ML19330C109
| ML19330C109 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/10/1980 |
| From: | Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Wild C AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008070563 | |
| Download: ML19330C109 (3) | |
Text
f.. %e o'-
UNITED STATES v
l e,-
[
' e, i JCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20$55
,8 o
,o UULY IOg Ms. Carolyn L. Wild 110 C. Stoney Lane Dover, PA 17315
Dear Ms. Wild:
I am writing in response to your recent letter to President Carter which was forwarded to the Nuclear Regulatory Cormission (NRC).
In your corre-spondence, you expressed concerns regarding the delay in placing Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No.1, back into service, and the rate structure prescribed for the Metropolitan Edison Company.
As you may be aware, the NRC has ordered that a public hearing be conducted to determine whether the facility should be operated and, if so, under what conditions.
The public hearing is scheduled to begin this fall.
During the hearing, the technical issues appropriate to assure public health and safety will be addressed.
The NRC staff is currently involved in the on-going review of technical information concerning the restart of Unit 1.
Based upon the current status of the proceedings, the development of a record on which the NRC can make a decision regarding restart is not expected before the early part of 1981.
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Comission (PUC) issued on May 23, 1980, a sequel to the PUC's June 19, 1979 Order regarding the allocation of the financial burden resulting from the March 28, 1979 accident at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2.
The following excerpt from the May l
23, 1979 Order may be of interest.
"The basic conclusion of the Comission in this order is that Met Ed i
should continue to operate as a public utility.
The Comission will provide Met Ed the means of financial rehabilitation.
However, we will write no blank checks on its ratepayers.
We find that TMI-1 is no longer used and useful and that the base rates of both Met Ed and Penelec should be redaced.
This order, with its provisions for a fully current recovery of energy costs and an accelerated amortization of deferred energy costs provides an adequate framework for Met Ed's recovery.
Respondent must convince its bank creditors that it has the will and the ability to rehabilitate itself.
Above all, Met Ed must demonstrate candor and a willingness to address its problems and the initiative and ability to find solutions to those problems. The very real fears and concerns of its customers and neighbors must be allayed.
Met Ed's cost must be reduced through load management and conservation-inducing rate structure change.
Met Ed must aggressively pursue the return to service of TMI-1 or an early decision on its conversion to the use of an alternative fuel.
If these things are done, the Commission is confident that Met Ed will not only survive but will regain its financial health.
H 8008070 5A 3
. Finally, we emphasize that this order does not end our regulatory concern.
The management investigation of the GPU Companies at Docket No. I-79080320 continues.
Further, we will continue to closely monitor the operations of Met Ed, Penelec and the GPU Cowanies to assure the continued provision of safe, adequate and reliable service to Pennsylvania ratepayers at reasonable rates."
While we are, of course, concerned about financial impacts on consumers, the NRC's primary responsibility is the assurance of public health and safety. State public utility comissions and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission have primary responsibility regarding the financial aspects of electric power generation.
The former Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) had a Congressional mandate to develop and promote nuclear energy. When the AEC was abolished in 1974, the NRC was created by Congress for the sole purpose of regulating the commercial production of nuclear energy.
The U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) is now responsible for the Federal Government's nuclear research and development activities.
Consequently, comments and questions about the future of this energy source should be directed to that agency.
Your coments and interest in these matters are appreciated.
Sincerely, j
F Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing
i()
J
,J z c-110 C. Stoney Lane Dover, PA 17315 February 20, 1980 The President of the United States Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear President Cgrter
_The generation o/ electricity is vital toa.very cJthen of our country.and.it is a responsib.ili_ty of our government to encourage and support this essential industry.
~ Today we have a situation in Pennsylvania where an electric utility, Metropolitan Edison, that was pioneering an attempt to lessen our dependence on vulnerable and expensive foreign oil is now being forced into bankruptcy by the N.R.C.
Because of the accident at Unit #2 of the T.M.I.
generating plant, which incidentially injured not a single person, the N.R.C.
is refusing to permit Med. Ed. to start up the undamaged Unit #1.
There is absolutely no reason that Unit #1 can not be put on line. Without it, Med. Ed. is being forced by the Penna.
P.U.C. to purchase electricity and provide it to their customers at a lower price at a substantial loss. This is totally unfair and unjustified.
L respectfully urge you to support the. N.R.C. in the _..
/
startup of the undamaged. unit at T.M.I.._
Jr
==
Yours truly,
{n
}
.?
Carolyn I Wild l
1
- - -