 recognition of any claimed contractual right or obligation affecting or relating to such service or rate; and such acceptance is without prejudice to any findings or orders which have been or may hereafter be made by the Commission in any proceeding now pending or hereafter instituted by or y against your company.
'D11s acceptance for filing terminates Docket No. E-8938.
Very truly yours, 7 Secretar' f ; ytiQlY: Aace.$ gbh J/ N& &h A 'As
/ cc: City of Augusta Attention: Mr. John Mercer G.
F' City Manager () Augusta, Kansas 67010 , 59%qMSr?.M "?.:4in , : 9.; *
"2 .::n w s:
-. t.
AMACIEEle"I n, 1;ancan Gac awl 1.1 etric Company
/ %./'i ru.
Cated : July P,1(T/h '{c[ K Filed : July 29, l'.r7h Effective : Date of initiation of cervice Other Party: City of Augusta, Kannan Decignations Descriptions Rate Schedule FPC No. 134 Electric Interconnection A6reement , yev W.. '.. Supplement No. 1 to Service Schedule A - Firm Power 76,5 Rate Schedule FPC Ilo.134 Supplement No. 2 to Rate Schedule FPC No. 134 Service Schedule B - Emer6ency Service Supplement No. 3 to Service Schedule C - Economy Energy Rate Schedule FPC Ho.134 C t-t.-'-- a s._- f.: , t. L e
- c' W.
,- x em+
M* *$ , Jd @_ W_m4-4-.s ., . . . . v .e . . - ~ ,, . '*a-
, *. s.s : s ' ' s:.*~~.*~*,',*h6 .- , ,- .~:.-'* , ~ * ~ r .y . * * *. * ~ . -
%' . ' .* e e v,f '. a
*NN*i " -$ .#E d'. ** *~ * * ' ' ' ' * + **#= . '- b* . '. $' ' ' 'I .-5 -
B.2-45
' t' *~
(I O X '0 OXFORD, KANSAS 67119 March 9, 1977 O - l i Kansas Gas & Electric Company 304 South Summit Arkansas City, Kansas 67005 ' ATTENTION:
Dear Sir:
The City Council of Oxford would like to visit with K.G.&E. 's representatives about the possibility of K.G.&E. supplying Oxford O witi. electricity. l If you could notify the council as to the time and earliest l possible date that you could meet with them, they will make arrangements to be available. Sincerely, Q) y[p w & -
~~ -- ~
Richard, Rodman & L oyd W. Green Councilman Mayor e **
, . _ , _ - , _ _ . . ~ . . - _ _ , - . _ - _ _ , _ ,
I. .
't f L ( s 11 <']- n.2-as 5 f.5'] KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY .m m -- ".'"..",,*,',",..;" May 13, 1977 ' ,
() Mr. N. R. Nelson, Mayor City of Oxford Oxford, Kansas 67119
Dear Mayor Nelson:
I am sorry for the delay since we last talked about the possi-bility of installing some device on Oxford's service whereby we could establish accurate demand loads on your system. In checking with our engineering and operating departments, there re apparently 2 ways that this could be achieved:
/ We could loan the City of Oxford the necessary equip-ment such as meter, current transformer and potential ,f' transformers to meter the demand. The City would install this equipment.
("5
~
- 2. The Company, with your permission, would install the primary meter set as necessary to record demands.
Costs incurred in so doing would be paid to the Company by the City of Oxford. There would be no equipment charge, only necessary labor and mileage . . These monies would be refunded to the City on their first electric bill should Oxford decide to inter-connect with KG&E. Either of these a'lternatives would provide the information necessary to accurately determine costs of power. If there are any questions that might need clarification, please don't hesitate tu contact me. Our Division Line Supervisor, J.E. McNicol and I would be happy to meet with you. Sincerely, t Kenneth D. Lunt Division Manager KDL/jc cc: J.E. McNicol 304 S. Summit - Arkansas Coty, Kansas - Mail Address: P. O. Box 532 i Arkansas City, Kansas 67005 - Telephone: Area Code (316) .142-3200
e
- B.2-47 Ciqo;j0xja3 -
OXFORD, KANSAS 67119 May 24, 1977 Mr. Kenneth D. ~1unt Division Manager Kansas Gas & Electric Company P. O. Box 532 Arkansas City, Kansas 67005
Dear Mr. Lunt:
Thank you for your letter of May 13th concerning the equipment necessary to determine our demand load. It appears to me that we should h try to use the plan you mentioned as Item #1 whereby you loan the meter to the city and that we install the same. I hope that you will be able te have one of your men contact .Mr. Bud l Spence and perhaps there are some suggestions or infonnation your man l might want to offer with respect to this city hooking up the meter. Yours truly, N. R. Nelson Mayor NRN:jh 4 e,, . .- + , - , . , ,m . -. , .- ,m-,,.,,--
*s. .)"""
B.2'-48 jgy'
.g KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- r. o. nom 203 m luta. s. n n u .m TNT ELF C FreeC CD4488Aarv
/
Mr Konneth Lunt/ 0310N f~ . l, is . E:' I lI July 2G,1977 f;g,g $ i ;'!f 2'd
,fS :
N k p r. 54
! [ hld 3. 7 - ....iaui'l','G;ius'i % ity of Oxford, Kansas . . :%:c :e .'
3"? R % T' .
) a miini [i [ ! d ] Af ter a careful review of all the a,ltornatives, we have determined that the best approach to making a connection and supplying powcr to the City of Oxford would he to build a 138/12.5 Kv substation two miles west of the city limits and under our ElPaso-Creswell 138 KV line. Our i j proposal would include the following:
1
- 1) In and out svitching on our 138 KV line.
m
- 2) A 5,000 Kva transformer bank consisting of three single phase e units with one spare unit.
i
- 3) A voltage regulator V 4) A vacunn recloser with electronic control and a fuood hy-p passing arrangement.
- 5) Two miles of 12.5 KV line.
- 6) Fole mountad billing metering equipment e.t the end of our
" 12.5 Kv line.
We would propose to run our 12.5 KV line talonti liighway 160s and would deliver power to the city at approximately liighway 160 and the city i limitc. The city would be responsible for any lino work beyond this l point. We w uld probably build the 12.5 Kv line on public right-of-way. '
,[
Cost of a subutt %n site is included in our proposal, ,, Jour catimated cost, based on today's dollars, is as follows: p' l fp e i-a.I Total Installed Cost of Substation, Lino and Metering $ 334,836 l]Is ,) ...,., ,, , g
) , , ". .# 'In and Out Cont for the same . ,
153,204 [l ' ' $( ' '
-' p* , . p ui j & 'p* . ,,g *i) (I e r p- i n , < ,' I , ',0.'
pt). w,,n
/ Delivery on' the new transforTners required for this would be quite long -- something like 22 to 30 weeks. Based on that, it would probably take us 9-12 months to mako this connection if we started ordering equipment immodjately.
A /Q g// y/ 4 14,
<Af*< + . . e . ._ 1. *39, TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1 1.0 MEM DM - '_,m 3m p=g=-
l,l ,5
*bb 1.8 1.25 1.4 l.6 l
- 6" +
llll4 <S/A !@f'b/ kk 4,,,
- Rjih.f4
1
& /N/ ' $9 '*
kk k'%'O =
**Ih 't $//y+/xkk _ E E- ,- %,g's;f TEST TARGET (MT-3) 1.0 's HA DM y ly lillE j.I [,'"HM R
I.25 11.4 1.6 le__
< 6- , # %,, / <\ *$7>ep*/ S' o p, '4tk<t i . ,. - - cj j
+.- Mr Kenneth Lunt , July 28, 1971 l a'le '
We bellove that this is a good proposal and that the arrangement des-cribed will provide the city with a very reliable source of power. It should be capable of handling the city's needs adequately for many years to come. d Lot me know what additional information you nay need from ne. t i { JOHN H. IIANSBERRY l JHilancberry/cy 1 cc - ricssrs G L Koe,sJ,or D 1.vanrV D Ruddick R E Phillips a J McNicol V !liddlebusher J Lucas R Walker i L Cunter 4
' d' 'r ,
B.2-49
' ' #~N KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPA'fY FM NAfCf88*CC N Y " " ' August 5, 1977' =<".."....o.
031CN ., i ~ i i b S,u uu r i ~ l f g
>O ~ $ :y d <'* r j. , . .- V '; ij ;>
( M$$ $ S i ;' hQ >,'r N 5 <3 #? E hli II om <a A-Mayor N. R. Nelson i, City f Oxford hu ma :l))))M )))]-; g[ir ] mO!gh:-
]h' ~#
I Kansas 67119 0xfor ((}
Dear Mayor Nelson:
As discussed with you Thursday morning, Mr. Dennis Evans, Vice President of Customer and Community Services, has instructed his staff to prepare agreements for' wholesale electric service by and , between Kansas Gas and Electric Company and the City of Oxford. As we discussed at the City Council meeting on August 2, Item 2 of these agreements deals with establishing " minimum" and " maximum" kilowatt requirements . . . It is possible through a mathematical approach to determine demand loads for the past 12 months based on your kwh consumption, but we would like to be certain, and I would feel more confident in dealing with actuals rather than estimates. In that the City of Winfield has a " demand meter" as well as a kilowatt hour register at your metering point, I would assume over the years they have maintained a record of electrical load on that particular line. As you know, during the past several months, some of your staff have read this demand register and furnished us with " actual" de-mands for June and July. It would be most -- dvantageous to secure
" actual" KW consumption for the past year in order to compute factual costs.
As discussed, I will be in Chicago next week, and by the time I get back, we hopefully will be in a position to submit agreements
. to you and the City Council for examination. . Since receiving your letter dated March 9 inviting us to meet with the City Council relative to investigating the possibility of sup-plying Oxford's electric needs, we These have calculated costs were costs based figured on the on ap-figures you have provided us.
plicable rate schedule at this time, Pi!M- 17 3 . At the Council meeting the other morning, you will recall that 1 stated that we expect a rate increase affecting this particular rate. Application has not been filed as yet so I cannot attest to what the percentage increase will be . . . I am confident that there will be other rate increases in the future affecting all of the Company's rate schedules. In comparison, I'm confident there
~
will also be rate increases affecting generating municipals such as Winfield, and one would assume that these costs would be passed on to their customers as well. 304 s. Summat - Arkansas city. Kansas - Mast AJdress: P. o. Ekn $32 l Arkansas Cott, Kansas 6700$ - Telephone. Area Coce (316) 442-3 m
.; (- 't.
t Mayor N.R. Nelson 8/5/77 Page 2 - Due to several economic factors, the era of cheap electric power is gone. What's important is the availibility and reliability of electricity at the most reasonable price possible. I mention this once again as I would like to c'ontinue to keep everything straight between us. I am not trying to s' ell you on KG&E service . . . only submit to you facts from which you and the Oxford Council can make an intelligent decision. As you well know, every rate increase we file comes under the juris-diction of the Kansas Corporation Commission, and customers affected - by the increase are so advised in advance. ' I will contact you just as soon as I arrive back in Arkansas City. Sincerely,
.9Mtihb ALA @)
Kenneth Lunt [*\ KDL/jc cc: Mr. Dennis Evans t
, - .. r. , w ,-- , . - - - , ,- , ., ,~ww,--,-w-- -,,.,n-. cv.,, , , - , - - - , - ~- a
I '4- B.2-50 Posa nF7 elv t 47 /',') ' ' llly f i-INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE O m "J i I i ; - ~ _- 'Ii,
,'l4 e I N l
- . ; , D; !
l
' s !
ij TO' Mr Dennis Evans g g , '.' ~ J,,,4 ! i; u a
. t ) .i *l,!i .
1 lf1 i DAMS August 19, 1977 [l.ml;Ij. $ 7. i,
', D ,i - l,! l < '.
mci' City of Oxford Electric. Servic ' ff ff J n U You requested a recommendation regarding the possible whole-sale delivery of electric power to the city of Oxford. The following conditions and data were considered in developing my recommendations:
- 1. Oxford approached us regarding a wholesale delivery point.
- 2. Oxford provided us with consumption data and a maximum demand. For the 12 months ending July 1977, their con-sumption was 7,102,000 kwh and the maximum demand was 2,600 kw. Based on these conditions and applying rate schedule PWM-575, the annual revenue was estimated to be $151,062. This estimate includes $41,367 of fuel adjustment but excludes R&D.
,q 3. To serve the load, it would be necessary to build a O 5,000 kva, 138/12.5 kv substation and approximately 2 miles of 12.5 kv line. According to Engineering, this will cost $334,836. The "up and down" was esti-mated to be $153,204. *
- 4. The city of Winfield serves Oxford under a contract that expires June 26, 1978. '
- 5. Winfield. purchases a portion of their power from us, consequently, we are providing some of Oxford's load through Winfield.
The new revenue projection without considering the possible loss of sales to Winfield is adequate to support the additional new I investment. This situation will improve when we are granted an increase in the wholesale rate. l The substation required to serve Oxford will also improve the reliability and continuity of service in a portion of the area now served by Udall and Rainbow subs. It will also provide needed capacity for growth. Consequently, a portion of the investment could be allo-cated to system improvement. In my opinion, 10% to 20% of the invest-ment could be absorbed in this manner. My recommendations are:
- 1. Submit contracts similar to those attached.
l
4. Ltr Mr Dennis Evans 8/19/77
- 2. Request a letter of intent from the city of Oxford, should they decide to take service from us, in which they agree to pay for all material and labor involved in providing service to them in case they change their mind before service is connected. This would allow us to purchase equipment and start work without risk while the contract is being negotiated and executed.
l /"'s 3. Oxford should be informed of the upcoming wholesale (_) rate case including the projected increased amount. This represents my views at this time. In a few years when Winfield might be purchasing more of their peuer requirements from us, it will be more difficult to justify add!.tional investment to serve Oxford.
/
1 WKWoolery/nb Attach [ v . e i
I b. . h. hN ,7 [ B . 2 -fl_,__
- 8. h (LU 0 -
XOth a"O!/s J htCUVIDi" C g, y J l
-. SLP i l'21 - - = . . . = = = - = - = . - - - - - ./& OXFORD, KANSAS 67119 .
_ _ Aatinsuan
. A 4A.2 Mt[,*',5 , ~ . ___itter r . .- _ rvwsst . _
_ J if BA'N . . . 50sita September 6, 1977 _-_ewtur must= rvr systta J Acat e _. J 3%fA'ut
'Wilrs - %.st An - > mans wts __
we _r Aft . _sh t t e
. n s .'.. ~~~
Mr. Kenneth Lunt Kansas Gas & Electric 304 South Sumit _ Arkansas City, Kansas 67005
Dear Mr. Lunt:
By action of the City Cvuncil this morning our contract agreement between the City and KG&E was approved and passed by unanimous vote subject to the minor modification with respect to the term of the contract which apparently your company has approved. Imediately upon receipt of the modification of the contract with respect to the term period, the council will conduct a special meeting to approve and sign tne agreement, adopt the ordinance, and have the ordinance published in our local newspaper. We, therefore, request that you accept our letter as our intent and consent to complete the contract and request that the proper personnel of your company proceed with the acquisition of line and equipment necessary to place as- service in operation in the most expedient manner possible. Yours truly,
, JQQLEV^
N. R. Nelson Mayo r - NRN:jn i
,a Qyy N*L s B.2-52 KANSAS GAS AND ELEC7RIC COAfPANY P. Q. Bas 208 Wechsta. Karsas 6720) tw nacm.c cwaw September 8, 1977 lionorable Mayor N R Nelson and Merbers of the City Council of the City of Oxford 1 Oxford, Kansas 67119 lionorable Mayor Nelson and City Council:
J on Septemher 6, 1977, we met to discuss a proposed electric service contract for the City of Oxford. A suggested
" ordinance and our plans to file, with the Federal Power Com-mission, for an increase in our wnolesale rates were also discussed. This letter will confirm our understanding of the enanges you requested in the proposed contract and ordinance.
v We agreed to change the term (paragraph 8) of the con-tract from one ten-year renewal to automatic annual renewals.
' Paragraph 8 now contains an initial term of ten years with automatic one year renewals con.mencing on June 27, 1988 and each expiration date thereafter.
_s We agreed to change the proposed ordinance as you sug-gested in Section 2 at the top of page 5. When your sugges-tions were incorporated, grammatical changes were necessary. All the changes made occur in the first four lines of Section 2 and I believe you will find them to be satisfactory. When comparing the proposed rate schedule PWM-1077 with the present PWM-875, you will find the charges increased, one less step in the demand charges, one less step in the energy charges and a 75% ratchet added in the demand section. The proposed fuel rider (FAPWM) when compared to the existing
- fuel adjustment clause rider differs in that the fuel base was changed from 3.45 mills to 10.06 mills, reflecting more closely our fuel costs, and the loss factor in Section 2 of I
the rider was changed from 3.86% to 4.65%. Copies of the ! proposed rate schedule and fuel rider are enclosed for your ! information. The request, when approved by the Federal Power Commission, will increase your power costs between 32% and 40%. hy l,.. j REH.H,dh ' B ;?.4 Mi m! H U[! P M ism Wl&(55l } is M I A
,; !'[l1 q' qi dly$
i l 'l j
~' ,Ni Ii
{~ Gab E r
. _ _ _ 'fl i' t de . l , <
f ,,f E C
i Ltr City of Oxford 9/8/77 Enclosed are tuo conics of the Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service to the city of Oxford and three copies of an Ordinance uhich was prepared for your use. Please destroy all conics of the aforementioned which vere left with you on Sep-
! tomber 6, 1977, as they are now obsolete.
I Please sign all copies of the Ordinance in the spaces 1 (l~] indicated by checkmarks. One copy of the Ordinance should be forwarded to your official newspaper. the 0: ford Register, for publication. Incortant: The ordinance should be published before the two copies of the Agreenent are sigt.ed. Af ter the Ordinance has been published by the neusnaper, please return to my attention one copy of the Ordinance, 3 copies of the newspaper nublication and 3 copies of an affidavit of publication which the neuspaper will prepare on their own form. Also return to my attention (after Ordinance has been published) signed and dated copies of the Agreement for Uhole-sale Electric Service. Areas that should be filled out are indicated by checknarks. Upon receint of the aforenentioned, I uill forward the i nr.reenents to our corporate office for acceptance by a Conpany i dI official. When accepted, ote copy will be returned'to the City of Oxford for your file. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. We are sincerely apnreciative of your cooperation and that of the City of Oxford. We are looking foruard to a long, and nutually beneficial association, and ve are proud to serve the electrical needs of Oxford, Kansas. Sincerely, s Kenneth n Lunt Division fanager K9L/j c Enc. bec: Dennis Evans /Verna Ridgeway / William Mason / g,-p,vw /7
s.2-53 um r" tu. . ~ g KANSAS GAS AND ELECTCIC COMPANY ^i , 'r
""="c- April 18, 1978 l APR 19 1978 o I , I.! .u ;..,,__-
if/ i Eu :I
- l. I ..
Mr. Kenneth F Plumb, Secretary lN .~. I . Federal Ene y Regulatory Comission [ j,!,* 825 N. Ca tol Street, N.E. rM*u y-Washing n, D.C. 20426 -i.;r."" C
. s ._ __
Agreement for Wholesale Electric .. Service dated September 15, 1977 with the City of Oxford, Kansas. .17
?[TJ 1 ~
Ir.itial Filing
,-' .a _ ; -
Dear Mr. Plumb:
In accordance with the Commission's Regulations, we submit the following pursuant to: Part 35, Sec. 35.12, Filing of Initial Rate Schedules, Para. (a): (1) Enclosed are five copies of this letter, six copies of the Agreement dated September 15, 1977, including the PWM rate p schedule, service regulations, title page Form of Notice and a check for $100 to cover the filing fee. (2) Initial service will be rendered June 27, 1978. (3) Copies of the Agreement have been furnished to the City of Oxford, Kansas. (4) Both parties have executed this Agreement. (., The type of service is electric service to public utilities for resale to ultimate consumers. Para. (b): (1) Attached is a statement showing estimated billing data by months for the twelve months succeeding the initial service date. * (2) (i) Charges for electric service are based on the Company's standard PWM, Public Utility Resale, rate schedule. (ii) Not applicable. (3) The Company currently serves customers on this rate schedale under FPC Rate Schedule No's 32, Sr.,114,115,116,117,118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 124 and 125. 201 N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Mail Address: P. O. Box 208 / Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 264 IIII
o . Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb April 18, 1978 Page Two , (4) A system map is attached showing the point of delivery. Please advise us when the rate schedule number is assigned to this new agreement. Very tr 7 yo r ,
.M ,
i Bil Whitmer Marager of Rates BW:ck Enclosures O O I
~, ~
TITLE PAGE Description of Filing: Agreement for Ynolesale Electric Service dated September 15, 1977 with the City of Oxford, Kansas. Initial Filing.
- > Filed By: Kansas Gas and Electric Cocpany Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Service To: City of Oxford, Kansas Oxford, Kansas 66733 Description cf Service: Electric power and energy in the fom of three-phase, four-wire, grounded wye, alternating current at approximately 60 cycles and approxi=ately 12,500 volts at point of delivery, b
'11TED STATES OF AMERICA l FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY, COMMISSION I Kansas Gas and Electric Company ) Docket No.
NOTICF 0F FILING 0F SERVICE AGREEMENT Take notice that Kansas Gas and Electric Company, on C.-~ April 17, 1978 tendered for filing an initial Agreement for Wholesale , Electric Service with the City of Oxford, Kansas. Initial service is to commence June 27, 1978. KG&E states that copies of the Agreement have been served upon the City of Oxford, Kansas. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said application should file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E.; Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Para.1.8 and 1.10 of the Commission's rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8, 1.10). All such petitions or protests should be filed on or before . Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a petition (**4 to intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. l i i t
-..m.
_) . KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY i Electric Service to the City of Oxford, Kansas Estimated Billing under the Agreement for the twelve months succeeding the date of initial service Month Demand Kw Consumption kwh Gross Billing full Adjustment Total Billing July 1978 2,019 631,000 $. 9,843 $ 4,796 $ 14,639 August - 3,078 962,000 14,036 6,946 20,982 September 3,042 920,000 13,553 6,477 20.030 October 1,904 497,000 8,098 3,499 11,597 November 1,881 474,000 7,789 3,261 11.050 December 1,916 499,000 8,123 3.992 12,115 January 1979 1,816 473,000 7,796 4,489 12.285 February 2,088 491,000 7,958 5,818 13,776 March 1,578 411,000 7 ,01 7 3,868 10,885 April 1,786 450,000 7,488 4,469 11,957 May 1,800 466,000 7,705 5,401 13.106 June 2,600 618,000 9,546 5,698 15.244 Total 6,892,000 $108,952 $58.714 S167,666 o 9 0
t
- w w -
'
- _l e \ i c,. asc , %
e' "* ' . , , a: n
* = . > + .g ;... .= = = =~ w c- , . .j .ucm. : I \ .
n- .o : 5"
' u% ""d
- 4 m e. o e us y o\ . . * = . .. . N _ NEWTON I =aa.a* l j
\ ,1 ~* ! .o i ~
b ~ ~ ~ l . _
~ .o c
I m ootADO
- .y -_ L , **" "p\.u a ll *
- _ . _ ., s' .
. *,.* % + === "
J I can-. m ! . 45* % .o 4
'( ,,,,,.r* g la - p[9._
l i .w ,. 4 icytyge, - a .
% a
- - - a '
% -1. i a -- ,1,,
E ^$ - 1 h 4, , _ U \,. . l _ i 1 s ..'..... .h.s -
\ ==o,. " " * / _ ~* c-.-. de I'
ge-c_a < SautG
%w 4 b, *..'.
3 , b y
% O! %% %
j
, woog.- -*** s I
( . ,; __ )[w[o- -
. l P.
i, j j g INDEPEr OENCI h - -, 3 ! @[l.: ARKANSAS CITY f_ i a si 1 __- %*_1~ . %.a f 4
*- __ % Dj
__o ne A n o n, Ai 4 y e ,,,,,,,, , _ ,g * : e , tEGENO . A 1 4' 1 r
- a. o . _su ..,.c, 4 me---
i e
- o j ' =c=..=. ..
7 W OXFORD .cw ,
** "8 cmc coa *w" :', :::: .'
a . ~ c,.c = ",. m . =co. =-w . . .
- h. we w -. uc=.c-c
}
T % y .' to e Svstem Map at _ _ g ; g ;. co -.. - _ - . . 4
&. ( *** ***";" ~,
] i
~~ S ha - KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY - - . ~ - " .. . ' . ' "
o, , 8A45A3 ***[*
,, *[ ,, 'gg l 0FF#Cfg . W#CM7FA ts t ' e af4fAA8 .o:::"l.";;=:a r: ~;:rg.mmx j b, -4 ...... ....
j 1 ruunctutui or wrcno ra_
. . c.
anea ,,,,,a a
= + = .
A 4 . c m. ..m e d t. , , 1 1
r B . :'- N oP { KANSAS GAS AND EUCTRtC COWANY
. , n e c ....c c-~.
- g. lay 3, 1978 Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary federal Energy Regulatory Coamission 825 N. Capitol Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20426 Agreement for Wholesale Clectric Service dated September 15, 1977 with the City of Oxford, Kansas Initial Filing
Dear Mr. Plumb:
In our April 18, 1978 filing with the Conmission relative to the captioned Agreement with the City of Oxford, Kansas, enclosed is supplemental information. (1) PW!1-178 Public Utility Resale should be PWM-575. Six copies are attached to substitute for the schedule filed initially. b (2) Fuel Adjustment Clause Rider - FACR was omitted from the initial filing. Six copies are enclosed to be included with the other data supplied. If you have any questions on this supplemental information, please call. Very tr y y urs, a Bill lhitmer Manager of Rates BW:ck Enclosures . DISTRIBUTION _ Our File TLF General Files 208 N Market - %#h ta. Wansas - Maal A$fress: P. o Dat 2C8 i Wictsta. K3M1% 67201 - TCicChnne Arca Codt (.1165 lkt iil 9
B.2-55 I I Copy to Messrs W K Cadman h' OI GLKoester/REPhilliM{UO I W G Mason '.7au 'i'csii ' Kenneth Lunt- - 1-- i' 9FQg c , Bernard Ruddick OXFORD. KAf4SAS 67119 JUH } ]g;3 -' Earl Unruh ~ W X Woolery Bill Whitmer
' ' m RCJ.--
r Jack Skelteri/ Fred Knodle 2Ml.Q --- May 31,1978 Ralph Foster 200,'".[. _ ., i r
--[-
Orig. to W B Walker /Important Document File --e T~'
~~lE$.:*
s, ()' -- ~~nsen? V 4 s t VE i b' Z,*,U'l',[d _ in. : a i ---- j
."'u v -.
__rn& f
~~~ ~ ~ ' " " ~. v. Alt >,.d~~~--
Mr. Dennis Evans, Vice Pruident ve.co .if . .; Kansas Gas & Electric Company -- - P. O. Box 208
~ -.-_~~~
Wichita, Kansas 67201 9"- T Re: City of Oxfot Kansas Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service dated September 15, 1977
Dear Mr. Evans:
Please be advised that we request you to change and you are i hereby unilaterally authorized to change the date June 27, 1978, as it appears in Paragraph 8 of the referenced agreement to June 8, 1978, by interlineation, which same change va are effecting this date. Your commencement of electric service on said date will signify your assent and implementation of this change which is done at the request of and as the lawful and duly authorized act ~and deed of the City 'of Oxford, Kansas. You may, if you so desire and advise during the primary term, foreshorten the said term by a corresponding period of nineteen (19) days, otherwise to remain unchanged. CITY OF OXFORD, KANSAS !l
?
Dy: $0' Mayor bLEK i ATTEST: 0 Mh/ $ 0 Y
/CptyClerk
u s;.c u t o a i w it g ., B.2-56 4' ' 4 , e ach/Cadman FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION f }. t/ *3 '
- Hansen/ Tate .WAGHINGTON, D.C. 20426 p. P,;.s. .. -
Koester I W.H W #' ,, D Evans 4 , Walker /Skelton 3NO2t utY. [' R Pnillips Docket No. 78-326 , Kansas Gas & Electric Company Attention: Mr. Bill Whitmer MAR 201973 Manager of Rates cusi. t. cona. O L. - P. O. Box 208 3 SP)'M g Wichita, Kansas 67201 ( f.!AR 5'U9 3
Dear Mr. Whitmer:
_mtr n s.u e.y . . . By letters dated April 18, 1978, and May 3, 1978, in Dock ets.j t . ; No. ER78-326, you submitted for filing an Agreement for J d w t Wholesale Electric Service with the City of Oxford, KansaCld.O which is now served under your agreement with the City of -Q.ju , Winfield, Kansas. Your submittal has been accepted for Z ra _ filing, to become effective June 27, 1978 (the proposed . -ff,7,(',., _ effective date) , and has been designated as follows: tr ax . Kansas Gas and Electric Company ~ ne:m
$$4 - -
Rate Schedule-FERC No. 135 ZSSg _ ___ (Agreement dated September 15, 1977) ill.t,, , - .-_ O Exhibit "A" to Rate Schedule FERC No. 135 Z- TZ, (Service Regulations) __ ~i{gAgf
,.__J a i Supplement No. 1 to y Rate Schedule FERC No. 135 .(Schedule PWM-575)
Supplement No. 1 to Supplement No. 1 to Rate Schedule FERC No. 135 (Fuel adjustment clause) Notice of the filinn, was issued on May 1, 1978, with comments, protests, or petitions to intervene due on or before Jun? 9, 1978. No responses have been received.
, u .
-2 Kansas Gas & Electric Company -
Since the instant rate filing contains rates which are currently under inves igation in Docket No. ER77-578, the instant rates shall be subject to the outcome of the proceedings in that docket and this acceptance is without prejudice to any orders or findings in that docket. ({} This acceptance for filing does not constitute a rproval of any service, rate, charge, classification, or any rule, regulation, contract, or practice affecting such rate or service provided for in the above-designated rate schedule; nor shall_such acceptance be deemed as recognition of any claimed contractual right or obligation affecting or relating to such service or rate; and such acceptance is without prejudice to any findings or orders which have been or may hereafter b2 made by the Commission in any proceeding now pending or hereafter instituted by or against your company. This acceptance for filing terminates Docket No. ER78-326. Sincerely, ,
~i '.},i;d% f A~A q William W. Lindsay, Director Office of Electric Power Regulation cc: City of Oxford Oxford, Kansas 67119 4
9
, . . . - - - - - - - -. . . - , . , - ,, , --e
B.2-57 KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY f
" * * = " * - ' March 29, 1979 Mr. Fred B. Adam, Director State Corporation Commission Utilities Division 4th Floor, State Office Building Topeka, KS 66612 Agreement for Wholesale Electric Service dated September 15, 1977 with the City of Oxford, Kansas.
Initial Filing
Dear Mr. Adam:
In accordance with the Commission's Docket No. 39,524-U, we enclose three copies of the captioned Agreement. Each Agreement
- r. . includes a copy of the PWM rate schedule and service regulations.
45 . , l ?i Also enclosed is an Order from the Federal Energy Regulatory
~1 Commission granting approval of the Agreement.
m 7 ' An executed copy of the Agrec::: ant has been furnished to the of Oxford, Kansas. ju
- Please return one original copy of the Agreement showing the n ', Commission's filing data.
n h, L; .
=
E .#.a Very t 1 .yo rs,
,;'t /
Ylq., fBill l
-gA,$% t. h .er -
Manager of Rates i'
.[
ggg . i-esures!
; ih;c t' !I ', l
- y. ,' ,
kT,. - 3,. y . - l l ? d,
- l. %
l
' M ~ Met Adderss: P.O. Box 208 / Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 264-1111 ru
~
B.2-58 of Eansas , nG:S I# 4: is 4 . g la$e onsnsi3Jion
- h* Orfsora$ ion Fourth Floor, State Office Bldg.
Ph. 913 '296 3355 TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612 Utilities Division April 4,1979
/,
Bill Whitmer, Mgr. of Rates Kansas Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201
Dear Mr. Whitmer:
Enclosed is your filing approved by this Commission under Commission ' File No. 79U86 on April 3,1979. r
, ry trply,.yo rs, !(QY-: ~'
oj v k NWS:rjl Enc. t l k e I" l
e
', 3, , E r . ! ' '( B.3-1 ..- [1 c .1, , e s
( n . [ ts 4 e.;
-o-700 Minnesota Ave.
B I,,,'OARD r , .i, J OF PUBLlCis.lf.y'})J U UTILITIES Kansas City. Kansas 66101
'D SE?l1978 s, . ' ' '
- August 30, 1978 l'.
4.
- e. .
_.*.a _ _ .
. wn e s . . . ' lA .. { ? -- C '. %-- - - ~ ~ ~ ~
Mr. A. J. Doyle , President -
- o. Fe. G. T. Van Bebber, Chairman Kaasas Corporation Commission Kansas City Power & Light Co.
_ _ _ _ 4th Floor P. O. Box 679 State Office Building Kansas City, Missouri 64141
- ,,, ,J1 .}- - - Teo - - - ka, Kansas 66612 f e' . .!r. R., P. Fiebach, President Mr. W. E. Wall, President Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Kansas Power & Light Co.
P. O. Box 208 818 Kansas Avenue Wichita, Kansas 67201 Topeka, Kansas 66601 Gentlemen: In recent conths a group of the cities in eastern Kansas have informally organized the Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency primarily ta enplore advantages of joint action with respect to developnent of future power supply facilitics. As a single Agency representing some Q_8 rauniciral electric systems. with common power supply problems, we plan to worr. together and with the other power suppliets in the area to solve nur f uture power supply problems, hopef ully to the benefit of all concerned. We have recently co=missioned R. W. Beck and Associates, Denver Office, to ccnduct a powe: supply feasibility study for the Agency and the Coasulting Engineer is presently obtaining basic data for the study from the member cities. l The nurpose of this studv is to investigate reasonable power supgly a p ative M or. fur 4 L1 ng hi sunnienental pcver suppjy requirements of the
. i rney rac bers particularly rur the period 1981 through 1990. We plan to
(
- scuss and analyze the possibility of Agency participation in generation f.rojects planned by other entities in the arcs. We will investigate the p.'ssibilit s of construction of generatica piojects by the Agency or certain at its members. Esticated costs of purenased sepplemcntal power will be c) pared with esti..ated costs of power irca the other alternatives discossed acove and, base' en the results of the studies, a long-range power supply prograv. will oc developed for the Atency.
l l
r
'. August 30, 1978 The purpose of.this letter is to acquaint you generally with our proposed program and to ask for your cooperation and assistance during the study period. From time to time, we will need to obtain planning information and cost data from you and we would certainly appreciate your cooperation. We have high hopes that, through a comprehensive study of the power supply Mternatives, we will be able to develop, with the assistance of all of you, joint action programs which in consideration of municipal financing advantages and cost advantages available to all of us through unified effort, will result in mutual benefits to all the eastern Kansas power suppliers.
We earnestly solicit your cooperation with respect to our study program and we will appreciate hearing f rom you regarding the matters discussed herein. Very truly yours, EASTERN KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY By 4M Gilbert E. Hanson, Chairman Copy: Agency Member Cities R. W. Beck & Associates, Denver, Colorado t l
r
/ . ' B.3-2 . ' )'
l ,' .
*'y .. ['f/ d lI ' ' : TLCUVY F% g .' l'tc 1:3.~, m ' /
- THE EASTERN KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY
[' : . /.:. 1211 North 8th Street
,,fJ.4 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 . . .
Phone: (913) 281-8163 J '. . .,: ~- "- - Gilbert Hanson, Chai rman -o - . ~ . _~ T ,. :.., ,;E "-- December 8, 1978 Note: When Foster returns from ; ,'. }' Washington we will discuss. - - e. . ...
.m RFtebach _~_ b. "7,.1.
Mr. R. P. Fiebach, President z,',. .; f Kansas Gas & Electric Company _ , . .in P.O. Box 208 --. " ' 'g -- Wichita, Kansas 67201 ..: __ r.n.x,
~ Vu ?.Lt.1
Dear Mr. Fiebach:
l - In nty letter of August 30, 1978 I advised you of the formation of a group .' of cities into the Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency. As was men-tioned, R. W. Beck and Associates, Consulting Engineers, has been retained to make a study of viable power supply alternatives. In the course of this study, areas of investigation will include possible ownership participation by the Agency in future generating projects of other utilities and trans-mission service for delivery of Agency power to member municipals. In order to realistically assess all viable alternatives, it is necessary that we . request certain basic information from arsa utilities such as Kansas Power
& Light, Kansas City Power & Light and Kansas Gas & Electric. Accordingly, we would appreciate answers to the following questions. ,
- 1. Does KG&E have future generating projects or generating projects now under construction in which it would consider allowing the Agency to participate on an ownership basis?
- 2. If so, what is the proposed schedule for coninercial operation of the generating units involved?
- 3. What are the estimated installed capital' costs, fuel costs, O&M -
and other related power generation costs for these generating I unitsi
- 4. Would KG&E provide transmission service within its service area for delivery of Agency power to its municipal members (or to another utility for delivery to Agency members) from the above generation projects, from other participation generation,.or from generating plants owned solely by the Agency? What would be the cost to the Agency for such transmission service? Please provide a copy of your current transmission service rate schedule.
- 5. Does KG&E have wholesale rates for possible sale of finn power, peaking power, supplemental power, econonly energy and emergency (Continued) l l w' w .- ' e e'. -
( e R. P. Fiebach Page 2 power and energy to the Agency for resale to its members? Please furnish copies of current applicable rate schedules. In order *.o expedite our studies already in progress, we would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to receive and discuss your answers to the above questions. The Agency would be willing to consider the sizing of its - entitlement, in a participation project, so as to make available sufficient amounts of surplus capacity and energy under the 25% IRS rule. I will call you the week of December 18th to schedule a meeting as soon as-possible thereafter. In the meantime, please contact me if you have any
- questions concerning the above.
Very truly yours, EASTERN KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY i ! ff (i.',f {!. ffQ :.) ja Gilbert Hanson, Chairman GH:me cc: Mr. 6. T. VanBebber, Chairman Kansas Corporation Commission R. W. Beck & Associates Denver, Colorado J. A. Wilson, Iola John Elder, Winfield . Ron Reed, Chanute
\
r B.3-3 1.~; 1 i' ,'l THE EASTERN KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY 1211 North 8th Street Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Phone: (913) 281-8163 ' Gilbert Hanson, Chai rman . 4 - i January 29, 1979 * {l i .m n- - Hr. R. P. Fiebach, President e Kansas Gas & Electric Company y , P.O. Box 208 , Wichita, Kansas 67201 . - Re: Meeting Representatives of Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency; _ ~ ~f and Kansas Gas & Electric Company January 25, 1979 - - - - - - -- _tr u . .. ..
Dear Mr. Fiebach:
I want to thank you, Messrs. Evans, Cadman, and Lucas, for taking the time to discuss power supply problems with representatives from the Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency. During the course of the meeting a couple things were discussed which require some more exploring before we can proceed with our study. First, your company feels that a purchase resale arrangement for the transmission of power is preferable to wheeling. This would mean agency power would be sold to an investor owned utility and eventually resold to an agency member. As was mentioned, our problem with this would be the tax exempt status of our bonds, and with copy of this letter I am requesting our legal counsel, Donald A. Bell, to research this area for an opinion. Secondly, it was your company's feeling you could use more time to review areas that the agency would help KGE. An example was a low voltage condition on the western portion of your system and pcssibly the agency could install intermediate loaded generation. In light of this, it was felt your written response to the questions in my letter of December 8,1978, would be~ delayed - until February 16. All in all our committee was pleased with our exploratory meeting and feels we can be of mutual benefit. Again, thanks, and if you need additional information please call me. Very truly yours , EASTERN KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY k
^
1, ) Gilbert E. Hanson, Chairman GEH :j s , cc: Donald F. Bell, Wit..ita J. A. Wilson, Iola John Elder, Winfield Ron Reed, Chanute
( . B.3-4 February 16, 1979 Mr Gilbert E Hanson, Chairman Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency 1211 North Eighth Street Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Dear Mr Hansen In your letter to Mr Fiebach January 29, 1979, you indicated that we would supply written responses to your letter by February 16. That date is correct and the date we agreed upon. Several pressing matters have made it absolutely impossible for us to adhere to that timetable. This week has been particularly crucial. We do have a Board of Directors r.ieeting next Tuesday and will make every effort to respond after that date just as soon as possible. Your patience is appreciated. Sincerely, WKC/jh cc - Mr Ralph P Fiebach bc - Messrs DEvans Lucas
r B 3~5 j' i 9 T?'.',
,o.. iii, ,,< i.., b['.J'' , ,~. 'h y d,h% /p ~
- n. MARIG1979 ~
INTEROFFICE CO R R ES PON D E N C E -" 7,m .
~ '-- - no r.. ,
_ LADfM4 . _ _ lilli'll _. _ f v MC. C ' . . . . _ l VA!4% 1 .._ _ To, Messrs. WCadman - RFiebach '$$' 1 2- __ cm Acc us _ oATE March 16, 1979 _C:0,iS V _ HANS[H
~
sessect' Eastern Kansas Municipal Agency $$ tina IAALKUN ILNIAGUE 2 PHILili'$
' _r;l1KST AG _._ . .
_ HtVLS ._ ..- __,_ RtttncK _ _ I received a call from Mr. Gil Hansen, BPU. I had previously _
'[ ['g __;
mentioned to him that KG&E's transmission system near some of wtiav ._ _ . the municipals may not be adequate to carry the entire municipal r_ _~ load. This would be the case for. Winfield, Wellington, Iola, _- and perhaps others. Ostensibly,Gil called to say that he would ask their consultant to send us information about the municipals' projected loads. He said he had not yet received a letter from KG$$ about their request for information. I told him that you were in New York now and that a letter.would probably be sent soon. F.3 was congenial and did not seem to be upset. I got the impression from Gil's conversation that his mind is - made up that the Agency will be formed and that they will " define _ a project" in which the municipals can participate. He inferred that he did not want to do so but if they could not " define a project" within the State, the Agency might go outside the State. He also mentioned that BPU's Nearman No. 2 now scheduled for the late 80's might be moved up to 1984 as an Agency projec't. 1 ed JRL:ke Copies to - Messrs. GLKoester REFhillips
.-- r-, ,. , _ - . . . - - - - - . - - . - - - - - - . - . - - - - - . - ,
B.3-5 March 29, 1979 1 Mr Gilbert E Hanson, Chairman Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency : 1211 North Eighth Street l Kansas City, Kansas 66101 l
Dear Mr Hanson:
1 This is in responsa to the list of questions you provided us and to confirm some of the points covered in our conversation with you and various members of the Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency here in our offices January 25, 1979. Question 1) - Does KGkE have future generating projects or generating projects now under construction in which it would consider allowing the Agency to participate on an ownership basis? As we have indleated, KGkE is committed to a construction program which includes Wolf Creek unit #1 for commercial operation in 1983, and 207 ownership in each of the four Jeffrey units. Jeffrey units 3 and 4 have now been slipped one year each (JEC #3 from '82 to '83 and JEC f4 from '84 to '85). These facilities form an integral part of the plan we set in motion in the early 1960's to convert from a gas / oil fuel base to coal / nuclear. Obviously, and I think as we mentioned in our meeting, we are not interested in further reduction of ownership in the units described above. Our present and burdensome construction program based on present foro..:asts should take us to the year 1990 or thereabouts. No plans have bee: . made as yet for additional generation beyond Jeffrey #4. We have done some very preliminary work in reviewing future potential sites. As you know, KGkE and KCPL have each offered KEPCo an 817. joint ownership interest in Wolf Creek unit il for a total KEPCo ownership interest of 171. We are in the final thross of negotiating all of the necesskry documents, financing arrangemente, etc and as a natter of interest met with KEPCo again as recently as Tuesday of this week. The negotiations are time consuming because the subject is complicated for all parties.
Mr Gilbert E Hansca pego 2 March 29, 1979 Naturally, KEPCo's ability to participate will depend upon the finalization of a long term loan from REA or others. They see no problem with that. However, in the event that KEPCo's ownership would fail, we believe the 81% ownership interest offered by KGE to KEPCo could be made available to your Agency. I feel, however, that the entire deal tvill be finalized. Question 2) - If so, what is the proposed schedule for commercial operation of the generating units involved? Answer included in question fl. Question 3) - What are the estimated installed capital costs, fuel costs, OEM and other related power generation costs for these generating units 7 Since it appears unlikely that any of the units described earlier will be available for ownership by the Agency, I have not detailed all of the costs requested. As a matter of interest and to give you soms feel for investment costa, however, Wolf Creek unit #1 is presently estimated at
$947/ kilowatt; Jeffrey #1 $493/ kilowatt; Jeffrey #2 $346/ kilowatt: Jeffrey i3 $408/ kilowatt and Jeffrey #4 $417/ kilowatt. The Jeffrey units were contracted in the very early part of the 1970's. Should the situation develop where the agency could participate in Wolf Creek as a result of a problem developing for KEPCo, we would, of course, expect to get into the matter in greater detail.
Question 4) - Would KGLE provide transmission service within its . service area for delivery of Agency power to its municipal members (or to another ut.111ty for delivery to Agency members) from the above generation projects, from other participation generation, or from generating plants owned solely by the Agency? What would be the cost to the Agency for such transmission service? Please provide a copy of your current transmission service rate schedule. KGkE would consider providing point-to-point bulk transmission service within our service area for the use you have described in question #4. As we do not presently have a service schedule for this type of service (except that schedule available to KGkE interconnected municipal customers) we can not tell you what the cost might be. We would expect euch schedules to be fully compensatory for all energy transferred. The cost would depend, of course, on the terms and conditions of the service and would require FERC filing and approval, based upon a return on fully distributed costs and investment.
Mr Gilbert E Hanson page 3 March 29, 1979 We would reserve the right to regulate transmission of power across our system with a buy / sell approach as a means to maintain control of the transactions and line loadings during normal and emergency conditions. Question 5) - Does KGkE have wholesale rates for possible sale of firm power, peaking power, supplemental power, economy energy and emergency power and energy to the Agency for resale i to its members? Please furnish copies of current applicable rate schedules. KGkE does not presently have service schedules which would be applicable for the type of wholesale services referred to above. However, we are developing such schedules to accommodate the KGkE/KEPCo agreements and can make them available to you after approval by FERC. We would like to make several observations, Mr Hanson. We want you and your Agency members to understand that we recognize the existence of the power agency concept in the state and applaud your efforts to develop power resources for your members. Due to regulatory problems, efforts to limit siting and the construction of transmission lines, unsettled conditions in the state regarding utilities, and the lack of a definitive national energy polley, we find our crystal ball cloudy. W5 have confidence in our forecasts based on a historical track record. We do not know, as I am sura is the case with the Kansas City Board of Public Utilities, what the future holds with respect to projections based upon historical growth. We would advise you that our present intention is to preserve the expandable resources of our two mature sites (La Cygne and Wolf Creek) for our own retail customer uses. We would strongly recommend that the Agency give serious consideration to harness your financial and consulting resources in identifying generation sites to be developed by the Agency. While we cannot commit at this time due to unsettled conditions and other
, factors, we would give serious consideration to acquisition of an undivided ownership which might be made available to us by the Agency in a future plant or to other power purchase arrangements between the Agency and KGkE.
Should you have further questions, please let us know. We will be following with interest the development of your program and the efforts of your consulting engineering firm. We apologise for the delay in getting this data into your hands but know that you understand the reasons and that patience is appreciated. Sincerely, WILSON K. CADMAN l ! WKC/jh b c - M e s s r s Fieba ch /K oe ste r /DEvans /Phillips / Luca s /F oste r / Rive s / GEvan s /Hans en /M ontague / Tate / Walke r ( -- .. . - _ _ - - - . - . . - . . . _ . - . . - . . -_ . _ _, _ _ - _ _ _
Set-up 6/1 xe.va o: R. E. PLI1.p
.,, Y % I** CY
- Mr R E Phillips May 8, 1979 %. If ) s Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency I had a call today from Gil Hanson, Chairmar. of the Eastern Kansas Municipal Energy Agency. He advises me that the Agency is proceeding to explore the possG111ty of ownership in a proposed partnership arrangement with the Kansas City Board of Public Utilities. The Board's present plan is to construct Nearman #2 (340 mw) for commercial service 1986. With Agency participation they are considering increasing the size of the unit to the range of 500 to 600 mw.
Mr Hanson is arking what, if any, participation power or other purchase arrangements might be available to them. The Board will have some capacity the years '80 to '81 for the Agency. KCPL has indicated they can make participation or other arrangements for the years '80,
'82, '83, '84. KPL indicates '83, '84, '85, '86. KCPL, incidentally, has estimated participation power out of Wolf Creek at $153/kw with energy at 8.4 mills escalated at 71 annually.
Mr Hanson has asked us to give him some indication of the amount 6 of power and energy, and price of energy, that might be available to them for the years 1980 through 1985. I did mention our slight deficiency in 1982. I also confirmed that the sale memorandum had been executed with KEPCo and that as stated in my letter to him March 29, 1979, ve are developing schedules to accommodate the KGkE/KEPCo agreements. I would recommend that we accommoda'te Mr Hanson with an answer l as soon as possible and make quantities and costs very approximate, as he will understand that. He also would appreciate us considering our estimates based on Wolf Creek commercial in the time frame 1983. WKC/jh l cc - Messrs Fiebach/Koester/DEvans/Lucas/ Foster / Rives /GEvans/ 1 Hansen/Montague / Tate / Walker
r B.3-8
/ f('[,40RTIIWEST KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY .e' /), / '. .
585 North Franklin Colby, Kansas 67701 913-462-3973
' . /, . . h',/ '/p. .
Colby. Kansas .*/
., ; 7 ,y, ,
Ellis. Kansas j/.,,
- Goodland.'Kaps'as . . ' . ' . ..' ,, f f.
Norton, KansasY-('s / .
's'LtCrosse. Kahdj ' l / /
Orkley, Kansas X, <;'in., , July 3, 1978 Oberlin. Kansas Jt. Francis, Kansas
\/[s( . ,' / ! ' . . .
d aron Springs. Kansas .,,, s Mr. Glenn Kocste'r Vice President, Operations Kansas Gas and Electric Co. P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 6720)
Dear Mr. Koester:
I would like to take this opportunity to officially introduce our Energy Agency in the interest of opening communications between the Agency and Kansas Gas and Electric Co. As I am sure you are aware, the Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency was just recently organized pursuant State Enabling Legislation and as such, the Agency is in an embryonic state although informa12y, the Agency has been organized for one year. The Agency consists of the following Kansas cities: Colby, Ellis, Goodland, Lacrosse, Norton, Oakley, Oberlin, St. Francis, and Sharon Springs. The goal of the Agency is to provide its member cities with an adequate, reliable and economic source of future energy. To this end, j the Agency engaged the services of R. W. Beck and Associates to begin a preliminary study to focus the Agency's attention on the most logical way to accompolish the goals set for the Agency. 1 ) It will be the phi.losophy of this Agency, as long as it does not l impair the Agency's primary obligations to its member cities, to cooperate l with all other utilities throughout the State and Region. So if at any time you require any information from the Agency, have any questions, or would just like to discuss the Agency or the Agency's future plans, please do not hesitate to contact me. With my best regards, I am, Sincerely, Jay Berens, President Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency JB/was l
- '- B.3-9 ' I g3 pl[MiWOg n f u tJ V!D
- ' OC17"1979
- NORTHWEST KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY P.O. Box 1026 'l'f'"'
l,
. n ~" -
Hays, Kansas 67601 __ n e u fj ~~
/
Colby, Kamas / <- :* 'j per/* Ellis, Kansas (4 q -_ Goodland, Kansas Lacrosse, Kansas
" [m < Joint ,.
N:rton, Kansas , - Orkley, Kansas Oberlin. Kansas St. Francis. Kansas jpje,[ ._,_ hiron Springs. Kansas October 18, 1979 , Mr. Wilson Cadman, President i~ ' , _z
-^"
Kansas Gas & Electric Co. P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 -g- ; - --
Dear Mr. Cadman:
Late last year a group of cities in northwestern Kansas organized the Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency. Prior to forming this Agency, an infonnal group commissioned R.W. Beck and Associates to conduct a prelimin-ary power supply study. The information and data in the report, dated March 1978, is now about two years old and there have been a number of changes in the area power supply picture since that time. The Agency is now updating this report and at the same time increasing the scope to review all possible known power supply alternatives open to the Agency. As a single Agency representing some nine municipal electric systems with common power supply problems, we plan to work together within the Agency and with the other power suppliers in the area to solve our future power supply problems, hopefully to the benefit of all concerned. We plan to investigate reasonable power supply alternatives for furnishing supple-mental power supply requirements of the Agency members, particularly for the period 1981 through 1990. We plan to discuss and analyze the possibility of Agency participation in generation projects planned by other entities in the area. We will investigate the possibility of construction of genera-tion projects by the Agency or certain of its members. Estimated costs of purchased supplemental power will be compared with estimated costs of power from the other alternatives discussed above and, based on the results of our studies, a long-range power supply program will be developed for the Agency. In order to realistically assess all viable alternatives, it is necessary that we request certain basic information from area utilities such as Kansas Gas & Electric Co. Accordingly, we would appreciate answers to the following questions.
- 1. Does Kansas Gas & Electric Co. have future generating projects or generating projects now under construction in which it would consider allowing the Agency to participate on an ownership basis?
October 18, 1979 Mr. Wilson Cadman Page 2
- 2. If so, what is the proposed schedule for cognercial operation of the generating units involved?
- 3. What are the estimated installed capital costs, fuel costs, 0&M and n"her relaimLP.apareneration costs for these generating units.
p ent:mwemmitYnf Taagm Arrrc_'-tg
- 4. Would Kansas Gas & Clectric Co. provide transmission service within its service area for delivery of Agency power to its municipal mem-bers (or to another utility for delivery to Agency members) from the above generation projects, from other participation generation, or from generating plants owned solely by the Agency? What would be the cost to the Agency for such transmission service? Please provide a copy of your current transmission service rate schedule.
- 5. Does Kansas 4 & Electric Co. have wholesale rates for possible sale of firm Mwer, peaking power, supplemental power, economy energy and em2rgency power and energy to the Agency for resale to its members? Please furnish copies of current applicable rate sch( dules .
In order to expedite our studies already in progress, we would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to receive and discuss your answers to the above questions. I will call you the week of November 5 to schedule a meeting as soon as possible thereafter. In the maantime, please contact me if you have questions concerning the above. We have high hopes that, through a com-prehensive study of the power supply alternatives, we will be able to develop, with the assistance af all of you, joint action programs which in consideration of municipal financing advantages and cost advantages available to all of us through unified effort, will result in mutual benefits to all the area power suppliers. We earnestly solicit your cooperation with respect to our study program and we will appreciate hearing from you regarding the matters discussed herein. Very truly yours, NORTHWEST KANSAS MUNICIPAL ENERGY AGENCY By, h h 4 k $ A %f/ w tilbertE.Hanson,P.E. General Manager GH/sh cc: Mr. Richard C. "Pete" Loux Kansas Corporation Commission
B.3-10
- d I , *1 e
,oo iin ..a ...g t. .i g ' .". - r. "
i~Teaoerice cosaeseo~oe~ce 4 EffEJ 10. Mr. Cadman D^'t- December 14, 1979 SUBJECTS , I took a call from W3yne Weber yesterday while you were ti sf , .~_ up in a meeting. 7_- __ Gil Hanson had contacted him about our offer to explore thh. _ 'T'= sale of some portion of Jeffrey Energy Center and Wolf Creek. The 'r-LC~'~ -' " i thrust of Hanson's message was that he would be willing to rake._ = . necessary studies, however, he didn't want to be put in the position of taking extensive investigations and then having our partners exercise their option and buy the share of the units NWKMEA was contemplating. I told him I felt the possibility of that was remote, however, I thought we could check with KP&L and KCP&L and get a feel for their reaction. Weber indicated he d appreciate having whatever information we furnished Hanson. ,.
/
( BW: ram cc: Messrs. Foster Hansen Evans, D. . Woolery Phillips/Lucas
B.3-11 Messrs Fiebach/ Foster December 18, 1979 Cil Hanson, General Manager of the Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency, called this af ternoon. He is desirous that we pursue the matter of the agency owning a package piece of Wolf Creek /Jeffrey #2. He does not want to initiate studies in the event partners elect to exercise first right of refusal options. I advised him that we would clear up that point but doubted if any problem existed. He again suggested that he was cartain he could get more western Kansas towns interested depending upon how much capacity we would make available. Since meeting with us they have met with KPL. The KCC asked that a comunission staff member sit in on the discussion as they did in our case. KPL refused. Cil said that KPL offered them participation power and a " piece of the action" when a plant is constructed in Salina. WKC/jh 9 y go S ir J 1s b~ . fj) {iu (,syfiev> dz0 hof 4'""& f yf( % of TEc cym1, 7 tm l
l , s.3-12
" m7 ,..a' l
R. W. BECK AND ASSOCIATES )llht >#.~ (NclNIER$ ANo CONSULTAN15 L' * " ~ Ei hf*)
"O M ofIuri OfMGN 5E Af fl WA%HINGTON RJ.fl5 MOSANNOCK DENVit. COLOR ADO 80204 gg g **CI W NI 303-292 4270 m ~o DD-2247-EG2-MX December 21,1979 Mr. Jim Lucas Assistant Superintendent of System Operations g'd Kansas Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
Dear Mr. Lucas:
We have been instructed to gather data for the Northwest Kan.sas Municipal Energy Agency pursuant to an economic review of possible Agency power supplies. In this respect we understand that Mr. Gil Hanson, Agency General Manager, has discussed with KG&E N possible sale of portions of KG&E owned generating facilities to the Agency. In order to make the proper comparrisons for the Agency we need cost data associated with each generating unit being considered. The following is a list of data needed for this review:
- 1. Which units are being considered?
- 2. For each unit, what are the: .
- a. amounts of participation being offered (minimum to maximum amounts)
- b. costs per kW of pa-ticipation
- c. projected commercial operation date
- d. projected plant factor
- e. projected fuel costs
- f. projected fixed O&M
- g. projected varriable O&M
- h. projected transmission costs associated directly with the project.
- i. other costs associated directly with the project.
- 3. Wheciing arrangements available to the Agency to move this power
- 4. Availability of reserves in connection with these units and what would be the costs of these reserves.
- 2-We will be seeking to determine the cost of this power at the Agency Member delivery points. Any information you can add to the above list will be helpful.
Best regards. Very truly yours, R. W. BECK AND ASSOCIATES T By A nt_ a ebum
, C. Vernon Thorwald ; Principal Engineer CVT/ch cc: Gil Hanson G
t 9 4 I i l wwwe--- w-ww a m w- + - - ee-em 'er'*w
- *=gre -e'w=++-= N-*-- wN*** T'-PP=-Cw-y swe- =*3ae'* vp 'ev--'wM'-'---7 pert-***W'**Wv**-rPe- v ,9'e eT9w g-y -'*w**---+9*W-MF= - i T
-' -'L.. -
Bf3-13
*' h; carsas cas aw rucisYEpisokw.s' I
l
.- ,oc..<c - .-. .
l
~
- .*rch 14, 1980 .
_ n
'# w n - ~4 ., .. o .... _ _
n a ,, . CS".. i % ro _. 3 u a t,-. l 'c .c:a
~[ s .h ^, g T " $r. V. Thorvald '
1(.11. Beck, Inc. __ 650 Bannock -. - Danver,fColorado 80204 . V - , -
Dear Sir:
You recently requested information regarding estimates of availability and costs for Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency cunership in certain construction projects. Attached are responses to each question asked in your data request. Please understand that these are estimates for cost evaluation purposes and should not be considered as firm. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, h). J. R. Lucas Asst Supt of System Operations JRbke Attachment Copies to: Messrs. kTCadma Gil Hanson, NkTMEA bec - RFiebach RFoster , f GLKoester/kTk'oolery HHansen DEvans Whitmer EProthro HMacklin REPhillips Gk' Evans
- . ....n t).
- a s as ~ *.*a l A:: ess P. O B;r 2 *3 ..staa. vansas 6723: - ItC *e. kra Cc:t :::C It * ::::
The following information is provided in response to a data request dated December 21, 1979 from Mr. V. Thorwald, R. W. Beck, Inc., regarding par-
. ticipation by the Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency in the WCGS1
- project. These estimates should not be considered as firm estimates but l may be used for cost evaluation purposes.
! 1. Which units are being considered?
f l Wolf Creek Generating Station Unit No. 1 .I
- 2. For each unit, what are the:
- a. Amount of participation being offered (MW)?
Eleven percent (11.0%) of KG&E's fif ty percent (50%) ownership
; in WCGS1 or approximately 63 PGi, subject to existing contractual obligations.
- b. Costs per kw of participation. $1400-1850/kw Range of estimated costs to the Agency to purchase ownership participation in WCGS1 assuming the pre-sent construction schedule and present budget estimates.
These estimates are based on recovery by KG&E of all actual capital costs'as well as reasonable compensation for management and risks which KG&E has carried during licensing and construction of the project. The lower value assumes Agency ownership beginning January 1981, while the upper value is based on Agency ownership beginning on the date of c(imercial operation.
- c. Projected commercial operatiun date? April 1983
- d. Projected plant capacity factor? 65 - 80%
A unit's capacity factor is dependent on its mechanical operability, regulatory constraints, the owner's load requirements, etc. Based on KG&E's experience and that of the industry we project annual capacity factors in .. the range shown. ti e. Projected fuel cost? , $8.30/mwh - 1984
$11.60/mwh - 1987 On the basis of existing fuel contracts, inflation $13.36/mwh - 1990 factors, projected commercial fuel price, etc., we escalated at 6%
project fuel costs in dollars /mwh as shown. thereafter
- f. Projected fixed 0&M7
$20/kw-year in Now estimated as shown. 1984 escalated at 6.0% per year
- g. Projected variable O&M7 -
All O&M assumed to be included in f., above. (continued)
~
Pcge 2 4 s
- h. Projected transmission costs associated directly
. with~the project. No direct transmission investment by the Agency. An approximate monthly transmission service charge by KG&E ($/kw-mo) $1.45-$1.75 e Approximate energy losses 4 6%
- i. Other costs associated directly with the project? -
Monthly service charges would be cade in order to cover dispatching costs, operating reserves, administrative and general expenses and other similar costs, but such a charge has not yet been
- estimated.
- 3. Wheeling arrangements available to the Agency to move this power?
KG&E has previously agreed.to sell transmission service to KEPCo for which KG&E will deliver to KG&E's interconnections the output from KEPCO's WCGS1 capacity. It is KEPCo's responsibility to make appropriate arrangements with other utilities whr, would then receive and transmit KEPCo's power and energy. KG&E is prepared to make a similar agreement with the Agency, all subject to mutually ag;eeable terms and conditions.
- 4. Availability of rese'.ves in connection with these units and what would be the costs of these reserves?
i To the extent that the Agency and its member municipal systems have additional dependable alternate get., ating capacity, the Agency could provide its own reserves. If the Agency chose to purchase reserves from KG&E and if FG&E were to agree to sell reserve capacity, the reserve capacity charge it presently forecasted to be approximately '$7.75/kw month. The pricing of any energy to be provided to the Agency by KG&E on loss of the Agency's generating capacity would be based on KG6E's cost to produce and/or procure the added amount of energy. . J. R. Lucas Kansas Gas and Electric Cocpany 3-13-80
B.3-14 eo. iir7 . v.i..r INTEROFFICE CO R RESPON DENC E Memo to File
"*"' May 20, 1980 suenct, I discussed the status of the Kansas Municipal Energy Agency with Gil Hanson by phone this morning.
R W 3eck has nearly all of the data on the participating cities' requirements. KPL has agreed to discuss a participation contract with the agency. KCPL is indicating they would make available 150 mw of participation power from Iatan and Wolf Creek through the year 1989. After 1990 they would expect to sell one half of that amount either out of Intan or Wolf Creek. The first official board meeting of the agency, whica now has 33 city members, will be tomorrow in McPherson. The summer peak, stacked, of the 33 cities is 300 mw. The total capacity of the cities' generating units which are all diesel, except some #6 oil-fired turbine cap?7ity,is 400 mw. Mr Hanson hopes to develop a letter of intent by middle of July if the feasibility study is positive and the cities are comfortable with Beck's recommendations. It would then be their intent to get down to discussing prices and terms with the bulk power suppliers.
~
I j I
} i / ')M d -
C WKC/jh , cc - Executive Group Phillips/Dicas 4 e
. . . . B.3-15 F *d ! gn ri 19L0 ~
Posas 3877 siv. 3 47 T ~. INTEROFFICE CO R RESPON D ENC E __ +, _
. .a ~
to. Mr. Wilson Cadman ;7 l,~ ." _ e. __ s . oAte. June 17, 1980 _e . __e t susuct. Visit with Mr. Gil Hanson !!iI Sr
~T. ) n . . .
__ ui _v. e __1.m m Mr. Gil Hanson of the Northwest Kansas Municipal Energy Agency was in Topeka last week to observe the KEPCo hearings. Mr. Vern Thorwald of 'd - R. W. Beck, consultant to NWKMEA was also present. Messrs. Hanson, Thorvald and I had dinner one evening and discussed the Agency's stud ' regarding their ownership in WCGSI. Some of their comments were as follows:
- 1. Agency ownership of a portion of WCGS1 as offered by KG&E appears to be economically attractive but not as cuch so as that offered by KCPL.
- 2. Apparently KCPL offered some WCGS1 ownership to the Agency and in addition offered some ownership in Iatan as well as a participation sale from Iatan. This would result in diversity of Agency resources which the KG&E offer did not have.
- 3. In figuring the selling price for unit ownership in WCGS1 and Iatan, KCPL would use the incremental costs of capital rather than the imr bedded cost as is used in standard AFUDC calculations. KCPL did not propose to add an additional amount to compensate for some of their troubles, risks, etc. Apparently .he 1983 KCFL price for WCGS1 capacity was about $1250-1300/kw.
- 4. Mr. Hanson said he understands and accepts the use of " incremental cost of capital" to figure the selling cost. I mentioned that there may be some important income tax considerations also. I said that I thought it was reasonable to expect to receive an " entrepreneurial fee".
He said he could accept that idea if the fee was a reasonable amount but not $60,000,000; e.g., between $1300 and $1400/kw.
- 5. Gil Hanson indicated the Agency is interested in a total of about 100-150 mw of WCGS1 capacity plus another 100-150 mw or so of owner-ship in other coal generation plus some participation purchases.
He was not pleased with KPL's offer of participation purchase in one or more Jeffrey unit rather than unit ownership. He said he was speaking of the needs for all but two of the State's generating municipals.
- 6. Gil indicated that KG&E should consider of fering ownership in a second unit, hopefully JEC he said, if KG&E's offer of WCGS1 ts to be attractive enough to the Agency.
(continued)
- 7. Referring to the estimated demand charges for transmission service as given to NWKMEA for their feasibility study, he said the estimate was two-three times as high as any transmission demand charge he had heard of before. He would like for us to review our estimate.
- 8. The R. W. Beck study is not yet completed. Gil Hanson would like to present the study results and assumptions to the Agency members in a month or so. First, though, he would like to clarify with KG&E the basis for some of the estimates.
- 9. Mr. Hanson said he had reviewed the version of the municipal contract which was recently presented to KG&E by the municipals. I said that from my reading of the proposal I saw several things which I found to be completely unacceptable. He asked that we not get too upset about those things but rather that we begin to talk with the municipais and explain the basia for why we believe certain contract conditions are required.
I believe Mr. Hanson would like to receive a call from KG&E management in-viting him to present tbnir feasibility results. This would also give both parties a chance to see if anything else could be done to make their analysis more complete. JRL:ke cc - Messrs. G L Koester W K Woolery R E Phillips 4
== - - - - g , y - - -w9 - - - - ----yyg,------ - - - -r-- - - - -- p - w
,- Exhibit B.4-1 . i .., - I . . i' ;- . . ~ . 4 F ~~ i ---t ).
May 15, 1974 Nr. G.W. Evans
- FT. Ralph Fiebach Mr. W.B. Walker-At a recent meeting of the South Central Electric Companics, I had occasion to discuss with Austin !bry, one of the deans of interconnegted ,
system eperations group, their recent negotiations with RECS relative to whccling charges which, incidentally, they also call "transmis:1:n service" as we do in our municipal contracts. His statement was that - their probica with Culf States goes back many years before their con-sideration of a nucicar plant, and was a source of very much concern between themselves and two other SCEC systems. Culf States finally ecided they were going to act unilaterally on this issue and come to
.greement with the RECS. The other cocpanies chose not to follow this action and his statement was, "they are now in serious troubic". The rates they charge are as follows:
Delivery at 230 kv - 400 per l'o. Delivery at 138 and 69 kv - 45c per }fo. Delivery below 69 kv - 60c per Ho. . Plus .15 mills per kwh delivered for transmission losses. - They consider their plants on their 230 kv system. We probably in the same light would consider ours on our - 138 kv system.
- Austin's statement was that these rates were vcicemed with open arms by the FPC and RECS and their difficulty in proving the rates had been very minimal. He said he had a personal feeling that they could have .
set the rates nuch higher and had them accepted, but they did try to justify in their own minds that this was a true and fair cost of service. ESH:bb we
k % i . j
', ExhibitB.4-f7 .'. n 'a 11 is . ..
Mr. E.D. Prothro December 26, 1974 l l l Cost for delivery of power across KG&E system - 5 I believe we should get some figures together on the cost of delivering power across our system. In the past we have made purchases and sold blocks of power between and among HOKAN members on the basis of an energy charge of .5 raills pcr kwh for losses and profit, and .25 mills for handling, . . with no charge for demand. This is the basis of agreement under the Cencral Participation Agreement. We presently are working out a deal' to sell the pr'ojected SPA power via EDE to KCP6L for renale to the Kansas City ' Board of Public Utilities. This transaction will only be for 1200 hours but occurs during our peak. We should have a rate similar to our Coffeyville/Chanute Transmission Schedule which is based on our transmission investment. Picase furnish us with our total transmission investment for 1972-1973, and estimated years ending 197's, 1975 and 1976. Also, please cdvise what cost of ownership percentage we.should apply. In our old contracts we have been using . 15% per year. , I have a feeling we should look at this very closely as we will probably be setting a precedent for future sales. I also belicyc we should deliver this power at 161 or 138 kv, with an adder for 69 kv or lower voltage. ESH:hh cc: GWEvans RFichach WnW.11ker CLKocater " REPhillips BRuddick
** Exhibit B.4-3 KANSAS CITY POWEl4 & LIGHT COMPANY -
o3o saoi o.ir astuut KANSAS CITY,MISSOURL G4141
.. ARTHUR J DOYLE l
2l,,~l 2.'..., January 27, 1975. File No. 0303-36 C 9 t i Mr. Peter C. King, Administrator Southwestern Power Administration . P. O. Drawer 1619 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101
Dear Mr. King:
This will confirm my telephone advice to you this , , date that KCPL, KG&E and EDE have not been able, as yet, to finalize an arrangement putting'KCPL'ln'a position to make a definitive written proposal with respect to the delivery ~' of 25 mw of SPA hy iro peaking power to BPU commencing July 1,. 1977. KCPL, KG&E and EDE have arranged to meet on February 11, 1975, and shortly thereafter KCPL will present to SPA and and 3PU s definitive proposal if_KCPL is able to.arranha a contractual path for the transmission of such hydro power and energy. I am, therefore, requesting an additional extension of - 30 days (i.e. to February 25, 1975) for submission by KCPL of ' the written' proposal under Article VII of the Power Sales - Af geement' dated December 5,_1958. I have advIsel Mr. Hogland. as to the 'aTove-~snd Tie TUtes tYat BPU 'will have no objection
~ ~ ~~
to the granting of ruph extension. - _.. . KCPL would appreciate confirmation from SPA. 9 'VED CWPl6:n O RON %1 ,, Sincerely, : .- EJAh 20 u,s k a s j l A8ttrf;n][N]^ i.JD:be " -z^'~T ._.i ~ cc: Mr. Virgil Hogland "',,'U,*.' LON.ETAcr "l-bec: !!r. Richard C. Allen Z-""C k~ *
!!r . E. S . Itallt/ Z l". ' 'I ~ /. ,!
l lir. R. E. Phillips .
,C jl ' _'7,f,'.^;"
m ::i:
.;4l;l.l . . . . .
n.,. + _- > 2. , ZME'_:...,~._
- Km
_..h,--*" _;
Exhibit B.4-4 January 29, 1975 Nk. G.W. Evans Mr. Ralph Fiebach
~
Hr. Ralph Foster j Mr . Glenn L. Koester Mr. R.E. Phillips - The attached letter from Arthur Doyle with respect to delivery of SPA hydro peaking power to BPU is not correct as far as KG&E is concerned and will cause a lot of trouble. We have and will handle SPA power any time; to the best of my knowledge, so will EDE. ESH:bb Attach
e . Exhibit B.4-5 Mr. Ralph Fiebach February 4, 1975 SPA Hydro Peaking Power to BPU , I assume there is going to be a meeting on February 11 between KCP&L-KG&E-EDE as mentioned in Mr. Doyle's letter > of January 27. . We need to discuss the rate for transmission service and a contractual path, neither of which is very clear at this stage. As a estter of fact we'do not even know where the power is supposed to be going; we have heard some rumors that it may be going to one of our municipals...namely Wellington. Please advise if Hessrs. Koester, Phillips and I are expected to negotiate this rate, or if someone else is working on it. ESHtbb cc: GWEvans / - RFoster GLKoester' REPhillips DEvans O e
- - - - ,-v-e e e- , , , e - , - , - - - -, e v e w --e- > ~ ,--v+, - --.- ,--w-n-----ew * - -~ -----, ,- - - - - - --
Exhibit B.4-6 Mr. Ralph Foster February 6, 1975 Attached is a copy of the Agreement for Interchange of ' Power and Interconnected Operation between EDE and KG6E. The Agreement has several Service Schedules for different types of service, but Service Schedule A attached comes the closest to what we are presently talking about. I would like to suggest that po.isibly we should file a new Service Schedule. This is done quite frequently for a various reasons. 2n fact, you will recall the Missouri-Kansas-Oklahoma 345 Kv Interconnection Interchange Agree-ment.has Service Schedules A through H, some of which . we will probably never use. The idea was that by having them they could be readily amended by a Letter Agreement. ESH:bb , Attach . l l - i
.n/p,(<?bYL'p*'f~j'yy,t' *- yy0 ,,
roe.,.nor ew ,.or /- I . INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE /k .- f:. .
;i. .
to, _ [ 2. . ' . T. .. , - oats. February 10, 1975 p ;* .. . j.)rr suanct, hi E hiO R A N D U hi ,,,
-!E.:. ', . _ _.u - .
- hies s r s GWEvans I. - ,,
ESHall Il tt=' ' - RFoster .;. ...' , DEvans -
',g WCadman ,L Ym t jq ; et. ,. jc f g - a=
We have understood that there was to be a meeting - on Ebr-f *1 to discuss contractual arrangements relating to 25 mw of power that S P A proposed to sell to the Board of Public Utilities at Kansas City, Kansas. I called Bob Zimmerman but learned he would be out of town for two weeks and was then able to talk to Arthur Doyle. I explained to Art that February 11 was a very busy day for us and that we would be unable to meet on thai date. He then suggested that there would be no problem with moving - it to a later time and we subsequently decided on February 19 at 10:00 a.m. on the Eleventh Floor of the Kansas City Power & Light Company buildirg. I will let you know who will cover that meeting but wanted you to know of this change in plans. I f I RF/njp
Exhibit B.4-8 M Mr. W.B. Walker $# February 17, 1975 gM ' SPA Energy to Kansas City' BPU - Messrs. Fiebach, Cadran, Foster and I are going to Kansas City on Wednesday, February 19, to discuss with KCP&L how we should handle the transfer of power and energy from SPA to Kansas City BPU. While we are convinced that it . . should be a systeerto-system purchase and sale, we may have to consider a transmission rate. I need two figures from you:
- 1. Applicable investment in transmission plant,
- 2. Annual cost (% of transmission investment).
Attached is the Accounting tabulation dated 1/28/75 showing investment and Mr. Ruddick's tabulation converting to ,
$/kw. Would you please comment on the best figure in your judgment that we should use. I suggest $1.00/kw/mo.
based on $70 average transmission value expected at about 17.1%. Please call me by telephone before Tuesday evening, if cossible. 1 ESil:bb Attach cc: RFie'ach/ b attach RFoster/ attach - WCadman/ attach e
. J' (',*j V. ( #
g llt!ll{!lIl1illI*+I. T[erWM _?'7 y I - [ gjS
)
m .
.m . n Kansas Gas and Electric Company 'r,. ' ,;. . ,, t Accounting ., I * 'i I , ; ,$3d ' Year End Investment in Electric Plant for the Last 10 Years 1-28-f5 - !- k in Service, E. P. Held for Future Use, Const. Work .i 1**IIi ll,\i_.. .(C.P.in,_ Progress and Nuclear Fuel Shown separately for Last 3 Years) , },~ , _ __
Dec. Intangible Production Transm. Distrib. General - Plant Plant Plant Plant Plant Total 31 74 CE sp.Y 7,394 85,812,902 31,857,456 79,604,c26 10,500,838 207,783,516 1965 Total Electric Plant n v. o 4M 7,394 102,257,295 37,440,596 83,162,496 10,801,294 233,669,075 1966 Total Electric Plant E4?.9 S0!! 7,284 105,138,891 43,286,082 87,800,223 11.274,767 247,507,247 1967 Total Electric Plant
> h ?: fal + ,g llb . ~ 1, ) I { * .i S i jy.....' As\ p (s <<l yf' .p k Y'~ en l e h w e ,-w. ,+-n~ , e e ,- - . - - - --.,,p--- . . . ,, --, ,7,, , --,e , . - , . y ., y 4 I understood th t th2se were ,cc: Ct.Kocater Exhibit B 4-9 14* points th2t wara sugg:stsd REPhillips' by REAa for consideration of W Whitmer credit against a transmission 1 ,, charge to them! g ,3 , . RFiebach . s, FROM Tile DESK OF ARTHUR J. DOYLE . February 19, 1975 File No. 0502-32 Mr. Ralph Ficbach Mr. Dick Allen Mr. Elmer Hall 7 Mr. Paul McInnes Mr. W. C. McCarthy Mr. D. T. McPhee * ' Mr. J. R. Miller . Mr. W. K. Frohock These are the 14 points that . I mentioned in our discussion this date. A. J.'Doy' - AJD:be Enclosure ~ '"[ _I l l ' I l l.l,LI..llllll91till 2: Ei i q k; d I'. ; l,I !(l 6'!:! . -; .,. .-.l'.,'. E 1 1 y l . - . = g . ; g j.t. l, -' - o ; ; < ! 3 a. . , , i " ' ' ' = tt.t-3 . h; .<c l -Tl1 .t . _ unm ' I lllllIlltll1llllll 1
- we e
e i. . 1. Receives power generated at KCP&L-owned resourcas.
- 2. Receives power purchased by KCP&L from other sources. .
- 3. Receives and delivers interchange power.
- 4. Receives and delivers economy power.
- 5. Delivers power to wholesec.le customers and to the KCP&L s
distribution system.
- 6. Transmits power for others.
- 7. Allows construction of larger units.
- 8. Provides reserve support between KCP&L power resources on the KCP&L system. * '
- 9. Provides multiple paths of delivery of power from source (s) to loads. - -
- 10. Allows more economic use of generation (shutdown of higher.
i dost thermal and load curve molding). I 11. Limits voltage drop - provides voltage stabilization.
- 12. Reinforces local distribution grids.
- 13. Allows lower level of reserve generating capacity through
- interconnections with other systems.
- 14. Increases fim cap 5 city of interconnected systems through .
coordinated operation of area reserves. NOTE:
- Doyle says these are credits that reduce transmission wheeling .
charges from total transmission plant in-service i.e., KG&E $70/kw - X (value for generating reserve). I don't agree, plus I would
- cdd 69 kv.
...ESHa11. 2/21/75 Exhibit B.4-lO ros ..o e KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 rw e6actmcc - February 21, 1975 I Mr. Arthur J. Doyle 3 Kansas City Power b Light Company P. O. Box 679 Kansas City, Missouri 64141 ~ J - Dear Arts m Just a short note to inform you that we have read the draft - of your proposed letter to Peter King and believe that it will be v satisfactory. Please send us a copy of the final letter. Sincerely, e / - s/ UN ~ ! v. I * * ' h- is , - \l . ~~ ~ig a y y = acer - gFE3i. id/5I: RF/m ma u"e n n . r', ~ ji HA . t. 6 . ,l ea a.e , ,.s bec-Me o s r s. Evans ,i- ' ."[,, , b Hall Cadman y - ,; . . [_ ~ .'.'_ (, "_7 j .~.-' : : ". : ~ - .w. , -. .2 . , L . .. '2. ._i. 1.~~. .. I ==m. .l. Cl .-~g . .1._ >s- - .- L, g - g t. . - e . m m ,e .,_:,;f KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY __u_ g -.;..,
- ins"4 ,~ -,
1330 e'L18MOf4C AVENUE . m., ,$ N,' KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI G4141 g,,,, , , , , , , ARTP(UR J. DOYLE - m, , q--n r"** m _ .1 -- m...... - l7, r. ,.- ,- .... m File No. 0: } rm= v,_ . ,un = mm._z_ . '",~~ =_I Mr. Peter C. King, Administrator ~ Southwestern Power Administration --- O,7 i P. O. Drawer 1619 i;~_j Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101 } 7;^y
Dear Mr. King:
This will acknowledge receipt of your February 4, 1975, letter. As mentioned in my January 27 letter, KCPL, KG&E an,d EDE have had an opportunity to meet and I am pleased to report posal under Article VII of the Power Sales Agreemen ' December 5, 1968. As you may know from Mr. Sanford, there are several' items in the 12/18/74 draft of theSome proposed SPA-BPU Contract which are merely languag'e items but others giveg KCPL some concern. For example, this draft would are important substantive matters. permit the delivery of hydro to that peaking extent,energy at a rate in excessgoes b of 25 IW and, at leastThere are other substantive and language re- ' 1974 notice to KCPL. visions which we believe would be appropriate. 12/18/74 Subject to resolution of certain revisions in the draf t of the proposed SPA-BPU Agreement, KCPL proposes that: .
- 1. The SPA-BPU Contract provide for delivery of up to 25 IN to BPU at SPA's 161 kV Carthage Substation bus for a term of 20 years beginning June 1,1977 (so as to compo Agreement with BPU).
- 2. BPU enter into a contract with EDE to sell and deliver the hydro peaking power and energy to EDE at SPA's 161 kv Carthage .
Substation bus where it should be available to BPU from SPA. -
.9 'e
b_ . . Mr. Peter C. King , 2- February 19, 1975
.- ~
- 3. It is my understanding that under an existing Inter-connection Agreement EDE would then be willing to sell and de-
~
liver an equivalent amount of electric power and energy to KG&E under a Service Schedule to supplement the EDE-KG&E Inter-connection Agreement.
- 4. I further understand that KG&E would then be willing to sell and deliver an equivalent amount of electric power and '
energy to KCPL under a supplemental Service Schedule to an . existing KCPL-KG&E Interconnection Agreement. .
- 5. KCPL is willing to sell and deliver to BPU an equiva-lent amount of electric power and energy under a supplemental Service Schedule to the KCPL-BPU Municipal Participation Agree-ment dated July 8, 1964. Such Service Schedule would provide that BPU will reimburse KCPL for the amounts paid KG&E therefor plus KCPL's then current Long-Term Transmission Service rate ~ *
(now 55c per kw per month) plus agreed transmission losses. If the above proposal is acceptable to SPA and BPU,'I suggest that the first order of business should be to- perfect the proposed SPA-BPU Contract. I suggest that all parties be given an opportunity to furnish to SPA and BPU written com=ents and suggestions with respect to that draft. Thereafter, I would expect that BPU should contact Mr. Richard Allen, President of EDE, to arrange the BPU-EDE Agreement. If you or BPU should have gny questions concerning this proposal, please 'do not hesi-tate to contact me. Sincerely AJD:be . e e e e e.
' Exhibit B,4-ll , .! - t ,u ,rs A 9
l FEb L IS/b U N '^ i D ~.
. ~ ~
KANSAS CITY POWElt & LIGHT COMPANY -- y ".; .---l .
' suo eaumont avcNuc h.h ,2 I"~
KANSAS CITY. MISSOURI 64141
' ^"7,E " "~ . February 25, 197hl "." '.#-Y . .... . em,- .".m ,
File No. 0303-36 q; 9__ .,_ , ,,, _ L-
.n.y*... * , -X g. ., ;J. ~' , , Q~#-a.tT r I'-- n. - -
Mr. Peter C. King, Administrator 7 "-
~ " "
Southwestern Power Administration --
' . .F-2-- -
P. O. Drawer 1619 - Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101 , [{
Dear Mr. King:
This will acknowledge receipt of your February 4, 1975,* letter. As mentioned in my January 27 letter, KCPL, KG&E and , EDE have had an opportunity to meet and this letter is submitted as KCPL's definitive proposal under Article VII of the Power Sales Agreement dated December 5, 1968. , As you may know from Mr. Sanford, there are several items in the 12/18/74 draft of the proposed SPA-BPU Contract which give KCPL some concern. Some are merely language items but others are important substantive matters. For example, this draft would permit the delivery of hydro peaking energy at a rate in excess of 25 MW and, at least to that extent, goes beyond SPA's October 23, 1974, notice to KCPL. There are other substantive and language revisions which we believe would be appropriate. . Subject to resolution of certain revisions in the 12/1.8/74 draft of the proposed SPA-BPU Agreement, KCPL proposes that: ! 1. TheSPA-BPbContractprovidefordeliveryofupto , a 25 MW to BPU at SPA's 161 kv Carthage Substation bus for a term of 20 years beginning June 1, 1977. (so as to comport with the June 1 - May 30 Contract Year un er KCPL's Municipal Participation Agreement with BPU).
- 2. BPU enter into a contract with EDE to sell and deliver the hydro peaking power and energy to EDE at SPA's 161 kv Carthage Substation bus where it should be available to BPU from SPA.
TV w
=. '* "j. . Mr. Peter C. King -
2- February 25, 1975
- 3. It is my understanding that under an existing Inter-connection Agreement EDE would then be willing to sell and de-liver an equivalent amount of electric power and energy to KG&E under a Service Schedule to supplement the EDE-KG&E Inter- -
connection Agreement.
- 4. I further understand that KG&E would then be willing to sell and deliver an equivalent amount of electric power and
- energy to KCPL under a supplemental Service Schedule to an -
existing KCPL-KG&E Interconnection Agreement.
- 5. KCPL is willing to sell and deliver to BPU an equiva-len amount of electric power and energy under a supplemental Service Schedule to the KCPL-BPU Municipal Participation Agree-ment dated July 8, 1964. Such Service Schedule would provide that BPU will reimburse KCPL for the amounts paid KG&E therefor plus KCPL's then current Long-Term Transmission Service rate , ,
(now 55c per kw per month) plus agreed transmission losses. . If the above proposal is acceptable to SPA and BPU, I suggest that the first order of business should be to perfect the proposed SPA-BPU Contract. I suggest that all parties be . given an opportunity to furnish to SPA and BPUThereafter,written comments I would and suggestions with respect to that draft. expect that BPU should contact Mr. Richard Allen, President of EDE, to arrange the BPU-EDE Agreement. If you or BPU should have any questions concerning this proposal, please do not hesi-tate to contact me. Sincerely AJD:be g cc: Mr. R. P. Fiebach Mr. R. C. Allen 1 Mr. Virgil Hogland j *\ - bec: Mr. M. Mr. E. P. S.McInne/s Hallt Mr. D. T. McPhee .
" e - - - - - ,,
Exhibit B.4-12 re m ses
~
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 me mLECNM CmW ()' h - $Y 9 t Mr. Fiebach g ,/ g February 27, 1975 .j,.nf A.
,yevtp<
auy fa. Ly Ladh - There may be one or two comments about Mr. Doyle's letter 3 of February 15 to Peter C. King. While I don't like BPU contracting with SPA direct, I don't -
- have a better suggestion; however, in the letter agreement under the existing interconnection agreement with both EDE and with KCPkL ,
it seems to me it would be better if we did not refer to either BPU v or SPA but only mention that the contracts were contingent on EDE making a certain amount of power available to us; and further,
.a contingent on KCP&L taking a certain amount of power. ,_
RECEIVE'.~ .
~ OPERATING h
ROOM 501 ,,
' ./ '/
g FE8 271975i
&/.) l ,*"'!l*"" ...
_!an . c. . ~
.. en -- ' ~
_ . i f' T.z" _ i, s. ,,a sva#r
-a_ .: 'u - ~ b 2 GWE/m _..
__ m. F ^ r
- _ .__. ..j cc-Meaers.ESHall - kd Co** 8cf JQ ._1..._
RFoster . 4 +S.
*
- emee.. .
4 4.D W
*- * *em
_ .L.' : .. . . .
. . . L l. . ~ I . k. . . . . ...l ..,
- v. . - .
Exhibit B.4-13 May 14, 1975 Proposed Transmission Service Schedule - MEMORANDUM Attached is a draft of proposed Service Schedule T for Transmission Service. This was prepared to be made part of the Interconnection Agreements with KCP&L and EDE. I realize we have tentatively decidt d , to make the SPA sale and purchase party-to-party, however, both 74P&L and EDE have transmission schedules. We have one that applies orly to Chanute cr'd Coffeyville. In preparing the draft I have lifted portions from the Coffeyvilla/ . Chanute contract and from the Transmission Schedule furnished to me by Austin Mary of Gulf States. I put some figures under the rate which should be verified or changed according to our transmission plant in service for delivery at these voltages. As a matter of information, Gulf States' rate for delivery is as follows: Under 69 kv...............$0.60 per kw per month 69 kv and 138 kv..........$0.45 per kw per month 230 kv....................$0.40 per kw per month , In addition to such charges, another charge of 0.15 mill per kwh will be made to cover losses. 1 The sulf States contract could be a formula for calculating these rates for trancmission plant and investment cost. Any comuments you j have on the draft would be appreciated. ESII:bb Attach'- cc: GWEvans RFiebach WBWalker GLKoester REPhillips i i U 4, *
,. 9 g a A **
4
-33,,,q u.. Q.w..w-- ,-. ..v L' __ ____ _ .. 6- ___ _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
O - i Service Schedule T l Transmission Service ' This Service Schedule T is agreed to be effective onI t/oiv / , ; 19 7o , and as a part of and under that certain Electric Interconnection Agree-ment dated va/E J o , 19 1 , between the City of 8e#TEveru f , . Kansas, and Kansas Gas and Electric Company. It shall apply to the said parties for the purposes and in the manner as set forth in this Service. Schedule T. This Schedule cancels and supersedes that Service Schedule A dated June 1, 1966. Section 1 - Transmission Service . . Transmission Service as used herein shall mean the use of the facilities of the Company for the purpose of transmitting electric power and energy from one generating municipality to another.with whom the Company has Interco6nection Agreements substantially similar to this Agreement. Such electric power and 4 energy may be generated by or received by a generating municipality located in the company's service area, and shall be used by the retail and wholesale customers served by the. City. . Nothing in this Service Schedule T is intended to imply a privilege to use Company's facilities for any other purpose; nor is the City entitled , under this Service Schedule T to withdraw any power or energy from the Company's system which is not simultaneously balanced by equivalent input by'another genertting municipality or municipalities in the Company's service area. Any ' l withdrawal by the City which is in excess of the corresponding input by the other City or Cities (minor inadvertent flows excepted) will bu censidered a purchase of power from the Company under the Service Schedule which is cErrently applicable. T-1
Section 2 - Availability The City shall advise the Company in writing by a Letter of Intent of its transmission capacity requirement by July 1 of each year for the annual
. . period 18 months in advance, provided that the present contract demand is to.
be changed. 1 For its part, in no event will the transmission demand be specified by the City at less than 2500 kilowatts, nor will the demand exceed 20,000 kilo-watts, except by mutual agreement. Such written notice, upon acceptance by the Company wili become binding upon both parties unless and until thereaf ter amended by mus ' agreement.
,Upon delivery and acceptance of such written notice, the Compahy will hold in readiness the transmission capacity therein specified for the use.of the City at such times as the City in its sole judgment may elect to use it to transmit power and energy to and from another participating generating municipality or municipalitiqs in the Company's service area. The City, in turn, agrees to pay for the spccified transmission capacity being reserved for its use whether or not it is actually needed. -
Section 3 - Adjustments within Contract Period In the event the City utilizes transmission capacity in excess of the amount specified in the Agreement and the Company agrees to furnish such , transmission capacity, the billing demand shall be adjusted upward by the amount , of such excess. The City agrees to confirm suel adjustuent by issuing a supple-mental Letter of Intent for the new Local capacity requireeents, which shall , bu effective.from the date such excess capacity was supplied and extend for i twelve (12) months thereafter. 1 T-2
If Company is not agreeable to providing such additional capacity for I said period, City shall pay for such excess capacity only for the billing month (s) in which the excess is supplied. Section 4 - Payment for Transmission Service For Transmission Service supplied under this Service Schedule T as - set out in Section 2, City shall compensate Company monthly at one-twelfth'(1/12) of the following annual rate:
$2.00 per kilowatt of demand based on tre amount of electric power and energy trans- . .
mitted to or received from another partic- , ipating generating municipality in the Company's service area. , Tax Adjustment Should any tax, federal, state, or local, in addition to such taxes as may exist on the effective date of this Schedule, be levied upon the Trans-mission Service provided hereunder, or upon the electric power and energy transmitted under this Schedule, or upon the capacity provided :. Jer this Schedule, or the receiptsfor revenue therefrom, (but not including federal or state corpocate income taxes), such tax may at the election of the Company be added to the compensation due it under this section of this Schedule. Section 5 - Term This Service Schedule T shall become effective on the date hereof and shall continue for the same period as and concurrent with the Electric T-3
B O <
?. . . . Interconnection Agreement of which this Service Schedule T is a part.
Executed as of the date hereinabove written. CITY OF derFEy U/ L A.E , KANSAS ATTEST- - By / l,l ,,f/n:ph jA _ C- u.st C 4 g. ~'"'~' f',
- Cit'y Clerk (Resolution authorizing Mayor's signature attached) e s ,
a 1 KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTEST:
,y [ , ~wuna .
7 ,. . ,.a s\. . t 4 ./ sensrvicePysident Secretary f f o e T-4
I / Jti ota ts. .! - is . , 3 ()Ps !. ' i l , x E0]u Set
- yFEi,I h'
_ , w.c n w - _SCl!EDULE TDC (REVISED) -@,e Schedule of Charges for Transmission -l . m
- L'd.! ,
and/or Displaccment of Non-Federal Power and Energy "' *~ Over the System of SPA
-P' Effective: .-~ 7 E -;; . v During the period from May 13, 1974, through June 30, 1976. -
f..k . .'J { Available 3~ :~ l j 5 8' In the service area of the Southwcatern Power Administration (STU wholesale power customers of SPA and other electric utilities wh3% to '. , , .. transmission of SPA. facilities interconnect with the transmission facilities Non-Federal power and energy will be, by contract, transmitted and/or displaced over those portions of the transmission and related facilities owned and operated by SPA (System of SPA) in which the Administrator, SPA, in his sole judgment, determines that transmission . and transformation capacity are and will be available in excess. of that required to market power and energy pursuant to Section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 890)., Character of Service: . Non-Federal power and energy will be received into the System of SPA as scheduled by SPA and transmitted and/or displaced between two points on the System of SPA as specified by contract, as alternating current, [ 3-phase, at approximately 60 cycles per second, and at the voltage at the point of points of delivery. Schedule of Charges: l Compensation due SPA each month for the transmissioa and/or dis;-lace-ment over the System of SPA of non-Federal power and energy shall be computed at the following rates:
! it 7p .Afr o;4 *1 (i) $0.25 per kilowatt of Transmission Ubmand for the' Q p,pf,nJ On h transmission and/or displacement of non-Federal power and associated energy to point or points of i . 4 'e ,, ,, i delivery from the System of SPA at 138 Kv or 161 Kv.
- Jo A b'U e' p.,e -(ii) $0.35 per kilowatt of Transmission Demand for the J- transmission and/or displacement of non-Federal
+' ' ',, / power and associated energy to point or points of delivery from the System of SPA at 69 Kv.
- he e c ' e'/? * '
y vo . e ' i \
, , *f,. ; > 'ja 4 p) r ~
O I . J
/
4 l l . - - .. . -
I,W ..'.
- 2 (iii) $0.60 per kilowatt of Transmission Demand for the
/
transmission and/or displacement of non-Federal
- power and associated energy to point or points of delivery from the Systes of SPA at voltages of 15 less than 69 kv.
' > ' . '#* (iv) $0.0005 per kilowatt-hour for the transmission
[g. , and/or displacement of non-Federal energy:-without
*',,:.4 ' ' g,. ., ' associated non-Federal power to point or points f"' of delivery from the Systen of SPA. .e l ,. Transmission Demand: 'I The Transmission Demand for each point of delivery for any month shall be the number of kilowatts equal to either (i) The maximum rate in kilowatts at which non-Federal
- power and energy was delivered from the System of
't SPA at such point of delivery during any sixty-minute period during such month, or p (ii) the maximum Transmission Demand established at such point of delivery at any time during the proceding eleven months.
i y== whichever quantity is greater. J' Minimum Monthly Bill: I Ihe minLrum bill for any month shall be equal to the rate times the san 1 of the Transmission Demand for each point of points of deliverj for 1 such month.
. I ; Adjus tmen t for Power Factor: .
An hourly power factor shall be maintained at each-point of delivery of not less than 90% lagging. If during any hour during such period l in any particular month it is deter =ined that at any point or points 4 of delivery: . i (i) The actual rate of delivery of power and energy I during such hour exceeded 40% of the Transmission - Demand for the month; and . (11) The hourly power factor at such point of delivery
; was less than 90% lagging, d
Exhibit B.4-14
~,. -' h 1 11
- sos virr any.i.or
. . . . . . ' . : <a ;c .,,., n !, - - ' <;- 1 . .g INTEROFFICE CO R R ESPC N DENC E ,"
l ~~ I ' ,
/~ ,
__ _ .- {~
- jg . . ,- -
- 10. Mr. W. B. ' iker
_ , w r ?.n n ,< .7 .
, ,_i_. . ,. . r . ;_
g aA t. E ** -
~ ~
oArt. May 23, 75 7 . . y.s w w , su anc t, p
.2'" . .L q_.
O I have reviewed Mr. Hall's draft of a Transmission Service schedule j to be used in conjunction with Empire District Electric and Kansas . ... i City Power and Light transaction.
~_T. .T.
I have no serious disagreements with the draf t other than the rate .- ; section. My recommendation using only above the investment on-138 ..- kv lines and substations and above would be as follows: . .
"For Transmission Service supplied under this Service
- Schedule T as set out in Section 2, Buyer shall compensate Company at the following monthly rate:
$0.55 per kw of demand, plus 0.15 mill per kwh to compensate Company for losses."
For purposes of this Schedule, I do not think it advisable to break m out charges less than 138 kv. In the future, for supplying trans-mission service f rom Wolf Creek, we will have to make a similar study to determine a rate including 69 kv delivery. This will require separating the Central Kansas and Southeast Kansas 69 kv system. Attached is a copy of Mr. Hall's draf t with my remarks on it. I will be glad to discuss this at your convenience. 1 i 4 BWhitmer: eld i Attach. cc: Messrs. E. S. Hall R. E. Phillips .
*
- DRAFT ESil:bb
. 5/9/75 SERVICE SCHEDULE T
_ TRANSMISSION SERVICE This Service Schedule T is agreed to be come effective on
, and as a part of and under that certain f Ett Agreement between [ #* ",
i j and Kansas Gas and Electric Company dated
\J . It shall apply to said parties for the purposes and in the manner as set forth in this Service Schedule T.
( Section 1 - Transmission Service
- 4
/+sy Transmission Service as used herein shall mean the use of Company's facilities for the purpose of transmippting electric power; and energy from one point of multiple interconnections to another point use of delivery.
Section 2 - Availability N- / shalladvisetheComj>any ia - '+4 ng by a Letter of Intent of 16s transmission capacity requirements by July 1 of each year for the annual period ht eighteen (18)~ months in -
.m advance. Upon delivery and acceptance of such written notice, Company will hold in readiness the transmission capacity therein specified.
In the event transmission capacity is utilized in excess of the amount specified in the Letter of Intent and the Company agreesito furnish p .. /. ~ such transmission capacity,lthe billing demand shall be adjusted upward , by the amount of such excess. If Company cannot provide such additional capacity for the remainder of the period,
- ,-n - - . , .,.-y -- ++ -- ---r
.' =, e . ; l l Service Schedule T 2. l shall pay for such excess for the billing month (s) in which the excess is supplied. in iurn agrees to pay s%- for the specified capacity being reserved for its use, whether or not is is actually used. E03 Section 3 - Application-This Service Schedule T shall be applicable to transmission ~ service for the period and the purpose stipulated in the Letter of Intent signed by each party. I , ,, , Section 4 - Rate
*ss;The rate for Transmission Service is based on the transmission .
plant in service,sd,ivided s. by the system peak during the contract year.
/ It will remain in effecE'until renegotiated upon request of either party.
een s' l$ The 1)llowing rates shall be effectiv,e for the nominal voltages specified:
/.N N 161/138 kv ............ $0.6Q per kw per month * ~
69 kv.................. $0.75 per kw per month 12 kv. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1. 25 per kw per, month i In addition to such charges, another charge of 0.15 mills per kwh will - be made to cover losses. O 'n -)
- LO -l I I . ,#.o : '~ w /d e lw ^>
,, , l l o p' + ' i~. . o r.
I v e s, e e.I~ Section 5 - Term . This Service Schedule T shall become effective on the date hereof and shall continue for the same period as and co,ncurrent with the =
, - -, , -~ . - - - -, - - ,
- - ~ ~ . . . . - . . .. . .. .( ? - - 6 . -
Service Schedule T. 3.. , of which this Service Schedule is a part. Executed as of the 'date first hereinabove written. . KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTEST: By
- (Title)
Secretary . . O e e i ATTEST: paus By (Title) Secretary 4 - 1 m 4 E 0 % O O .
4 e e s
. hl$ ' ), '
ff Y } . N- el e (,t wi' r. i i i 1.1 'll L i l l' .. li v .
' IN ' e a u t. ..i w spoNCENCE * * !* W# * '
13
- i - J' f),~/.c tb I
e'.'5 ( Joplin, Missouri July 30, 1975 - jj,I' 3 St:.ye M- l r:.! eaeoIW The following is a summary of a meeting held in the Joplin office e p/,/f 3
'"I on July 29,1975, at 2:30 p.m. with Ralph Tearney, Director of Production Planning, and Gilbert Hanson, Senior Planning Engineer, both of the Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas. The meeting was at the request g of Ralph Tearney to discuss the purchase of _25 mw of power from SPA which by various contracts would involve Empire, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Kansas City Power and Light Company and end up with Board of Public Utilities, Kansas City, Kalisas. Our attendance was by R. C. Allen and M. P. McInnes.
At the beginning of the meeting Ralph Tearney indicated that he was really in the Production Department and had a lull in his production planning at this time so he was thereby probably temporarily involved in' this. He asked that this be more of a preliminary meeting with a later one scheduled to finalize results. Dick indicated this was agreeable to him, - so this would be a planning meeting to put some concepts on the table. Ralph indicated they were interested in some type of figure for m wheeling of this power from SPA through our system so that they might get a handle on the overall cost to them. Dick answered that we had done some pencil pushing but had not arrived at a definite figure. We had arrived at an approximate figure that was close to the Kansas City Power and Light Com- .l pany established rate but that we historically and for a purpose have stayed clear of -the concept and practice of wheeling. We have made numerous short term arrangsments whereby we purchase power from one utility and re-sell it . to another and that is the way we would prefer to handle this. For instance, in the past when we purchased power from Public Service Company of Oklahoma and sold it to Associated and Associated called for so much of this power to be delivered, if we have it available on our system, we may supply it ourselves or we may choose to call for it from Ptblic Service Company of Oklahoma, but this gives us the option of either supplying it ourselves or calling for it - . from the original company and this gives us more flexibility in the purchase and sale of power. By past practice we have always bought and sold from neighbor to neighbor. Our mark-up is to take care of our invement cost plus losses and handling cost.
-- a ~
Gilbert Hanson asked about purchasing this at the Carthage SPA . . bus and selling it across our one line section to Kansas and thereby not involving our total system in the investment cost. Dick answered that this power will come into our system from various source,s or various ties with other utilities, including the Neosho tie with SPA, the tie with Arkansas Pcwer & Light Company at the far end of our system and the tie with our .
~
Morgan substation and, therefore, we could ne dedicate only one line sectton
" for the use of this power. Also, our customers support out total investment in transmission facilities and it would not be. fair or equitable to them to take a piece out of our system and dedicate the 25 mw of sale to that one section of line. In this manner we had arrived at about the same cost that Kansas City Power and Light Company had arrived at -- this was in the 50 to ,
60c per kilowatt month range. This is the investment that our customers have in our transmission and by rights if scme other utility is going to have use of that investment, they should pay their proportionate cost of this. Gilbert then said it was somewhat of coincidence that each of the y companies have a 55c per kilowatt month figure but if you add them all to- M - gether this would still be an overall cost of 50 to 55c per kilowatt month Nb (lumping the total investment into one figure and dividing it by the total N
'79 8#
kilowatt peak). Dick answered that he understood what he was saying but by
*I.ccl the same token we had to look at our own customers and our own investment - Gr>*,
and our particular portion of this investment was at the rate of 50 to 60c' e
~
c. c per kilowatt month. Dick stepped out for a minute for a telephone call and Gilbert asked about other ties and other contract paths. I answered that perhaps. there might be but this was the one that was under discussion. He was think-ing of Associated and that contract path up to Kansas City Power and Light Company and perhaps an overall cheaper contract path. He was a little con- . fused as to the contract path designation and tried to again tie this into one particular line so again I went through the concept of Empire and a Kansas Gas and Electric Company, for instance, with, the contract path being between companies and utilizing the tie line capability of all ties between the two companies, not restricting this to one particular terminal. The question of scheduling came up and their concept was they would have to schedule this power with Empire and Empire do the scheduling
i
, , r .'
- l
~ ~~ .
3- l with SPA, Kansas City Power and Light and Kansas Gas and Electric. The - - ' other concept which we had had was that they would contact Kansas City Power and Light who would in tmrn contact Kansas Gas and Electric Company who would contact Empire and we contact SPA, or perhaps Kansas City Power
- and Light act as scheduling agent, as they do in the MoKan Pool, whereby Kansas City Board of Public Utilities would contact Kansas City Power and ,,
Light Company who would in turn contact Kansas Gas and Electric, Empire ' and SPA. This is a detail that can be worked out at a later date. We set the time for our next meeting at 1:30 on August 19, in Joplin to have more definite ideas on our investment costs per Kilowatt and also on contracts. e Mr.T sk M. P. McInnes MPM:EH cc - Mr. Arthur Doyle y== Mr. Elmer Hall t O i
( (f f. l*.4tU d 'A E J1ibit B.4-16 g ht)> . rYlA i THE EMPIRE DISTRl[T ELECTRit C0mPAnY b .f A 9 0;o.$.P J0PLIN. MI550URI 64808 * /as/;t. h d$~ M. P. MetNNEs June 18, 1976 wtCE PetSi3 TNT *O*tnavnONS Ms. Frances.E. Francis Spiegel & McDiarmid 2600 Virginia Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 i
Dear Ms. Francis:
The contract for the 25 mw of power for Kansas City Board of Public Utilities is in rough draft form. Our attorneys will look it over next week and we can hopefully finalize it and mail it to you the following week. I will be out of my office the week of June 21st but plan on being back June - e 28th. I would presume that you will wish to contact Mr. Glen Koester of the Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, and Mr. Arthur J. Doyle of the Kansas 'ity J P;wer and Light Company on their contracts and procedures
- to pass this power an its way to Kansas City Board of Public Utilities.
In particular, please. confirm that Kansas City Power and Light Com-pany will be the scheduling agent for Kansas City Board of Public Utilities. Also, our normal method of handling the purchase and sale of wholesale power is as follows: We would purchase this power from Kansas City Board of Public Utilities. They would invoice us for the power they schedule each month. In turn, we would invoice Kansas Gas and Electric Company for the power scheduled to them under a sales contract. Kansas Gas and Electric Company would in turn invoice Kansas City Power and Light Company who would invoice Kansas City Board of Public Utilities. Our invoice would be in two parts. The first part for the demand of 25 mw and the second part would be for the energy scheduled. t If you have any questions on this, I will be back in my office most' of the week of June 28th and'will be glad to answer them. In the meantime, our contract with Kansas City Board of Public Utilities w ll be developed along the above lines. Sincerely yours,
* . d .
MPM:EH . cc - Mr. Art Doyle Mr. Glen Koester ___ ,_ ee ! _ llll MU_Ill'I_fl I ! l ! I nT e m le s . n,% -
." s ~ , 4 -
r , .s' ' t q jd ? ' l
;q :;\ J . 'n- '
l r. { s-it _ l. I!l L' j i .* j ,
- i "mm IID \\\fl x ,' ; ,' l ,-[
# Exhibit B.-4-17 cc: RFitbach , . RFoster REPhillips 1 THE EMPIRE DISTRIET ELECTRIC C0mPany / RECElVED ,,73 jg neum. mssoum 54ses omum a
- j. g oc wt 5
m N0y :713/6 4 November 15, 1976 . se M. P. MclNNES ___ va perssocar-oecmanons i e, . _-"~E.,1_..- .,r_ ,-
- a- 'A J ;- -i-F-/ :.- - i ~. --
Ms. Frances E. Francis, Esq.
~
T . .5 Ti~:~ '
"" '"- r-Spiegel & McDiarmid "
2600 Virginia Avenue, N.W. Oj_I'."*~- Washington, D.C. 20037 [W..
Dear Ms. Frances:
. W. . . . . -C ,, _
r..w .. . i AttachedisthelatestdraftofthePurchaseandSalesU'I?[.I;._ Agreement between The Empire District Electric Company and Board'.._ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- - of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas. -
,C*C . - -, ---v-- -:. ~- ..
I presume by now that Mr. Art Doyle of Kansas City Powa g{_ _ _,,_~_~,_{' and Light Company has contacted you regarding a meeting of all w =- parties concerned on December 8 at a time and location to be speci- - - fled by Mr. Doyle. I have reserved this date for this meeting and hopefully we can mutually arrive at contracts for the delivery of
- this power from SPA to the Board of Public Utilities.
5 This draft, which you have, is marked preliminary and subject to modification during this meeting. As I mentioned, the escalation associated with construction of generation and trans-missien facilities, fuel costs and other related items, gives us concern about the 25c demand per kilowatt mark t.p and the 10% energy mark up. These items were marginal at the-beginning of the contract discussions and contract provisions need be included which would per- . mit us the option of at-least recovering our costs in this area. I would appreciate your reviewing the draft and if you have any questions, forwardidg th6m to my secretary, Einora Hunt, for her *
- forwarding to me during'my vacation the next couple of weeks.
I normally touch base with my office frequently during vacations and will, therefore, become aware of any developments or schedules as they occur. t . i Sincerely yours, c . MPM:EH Enclosure , , cc - Mr. Art Doyle !~ -Mr. G. L. Koester
=__. . , - _ - _ . . _ -
,Prolimintry Dratt ,Movstbsr 13, 1976 POWER PURCHASE CONTRACT Between .
THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY And - BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, City of Kansas City, Kansas THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into this day of 1976, by and between The Empire District Electric Company, a Kansas Corporation, duly licensed to and transacting the business of an electrical utility in the States - of Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Arkansas, hereinaf ter called EDE and Board of Public Utilities, City of Kansas City, Kansas, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas, acting through its duly authorized officials (here-inafter referred to as "BPU"); WITNESSETH, That, WHEREAS, EDE, a Kansas Corporation, operates a utility system within - e the States of Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri and Arkansas, consisting of generation.
. transmission and distribution facilities together with interconnections with other -
utilities including the Southwestern Power Administration and the Kansas Gas and~ , Electric Company, and WHEREAS, BPU has purchased a quantity of power and energy from the Southwestern Power Administration (S.P.A.) for delivery to the interconnection - between EDE and Southwestern Power Administration at EDE's interconnection poin't in the SPA substation at Carthage, Missouri, and BPU desires to receive this power and energy into the BPU system but has no direct connection with SPA, BPU desires, to make arrangements for the delivery his power and energy by negotiating contracts with intervening companies. EDE Company hereby agrees to purchase this. power and energy from BPU at the Carthage SPA bus and to resell an equiva-lent amount of ow r and energy to.the Kansas Gas and Electric Company by means of an existin* nterconnectionagreementwiththeKansasGasandElectricCompany-(f) presently filed with the Federal Power Commission, with such delivery being under: rate schedules to be filed to recognize this contract. BPU also agrees to designate the Kansas City Power and Light Company as the scheduling agent for this power and energy and EDE's sole responsibility
- nb he Carthage SPA willbetopurchasethepowerandenergydeliverejh,byS 4 s, pdHe -
bus and to sell and delivery power and energy ee);Kansch as an& Electric Company at our interconnection with Kansas Gas and Electric Company.' This sale and deliv-cry of power to be in accordance w'ith the schedule received from the scheduling -
, , , +
anent. EDE reserves the right to modify the SPA schedule of power and energy de-livery to the Carthage bus within the limitations set out in the S?A - TPU contract on peaking contract demand, peaking billing demand and the. limitation set out for b ,. peaking power / peaking contract demand and for supplemental energy and excess energy. The delivery of this power and energy shall be contingent upon the other clauses in this contract dealing with uncontrollable forces, termination of this contract, t breach of contract, acceptance by the Federal Power Commission of this contract and the rate schedules contained therein, and the conditions set forth in Article V, Section 9 of this contract. - ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1. Contract Year. The term " Contract Year," as used herein, shall mean the twelve-month period beginning on June 1st of each year and extend;- , ing through May 31st of the following year. Section 2. System of EDE. The term " System of EDE," as used herein, shall mean the transmission and related facilities owned by The Empire District Electric Company which are utilized to purchase, sell and deliver power and energy to EDE customers. Section 3. Month. The term " Month," as used herein, shal mean the i nin o . 4 i' iod b ghem c hu)n
%wuthe first p'r ytwwmwm. 'f, and extending .; r, n. a .o*t o hrofhbhelastdayb.feachmonth.
Section 4. Uncontrollable Force. The terdt 'llncontrollable Force," as used herein, shall mean any force which is not within the control of the party affected, including . but not limited to, failure of 'sater supply, failure of facilities, rior contractual commitments, flood, earthquake, storm, lightning, fire, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance, labor disturbance, sabotage, or f restraint by court of general jurisdiction, which by exercise of due diligence aad foresight such party could not reasonably have been expected to avoid. ARTICLE 11 DESIGNATION OF SCHEDULING AGENT BY BPU Section 1. Statement of Intent and Purpose. It is recognized that, pursuant to the agreement date . 197 , between BPU and Kansas City Power and Light Company, a purchase of not to exceed 25,000 kilowatts' of hydro electric power and energy purchased by EPU from SPA under the BPU - SPA a Contract # , will be scheduled for delivery by Kansas City Power and Light V [ Company as scheduling agent for BPU. A&
// 4 e I id
Section 2. Designation and Authority of Scheduling Agent with respect to EDE. (a) The scheduling agent is hereby authorized to establish by agreement with EDE from time to time, such scheduling, metering, and energy accounting pro . cedures as may be appropriate and necessary to provide for the delivery of the hydroelectric power and energy purchased by BPU under the SPA - BPU Contract, and to prepare and submi to EDE, in accor. dance with such procedures, schedules. for the delivery by SPA ED of such energ , d M .gyPppepower,andlu between SPA and EDE at the arthage, Missouri ww 't ,., Wy, Lefy
- to the interconnection interconnect. ion a..d the intercon-nection between EDE and KG6E respectively, and to accept from and furnish any and all energy accounting statements and notices related thereto, with the same force and effect as could BPU acting through its duly authorized officials. -
(b) # EDE agrees to furnish to BPU and SPA achedules for the deliveryf9 - of energy from BPU to EDE and which are in addition to the schedules furnished by the scheduling agent. EDE will furnish copies of these schedules to the
- g scheduling agent for his use under Article II, Section 2 (a). #
ARTICLE III ' PURCHASE AND SALE OF HYDRO POWER AND ASSOCIATED ENERGY BY BPU - Section 1. Purchase of Hydro Power. BPU shall sell and deliver, and fs g I EDE.shall purchase and cause to be received, 25,000 kilowatts of hydro electricM pcuer with associated ener8y as provided in Section 1 and 2 of Article II. i Seection 2. Sale of Hydro Power. (a) EDE agrees to sell and deliver-25,000 kilowatts of power and associated energy to Kansas Gas and Electric Com - pany subject to Section 1 and 2 of Article II of this contract. Section 3. The followi /ng definitions shall apply to the purchase and cale of Hydro Power under this Contract. (1) The " Contract Demand" for any month shall be the maximum rate in kilowatts at which EDE is obligated to receive and to delivery energy sold by BPU during such month under Sections 1 and 2 above. (ii) The " Billing Demand" for any month shall be the " Con-
- tract Demand."
, +
i w p>yY* e j . , J u i- * '( p~-
Section 4. Scheduling of Energy. (a) Energy scheduled by BPU under Section 1 of this Article III shall be at Nrake not greater than the , Contract Demand. 2 Thisrateofenergyscheduledshallbe{h symofalltp of energy, (peaking, supplemental, excess, etc.) scheduledkuri an) our. Section 5. Compensation by EDE to BPU. (a) BPU shall sell the Hydro Power and energy to EDE at the same rates, terms and conditions set l' orth in the Section of the BPU - SPA contract noted b. low: (Section 6 of Art icle III of this contract) and BPU shall promptly notify EDE of any change in the rates, - o terms or conditions of thetBPU - SPA contract. The Contract demand cannot be increasedwith'outthYc$[ tee $tofEDE.&all [ Section 6. This section shall include all of Article III and Article IV of the Power Sales Contract between SPA and BPU # and shall be
- updated concurrently with any changes in this SPA - BPU Contract.
,Section 7. _ Compensation by KG6E to EDE. (a) EDE shall sell the hydro- '
i power and energy to the Kansas Gas and Electric Company under our existing inter- E connection agreement dated November 6,1958, under Service Schedule J-1. understood and agreed that the rates and/or terms and conditions set forth in It is ' f'f I Service Schedule J-l may, with the confirmation and approval of the Federal Power' Commission, be increased, decreased, modified or superseded at any time and from " time to timo and if increased, decreased.. modified, or superseded, they shall ' become effective as of the date specified in tne order of the Federal Power Com-uission containing such confirmation and approval. E shall promptly notify trU and'KG&E in writing of such change in t>e effective rate' schedule.
' The rates and/or terms and conditions in the said r scheduleJJ-1 ,
revised are the then applicable rate schedule as. increased, decreased, modi-fied, or superseced and if for og g o,tgshtocontinuethesale . to EDE and the resale by EDE to KGuE"of.such hydro power and energy, BPU shall within twelve months af ter reccipt of notice from EDE of this change in rate scheduleJJ-1,(or for any other reason) notify EDE in writing of its election to terminate this contract, such termination to be effective as of May 31 of the contract year specified by BPU but not earlier than 12 months, nor later than 36 months from the date of receipt b E of go ce f gU. All power = and energy sold to EDE and resold to KG&E under this contract during the p~eriod . until the effective date of such termination shall be paid' for at he rate and/or terms and conditions as confirmed and approved by the Fkeral P$wer - g ef e e Commission. -
. Ab '
Section 8. Point of Delivery. (a) The point 'of delivery for Hydro
.. . . . _ = - . . . . . . - .
Peaking Power, Perking Energy, and Supplemental Peaking Energy purchased by
~
EDE under this Contract shall be at the 161 kv point of electrical intercon-nections between the System of SPA and the 161 kv system of EDE in SPA's sub-station at or near Carthage, Missouri. p(b) It is recognized that an equivalent amount of power and energy purchased under th.is, Contract _wi.ll be delivered from the System cf EDE i.. n the
$j q<mu..<, %enWdrooD(WTh -p System of KG&E for the account of BPU in accordance with the schedule received from the scheduling agent, and it_is expressly understood and agreed that respon- 97 sibility for such power and energy passes to and is vested in when such 't power and energy is delivered from the System of EDE into the System of KG&E,;
and that EDE neither has nor assumes any responsibility or obligation under this contract for the transmission or displacesent of such power and energy , from the System of EDE to the load centers of BPU. , ARTICLE IV ACCOUNTING, BILLING AND PAYMENT ' Section 1. Billing by BPU. 'BPU shall maintain an accurate record h of the power and energy purchased by EDE under this Contract, and on or before y the 20th day of each month shall prepare and submit to EDE a billing statement 6# 4 v setting forth in necessary detail the quantities of power and energy purchased Y by EDE during the prceding month, and the compensation owed by EDE to BPU for ' such power and Energy. - )t' Section 2. Payment to BPU. (a) Billing statements rendered to EDE by BPU shall be due and psyable 30 days from the date of receipt of each
# ~
statement at: ,
~
(NOTE: Ms. Francis - Please fill in correct address). ARTICLE V EFFECTIVE DATE, TERM . AND CONTINGENCIES Section 1. Effective date and term of Contract. This Contract shall become effective on the date of its execution by the parties hereto, and shall remain in force and effect until midnight, May 31, unless sooner terminated as provided herein: Provided, That either party hereto may, at its sole option, terminate this Contract without penalty as of June 1,. 1987 or as of June 1 of any year thereafter, upon not less than 36 months, ID ,
ndvance written notice; and Provided further, That if for any reason the SPA - BPU Contract (attached hereto as Exhibit "3") is terminated, then and in that event this Contract ipsct facto shall terminate and be without further force or effect as of the effective date of such termination of said SPA - BPU C tract, except that the rights of the parties hereto, if any, which may have accrued prior to such date of termination shall be and hereby are preserved. Section 2. Start of Service. . The delivery of power and erergy u'nder this Contract shall begin on June 1, 1977. Section 3. Termination for Breach. If either party hereto breaches a material provision of this Contract, the other party, at its option, may terminate this Contract upon 30 days' prior written notice of its intention to do so, and this Contract ipso facto shall terminate at the end of such , 30-day period unless within that period such violation is corrected. If, however, such violation is corrected but damages are claimed by the offended party for such violation, then such' termination shall be effective 30 days after the amount of such damages has been finally fixed by a federal court - of competent jurisdiction, unless within that period such damages or amounts are paid by the offending party to the other. Neither party hereto, however, shall be considered to be in default or breach with respect to any obligation under this Contract if preacnted from fulfilling such obligation by reason of an " Uncontrollable Force." Section,4. Remedies of Parties. . Except as otherwise specifically provided, nothing contained'in this Contract shall be construed to abridge, limit, or deprice any party hereto of any means of enforcing any remedy, either
/ .
at law or inequity, for the breach of any of the providions hereof. . Section 5. Waivers. Waiver at any time of rights with respect to a default of any other matter arising in connection with this Contract shall
- I l
not be deemed to be a waiver with respect to any subsequent default or matter. - Section 6. ~ Notices. Any written notice, demand, or request, re-quired or authorized under this Contract shall be deemed properly given to or served on EDE if mailed to: . Vice President-Operations . The Empire District Electric Company 602 Joplin Street - Joplin, MO 64801 i
Any such written notice, demand or request, required or authorized under this con- - tract shall be deemed properly given to or served on BPU if mailed to: (NOTE: Hs. Francis - Please fill in.) . The designation of the persons to be notified, or the address of such person, may be changed at any time by either party. Section 7. Reports and Information. Each party hereto shall furnish ' to the other such reports and information concerning its operations which affect this contract as the other party may reasonably request from time to time. Section 8. Transfer of Interest. Any successor to or assignee of the rights of BPU, whether by voluntary transfer, judicial sale, foreclosure sale, or otherwise, shall be subject to all the provisions and conditions of this Contract to the same extent as though such successor or assignee were the origi- ' nal contractor hereunder; and Provided further, That the execution of a mortstge .
. or trust deed, or judicial or foreclosure sale made thereunder, shall not be deemed voluntary transfers within 'he t meaning of this Section. -
Section 9. This Power Purchase Contract and Service Schedule is subject to and conditioned upon the granting of such necessary approvals and authorizations by any commission or other regulatory body or agency whose appreval or authorization may be required by law, and upon the completion and acceptance of the contracts required to provide the contract path from SPA to BPU; EDE to KG6E; KG&E to KCP&L Co. ; and KCP&L Co. to BPU. -
, Tile EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTEST: I Vice President-Operations By Title .
Tile BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS
- By -
ATTEST: Title By Title ,
F SERVICE SCHEDULE J-1 INTERIM PO'JE!t SERVICE. This Service Schedule J-1 is agreed to on to be effective under, and as a part of, that certain Agreement for Interchange of Power and Interconnected Operation dated November 6, 1958, between The Empire District Electric Company and Kansas Gas and Electric Company, hereinafter re-ferred to an Interconnection Agreement. , Section 1 - Interim Power Service - Interim Power Service as used herein shall mean electric power and accom-panying energy made available by The Empire District Electric Company ~(EDE)'to Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KGE) as certain Interim Power is available from Kansas City Board of Public Utilities to EDE during the effective term of this , , Schedule. Section 2 - Availability ' EDE agrees to make available, and KCE agrecs to take and pay for, capac-
- ity in the amount of twenty-five (25) megawatts, for the period from June 1, 1977 through May 31, 1997 unless sooner terminated.
KGE is entitled to schedule energy up to the amoust stat ~8 sbove in accordance with the schedules submitted by the scheduling agent for the delivery Of power and energy under the SPA - BPU contract except when prevented'from doing so due to causes beyond the reasonable control of EDE which prevents the capac ~
.ity from being made available, including but not limited to, the transmission
- cystem capacity.
1- .. . The capacity will e' delivered in accordance with a daily schedule which will be furnished to EDE System Operator by the scheduling agent in ac-cordance with the conditions set out in the SPA - BPU Contract # or as otherwise mutually agreed upon. This schedule shall not call for abnormal
- or unreasonable hourly changes in or continuity of delivery.
Section 3 - Payment for Service ,. For Interim Power Service made available hereunder, KGE shall pay to
- EDEeachmonthacapacitychargeofEDE'scostplus25hIper kilowatt per month regardless of availability. The energy charge to b E per kwh scheduled shall be the price per kwh to EDE plus 10%.
'/ '
(- This may need to be updated.
m' Section 4 - Term . This Service Schedule shall become effective as of the date hereof and eball continue in full force and effect through May 31, 1997, at which time it chall terminate unless sooner terminated under the terms of the EDE - BPU con-tract. Executed as of the date first hereinabove mentioned. , THE DIPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY By ATTEST: Vice President-Operations Secretary , , Affix Seal KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY . By ATTEST:
~~~
Secretary Affix Seal
~
I e e
Exhibit B.'4-18 ; i l l Mr. Ralph Foster December 20, 1976 SPA =BPU-KG&E-EDE-KCPL Meeting You will remember it was decided that our next meeting would be on January 18, 1977 in Kansas City, Kansas at 10:00 a.m. At that time it was hoped we would be able to finalize the various Service Schedules for the SPA power to BPU. , , I now discover thac I have a SNUPPS Management Committee * , @"' Meeting in Chicago on January 18 and I should be in attendance. ,71V p s2h If you want me in Kansas City on that date, could you possibly k j,ps** '[ 9 s t arrange to have the Kansas City meeting changed to January 19. .. Please let me know. M, ] 9, '[tih 1 GLK bb i O e i
Exhibit B.4-19 f December 14, 1976 Mr. R.P. Fiebach Messrs. WBWalker/ Wm. Whitmer / Mr. G.W. Evans , pbef 4' Attached is a copy of the attendance list for the meeting held on December 8,1976 in the office of the Board of Ep Public Utilities, as well as the suggested marked-up draft f/)f# 7 of the SPA Power Sales Contract with the Board of Public Utilities. I thought you might like to have this information to review the SPA /BPU Contract. The next meeting is scheduled for January 18 in Kansas City, Kansas. At that time it is hoped that the companies involved e in the Power Sales Contract from SPA to BPU will have their Service Schedules ready for signature by the participants.
- c. %
GLKabb
$ Attach cc: RFoster RPhillip factach , - - - . .e --- - - - , . , - . - - --,- -----, . . -
Wc . /O:0 0 R- /.2.- 8 ? /> ll bcb4r SIw Vn l3. M
-l, l$ances Frdnuh BfL) .' GLQ=p )WW "
Mcett f 6 S T6/L KG +& ' l vi,44 ret i D. ...FEA.zXE 3.P.8.
- Paue in e iivas s
. E, n. g i
Ja +nd. Be e r.s , 4, D. E , 5 fBSNoN Goe x.Ls DEI ! Sib Itrhn .. ... l.l 0 :.W
%yhat. .
xer e - I i e . . 1 . . . . _ . . , I i l
- l l
- l .
i
. 1 . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . .
i . . . . l l l l l I 1 - _ _
~ . . AL f/e Exhibit B.4-20 4 ~/, g4 LAW 0"rtCr5 ,
SI'llcuni. A McDI Aluit1) 2600 VIRGINI A AVENUE. N. W. WASHINGTON. D. C. 20037 TELEPHONE (202) 333 4500 (EESGE SPIEGEL PETE R M. M ATT DEC&dit C. McClARMID DANIEL J. GUTTM AN SANDRA J. STRE BEL BONNIE S BLAIR KOIERT A. JABLON DAVID A. GIACALONE JAMES N HORWOOD ALAN J. ROTH JAMES CARL PJst'_OC4 FRANCES E. FRANCIS ROBERT HARLEY SE AR @ANIEL 1. DAVIDSON ,, THO1:AS N. McHUGH. JR. ,, Arthur J. Doyle, Oq. Mr. M. P. McInnes Kansas City Power or oight Company Vice President-Operations 1330 Baltimore A /enue The Empire District Electric Kansas City, M5souri 64141 Company P.O. Box 127 , , Ralph Foster, Esq. Joplin, Missouri 54801 Kansas Gas & Electric Company
- P.O. Box 208 Walter Felzke, Esq.
Wichita, Kansas 67201 Southwestern Power Administration P.O. Drawer 1619 . Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101 Gentlemen: According to my telephone conversations with you or your Staff, this is to confirm that the meeting scheduled for January 18 relating to the purchase of 05 MW of power and energy from the Southwestern Power Administration by the Bo' erd of Public Utilities of Kansas City has been cancellca. It has been rr. scheduled for February 14,1977,,at.1:30 p.m. in the main building of the Board. By that time, we , hope th'5f7111 parties will have circulated drafts and other documents relating to the transaction. if you are unable to attend or send a representative prepared to discuss ,_ the issues, please contact me at 202-333-4500. FrT/ED c; S.incerely, d . m :i e,
- . d s 1.u:_,1977 ti?
Q [. & .L...
.---g-.-
r :i; , Frances E. Francis - Attorney for the Kansas City E6atd of.'. Public Utilitics --- J; =
.' ._' . .p cc: Philip Lorton, Esq. t-5---.,.._,,,,,j-; .
Gilbert llanson -
. . ..L-..'.
FEF:kim '
...g e
l- .::.2
- _. . . . . . - ~ .. _ _ . . - .
Exhibit B.4-21 SPA-571 5-12-66 ,,, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR g 2<;, Southwestern Power Administration g. Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101 - ROSTER OF ATTENDANCE (PI. EASE PRIhT) 4)llt/,!,7 ' N .i...; Organization Place of Meeting Date and Time of Meeting ,, .
'S.
NAME ORGA'iIZATION g ADDRESS k' Mi o, t i, ~. t. s e t .n b. ., i a: }l,ll ., .i Ahkr Sin 'ku. Bra CmdL' .
- s TY WbSYG b a cAuk . 'bRAAldA
_ N'.P L
- hos Suu.m ~ Xcpt Gi/Nwsn' BPu M/ L,L RPG ALw '
A t' Oc ~ i &~ wave xiln g kn..n d',w t e
~ ' . EDE ., ^ -t,,y /S <: , c, );~ /*) 1.~ .s Y'
t J PA*L M e / M Mff L~n K Y. A M-11 4': vf L. A . 3 %u ic.ett. vP- -
/[ O/ ~97k~/} 4 7 6 ) NG/E LhwyEL 6620rWV(t7tm :.
( ' L. ' / // ,- 0 eej *** . * * -g e, = q . s,. e
- ExhibitBl.4-374#
pl ff/ht4p> /7. NffC _j),J. L. .5V %/h 6 KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY '
#33o BALTIMORE AVENUE KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64141-March 2,197 7 Mr. Glenn L. Koester Vice President-Operations Kansas Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 208 Wichita , Kansas 67201 . .
Dear Mr. Koester:
I would appreciate at your earliest convenience any comments or suggested changes to Schedule F, Interchange Service, which I sent ' to you by telecopier on Thursday, February 17. I am sure that any suggested language changes that you may have would be acceptable to KCPL. To avoid any misunderstanding or ill-feeling on the Board's part, I believe we should get a draf t of a rate schedule between our companies in their hands at the earliest possible date.
. Very truly yours,. .
Aab Frank L. Branca ' Rate Engineer c, u, c.) :t ni ! FLB/kd 3 El s . ..o; *. E77 e
? \ ' 'i cc: A. J. Doyle , ., .3 . o l ~.~~.=.
l l l l l ' I . *__ ... . J l
Exh} bit B.4-23
/h ./t 1
Mr. Wm. Whitmer March 8, 1977 Proposed KCPL Service Schedule F - Attached is service Schedule F - Interchange Service, which Kansas City Power & Light Company is suggesting be used between KG&E and KCPL on the 25 kilowatts of SPA power going to BPU. Mr. Phillips and I are in agreement with the addition of the three words on page 2 under the " energy" portion of Section 3. *- I have not had an opportunity to discuss this with Mr. Foster as he is in charge of handling all of these arrangements. Will you please look this over and give me your conments as soon as practicable. GLK bb ' Attach 1 PS If you think this is agreeable, do you see any reason it could not be used for a similar ' transaction with EDE. l
" ~ . ..i x
( g \,
.w cc: RFoster 'D"'*
REPhillips l DRAFTo l ....GLK:bb
,o . ,-- e 2-16-77 ,;;[7 jgff . .l " /n ** h'E u,, FS/kd ~ . _ _ ' _ . f~
f~ STRVICE SCHEDUI.E F 1l__ . ' . . . -
. IN7ERCHANGE SERVICE .:.6 ~
This SERVICE SCHEDtH.E F is agreed' to on , 1977 to be effective hereunder, and as part. of, that certain Interchange Agreement dated March 27, 1963, between Kansaa Gas and Electric Company (KOR) and Tansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL), as supplemented by Supplementary Agreensent No. I thereto dated June II,1965, herein referred to as " Interchange Agreement". Section 1. Interchange Service Interchange Service as used herein shall aman 25,000 kilowatts of elec-tric power (Interchange Capacity) and accompanying energy (Interchange Energy) . to be inade available by KGE to KCFL based on the announts of power and accompanying energy roads availabic to KGE by The Ecipire District Electric Company (EDE) under service schedule __ to that certain Agreement for Interchange of Power and Inter-connected Operation dated November 6,1965, herein referred to as "Intercon-nection contract:". Section 2., Scheduling and _ conditions _ KCPI,, through ita dispatcher, will submit to the KCE dispatcher on or be-l fore the ILfteenth (15th) day of each month or the last business day preceding the 15th day of each month if the 15th day is a non-business day, an estimate of the total munbar of kilowatt-hours of Interchene.e Energy to be requested froen KGE for delivery and sale to KCL'L during the following enth (which KcFL shall , procoptly confirm in writing), and on or before 10:00 a.m. on Friday of each. week shall also submit hourly schedulee thereof (which ch=Il proinpely be confirmed
- 'in writing) for the following week, which hourly schedules may ~pe changed by l
KcFL at any titse prior to 10:00 a.m. preceding the day a new delivery schedule
i I is to be ef fectivo. Changea shall promptly be confirmed by RCPL in writing if requested by KGE provided that KCE shall not be obligated to deliver to KCPL
+.
during any month Interchange Energy in excess of the amount of energy unde avail- l able by EDE to KGE during such month under Service Schedule _ to their Intercon-nection Cone.ract. KGE shall have the right to cancel, curtati or interrupt any I scheduled delivery of Interdlange Capacity and Interchange Energy to be received - I hereunder by RCPL from KGB when due to ari Uncontrollable Force on RGE's or EDE's t nystems as defined in Article V of the Interchange Agreement to which this service schedule F is attached. *
- Section 3. Rates and Cha rges Capaci ty: KCE agrees to make available, and RCFI, agrees to take and ,
pay for Interchange Capacity in the a:munt r" 25.000 kilo ' i watts at a monthly rate equal to coat of Ir .:rchange Ca-pa: tty plus 4 per kilowatt, As used herein, the term
' Cost of Interchange capacity' shall mean the irnthly obli- ,
gation incttrred by KCE for capacity purchased a made available from EnK under Service Schedule _ to the Inter- ; connection Contract. ; Energy: KCPL agrees to pay for Interchange Energy delivered by l KCR at a rate equal to cost of Interthange Energy plua Y( yt ' j
.4t_% for ' $ ' mills per kvh), As used herein, the term ! ' Cost of Interchange Energy' shall mean the cost per kwh to KGE for energy purchased or made available from EDE -
under Service Schedule to the Interconnection contract. . Section 4. Ters , This Service Schedule F shall become effective as of the date of execy-tion hereof and abatt continue in tutt force and effect until superseded by a . l L
- i i
substitute Service Schedule F filed by KCE and made effective by the tuavern-mental regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, provided, however, that this Service Schedule shall terminate on May 31, 1997, or earlier upon and concur- ; rently with tetinination of any one or more of the following: ! Service Schedule _ to that certain Interconnection Contract be , [a] , tween KCE and EDE dated , 19 . f I [bl Schedule P to that certain Wnicipal Participation Agreement dated j 1 July 8,1964, between KCPL and the Board of ibblic Utilitter, of ! Kansas City, Kansas,
. . i Nothing contained herein shs11 he construed as affecting in any way the right f I
of the party furnishing service under this Service Schedule to unilaterally 6 l make application to the Federal Power Couxatesion for a change in rates, charges, } classification, or service, or any rule, regulation, or contract relating thereto, j under Section 205 of the F .dcral Power Act and pursuant to the'Commaission's Rules ,
*and Regulations promulsated thereunder. ,
I l . KANSAS GAS and ELECTRIC 00MPANY - [ by l Vice President f ATTEST:
, {'
Secretary i KANSAS CITY IWR & LIGHT COMPANY ' k l BY Vice President l ATIEST: '3 r l [ l 3 secretary J gg(please deliver to Betty Blair in Nr. Koestner's office) [ (from F. Branca at KCPL) l C i
Exhibit B.4-24 a e' POsan 1877 ety. I.47 e, - INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE TO' Mr. Glenn L. Koester DATE' April 12, 1977 susuct, g@M1 . 0 Attached is a copy of the proposed Service Schedule F of which you asked for comments. I have made a few minor suggestions but have no real disagreement with the basic schedule. I agree with the three-word addition in the energy charge. This may be difficult to support with FPC, but we can probably find a way. The only serious question I have' is *
- Part (b) of Section 4. I don't think we would want to be in the ,
position of not having a buyer but still having to take power from EDE. Possibly we would want to terminate concurrently with (a) and (b). . In general, the schedule appears to be adequate for the EDE transaction. r%-
! /*
BW: eld O . Attach. '
- cc
- Mr. W. B. Walker -
f . . . .
, '.'r , .i.;4G .
\ s y I.*J ot.1 LGI o
~ ?" }
j:,' APfl 1019// :: l l
~ c r - . . . . . .~
3*~
~ ..,.n. ,
7 ;, . --- l 2C 'h L_
.1 C. .1_ . .
_. q _ __, _. = l
.~ '~ . .. I * '
JZ 3,-.
... U9 ^.~T.5.~'~.- . C: :' u' ..: ..t.. ... . 3_ . . . . . . . ..J'
--- Exhibit L.4-2; ~
men urr nv.s.sr INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE To, Mr. Glenn Koester oAis, May 10, 1977 5UBJECT. , I have a couple of further comments pertaining to Section 3 Rates and Charges, of the BPU deal with Empire District Electric. Relative to the capacity portion of the monthly rate, I believe the appropriate adder to the EDE charge is 639 per kw. I think the energy portion should be revised to re as follows: ENERGY: KCP&L agrees to pay for Interchange Energy
. , . j/
delivered by KG&E at the higher of a rate equal *
/ to the cost of Interchange Energy plus 10% or ~~ > application of the following formula to '- Interchange kwh: . @..?i PJ 1377 -
e- (A x X x B) x 1.05 = C f_.
~.tr i
Where:
- 1. L.__ . . . - --. .
_ !_a .. , r,- : ~ - - A = Interchange kwh purchased from O__'.L. ...
- l. ~!
. EDE under Service Schedule f
'---- --(i - f to the Interconnection Contract [
.s .. . 6 . /, '->~
X = KG&E 138 kv transmission losses [
' "~ .. (vill be supplied by Lucas next week) l - 1 . B = KG&E cost of generation from the -
last preceding month.
. . , - . - . . - 1.05 = 5% adder for dispatching, l _ ~ ~ ~ ~. ". L ' N _ bookkeeping and margin.
As used herein " Cost of Interchange Energy" shall mean the cost per kwh to KG&E for energy purchased from EDE under Service Schedule to the Interconnection Contract. In addition, under Section 2, Scheduling and Conditions, I would like to delete the words "during any month" and "during such --- - month" appearing on the third and fourth lines of pa e 2.
? ,..s**
BW: eld ,. /' i cc: Messrs. W. B. Walker R. E. Phillips G. W. Evans
.. m . , Exhibit B.4-26 ~
oce nrr env. a.sr INTEROFFICE CO R RESPON D E N C E !- O.
~~ ;.: ... .R ,
k'A'.laIS// E *) to. Mr. Glenn Koester _? 4
.g ., _t _.
oats. May 11, 1977 D "-
-- f . . ~
b s' L,. .I
$ U sJ f ct. _, ,,n _ g ,_
My letter of May 10 included a formula to be used in the ~ T!Oiz.7, ,7 energy charge calculation in the BPU Empire District Electric ~
- q- -
deale , I knew what I wanted to say but as Mr. Walker sagely pointed ._ .h ) out the formula did not accurately convey my thoughts. The --- -l following is the formula in the fom it should be in:
~- ; . . Z;J~
9_ : _ _ _ - .-,.; . , ENERGY: KCP&L agrees to pay for Interchange Energy .i._...__,' ,J~ delivered by KG&E at a rate equal to the zi.,.. i * ,- cost of Interchange Energy plus the higher of 10% or applice. tion of the[following formula: - (A x B) (C x 1.05) = 0 Where: A = Interchange kwh purchased from EDE under Service Schedule to the Interconnection Contract.
} B = KG&E 138 kv transmission losses (will be supplied by Lucas next week). g C = KG&E cost of generation from the last preceding month.
1.05 = 5% for dispatching, bookkeeping and margin. D = Add to cost of Interchange Energy. As used herein " Cost of Interchange Energy" shall mean the cost per kwh to KG&E for energy purchased = from EDE under Service Schedule to the Inter-
- connection Contract. > ----
W: '
"7 ,
BW: eld g * //E.fd , bc: Messrs. W. B. Walker R. E. Phillips G. W. Evans
. Exhibit B.4-27 May 12, 1977 Mr. Ralph P. Fiebach Mr. Ralph Foster Mr. R.E. Phillips Mr. Wm. Whitmer Mr. G.W. Evans Re Proposed KCPL Service Schedule F I would appreciate receiving your coments on the attached . Draft #1 of Service Schedule F with Kansas City Power & Light Company. This covers the 25,000 kilowatts of SPA power between KG&E and KCPL going on to BPU.
e
- GLKabb
, Attach
. Exhibit B.4-28 Mr. R.E. Phillips and Mr. Wm. Whitmer June 7, 1977 Proposed Service Schedule K - EDE 1
4 911 hV yM ' Attached is a new draft of Service schedule K with EDE which Mr. Cadman handed to me today. It was sent to Mr. Fiebach by Dick Allen. # Will you please review this and be prepared to discuss it as soon as Mr. Foster is availab3e to do so. GLK bb Attach con WCadman RFoster 0
- 7 ,7 t Exhibit B.4-29 d
eoe= nri eiv. i.47 't / , l--. ] INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
- 70. Mr. G. L. Koester DAf t. July 20, 1977
$ USJ EC T: "
I feel uneasy about our SPA-EDE-KCP&L-BPU tiansactions which began July 1, 1977 without signed contracts or FPC approval. Bill Whitmer has not been notified to file with FPC.- Neither Vern Corkle of EDE or Arnold Samuels of KCP&L have other than + verbal instructions to recognize and facilitate the proposed SPA-BPU transactions. So far in July we have recorded 13 daily schedules amounting to - 1900 MWH's. Unless I hear otherwise from you, we will continue to honor the BPU-SPA schedules and perhaps you can expedite the approved service schedules with KGE, EDE and KCP&L. Without at least a draft copy of the proposed agreements with EDE and KCP&L, we will have a difficult job preparing billing , for the month of July. f ..__E.C.C IV L ' 6.- i g .. L 16 '. . 1
,)
a: 5 JJ' i. . 13//
/
- i i.a ,.;.uw~;- i
- .C _E1 ~_.'~ '- ~~ ~ C C REP:es , _ - .'.. . _)_ - '"~' Y~~ ~
l
,i e
f
-e ..seee e - ..*e. a + an- e g--- - - ~ - . - -
4 I:. %,
- Exhibit B.4-30 H. t 4 a w 1 JUL7/191T '
-_ L &L':)., ' 'Yu a THE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC ComPARV 7'(( '
mun, miseni uni --j, o,U _
- . . . =
July 20, 1977 ; y; ;,' _ rev m _,,
.
- i f - . *e R. C. ALLcN .m :%e...
**ne s es .e*Vir e ts ._. .
n
- N\JI T . . . ,
In f . E 4 '.Il 4 .,,, _ ..
. U 4 *i f4 .
u r.wa . , _ n n..s , Mr. Ralph Fiebach _ ev.= nrr_ _ Chairman of the Board and President j;'d, ----- Kansas Gas and Electric Company - 'ne P.O. Box 208 -- [",'$, _ --- Wichita, Kansas 67201 ---
Dear-Ralph:
In accordance with our telephone conversation this af ternoon,1 . . am enclosing seven executed copies of Service Schedule K. I am also enclos - ing one copy of the service schedule which you sent .to us for execution,
- but which required the change noted thereon. The enclosed seven copies include this change.
If you will execute these on behalf of Kansas Gas and Electric
- and return them to me at your convenience, we will file with the FPC, including our supporting data and the required filing fee of $500.
In some cases it has been more convenient for th! concurring party to send the Certificate of Concurrence and the required check for
$100 along with the contracts when they are filed by the seller.. If this is your desire, we will be happy to include this concurrence and check to the FPC with our mailing. If not, we will state in our filing that the .
concurrence will .,e mailed separately by the buyer. Please let me know your desire in this regard when you return the contracts. As previously indicated, I am enclosing :'seven executed copies
- of which we would like to have four copies returned to us at your convenience.
Sincerely.
.g I
f\
- i ,
RCA:dh Enclosures 8
, .; .. . .._.9 Exhibit B.4-31 Auaust 15, 1977 Mr. R.C. Allen, President The Ecpire District Electric Company P.O. Box 127 602 Joplin Street Joplin, !!issouri 64802
Dear !!r. Allen:
In accordance with your letter of July 20, 1977 to Mr. Fichach, we are rotu'minq four executed copics of Service Schedule K for Peaking Power Service. We are also enclosing 4 sittned copies of the Certificate of Concurrence, tocether with our check for $100.00 for the filina fee, to include with your nailing to the Federal Power Cor:rsission. We would appreciate receivina a copy of your filing to FPC in order that our file on the matter is conplete. ' Sincerely yours, t CLK:bb ' Attach cca RPFlobach . RFos ter/ Attach WBWalker/IDrile (attach) - thf,;hitmer / Attach REPhillips / Attach
- COPY SERVICE SCllEDUII K Peaktnn Power Service This Service Schedule K is agreed to on July 1 , 1977, to be effective under, and as a part of, that certain Agreement for Interchange o$
Power and Interconnected Operation dated November 6,1958, between The Empire District Electric Company (EDE) and Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KC&E), here-t inafter referred to as " Interchange Agreement". Section 1. - Pecking Power Service Peaking Power Service as used herein shall mean electric power and accompanying energy having the following characteristics: , .
- 1. Maximum one-hour demand --- 25,000 kilowatts for any and all classes
- of energy available during any hour
- 2. Maximum Peaking energy usage --- ,
(a) 30,000,000 Kwh in one contract year June 1 - May 31 (b) 15,000,000 Kwh in any four consecutive months (c) 5,000,000 Kwh in any one month
- 3. Minimum Peaking energy usage --- 1,500,000 Kwh in any one month
- 4. Additional energy may at times, and from time to time, become available and willthenbemadeavajlabletoKG&E.
Section 2. - Availability EDE agrees to make available to KG&E peaking power and energy as certain power and energy is ave *.labic to EDE from its resources. EDE shall have the' right to canec1, curtail, or interrupt any scheduled delivery of power and energy to be received hereunder by KC&E from EDE when due to an Uncontrollabic Force, as provided in Articic VIII of the Interchange Agreement to which this Service Schedule is attached, and including but not limited to the transmission system capability.
. ?
4 Section 3. - Scheduling By 2 P.M. on Thursday of each week, KG6E dispatcher will furnish to EDE dispatcher a schedule for delivery of said peaking power on an hourly basis for cach day of the next calendar weck. Daily schedules rn..y be changed at any time prior to 1 P.M. of the day preceding the day a new delivery schedule is to bc . effective. Changes shall be promptly confirmed by KG6E in writing if requested by EDE. Section 4. - Payment for Service For Peaking Power Service made availabic hereunder, KG&E agrecs to take and pay for each month in accordance with Section I herein above: Capacity: 25,000 kilowatts of contract demand, regardless of availability, at a monthly rate equal to the EDE procurement cost of like capacity plus an allowance of $0.25 per Kw per month. . Energy: Accompanying energy scheduled and delivered at a monthly rate equal to (a) 1107. of EDE procurement cost of like energy, plus (b) an allowance to compensate EDE for losses incurred, computed as follows: (1) 3% of energy delivered cach month, times (2) EDE's average cost per kilowatt-hour of . l generating and/or purchasing the highest 15% increment of its "not energy for load" during the preceding month. "Not energy for load" is defined as System Net Cencracion, plus Energy Receipts, minus Energy Deliverics, as reported monthly on FPC Form 12E-2, or any successor form of such Form 12E-2. Section 5. - Provisions EDE's_ performance under this Service Schedule is subject to and con-forth in this Service Schedule being
.tingent upon the terms and conditions set
[ . _.
~ 3-approved by the Federal Power Commission or such other conutssion or other run-ulatory body or agency whose approval or authorization may bu required by law.
Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting in any way the right of the party furnishing service under this Service Schedule to unilaterally - make application to the Federal Power Commission for a change in rates, charges, classification, or service, or any rule, regulation, or contract relating tl.creto, under Section 2.05 of the Federal Power Act and pursuant to the Commission's Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, provided however that notice of any such application shall be given any other utility affected 30 days prior to filing with the FPC. . Section 6. - Term This Service Schedule K shall becomo effective on July 1,1977 or st.ch , date that power becomes availabic to EDE for delivery hereunder and shall co'ntinue in full force and effect until midnight May 31, 1980, unicss earlier superseded by a substitute Service Schedule K filed by EDE and made effective by any gov-ernmental regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, provided, however, that the' parties shall mutually seek any necessary approvals of any said substitute Service Schedule,K. At the option of EDE this $crvice Schedule K shall terminate if at any time such peaking capacity should become ' unavailable to EDE. , Executed as of the,date first hereinabove mentioned. TIIE EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC COMPANY By C - - - > President ATTEST: e Secretary' . KANSAS CAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY By MMe dd Vice President - Operations
~ ATTEST: \& N
. Conformed Copy KANSAS GAS ANC ELECTRIC COWANY OLENN L.sOEstE n vect poteses set opanassesse CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE This is to certify that Kansas Gas and Electric Company assents to and concurs in the Service Schedule described below which The , , Empire District Electric Company has filed, and hereby files this . Certificate of concurrence in lieu of the filing of the Service Schedule specified. Service Schedule K dated July 1, 1977, between The Empire District Electric Company and Kansas Gas and Electric Company for Peaking Power Service for the period July 1, , 1977 until midnight May 31, 1980. - KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
/s/ Glenn L. Koester By Vice President - Operations' Date: August 15, 1977 .
'**" d' Exhibit B.4-32
, KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P.O. Ban 208 Wochola, Kansas 6720) v.e etscra.c c-w August 19, 1977 Mr. J.R. Miller, Vice President Kansas City Power & Light Company P.O. Box 679 Kansas City, Misaouri 64141 J Dear fir. Miller m I am returning to you for filing with the Federal Power Commission four executed copies of Service Schedulo F for Interchange Service. We are also enclosing four signeil conion of the Certificate of Concurrence and our check for $100.00 fc r the filing fee. Wo would appreciate receiving a copy of your filinty to PPC in order that our file on the natter la complete. Sincornly yours, EENs i . KOESTER GLK:bb Attach cc RPPiebach Pfoster/ attach WDWalker/IDFile(attach) WmWhitmor/ attach PEPhillips/ attach AJDoyle, KCPL 8 A
, ' COPY SERVICE SClli:DULE F lt!TERCilAtlGK SERVICE This SERVICE SCllEDULE F is agreed to on July 1, 1977, to be effective hereunder, and as part of, that certain Interchange Agree-ment dated March 27, 1963, between Kansas Gas and Electric. Company (KGE) and Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL), as supplemented by Supplementary 5greement No. I thereto dated June 11, 1965, herein referred to as " Interchange Agreement".
Section 1. Interchange Service Interchange Service as used herein shall.mean 25,000 kilowatts of electric power (Interchange Capacity) and accompanying energy i (Interchange Energy) to be made available by KGE to KCPL subject to availability.and based on the amounts of power and accompanying energy made available to KGE by The Empire District Electric. Company (EDE) under Service Schedule K to that certain Agreement for Interchange of-Power and Interconnected Operation dated November 6, 1958, herein referred to as " Interconnection Contrac't". Section 2. Scheduling and Conditions KCPL, through its dispatcher, will submit to the KGE dispatcher on or before the fifteenth (15th) day of each month or the last business day preceding the 15th day of each month if the 15th day is a non-business day, an estimate of the total number cf kilowatt-hours of Interchange Energy to be requested from KGE for delivery and sale to KCPL during the following month (which KCPL shall promptly confirm in writing), and on or before 10:00 a.m. on Friday of each b e
week shall also submit hourly schedules thereof (which shall promptly be confirmed in writing) for'the following week, which hourly schedules may be changed by KCPL at any time prior to 10:00
+
a.m. preceding the day a new delivery schedule is to be effective. Changes shall promptly be confirmed by RCPL in writing if requested by KGE provided that KGE shall not be obligated to deliver to KCPL during any month Interchange Energy in excess of the amount of energy made available to EDE to KGE during such month under Service Schedule K to their Interconnection Contract. KGE shall have the right to cancel, curtail or interrupt any scheduled delivery of Interchange Capacity and Interchange Energy to be received hereunder by KCPL from KGE when due to an Uncontrollable Force on KGE's or EDE's systems as defined in Article V of the Interchange Agreement to which this Service Schedule F is attached. Section 3. Rates and. Charges Capacity: KGE agrees to make available, and KCPL agrees to take and pay for Interchange Capacity in the amount of 25,000 kilowatts at a monthly rate equal to cost of Interchange Capacity to KGE plus 576 per kilowatt. As used herein, the term ' Cost of Interchange', Capacity' shall mean the monthly obligation incurred by KGE for capacity ~ purchased or' made available from EDE under Service Schedule K to the Interconnection Contract. Energy: KCPL agrees to pay for Interchange Energy delivered by KGE at a rate equal to KGE's cos t of Interchange '
Energy plus the higher of 10% thereof or the applica-tion of the following formula: (A x B) (C x 1.05) = D Where: A = Kwh of Interchange Energy purchased from EDE under Service Schedule K to the. Inter-connection Contract. B = Percent of KGE's 138 kv transmission losses. C = KGE system average generation cost from the last preceding month. 1.05 = 5% for dispatching, bookkeeping and margin. D = Add to Cost of Interchange Energy. As used herein, the term ' Cost of Interchange Energy' shall mean the cost per kwh to KGE for energy purchased or made available from EDE under Service Schedule K to the Intercon-nection Contract. Section 4. Term This Service Schedule F shall become effective as of the date of execution hereof and shall continue in full force and effect until superseded by a substitute Service Schedule F filed by KGE and made ef fective by the governmental regulatory agencies having juris-diction, provided, however, that this Service Schedule shall terminate on May 31, 1980, or earlier upon and concurrently with termination of
-any one or more of the following:
(a) Service Schedule K to that certain Interconnection Contract between KGE and EDE dated November 6, 1958. e c _3
. .- \
(b) Schedule E-MPA to that certain Municipal Participation Agreement dated July 8, 1964, between KCPL and the Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas. Nothing contained herein shall 'be construed as affecting in any way the right of the party furnishing service under'this Service Schedule - to unilaterally make application to the Federal Power Commission for a change in rates, charges, classficiation, or service, or any rule, regulation, or contract relating thereto, under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act and pursuant to the Commission's Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder. KANSAS GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY By~ 9te- N < 4 .t' Vice President ATTEST:
\ ~
ll.' Secretary KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGilT COMPANY By D . -[ Q ice Prdsident ATTEST: g
)
L' '
' Secretary e
r * *W * " ' '"
CONFORMED COPY KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY GLENN L. nottt t a CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE This is to certify that Kansas Gas and Electric Company assents to and concurs in the Service Schedule described below which Kansas City Power & Light Company has filed, and hereby files this cer-tificate of Concurrence in lieu of the filing of the 3ervice Schedule specified. Service Schedule F dated July 1, 1977, between Kansas City Power & Light Company and Kansas Gas and Electric Company for Interchange Service for the period July 1, 1977, with temination on May 31, 1980. KANSAS GAS AND ELEC RIC COMPANY By /s/ Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Operations Date August 19, 1977 201 N Market - Wichita, Kansas - Maul Mstess: P. O. Box : 38 ,' Wichita. Kansas 61201 - Teleph'one Area Code (31612641111, _ . _
Exhibit Bo4-33 l Mr. Win. Whitmer August 29, 1977 EDE Filing of Service Schedule K ,, a 4 Attached for your infortnation is a copy of The Erapire District Electric Conpany's filing of Service Schedule K with the Federal Power Comission. R GLK bb Attach cc: RPFiebach ' RFoster WBWalker
< REPhillips e
O e a
F; ._.
~ l:
i I TNE ESPitt DISTRICT ELECTRIC COBragy [i . * ' w
- le mu. . .... . . E """ W/ ,
August 24, 1977 7 ' [ " ..'.. .i
. -- I - y -.._ - , 7. -. .: _ .. l, ~.--.---g. *~- .-~ ......_t.,_- -- m ;-. , . .
Mr. Glenn Koester
,f .
Vice President, Operations - Kansas Gas and Electric Company -. !' P.O. Box 208 - Wichita, KS 67201 ._
Dear Mr. Koester:
'~ ' ~M ,
Enclosed for your files is a copy of the submittal to . the Federal' Power Commission concerning Service Schedule K for Peaking Power Service. Please let us know if you have any questions. - Yours very truly,
. f. 2:R V. E. Brill Assistant Sec etary ^
VEB:lj Enclosure t 4 ) e
, < , . . ,, ,-e ,.wm ,-r . . - . . . . . , , - - - . + . r. .- ., ,
9
*. o THE EMPIRE DISTRl[T ELECTRIC Co mPAl1V J0PLIN, H11$00RI 64605 August 24, 1977 Federal Power Commission 825 N. Capitol Street,-NE Washington, DC 20426 Attention:- Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary Centlemen:
In accordance with Rule 35 of the Regulations under the Federal Power Act, enclosed herewith for filing with the Commission are six copies of each of the following: (a) Service Schedule K, dated July 1, 1977, between The Empire , District Electric Company and Kansas Cas and Electric Company. Service Schedule K, Peaking Power Service, is proposed for' filing as a supplement to the AGREEMENT FOR INTERCllANGE OF POWER AND INTERCONNECTED OPERATION dated November 6,1958, and designated as Rate Schedule, F.P.C. No. 69.
-(b) A forecast of EDE peaking power sales to KGE under Service Schedule K for the twelve-month period ended June, 1978. - -(c) Certificate of Concurrence dated August 15, 1977, by Kansas Gas and Electric, Company.
(d) Schedules showing, basis for $0.25 per kw per month add-on
+ capacity charge.
Service Schcdule K provf des for the sale of 25 mw of peaking capacity and related energy from Empire to KGE for the period beginning July 1, 1977, and ending May 31, 1980. The capacity charge is cost plus $0.25 per kw per month. Related energy will be furnished at cost plus 10% with an allowance for incurred' losses. The scL0dule further provides that KGE will purchase no more than 30,000 thdi during any contract year,15,000 thdi during any four consecutive months, and , 5,000 Mwh in any one month. No less than 1,500 Mwh may be purchased in any one month. . The rates described ~1n the Service Schedule were determined through " arm's length" negotiation. They are based on the related costs of providing the service and are typical for this type of service in our area.
F,cdcral Power Commission August 24, 1977 The effective date of the Service Schedule is July 1, 1977. Therefore, Empire respectfully requests that the Commission waive the minidum 30-day filing requirement and make the schedule effective July 1, 1977. In accordance with Section 36.2 of the Regulations under the Federal Power Act, a check for $500 and a check for $100 are enclosed to cover the filing fee. A copy of this filing is being sent to Kansas Gas and Electric Company and ' to the Missouri Public Service Commission. Yours very truly, V. E. Brill Assistant Secretary . . VEB:lj , Enclosures cc: Kansas Gas and Electric Company . Missouri Public Service Commission 4 a 1
/
6 i o e
- SERVICC SC111mU1.E K Penhing Power Service i
This Service Schedule K is agreed to on July 1 , 1977, to be effective under, and as a part of, that certain Agreement for Interchr.nc,c of Power and. Interconnected Operation dated November 6, 1958, between The Empiru District Electric Company (EDE) and Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E)', Iure-inaf ter referred to as " Interchange Agreement". Section 1. - Peaking Pot:cr Service Peaking Power Service as used herein shall mean electric poucr and accompanying energy havini; the following characteristics:
- 1. Maximum one-hour demand --- 25,000 kilowatts for any anc all classes' of energy availabic during a1y I cur
- 2. Maximum Peaking energy usage --- ,
(a) 30,000,000 Kuh in one contract year June 1 - liay 31 (b) 15,000,000 Kuh in any four consecutive months (c) 5,000,000 Kuh in any one month
- 3. Minimum Peaking energy usage --- 1,500,000 Kuh in any one month ,
- 4. Additional energy may.at times, and from time to time, become availabic and will then be made avai,labic to KG&E.
Section 2. - Availability EDE agrees to make available to KCEE peaking power and energy as certain power and energy is available to EDE from its resources. EDE.shall have.the right tc, cance"., curtail, or interrupt any scheduled delivery of power and energy. to be received hereunder'hy KG6E fro.n PDE when due to an Uncontrollable Force, as , provided in Article VIII of the'.Interchanno A ireenent l to which this Service Schedule is attached, and including but not limited to the transmission system capability.
o .. Section ~l . - Sclu dolin3 l'y 2 P.11. on Thursday of each ecch, KCEC dispatcher ull t furnish to I;DS dispatcher a schedule for delivery of said peaking power on an hourly basis for each day of the next calendar veck. Daily schedules may bc changed at any tine prior to 1 P.II. of the day preceding the day a ..u delivery schedule is to bc . effective. Changes shall be promptly confirued by KC6r in uriting if requested by EDE. Section 4. - Payment for Service For Peaking Pouer Service made availabic hereunder, KCAE agrces to take and pay for each month in accordance with Section 1 herein above: Capacity: 25,000 kilowatts of contract demand, regardless of availabilit y, at a monthly rate equal to the EDE procuren'eut cost of like capacity plus an allowance of $0.25 per Ku per month. Energy: Accompanying energy scheduled and delivered at a monthly rate equal to (a) 1107. of EDE procurement cost of like energy, plus (b) an allouance to compensate EDE for losses incurred, computed as follows: , (1) 3*4 of energy delivered each month, tines t (2) EDE's average cost per kilouatt-hour of generating and/or purchasing the highest 157 increment of its " net energy for load" duri.ng the preceding month. " Net energy for load" is defined as System Met Generation, plus Energ,y 1:ece ipt s , mi.nus 1:nery,y Deliverieu , as reported' month!y on FPC form 12F,-2, or any successor forra of such Foro 12E-2. Section 5. - Provisioaa 1-:DI:'s per f orm mee under thic Service Schedule is nobject t o at.d run-Lingent upon t he terrm and condit ions set fort h in t hit Service Schedule be i n:;
approve d by tim Federal Pot er Conniision or such other co.. alt:sion at of her t eg-ulatory body or agency vhose approval or authorizat. ion ma) be required h> lav Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting in any way the right of the party furnishing service under this Service Schedule to unilaterally cake application to the Federal Powr Coamisr. ion for a change in rates, charges, classification, or service, or any rule, regulation, or contract relating thereto, under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act and pursuant to the Corraission's Rules and Regulations pro:aulgated thereunder, provided however that notice of any such application shall be given any other utility affected 30 days prior to filing uith , the FPC. Section 6. - Tera This Service Schedule K shall become effective on July 1,1977 or a.ch date that power becoa es availabic to EDE for delivery hereunder and shall certinua in full force and effect until nidnight May 31, 1980, unless earlier superseded by a substitute Service Schedule K filed by EDE and nade ef fective by any g.m.- crnmental regulatory agencies having jurisdictica, provided, however, that the parties shall nutually scck any necessary approvals of any said subs:itute Service Schedu7e K. At the opt ion of EDE this Service Schedule K shall terminate if at any time such peaking capacity should becene unavailable to EDC. Executed as of the date first hereinabove mentioned. , Tile EMPIRE D15'IRECT ELECTRIC COMPXG' Dy s.. (-.-('2.,
.. .t. //.l} -t . v .: . ,
ATICST: President
\ k, '4 Secretary KAUSAS CAS AMD I;l.0:Tl;IC CD:lPAN'i f . j/ -
ny f h.i ,e',':.'O'.$"i$.z.d.b.E. v ie er.. .i d.
- ope ra u..n=
Ni:C3T:
, . , <: Im/
~
e Forcenst of EDE Sales to KGi' Under Peaking Power Service Schedule K Capacity Energy
& Revenue Mwh Revenue Total Revenue 1977 July 25 $ 36,250 3,500 $10,010 $ 46,260)
August 25. 36,250 3,500 10,010 46,260 September 25- 36,250 3,000 8,580 44,830 October 25 36,250 1,500 4,290 40,540 . November 25 36,250 2,500 7,150 43,400 , , Dacember 25 36,250 3,000 8,580 44,830' 1978 January 25 36,250 3,000 8,580 44,830 February 25 36,250 2,500 7,150 43,400; t! arch 25 36,250 2,000 5,720 41,970 April 25 36,250 1,500 4,290 40,540 FL:y 25 36,250 1,500 4,290 40,540 June * , 36,250 2,500 7,150 43,400 .
$435,000 30,000 $85,800 $520,800 /
- Contract year is June 1 through the following 11ay 31. Ilowever, because service started one month late, on July 1, 1977, June 1978 estimate was included instead of June 1977 estimate. ,
e
. --. ' ' ~
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY G L L N N 4. u G L *, t C R v.ca e es.oe...c.a... . J CERTIFICATE OF CONCURPINCE This is to certify that Kansas Gas and Electric Company assents to end concurs in the Service Schedule described below which The Empiro District Electric Company has filed, and hereby filos this , Certificate of Concurrence in lieu of the filing of the Service Schedule specified.
- Scrvice Schedule K dated July 1,1977, between The Empire District Electric Company and Kansas Gas and Electric Company for Peaking Power Service for the period July 1, 1977 until midnight May 31, 1980.
1 KANSAS GAS AND I:IECTRIC. COMPANY By___ b.
"sl3 /: S t'L ' Vice President - Operations Date: August 15, 1977 ,
Fixed Charges as of December 31, 1976 Cost of Weighted
$ % of Money Value Fixed Charge Rate Amount Total 7, 7,
- 1. Cost of Money Debt - Long Term
~
46,420,000 46.5 6.20 2.88
- Notes 3,200,000 3.2 8.00 .26(
Preferred 11,902,000 11.9 6.31 .75 Common Equity 38,354,000 38.4~ 12.5 4.80 Total 99,876,000 8.69
- 2. Income Tax @ 507. 4.'35
- 3. Depreciation 3.10
- 4. Ad Valorem Taxes 2.45 ,
- 5. Insurance '.39 Total Fixed Charges - % 18.98 i Fixed Charges - 161 KV System $/KW
- 1. Transmission Plant in Service $5,937,637.28
- 2. Reserve for Depreciation 1,805,005.04-
- 3. Net Plant in Service 4,132,632.24 1
- 4. System Peak - KW (1976) 403,600 .
- 5. Net 161 KV Investment - $/KW 10.24
- 6. Fixed Charge Rate 18.98
- 7. Fixed Charges - $/KW-M0 $ .17
- 8. a. Transmission - 06M $ 508,906
- b. Net Transmission Plant in Service $16,438,975
- c. $ ONFt per $ Net Plant .031
- 9. '161-KV OSM per #8.c. above 128,112
- 10. 161 KV O&M - $/KW-PO .0}
- 11. . Total Fixed Chargos - $/KW-M0 .20
- 12. Replacement Capacity Cost - $/KW-MO 3% loss and $1.75/KW-M0 Capacity . 0:i
- 13. Total Cost -- $/Ku-Ho .25
Exhibit B.4-34 k m sin any.i.o INTEROFFICE CO R RESPON D E N C E to. Mr. Wm. Whitmer DATE: August 30, 1977 sussect. Service Schedule F for Interchange Service with Kansas City Power & Light Company You will recall that on August 19 we transmitted to Kansas City Power & Light Company two executed copies of Service Schedule F for filing with the Federal Power Consnission, together with 4 signed copies of our Certificate of Concur-rence and our check for $100.00 for the filing fee. Mr. Robert Sullivan, Manager-Rates and Contracts for KCPL, advises me that we should make the filing since we are the selling party; consequently, we are sending on to you the two executed copies of Service Schedule F, together with 5 signed copies of KCPL's Certificate of Concurrence and our f original check for $100.00. Please proceed to file this Schedule with the Federal Power Commission and see that a copy of the FPC filing is sent to Mr. Sullivan's attention. (([/ GLK:bb I Attach cc RPFiebach RFoster,w/cy* WBWalker/IDFile, w/ Orig.* REPhillips,w/cy*
- Certificate of concurrence AJDoyle, KCPL JRMiller, KCPL RBSullivan, KCPL i
*r
- Exhibit B.4-35
, KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE ELECYMC COMenANV p- September 7,1977 bc: Messrs. Fiebach/Cadman Koester I ' D. Eu ns Walker /Skeltoa / Shank Mr. Kenneth F. ,PTumb, Secretary Macklin/Pinkstaff Federal Powe Commission Phillips Washingto D.C. 20426 Important Document File Service Schedule F Interchange Service ; dated July 1, 1977 supplements the OF . Interchange Agreement between Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E) and Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCP&L) dated March 27, 1963 and designated FPC rate schedule No. 99
Dear Mr. Plumb:
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, we submit the following pursuant to: , Part 35, Sec. 35.13, Filing of Changes in Rate Schedules Par. (a): g (1) Enclosed are five copies of this letter and six copies of Service Schedule F including Title Page and Certificate of Concurrence from Kansas City Power & Light Company.
. (2) The effective date of this schedule is July 1,1977.
Therefore both parties respectfully ask that the Commission waive the minimum 30-day filing requirement and approve a July 1, 1977 effective date. (3) Copies of the filing have been furnished to Kansas City Power & Light Company and the State Corporation Commission of Kansas. (4) Service Schedule F provides electric power and accompanying energy to be supplied during the term of the contract to Kansas City Power & Light Company as it is made available to Kansas Gas and Electric Company by The Empire District Electric Company (EDE) under Service Schedule K to that Agreement for Interchange of Power and Interconnected operation. (5) Kansas Gas and Electric Company desires to sell to Kansas ' City Power & Light Company this Interchange Service purchased from The Empire District Electric' Company which Kansas City Power & Light Company will in turn sell to The Board o'f Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas. b 201 N. Market - Wichita, Kansas - Mail Address: P. O. Box 208 / Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Area Code (316) 26KillI
Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb
@ Page Two September 7,1977 .
(6) The schedule has been properly executed by both parties. Par.(b): (1) All billing comparison for the twelve months ended June 1978 is attached. (2) Cost support calculations for the 574 per KW.added to the capacity charge is attached. Also attarned is a form of notice for publicatic.. in the Federal Register and a check for $100 to cover the filing fee. Please advise us when a supplement number is assigned to tisis service schedule. Very truT)' yo s, j . Bill Whitmer Manager of Rates f BW:ck Enclosures cc: R B Sullivan, KCP&L n .
-- .y. --- , . ,m , m ..,-- , - ,-, = ,, ,-- - .- t "
Filing Date: ' Ssptembrr 7, 1977
, Effectiva Date: July 1, 1977 Commission Letter: Octobsr 18, 1977 4
Supplement No. 4 to Rate Schedule FPC No. 99 h: TITLE PAGE FILED BY: Kansas Gas and Electric Company Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
~
SERVIC'E T0: Kansas City Power & Light Company DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE: Service Schedule F, Interchange Service provides for Kansas Gas and Electric Company-to supply 25,000 KW of power and accompanying energy to Kansas City Power & Light who will in turn resell it to The Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas. Kansas Gas and Electric Company is receiving the 25,000 KW from The Empire District Electric Company. O f 1 1 4
,,...y,.,,, - ._-, , , _ - _, .__.,_-.y. ,, ,,,,,.,.m._ . ,.,..,m., -
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
-A' / - aso saumonc avce.uc KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64141 CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE ~
This is to' certify that Kansas City Power & Light Company assents to and concurs in the rate schedule supplement, described below, which Kansas Gas and Electric Company has filed, and hereby files this Cer-tificate of Concurren:e in lieu of the filing of the rate schedule supplement specified. SERVICE SCllEDULE F for INIERCHANGE SERVICE under Interchange Agreement dated March 27, 1963 between Kansas City Power & Light Company and Kansas Cas and Electric Company (Kansas City Power & Light Company Rate Schedule FPC No. 34) MNSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY By
. Robert B. Sullivan, Manager-Rates & Contracts Dated: Aug. 22 , 1977 O - - - . _ . . , , .r... _. _ -
_m. , , , _ . _ - . _ . _ _ _ . . . _ , . , _ , _ . . _ . ~ _ , , , ._..7, ,,., _ y,-. -. _
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
,(7) . FORECAST OF SALES UNDER. SERVICE SCHEDULE F Capacity Energy Month MKW Revenue MKWH Revenue Total Jul 1977 25 $ 50,500 3,500 $ 11,074 $ 61,574 Aug 25 50,500 3,500 11,071 61,571 Sep 25 50,500 3',000 9,489 59,989 ; . Oct . 25 50,500 1,500 4,745 55,245 Nov 25 50,500 2,500 7,907 58,407 Dec 25 50,500 3,000 9,489 59,989 Jan 1978 25 50,500 3,000 9,489 59,989 Feb 25 50,500 2,500 7,907 58,407 Mar 25 50,500 2,000 6,326 56,826 Apr 25 50,500 '1,500 4,745- 55,245 May 25 50,500 1,500. 4,745 55,245 June 25 50,500 2,500 7,907_ 58,407 Total $606,000 30,000 $94,894 $700,894 0 Billing cost per The Empire District Electric Company: .
385,800 x 1.10% per fornula = $94,380 or (A x B) (C x 1.05) = D (30,000 HKwh x 2.33%) (12.39 mills x 1.05%) = 0 (699,000 Kwh) (13.01 mills) = 0 D = $9,094
$85,800 + 9,094 = $94,894 Using the higher of the two, the energy charge is $94,894.
p .-
~
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY RATES AND CHARGES CALCULATION Capacity: 574 per.KW adder Investment At 12/31/76 Amount Notes
- 1. 345 KV transmission lines $22,234,151 2 161 KV transm,ission lines 2,295,387 3 138 KV transmission lines 13,405,283 4 Station equipment 17,872,232 5 Total 55,807,053 6 Reserve 11,049,796 (a) 7 Net investment 144,757,257 Cost 8 Fixed costs 19.62% (b) 9 Operating and maintenance expense 0.80 (c) 10 A & G expense 0.64 (d) 11 Total 21.06%
12 1976 peak hour 1.387,000 KW 13 Cost per KW (7+12) $32.27 14 Annual cost (11x13) 6.80 15 Monthly cost 574 The energy charge is basically a modification of the rate charged-by The Empire District Electric Company. The markup represents.the
-recovery of incrementa' operatino costs, accounting and bookeeping expenses atid transmiss' on and tr5nsformer losses.
e p .
l . . . l
;(74 ' NOTES:
(a) Transmission plant reserve $18,364,729 , j 9.8% Transmission plant in service $92,905,603 (b) Capital structure Amount Ratio Cost Total Long term debt $264,445,112 51.62% 7.12% 3.68% Preferred stock 83,701,100 16.34 7.85 1.28 Common equity 164,176,569 32.04 13.36 4.28 4 Total- $512,322,781 100.00% 9.24%
~
Fixed Costs Long term debt 3.68% Preferred stock 1.28 Common equity 4.28 Income taxes 5.91 Taxes other than income 1.66 Depreciation 2.81 Total 19767'% (c) Operating and maintenance expense Costs per page 442 1976 FPC Form 1 345 KV transmission lines $ 23,164 161 KV transmission lines 5,975 138 KV transmission lines 40,502 (7h' Stationequipment(est.) 290,222 Total ~
$359,863 Percent of net investment u.uus (d) Administrative and general expense A & G expense applicable to transmission $ 611,994 Net transmission expense 95,911,046 Percent 0.64%
i l i l . k t*%
F UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION
- b. Kansas Gas and Electric Company ) Docket No. ,
NOTICE OF CHANGES IN TARIFF Take notice that Kansas Gas and Electric Company on September 7, 1977 tendered for filing proposed changes in its Federal Power Commission Electric Service Tariff No. 99. Kansas Gas and Electric Company states that the filing is Service Schedule Interchange Service which provides electric power and accompanying energy to be supplied July 1,1977 through May 31, 1980.to Kansas City Power & Light Company as Kansas Gas and Electric Company will purchase this power and accompanying energy from The Empire District Electric Company. Copies of the filing were served upon Kansas City Power & Light Company and the Utilities Division of the State Corporation Commission. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said application should file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Power Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D. C. 20426, in accordance with paragraph 1.8 and 1.10 of the Comission's Rules and Practice of Procedure (18 CFR i .8,1.10) . Such petitions or protests should be filed on or before
. Protests will be considered by the Commission in b determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspe.ction.
SERVICE SCIIEDULE F INTERCilANGE SERVICE O This SERVICE SCHEDULE F is agreed to on July 1, 1977, to be , j
~
effective hereunder, and as part of, that certain Interchange Agree-ment dated March 27, 1963, betwecn Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KGE) and Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCPL), as supplemented by Supplementary Agreement No. 1 thereto dated June 11, 1965, herein referred to'as " Interchange Agreement". Section 1. Interchange Service Interchange Service as used herein shall mean 25,000 kilowatts of electric power (Interchange capacity) and accompanying energy (Interchange Energy) to be made available by KGE to KCPL subject to availability and based on the amounts of power and accompanying energy made available to KGE by The Empire District Electric Company (EDE) under Service Schedule K to that certain Agreement for Interchange of Power and Interconnected Operation dated November 6, 1958, herein referred to a's " Interconnection Contract". Section 2. Scheduling and Conditions KCPL, through its dispatcher, will submit to the KGE' dispatcher on or before the fifteenth (15th) day of each month or the last business day preceding the 15th day of each month if the'15th day is a non-business day, an estimate of the total numb'er of kilowatt-hours of Interchange' Energy to be requested from KGE for delivery l and sale to KCPL during the following month (which KCPL shall promptly confirm in writing), and on or before 10:00 a.m. on Friday of each
week shall also submit hourly schedules thereof (which shall promptly be confirmed in writing) for the following week, which grw hourly schedules-may be changed by KCPL at any time prior to 10:00
%) -
a.m. preceding the day a new delivery schedule is to be effectivo. Changes shall promptly be confirmed by KCPL in writing if reqtiested by KGE provided that KGE shall not be obligated'to deliver to KCPL during any month Interchange Energy in excess of the amount of energy made available to EDE to KGE during such month under Service Schedule K to their Interconnection Contract. KGE shall have the right to cancel, curtail or interrupt any scheduled delivery of Interchange Capccity and Interchange Energy to be received hereunder by KCPL from KGE when due to an Uncontrollable Force on KGE's or EDE's systems as , defined in Article V of the Interchange Agreement to which this Service Schedule F is attached. Section 3. Rates and Charnes O Capacity: KGE agrees to make available, and KCPL agrees to take and pay for Interchange capacity in the amount of 25,000 kilowatts at a monthly rate equal to cost of Interchange Capacity to KGE plus 576 per kilowatt. As used herein, the term ' Cost of Interchange Capacity' shall mean the monthly obligation incurred by KGE for capacity purchased or made available from EDE under Service Schedule K to the Interconnection Contract. Energy: KCPL agrees to pay for Interchange Energy delivered by KGE at a rate equal to KGE's cost of Interchange 1
- 1. , .,
- Energy plus the higher of 10% thereof or the applicm-tion of the following formula:
(A x B) (C x 1.05) = D Where: . A = Kwh of Interchange Energy purchased from EDE under Service Schedule K to the Inter-connection' Contract. B = Percent of KGE's 138 kv transmission losses. C = KGE system average generation cost from the last preceding month. 1.05 = 5% for dispatching, bookkeeping and margin. D = Add to Cost of Interchange Energy. As used herein, the term ' Cost of Interchange Energy' shall mean the cost per kwh to KGE for energy purchased or made available from EDE under Service Schedule K to the Intercon-
~
(*g nection Contract. Section 4. Term 4 This Service Schedule F shall become effective as of the date of execution hereof and shall-continue in full force and effect ,
- until superseded by a substitute Service Schedule F filed by KGE and I made effective by the governmental regulatory agencies having juris-diction, provided, however, that this Service Schedule shall terminate on May 31, 1980, or earlier upon and concurrently with termination of any one or more of the following
-(a) Service Schedule K to that certain Interconnection l
Contract between KGE and EDE dated November 6, 1958. i
. -- - . . -- . ~ . . . __ - . . - .- - - . . . - . . . ._
. ~.
(b) S;hedule E-MPA to that certain Municipal Participation Agreement dated July 8, 1964, between KCPL and the Board Q of Pub'lic Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting in any way the right of the party furnishing service under this Service Schedule to unilaterally make application to the Federal Power Commission for a change in rates, charges, classficiation, or service, or any rule, regulation., or contract relating thereto, under Section 205 of the Federal Power Act and pursuant to the Commission's Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder. KANSAS GAS and ELECTRIC COMPANY By , $f%/,
- 04 Vice President ATTEST:
V" tvk' p Secretary KANSAS CITY POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY By ~A b k V Vice Pr esident Sderetary 4 4
I.:l' i at ilNITED STATES ' OF N1 ERICA 'f'e ( FEDERAL POWER CO'IMISSION Kansas Gas and Electric ) Docket No. ER77-581 &# Company ) NOTICE OF CHANGES IN TARIFF (September 19,- 1977) ,. e., ..
. . .V Take notice that Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E) on September 9, 1977 tendered for filing proposed changes in its Federal Power Commission Electric Service Tariff No. 99.
KG&E states that the filing is an Interchange Service Schedule which provides electric power and-accompanying energy to be supplied July 1, 1977 through May 31, 1980 to Kansas City Power & Light Con.pany. KG&E indicates that it will pur- . chase this power and accompanying energy from the Empire District Electric Company. According to KG&E, copies of the filing were served upon Kansas City Power & Light Company and the Utilities Division of the State Corporation Commission. Any person desiring to be heard or.to protest said appli-cation should file a petition to intervene or protestN.E., with Wash-the ' Federal Power Commission, 825 North Capitol Street,
- ing ton , D. C. 20426, in accordance with S1.8 and 1.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 1.8, 1.10). .
All such petitions or protests should be filed on or before . September 26, 1977. Protests will be considered by the Commis-sion in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will , not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any - i person wishing to become a party must file a petition to inter-vene. Copies of this application are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. Lois D. Cashell Acting Secretary DC-A-32 .e &#,' se
* * ,j\ l t d
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Kd i Exhibit B.4-36 WASHINGTON. D.C. 20426 IN REPL.Y REFER TO: PWR-RC Docket No. ER77-571 SEP 261977 ')hI' Empire District Electric Company Attention: V. E. Brill Assistant Secretary
. Joplin, }iissouri 64801 Re: Your submittal by letter dated. August 24, 1977, of supplement service Schedule K dated July 1, 1977, to the Interconnection Agreement dated . . ,9 November 6, 1958, between your company and Kansas Gas and Electric ~
Company. M'i Gentlemen: . The above filing submitted by your company does not comply with Section 35.8 of the Commission's Regulations under the Federal Power Act in that it does not contain a form of notice suitable for publication in the Federal Register in the form prescribed by that section. Please ' submit an appropriate form of notice. YA*
.T The proposed rate you have filed for Peaking Power Service includes w
a monthly energy charge of 110% of your procurement costs of like energy plus a 3% loss factor. Please explain the components of the additional 10% charge and why it is not sufficient to cover losses. Pending receipt of such form of notice and explanation of energy t charges, a Illing date will not be assigned to your submittal. u 6-Very truly yours, i j .e Secretary i cc: Kansas Gas & Electric Company ' 3, y,, j P. O. Box 208 S emns r>i n Wichita, Kansas 67201 5 nJr.tnau ;o ni b % t: EP' 291Fi ,
,ylL. ..- 4
- 1-
- A.; -
t.
- I 1:
' Q. i. ' f f ' :'t _
O h: .... . .: . _ . V w
~
- p. D b _
.m .ui n i $ $gj,*[#;y4%.,.41.'., <
i
kg Exhibit B.4-37 '[W* O FEDER AL ENERGY REGULA10RY COMMISSION ' 3 KCEIVEU % msu,uorou. O. C. ,ou.
59w. R. WHUMER Q g6' . Docket No. ER77-581
'"y ' Kansas Gas & Electric Company (f Attentions Mr. Bill Whitmer Manager of Rates P. O. Box 208 O]' 1 $ })7[
Wi-hita, Kansac 67201 Re Your letter dated September 7, 1977, submitting for filing Service Schedule F, Interchange Service, to your Interchange y;.,
, Agreement with Kansas City Power & Light Company. ye Gentlemen On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 93-91, 91 Stat.'565 (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist ,
and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy, h.h was activated on October 1, 1977. The " savings provisions" of Section 705(b) of the DOE Act provide p that proceedings pending before the FPC on the date the DOE Act takes effect shall not be affected and that orders shall be issued in such proceedings as if the DOE Act'had not been enacted. All such proceedings shall be coe inued and further actions shall be taken by the appropriate .. component -I LJE now, responsible for the function under the DOE Act and @"' *. regulations promulgated thereunder. The functions which are the subject of these proceedings were specifically transferred to the FERC by , , , , , Section 402(a) (1) of the DOE Act. r.' The joint regulation adopted on October 1, 1977, by the Secretary and the FERC entitled " Transfer of Proceedings to the Secretary of I ". J. Energy and the FERC," 10 CFR , provided that this proceeding would . be continued before the FERC. The FERC takes action in this proceeding in accordance with the above mentioned authorities. The above rate filing submitted by your company has been designated .. as follows: . Kansas Gas & Electric Company Supplement No. 4 to . Rate Schedule FPC No. 99 G.;:' 4 . 1% %y f 89 % gr~.. & i..'.}.W. W .rc.7:":..~
o .
, f ,
Kansas Gas & Electric Company p Since the filing of the Interchange Service rates charged by the g.: :.c 4 Empire District Electric Company in Docket No. ER77-571 is presently deficient with respect to
- be requirements of the Commission's Regulations, that portion of the rates to Kansas City Power and Light Company which reflect a passthrough of those rates are subject to the outcome of Commission action in that docket, and this acceptance for filing is without prejudice to any findings or orders which may here-after be made by the Commission in Docket No. ER77-571.
V
, Notice of the filing was issued on September 19, 1977, with ecafi comments, protests, or petitions to intervene due on or before September 26, 1977. No comments, protests, or interventions have been filed.
With reference to your request for waiver of the noti e r'equire- . ments, the Commission has found that good cause has been shown for such action pursuant to the requirements of Section.205(d) of the Federal Power Act and Section 35.11 of the Commission's Regulations thereunder and has provided that the rate schedule shall become effective July 1, 1977. y' This acceptance for filing does not constitute approval of any service, rate, charge, classification, or any rule, regulation, con-tract, or practice affecting such rate or service provided for in the above-designated rate schedules nor shall such acceptance be deemed as recognition of any claimed contractual right ot obligation affecting or relating to such service or rates and such acceptance is ,. , without prejudice tg any findings or orders which have been or may gy hereafter be c- e by.the Commission in any proceeding now pending or hereaf ter instituted by or against your company. ,,
-,s This acceptance for filing terminates Docket No. ER77-581. ), ' .
By direction of the Commission. ,Tt'. kW ~ Secr. ary cc Kansas City Power & Light Company
- DISTRIBUTION Fiebach/Cadman Koester D Evans I#
Wa'1ker/Skelton Phillips
.Q Qbl. $cyc '.p& c; ..~.>. : ; & ?.;::- ..
- Exhibit B.4-38 945678 g FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Y WASHINGTON, D.C. U" uu()
20426 h,. Q e :: Docket No. ER80-357 ,g NQggtt$ Kansas City Power and Light Company Attentio": Mr. L. C. Rasmussen Vice President Corporate dhN b 980 Planning and Finance 1330 Baltimore Avenue P. O. Box 679
. Kansas City, Missouri 64141
Dear Mr. Rasmussen:
By letter dated April 25, 1980, you submitted for filing a proposed, Transmission Service Schedule (designated by your company as'E-MPA-2) under your Municipal Participation Agreement with the Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kansas, superseding your present Transmission Service Schedule (E-MPA-1) under that Agreement. Your submittal is deficient with respect to the requirements of Section 35.1 of Commission Regulations in that you have not furnished "all contracts which in any manner affect or relate" to ("% your submittal. The proposed superseding Schedule E-MPA-2 changes all refer-ences to Kansas Gas & Electric Company (KG&E) in the present Schedule E-MPA-1 to references to The Empire District Electzic Company (EDE) in the superseding Schedule E-MPA-2. Sche / ale E-MPA-1 provides specifically that "this Schedule E-MPA shall terminate on May 31, 1980, or earlier upon and concurrently with termination of Service Schedule F to that certain Interchange Agreement dated March 27, 1963, between the Company and KG&E..." l Additionally, superseding Schedule E-MPA-2 changes all refer-ences to the above mentioned Service Schedule F, to a propo.ed Service Schedule H, to be filed by EDE under your Interchange Agreement, dated December 17, 1979, with that Company. In order to complete your filing, it is necessary that you submit, or have the parties named above submit, respectively:
/
(1) a Notice of Termination of the aforementioned Service Schedule F under your Interchange Agreement with KG&E; and (2) the aformentioned Service Schedule H under your Inter-ggg change Agreement with EDE. l
b,4 Kansas City Power & Light Company
-Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please submit seven Six copies copies of your response to this deficiency letter.
should be sent to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary 825 North Capitol Street, N. E.
. Washington, D. C. 20426 The seventh copy should be sent to:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Attention: Mr. Jerry R. Milbourn Acting Chief, Branch of Electric Rate Filings 825 North Capitol Street, N. E., Room 5308 Washington, D. C. 20426 If there are questions'concerning the requests contained in this letter, please contact Mr. William A. Bruns of the Commission's [*h staff., His telephone number is (202) 376-9321. Pending receipt of the above information, a filing date will not be assigned to your submittal. Sinc rely, A f--{,,jge.N/W s (WilliamW. Lindsay, Director Office of Electric Power Regulation cc: The Empire District Electric Company Kansas Gas & Electric Company Board of Public Utilities of Ka'.asas City Kansas O e 4 ge
Exhibit B.4-39 KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 1330 BALTIMORE AvtNUE P. O. 80X 679 g)$f3 KANSAS CITY. MISSOURI 64141 g4*' k ' nosent s. aut.UVAN jur , . .) A i
$, " , ,. p ., * * ....m....-. e g g T,11 Ep SEg A u June 16, 1980 3 g Mr. Bill Whitmer Kansas Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
Dear Bill:
Enclosed are six copies of a Certificate of Concurrence from KCPL in the Notice of Termination of Service Schedule F under Interchange Agreement dated March 27, 1963, between KCPL and KG&E, Very truly yours., f RBS-BR/kd enc 1. e .
- O O ,
O . CERTIFICATE OF CONdURRENCE This is to certify that Kansas City Power & Light Company ("KCPL") assents to and concurs in the Notice of Termination of the rate schedule supplement described below which Kansas Gas and Electric Company ("KG&E") has filed, and hereby files this Certificate of Concurrence in lieu of the filing of the Notice of Termination of the rate schedule supplement specified. Service Schedule F, Interchenge Service, under
- Interchange Agreement dated riarch 27, 1963, be-tween KCPL and KG&E, undesignated Supplement to KCPL's FPC Rate Schedule No. 34, to be terminated May 31, 1980.
b KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY By $ ' Robert B Sullivan Manager, Rates and Regulation 4 Dated: S , 1980. I \ . I - l l D . 4
b UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Kansas Gas and Electric Company) NOTICE OF CANCELLATION The filing Compauy submits the following: Take notice that Kansas Gas and Electric Company on tendered for. filing a Notice of Cancellation of Service Schedule F dated July 1, 1977, Supplement to Rate Schedule FERC No. 99 between Kansas Gas and Electric Company and Kansas City Power & Light Company. KG&E indicates' that this cancellation is to be effective as of May 31, 1980. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said application should [*h file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 1.8 and 1.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 1.8, 1.10). All such petitions or protests should be filed on or before . Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file petition to . intervene. Copies of this application are filed with the Commission and are available for public inspection. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary
- , - -, r, ,-- - , - -m-,-_,, ,,g, , - - , --
., / ,. ' Exhibit B.4-40
- KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- n cr ecm .,
4 June 18, 1980 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Attention: Mr. Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary 825 North Capitol Sreet, N. E. Room 9310 Washington, D. C. 20426 Ret Rate schedule FERC No. 99
Dear Mr. Plumb:
(*$ Pursuant to the Commission's regulations under the Federal Power . Act and in response to the Letter of Deficiency to Kansas City Power & Light Company dated June 3, 1980 in_ Docket No. ER80-357, en-closed for filing with the Commission are six (6) copies each of the following:
- 1. Notice of Cancellation of Service Schedule F dated July 1, 1977, between Kansas Gas and Electric Company and Kansas City Power &
Light Company.
- 2. A Certificate of Concurrence signed by Kansas City Power & Light Company.
- 3. A Form of Notice suitable for publication in the Federal Register to comply with Section 35.8 of the regulations.
i Applicant's check in the amount of $100.00 is also enclosed to cover the cost of filing this notice. l Copies of this filing bive been sent to: l gg Kansas ity Power & Light Cor.pany Attention: Mr. L. C. Rasmussen Vice President Corporate Planning and Finance l 1330 Baltimore Avenue l P. O. Box 679 Kansas City, Missouri 64141 QM1 - TcM Area Code G316) 2616611
Mr. Ksnn2th F. Plumb June 18, 1980 Q Page Two and Federal Energy Regulatory Conunission Attention: Mr. Jerry L. Milbourn Acting Chief . Branch of Electric Rate Filings 825 N. Capitol Street, N. E. Room 5308 Washington, D. C. 20426 Very truly ours, t Manager of Rates b wRwi r. Enclosure i l
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION Notice is hereby given that effective the 31st day of May,1980, Service Schedule F, supplement to Rate Schedule FERC No. 99, effective date . July 1,1977, and filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Connaission by Kansas Gas and Electric Company, will expire on its own terms on May 31, 1980, and should be considered as cancelled. Notice of the proposed cancellation has been served upon the following: b KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
. Y AA %.~ R. Whitmer Manager of Rates June 18, 1980 4
l
..- - - Exhibit B.4-4
,. . 91STRIBUT10N: gio @gy Fiebzch/ Cad::en FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSloN JUL 1980 d WASHINGTON 2042. ECbvtu $ . h D. Evans Walker /Skelton
, Docket No. ER80-352 Y9.E WM )
Phillips D ! Important Document File SSdra Empire District Electric Company 1o30 Attention: Mr. V. E. Brill Assistant Secretary Assistant Treasurer Joplin, Missouri 64801
Dear Mr. Brill:
By letter dated April 21, 1980, you subm!.tted for filing with the Commission a Notice of Cancellt. tion of Service Schedule K to your Agreement for Interc'nange of Power and Interconnected Operation with Kansa- Gas and Electric Company. Your submittal is accepted for filing and desig-nated as follows: Empire District Electric Company Supplement No. I to
, Supplement No. 15 to Rate Schedule FPC No. 69 (Cancels Supplement No. 15)
Kansas Gas & Electric Company Supplement No. I to supplement No. 19 to Rate Schedule FPC No. 83 (Cancels supplement No. 19) Notice of the filing was issued on May 2, 1980, with com-ments, protests, or petitions to intervene due on or before May 23, 1980. No comments, protests, or interventions were filed. Good cause is shown for granting waiver of the notice require-ments pursuant to Section 205(d) of the Federal Power Act and Section 35.11 of the Commission's Regulations thereunder; there-fore, the rate schedule shall become effective May 31, 1980. This acceptance for filing does not consitute recognition of any claimed contractual right of obligation associated with the above rate schedule or its cancellation and such acceptance is ("I
- ,- , , --n-wrr. - , .-- --ww ,. + -- ---e- w-,-n -,ae, -
5 - e O Empire District Electric Company without prejudice to any findings or orders which have been or may hereafter be made by the commission in any proceeding now pending or hereafter instituted by or against your company. This acceptance for filing terminates Docket No. ER80-352. j* Sin grply, ,}s' f , p ,{;. w . J William W. Linds , Director office of Electric Power Regulation cc: Kansas Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 4 O
. -~.. . . . --
t
- 1 NOTICE OF CANCELLATIO_N_
t- Notice is h'ereby given that effective the 31st day of May, 1980, ; Service Schedule K, supp'lement to Rate Schedule FERC No. 69, effective date July 1, 1977, and filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Cocunission by The Empire Distr'ict Electric Company, will expire on its own terms on May 31,.1980, and should be considered as cancelled. Notice of the proposed cancellation has been served upon the
~
following: i KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE EMPIRE DISTRICT. ELECTRIC COMPANY
' -A J.fA. Reed Vice President - T & D Operations i
h -
, . - . , e-, --e r - , w,-- ,m-,,3-,w--, - ,- , , .e~*-. .-,w--- + == r --&- -- ---
.q.
a o-UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
.' FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION The Empire District )
Electric Company ) A h I- NOTICE OF CANCELLATION The filing Company submits the following: Take notice that The Empirs 91 strict Elect ic Company on , tendered for filing a Notice of Cancellation of Service Schedule K dated July 1,1977, Supplement to Rate -Schedule FERC No. 69 between The Empire, District Electric Company and the Kansas Gas and Electric Company. EDE indicates that this cancellation-is to be effective as of May 31, 1980. Any person desiring to be he'ard or to protest said application should . file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 20426, in Comission, 825 North Capitol Street, N.E., Washingtt'n, D.C.
--b accordance with Sections 1.8 and 1.10 of the Comission's Rules of Practice All such petitions or protests should be and Procedure (18 CFR 1.8, 1.10).
Protests will be considered by filed on or before . ' the Comission in determining the appropriate action- to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to'the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file petition to intervene. Copics:of this application are filed with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
? ?
Kenneth F. Plumb, Secretary
-- (
s j x
, , _ r . - - - - - - - - , , ---,--r, 1- s
_.-__._)
. - Bs5-1 * =
CHAPIN & PENNY, ATTORNEYS P. o. son see
) f MEDICINE LODGE, KANSAS ZsP Coos e7104 W. LUus CnAPtN GomeoM M.Penry , sfsoecins Locos. mane As . cnArew musLoews see s. MAN.AS November 20, 1975 v. u ..... .
ElowA. KANS AS orrect sios.
,.c .. ... - ..s . . \ r .,.
Kansas Gas & Electric Company 's KG & E Bldg., ,- Wichita, Kansas ,
' , I.' ,
( g)L ' . Gentlemen:
/
I represent the City of Kiowa, Kansas. The City has made arrangements to purchase the electric distribu-tion system serving the city. It has been suggested l that we should contact your company to see if you would be interested in supplying electric power to the city. h I would very much oppreciate your letting me know if you would be interested, and also furnishing me with your rate for wholesale service to municipalities. Very tru,11 yours,
,/
N f-Gordon Penny - GP:jmc cc: Ed We.tz ' ' Kiowa, Kansas 67070 1 l l I l l . l { - 1 l h . n,., l l
0 _. Is.5-2 November 21,1975 , F* r Mr Gordon Penny, Attorney Chapin A Penny P 0 Box 148 lledicine Lodge, Kansas 67104
Dear Mr Penny:
Thank you for your letter November 2 ,1975 inquiring as .
.o our interest in supplying wholesale electric power to the City of Kg.
Kansas Gas and Electric Company does not have a Certificate . of Convenience and Hecessity to serve that area and, con-sequently, has no transmission facilities available. ,
.D Sincerely, .
2 . WXC/vr bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach G L Koester - W K Woolery R E Phillips Chuck Edwards s I L_ _ _ _-
.. e 'r* * }' .-l\ l= [ / *\
- l ) ' ' fi.6-1 ' ' lV
' ctN. t. contA.
1 1ir i l I
. ris, bi ra r.' ri . .no l - ,, p -
mar.ui 703 5th Street g. ' ( !'l)$[p!!,19,7.U James D. Stephens OSWEGO, K ANSAS 67356 g. ga / ,q Mayor . 316-795-4433 4 ,gii , L uy,y,n ,. _ _ 4 y\f e tl .,.Q ', _. $N{ ..*" a .:.. ,4 v..
) ,;s{' gv' ---~
(3t' , t. y,0 . RUFUS M. MONROE e % _ ,t: .. : , . City Clerk [' , h,,t ' * ,J .-- September 14, 1978 , y,Y ' ..' / ;[ag9 f -
,. (, .I f y ,, I N .g fg;p 't.u o .' :
- Q NADINE HERRIDGE f 6[ 6) f)Y,s .'sf )2!R?.".:a
/ E;- __ &mh . _ !) , l City Treasurer The Electric Company 'g k *'I Ji\ .h 1 -",7'E* ), I./' '.{/ b - s Mr. Lennis Evans ,,,4 j'gf J g),,y;) t j ,._
r.g.-g N-Box 208 4 h 1 . . , Wichita, Kansas 67201 J(h[I/ 8%y' 0, s L p $ [.. g ._~ -- k @ ., ,.r,/- hC,' gs6 JOHN F. AMOS
Dear Sir:
[, A ,t J.: Q( 0 (' d 4-- t City Attorney ThecityofOswegoownsitsdistribut[onsyst and purchases power from Kansas Power & Light Y -5[D fp 'bh Company deldve. red by Kansas Gas & Electric Compang t
','y JOHN D. SHERwooo from their loop six miles north of Oswego. '
g Municipal Judge d As the city finds that it cannot compete with the major power companys in the area on rates, the city council decided to explore the idea of selling g the system to a power company. O q. ,
- If KG & E would be interested in purchasing the i eystem, and we hope they are, the council would I like to meet with the officials of the company
/ {h.
ht to discuss this matter.
*;& .?
We would like to hear from you if you are and also Ef I l}k 3sV' 4'
,E would like a letter from you if you are not.
Thank you. (/ p pl. ' Q .r' - h t.'l rf J
}$D .s,' .qh O' 6 f).L.Y urs truly Y, ([ 'e 8
p' t. BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNING BODY h kN j pTL
\ uj 1 7/. ] /e w1 r & - .g,s',@'Qq )f ) J' OI p* .
i
'l L., 1 ( .' . fC f < 1 i Cit) Clerk l %[d.f %,
f _ ye..w@r.
.6 ympg%. .e.1.~,r,9 Md,.eu,2BlBEM p# g.,,3.g;.-.E f-1 . .g 6s '.v n.w ._.er - -- - m ~*
y - ,y. g g.: j., - 2;. p.a -- - - E anEd EEEEh*c S k'. EE *d
.--- g -- g ayy. ' ~ ~' .h.':.....
f 35M*T&!
- M ' a.6-2 PO e nn stFF sty.8 67 o INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE g cg.sgr.gu.
1%. , g r.;covio y hv i MAY a.1::93
> + , . ~h._
to. Mr Dennis Evans - ;'" l _-
/
l _wa DATE. May 8, 1979 'd , [;;l,--- .. scw .
$UsJECT [; ., # .O = K.i~i.-
_ se r .
~ --.J .'
Rufus Monroe, City Cl'erk-Oswego, stopped by Neosho Plant today d]. F ._ and visited with Dick Curtis to find out who he could talk to -P.'! - - - regarding the sale of Oswego's electric system. Dick Curtis Zv. _ . . called me and I visited with Mr Monroe. _,--- Mr Monroe stated that both KP&L and Empire were coming in to *- make a survey of Oswego's system. They plan to do this within the next two months. He mentioned that he had visited with you about 3 or 4 months ago to see if KG&E would be interested in their system and , at that time you had indicated that due to litigation we were
'O not in a position to make a definite commitment.
Mr Monroe stated that the city would be interested in having KG&E take a look at their system. He wanted us to know the system is definitely for sale and would like to know what our thinking might be at this time. I told him I would pass this .J information on, that you were gone this week and that we would be back in touch with him as soon as possible. 'v pf l Should you want to call Mr Monroe, his telephone number is (316) 795-4433. s. 9 ik b i i /\ r y
-\ fQ l
VR/ck / 4/'.3/ pM \'
,/ f(I A
ob / [N W K Woolery g {, f f h Q t v
}+g 4 9 .y
- k . /. .?
a
. .. . B.6-3 CIM OF OS"1CJ m..m.c h- 1.: liv I)Il'i.
703 5th Street 'l filCilVLD I, JAMES D. LTEPHENS OSWEGO, KANSAS 67356 ;;
.^ gpg g { *7"_ m uy, 316-795 4403 .
JJud - h_,_. noe.uaw carvy (03. ::. 0a (LLIOf f / IVAAS D L - TARRY D. WALKER March 28, 1980 rirnacn city superintendent 7,i,$ HARITORD IVY KC(5flR
' n cate nurus M. MONROE '
city eterk Kansas Power and Light Company r tt ,,, _
,.,;ssi Wichita, Kansas 67202 aoctm nuts FUOO10ll sprace. a s1tf.
NADiNE HERRIDGE IAE
- city Treasurer
Dear Mr. Evans:
[Q'(( It has been some time since we have contactchtv"""" 5tt your company regarding our Oswego City electric ! JOHN F. AMOs distribution systen. The City received offers fctr--- --J city Attorney the purchase from Kansas Power and Light Company and Empire District. Empire District was considerably over the Kansas Power and Light offer, however, Empire District subsequently withdrew their offer. JOHN D. SHERWOOD Municipe Juog. My reason for writing at this time'is to advise you that the City is still wanting to sell and we wanted to advise your company of this fact in case you now have any interest in the distribution system. The next City Council meeting is scheduled for April 14,1980 at 7:30 P M. Sincerely yours, mtJ ( ' w James D. Stephens, Mayor 8
'1 1 . . rt y Wy -
h~ - 4 lM ....e...}t sk "t y~am"-u w+ ' n B
" " Y. t . . . . . c" """" E m.. . &.@ -,
W- = -. _ . . . > _. e .
g s.6-4 i ) f. , I, 1 W - i April 9,1980 l. , I\ i!'
\
The lionorable James D Stephens ' Mayor of Oswego 703 Fifth Street Oswego, Kansas 67356
Dear Mayor Stephens:
Thank you for your letter of March 28, 1980. It is our understanding that the City of Oswego is presently receiving its wholesale power from The Kansas Power A and Light Company under a contract which expires May 1,1985. ' .' While your contract remains in effect, we could not seriously ' consider the possibility of retail electric service to your city. Should it become possible for KG6E'to consider retail i service to Oswego, it would be necessary for the city to furnish us some information about its system,as I have previously men-tioned to you; city clerk, Rufus Monroe. KG&E would also expect Oswego to put a price on its system. If you will provide us a with the following data, it would be possible to make a prelim-inary determination as to whether we could justify the investment necessary to purchase your system without adversely affecting the rest of our present customers.
- Price of system (determined by City of Oswego) $
Total energy consumption on sy, stem - (12 months 1979) kwh Peak demand of system (1979) kw System load factor (1979) % SY
Ltr City of Oswego 4/9/80 4 Number of customers and energy, consuraption:
'4 No. of Total Kwh Customers Consumption I
d 4 Residential Connercial Industrial Street Lighting Other Municipal Services (Such as parks, sewer, baseball field lighting, etc.) TOTAL Sincerely. I DE/nb I bec - Messrs W X Cadman , S M Haden J A Templin , Bill Whitmer W K Woolery
- 1 .
1 e 4 8 .
. . B.7-1 i
- August 3, 1979
. ;le f.
- i. . .
,r. $ ,c,.
8/8/79 copies to Messrs W K Cadman t . R E Phillips l 'v, .. . . Jim Lucas (' ' 17f ': '.l e .' .- Dennis Sherwin
, W K Woolery 20 . . 'l Mr D D Robb - DD Robb and Associates, PA I't Consulting Engineers
- 402 NBA Building
.. P O Box 941 '.'l." ' .
- salina, Kansas 67401
Dear Mr Robb:
)b: Mr Ruddick asked that a copy of our terminated agreement and service schedules with the City of Girard be sent to you.
p k Attached is a copy of the following: Is Electric Interconnection Contract dated March 21,1967 f' Service Schedule A effective July 1,1967
-d Service Schedule B effective July 1,1967 '
Service Schedule C effective July 1,1967
}(... .-'
l tE Amendment No. 3 Amendment No. 4 fff
\~ In May 1978 we advised the City of Girard that this contract would be terminated effective July 1,1981.
[,;. 1, ' Please advise if additional information is needed. 3 I Sincerely. 1'1 , L .
.' /vr Attach cc - Mr Bernard Ruddick be. - Messrs S M Haden Bill Whitmer f .-
B.7-2 8/8/79 - Copy to W K Cadman Bill Whit.mer P R E Phillips Jim Lucas S M Haden Dennis Sherwin W K Woolery August 7, 1979 Mr. Dernard Ruddick . Vice President - Engineering Kansas Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201 RE: City of Girard.
. Power Supply Study i
Dear Mr. Ruddick:
Thank you for sending us the " General Conditions for Interconnections -- ." 'At present I have no background for judging if the present interconnection equipment will suffice in the future. I only suppose now that the structure and trans-formor at Girard belong to the City. A copy of your present (terminated?) agreement with Girard also has arrived from Mrs. Ridgeway. I will thank her directly and outline the additional information that will be needed in order to prepare reasonable cost estimates of future power supply from KGE. i for your assistance. Thanko agai'n p Sincerely,
/ v M - ,, D . D. Robb DDR:ss cc: Vorna L. Ridgeway< /
g g6789 8 + 4*'t,
@ Allq1979 %
e
&; CG=:
- 13 .
%, ..v:n.n.h?
Services
'et -,Q 4;g~7g;7W t
B.7-3
.j- a !!/!!/79 - Copy to W K Cadmati f. - l / Bill Whitmer R E Phillips l D. O. ROBB AND ASSOCIATES, P. A. Jim Lucas CONSULTING ENGINEEAS henn erwin Electric Power Systems W K WOOlery 0
402 NBA Building August 7, 1979 salina. Kansas 67401 Telephone (913)8256889 Mrs. Verna L. Ridgeway Assistant Vice President Kansas Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201 RE: City of Girard Power Supply Study
Dear Mrs. Ridgeway:
Thank you for sending us a copy of the agreement and service schedules with the City of Girard. We have been retained by Girard to prepare a cost-type study to guide the City in planning for its future power supply. The study is needed because of the imminent need for generating capacity expansion at Girard, should operation continue with an interconnec-tion agreement similar to the present (or expired?) contract with KGE. We have been directed to examine all reaaonable sources for power supply to Girard, including: I (a) purchase of all power and energy from KGE. (b) total self-generation by Girard. (c) all feasible and available methods of operation with mixed purchased power and self-generation. l In order to prepare the comparative cost-type study required,
- we will need cost information about all feasible operating arrange-i ments, like (a) and (c) above, tr.at can be offered by KGE.
l Your assistance in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, l V V' % 478970,, D. D. Robb, Ph.D. [ <8 4 AUG1979 6 DDR:ss I h Cust !.Comm. k Services cc: Bernard Ruddick f S?,.c a c$y
5, ; B.7-4 ,
'l r .
i .
.!( ?! .
9 'e- *
- s_ , , * .
;y . , J - .
August 15. 1979 - Ei,; . . . . f.e. ., . . . .
~
Q, , !;. ,,- i 6 . Mr. D. D. Robb, Ph.D.
. - Consulting Engineer . . PO Box 941 * '? ,s ,
Salina, Kansas 67401 .
Dear Mr. Robb:
T. *
- Thank you for your letter of August 7,1979. '
V.,*,, Attached is a copy of our rate schedule P1N-575, and Fuel Adjustment
$.p; - . . .W Clause Rider, which would be applicable should Girard decide to purchase '
l
'3 all power and energy from KG&E. This rate schedule is a part of our f: .(
Federal Energy Regulatory Comission rate filing in September 1977. An initial decision rendered by the judge in this rate _ case indicates the
.'A rate will be increased 20% to 25%. depending on the load characteristics -
of the customer. You may want'to take this into consideration in your
& ,'- 4;.' . ' studies. ,
f.. .%.' We are working on a proposed Generating Municipal Electric Service Agree-
*>.~.
ment, which we hope to have available by September 15.. When this is
,,'(('c . available, we will fomard a copy to you. -
- ,s -
l
- f.g. , . . '
Let me know if you have questions. .- - p
. Sincerely. - .? ; . %.;, , , .x; .'
y.,
;m < , .
e -. .' ^
- t. a.
;s . , . , n- r <
S,.:y,-.'.o
" ' VR: mat. - ~ >. - . n.
Attachrents_ . ,,
% . .. ~-
- c. '
2 ... .
.,.v ..#
bec: Messrs. W. K. Cadman
. W. K. Woolery
- Bernard Ruddick I .'
Bill Whitmer
~
R. E. Phillips , ,
? , . Jim Lucas , . , S. M. Haden '.- ,. . , Dennis Shemin .
l
^
Cr e i </ </ rs Copics to: Messrs. Cadman a,7-5 Woolery l, Ruddick Whitmer Phillips Q O. ROB 8 AND ASSOCl/JES, P. A. Lucas CONSULTING ENGINEERS Haden, S.M. , Electric Power Systems - Sherwin 402 NBA Buildirty P o. Box 941 Telephone (913)8256889 August 20, 1979 Sahna Kansas 67401 Verna L. Ridgeway Assistant Vice President Kansas Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201 1 RE: City of Girard power Supply Study
Dear Mrs. Ridgeway:
Thank you for seniling the pWM-575 rate schedule and fuel clause rider, which would be applicable in case Girard should decide to purchase all power and energy from KG&E. In order to estimate the purchased power costs as accurately as possible, I will need data about the magnitude of the fuel adjustment charges that are now being made under this rate schedule. Can you furnish recent fuel adjustment charges for n year or so past so that I might see the trend? Are you in position to make any predictions about the future trends of fuel adjustment charges under this rate schedule? We are looking forward to receiving the propcaed Generating Municipal Electric Service Agreement as soon as possible. Thank you for your continuing assistance.
' b Sincerely, / -
9 , /I'l* ' r' p.f;$g,@ia%;>d i dAg' ' s A ## , Q D. D. Robb, ph.D. n [20?'P> 4 4-DDR:ssif e AL'Gl979 ' g b CuC. E. Cemm. 5 D,, SCfVICCS O'
%g O/S $y ggf
- s. M 9/5/79 - copies to Messrs W K Cadman W K Woolery 4
Bernard Ruddick f Bill Whitmer O O. ROBB AND ASSOCIATES, P. A.R E Phillips as CCNSULTING ENGINEERS , Electric Power Systems Dennis Sherwin P.O. Box 941 402 NBA Buildenc Salina, Kansas 67401 Telephone (91382%889 September 4, 1979 g, Vernal. Ridgeway Assistant Vice' President Kansas Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS G7201 RE: City of Girard l Power Supply Study
Dear Mrs. Ridgeway:
We have a question about the definition of " adequate reserve capacity," which is found in Schedules A, B and C of the 1967 Girard contract. We are assuming that similar wording for " adequate reserve capacity." will appear in the proposed new contract. Is the 25% reserve requirement based upon the use of gross (total installed) generating capacity of Girard? Or is it based upon the first-contingency generating capacity, where the one largest unit is assumed to be out of service? Many thanks for your continuing assistance. Sincerely, D. D. ROBB AND ASSOCIATES, P.A.
/ G WJL4 D. D. Robb, Ph.D.
DDR:ss s5678s k + I
- se191' 54%
% Cust &comm 5 p iCSS 9*e d0223
s - . e B.7-7 1 Septenber 10, 1979 Mr. D. D. Robb, Ph.D.. Consulting Engineer - P0 Dox 941 - . Salina, Kansas 6,7401-
Dear Mr. Robb:
Attached is a copy of our proposed Generating Municipal Electric Service Agreement and Service Schedules A, B, C, and T, along with a copy of our letter of Septerter 4 to Mayor Hell. Paragraph 3.3 under ARTICLE III in the attached Agrecront defines adequate reserve capacity. This definition is also contained in Service Schedules A, B and C executed by the City of Girard in March 1967. - Installed generating capacity as mentioned in paragraph 3.8 means the City's gross generating capacity less station uses.
- Let me know if we can be of further help.
Sincerely. ' r -
'g VR: mat Attachments bec: Messrs. W. K. Cadman
- W. K. Woolery Bernard Ruddick .
Bill Whitmer R. E. Phillips . Jim Lucas S. M. Haden . Dennis Sherwin 4 4-8 g .
i 1 Scr ter ber 4, 197') l Tbc 18onoralelo !!1cki !!oII, Fayor City of Cirard
' 100 ";o. O. marl <
( i Cirard, ransas 66743
Dear ifayor l' ell:
Enclosed are the nov generating runicipal electric rervic.- arre:r ent n ,. ' oppropriate service cchedules for .the City of Cirned, nlon.a el tb .1 cery of General Conditions for !taking !!an-Cor.pany-/1vr.ed I'nnnect ions in rime ; l Can and F.lectric Company's Transmission Systen. t'any Inuts have been epent in atteeptInn to see that tie r.;rcer. era vad .; echedules are equitahic nnd provide oppropriate protection to Fo.h l pa rt ies . 'l' The net imnthly ratcu are not chown in the at tac ed cervice rd en:!r e. The approprinte nnounts til11 Fe calculatc<!, /!rcu.=e.cd with fru- e it -- included t*fth t!e extcutcd arrecrents arti sebedulen s. Fen f f Icc' i t t'- t'it l Fec'erni F.ncrpy Reputatory Conrisalon.
, If flied today the prospective rates would be an follotn.:
1 Schedule A $3.00 per kw per runth
! 16.65 n111s por kwh per ronti, Schedule B 17.5 rtills per kuh per tor s:
Schedule C Price deternined at tin cf urd nce Schedule T 00.55 per kw per ron d ( ra r - 1 t ur en one 'i:51T or total chary,e) Please understood that the rates quoted above in e.9 vay cre futcr '< d to reprenent the lovel of costs that may be experienced ty tha correnv et the tine of the execution of the agrecrent. I'n nure that you will vant to have sone t ire to review the ret eemi r snel schedules with 3ou city cormission at well nr have yrur atN rnry I l 1
e revlev thee. Vben you have done this, plent<* contact rr ni yi r r corve n-lence to that va r.ir.ht arrant:0 a tir.c for us to r,ct top.other nnd dire' int any rtuestions you may have. Sincerely,
- e. DE/vp Encl.
i cc: Ms. Jean !!. Folln, City Clerk bc: U. K. Cadman G. L. l(oester/Uoolery R. E. Phillips Bernard Ruddick Jin Lucas Bill Whitmer Ralph Forter Bob Steiger S. M. lladen e l i. 1 e i. I
\
')l ' ? l Tl }l u W!wt hsa ' -
D D. ROB 8 AND ASSOCIATES, . A. ; CONSULTING ENGINEERS Electric Power Systems P.o. Box'941 402 NBA Building Telephone (913)8256889 September 12, 1979 saiina,xansas s7401 Verna L. Ridgeway Assistant Vice President Kansas Gas' and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201 RE: City of Girard Power Supply Study
Dear Mrs. Ridgeway:
g. W Could you please verify our understanding of the maximum amount of energy that is available under Art. Y f 1.1 of the Firm Power Service Schedule? Supposethat/ggd]jM ,./ firm power service of 500 kW is desired for 90 days. 90 Days = 2,160 hours. yfprt Then we believe that the maximum amount of energy that could be taken under Schedule A during the 90- j[< f
.j day period would be as follows: < .
500 kW x 2,160 Hrs x 0.60 LF = 648,000 kWh Is this understanding correct? Thank you. Sincerely, i D. D. Robb, Ph.D. DDR:ss I 18910 fly 4 8 0 e zh w' #9c# 3 E a 9 0 s%e9f
fx hedW L B.- A, r.i t% eh S O O. CONSULTING ROBB AND ENGINEERS ASSOCIATES, [jlg P. A[/.. Electric Power Systems
- we <.x e NN%889 September 12, 1979 jf7 s'a /u.[a'nsaI67$1 32n Verna L. Ridgeway Assistant Vice President Kansas Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201 RE: City of Girard Power Supply Study
Dear Mrs. Ridgeway:
This is to thank you for your letter of September 10, with the proposed new municipal generating agreement. Thanks also for the clarification of the definition of " adequate reserve capacity". We have a question about the Transmission Service schedule, although there is no presently known interest at Girard in ex-changes with other municipals. The charges described on page T-3 seem to define 50% of the total charge. Where is the other 50%? Is it paid by the second municipal party to the whee ~.ng What if three municipals exchange power among them-j operation? j}g,"'17". *."< " "" **" ~ ? W41t;,2- ,s3po co gg v In Art. 3.6 on page 6 of the Agreement, it appears that the
/ge t City will not be required to participate in activities such as ,p' generation changes required for load frequency control, economic dispatch control, etc. Is this understanding correct? - g[
In Art 1.4 on page 3 of the Agreement are described both generation control equipment and telemetering of.the net power and reactive flows to KGEE. Do you feel that it is likely that
~
such equipment will be required during the term of this Agreement? O The point is of some importance because we need to identify as accurately as possible all of'the costs of the various sources of power supply to the City. -..g ;g ufA) [ A_r. 4d d ,u/y % 11 Thanks again for your continuing assisUance. A-4 L, di' 5 Sincerely, 3E gust. g 979g $ i y Ser..;q"Un. y D. D. Robb, ph. D q,%f egestM . DDR:ss
s.7-lo September 18, 1975 Mr. D. D. Robb, Ph.D. Consulting Engineer PO Box 941 Salina, Kansas 67401
Dear Mr. Robb:
This is in response to your questions contained in your letters of September 12, 1979. (1) Transmission Service - Assuming two municipals are involveil in transmission service, each municipal would pay 50% of the total charge. If three municipals were exchanging power, each municipal would be billed for their contracted amount. For example, one municipal contracts for 10,000 kw and the other two contract for 5,000 kw each. The one municipal would be billed on the basis of 10,000 kw and the other two for 5,000 kW each. (2) ARTICLE III, Paragraph 3.6 - Your understanding is correct. (3) ARTICLE I, Paragraph 1.4 (Sub-paragraph (b)) - This equipment may never be required. We do not consider it likely, in Girard's case, that such equipment would be required during the initial tem of the proposed agreement. (4) Firm Power Service - It is KG&E's intent that Firm Power Service contracted for under this schedule through a Letter of Intent be for a minimum tem of one year. At the present time we do not have a short tem fim power schedule. To answer your telephone questions of this morning: , (1) According to our records and information, the city owns'the 69 kV transformer . located just outside the power plant. (2) Proposed rate increase on PWM rate. Attached is a copy of rate schedule PWM-178, and appropriate Fuel Adjustment Clause Rfder, which may be helpful to you in your computations. I
I e
< , j l
Mr. D. D. Robb i
-l Page 2 ~ ' ' , , i September 18.,1979 '
1 ,
. Based upon the ruling by the FERC administrative law judge. . '.., Mich must be approved by the commissioners, we feel that a l ;M . , .15% reduction in the Net Monthly Rate may be forthcoming. -
i < Do not hesitate to call if you have additional questions.
.p( e '. ,..e .s <
r.g ' ./ Sincerely. . S'- t .. . .* .
- . [28k ,
' o t , , .
e.c . c .. . i,- Qt n .
. . .# g . '.3 -
6, e. .
~
tg w
,(hy?.? ..-VR: mat , ,,f.. . .4. i . Attachments' . $it . ~ .";,,. c , bc:' Messrs. W. K. Cadman* ,
g .; '. ,f' . W. K. Woolery
- Bernard Ruddick ,
Bill Whitmer Oba
- 75 -
- s R. E. Phillips 4 . Jim Lucas kg;'f .S. 3. ., ?
S. M. Haden "e 7 , . . Dennis Sherwin .
,p o e ,4.,. L .[,;k' .,. ..
Y'9 j ,,
. 4 *.t ,5 ,*
e'<h ' Lt.s . ,'v r
,4
- t% .
g % '$ .,
% ,h w.
is Q. - . [Ms.,;.- y:.. .. y -
. h*f I $ , . . , . . . . . . . - . , - .
_ - . l l B.7-ll Q O. ROBB AND ASSOCIATES, P. A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS - Electric Power Systems P.O. Box 941 402 NBA Building sane Kansas 67401 Telephone (94)8256889 September 21, 1979 i p?425?g
& k e h SE.P19N $
22 Comm. S Verna L. Ridgeway '3,CUS g g Assistant Vice President 4 Kansas Gas and Electric Company o,+cf ob' P.O. Box 208 #ttl0tGBL Wichita, KS 67201 RE: City of Girard Power Supply Study
Dear Mrs. Ridgeway:
Many thanks for your letter of September 18 and for the PMW-178 rate schedule. I take it that our projections of future power supply costs, should generation at Girard be discontinued, should be Is this correct? 4 estimated with PMW-178 in lieu of PMW-575. Would the historic fuel adjustment factors for 1/78 through 8/79, that you sent recentlyIffor use with PMW-575, not, please send similar, also be applicable with PMW-178? factors that would have been applicable recent fuel adjustmen to PMW-118. has.9AD wD 9elALA {))>ss) I fear that we still have a question about 1.1 the of maximum the Firm amount of energy that is available under Art.I see clearly that a one-year contrac Power Service Schedule. 1,000 kW is needed for one year. is desirabic. Suppose that Then we believe that the maximum arrount of energy that could be taken under Schedule A during the one-year period would be as follows: 1,000 kW x 8,760 Hrs x 0.60 LF = 5,256,000 kWh 61 Is this understanding correct? Sincerely, l SOCIATES, P.A. 1 D. D . ROBB AND l n
)Qn D. D. Robb, Ph.D.
DDR:ss _. ~- ~_
B.7-12
- o Septenber 25, 1979 Mr. D. D. Robb, Ph.D. ; Consulting Engineer PO Box 941 Salina, Kansas 67401
Dear Mr. Robb:
You are correct . . . should Girard decide to discontinue all generation, then costs should be estimated using Phl78 with a 15% reduction as stated in my September 18 letter. Attached is a table showing the fuel factors applicable for the P%178 rate for the period January 1978 through
;I Septenber 1979. My apologies for not including this with the rate schedule.
The 60% load faGor maximum specified in Service Schedule A means that energy taken under this. Schedule cannot be greater than at a 60% load factor on an annual basds. Your example of the City contracting for 1,000 kw for one year is correct--1,000 kw X 8760 hours X 60% load factor = 5,256,000 kw. Please advise if you have additional questions. Sincerely, VR: mat Attachment bc: Messrs. W. K. Cadman W. K. Woolery . Bernard Ruddick , Bill Whitmer . R. E. Phillips . Jim Lucas . S. M. Haden . l Dennis Sherwin ( t l lt
Fuel Adjustment Factors (FAPWM) PWM-178 Factors January 1978 3.10 Mills February 5.98 March 3.46 April 2.75 May 2.71 June (0.51) July 2.42 August 2.87 September 2.29 October 1.64-November 0.93 December 2.50 January 1979 0.75 February 4.36 March 6.88 April 5.30 May 3.72 June 3.93 July 4.80 August , 3.77 September 2.95 I
,, , Bo7-13 jr Ilt t !a 'l ~
l f t' D. O. ROBB AND ASSOCIATES, P. A. , CONSULTING ENGINEERS q ,.<l Elects:c Power Systems ,,e
,f 402 NBA Building October 17, 1979 / g,/t/ P.O. Box 941 Telephone (913)8256889 .i,) / ,,[/ Salina, Kansas 67401 '[ fl ? l(;f} E Verna L. Ridgeway Assistant Vice President Kansas Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 208 Wichita, KS 67201 Re: City of Girard Power Supply Study
Dear Mrs. Ridgeway:
Here are some questions that I think are likely to arise. It will be very helpful if you can send answers.
- 1. Is it true that all of the rate schedules and contract terms that can be applied to municipal electric utilities now have to be filed with and approved by the FERC?
- 2. Does the KCC now have jurisdiction over the rate schedules and contract terms between Kansas utility com-panies and municipal electric utilities?
- 3. Is it true that a utility company in Kansas is required to offer the same rate schedules and terms to all municipals on its system? If not, to all municipals in the same area?
Your continuing assistance is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, I D. D. Robb, Ph.D. DDR:bb gjargy 0 OCT1979 T.2
=
3 S Cust.
$ Services & Comm. & %,41.tcC&$
l
. i . .c . is, . , .% . ,;p * , . . ,s ;-* * ). T,f l t , ., ., ,, & a ,.s:7 -
14r -,,.W. ss,x.Q,, i ,
.s>. s. ~ ~ . '. .@ o .n..a a s....:. . . ..~e, . . m. . .s,. ..? s,, .4
- 3. . . 2. e .
- c:. ?,. . i, . .: .,
q ,,w . . x9;q. .. - c <a
. . . . i ,.g. . . <.9. .. .. 4 4.
S,y,m. p.c. w. . c:. , ,y.
. i. ,> m - ' .. : c. -
5.: y
,. M m g .. .
N . ... . .?.q;.A.?. 4
.s e. ,,E m. . ~ y n .<? N .,. .,: . ....'.....o...f. i .... ,.c;.<.. i. s, .G ., . , .n. . . ..y e..... .k 1
- . . . w ,.
'c ;p,%. a. , %c;2.', W> :. %.v W .e.c .. .. a. w . . . .. . . 1 i ~. ., s . n . ;, ..w .!'.s ..-s . . dM ..w . . ,e ut':: .>..- . >. ' . . . ~4 ..v ,J .A. . w . q .,. . .w , ; .; g.,.,..,.3 .n . o . s.s .. i. . .4,.,.. , v . ... . . y 3.. (. ..a . . o . ,
i a. L . ,. . A QQ : P' .%. x W.% % ~ b 1 i. 4 . a
- f "' '
\ Q'.., & p$,Wil <,i,.Q.D'..~..
O ' O 6M. &@ 9,;..Q,Y+2c f*'y Wh f.f e. . .. . ef.h' E
.. .. . , , , . m J.*
- 15 .1 . l. js .',,') s &,
.:'- +a-ly & g%.N h ....h...a W.c $ .d M iM.'kmy.Oci.ober[26,'1979 .
I
.m. c w .[g'M, . d.h. u .W.2 m . .h. x..N,Nh.. '{ <e w.b . .n. , .. f'k. ,, . m 'y ' .. d e t%g., Vgo?c. ,m,.,.;%?c?~' l M, = . ^ ,4.Vy6 . u. .. %p .. . . . t.
- . o . "'t . i. * ~
. .;'i . n- .'i.
q>.
. Q*.;*h.QN' t .,';'y'. G.c . <{' S.&Qe$hk:\ . 'M[,DlD.NRobD,'Ph.'D .'.V n.yy? c,%(;W Lv.*.W..m'f.
- %W A... : 2. . f gff ..*. (E ,.M, N ,'
s 4,0 ; ';: . . M,e;?$. Q.y. [ i Q .T.9 S.h Consultinf Engineerc;. &" $ M.M.,{ @7. E M ' . ...hf
. , 1 f. ". ? r NYL'hi$ .g Q . @# h M dSalina,eKansas,6740l M $ , %f 3 w .xP0 Box:941 ' t Mm / .c c v/ d'. '! mi. -e.',.. ).M~4. h. r M.W.FU.. ..,...@' @ .* T. >'.'. -)di '
- h
' W, d- # 3"' . X My apo logies.for theidelay in Vresponsesto'your' letter'of. ., ,i }. t ,
($py. fd ~4 @,4 c * .&lQ:n. W, October ,
' - "a ' .17,.; ,Here are, ' ;, " ^ .the [ ' .. .'_. answe . W .? - .,1, .f . }:i Gg 7 l " y g ;., %1, e All municipal'. contracts and rate sche'dules 'must have' FERC. s: ,.,:: ... % .C= n 'o;' ' ' ' 3 f .h, ;.4., 2;,.[j APPNvall. <;;,p, . . O, y.g. A;j,.gf. h.i P} [# p ; ....g' ,.;,#, ,.
h 5.. <dh. . 2.: KCC has. no juri.sdiction.Lin.-y.dealings between utilities..
.$.4,C.P;#.> . >.. ,.. ,1.The m
r : ,e . O.
$$kb5.: ,'k, };.,[agmunicipal{ttes.g.[(p;g,;gg. ,
y'rj 'j;j.1/ ~/ . 4 . , ,.l' .
.. ~. -. &.g.:$*F.". . r . .e t .. . . . . .f . .: - . J '! e (p. -:q,.@'.c.dt.wc.u,W.S;.3.4FERC.7 q' - . . . e. . . g%g .3 f .- "** servip&e.
character requires that'
+ '.; -..'.' g.T f.. wy rates' 4 ', y . W.
and ",
- h. 'Y
- r. ' . .: 1sticslare ?; ".r.p; . the "same'.)s@i #. *
;. .% . q.y y; a.
A. .1 :g
. .c~ .,
it n*
;.yJ:g 5.f.q,:. ?,w fU.Please:.let.me' knowrif uwe:can be, of?furthem. assistance.v,c.L . ' . ?, ,
R:/
. W.,,,g//d .[gg i . ,
Q ?. 4 '.V, .# . ,,'g g,., .3
- u 5 e M y % -/ , */ i g.,a v ( ;,s., J.. .Q
.W h#
1 .$. < f\ . g h $h. 9,*./,D w'1;
.t * ,4, . - k :.vh. '" '
5 : 3&
.4 y,\'iSin'cerelyk*
v :.4,t; w . $:e .t ? v.*..
,,lh' 7.! T. h ~ - 1 ?, . . . - . ( ',Y 'a h )lff Y i +: & ! q' "s.Y[N. if k/ ' .s ~ $ ., '*
l, f ," ? D S 'f+,f'.. D
- .. Ma.C ~:,,.n&%M @ @- %+N, ;, % 3 -. ,.
- W* q.&,~ w94 j..p..-;$ ;o ..p.g..;.&
. ~;.?
W
.w *t ..)Q.f Me. 'Y.y&.W"!T*?.?m.l; nft . $. 0 - 0A % ' &. 'd ' Q *.4 b: R, :$ DS.L L Q ,y Wii.=.?.e' d e(b h i ' ^a 8 i ; f *. .; .
- Q'?)4'e, $
$J...:. . C. lW N.. r .:$.,;. h,4I?>Q ? kAMiWA 's*< a , M @,:r. % VR:.< mat::M:
- w. .,,7 47.cy 7-- w9 %
w ex.;.w,YW.$ff@}Y..Q W'N
..yrm' 'c.y..;J:.N, ?"'/,.m+t.-
rw .... E. 'q'-W&,9 .OiWh'
.a &lp*,.f'f 2 MweV '( &. . ;, :Y & - : .t .....,. %~. . .y . :
- 'o i.,
..'.s .? . .t ,
bCC: ?Nr. 8ill Whitmer , l .[ 9.: ."j/*. ,,'t ..j. ..
,;y.s q. / + m. , . .. . . . m -
c .. -
- 3. %.g.t..
. .. .. . . . . y. . , 3.:. .. . 7, k...
g.",
. ,.. . . 4. . . . > gr $' .4',',,..,. 3, - .+- . r{ '.},'. i j aM'g. Q ' J ..j,7 ; ltg \
Qsp;.6&(,.'
.x.% - d' y ., . . . :: .e a. v. .< .y ..;, + , ;;, ,'. ?., . : pa 4,4.o,y :..c ; .c, F . . .,.;.. .. ~ 0, 5 . ~ - oN! .m .- ,- r 1 w+. ,ags g ., - i. ; .. i Y/n s. , % .
9*
> r.- '
W-
,l ,. Gl Q <d., *-
e.
'4 - .q \' - .~%. ; ,P . " ' eff< ';y? ;.L
- *r;9. . . . ' '
1. p,. ;f. .f..
. , . , p . .* _ .h - *-
w
',.y% ' % 'L' *:...-l,k.S
, W'5.? jW}W? ,- y ,
*:\ f .l- ,
L~
% - [, 'M . ' , .. ; - ,u s . , ..~w a. ; ,,-. r. c. .k.
s g* 9 9. , , w-;r y , .. . . . . .
- - ~ . A,.
sf ...u , ; ....??. ;. . O,. . . .
.7 .,,. . + , >... . s. ,s 9, . n.- '
ftl e? .f*$. d., 43 . _ ' ( g
.L ,
e, ' , h 3.7 2154 C.!?.:j
..w ' -
y,
. j)\E'). \ J,p 4,gt 'A 0 ,%0
- n. y,Yy; \ Y 'h
# 5 [
kp Mr. Max Haden c
- 9p*
- <, . ,.
. u .< ': - December 18, 1979 p.f ( N, . {i m}f,j.,7.c
. v ';.
f.',, ;. - - .X,l{. ^ 9 7, - Attached are two copies of our proposed Agreement For Wholesale Electric Service along with two copies of Rate Schedule PWM-178.
.[, ,,. ,e ,
Please deliver _one copy of the agreement and a rate schedule to c, the city of Girard. You might want to explain that this rate schedule
.r- "is pending before FERC and subject to change. We have not attached a Fuel Adjustment Clause Rider for this rate schedule; however, fuel adjustment factors used with this rate schedule were furnished to % ;i, ,
Mr. Robb in Septenber,1979. A copy is attached.for your use. :# N~ . Please mention to the city that these factors are alsa subject to
' change.
i .' , \ ' d ' .. :/
. R'$,- .',i-4.. ,
W.;., ,,
'" ) VR: mat ) '- Attachments G'.l - . s
- cc: Mr. Bill Whitmer .
f' . E j' 1 $ 0 - p& ar,
~
w~ d I . . 9
/W B.7-16 k'
Mr. Dennis Evans k February 12, 1980 Max Haden called this morning stating he had received a call from Bill Senecaut. Utilities Connissioner in Girard. The city of Girard is very seriously considering closing down their generating l plant and taking a new PWM Wholesale Agreement with KG&E. The taking of a PWM agreement now is contingent on securing from KG&E a two-waf feed from us to their system. By copy of this letter I am asking Messrs. Lucas and Ruddick to check out a two-way feed. Mr. Senecaut would like to have this information as soon as possible. You will recall a copy of our proposed agreement for Wholesale Electric Service was furnished to Girard in December 1979. VR: mat cc: Messrs. W. K. Cadman G. L. Koester W. K. Woolery R. E. Phillips . Jim Lucas , i Bernard Ruddick , Bill Whitmer . S. M. Haden . . Dennis Sherwin .
~ .
B.7-17
% l DENNIS L EVANS .2 .2D -20 ,
D , Id 'A% + N & 6 2 ft % + u . p Rs "1 L%4i ' 6 N. 4Wb KC*C g nn.new4 to<a0M %f. waQ ; mA&Q N 9? N # (7 Q +a4J4 f at/w M y ). l A w a -
%H ual f m p e & to
\i,i w-9/aas M L,faud A v 4 -
*a m F hC _
I s e B.8-1 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE To, Memo to File DAT e, August 25, 1978 SUBJECT, Winfield City Clerk, Ron Musson, called me to discuss f supplying them with rate schedules for LLP, commercial . and residential. They are presently undergoing rate analysis having retained Black & Veatch. During our conversation, he inquired as to the Company's interest to serve Winfield wholesale, retail and/or purchase their generating facility. I replied that I i had no idea . .
. that several avenues may be open, and it would require some study. Pointed out that I was not in a position.to discuss it unless the city commis-sion made a direct inquiry relative to meeting to discuss j the aforementioned items. At that time, proper officials with the Company would be advised, and a meeting arranged to consider their questions. =_ -4W w COMM.
SERV DEPT" I 9 'CEIVED S AUG 2F 197f 2! ARTEPBURN KDLunt/je _m te.:3 __-
.-.crvs - __
Messrs D Evans Es,,n __ .E cc: W Mason , J-fr$-
?:Si.dC[~
_ rv v .
! - 3CES:t3.
M ACELs4 _
~ MON 1 AC;){
T *. 7ATi
. A:00! war
_ Aivf s . _RUCDICK TAfE WAtu;1 WOOLEay a su_
-- . . . . _ ,, y . .
,B.8-2 . #com on atv. : 47 CU'21. & COMM. '- 53 stHV DFPT.
HECOVED 8
,'s SEP 81978 5 INTEROFFICE CO R R ESPON D E NC E s .
U ff9PURN
, J. i 9/8/78 - copy to Messrs W K Cadman jfj,'ji5 ,
t
.- W K Woolery rtter /
5 to. Me . [ File Bob Rives __jfgfcp " ' oars. Sep'tember 7, 1978 hM dS!$6, ap5a JCtsila SUBJECT. JMillie4 dl?.K5 fAFF A00fWAY V d S :n ZS'th WCLEAY Thursday, September 7, 3:30 p.m., Mr. John Elder, Superintendent of Utilities in Winfield, contacted this office relating that Winfield city commissioners at a recent meeting with the Winfield Energy Commissioa directed them to contact KG&E officials relative to discussions concerning, in Elder's words, everything from supplying the city's complete electrical needs , on a wholesale basis to selling out and serving retail to enlarging their interconnect. 3 Mr. Elder proposes that the following individuals would (V like to meet with KG&E officials in Wichita at the earliest possible date, and suggested September 12 or 13. He said that city commissioners would not be represented in that they have asked the Energy Commission to. explore the i various possibilities and report back to them, i Energy Commission members are: Gene Branscum, Vice President with Gott Mfg. Andrew Swoyer, retired from Peabody, Gordon 6 Platt, and former Winfield city commissioner Mr. Elder and Ron Musson, City Clerk and at present, Interim City Manager, were also directed to attend this meeting. l
.. ,, [
KDLunt/jc cc: Messrs D Evans W Mason e w" f - I# Mb Mi
l B.8-3 g ' i Draft 1978, September 8 Suggested reply,to anticipated letter of inquiry from City of Winfield on opening negotiations in line with KG & E memo to file of 9-7-78 from Mr. Lunt. Review if and when such inquiry is received . Thank you for your inquiry of in connection with
/~)}
( your city's electrical needs. Such matters bear, indirectly at least, if not directlp on issues which are the subject of the presently pending proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
~
In these circumstances we feel it would not be appropriate to undertake negotiations on the matter until the intervention in the case by your city is brought to a conclusion either by At such time, if decision of the Commission or otherwise. your interest then continues, we will be pleased to address the matter again. fEk Very Respectfully, l l
- /O-Il B.8-4 wie w ." ' " n .1 m t : tY r t * *
- sowin E surR wswoYic'sYosom
' Q7@ Area Code 316.?114110 Ext. 25 Highway 160 East-P.O. Box 646 c=a'a **'** ( $ - Winfleid, Kansas 67156 AL oulot )
2Ee."In"AD.n wwi.+a. x Ea'riseU 8E m k t. x,, 10/4/78 copy to W K Woolery W G Mason
, , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . 5 " Ken Lunt l cie,cieri"#nUc'e E.rn,, . Fred Knodle '
towReuce s.csRistrusOu
- l
. . . a ,;,, .M .. - .3 Fred: please calculate appropriate e ec .$.*.,.",'t y rei.ry n.
rate for appropriate mont sing their figures -- City Man.ger indicate with or without he 69 kv discount. JOuNELoER
;"',"y,',""'%* September 29, 1978 Director-Publ6c work.
I g, DON K E ARNs
,c i Director-G.s Utsiity / - t s
jim oESSIEN Director-Pubtit Property .l* DEANCROW (p) ,[ 11 *
,f Director-Equipment I'
oira, **'.U?,cewn.
*o Dennis Evans, Vice President I t)'
DALE IRWIN Customer and Community Services ( #[) ., o.rnear-evechesino e o. wine 8Rr=~eR Kansas Gas & Electric Company i g, Police Cheet P. O. Box 208
# N.*E, e","' Wichita, Kansas 67201 8088ERRY oir-e--ciev t.se
Dear Dennis:
Enclosed is data for 1977 and 1978 to date, showing our monthly electric requirements and demands. We would appreciate your billing office computing costs on your PNM rates and supply us with this information as discussed with you. I would also like to have a copy of sample calculations for one month so I might check my figures against yours. cusi S sen.scctw. KCOVEDv. trn. 8 Very truly yours, 5. i
.c OCT, 2 1978 :z 3
c amnu.w
~~gf:ll.W..S Jo W. Elder rddr; /
m at V' Director of Electric Utility _rcn _ t:'.: .it . W L*?: * :. ( _ a.:. .
- I{ , ,,_ .T Ik 5'.
JWE/ab C ~_.'. xc: Ron Musson '.Jr'." .y_..
..~ c r ni.--- -
I +e lU'_.' t.7. _ . .
-..**t . . _ _ _
_ Y .#.* I ' J.'. .. ' l ., ,
- * . ..n_ - j sl( . . . . . . . , ,, , . r. , s . . . .e. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .. -.
y.e. . , 'ta 3. 't . ** 9 g (' ', V - pg e. r u. a . .c m 9.., ,..e., ., p = . ae 3 1. .
- gg+ 4 e =
*.g .P.. '*s . . * . .g 4 .(. g" gS g 8 . 41 ? g
- s'.
-w-w +-- -n.-- .m- , , , _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i
. \ -I.
CITY OF WINFIELD ELECTRIC 17fILITY DATE KW Hrs DEMAND KW 1 January 1977 9,628,400 18,000 February 1977 7,934,500 16,600
) March 1977 8,139,700 15,700 April 1977 7,879,000 16,600 May 1977 9,345,000 19,900 June 1977 12,410,300 27,500 July 1977 15,387,200 33,000 August 1977 13,145,900 32,900 September 1977 10,467,300 26,500 October 1977 ,
8,276,900 15,700 November 1977 8,206,600 15,800 ("h December 1977 8,828,300 17,200 - l i 1
.,. .,-,,-.,,,n .
m., . , . , . . , . - .
3 - CITY OF WINFIELD ELECTRIC 17tILITY DATE KW Hrs DENA10 KW 3
. January 1978 9,752,300 17,300 February 1978 8,836,400 17,200 March 1978 8,690,000 16,700 April 1978 8,035,100 16,000 May 1978 9,229,700 23,600 June 1978 11,241,200 30,600 July 1978 15,348,200 32,600 August 1978 14,376,600 33,600 /
4 o-h 6-w 'k. l. i s s l. 1
.4 l
l-e a
B.8-5 3 , ,- .
#^
4;:
-s
- 1 October 17, 1978 fw Mr John Elder Director of Electric Department City of Winfield P O Box 646 Winfield Kansas 67156
Dear Mr Elder:
Attached, per your request, are copies of billing comparisons using your monthly electric requirements and demands figured on both the PWM-575 and PWM-178 rate schedules. You will note both tabulations include the net bill with the discount and without the discount. You also requested a copy of our sample calculations. We have attached a detail of billing showing the calculations applicable to your July 1978 demand and KWH. One of the detailed bills reflects the
,_s - discount; the other one'is without the discount.
Let us know if you have additional questions. Sincerely. i I DE/ck
; Attachments - bc - liessrs W X Woolery W G Mason , Kenneth Lunt I
, [ , - .s , -' . ; -l(Q-A-l ^ : , _ < ; ~; $,7lk ? 5 6f S,E[ [d J.- J- I ' . E ' '- . N .k'( n .d( $ . ,.~,,
d- 0;
. h [~ (;*k ,:. , n , ~ . . . . - . _ - ~ . . .. -- - - ---- - ---- -- ~ - - - -- - ~ '- ~ v ~ ~~ "~~~"^~-' " " ~ "-
3 D - CITY OF WINFIELD ELECTRIC UTILITY , KGAE RATE SCHEDULE Plot-575 WITH OISCOUNT WITHOUT DISCOUNT MILLS . MILLS DATE DEMAfiD KW KW HOURS GROSS BILL PER KWH FUEL COST NET 81LL GROSS BILL PER KWH FUEL COST NET BILL January 1977 18,000 9,628,400 $ 109,838.44 5.14 $ 49,489.98 $ 159,328.42 5 112,538.44 5.14 $ 49,489.98 $ 162,028.42 February 1977 16,600 7.934,500 92.897.95 6.35 50,384.08 143,282.03 95,387.95 6.35 50,384.08 145,772.03 March 1977 15,700 8,130,700 93,784.27 9.18 74,722.45 168,506.72 -96,139.27 9.18 74,722.45 170,861.72~ April 1977 16,600 7,879,000 92.392.90 8.44 66,498.76 159,891.66 94.882.90 8.44 66,498.76 161,3S1.66 May 1977 19,900 9,345,000 109,330.50 8.64 80,740.80 190,071.30 112,315.50 8.64 80,740.80 193,056.30 June 1977 27,500 12,410,300 145,508.73 6.33 78,557.20 .224,065.93 149,633.73 6.33 78,557.20 228,190.93 July 1977 33,000 15,387,200 178,543.52 .7.27 111,864.94 290,458.46 183,543.52 7.27 111,864.94 295.403.46
! August 1977 32,900 13.145,900 154,770.49 8.78 115.421.00 270,191.49 159,705.49 8.78 115.421.00 275,126.19 . Septecter 1977 26,500 10.467,300 123A22.03 8.20 85,831.86 209,653.89 127,797.03 8.20 85,831.86 213,623.33 October 1977 15,700 8,276,900 .95,032.79 7.42 61.414.60 156,447.39 97.387.79 7.42 61,414.60 158,802.39 Nove=ber 1977 15,800- 8,206,600 94,502.06 6.44 52,850.50 147,352.56 96 872.06 6.44 52,850.50 149,722.55 December 1977 17,230 8.828,300 101,685.53 7.09 62,592.65 164,278.18 104,265.53 7.09 62,592.65 156,853.1?
TOTAL $1,392.159.21 51190,368.82 S2,282,528.03 $1.430,469.21 $890.368.82 $7,320,830.03
~
- v=-:~; 6 ~. 3..
. .... .g:. -y,w,.:, .
w
- s. : ... N.
;: .u.. . '.cpyQi; ..w -L K. hm?*f. h.)& .
' g ,1 % , . 'y , i
- 2
,~ : m
- rf 7 -
j -
, .: , .o = 4 -
m e ;~ ._ e . , ,. . Q~, .
'r-Q,. * , . b4 c ;r_gf C@y .g , , . .
e-cy, ;.;M/r,f
, c ,+;
- _
- . : '. ' , ,, -.n
~
7 ,_
.t' .. . ,~ ~ +; ^ ~
y g- **
- 3 y
+ n c . .., f + <*t ._. _ . _ . . . . . _ . _ - . . _ . > ~ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . . _ . _ _ > . _ . . . . .. ~.~..w .. , 3 .. . . . . - - . -
CITY OF WINFIELD ELECTRIC UTILITY KG8E RATE SCHEDULE PWM-178 WITH DISCOUNT WITHOUT DISCOUNT MILLS MILLS DATE DEMAND KW KW HOURS GROSS BILL PER KWH FUEL COST NET BILL GROSS BILL PER KWH FUEL COST- NET BILL January 1978 17.300 9,752,300 $* 229,352.11 3.10 $ 30,232.13 $ 259.584.24 $ 234,023.11 3.10 $ 30,232.13 $ 254,255.24
- February 1978 17,200 8,836,400 210,251.48 5.98 52,841.67 263,093.15 214,895.48
( 5.98 52,841.67 267,737.15 March 1978 16,700 8,690,000 206,513.50 3.46 30,067.40 236,580.90 211.022.50 3.46 30,067.40 241,089.93 April 1978 16,000 f,035,100 191,966.57 2.75 52,096.53 196,286.57 214.063.10 2.75 22,096.53 218,383.13 May 1978 23,600 9,229,700 227,448.79 2.71 25,012.49 252,461.28 233,820.79 2.71 25,012.49 258,'33.2E. June 1978 30,600 11,241,200 278,991.84 (0.51) (5,733.01) '273,258.83 n 287.253.84 (0.51) (5,733.01)- 281,520.83 July 1978 32,600 15.348,200 366,836.74 2.42 .37,142.64 375,638.74 403.979.38 2.42 37,142.64 412,731.33 August 1978 33,600 14,376.600 348,139.62 2.87 .41,260,84 357,211.62 389.400.46 2.87 41,260.84 392,472.4E i TOTAL $2,059.500.65 $232,920.69 $2,292.421.34 $2,110,152.65 5232,920.69 $2.343,973.3 I 9 4 J
- n. x
. p 49 i. J,oj .. 4 . =
j , ,, , e
-+
_Q ;d:# r*Iw n #l i g?vy;/, tw y,,n,l .. DO AIL Of it UNG -NU 14All c p,.4 1 . -lIggp ... w.e. ivar miiir ; c. . .i i,i n n. u . < g .
. ) . .., .....1.,.....l..,.,.,,.,.,,l.,,,,,,,,...,,j 4,u..; u ;.... .e.' . q cy .4.
j . .., q m . . j .m.v. .u .. . u.- .~
. j g' ' ' lJ V ;.3,s. Ipov. /sp90 :'j,t.'s : ! . 'jj!> sa mlfy,c i ! . , .
epf t
. Iq,jjgj s ,31(osoftU20:.de o,009,yig:,,;.IILnYl.9 >
J's,pE 0 0 ,
*. 'v. ,.g- i.*
US). .op f .: /js;;: / 'l mh.p.;.46g <M i ~ y ( .
. / ' }Vnd D!m
- 1~ f[.. l R@$f:
$19[ p a r. .
y% i j ,,...m s,zggg J, ,i ' .
> = . 5 '/.' 0 'c"~ 'Gl%4f Q'P; ~.YJ 4. b .
o'- , pf.,'f.,.
'situnc cauAmo I.; - $l. \( (ohfwini-I7 t " ~ 30s~0b )$) ic ' " ' 'l05'OI'$l y- - .
4%.M. /# . :,
. p 9:
jj [49-. ._., R.,. ; * ', r 'O u.l / 7 'lE ' ' " " % r'=""~~"Go " ' ~~ (Dy2.'!7. m .. p. ( f.ft / J v l*! ,b -. ~ i
- l. %
>1l k.-Q>! . ;,I y 9;>.6 ; t. . ^ ,
s ;;
\' ^
e
'*.i t...
l A~ n f,k, . . ,
>.m ,
F
- ...,,,,o,...._.
3,- i Jj 9y
- t. <u ?. !.7-y q ,
p . J.
. I . ._
T, ' s. 4 ,
~m..,.._.._ . .sn . .
r g..t< 4
?) ' DETAIL OF BILLING - NET RATE lggy . _t . n ~, o....t.sn , ..
nasis roi mi unc ,o _ towuranoaa
. u. rm.m ,,, ,..,,,l,_
_1_,,u. _ ., , , , , , . ,,,,,, o,, i , I "E 2'81
.pa .i. w , l v..i t .* .. .,4. 4 ' '.e ..e.u) mm coisaa si i v.s in M ca hve. , u:* i> .aic .
4 L I
] * 'J l . . . $,hf,4o'l) ., .. ./S,9 . 3. 0f,#,. 9}.'/j,. ' f00 0y '*p . . . h 7 y.)g p.- .i.Ekte, oo . 07.c.'i.ll:.f.Y',,0Lk ,
2;: o, 4 fe. DNees n 3 t.--.
- . .:g .
l _ . ._ .1.
'6+e i I; . . ..
j l 'u,f. ' I
; - ..m Fi g rp;p' 'C'E l.'$$4r' ,$c *c "* A" 5 2 'j]' j'fa,6 f I < f I . . ~.. .-._ .-. .,. . ...._ . ^ /l 0 .
- y. *
' ;:,';*,o n,tu.sc oemuo 1+---- .
J \ t WW l fog.h n s 171 3 5 5~o I A ) ' ' '"'" 4 YMDE g . ,g
. ., ,n, .
, e : s .. , ~u .. ,. n n . ... - a r-g 7,.-_ -- . 7
;p s . .--.. M a
7,g{<t/y.%.,yers.(gM /
},
( a , e,. , , .
~
l i~ 1
~. n_
fg,,')'t ,fjgi. t/b t t n
, u..n c .t r ...... . ,,,. ,m _..
y
+
r ..
.......~... . , .
yt;i];'..!?
. F", -
( u. . . - J T 1
' ? f,N >6,.
M,t ; g
.g ) ;m3s' - .r I ,
e s K, ,
'., ? lsi; yg,:*
q f. _____._* *_____L.___ _1 ..________________._i_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
B.8-6 o- Meeting with City of Winfield 11-20 /9
-/ Sixth Floor Conference Room John Elder--City of Winfield Jim Lucas Dennis Evans Les Morgan W. K. Woolery Verna Ridgeway ,
Decemoer 4, 1979 Winfield has been studying various ways to insure a more reliable system. If the city were to lose their tie or a transformer, they would have to fire up their old gas turbine and would take several hours. Winfield's present plans are to bolster their tie-in with KG&E. They have no plans t Jd additional units . . . additional capacity will be purchased.from Mr. Elder distributed copies of their Exhibit III, System One Line Diagram showing immediate proposed improvements to their old and new plants. These improvements are scheduled to start in the very near future and include a 69 kv line from the Interconnect Sub to their old power plant and a 69/12/4 kv transformer, all in 1980, and a 69 kv line from KG&E's Oak Sub to Winfield's Interconnect Sub in 1981. Winfield stated they planned to stay with the present KG&E metering location. Winfield feels having three separate lines to their Interconnect Sub will insure greater reliability and is the most economical solution for them. Winfield's long range (15-20 years) plans include closing the 69 kv loop around the city by building a 69 kv line between the power plants. p d
. Winfield asked about building a 69 kv line to parallel with our Oak-Winfield 69 kv line. We have no objection; however we suggested as great a distance as pessible between lines, suggesting the line be constructed east of Strother Field.
KG&E had no problems with their proposed immediate plans. Winfield was asked to send KG&E a letter stating their intentions to construct the Oak-Winfield line and to furnish design plans for this tie for our engineering people to review. They hope to get started on this tie within the next year or so. Winfield was reminded that there is limited capacity in the present Weaver-Winfield-0ak 69 kv line which serves as the present interconnection.
! Winfield is studying the proposed contract and preparing comments.
Mr. Lucas asked Winfield to furnish data on their system power factor under heavy load conditions. This information is necessary for future demand studies. VR: mat
- Bill Whitmer 3 9-1 M.or .. bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach Wilson Cadman -~~
{, G L Koester ,,,, g,, ,,, g ,g 7,c gg,,,, u a n 208 m a.xam n 672o1 o va } nsen , , , , , , , , , , s John Hansberry May 3, 1978 Jt E phillips Bernard Ruddick Harley Macklin R t. Rives . W K Woolery Jim Lucas
) The Honcrable flicki S Neil, Mayor i City of Girard '
l 100 South Ozark
, O Girerd. xanses 88743 I
Dear Mayor fleil:
1 During the past 11 years Y.ansas Gas and Electric Company has provided l electric service to the City of Girard, a relationship.we (njoy and hope i will continue into the future. . . j . . However, almost all utilities have encountered a variety of difficulties in maintainino and increasing service in recent years. I'm sure runy df
these difficulties are not unknown to your city utility. One result has i been that we are not able to recover the full cost of service under present ! rates.
v To help us overcome these difficulties, we are requesting an opportunity to discuss with you a new wholesale contract. He hope to be able to negotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious { ' to begin dir.cussions if the city approves of doing so. So discussions can begin, w must reluctantly give notice of temination. A formal notice of a termination of the existing contract is enclosed. Our hope is to begin discussions at a time convenient for you and with a mutual objective of continuing service with no interruption after the current agreement expires. l Similar notices are being sent to other involved generating nunicipals and I to rural electric cooperatives as individual contracts make it appropriate.
~ ! We appreciate the opportunity to be serving you now and we will look fnr-ward to working out a nutually satisfactory agreement about future service, i
We want to continue to serve Girard and we hope you will continue to find l KGSE is an economical source of electric power. Plesse let me know when you would like to discuss a new agreement. l Sincerely, , l I DENNIS FVANS . DE/vr Enclosure I cc - Mr Gary G Glad, City Clerk 1 ( i .
B.9-2 f=- ..o A MANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. o. Bos 208 %>chsta, Kansas 67201 Thef ELA CTfhC COMfBANF
*ilay 3,1973 p City o'fspirard, a municipal corporation O Attention; The Ifonorable !!icki S fleil, liayor City of Gi' nard ~
100 South dz'h k
] Girard,rdnsas 66743
-l Gentlemen: -
/ . .
J In accordance with ARTICLE X of the Interconnection Agreenent , by and betueen Kansas Gas and Electric Company and the City of Girard dated 11 arch 21,1957, we wish to officially notify the City of Girard that Kansas Gas and Electric Conpany intends to terminate the aforenentioned Interconnection Agreement effective July 1,1981. v tle are supplying this flotice of Intent in accordance with the
.g terms of the Interconnection Agreement and to allow your City y adequate time to investigate all possible options in deternining your power supply for the future. In that regard, Kansas Gas and Electric Cor.pany is willing to discuss the possibility of .s negotiating a new Interconnection Agreement to take effect followi.ng the termination of the current Interconnection Agreement. ~
Sincerely, DENNIS EVANS DE/ck cc - ltr Gary G Glad, City Clerk bc - Messrs S M Haden Messrs Harley Macklin Joe Cumiskey R L Rives Ralph Fiebach W K Woolery Wilson Cadman Jim Lucas G L Koester Bill Whitmer W B Walker Ralph Foster John Hansberry G N Evans ' Howard Hansen Bernard Ruddick R E Philligs
bc - 11essrs Ralph Fiebach Bill Whitmer Wilson Cadman 'iason G L Koester Untasas cAs AND EUCTRIC COASPANY W B Walker 1 h Fosterso,20s w,cn,ra. xansas 6720 Howard Hansen *~ arcr-c c - Evans John Hassberry May 3,1978 R E Phillips Bernard Ruddick Harley Macklin . R L Rives W K Woolery Jim Lucas The Honorable Gordon Tackett, itsyor , City of Wellington Wellington, Kansas 67152
Dear llayor Tackett:
1 During the past 15 years, Kansas Gas and Electric Conany has proviitad electric service to the City of Wellington, a relationship we enjoy and hope will continue into the future, , J However, almost all utilities have encountered a variety of difficulties' in maintaining and increasing service in recent years. I'm sure cany of these difficulties are not unknown to your city utility. One result has been that we are not able to recover the full cost of service under present rates. To help us overcome these difficultics, we are requestinq an ornortunity L to discuss with you a new wholesale contract. '4e hoce to be able to necotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious
.)
to begin discussions if the city approves of doing so. So discussions can
' begin, we aust reluctantly give notice of termination. A forr..al notice of termination of the existing contract is enclosed, a
Our h6pc is to begin discussions at a time convenient for you an.1 with a mutual objective of continuing service with no interruption af ter the cur-rent agreement expires. Similar notices are being sent to other involvel acnerating municipals and to rural electric cooperatives as individual contracts raake it appropriate. I We appreciate the opportunity to be serving you now and we will lonk for-ward to working out a mutually satisfactory acreement about future service. We want to continue to serve Wellington and we hope you will continue to find KG5E is an economical source of electric power.. Please let ne know when you would like to discuss a new agreement. Sincerely, DENNIS EVANS DE/vr Enclosure cc - lir Arthur B Preston, City Manager
, . , B.9-4 f ue KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. o. Bos 208 Wachola, Kansss 67201 FMS SLSCf888C COMm4NY . !!ay 3,1978 City of IIellington, a nunicipal corporation 0- Attention: The lionorable Gordon Tackett, Mayor City of llellington Wellington, Kansas 67152 l Gentlemen:
In accordance with ARTICLE X of the Interconnection Agreement - - m) by and between Kansas Gas and Electric Company and the City of IMllington dated January 7,1963, we wish to officially notify *
^
the City of Wellington that Kansas Gas and Electric Company intends to terminate the aforementioned Interconnection Agreement effective June 1,1981. - t!e are supplying this flotice of Intent in accordance with the v terms of the Interconnection Agreement and to allow your City adequate time to investigate all possible options in determining (is) your power supply for the future. In that regard, Kansas Gas and Electric Conpany is willing to discuss the possibility of negotiating a new Interconnection Agreement to take effect _ _s following the termination of the current Interconnection Agreement. Sincerely,
\l DENNIS EVANS DE/ck cc - lir Arthur 0 Preston, City Manager ,
bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach Messrs W K Woolery Wilson Cadman Jim Lucas G L Koester Bill Whitmer W B Walker Ralph Foster John Hansberry G W Evans Howard Hansen W G tiason R E Phillips K D Lunt Harley Macklin Bernard Ruddick - R L Rives
./ , . ' - I bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach Ralph Foster B.9-5 " 0" . ANS b AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Bos 208 Wichota, Kartsas 67201 W B Wa1ker , , , , , , , , , , , , , _
Howard Hansen ::ay 3, 1973 . John Hansberry R E Phillips Bernard Ruddick
- Harley Macklin I R L Rives
! W K Woolery I Jim Lucas - Bill Whitmer c W G Hason K D Lunt The Honorable itewton Richardson Mayor of Hinfield i q Winfield Kansas 67156
Dear llayor Richardson:
During the past 11 years, Kansas Gas and Electric Company has provided elec-J tric service to the City of Winfield, a relationship we enjoy and hope wjll
, continue into the future. ' However, alrost all utilities have encountered a variety of difficulties in maintaining and increasin; service in recent years. I'n sure m ny of.
these difficulties are not unknown to your city utility. One result has been that we are not able to recover the full cost of service under present v
- rates. , To help us overcome these difficulties, we are requesting an orpertunity to > discuss with you a new wholesale contract. We hope to be able to negotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and t.e are anxious to begin discussions if the city approves of doing so. So discussions can begin, ve must reluctantly give notice of ternination. A formal notice of termination of the existing contract is enclosed.
Our hope is to begin discussions at a time convenient for you and with a mutual objective of continuing service with no interruption after the current ,
; \ agreement expires.
Similar notices are being sent to other involved generating municipals and to rural electric cooperatives as individual contracts make it appropriate. We appreciate the opportunity to be serving you now and we will look-for-ward to working out a mutually satisfactory aareement about future service. We want to continue to serve Winfield and we hope you will continue to find
' KG4E is an economical source of electric power. Please let me know when '
you would like to discuss a new agreement. 1 Sincerely, i i DENNIS EVANS I DE/vr Enclosure cc - Messrs Al Guiet. City Manager John Elder Director of Electric Departnent
=
- B.9-6 l o
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
'4.Y
- tay 3,1973 I
City of Winficid, a municipal corporat, ton
~
Attention: The Honorable Newton Richardson, Mayor City of Winfield Winfield, Kansas 67156 7 Gentlemen: In accordance with ARTICLE X of the Interconnectinn Agreenent by . d and between Kansas Gas and Electric Coupany and the City of
- Winfield dated August 15, l'306, we wish to officially notify the City of Winfield that Kansas Gas and Electric Corpany intends
^ to terminate the aforementioned Interconnection Agreement effective -
June 1, 1931. , We are supplyinn this Hotice of Intent in accordance with the J tems of the Interconnection Agreement and to allow your City
^ adequate time to investigate all possible options in determining your power supply for tne future. In that regard, Kansas Gas ' and Electric Company is willing to discuss the possibility of negotiating a new Interconnection Agreement to take effect -s following the termination of ?,he current Interconnection Agreement.
Sincerely, DENNIS EVANS DE/ck , cc - Hessrs Al Guiot, City Manager , John Elder, Director of Electric Department Hessrs Harley Macklin bc - Messrs W G Mason R L Rives K D Lunt W X Woolery Ralph Fiebach Wilson Cadman Jim Lucas G L Koester Bill Whitner Ralph Foster W B Walker - John Hansberry G W Evans Howard Hansen Berntrd Ruddick a -
Y B.9-7 bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach Bill Whitmer Wilson Cadman S M Haden G L Koester Ralph Foster W 8 Walker G W Evans Howard Hansen May 3, 1978 John Hansberry R E Phillips Bernard Ruddick . Harley Macklin R L Rives W K Woolery Jim Lucas
- The Honorable Floyd A Lewis ,
Mayor of Burlington Burlington, Kansas 66839
Dear Mayor Lewis:
During the past 8 years, Kansas Gas and Electric Company has provided elec-tric service to the City of Burlington, a relationship we enjoy and hope - will continue into the future. , , However, almost all utilities have encountered a variety of difficultips in maintaining and increasing service in recent years. I'm sure many of these difficulties are not unknown to your city utility. One result has been that we are not able to recover the full cost of service under present rates. . To help us overcome these difficulties, we are requesting an opportunity to discuss with you a new wholesale contract. We hope to be able to negotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious to begin discussions if the city approves of doina so. So discussions can begin, we must reluctantly give notice of termination. A formal notice of temination of the existing contract is enclosed. Our hope is to begin discussions at a time convenient for you and with a mutual objective of continuing service with no interruption after the current agreement expires. Similar notices are being sent to other involved generating nunicipals and . to rural electric cooperatives as individual contracts make it appropriate. We appreciate the opportunity to be serving you now and we will look for-ward to working out a mutually satisfactory agreeinent about future service. We want.to continue to serve Burlington and we hope ynu will continue to find KG&E is an economical source of electric power. Please let me know when you would like to discuss a new agreement. Sincerely, , DE/vr Enclosure cc - Mr Marion Logan, City Clerk
B.9-8 bc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach Dill Whitmer Wilson Cadman S M Haden G L Koester Ralph Foster W B Walker G W Evans Howard Hansen May 3, 1978 John Hansberry R E Phillips Bernard Ruddick . Harley Macklin - R L Rives W K Woolery Jim Lucas - The Honorable Floyd A Lewis A Mayor of Burlington Burlington, Kansas 66839
Dear Mayor Lewis:
During the past 8 years, Kansas Gas and Electric Company has provided elec-tric service to the City of Burlington, a relationship we enjoy and hope - will continue into the future. , , However, almost all utilities have encountered a variety of difficultips in maintaining and increasing service in recent years. I'm sure many of these difficulties are not unknown to your city utility. One result has been that we are not able to recover the full cost of service under present
, rates.
To help us overcone these difficulties, we are requesting an opportunity to discuss with you 3 new wholesale contract. We hope to be able to negotiate
@ a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious to begin discussions if the city approves of doina so. Se discussions can begin, we must reluctantly give notice of termination. A formal notice of tennination of the existing contract is enclosed.
Our hope is to begin discussions at a time convenient for you and with a mutual objective of continuing service with no interruption after the current agreement expires. Similar notices are beina sent to other involved generating municipals and to rural electric cooperatives as individual contracts make it appropriate. We appreciate the opportunity to be serving you now and we will look for-ward to working out a mutually satisfactory agree:nent about future service. We want to continue to serve Burlington and we hope you will continue to find
- KG&E is an economical source of electric power. Please let me know when you would like to discuss a new agreement.
Sincerely, , DE/vr Enclosure cc - Mr Marion Logan, City Clerk
l B.9-9 FOR Al)DITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL-tiax lladen Regional !!ana;;er-Fort Scott KG6E, The Electric Company 223-4000 May 3, 1978 Kansas Gas and Electric Company today asked the City of Burlington to open negotiations on a new wholesale service contract af ter giving notice of termina-78 "d tion under the terms of the contract.
"We want to continue to serve Burlington and we hope you will continue to find KG6E is an economical source of electric power," Dennis Evans, vice president of the electric company, told Burlington Mayor Floyd Lewis.
But, Evans said, "We are not able to recover the full cost of service under present rates so we reluctantly must give notice of termination." The termination cannot take place until December 1,1980, according to the i j contract. Evans said. The agreement requires that either KG6E or the city give g,(x) the other at least 30 months' notice before termination. KG6E also plans to terminate similar agreements with other municipal electric systems with generating capability and rural electric cooperatives as contracts permit. Evans explained that because of rates permitted under the present contracts, KG6E has not been able to earn a fair and reasonable return on electricity sold
, to its wholesale customers. "We hope to be able to negotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious to begin discussions if the city approves of doing so," he said. \
i a- - B.9-lO FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL: Kenneth Lunt Division Manager-Arkansas City KC&E, The Electric Company 4i.2-3200 , May 4, 1978 Kansas Gas and Electric Company today asked the City of Winfield to open (y^, . negotiations on a new wholesale service contract af ter giving notice of termina-tion under the terms of the contract.
"We want to continue to serve Winfield and we hope you will continue to find KC&E is an econonical source of electric power," Dennis Evans, vice president of the electric company, told Winfield Mayor Newton Richardson.
But, Evans said, "We are not able to recever the full cost of service under present rates so we reluctantly must give notice of termination." The termination cannot take place until June 1,1981, according to the contract, Evans said. The agreement requires that either KG&E or the city give the other at least 30 months' notice before termination. KG&E also plans to terminate similar agreements with other municipal electric systems with generating capability and rural electric cooperatives-as contracts permit. Evans explained that because of rates permitted under the present contracts, KG&E has not been able to earn a f air and reasonable return on electricity sold to its wholesale customers.
"We hope to be able to negotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious to begin discussions if the city appro.ves of doing so," he said.
B.9-11 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CALL: , Kenneth Lunt : Division ibnager-Arkansas City KG&E, The . Electric Company 442-3200 - 4 May 4, 1978 Kansas Gas and Electric Company today asked the City of Wellington to open negotiations on a new wholesale service contract af ter giving notice of termina-tion under the terms of the contract. l "We want to continue to serve Wellington and we hope you.will continue to find 1 KG6E is an economical source of electric power," Dennis' Evans, vice president of the electric company, told Wellington Mayor Gordon Tackett. But, Evans said, "We are not able to recover the full cost of service under
- present rates so we reluctantly must give notice of termination."
The termination cannot take place until June 1, 1981, according to the () contract, Evans said. The agreement requires that either KG&E or the city give the other at least 36 months' notice before termination. KC&E also plans to terminate similar agreements with other municipal electric systems with generating capability and rural electric cooperatives as contracts permit. Evans explained that because of rates permitted under the present contracts, KG&E has not been able to earn a fair and reasonable return on electricity sold to its wholesale customers.
"We hope 'to be abic to negotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious to begin discussions if the city approves of .doing so," he said.
f 5
e *- B.9-12 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Joe Cumiskey Division Manager-Pittsburg KG&E, The Electric Company 231-4000 - May 4, 1978
, Kansas Gas and Electric Company today asked the City of Girard to open negotiations on a new wholesale service contract af ter giving notice of termina-O \~~/ tion under the terms of the contract. "We want to contin'se to serve Girard and we hope you will continue to find KG&E is an economical source of electric power," Dennis Evans, vice president of the electric company, told Girard Mayor Nicki Neil. l But, Evans said, "We are not able to recover the full cost of service under present rates so we reluctantly must give notice of termination." ,
The termination cannot take place until July 1, 1981, according to the contract, Evans said. The agreement requires thac either KG&E or the city give () the other at least 30 months' notice before termination. KG&E also plans to terminate similar agreements with other municipal electric systems with generating capability and rural electric cooperatives as ~l l contracts permit. Evans explained that because of rates permitted under the present contracts, KG6E has not been able to earn a fair cnd reasonable return on electricity sold to its wholesale customers.
"We hope to be able to negotiate a new contract that is fair and equitable to all parties and we are anxious to begin discussions if the city approves of doing so," he said.
l l
es , o . . , .t/ I roen eerp ese.s.or h.fV r B.10-1 INTEROFFICE CO R R ESPON D EN C E ,
,s To. Mr G K ster Daft. Augyst 0, 1977 Evenci, Service to New Strawn o.
After a careful review, we believe that the most economical and expedient way to provide service to New Strawn would be to tap our 13.8 KV construction loop at Wolf Creek and run about 4.9 miles of new 13.8 KV line. As near as we can determine, there is adequate capacity in the construction loop for this additional load. The tap would be made at the northwest edge of the project where the construction loop goes overhead. The line would run north approximately parallel to our 345 KV line to the Sharpe road. From there it would run due west to liighway 75, thence south to New Strawn. As near as we can determine, it appears that most, and possibly all, of the new line can O eit ner be on our property or the public right-of-way. At approximately the point of tapping the construction loop, a 50 ampere recloser would be installed. At New Strawn, a 4-step voltage regulator would be provided to reduce voltage to 12.5 Kv, the present distribution voltage in New Strawn. Our estimate for the total job as described is $96,000. - .. __. I d ' M This figure does not include anything for distribution O within New Strawn. c
,. , . "a ry',
- ),Mo .;hd/
C$'. .:.'i ' d ' i - t _a
- JHHansberry/ey
-'[e . . . . . ,_, l . . w. ..m ,
e I
.i ~~b*#-- .
cc - Messrs W Cadman ' ' i l .' " " '
. . '.e ?
B Ruddick !
. J Arterburn M lladen ,
R McCalmont h *
- t k-J Lucas r ,.!
' , ', ' L Gunter , . . . . . ' * . ,1. . , .
I l I ,
, '.y . ~. ,_
f
B.10-2
- bL , *'
, .1 '. /,(
do,w-lllbvsof .
.a._,.....
9?af,4/u h e< 6 h O') <,..n....... \ nostaf A VOMS naNsas Cas AND CLECT.iC susLD4NG
" " = a sox moe. wicnir*, **=sas errei o , "f ' ',*a ,*,',",* " *'"Co*.*,U . .o September 2, 1977 O.-
Mr. Dennis Evans Vice President Customer and Community Services Kansas Gas and Electric Company
Dear Dennis:
I have gotten tied up this morning but wanted to advise you of my conversation with Dennis Roth yesterday afternoon. Dennis repeatedly stated that because of the REA attitude toward electric service to be supplied to a mobile home park in or near New Strawn, the city fathers were extremely upset and wanted to oust the REC from serving the city. ("'N Apparently the REC does not have a franchise agreement with the city, and Dennis simply wanted to advise that they were going to attempt to terminate whatever rights the REC has and would request service from KG&E (or perhaps KP&L) . I stated that it appeared to be more of a company matter than a legal matter insofar as KG&E was concerned; that I new of an ongoing legal matter with the REC and that for company reasons the New Strawn matter should be reviewed by the company in light of the other pending matters. I also advised that I was completely unaware as to d the impact that the Territorial Bill may have on prospective service by KG&E. Our conversation concluded with me saying that either yourself or Mr. Cadman would be in contact. Yours truly, Rober A. Vohs RAV/jc
B.10-3 i
/! i i
New Strawn, Kan'sas September 7, 1977 j Kansas Gas & Electric Company ([)" P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Attn: Dennis Evans Gentlemen: The Governing Body of the City of New Strawn, Coffey County, Kansas is desirous of soliciting, negotiating and granting a franchise to a public utility for furnishing electric power to its citizens. Please contact me at your convenience forthe purpose of making an appointment to discuss a franchise agreement. The Governing Body of the City of New Strawn meets at reg-(ag ular monthly meetings the first Thursday of each month at 7:30 P.M. at the office of Boyce Real Estate and Insurance in the City of New Strawn, Kansas. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, se ' ri 7
-rss-OEls'H. Con 7, Mayor I
{
~
B.lO-4 September 16,1977 l l 1 l l
^.
The Honorable Otis H Jones Mayor City of New Strawn Hew Strawn, Kansas 66839
Dear Mayor Jones:
Thank you for your letter of September 7th indicatino the intent of the City of New Strawn to seek a public utility to furnish electric power to its citizens. During our telephone conversation this morning, you asked if we could meet with you on Thursday evening September 22, at 8 pm. We will be most happy to do so. Mr Max Haden, regional manager for the area, and Mr William Woolery from our Gt:.neral Office will be with me so that we can visit about the various aspects of t providing electric service to your community. Sincerely, DE/vr cc - Messrs Fred B Adam, SCC S M Haden W X Woolery bc - Messrs W K Cadman Ralph Foster
s.10-5 Mr Wilson K Cadman October 7,1r77
-s At our meeting with the New Strawn City Council last night with 11r Lyle Herriott in attendance, it was learned that a merger is being contemplated by the Kaw Valley Electric Cooperative and l Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative. . Apparently, the merger plan is to be subuitted to the cooperative Boards of Directors and/or members within the next month to six weeks.
l n i I DE/vr cc - Messrs Ralph Fiebach Ralph Foster Robert L Rives .
B.10-6 h/ October 7,1977 The Honorable Utis H Jones layor City of New Strawn i;ew Strawn, Kansas 66839
Dear llayor Jones:
Thank you for inviting us to visit with you and the New Strawn Council regarding possibilities of providing electric service to your connunity. If any additional questions arise, please don't hesitate to contact us. We will do our best to provide the answers, m ' Sincerely, DE/vr cc - Mr Frec B Adant, Director, KCC . be - Messrs Wilson K Cadman S M Haden W X Woolery Ralph Foster
{ N:tice To Residente of New Str wa i Def e #3 le a niceting Ort. 20th et A:on p.ni, at the UrsJe Schaal in New Stan=a to di* cues the Fran. thlce of elecideggy and reasoes for jl doing it. (/ Otto Josee
. ~, .c I;
p g,h B.lO-7 d - - l o -l1 A 1 - i New Strawn Alert $ I If you reside or plan to reside in New Strawn-Here are somo facts you should l consider beforo the City Council finally selects your electrical power supplier. c:n
" i ) Compare Quality & Speed Of Service: -
4 C0FFEY COUNTY REC KGE
)iy j = Colley County REC's Offices are
- KGE's closest Serviceman [1] is located in Burlington, only 5 miles located in LeRoy, 19 miles from y 1 away. New Strawn. (
1 1
- Coffey County REC has a 10 man
- KG E's closest service crew is h service crew plus full equipment to located at Humboldt,56 miles from maintain service and react to New Strawn. I emergeticles. Additional back up !
readily, available.
- Who and Where do you call in case
- of an outage or service problem?
- Cof fey County REC is a local call on .
your telephone, with phones man. L, ned 24 hours per day. 7-days per I week. Coffey County REC is always ; on duty. l ' 1
- Coffey County REC has served New -
Strawn area since the beginning of '
< the cooperativa in 1939. , ,
1 1 l Which electrical supplier can assure New Strawn quality and fast service? Your i council has selected KGE. . .Who would you select? Let your council know before or g during the next council meeting, Thursday night, Oct. 20th.This is a question too I important for just the council to decide. L f '. . . Paid for by The Co!!ey County Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Burlington. f a i
--w __ _ _ ur amw N ew.wn-w., -- A - = -- ----y WW'EhMWiM4TYAha w I 1.
r-
?.' ~
s. [q; ;)5-/721 m
o B.10-8 m poe nrr env. s.or g , INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE f $C t.5& h.GLU ' fo. Mr. Dennis Evans ) g /A/ & hs oat s. January 13, 1978
/ g [f/ Cit SUBJECT.
O Enclosed is a copy of the petition calling for a vote on the New Strawn Franchise Ordinance for yours and Mr. Foster's information. Dennis Roth felt sure there were some discrepan'cies in the signatures and possibly some question as to the legality of the form used. However, he said that he was going to recommend to the Council that they honor the petition. I $ fy D
- Max Haden/ns 5 W g JAN 1( 1973 2
--- A9ffRIIUmst - --- %LLit.01_
J :W.M-JL'Of f . __ _/ l - -- h:4.5 3 L _ v ' F.*fy:1_ Enc. icstca J.!' T..y ~~ JAW.4 . JV - JMS!!1_ JtA*utn _ JM*i1;.*;;i JMLirs _ JMstats _
*fA'-----
J.v;x< _~__w fAff y . , '[~- - - a za.,~ 2 -- . V sqg[} t 4 -,
- " . y PLTITIOd FOR POPULAR VOti:; 0:4 FRANCalISC ORDINANCC TO: The alonorablo tayor an.1 yoverssinq body of the City of tcw Strawn, Kansas We, the undersigned, buing 'more than twenty percent of Q the legally qualified voters of.the City of idow Strawn, Kansas, having voted for 14ayor of the City of i.cw Strawn, Kansas in the last preceding election, petition the city governing body to submit to popular voto, ordinance do. 77-13, entitled "AN ORDINNiCC GRAdTIaiG (O JAdSA3 CAS A.dD JLUCTRIC CO'4PAdY, A COR-PORATIOll , ITS SUCCESSORS A.30 ASSIG. 3, M dLUCTRIC LIGIIT, HEAT AND POWt:R FRMCAIISC, PRUSCRIJIJG Tais: Tu!D1S AND COdDITIONS TalrREOF AND RELATING TalERdTO, add RUPdALIdG ALL OTelGR ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDIdMCUS I.i C0dFL.ICf TdCRCWITu,' as finally passed by the governing body of tne City of dew Strawn, Kansas o.1 the 17th day of November, 1977, be subnitted for adoption or rejec-tion to popular vote, and that the Mayor, as provided by law, issue a proclamation calling a special election for such purpose.
NAME ADORMSS' blyi N %.!w.. .. !wL.4. wMw.z el Gl % $ 41. i*
?bObc .b//..$t uJ 2 ?lb l ,
au(A 24 cs.n. d. .. . % L.A A .,,J//
/
h% ekui.Lw u . 'uswLdyL 'k X ff I Q&& c. ,,,h. , . , J.1.<.s( .. (Y -bo? hsL A>jhewnwl b L!,.f k.A J,=J- *
. s .
19?Ntdf. i$Cli!4. e ') - - At h a.G. .l..$.10 " N'*l& WL
? $ a l f b. O !i d [. .... !$ m 4 .J. . - .1 0 t $ ~ l L A % 3 >,
14%p.!Jk./;p:.... .. .ll a d j. i,y %-
.- -n n.= .= =-= ==-
V. +
-2 Nw ^*?.??.?.
__l/ U- @ kJ L .m..... . .'.i.t.dg.'Edo.>.u_JLh'I Oh- uLL-.. _. .L.v.0.u..p: e a - 2 eI. rsu--- S.S.$ IV u x N.u.7 $ h.c.) k -
% a u du ..... . u g . s y /m /
kbd Cl.,I. .c.t.d...iL\7 b.. t uQ-._O, E N a#
. {l h's ! - l' 'd,;.; : - /$n n*, yY'usi .d'.l bysis.2 - $i%eL .kEYLa.- AGded.s8 > 01 L(aLeas1.-.-. 11.s.u.wsw&
o
- A r k . a ..... . .L;,.u.. 2.. x .,~ L .-
f c...L d!.. .%y%m .-..GL .cL .y L. .. h h' 4'*/ . ...
) .m L_.t.yH ili<JOgkn % sflOI d * .. .. . . . . . . Cf u ...Z w e -
zLszQwi ~ L2 ,a a A & e . -- . riaMrwa,1.uoun v .
$%AtsJE . ' L=aju.,c.d&dca Lyis y N n :$ E .!a u y .. . . Li... a L u & 2 :L'q 3'f G d g.1... _. L._.in.m.. A u. O .
GS'lc.}L:EcL.a'A-- 1ik.4 a'yli> %.1~.A.I. %yf' Wilen 1%uw .d..c ,i u. :. . .. . i. . . . .L a..& . . t.n -- . t EAI"
.e . . d . .J la .a.. - . , . , - t - Q L ' w i S f.: w E'i::..?6cGu! Gw -- .
- a. M 8
" "" " 'W-' M .
NAME ADDR4GS
~~.~; ~~ _ .-
Q" L.
. ..iA c:. >:.. . ,1.na .~v w i u .... h : u.... . // # ' d p /_ 1 2 1 2 $ f l ...._. C _ c 3 . a a n z,. il a s w f 0 Q1.4 % Q l . a :: : Yu. .ke a. 'cl.. idEY I .
B N. dilua.f g ...._.. &u -day.cnt..hg_ i n.a}>~Jhue .
-. .. .n41 ..nw .-dfwt_akap.....-..... .Z w..;dhw e # .,n '.2AL.L.Gw e.- ._. .. Eb'LRDLhhd ,
d.. u tr_. .....__. .. 4 5.v.e t. E u : w _ . n f't . J
. kr ?_kUY! .w:._ (G&ow) i.x..'. . ./: wm .ht:.wa.Jbs.r'/ /
Ap _ n _ e . , g A llend ..
... ... _ /. L . . ; & .... u M m .. .. u m
- 6. / 7 n__,. su. c . L 'l
. i. , ~'L .. %.. .y , .6 ( 5'3f , $cwl 9.k. . ). u.w.. .b. .b. M.- t .$...w...._.N.u_. . .. %m -
MM, 91 (. .>);.t_[4 f' OrL- ds .ff.. f.\.i... f...u.. .l a gL 4,e .. f : Y.:tt} .M. _! .{.' . . Y .s 1 3.0 .' && *' W k '
. Ln'- . , . . s.L t . . . . . . . . j$ss s. Ytss.'1*.)$<::'/llf_
t ._ ..... ......... .. . .... .. .... ....... _ ...._ t l
" O** * '[ h# 9g ,,
i
B.lO-9
~*
copy to S M Haden 1/20/78
- W $\
9Lja E n N , g'in maLPH rostEn (3so) as 3.oise o u Las a RaffoN P O DOX 208 WICH8TA, MANSAS 67208 JoMN J. HEALIER me T o at gem January 19, 1978 /' )
? .
44h
\\ ,/ ;: . ?; , , j' *b-
Mr. Dennis Evans /f Vice President Customer and '/,")#'"Q:f g,, '/ pf
,f Community Services :l f , , /',/
Kansas Gas and Electric Co. Ii' S ',e P. O. Box 208 ,/'7 3 /,' / Wichita, Kansas 67201 ,,/ / v
Dear Mr. Evans:
p I reviewed the Petition for referendum in the New Strawn franchise and find the Petition to be valid. I am not informed as to the voters last voting in the election for mayor of the city nor the validity of the signatures or addresses; but as to the text of the Petition, in my opinion it is valid. Very truly yours, j] Ralph Foster l RF/jc l
#7241 l
l
l .. i ^
/ av1hdb' ' * ' .. . o e */ .,,.,../ ' )
- )
February 3, 1978 m The Honorable Otis H Jones Mayor City of New Strawn New Strawn, Kansas 66839
Dear Mayor Jones:
We understand that a referendum will be held to determine the future of electric service to the citizens of New Strawn. We feel it is important to call ~ the following information to your attention. Kansas law includes a statute KSA 25-1709 commonly referred to as the Corrupt Practices Act. A copy is attached for your infor-mation. Generally speakinq, this statute makes it illegal for certain corporations and stockholders to influence or affect the vote on questions submitted to voters. It is our understanding the statute applies to both power suppliers that will be considered by the citizens of New Strawn. This is to advise you that K%E will adhere strictly to the letter of the law, will not and cannot take any action, previous to the election when held, to influence its outcone. Ne would expect the Coffey County Cooperative to act accordingly. Please contact me should you have further qaestions in this regard. Sincerely, DE/vr Attach cc - Mr Dennis Roth, City Attorney City of New Strawn bc - Executive Group S M Haden J 0 Arterburn
. B.10-ll Tt L %,PMO N E 3 6 4* S L ,3 gV LLlaM A. BUCE Lte JENNie D.ROTH BUCKLES & ROTH ATT O R N EY S *AT* LAW I, /f , 'j[
IDI SOUTH 4TH
- P. O. Som 2 0 6 , e* ,/
GURLINGTON, KANS AS 66039 !
- h y f w ; ? ,'*u.
FeDruary 6, 1978 97 3 f [.' j ,', :,' ,g WI FEC i I?l3 U (()y['& y . v '. . : . . . . . . . . u.. IIonorable Otis Jones Mayor of New Strawn h"fd 1 .'
,,/ ~
66839 (pk
, ilew Strawn, Esnsas ?jf _ .f Mr. Dennis Evans * ~ ,e Kansas Gas & Electric Co. ~ ~ ~
P.O. Box 200 's 201 H. Itarket i~ Wichita, Kansas 67201 b ,.' l Mr. Max Hayden . 1 Kansas Gas & Electric Co. -
~ '
Box 111 Fort Scott, Kansas G6701
^
Honorable Jack Scott
,l County Election Officer
- Coffey County Courthouac Burlinc., ton, Kansas 66339 Mr. Lyle Herriott Coffey County nural Electric Co-op North 4th Durlington, Kansas 66839 l
RE: Petition to call to a l voto franchiso ordinance
Dear Concerned:
A formal petition to call to an election the franchise ordinance No. 77-13 has been received with an excess of 20% l of the legally qualified voters as required by K.S.A. 12-2001 l et seq. The petition has been examined by the City Clerk, ! Coffey County Election Officer and myself as City Attorney, ! and find that althourJh the petition is deficient in savoral ! areas in that the same does not contain several statutory I clauses as required, that the obvious intant of the petitioners
i .?. February 6,1978 Page 2 is clear and the petition complies with the spirit of such
. statutes that govern this matter. Therefore the same is approved by this office.
The next steps, as required by K.S.A. 12-2001 et. seq. and the applicable special question election laws are
- 1. That the grantee of tne franchise (KG&E) pay to the City Troasurer of New Strawn such sums as are required to pay for the election.
- 2. Upon receipt of the same the llayor shall issue a proclamation calling the election. (This in
' effect is notice to County Election Officer of the intended date of the election, who shall proceed with publishing of the proclamation.)
2a. The proclamation shall contain: (1) The purpose for which the election is
-- called.
(2) Sat out the franchino ordinance in full. (3) The proclamation shall be published i three (3) consocutive wooks in the official city j newspapor, dio last publication of which shall i, vs not less than thirty (30) days prior to the
! election.
1 l (4) The proclamation could be combined with
'l, the statutory notice of the~ spacial cloction
- which should contain the proposition to be sub-mitted.
{ l 4 g (5) Preparation of ballots, appointment of judges and clerks. l i (6) Preparation of :,otices'in rogdrd to the f1 , retf stration books. i l g e (7) All other matters required by statute on
- t. spocial question elections.
, g/ The County Election Officer, Jack Scott, estimates that cost of the election will be $250.00. Upon receipt of nonies ~
k _-.h;:.
I l February 6,1978 Page 3 I
" from KG&E, the proclamation calling the election will issue.
If the proposition at election carrios, the franchise l
, ordinance is granted. If the proposition is not carried the ;
franchise is ipso facto, null and void. 1 If you have any questions please advise. i very truly yours, f i DUCKLES & ROTIl By: Dennis D. Roth 1 DDR:mn f l l I i i t e I
- ~
p i , s*
*O
B.10-12 2/8/78 - copies to Messrs Ralph Foster ' W B Walker No-Ray Tate A, /- 7 19 7f m Rzczivsn raon9//,<.//2., e ,. # s x A.-r Lxa. Av2u.>..cd. 'E? notunag b*$/$bd %A S nr5/ kr{edsx, Q Wb'e'E w $ ./ Acceent Total 8 Assount Paid 8 )4 [ 2(/4t Th A D,J $/,a sana.c. o.. s ._
!a m < / %E EFFICIENCYg LINE*
I e
B.10-13
, y.:/ y. '".
fuw' y ... w. w
/; . 7, us.mn. 4. .u=co unse o. n asee i
I dp, j [e 3 ....un Cydiyf , 5 BUCKLES & ROTH o ArvonnavS.Ai t.Aw P2 IILCOVED w ici sauva 4 w . s=. o. s o m aos ouauworoN. $(ANSAS G6839 j. y gg
. dannawam e
February 28, 1978 0 i 1_.su_ CAD M m _. - Tt$$?oI- '
- _. rce .
lg , __ iraita .- Kansas Gas & Electric 4) - 'g,,{!f'_ - 201 North Market - Box 208, Wichita, Kansas 67201 N h T. ru _ .
-desy*,, ",- ~
G ' ,n7,,f,",},, u.cun C
'h 'rj Attention: Dennis Evans,I.cc President h . . . _ re v. ar ____
h _._5iss~._.-
.___w a . _ _
Coffey County Rural Electric Corporation t gp-ah,a. C North Fourth __ Burlington, Kansas 66839 _ __as Att-eL cion : Ly}c Herriott -
' Wlf. p .
l -- Mr. L. R. Hannen Honorable Otis H. Jones--" Attorney at Law Mayor, New Strawn
! 100 N 3rd New Strawn, Kansas 66939 Burlington, Kansas 66839 L
Kansas Corporation Commission Mr. Phillip M.. Fromme . County. Attorney , State Office Building Coffey County Courthouse Topeka, Kansas 66625 Burlington, Kansas 66839 Attention: Fred Adams I RE: New Strawn Electric Franchise i . Gentlemen: . l In light of the fact that a franchise ordinance , to Kansas Gas & Electric is now upon petition being submitted to the citizens of New Strawn by special election March 28, 1978, and upon request by the o governing body of New Strawn, I take this opportunity to call to your attention certain laws regulating the conduct of interested parties to this election. K.S.A. 25-1709 provides:
"No corporation carrying on the business -
3 of a bank, trust, purety, indemnity, safe 3 _ l
. j February 28, 1978 Page 2 deposit, insurance, railroad, street railway , telegraph , telephone, gas, electric light, heat, power, or water <
company, or any c6mpany having the right to take or condemn land or to exercise
. franchises in pub 1ic ways granted by the state or by any c,ounty or city , and no trustee or trustees owning or holding the mpjority of the stock of such corpora-tion,'shall pay or contribute in order to aid, promote or prevent the nomination or election of any person toipublic office, or in order to aid, promdte or antagonize the interests of any poli'tical party or to influence or affect the vote on any question submitted to thy voters. No person shall solicit or receive such payment or contribution from such cor-poration or such holders'of stock."
In my opinion t.he word contribute is to be inter-proted in a broad manner and would , encompass non-monetary efforts through agents, employees etc. The [*h Kansas Supreme Court in State, exrel Morgan vs. City of Newton,138 K. 78, 23P2d. 463, hah ruled that the forerunner of this statute applies to municipal franchise elections. . The penalty .for violation is contained in K.S.A. 25-1710 and provides: 1 "Any corporation which violates any of the l provis' ions of this act shall, upon convic-l tion be punished by a fine of not more l than Ten Thousand Dollars , and any of ficer, l director or agent of a cprporation violating any of the provisions of this act, or who authorize such violation, or any person, who - violates, or in any way knowingly aids or abets the violation of any of the provisions . of this act, shall, upon conviction, be I punished by a fine of not more than One l Thousand Dollars." It is manifestly clear that the people are to choose and decido election issues free from self-vested propaganda and acts. Any conduct falling within the ., 4 n
. J' February 28, 1978 Page 3 e purview of these statutes will be forwarded to the County Attorney for prosec,ution e Very truly yours,
, ' BUCKLES & ROTH By:k . J c.-s. a3 -
Dennis D. Roth DDR:mn 4 C e e e
,1
e wa t B.10-1.4 I
.~ re , . ., ),1 ' . i. .. s ' s . .
o 14
- e. KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
- b P.O. Bou 208 Wichots. Kansas 6720I sm uscresc emowv
. KHLKO-204 TE-30007 MrGlynf(bKoester March 20, 1978 Wolf Creek Temporary Construction Trailer Electric Service M.
W ' l J m Please find attached the minutes of an impromptu meeting regarding the applicability of the State v Corporation comission State of Kansas " Wire Stringing Rules" to the proposed electric service p for the construction trailers. a DLMitcheWash Attach C'JSr. r, cauM. o Sr.nv DLFT. cc-Messrs R V McCalmont ip RECElVLD 8 J o Arterb m y !AAR 21 1978 5 M L Johnson d E D Tarver mi:ws.N _ J H Hansberry - Q.${[,'; B N Ruddick Jwtti R B Foster d[.pf- j Meeting Attendses Jos.ita y . :.m:.s _ J; '.'.C . J.* I . . _6 ;i.s10 J.1:.r. Le i f.' .2T?.0 'E J r.LUTS J .e.yi'IFi j'!".. %s RJE3 PJ*.D.;K - _ 1A*E av v. _WCC' ..Y _ l - - -_ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Minutes of the March 17, 1978 Mee ting on hporary Trailer Electric Service Attendees : Messrs G J Benson d$db J M Pippin Nbe . D L Mitchem F A Saint G L Snider D Stratton* G L Koester* Mrs V' L Ridgeway
*Part-time The discussion was initiated to investigate the necessity of making an EL application to the Kansas Corporation Commission or notice of construction for proposed electric service lines crossing under the Coffey County REC 69 kv line.
jemg Mr Douglas Stratton's legal opinion was that an EL was not required for service to KG&E loads on KG&E property per the limited certificate (Docket No. 107,167-U). However, if the City of New Strawn grants KG&E a franchise and the 13.8 kv substation is used for retail service to New Strawn, the present limited certification will have to be superseded. Also, in the event a portion of the 13.8 kv line serving the trailers is utilized in serving New Strawn, an EL application will becore necessary at that time. Based on Mr Stratton's opinion, the installation of service to the l trailers will proceed as scheduled with routing governed by engineering and economic considerations. 1 . d+n ( DLMitchem/ ash e c -- -- , e , +-w - -- -~r - --
B.10-15 EXECUTIVE GROUP March 29,1978
- r.
We have been advised that the referendum in New Strawn for a franchise with Kansas Gas and Electric Company has passed favorably -- 73-51. l s% l l DE/vr l 1 1 l l t 1
. ~~.
e-eoem urr say.s.or B.10-16 e INTEROFFICE CO R RESPON D ENC E hj,,.v v Ns # ,c.k ) () / Ad to. Mrs, na Ridgeway OAT E. April 3, 1978
$UBJECTs Attached are rate charts which were used for reference purposes only at the New Strawn Town Meeting of October 20, 1977.
l I had only one or possibly two questions at the Town Meeting relative to rates, and one question at the second reading of the franchise on November 3, 1977, at which time I referred to these charts. MaxIladen/ns l Attach. 1 l I l r. i.
,v
B.lo-17
. o <
t Meeting held April 28, 1978 - Second Floor Conference Room
Subject:
Necessary steps to take to have service available to New Strawn by June 1,1978. Attending: W B Walker Dennis Evans Bernard Ruddick Max Haden Jack Skelton Vern Middlebusher O. . ' Melvin Ayers Gary Benson - Bob Scriven Verna Ridgeway W B Walker presided. Approximately 200 customers. What has to be done and who will do it?
- 1. Customer Accounts. We would prefer that the Coffey County REC will read their meters the date of transfer, bill their kwh's. KG&E will start from that point. Main contact people with REC will be determined by Dennis Evans and Max Haden. Cooperative should make their refund of deposits; KG&E will request deposits; Cooperative to be responsible l\ for any accounts due, miscellaneous items, etc.
Quite a few sub-meters; no demand meters noticed by Benson; some ' hi419hters metered. One customer presently served by REC does not show on platted map as outside the platted area -- The cooperative can pick up that customer by building 1/4 to 1/2 mile of line. i
- 2. Will we get signed contract from customer? Yes. Representative will get enough information so as to be able to assign a rate, along with customer's address and any other necessary information.
- 3. Customer Deposits. Will attempt to get a deposit from transients (mobile homes). Standard procedure on other residential customers --
no deposit to start with unless pay practice deteriorates.
- 4. First bill should be for no more than 30 days -- part month bill if necessary.
Meters: KG&E able to handle 4 and 5-dial meters. Can handle 3-dial t meter manually. Some meters are digital. Will remove existing meters l and replace with KG&E meters. Try to buy meter in place; then schedule for maintenance, etc. Good meters will be put back into service. If REC wants to buy back meters, KG&E will se'l.
- 5. We need to know the cost of doing all of this work - expense-wise.
Account suffix will be assigned for employees use in accounting for time, expenses, etc. (See Skelton's letter -f May 1,1978.) WAs will
- be prepared; one for getting line t i .he city and the other for work inside the city limits.
, 2- -2 l
l J KG&E will take,over transforwers.
~
- 6. Responsibility for negotiating for going on US Hwy 75. If REC will l 1et us attach, we will; otherwise will go to KCC.
- 7. How will we get a price?
FERC Rules -- Make original cost from books of Cooperative. Walker: Take inventory, age it best we can, price it on average use. FERC system -- it would be okay. Accounting must be approved by FERC. g]g 8. Try to get from REC.
- 1. Hi-lighter ownership -- Any type of customer information available.
- 2. UG routing and size and ddtermine if conduit or no conduit.
- 3. Try to get maps.
- 4. Pad-mount transformer size.
- 5. Who owns pads? Assume REC does.
- 9. Meter Department will make field inventory of all raters.
- 10. Where will New Strawn customers pay electric service bills? Try to arrange for a bank to take payments. If bank not agreeable, bills will have to be mailed to office in Fort Scott.
- 11. No street signs -- nor any street lights.
Advances for construction - handling would be questionable, but might pick
,- up on our own system.
Assign meter book number, Earning Point number (27) and billing district (meter readings date). Joint pole use agreement - United inside? - SWB outside? - Does present agreement cover new area? Jack Skelton, Acting Secretary cc - Mr R L Rives 1
- e. </ e wrr MEMO eMrI'"'h-28-78 RAScriv:n
[i/L , , d,
- Walker presided meeting on taking over New Strawn.
He recommended that we read the meters June 1st for starting our own billing. . They would bill up to dune 1st, refund their own. deposits, and collect their own arrears. . Ad/vances for Constniction - handling would be questionable,3ut might pick them up on our own system.
- Benson said there are lots of sub-meters, no demands that he knew of, lots of metered Hi-Lighters and maybe 19 unmetered HLs. ,1 customer outside area, od lake road, served f rom city circuit would probably be served by REC via their new line to be constructed.
City could annex, but reportedly would not while present owner is there. Preferable to hund attach to their poles, rather than building over Q -' them. Get signed' contracts and rate infomation via FS personnel.
- Get depnsits on mobile homes, but let others go until needed.
Initial bill should be less than 30-days. Iots of Will change out maters / enclosures as soon as posnible. cycloseter tyre. Charge $86.1 and special suffix. Possibly have contractors build the newline; sers rate WA for this. Another WA for reconstruction in city. Questionable inventory on UG routing /conduf.f/ size. Maps?
- Have Foster draf t letter to a sk for Maps, etc.
Need size, data on pad-mount transformers - inside locked vaults. Middlebusher will get meter inventory. For billing, can best handle h and 5 dial meters, no cumulative demands. Need some type of company meter number on New Scxvice Orders. However, can somehow Street addresses and numbers would be good. handle exceptions - via Computer-Manual or Hanual billing, Haden said he would offer up to $25 per month for Bank to handle p payment of bills. Else, custcmers could mail to Fort Scott. Emphasis was that we needed to be in a position to take over on June 1st, a'Ithough various delays may be encountered. Anticipated that negotiating the price wou}d not delay the take over date, but if REG contests certain other things could delay take over. Attended: W. B. Walker, Max Haden, Vama Ridgeway, Dennis Evans, Melvin Ayers, Rob Scriven, j Vern Middlebusher, ,,.<./t./ Narney Ruddick. - Gary Bensoy,,Me M h-28-7810 am, 2nd floor conference Room O O O 9 e
a Requirements of KG&E Relative to the tf j.s Acquisition of the Electrical Facilities Owned by the Coffey County REC Serving - , j/" b/d the Town of New Strawn April 27, 1978 , [I'
~ i ttL.
go 's I'll~'}} h'\ . Aged Field Inventory by KG6E Retirement Units g fyf e/r' s Anticipated accounts affected: ~j) f; Distribuiton: Ace't 364 - Poles 365 - Conductor 366.3 - U.G. Conduit 367.3.- U.G. Conductor 369.1 - Overhead Services 369.3 - U.G. Services _( 370[2} Meter Devices 373.1 - Public Street Lighting 373.2 - Private Street Lighting Field Inventory by Name Plate Data Distribution: Ace't 368.11 - Line Transformers Field Inventory by KG&E Retirement Units Distrioution: Ace't 368.12 - Cutouts and Arresters Field Inventery of Meters - Y.;'r J. t. Distribution: Ace't 370.1 - Meters, each, by name plate
' data. These should be aged by some method.
9 'n. 2 OCb!at J.L Maps of the area should be provided to Plant Accounting and Engineering for record purposes. s l i A revenue work authorization should be issued against budget f ' item 78-301 for connecting KG&E system into the New Strawn system and will provide a vehicle for assigning transformer station numbers and l I any other identifying numbers. i The cctual purchase of the New Strawn system will, as is customary, be recorded in KG&E records via journal entry 90. O
i B.10-18 ronu urr ses.e.sr Jf p INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE t F,V~V 7L ,4
,/
fo, Mr. S Haden
/
oar t, 1, 1978 susact, Time and expenses of personnel while establishing service Q and customer records in New Strawn are to use the .X9 suffix to the applicable account being charged. For example: 17-903.09 - securing service contracts, mailing addresses, determining customers deposits, preparation of computer transactions, etc., 17-586.29 - securing meter information, 17-588.09 - T & D maps and records, 17-908.09 - customer assistance expenses. The "9" is always shown in the 2nd position to the right of the decimal place; and ,it cannot be used with any 800 clearing SCcounts. If you encounter other accounts that you feel may be applicable, please call me before using them. I would expect the use' of the "9" suffix to cease from one to two months after electric service starts. CUST.&COVM' gy SU,v.ttpr' PLCElva g
. y NAY : 1978 s JS/cs ,,,,,, ~Bft I!L*,$ _ _ 'p cc: Messrs. /D Evans R V Middlebusher Zry,)ll'y /
R V McCalmont ar ? t. V' W B Walker R Rives M Ayers Njf B Ruddick G Benson jfj{m-yy, E D Prothro I Willits' JM3ft.t 8440Klte _ J0.'.fA *E -
*n:t8; J?NSTAFF J :0 3 YAY-30s _
- At k 1_
C:s t W-V vt .
.)
~ . B.lo-19 - May 1, 1978 t . . . x l
(}... Mr Lyle Herriott, Manager l Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc P O Box 229 Bu'.lington, Kansas 66839
Dear Mr'Herriott:
In connection with our plans _ to serve the City of New Strawn, it is of course necessary that we make an offer to you for the physical facilities you own that exist within the city limits of New Strawn. To be as accurate as possible, we need to know all information that is available regarding distribution facilities, services, meters,
/**s '
etc. Would you please give us information uhtch you have available which would facilitate calculations necessary to make this determi-naticn. We would also appreciate having the customer infonnation which is available that would relate customers' addresses, meter numbers and transformers. We would like to have this information just as soon as possible >
- in order'to complete our ' calculations. . .,. Sincerely, DE/vr-bc - Messrs Wilson K Cadman I. G L Koester Bernard Ruddick John Hansberry .
S H Haden Ralph Foster Jack Skelton 4
- ,-.- -+ -r , - - + , - - - - - - * - - - . ~ - - - - - - - , . , -- - - , - - - -
B.lO-20 Mr G L Koester , May 1, 1978 c.
<w. .
As you know the franchise date for our providing service to the - iCity of New Strawn is June 1 ,1978. The Fort Scott Division has been working to complete plans for building a line from Wolf Creek Substation to the edge of the City. The EL Application for this project has not been submitted as we did not have a Certificate of Convenience and Authority to serve New Strawn. The Certificate had not been submitted due to lack of the legal description of New Strawn which has now been provided to the Engineering Department. In the meeting held on Friday, April 28, the information necessary for accounting purposes and plans to complete service to New Strawn were discussed. We reviewed the need to be prepared to serve New Strawn by June 1, even if the job needs to be contracted. We have officially requested certain infonnation from the Coffey p County REC in order to be accurate in our analysis of their system ' within the city limits. If they fail to provide the.information to us, we will estimate certain items, such as length of services and age of equipment. 5 l ] 4 . , .. . , ',2 . DE/vr cc - Messrs Wilson K Cadman ' W B Walker Bernard Ruddick ' 5 M Haden ~ Ralph Foster . Jack Skelton
,--,---,-,.,,-..,-----,n - - - - - - , . - , - - . - , - -,,,,-,n- -- -, ,.----+---,---r,- v------.n----- .------w-e ,---- --~,--,e, ,, - - - - -
x
.(~ ) s.10-21 .. r .. . .< v .
May 1, 1978 h . Messrs John Hansberry l Bernard Ruddick ' l
- q. - a "- Gary Benson 4 .-
S M Haden R V McCalmont Attached is the legal description of the original town site ! of New Strawn along with the legal description of each additionato the city. This information was furnished by Dennis Roth. r 4 D 9
-F $ ,e *.e g ?
l
~
VR/ck s v .
Bo10-22 4., .. , s Mr Woolery May 10, 1978 O I understand that we plan to provide service to customers in the city of New Strawn about June 1. I know we wish to make this transition as smoothly and orderly as possible. I have some questions regarding the New Strawn sit-untion which may not be my concern, but I raise them for my own edification. , Question 1 - We have a franchise to serve the city of New Strawn. Under the new single certificate law (2047), does the fact that 1 we have a franchise eliminate the necessity of including l ~ the area inside the city limits in our legal descriptions [*\ of areas in Coffey County to be singly certificated to KG&E7 If it does not, then we should add the legal description of that area to those already filed with the Commission. Question 2 - I understand that we plan to serve the city of New Strawn with a new line originating at the substation constructed for the purpose of serving our loads in and around Wolf Creek Plant. The line would be built through our plant l property, then through REC territory to New Strawn. In February 1976, we received a limited Certificate of Convenience and Authority to transact business in the This certificate ' area of our Wolf Creek plant property. limits us to serving our loads and states that we shall l l serve no other load off any such facilities and prohibits ' us from engaging in any retail operation below 230 kv. l My question here is, can we serve New Strawn in the manner proposed without a change in the limited certificate? If not, do we plan to request a change in the certificate
'which would also change our application for single certifi-cation in Coffey County?
1
- t; u Ltr Mr Woo.lery 5/10/78 Question 3 -
That portion of the line through Coffey County REC territory will require a " transmission rights only" certificate. Have we filed an application for transnission rights through REC territory? O . l JIIHartford/nb , t l O l O l l l i
. , .S B.10-23 May 11, 1978 O .
Mr Fred B Adata Director, Utilities Division state Corporation connaission Topeka, Kansas 66612 Reference File L-2396-F, Proposed 7.2/12.5 Kv, three phase line to serve the town of New Strawn, Kansas. ,,, Dear Mr Ada;t Enclosed is odr EL application for approval of plans, specifications and location for a 7.2/12.5 KY, three phase line to serve the town of New Strawn, Kansas. Also enclosed as a part of our application are two copies of drawing L-2396-F, Cost Estimate, and copies of notices to all known conflicting utilities. _. L CUST. & COMM. ! f3 b0tV. 09T. ew q IIECCG ( I'*** '*U "#"IY' ill MAY 1!,1978 5
.1 J.W.3 Ult 30 J r.L".;$___
_tt.::',:a4 I Ji '.'.'1.!.03 L JHH/ JET /ey 3 65 Encis JJ, .I.. J:s . J3t:tLR _
.Jf 6KLIM .- 8/f SM C co - Masers 8 M Haden Js x'.t;S rt:a Lia T Ralph Foster Jsuu a;.ts Ja'*t'CK _ _
Jt *t . . J.:'.'.~1 _..('
- t- . -_
FILE _
.c o o - FORM "EL" BEFORE TIIE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS
~ In t'se matter of the application of Kansas Gas and Electric Company , for approval of plans, specifications and location "EL" No of a proposed electricline to serve the town of New Strawn, Kansas L-2396-r Appucent's IdnuScedon No.'
. . d __ ,_.i . r _, ,
I l APPLICATION l 1 I Kansas Gas and Electric Company I Wichita, Kansas , corporation g (Corporetson. partnership. individual er anonicipahty) I requesting the Commission to approve the attached plans, specifications and location of a proposed electric line to be constructed for the purpose of transmitting along, over and across the highways of the State of Kansas, as shown on the accompanying map and as hereinalter more fully described.
)
f The operating characteristics of this line are to be: 7,200/12,500 60 Hz 1250 volts. three phase. cycle, approximate loaa r. W. Electric i 7,200/12,500 volts, wye connected, 4 wire, multi-grounded. j e ,; r . .d. ei.i. 6.in u .a. ..d a. . i. .i. ===6., .e d.cio ..a ,*= .t sr =dwe >
'Ihe description of the location and points between which said proposed lineis to beinstalled and operated are as follows:
Beginning at the Wolf Creek Substation in the t'ortheast corner, Section 7, T215, RIGE, Coffey County, Kansas. Then North two miles, ; then West three miles, tren South 1/2 mile to the city of New Strawn as shown on drawing L-2396-F. Physical Properties of Line Poles, kina Pine heigh, 40 clas. 4 ; Conductor, typ, ACSR siz, 4/0 ; 252 feet; Has clearance been provided for other utilities-Ye X Na~ I Average span Cost Estimata N 7; 92 D Number and ty,>e of customer, Comunercial and Residential
? O O - The following is a correct list of all the public utilitics within M mile of proposed line.
NAME ADDRESS j Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Burlington, Kansas i Association, Inc
\
Phillips Pipeline Cospany Bartlesville, Oklahoma southwestern Bell Telephone company Topeka, Kansas tinited Telephone Company of Kansas, Inc Junction City, Kansas i O - i Is this line within the applicant's certificated area-Yes_X__No Is this line withia any other like utility's certificated area-Yes X Na Applicant further shows to the Commission that the construction of said proposed line shall be throughout in accordance with the Commission's rules as published in Docket No.1944, except None Applicant further states that wherever the proposed line is to be located on private right-of-way the land-owner's lawful consent will be obtained. Applicant further states that " Inductive Coordination" has been or will be complied with as related in Docket No.1944. Applicant further states that all utilities and railroads listed above have been notiSed in writing as provided in Rule 202A (a copy of which is attached), and that such notice contains the statement that "if there is any ob. jection to the applicant's proposed line construction, sucl objection shall be forwarded to the State Corporation Commission within the time speellied in Rule 202A from date of notice." WIIEREFORE, applicant requests the State Corporation Commission to issue its order approving the plans, ' speciScations 'and location of the said proposed line, as hereinhefore described. day of 'May ,1g23_ Dated at_ Wichita , Kansas, thie 11 i mus cas aan -rntc COMPANY (Applicant) j 1 s c . nea inne of ose.) Vice President - Engineering {
- Applicant's identiSention of app!! cation and related papers.,
i in.,-ce .
. subma 1 copy of appucouse
- eeples of more f acete not less then I loch per egen.
Coples of all satices to other etBAles. case brennae.e er "c it E.imete" br units of proputy , FORM "EL."-Fase 1 o . _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ____
~
Ti
~
B.lo-24 Mr Ralph Foster May 15, 1978 O As you know, this morning I' visited with Ward Salisbury of the KCC who had discussed the service. to New Strawn with Gary Dawdy and Fred Adam. Their conclusion was that KG&E needed to apply for an Amendment to the Limited Certificate which we hold for service in Coffey County. I talleve this is Docket No. 107,167.-U. Since our existing Certificate specifically prohibits us from serving any retail customers, we will need to change this to give us the right to seek transmission rights from Wolf Creek to New Strawn as well as the ability to serve an area such as New Strawn within this area. f**s As you know our franchise date is June 1,1978, thus the timing I on filing this knendment is critical. Hay we niease have your ! assistance as quickly as possible to resolve this matter? l l DE/vr i cc - Messrs Wilson K Cadman G L Koester/ John Hansberry W K Woolery/ John Hartford *
, Francis Saint / Jim Titus Doug Stratton -
* [r:4wls B.10-25 KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Box 206 Wichita, Kansas 67201 me s6scen.c ~ -- y '
o) , l' d ' ' '
/
g,p l, ,, May 17, 1978 O . 3 Mr Ly1 dIorriott Manager Coffe County ral Electric Cooperative 7.3s.ciatio , Inc d POfox2 BurJin f n, Kansas 66839 m Deae Mr Herriotts i l v Enc sed is a corrected copy of Form CC Application for Certificate of Convenience and Authority for transmission rightd(to serve the city of New Strawn, Kansas. An error
' in the legal description has been corrected. .s Please destroy the copy sent to you on May 11, 1978. "
CUST. & COMM. S SF.CV. MPT. a g e.ECEl'KO g MAY 18 1978 3 Yours very truly, J Rittr,ven T.n .n - dtW.' i t
\ m H. HAWW . _ t:.: n t JG ..:_.
s:.;a .. v
/ ~
u- :n JHH/ JET /ey 1.: . :t m5 wr _.._ J '.. J. s - b n::.. .m . t.n.stc:s . _
-.J MG cc - Mr Ralph Foster Mr Dennis Evans /Ms Verna Ridgeway $ ' k.'vIv# / 'an .
ett;;,c c / _f AT E , _F Al' . _ _ _ V,0' .;e l/ E JsLE
. - - , , , . - + - , . . - - - - , , - , - , , ~ - - , - - , - - - - - , . , -
5/31/78 - copy to S M Haden B.10-26
** *f ~ KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Bos 208 Wich! ta. Kansas 61201 r e suscraec ecm w n j'.. aff' E }if A // .o I ,t- - CllST. & COMM.
May 30, 1978 # _, LQ'y'((0
- S M
MAY 31 1978 = anter.ruwe O
. cr n. u .
__JM 'utu: is - / _ __t','t.*t'. ) L _ i rv. ; rcma
] Mr Ly e Herriot , Manager J;[p,*
wy Coff County ural Electric Cooperative Ass ociatio , Inc j.((j.',
'G TA tt d PODox 22 Burl; .n , Kansas 66839 4,$Et7r, ac.u;u JU m eru
Dear Herriott:
',^'[,. ,3 ., _
amws -
/
M~ v Enclose sis a corrected copy of Form CC Application for ## Certifica'te,of Convenience and Authority for transmission rights to s4rve the city of New Strawn, Kansas. An error ,
' in the legal description has been corrected. .s Please destroy the copy sent to you on May 11, 1978.
Yours very truly,
\ M)HN H. HANSDERRY JHH/FS/ey anci cc - Mr Fred B Adam .
state Corporation Commission bc - Mr Ralph Foster Mr Dennis Evans /Ms Verna Ridgeway
,om tio
- KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY P. O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 n.se6scranc c - mair May 30, 1978 1
Mr Fr B A am Diregtor, tilities Division Stat (c ration comunission J To , Kansas 66612 m
Dear Adam:
Enclosed is ' the original and five copies of an application u for amending our Limited certificate of convenience and
, Authority to transact business as an electric public utility in Coffey County, Kansas, Docket 197,167-U. . a Yours very truly, ElHN H.HANSBERRY 1 JHH/FS/ey cc - 1(ansas City Power and Light Ccapany The Kansas Power and Light C,capany coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative ,
Association, Inc bc - Hessrs Ralph Foster Dennis Evan
,-. - - . . . , , . , - - . . _, ,_, ,, . _ - . - . - , , . . , _ . _ _ , . . _ . - . . - . _ , , ..__,._-,_r-._,.m.,_ _ _ , _ -_ _ _ . . - _ , . _ - - . _ . . - - , , . - . ,
i
. 1, ,. ]
E li I. BEFORE THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of an Amended Applicatinn )
)
p g of Kansas Gas and Electric Company for a ) Limited Certificate of Convenience and I Authority to Transact Business as an
) Docket No. 107,167-l1 Electric Public Utility in Cof fey County, ))
Kansas.
)
APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDED LIMITED CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND AUTHORITY l COMES NOW Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, l Kansas (Applicant), pursuant to K.S. A. 66-131, and for its , O' Application for an Amended Limited Certificate of Convenience [andAuthoritytotransactbusinessasanelectricpublicutility I in Coffey County, Kansas, represents and shows to the Commission I l as follows:
- 1. That Applicant is a Kansas corporation transacting i; business as an electric public utility in the State of Kansas and t
, is certificated to . transact business as a public utility in the
' f following portions of Coffey County, Kansas, to-wit: 1
! (a) Sections 1, 2, 3, 8, 10 to 17 inclusive, 19 ,! to 36 inclusive, and all of Section 9 West of the Neosho River; all in Township 21 South, Range 15 East.
lI (b) Sections 1 to 36 inclusive, all in Township 21 South, Range 16 East. (c) Sections 3 to 10 inclusive, 15 to 22 inclusive, and 27 to 34 inclusive, all in Township 21 South, Range 17 East. (d) Sections 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25, 26, 35 and 36, all in Township 22 South, Range 13 East. (e) Sections 1 to 36 inclusive, all in Township 2T South, Range 14 East. l ' (f) Sections 1 to 36 inclusive, all in Township 22 South, Range 15 East. l l lh l UEo~s"sa (g) Sections 1 to 36 inc1rsive', all in Township 27
," ;;", , , ,,,,, 1 * * " * "
- South, Range 16 East.
.',".",.J"'[ .= :=, s * *'" *";;" d l llll". ."*:.". ( l
! P I
l j l' l! (h) Sections 3 to 10 inclusive. 15 to 22 inclusive, and 27 to 34 inclusive, all in Town-P ship 22 South, Range 17 East. l Il
': (1) Sections 1, 2, 11, 12, 13 and 14, all (
in Township 23 South, Range 13 East. [ (j) Sections 1 to 18 inclusive, all in h ll Township 23 South, Range 14* East. li (k) Sections 1 to 18 inclusive, all in l Il l Township 23 South, Range 15 East. i-(1) Sections 1 to 18 inclusive, all in !
! Township 23 South, Range 16 East.
(m) Sections 3 to 10 inclusive', and 15 to
- q 8 inclusive, all in Township 23 South, Range 17 ,
g I (n) Sections 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 5, and 36, all in Township 20 South, Range f
) y'Est. !
O 1 (o)' Sections 30, 31, and 32, all in Township 20 [' South, Range 16 East. 1 I
- 2. That an Amended Application in the instant docket :
li was previously filed with this Commission on the 10th day of February, 1976, wherein KG&E set forth its proposal to transact P business as an electric public utility in those territories ] P identified in paragraphs (n) and (o) above in the manner and f I for the limited purposes of: , Constructing, owning, operating, maintaining, removing, replacing and otherwise controlling and , ll managing, incident to an entire or an undivided t
', ownership interest, either directly or indirectly, 1 J singly as well as along with other certificated ! !' public and private suppliers of electric power.
in and to an electric generating station and its 4 transmission lines, appurtenances, together with any and all facilitics, equipment and installations : ( related thereto or to the production and trans- . mission of power and energy therefrom, and Applicant shall be prohibited from engaging in any retail ,
; electric utility operations below 230,000 volts in I y
the above said territory. That the Applicant may ; serve its own load at any voltage in the above- t-described territory, but shall serve no other load off of any such facilities, nor shall'any such P facilities in said townships be used for purpose- '
. of measurement under the line extension. rules.
I i , k l H
- p 1
I
- e I 3. That on the lith day of February, 1976, this l
P, Conusission approved the above referenced Amended Application 3 6 s, and granted KG&E a Limited Certificate as applied for in f '
!! accordance with the provisions of K.S.A. 66-131.
b j, 4. That subsequent to approval of the above ref-
. erenced Amended Application, residents of the City of New h (which city is 1 p Strawn, Kansas, a municipal corporation, I '. located within Section 34, Township 20 South, Range 15 East'and ,i l! Section 3 Township 21 South, Range 15 East) at a referendum l elected to confirm a grant to Kansas Gas and Electric Company y of a franchise to serve customers within the corporate limits !
I il of that City. O l- 5. That the above mentioned Amended Application , t i for a Limited Certificate of Convenience and Authority 8 e i j(filedonFebruary 10, 1976) and the above referenced Limited Certificate (approved and certified by the Conunission on I February 11, 1976) does not comport with the franchise I j issued by the City of New Strawn to Kansas Gas and Electric f'CompanyinasmuchasthereferencedAmendedApplicationand I Limited Certificate provides that the Applicant, Kansas Gas 3 and Electric Company, shall be prohibited from engaging in l any retail electric utility operations below 230,000 volts l I within the territories described in paragraphs (n) and (o) I b ,
.I above.
p
- 6. That Applicant propos.es and intends to transact ;
y- '
' business as an electric public utility within the following 1 i . certificated territories in Coffey County, Kansas: '
i Sections 13, 14. 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 34, h 35, and 36. Township 20 South, Range 15 East of the Sixth Principal Meridian, and . Sections 30, 31, and 32. Township 20 South, Range 16 East, of the Sixth Principal Meridian; all in j
' Coffey County, Kansas, . t. l e i
- 9 e
i I
?.
I h I i-
- i, . 3-
s l
.I 6
h in the manner and for the limited purposes of: , q!! Constructing, owning, operating, maintaining, removing, replacing and otherwise controlling, and - fl managing, incident to an entire ur an undivided l
! ownership interest, either directly or indirectly, ,
O'
;d singly as well as along with other certificated d
public and private suppliers of electric power, in 1,; and to an electric generating station and its jl transmission lines, appurtenances, together with : any and all facilities, equipment and installations [ l; related thereto or to the production and transmission y of power and energy therefrom. Applicant shall l
- - be prohibited from engaging in any retail electric ,
i; utility operations below 230,000 volts in the ' ll above said territory, except that Applicant shall [ be allowed to engage in the distribution and sale I of electric power below 230,000 voltstoelectricalflj. customers within the corporate limits of the City i, 4 ofNewStrawnandwithinanyterritorysubsequently] ! 4 annexed by the City of New Strawn and transmit ; power to a point or points within the said City ofj O ! New Strawn. The Applicant may serve its own load iy at any voltage in the above-described territory. ;
- 7. That Applicant seeks approval of the within
[ Application for an Amended Limited Certificate of Convenience and Authority for the sole and exclusive purposes as set {forthinparagraph6 hereof,anddoesnotseektoextendits i
,? previously stated service area set forth in paragraph 1, but i ,I ,
g does seek to amend for limited purposes as set forth in i fparagraph6 hereof. .
- 8. That Applicant is in the process of constructing l
a generating facility in the area referred to in paragraph 6 l 4 l' l hereof, subject to authority from state and federal ag,encies. p 9. That the other electric public utilities now i l
; operating in those portions of Coffey' County, Kansas,' for ! which Applicant see'ks the within Amended Limited Certificate of Convenience and Authority are as follows: 1(ansas City Power & Light Company, Kansas Power & Light Cotpany, and the , ')CoffeyCountyRuralElectricCooperativeAssociation,Inc.
i a WHEREFORE, Applicant requests that its Application 9
,i for an Amended Limited Certificate of Convenience and Authority be granted, and that an Amended Limited Certificate of l I
f i~ i i, N e 1 6
~
i
, . . . l 1,
1 ! I f i 1
' Convenience and Authority be issued granting Applicant the lright to transact the business of an electric public utility +
h within the following certificated territories in Coffey County, O hKansas: I Sectio'ns 13, 14', 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35, and 36. Townsnip 20 South, Range 15 East of a I
'l the Sixth Principal Meridian, and Sections 30, 31, and 32, Township 20 South, Range l 16 East, of the Sixth Principal Meridian; all in l Coffey County, Kansas, in the manner and for the limited purposes of:
l Constructing, owning, operating, maintaining,
'l removing, replacing and otherwise controlling, and i managing, incident to an entire or an undivided l ownership interest, either directly or indirectly,
- p sin ly as well as along with other certificated I
* . pub ic and private suppliers of electric power, y
in and to an electric generating station and its ! transmission lines, appurtenances, together with
- l I any and all facilities, equipment and installations related thereto or to the production and transmission l of power and energy therefrom. Applicant shall be prohibited from engaging in any retail electric n
utility operations below 230,000 volts in the above said territory, except that Applicant shall be' (- f allowed to engage in the distribution and sale of g 8 h electric power below 230,000 volts to electrical ,
; customers within the corporate limits of the City of New Strawn and within any territory subsequently i i annexed by the City of Now Strawn and transmit 8 'l power to a point or points within the said City of :
New Strawn. The Applicant may serve its own load . I,, at any voltage in the above-described territory. V
' KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY l =0 l /pP icgnt h
l
~dman "
k .An1 % a y son Executive Vice President , d ' e R
!. i n ! . )
il as i. I
!4 -i .s.
7 s i I STATE OF KANSAS )
) SS i l SEDGWICK COUNTY ) i P ;' I WILSON CADMAN, of lawful age, being first duly sworn, i ldeposesandsays:
O' That he is Executive Vice President of the within-
. named Applicant,' that he has read the above and foregoing l li application, and the statements therein contained are true, h \ .. )
g 8;
/J Wilsion Cadman* /. dJ /_%
t l
'd- * - day of h
1'1 ON ./, Subscribed and sworn to before me this
, 1978. l I
P. ' 4 p a:
- f. .}.....,..r,,........
t
. IEtary Fuli1Tc :
i i li My commission expires: j a gg e w,g i -- 1 i H i i l: i
!4 L
s
!I e .l 5 .
r 1
,9 i
I-l i
- t. I.
I4 j I
+. t .a Il l{ -
I. ,
~ !i I
l - J
. ~
4' .~ B.10-27 vv
*x,,.
v June 2.1978 O
- CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr Lyle Herriott. Manager .
Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc l P O Box 229 ( Burlington. Kansas 66839 l
Dear Mr Herriott:
One month ago I requested certain information from you with regard to the facilities of Coffey County REC that serve the City of I New Strawn. As yet I have received no response to rg letter, a l p copy of which is attached. Please advise me of the status of the request. Your expeditious handling of this matter will avoid undue delay in providing service to the residents of New Strawn as 16my have requested. . Stacerely. . l l DE/vr Attachment cc - Messrs G T VanBebber, Chairman. KCC Fred B Adam. Director . Utilities Division. KCC . Otis Jones. Mayor, New Strawn. bc - Messrs Wilson K. Cadman G L Koester Bernard Ruddick . John Hansberry S M Haden Jack Skelton Ralph Foster
4 , 7g y a# g "r li t ag . p rv n c .-,y3
. ,. t p, l -
MChj
=a. 2
- .u,,s. . r .-
.ps. .y g
at 2 ..
} s'8m.e.a .li ' .
ea,y E I. - p .:' ii ::I r g-
,.s.
4
.i y;7 -- - - - -- - -
H 3 0 ',. .. 32g g,
!E "3 f"4 ,d*k.k, ha.p,,
- .xne o e - - - - -
- .f u g t .i :.w.?;.9 o~~., '
. \ - --- .. ..- a Eny s "u o g
,$,,g_
g e SE ' ' ' w*U ) k. SgdN .! J*4 3 rt t g- h. l 8 g o..= ,: Q . '.
.t M -,
5 # ,6 h
>3 .
t-g 2 4.- .&.BSlilj 5
- g
.g! 'd= d g w g .- ? g? - %.g -
t s- p 2S g
.B . rp- 6 s-- [Q .&a 1 2g g*.3a . .x -
- t. g.
- u. e; k 5 $<
a$3 wy . '$. :.'
$o 0 <3 5-4 1, $g555 =
l 3 w %. . > r': l .00 __. o y $' go'
. . . _ . ,. 8 , . . '? ~~
b 'e I 8 ;: $ 2 e ssNDER: Campi = - w , o.n.s
- u. I. J .a.J. l.. wp .i.
i r y g sg I -- t- a s r l == a a s . io A P i !! i. n= roiso-in,n,vicei.,.goe a (ch.a e). who a.d d e deii,er.d . . . . . . . . . . . 23d
} ; c o
h g h 8' O sh e ., g g g r I O 5ho- = =ha=. d.=.
- addr*= d d.13=r 0 . p>f 1 !i O '* o 2GR O RESTRICTED DELIVERY.
gy gf Nf 3 Show to wheen and dose deliver.d . . . ; . f. g. p. yd h (B f~
}ga 3 i =)o* ,1,h N O RESTRUED DWVERY.Show ed whosa,date, a
f t o and)address of delivery
.) .l.$1.03 g
l} , shown see la addidos ao posense charges and other
). <a . i s ---y a . o. .
e s m a s a o.a. . e e
$9 (sfg 1 g. s .,
l g g. m , n a u v4.a . ,$ i( g );s p 7
. .mac .c.c=mn.. . _u . - _
g B i .
' .3 g a - - . ..m . 'Te/W So . 12 . . . . .
a8 a m 4 W W 9
'g m r. .asm .na .e .ne n, .
W..e.y;
.~ . .,
7,. Jf I have received the article described ab.vej bl }
$ g ( ITr,..'=e *,.
I -- Smaatuas Addr ce O Authorier ni g ., w . ,
~
o 4) .'-
" .p ' "s '
m s ',
- 32 L. .
a * ]%
- En ,? V%
d % g <yanTtor
' . , ,o w n.nu z=- ,
3 al 5 HE y
~' * / a-1978 g .,.-* " := , , .
D ll m ~= e-e *, * ~e ott > d CLERK's o> g '- G. U80ASLE TO DELIVER NCAUSE: smTnALS ga .-. - - Ow $ = _
- d. 50
-- _.3 i
l *- S
!5,
, o98 !! 5 , yo
* - " * * * * '- "
- 2 = c 0 2
- Sh \ , _ , _ . _
nvn umuna ouv a oa annsucownsmuosauvmaav mi . v uw -m sa agggg
- c. w-se
, s J5 s.
y ec. A BEFORE Tile STATE CORPORATIOti COMMISSION ., ') 1 OF THE STATE OF KANSAS g l' op p-h In the Matter of an Amended Application ) of Kansas Gas and Electric Company ) Docket No. 107,167-U
)
for a Limited Certificate of Convenience and Authority to transact business as an ) Electric Public Utility in Coffey County, ) Kansas. ) In the Matter of the Application of Kansas ) Gas and Electric Coinpany for a cert $ficate ) Docket No. 115,213-U of Convenience and Authority to transact the ) business of a public utility in the State of ) Kansas, transmission rights only in certain ) areas of Coffey County, Kansas. ) p Kansas Gasproposed L-2396-F, and Electric Corrpany 7.2/12.5, threefilephase line)} EL 16999 to serve the Town of New Strawn, Kansas. ) APPLICATION FOR PERf1ISSION TO INTERVENE PURSUANT TO RULE 82-1-225(a) AND PROTEST OF APPLIf.ATIONS AND REQUEST FOR-HEARING COMES NOW The Cof fey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc., (hereinaf ter referrod to as "COFFEY COUNTY") and requests permission of the State Corporation Copumission to intervene in the proceedings in the above-captioned matters. In support hereof, COFFEY COUNTY respectfully represents and states to the Comunission as follows:
- 1. COFFEY COUNTY is a public utility, as that term is defined by K.S.A. 66-104, and holds certificates of convenience and authority from the Commission to transact the business of an electric public utility in certain areas in the State *gg fMW CI*f. !
' of Kansas. k 8Md8 $ . JU.121 H73 ?
- 2. COFFEY COUNTY's certificate of authority and its rules and '. A*1M regulations pertaining to conditions of service previously D '.T approved by the Commission, are hereby incorporated herein t y(
, 7. .- .nr *.M..
' . reference. *f . ,
~.
_M.e .l,.' T
- 01t .~.JAft ._. .-2.': . : =
M wem M4eme 6g
- - -. e r -
,e e -
t
- 3. The application flied by Kansas Gas and Electric Company requests the Commission to grant it cortificated authority in areas already certificated to COFFEY COUNTY and mado exclusive . territory by K.S. A.1977 Supp. 66-1,170 et seq. ,
and the agreement c' the parties by maps filed with the Commission.
- 4. COFFEY COUNTY objects and is opposed to the granting of the applications and would be adversely affected by a Commission Order granting the requests of the applicant.
- 5. The granting of the applications filed herein would not be I'\ in the interests of the present and future electric customers in the territory involved and the intent of the Kansas Legis-lature as set 1 1th in K.S.A. 66-1,170 et seq.
WHEREFORE.The Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc., hereby applies for permission to intervene as a matter of right in these proceedings, pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and , Procedure , 82-1-225(a), and permission to participate fully as a party in interest in all proceedings related to the application filed herein; and requests the applications be noticed for hearing with notice given to all interested parties, including COFFEY COUNTY. L. R. HANNEN 100 North Third Burlington, Kansas 66839 '- JAMES M. CAPLINGER, CHARTERED 823 West Tenth Street Topeka, Kansas 66612 By 'h ntMJ b,,. J Pos M. Caplin(fr f-thttorneys for The Coffey County l Rural Electric Cooperative l Association, Inc. r- - m e,w r - -
.= ._ . - _ - --, . _ . _ _ .
ip 8 .
. .* i CERTIFICATE Ol' S!:RVICI'.
I hereby certify that a copy of the Application for Permission to Intervene and Protest and Request for llearing was mailed, postage prepaid, ' to the following on this 9th day of June, 1978.
- Ralph Foster, Esquire Kansas Gas and Electric Building Post Office Box 208 Wichita, Kansas (7201
/ 1:**!/ -h - as > 'Jamos ~M'.
C~ag5/ingerf i i I I F
-r,,-- - . , -,r -,e--n-. , - , . ~ , - - -, .,---n - , , . . -- - .,- .e ,,.,w-,,,-wr,--, -,.,.-..,-m,, --y-- -..,,-,m, - , - , - - , , v s -
w- ,
h / St..yaf X.m> j'QL
-. . . . . m e 10-29 j' g,3 ROstR19. 8tHNif1 Coverne, Qt Off0FQ$$0ft OHtHtl83IOft ,
- c. f. (Tom VAN statta cheiraea wittiam o. ceAY Com i..Jeae, . Fourth IIOOr, State Office Bldg.
nicHAo c. (Ptits toux c...J..,e.e, Ph. 9:3ht6 3355 sitytM o. CAntre see,ee s,y TOPEKA, KANSAS 66612 THOMAS J. PltNiR Generel Covasel ' 5.e,J ccess.s 40 : Dcos ors d< *
- Cfq* el A b
, y,/y 6 <lM+-
Mr. John H. Hansberry, V. P. Engineering ~* Kansas Cas and Electric Cormpany O#"/ j f,f, ri P.O. Box 208 //ev/y g /e c ,. Wichita, Kansas 67201 M //'d
Dear Sir:
.y , p f-ltr} U ***1 jg //,c/fn We are enclosing a copy of' order in Docket Numbers 107,167-U, '115,213-U, and Et,16999 as entered by the Conunission on the 16th day of June,1978.
Yours very truly, STATE CORPORATION C0t9tISS10N hl0W,A @. 00AleA Steven D. Carter, Secretary CUST. & COMM. I S SF.RV.0EPT. 3 EdCOVED 8 cje '. JUL 5 1918 E m ene. .V'} _ , , , - J h o' \ ' 9htt%Cs JC'.u1 / JLL' Cit / _tVA\* D L. I ' dg
$'.\ ,
Jrreni _JMitR J!W %Y
}gy . J'.*.'tl's y' Jf .. ' ',G I t 4 .-- A14CKir's J:C.17AC J I'lillif 5 JT3f AFF
_ICC('.' LAY I r.L _Pf eCe _ IA't . _ tsut.._. I4L'.L.f .. w __ FIL
o 1 T'HE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Before Commissioners: G. T. Van Bebber, Chairman William G. Gray R. C. Loux O In the !!atter of an Amended. Application) of Kansas Gas and Electric Company for ) a Limited Certificate of Convenience ) Docket No. 107,167-U and Authority.to transact business as ) an Electric Public Utility in Coffee ) County, Kansas. ) In the Matter of the Application of ) Kansas Gas and Electric Company for ) a certificate of Convenience and ) Docket No. 115,213-U Authority to transact the business ) of a public utility in the State ) of Kansas, transmission rights only ) in certain areas of Coffey County, ) Kansas. ) O Kansas Gas and Electric Company file ) Docket No. EL 16999 L-2396-F, proposed 7.2/12.5, three ) phase line to serve the town of ~) New Strawn , Kansas. ,
)
ORDER Now, on this 16th day of June,1978 there comes on for consideration and determination by the State Corporation Commission the Application For Permission To Intervene And Protest Of Applications And Request for. Hearing filed by The Cof fey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc. in the above-captioned docket on June 9,1978. After full consideration of the agiication and being fully advised in the premises, the Commission finds' and concludes that:
- 1. On February 10, 1976 Kansas Gas E Electric Com-
.pany (KGGE) filed an application and an amended application for a limited certificate of convenience and authority to transact business as as electric public utility in Coffey County, Kansas. The amended application of KG6E proposed and intended to further transact business as an electric public utility outsido its then certificated territories in Kansas in the manner and for the limited purposes of -e
Constructing, owning, optreting, maintaining, removing, replacing and otherwise controlling and the managing, incident to an entire or an undivided ownership interest, either directly or indirectly, singly as well as along with other certificated public and private suppliers of electric power, in and to an electric gener-ating station and its transmission lines, appurtenances, together with any and all f acil-ities, equipment and installations related thereto or to the production and transmission of power and energy therefrom, and Applicant shall be prohibited from engaging in any retail electric utility operations below 230,000 volts in the above said territory. That the appil-cant may serve its own load at any voltage in the above-described territory, but shall serve no other load of f of any such facilities, nor shall any such facilities in said townships be used for purpuse of measurement under the line extension rules. On February 11, 1976 the Commission, without a formal hearing, issued an order granting KGEE's amended application , for a limited certificate. O 2. On May 15, 1978 KG&E filed an application for a i certificate for transmission rights only from its Wolf. Creek substation in the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, T215, R16E, Coffey County, Kansas to the city limits of New Strawn, Kansas. This application was assigned Docket No. 115,213-U. On the same date KG&E filed a form "EL" requesting the commission to approve attached plans, specifications and
' location of a proposed electric transmission line from the Wolf Creek substation to the City of New Strawn, Kansas.
Jhis application was assigned Docket No. EL 16999.
- 3. On May 31, 1978 KG&E filed an application in Docket No. 197,167-U'for an amended limited certificate of convenience and authority which would allow KGEE to engage in the distribution and sale of electric power below 230,000
' volts to electrical customers within the corporate limits of
,' the City of New Strawn and 'within any territory subsequently annexed by the City of New Strawn, and to transmit power to a point or points within the said City of New Strawn. The application would also allow KGEE to serve its own load at any voltage in the above-described territory. The basis of
o . . the application is that subssquint to approval of ths appli-cation and amended application for a limited certificate which was granted on February 11, 1976 residents of the City of New Strawn, Kansas, a municipal corporation, at a ref-erendum elected to confirm a grant to KGsE of a franchise to serve customers within the corporate limits of that city. I) 4. On June 9, 1978 the Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc., (hereafter Coffey County) filed an application for permission to intervene and protest of applications, and a request for hearing. In support of its application Cof fey County stated that it is a public utility and hoLos certificates of convenience and authority from the Commission to transact the business of an electric Fur-public utility in certain areas in the State of Kansas. I"I ther, that the application filed by KGEE requests the Com-mission to grant it certificated authority in areas already certificated to Coffey County and made exclusive territory pursuant to K.S.A. 1977.Supp. 66-1,170 et seq. and the agree-ment'of the parties by maps filed with the Commission. Coffey County objects to KGEE's application and alleges the granting of the application would adversely affect Coffey County, and would not be in the interest of the present and future electric customers in the territory involved and the intent of the Kansas legislature as set forth in the statute
' cited above.
- 5. Based on the foregoing facts, the Commission finds that the application for permission to intervene and request for hearing should be granted in Docket No. 107,167-U. As Docket Nos. EL 16999 and 115,213-U relate to the same matters,
. all dockets should be hemniat one time.
IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COMMISSION ORDERED THAT: The application for permission to intervene and r'e-questing a hearing filed by the Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Inc., be, and it hereby is, granted. D E8'". : r; .--
- 9. . 3 .y 4
, - . . , . _ - n., -,
.,* e e .
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED T!!AT: A formal' hearing in these dockets shall be held at 9:30 A.M., CDT, September 6, 1978 in the Conunission's hearing room located on the fourth floor, State Office Building, Topeka, Kansas. The Conunission retains jurisdiction of the subject A matter and the parties for the purpose of entering such e further order or order s as it may deem proper. Van Bebber, Chmn.: Gray, Com.; Loux, Com. Steven D. Carter, Secretary RWS : tw
, .g , ,',e[ d .
4-4
, - , - -r , , , , , - e ,m< a , , - - --- --n --
c , ., ,, a em,-
n.10-30 June 16,1978 (M1? Mr Lyle Herriott, Manager ' ' ' ' Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc P O Box 229 Burlington, Kansas 66839
Dear Mr Herriott:
We have not heard.from you regarding our letters of May 1 and June 2,1978. Please advise'the status of our request. Sincerely. A
,,) - ' ',)
l
'h t , , . , ..e ' ***
- g. , /,*) W 4 '
- l; r. * ' .' .
4,
?. .
l l ( DE/vr cc - Messrs G T VanBebber, Chaiman, EC
. Fred 8 Adam. Director, '*
Utilities Division KCC
,,' l' Otis Jones, Mayor. .New Strawn ; .
bc - Messrs Wilson K Cadman ' G L Koester Bernard Ruddick John Hansberry o- S M Haden
'5 .^ . ' Jack Skelton - . l. '
Ralph Foster
B.lo-31 Posa 1977 ety. l.67 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE to, MEMORANDUM TO FILE oir e, June 19, 1978 SU4JECTs C Lyle Herriott called today and indicated the main reason he had not responded to any of my letters was that he didn't u,nderstand what the request wanted. Barney Ruddick joined our conversation and we told Mr Herriott we were interested in information regarding transformer size and age, conductor size, height and age of poles--ali norral information that would enable us to make a fair and reasonable offer to Coffey County REC for their facilities within the city of New Strawn. Mr Herriott said he thought that was premature since we, even though holding a franchise, did not have the right to serve New Strawn. He also said : hat they thought they had some rights to be there even in face of referendum vote and that he did not know whether or not they wanted to sell their system. O I told him we were trying to handle this on an expedient basis in order to provide the citizens of New Strawn with the service they had requested; that I did not think our request was premature but only an effort to reduce delays. l Mr Herriott again mentioned they might not want to sell the system. I told him if their feeling was that they did not want to sell their system to please send me a letter so indicating. Mr Herriott did say he would send me a letter indicating what information was readily available in line with my letters of request. He also stated he would expect reimbursement for the costs incurred to accumulate this information at which time I asked him to advise me of what information could be made available and what kind of costs he was talking about. I DE/ck cc - Messrs W K Cadnen G L Koester Ralph Foster S M Haden
4
- *
- B.10-32 e
i
' ' "A June 30, 1978 l - - [' , ,.
l
!!r Lyle lierriott, Hanauer l b Coffey County Rural ~ Electric Cooperative Association, Inc ,. .
i .. l ' P. O Box 229 - Surlington. . Kansas. 66839 . . , l
Dear Mr lierriott:
t Since we have not heard from you regarding the inforination about your equipment inside the city limits of New Strawn as mentioned in my letters of May 1. June 2, and June 16 and discussed on the telephone on. June 19, we must assume that Coffey County Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc does not wish to sell its facilities. You mentioned this as a very distinct possibility in our telephone conversation. ' , Since this is the case, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, at the O appropriate time, will make its own arrangements for providing service to the customers who have requested service in New Strawn.
'" Sincerely, ^ ,* , qs, ,,-? ~ . . ,. . 2c , ~ - .- .,. . y . . .- y .: ,fy ; ,. z. .,
1 DE/ck cc - Messrs G T VanBebber, Chairman, KCC Fred 8 Adam, Director. Utilities Division, KCC Otis Jones, Mayor,,New Strawn. ,
, .- ... t ..J bc - Messrs Wilson K Cadman r -
G L Koester - Bernard Ruddick . John Hansberry S M Haden Jack Skelton Ralph Foster a . t
7/3/78 - copies to Messrs W K d n .
d Bernard Ruddii J Hansberry 6 'hh S M Haden l Jack Skelton .B.10-33 Ralph Foster COFFEY COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION,INC.
P.O. BOX 229
- BURUNGTON.KANS AS
- 66839 + PHONE (31 June 30, 1978 Q Mr. Dennis Evan, Vice P' resident i
Customers and Community Service Kansas Ga3 & Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 667201
Dear Mr. Evans:
In response to your request for information concerning Coffey County Rural Electric's distribution facilities, services and meters utilized to provide electric utility service in and to New Strawn, Kansas, I would point-out that Coffey County Rural Electric is certificated by the Kansas Corporation Commission to transact the business of an electric public utility in the area and intends to continue to meet that responsibility. As you are aware, we have intervened into and lodged our protest to Kansas Gas & Electric's application for a certificate of convenience and j authority to transact the business of a public utility in the area, and to t extend its electric facilities. Kansas Gas & Electric, not having a right to serve the area, is in no position to offer to acquire Coffey County Rural Electric's physical facilities. cusT.& cor.w. H Il D $ Yours truly, e JUL 3 ISit 9 h . ,'sh
- sur Lyle Herriott, Manager ---gp f
__w u n < _ r.c .. LH/sw $$iN.u
,,n.:.
cc: James M. Caplinger , Attorney-at-Law _],jtg:,t 7:cNitfix t* ,p reame M1%
't.:,9- --- -
_v cce. v. _ _ _ _ l .- - -- - .- .. -, _ --
l [- b, s e th B.10-34 COFFEY COUNTY RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION,INC. P.O. BOX 229
- BURLINGTON.K ANSAS 66839
- PHONE (3161364 211 July 7, 1978 7/10/78 - copy to Messrs W K Cadman G L Koester Bernard Ruddick g
- Jchn Hansberry S M Haden Mr. Dennis Evans, Vice President Jack Skelton Customers and Community Service Ralph Foster Kansas Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201
Dear Mr. Evans:
Apparently our letters of June 30 crossed in the mail, so when you wrote your letter you had not received mine in which I set forth my position regarding the supply of information on which you could base an offer for our system. I trust that after your review of this letter that you will better O understand our position. Yours truly,
' I s t. t. 00?.W.
f ce$[iiIb.~@ Lyle Herriott, Manager 3.! JUL 10 1C78 2 m t*c m
/
LH/sw dE,I'T e cc: James Caplinger Jy;.g. _ J :: f L. B. Hannen j[{j,y Bob Phillips ster.at G. T. VanBebber jg-- Fred B. Adc.a Otis Jones grj[q.g-r . .n .. J C':*?TF , J.C'.".V AY
#!Y*C
__m .: __ _ _C - *._ _
= 10-35 M/
e RA.R. ,0.T E R BLfa L <...>....O... RoeERf A VOWS mANSAs OAS AND ELECTR.C SutLOINO O DOVOL AS STRATTON P O. BOX 208, wlCHITA. KANSAS G7300 JOHN J HE AL3 ER WARREN 5. WOOD ROBERT O STEIGER August 7, 1978 O .
. cun.c.cor.w o
h' AUG SE[N 8 19n: ~k Mr. Dennis L. Evans Vice President - Customer and Community Services - KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY -- ni n n Wichita, Kansas .- . 1 e::**.t ~ *u. ,
-- . . J I ' 6.'. f ..
Z.5 . . , ' Re: Amended Application of Kansas Gas and '
~~
Electric Company for Limited Certificate --j)'.l[1__
-. r of Convenience and Authority to transact , - - -
business in Coffey County, Kansas - ZR,.; - m C_ O Docket No. 107,167-U; . rav.vp t+ . + . , _ _ Application of Kansas Gas and Electric g mi Z[E".'.'_g. Company for Certificate of Convenience and Authority to transact business in ---Mm. - - - State of Kansas, transmission rights Zif
~~ ' ED only in certain areas of Coffey County, -
Kansas - Docket No. 115,213-U; - - , . . . . _ _ . Kansas Gas and Electric Company file L-2396-F, proposed 7.2/12.5, three phase I','
/<.f4, l '~
line to serve Town of New Strawn, Kansas - Docket No. EL 16999.
Dear Sir:
Enclosed herewith please find Application by the City of New Strawn to intervene in our New Strawn franchise case. Very truly yours, Ralph oster RF:LK Enc. cc (w/ene.)- Johm Hmalzer
. - - . i o ...."
DEFORE Tiln fiTATC CORPORATIOt! COM*11SRf 8P1 OF TIIC GTATE OF KANSAS In the ? tatter of an Amended Application ) of Kansas Gas and Electric Company for ) a Limited Certificato of convenience ) and Authority to tran;act businens an an ) Docke t No. 107,167"i liloctric public Utility. in Cof fey County, ) Kansas. ) In the Matter of the Application of Kansas ) Gas and Electric Company for a certificato ) of Convenience and Authority to transact the ) business of a public utility in the State of ) Docket No. 115,213"8 Kansas, transmission rights only in certain ) areas of Coffey County, Kansas.' ) Kansas Gas and Electric Company file L-2396-F,) proposed 7.2/12.5, three phase line to serve )EL 16999 the Town of New Strawn, Kansas ) APPLICATION TO INTERVI:!!!- e PURSUANT TO RULE 82-1-225 (a) b COMCS HOW the City of New Strawn, Kansas (hereinafter referred to as City) a municipal corporation, and requests
' permission of the State Corporation Commission to intervene in the proceedings in the above-captioned matters. In support hereof the City of New Strawn, Kansas respectfully represents and states to the Commission as follows:
- 1. That the residents of this City, at a referendmn elected to confirm a grant to Kansas Gas and Electric Company (hereinafter referred to as KGGE) of a franchise to serve custo-mers within the corporate limits of this City.
- 2. That the residents of this City have by said referen-dum determinod that the granting of the application filed herein by KG6E would be in the best interestse.f the present and future electric customers in the City.
'3. That KG&E requests the Commission in this action to grant to said company an Amended Limited'Certificato of conven-ionce and Authority giving it the right _ to transact business within the corporate limits of the City of New Strawn, Kankan as set forth in its amended application filed in the abovo-entitled action.
- 4. That the Coffey County F. ural Electric Cooperative
.C./.. IN ee
~, ,. b i
t Associatio'n, Inc. (hereinaf ter referred to as Cof fey County) has filed an application for permission to intervene and protest the applications of KG&E for an amended limited certificate of con- \ venience and auth'ority in this City. f .
- 5. That Cof fey County seeks to abdicate this City'n authori O ity under K.S.A. 12-2001 et seq. to grant an olectric f r.inchise by opposing the amendment to KG6C's limited certificate of convenI I
ience in this action.
- 6. That should cof fey County succeed in preventing the amendment of KG&E's limited certificate of convenience by the ,
commission, the City will be ' adversely af fected by such commissiod order in the proceeding. j WIIEREFORC , the City of New Strawn, Kansas, hereby applies g b- for PMr.'ssion to intervene as a matter of right intheseproceedl i ings, pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practice and procedur? 82-1-225 (a), and permission to participate fully as a party in interest in all proceedings related to the applications flies herein. BUCKLUS & HOTil By ' - - gh . Dennis D. Roth , Attorney for City of New St rawn 101 5 4th - nox 206 Durlington, Kansas 66lt 34 (316) 364-5Y)3 STATE OF KANSAS, )
)SS:
COUNTY OF COFFEY.) Dennis D. Roth, of lawful age, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is the City Attorney for the within named inteivenni
.uid So in aut horized to make this veri f ic.il hm in i'. t *. li e n t . t h.it he has read the above and foregoing application, and the nLato-ments therein contained are true.
D:.s Den i
.!~. .-lent h Subscribed and sworn to before me thin d.sv of h sid, , ,
no o %cG2. _. ry Publi My Commission expires:Mu,O 159 a I .
. = n :=.
0 4
- C .
,\
w.. g e- .., s -4 , ~ -
* ~*
- Certificato of M-iling e
I, Dennis.D. Roth, attorney for the Cit.y of New .9trawn, . Kansas, intervenor herein, certify that I served copies of
'the foregoing application to interveno on the fol10 wines named attorneys:
L.R. Ilannen 100 North Third Burlington, Kansas 66839 James M. Caplinger, Chartered 823 West Tenth Street i Topeka, Kansas 66612 Ralph Foster, Esquire Kansas Gas and Electric Building Post Offic 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 by mailing the copies on August 4,1978, United States certified mail return receipt requested, postage propaid.
- ~- ~% ~ rA _ ' 7nnis D. Hoth b
4 i. 4 s 7dU,.'.. IN '
% s-.
,.\ e . . .? . ,; a ..
7 .-
- Tl~ ?R 1) KANSAS ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES,INC.
R. "' ' . ." .9s J a"g- g. u . ny sm west r,sr sracer . TePro . AC m rre .r.o oci r Ps
- UAILING AD09tSS P O. BOE ditt . CAGE CENTER SrAriCN . TOPEK.A. ONSAS %E04 CHARLES RC$$ ,
o.a.<.: u.a.ser B.10-36 October 11, 1978 - O Mr. Steven D. Carter, Secretary Kansas Corporation Commission. - State Office Building , Topeka, Kansas 66612 Regarding: Docket No. 107,167-U, Docket No. 115,213-U and Docket No. EL 16999 , .I
Dear Mr. Carter:
On behalf of Kansas Electric Cooperatives, Inc., please find enclosed an original and five copier of an Application to Intervene and Protest of Applications in the above referenced matter, together.with a certificate of Service. Respectfully submitted, p cusT. r. rexA. daw & 6,xIsd /. *
, Rg Bernard R. Phillips, II' Attorney, d'I"'_?;_~_z
_ m.u rp ZE'.I _
- c. : . . . . .
E_ 105iT 4 . ..._ a v:- c. ' . Enclosures Ja: ; -. X! . ._.
~~
1 's
._,.>i,,= . . _
J 4Liri .
.JD;': i..
E di.T.1T , __ AD- . . . . _.34.L.:C' . _T t.!! . .
. ._:_wis .
_ W1?.U. tl ~ V FILE 4 e '
BEFORE THE STATE ColiPORATIO3 COMM76SICH T THE STATE T KANSAS In the Matter of an Amended Application ) of Kansas Gas and Electric Company ) for a finited Certiftrate of Cor.vonience 1
) Ducket No. 107,167-U and Authority to trannant business as an Electric Public Utility in Coffey County, 1 )
C Kansas. In the Matter of the Application of Kansas ) Gas and Electric Company for a certificate ) of Convenience and Authority to transact the ) Docket No. 115,213-U business of a public utility in the State of ) Kansas, transmission rights only in certain ) areas of Coffey County, Kansas. ) Kansas Gau nd Electric Company file ) L-2396-F, proposed 7.2/12.5, three phase line)EL 16999 to serve the Town of New Strawn, Kansas. ) AP P LI CATp!_FQ P E1011 S S T_0N_TO _T pTERVI:N E A!!D Pih701:ST 0F APPLICATI0HS C(MES NOW the Kannan Elect ric Cooperatives, Inc. , anel rixpu.st n permission of the State Corporation Commission to intervene in the pro-coedings in'the above-captioned matters. In support hetcof, Kansas Electric Cooperatives, Inc., respectfully represents and states to the Commission as follows:
- 1. That the Kansas Electric Cooperatives, Inc., is a Kansas corpora-
. tion, duly incorporated, and is in engaged in business in Kansas, with its principal office in Topeka, Kansas.
- 2. Kansas Electric Cooperatives, Inc., is an association of thirty-eight rural electric cooperatives doing business throughout the State of Kansas, as public utilities, as tT2t term is defined by K.S.A. 66-104, under the jurisdiction of the Kansas Corporation Commission.
- 3. The application filed by Kansas Gas and Electric Company requests the Commission to grant it certificated authority in areas aircady certificated to Coffey Ccunty Rural Electric Cooperative Aesn., Inc.
and made exclusive territory by K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 66-1,170 et. seq., and the agreement of the parties by maps filed with the Commission.
- 4. Kansas Electric Cooperatives, Inc., objects and is oppcsed to the granting of the applications and its members would be adversly af-fected by a Commission order granting the requests of the applicar.t.
- 5. The granting of the applications filed herein would not be in the interests of the present and future electric customers situated in the territory involved or elsewhere and the intent of the Kansas Legislature as set forth in K.S.A. 66-1,170 et, seq.
g
. WHEREFOR.E -, th6 Kansas Elt ctric Cooperatives, Inc. , hereby applies ." fcr peraission to interven,* in then, procce<Jingn, pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Practico and Procedure, 32-1-225, and permission to participate fully -as a party in interest in all croceedings related to the applications filed heroin.
Respectfully submitted, . By i
* - * !.' W~ //.)Nt'*~ ' 'r O Bernard R. Phillips, III Attorney for Kansas Electric Cooperatives, Inc.
5709 H. 21st Street Topeka, Kansas 66604 STATE OF KANSAS )
) SS:
COUNTY OF SHAWNEE) Bernard R. Phillips, III, of lawful age, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is the Attorney fr r the within ner-cd Applicant, and that he has read the above and foregoli.9 Application J.nd that the statementr. therein contained are true and correct to his int'ormation, knowledge and belief.
,( . . . < ,..' f.) s/.. .Y, ;u.?
Bernard R. Phillips, III j' ,,omne,,,,$4gribed T,. ,h, [ , and sworn to before me this //ddday of October,1978. l34.o%;{% f ETAftw#ct : 3
! *s\
i in ! .
' ,t/f /k' a.
Y't,(*g*0h g'{*[,./ ,,#' N6tary Public My [*s ion expires ,
, /3,, / # f6 CERTIFICATE CF SERVICE I, Bernard R. Phillips, III, attorney for Kansas Electric Cooperatives, Inc., certify that a true r.nd correct copy of the fore-going Application was deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, on October 11, 1978, addressed to the folicwing:
Wilson Cadman P.O. Box 203 Wichita, Kansas 67201
- James M. Caplinger, Chartered 823 W. 10th Street Topeka, Kansas 66612 L. R. Hannen, Esquire 100 N. Third Burlington, Kansas 66839 Dennis D. Poth, Esquire 101 South 4th Stre:st Box 206 Burlington, Kansas 66839 ,> .h,,C'~'v r.-
_. .. . . . ., . e , 1, . . , . , ,
2.10-37 . ' sr.r. p - , r..m . .ee u.c tme.e. ,., As 48$0 Ontng[Jjiors noeger 9. etunett s. - Off90963 $$O98 V
- o. f. stoni vass esease ca Few* Hoor. $sete owe tidg.
wnuaas o. osar c ,- m vis.in am aeosaae C. testsi Lova c. TOP (KA, KAN$A$ 666Q stevees p. caette s w.,r
'" " # DISTRIBUTION Fiebach O Cadman D Evans /
Foster Walker Hansen Koester October 17, 1978 Hartford
. Haden Mr. Ralph Fiebach, President Kansas Cas and Electric Company P.O. Box 208 Wichita Kansae 67201 Dear Sir p
We are enclosing a certified copy of order in Docket No.'s 107,167-U, 115.213-U and EL 1699s, as entered by the Cownission on the 9th day of October, 1978. Yours very truly, STATE CORPORATION COP 9tISSION
- c. ' t.
DI.444.s Betty Crouch Acting Secretary
? cusi$liN asFPI.cmud.
ejc ,J "tctma @
"* , E N ME!
L
.. u- I . .'$,v$eY
_~_ - _ ff 31 A
, _ N W1A9 _
_ SWW - _h r r F1164 J'AleLES - - J NAWS-J4s PS - J*,f 477 J24 &f.- _ S f3 ..__
. .f E a .. .. ta a .
m . I "= J M.4lh* ..=.. Jt. $
e e o STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION STAE OF KANSAS G N? 25710
- o. T. VAN sesses wsMaas C osAr, s. C RAUS TO ALL TO WHOM THESE FRESEV. IS SHALL COME, CREETINGS:
BET 1T I. CROUCH I,SemenomaGinest Acting Secretary of the State Corporation C, --' - ' =.of the State of Kansas,do hereby certify that the foRowing and hereto attached is a true copy of b ORDER In the matter of an amended application of Kansas } DOCKET NO Cas and Electric Company for a limited certificate ) 107'167-U of convenience and authority to transact the business ) as electric public utility in Coffey County, Kansas. ) In the matter of the application of Kansas can and ) F.lcri rle Company for n cert if f rat e of ronveninwe asul ) IW OT NO. authority to transact the business of a public utility ) 115'21 M in the State of Kansas, transmission rights only in ) certain areas of Cof f ey County, Kansas. ) l Kansas Ces and Electric Copmany file L-2396-F, proposed) DOCKET NO. 7.2/12.5, three phase line to serve the town of New ) EL 16999 Strawn, Kansas. ) the original of which is now on Ble and a matter of record in this esee. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I horses set soy head as:1 esssed es be assed the seal of the State CArporalise r% lith Does et the Qty of Topeka, tWs October, 1978. g
. .f.l.k.'
b t.u c d !.-
./
e -- - -e,.---,-,,,,.---->-w-,----w,--,--,s. , ,.- ,-,,,- ,---- , ,--,------,--.-v--w-,-,.----,-,----,.----e--,--,c_-A, ww- ,,,,..--e--mn,ww, wemm -,,
THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Before Commissioners: G. T. Van Bebber, Chairman william G. Gray O R. C. Loux In the mattar of an amended application) of Kansas Gas and Electric Company for ) a ILaited certificate of convenience ) Docket No. 107,167-U and authority to transact business as ) an electric public utility in Coffey ) County, Kansas. ) In the matter of the application of ) Kansas Gas and Electric Company for ) a certificate of convenience and ) authority to transact the business of ) Docket No. 115,213-U
. a public utility in the State of )
Kansas, transmicsion rights only in ) l'h certain areas of Cof fey County, Kansas.) Kansas Gas and Electric Company file ) L-2396-F, proposed 7.2/12.5, three ) Docket No. EL 16999 phase line to serve the town of ) New Strawn, Kansas. }- 0RDER Now, on this 9th day of October, 1978, there comes on for consideration and determination by the State Corporation Cossaission of the State of Kansa's, the motion of Kansas Gas and Electric Company for leave to take depositions or in the alternative for the appointment of a pre-heoring examiner to take testimony. Having examined the motion and thereby being advised in all the premises, the Commission finds and concludes that:
- 1. On October 4, 1978, Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KG&E) filed with the Commission a motion for leave to take deposition or in the alternative for the appointment of a pre-hearing examiner to take testimony.
- 2. The motion alleged that depositions were necessary in this docket to take the testimony of Helen Lee and Robert D.
Holl, who were residents of Wichita, Kansas, but who now reside in Branson, Missouri. The motion further allegott that Helen Lee and Robert D. Holl would be unwilling to come to f Topeka, Kansas, to testify in this docket because of their _ migration to Branson, their business commitments and their l l -- _
= . I t) i f . I o
lack of interest in this matter. It was also stated that Helen Lee and Robert D. Holl could provide testimony which would indicate that they were unable to develop a mobile home park in New Strawn, Kansas, because of an inability to obtain adequate electric service.
- 3. Acknowledging the provision in the commission's Q
Rules of Practice and Procededure which does not permit deposition (K.A.R. 82-1-234), KGEE requested in the alter-native that an examiner be named for the purpose of taking Helen Lee and Robert D. Holl's testimony in Branson, Missouri.
- 4. Based on the foregoing, the cotanission will not permit depositions to be taken in this matter. K.A.R. 82-1-234 prohibits the use of deposition, and the Conuaission does not p' find it proper to deviate from its regulation in this matter.
Moreover, we find that it would be inappropriate to appoint an examiner for the purposa cf taking testimony. From KG6E's motion, it does not appear that the testimony of Helen Lee and Robert D. Holl would be germane to the proceedings in this docket. IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COMMISSION ORDERED that the motion herein be, and hereby is, denied. The Commission retaine jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter for the purpose of entering such further order or orders as it may deem necessary. Van Bebber, Chan.: Gray, Com.; Loux, Com. Betty I. Crouch, Acting secretary WAHitw
~ gyan WMis @IY
B.10-38 Messrs Ralph Foster Gill Altmer OctoLer 13, 10/3 b ' Dennis Evans had' occasion to visit with Otis Jones in New Strawn October 17. In the course of the conversation, Jones indicated that he had not heard if specific arrangenents had been made for various !!cw Strawn poopic to teet with r.CSE people prior to the KCC hearing on Octoter 24.
!!r Evans is suggesting that specific arrangewnts be rade with I'essrs Dennis P.oth, C M Boyce and Otis Jones as to where wa s!.ould neet, what tice, etc. to review the caso prior to the hearing.
l l l Vit/ck cc - flessrs Warren Wood-John Healzer
z D.lo-39 10/20/78 0 - Warren Wood was down. ou will be asked to testify on Tue,sday re New Strawn.
? ,J., , . : ./ - ,yi . ,, e . ......,.'.<./. .' , ' U, . < .
Be ble to testify that the nearest agent lives in, /,Mor /. p'
- 1. Customer serv,1ce.
LeRoy, approximately 20 miles froai New Strawn and agent-type work he/"-
,u n ,
can o .p:. ,,,n that
- , ojerform v , ).capacity
* .wp a., :alreo.outages.,--
c u.. . . , -, ,dtyppof u ym. ser ice agents 4os. > ,,, provide.'yy,p. y.. ' Nearest line crew is in Humbo'Idt, approximately 50 mil s from New v .7b . g Qt
- 2. Wood ^ ~>u 'f ,,
Strawn. Generally, what type of service line crew provides.-- barring any catait assumes any type of service agent can't provide 4}}