ML19330C084
| ML19330C084 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 07/10/1980 |
| From: | Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mitchell L AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008070531 | |
| Download: ML19330C084 (5) | |
Text
,,d2 UNITED STATES b
y 7, p. ( ' (g e
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION w
, g g; %*....,/
- y WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
'AJLY
. 0 1980 Mr. Leo G. Mitchell Kings Point-Brittany "K" 527 Delray Beach, Florida 33446
Dear Mr. Mitchell:
I am writing in response to your recent letter to President Carter which was forwarded to the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC).
In your corre-spondence, you expressed concerns regarding the delay in placing Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No.1, back into service, and the rate structure prescribed for the Metropolitan Edison Conpany.
As you may be aware, the NRC has ordered that a public hearing be conducted to determine whether the facility should be operated and, if so, under what conditions. The public hearing is scheduled to begin this fall.
During the hearing, the technical issues appropriate to assure public health and safety will be addressed.
The NRC staff is currently involved in the on-going review of technical information concerning the restart of Unit 1.
Based upon the current status of the proceedings, the development of a record on which the NRC can make a decision regarding restart is not expected before the early part of 1981.
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Comission (PUC) issued on May 23, 1980, a sequel to the PUC's June 19, 1979 Order regarding the allocation of the financial burden resulting from the March 28, 1979 accident at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2.
The following excerpt from the May 23, 1979 Order may be of interest.
"The basic conclusion of the Comission in this order is that Met Ed should continue to operate as a public utility.
The Comission will provide Met Ed the means of financial rehabilitation.
However, we will write no blank checks on its ratepayers.
We find that TMI-1 is no longer used and useful and that the base rates of both Met Ed and Penelec should be reduced.
This order, with its provisions for a fully current recovery of energy costs and an accelerated amortization of deferred energy costs provides an adequate framework for Met Ed's recovery.
Respondent must convince its bank creditors that it has the will and the ability to rehabilitate itself.
Above all, Met Ed must demonstrate candor and a willingness to address its problems and the initiative and ability to find solutions to those problems. The very real fears and concerns of its customers and neighbors must be allayed.
Met Ed's cost must be reduced through load management and conservation-inducing rate structure change.
Met Ed must aggressively pursue the return to service of TMI-1 or an early decision on its conversion to the use of an alternative fuel.
If these things are done, the Comission is confident that Met Ed will not only survive but wil: regain its financial health.
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS 8008070 $ /
POOR QUAllTY PAGES
o 2
Finally, we emphasize that this order does not end our regulatory concern.
The management investigation of the GPU Companies at Docket No. I-79080320 continues.
Further, we will continue to closely monitor the operations of Met Ed, Penelec and the GPU Conpanies to assure the continued provision of safe, adequate and reliable service to Pennsylvania ratepayers at reasonable rates."
While we are, of course, concerned about financial impacts on consumers, the NRC's primary responsibility is the assurance of public health and safety. State public utility comissions and the Federal Energy Regulatory Comission have primary respor.sibility regarding the financial aspects of electric power generation.
i The former Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) had a Congressional mandate to develop and promote nuclear energy.
When the AEC was abolished in 1974, the NRC was created by Congress for the sole purpose of regulating the commercial production of nuclear energy.
The U. S. Depaccment of Energy (DOE) is now responsible for the Federal Government's nuclear research and development activities.
Consequently, coments and questions about the future of this energy source should be directed to that agency.
Your comments and ir.terest in these matters are appreciated.
Sincerely, Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing i
i
W 41/
ALY A
s Be 1
a h, ri c
tta r dany "K" 527 0
..f 5"...
Flo i 13 De 33446 ar Mr. Mitchell I
- 2.
- s
- am wa wri spo des forw ting in arded n
Mile Isla,d re nce
- e spo to the Nu le to yo "K..
str ns you u tu n
c expr c
Nu le re es ur c
ear Regulato As pr sd e
rec ar S es yo cribed tatio c
et to deter iay be oncer n
u m ry Coletter to e
for the,MUni ns n
what m
re aware During the No.garding th mis io ne t
co di n
whe s
r etr ee n
tio the N aring, Thens. ther, the fa ili opolita1, ba k RL ad n
- 1. going ro s fety will RC
/
a he c
n has nEdis into ay it publ c order n Co er is 2"..
Ba o
s the te hniic he ty sho l sd eview be a
ed v
e rec addr c
ud that mpa aring is ord upo of e
ny.
xpe ted es be a
te hnic l n the s d.
cal c
on e
atedpubli c
he Pe beforwhich is c
oper z.:-
T s heduled et inforThe N cur a
sues r
e thethe NRC n
RC appr a d, t
a status n
s nn opriate toto m tio staf fin equ l sylv a
11 e
f r
ca a ly e
to the Pa ia Publ part is n
n of n
a m ke the conc n ial Isl a
c cur er ing r
assu 23, a d a de pr burde UC's Juic U of 1981. cisio eedings,th n
n n
oc Nu lear S 197 n
tili c
9 n
r re e 19 ty Co Order tatio u
n r
s lting fr,197 mis io rding rthe d ega "Theba ic may be,f Uni n
9 s
vt e
om No. the Mar hOrder n (PU ) is e tart s
s o
t sho lud C
inter
- ss re pr 2
c co 28,garding the oi c
te de Meto tinun lu io v
n c
s e t.
T ud cd s
wri he follo i e
s 197 o
e to n
allon May u
9 sd no b Ed of e
la k the oper tethe Co ng e w
a be ci ad c de t n
n a
c tio a
r us m
n of edu xc c d. eful che ks mis io erpt at Thr eans as n
e c
s en of a
oi ergy This pr fr tha nits ina public n in this om the ad o
f n
ee v
des c
co n ial utili o ts order,t the baatepayer.ehabilit s
c nvin r
an r hab and r
order is th ty.
c e
adequ te fr ei an with se s
ili ts ba k The a
ac tate i r
e its ates We findatio. Co c ler ted Abov n
at cr ame a
pr ts lf. edito of n
e w
its all o isio both Ho s
w v
e ork am pr b, Met s thatfor Metortiz tions fo w
n r
TMI e pr bo le v
wi o le a
Ed 1 er, w s
ms ms Ed g
mu t it E 's a fully c ad is e
a m
d n
ut ha n
ad be. The nd s
P no-of allayed. y rthe ini demo s the n
recov en le d
e ver el tiativnstr te will ery.efer cons ur 18 pur c
ret s
rd sue er n
e a
a to the thev tio -indu a
Respo de t Met E ' fears rec ad en n
ca do the n ergy e
is n
n ad n
d r tu use ch e
r ad abili co f s
abili m
os he la th. i n
n ad n
r n to cing r te mu t n
of cot concerns de t an s
ty to findwillingn ty to ut a
s n
a s
s that alter er ice ' tr be v
s of Met nativ u tur edu its es c
r u tos lutios to o
Ed T
e fu l. MI-1 change. thr cd c
e e
will s
n addr e
s to thos nt If or o
mers ess ugh o
an o ly sthe Met ad lo d n e thingsearly de isi n
s
\\
~ 9:y.
..c:a:: -
a Ed ni e
e man u
age ghbo r iv c
mu t v
s rs
- N
- $::/
e but ar on aggr ent m
e o
e E'
/
will don, nits s iv ly s
e e
.... ~ ::
egain ithe Co r
conv SN
' ; g. :j:.
ts finamis s
Y q
n
.j ncial
\\
h,)
3:-
\\
llL';;
..~.
- =
.1.
[' [
[
,~,
O f7 b-/ '
gf 30, 3 Ma' hffs '
.J h
- 'kb Of,,
m f
.i I
/
/ A)n
' O' Dy
'%l w
b M
i
& & ~ fe e
pm 10w%
A_ _ _
y c
.7
.Q L
s.
a
- 2 B _ N L,%
7,.-
e
- 1. _ is f
e mg-g W
.g.-.y k"
(fic~~cM '5X 47X/ndt
~
L & g#j w 6-
'y NW w-wa s i
w-
' %m % *'
,y O
A k7'4-3 "77
,f D.
i/
^
.22~L%
W
?YL
^
A
~t.
r
[
j-f 9kad~~4~t I /*
tA A-f
&1 du
<E44J 22$/,^
V i
ir A
,