ML19330C418

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Clarifies City of Brownsville Position Re Drafts of Possible Transmission Provisions Included in Overall or Separate Settlement Agreement.Meeting of All Parties to Reach Agreement on Transmission Arrangements Urged
ML19330C418
Person / Time
Site: South Texas, Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/1980
From: Spiegel G
SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID
To: Chanania F, Rosso D, Sampels M
ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE, NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), WORSHAM, FORSYTHE, SAMPELS & WOOLRIDGE (FORMERLY
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8008080357
Download: ML19330C418 (1)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _

a

~

LAW OKtCES GacRCE SpiaGEL.

  • C.

SPIEGEL & MCDLmMID eCNNis S.sLArm hMC

).STRE 2600 VIRGINIA AVENUE, N.W.

SC AuGE OR O N O ^ *

h NC S E FRANCl3 MARCR PCR Of.NIEL L Q AWlCSON TELECOPiER f202) 333 2974 M Ag7A 4, u ANiggi TH3 M AS N. McHUG H. JR.

JCSEPH L VAN EATCN NTNIME"'"

~

July 28, 1980 32.vlO R. STRAUS Merlyn D. Sampels, Esq.,

Fredric Chanania, Esq.

Worsham, Forsythe.& Sampels Nuclear Regulatary Commission 2001 Bryan Tower Washington, D. C.

20555 Suite 2500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Robert Fabricant, Esq.

Department of Justice Michael I. Miller, Esq.

P. O. Box 14141 David A. Rosso Esq.

Washington, D. C. 20044 Isham, Lincoln & Beale One First National Plaza John A. Cameron, Jr., Esq.

Suite 2400 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chicago, Illinois 825 North Capitol Street Washington, D. C.

2042 4

Charles G. Thrash, Jr., Esq.

k COEEE3 Baker & Botts 3000 One Shell Plaza 05NRO Houston, Texas 77002

~AUG 5Ea $

I"tr f

Re: Housten Lighting & Power Company, et al

&am *y (South Texas Profect, Units 1 and 2) 4, NRC Docket Nos. 50 498A, 50-499A 9'

Texas Utilities Generating Company, et al (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2)

NRC Docket Nos. 50-445A, 50 446A Central Power & Licht Comoany, et al FERC Docket No. EL 79-8 Drafts of Settlement Transmission Provisions Gentlemen:

The Public Utilities Board of the City of Brownsville, Texas would like to clarify its position on the various drafts of possible transmission provisions to be included in a possible overall settlement agreement (or separate settlement agreement) for resolving the above-referenced outstanding FERC and NRC proceedings, as proposed by the three Companies.

Brownsville is unwilling to accept any total settlement and therefore any incividual case settlement unless there are specific rates, terms and conditions concerning transmission wheeling services for all types of bulk power wheeling:

D503 6'0 800808035?'

g

.Page 2 July 28, 1980 (a) to, from and over the DC interconnections (if DC can be justified as part of the settlement); and (b) throughout the ERCOT area; upon a mutually agreed basis. Such rates would then be made effective at the time of settlement, subject to subsequent change as follows:

(i) by unilateral filing, subject to refund, where only increased costs, accruing after the effective date, are being flowed through into the rates; or (ii) after hearings or opportunity for hearings and regulatory approval of a filing, where the Applicant seeks to change the rate design or structure or underlying cost allocation methods.

While there are other important aspects of the proposed settle-ment which still raise serious unresolvad questions, we see no point in addressing these unless agreement can be reached on the transmission arrange-ments and rates. We will be happy tc enega in serious discussions re-garding transmission with any party to the proceeding, but we urge an all-party meeting to seek agreement on transmission.

After that, other aspects of the proposed settlements can be addressed.

Sincerely, George Spi 1

r Attorney for the Public Utilities Board of the City of Brownsville, Texas GS/nzb-cc:

All parties-Mr. Robert E. Roundtree John W. Davidson, Esq.

i