ML19330C066

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to FW Kerscher Re TMI-1 Restart Delay & Met Ed Rate Structure.Restart Decision Expected 1981,after Technical Issue Hearing Completion.Nrc Primarily Concerned W/Public Health & Safety.Doe Responsible for Energy R&D
ML19330C066
Person / Time
Site: Crane  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/10/1980
From: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Kerscher F
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
NUDOCS 8008070505
Download: ML19330C066 (4)


Text

._

pa carg k

UNITED STATES

[\\

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 74 '

/.S E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 WlY 10 cao

+

Mr. Francis W. Kerscher Kerscher Metal Service Co.

100 East Mason Street Green Bay, Wisconsin 53405

Dear Mr. Kerscher:

I am writing in response to your recent letter to President Carter which was forwarded to the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC).

In your corre-spondence, you expressed ~ concerns regarding the delay in placing Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No.1, back into service, and the rate structure prescribed for the Metropolitan Edison Company.

As you may be aware, the NRC has ordered that a public hearing be conducted to determine whether the facility should be operated and, if so, under what conditions. The public hearing is scheduled to begin this fall.

During the hearing, the technical issues appropriate to assure public health and safety will be addressed.

The NRC staff is currently involved in the on-going review of technical information concerning the restart of Unit 1.

Based upon the current status of the proceedings, the development of a record on which the NRC can make a decision regarding restart is not expected before the early part of 1981.

The Pennsylvania Public Utility Comission (PUC) issued on May 23, 1980, a sequel to the PUC's June 19, 1979 Order regarding the allocation of the financial burden resulting from the March 28, 1979 accident at Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2.

The following excerpt from the May 23, 1979 Order may be of interest.

"The basic conclusion of the Commission in this order is that Met Ed should continue to operate as a public utility.

The Comission will provide Met Ed the means of financial rehabilitation.

However, we will write no blank checks on its ratepayers. We find that TMI-1 is no longer i

used and useful and that the base rates of both Met Ed and Penelec should j

be reduced.

This order, with its provisions for a fitlly current recovery of energy costs and an accelerated amortization of deferred energy costs provides an adequate framework for Met Ed's recovery.

Respondent must convince its bank creditors that it has the will and the ability to rehabilitate itself.

Above all, Met Ed must demonstrate candor and a willingness to address its problems and the initiative and ability to find solutions to those problems. The very real fears and concerns of its customers and neighbors must be allayed.

Met Ed's cost must be reduced through load management and conservatian-inducing rate structure change.

Met Ed must aggressively pursue the return to service of TMI-1 or an early decision on its conversion to the use of an alternative fuel.

If these things are done, the Comission is confident that Met Ed will not only survive but will regain its financial

health, s u 0 8 070 505

o 2

Finally, we emphasize that this order does not end our regulatory concern.

The management investigation of the GPU Companies at Docket No. I-79080320 continues.

Further, we will continue to closely monitor the operations of Met Ed, Penelec and the GPU Conpanies to assure the

' continued provision of safe, adequate and reliable service to Pennsylvania ratepayers at reasonable rates."

While we are, of course, concerned about financial impacts on consumers, the NRC's primary responsibility is the assurance of public health and safety. State public utility comissions and the Federal Energy Regulatory Comission have primary responsibility regarding the financial aspects of electric power generation.

The former Atomic Energy Comission (AEC) had a Congressional mandate to develop and promote nuclear energy.

When the AEC was abolished in 1974, the NRC was created by Congress for the sole purpose of regulating the comercial production of nuclear energy.

The U. S. Department of Energy (D0E) is now responsible for the Federal Government's nuclear research and development activities.

Consequently, coments and questions about the future of this energy source should be directed to that agency.

Your comments and interest in these matters are appreciated.

Sincerely,

W f

Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #4 Division of Licensing

.c..

t W

<>/#

KMS

~

KERSCHER METAL SERVICE CO.

/

100 EAST M ASON ST., GREEN BAY,WIS. 54305 PHONE 432-2911 AREA CODE 414 P O. BOX 787 Tim lionerable J J cr:1e Cr rter President of the United Sto tes

.lo chinj ton,

D.

C.

20$00 t'ebruary M, 1030

Dear 1:

r. P"oaldent, I am 2r i t i ng to... fg1L_i n recar<i to the financial ab$ ll_ty_canc Giaw:;ul F_o%ic Utilitica Gorport tidiBT :t?:_rlif l.iislum 3.

- - - ~ ~...

..,.. ~

I suru 5,o p - thuy don't hrva to fold up beetune there are nany foun-dations. pension a nd s o L'a r t! that <wve invested tuoney in the utilities.

I believe they hnve saown ta t' : world th it nuclear poser 1:. utill < a2a end I don't think thera r auld be auch a conti r:ued acly Jn lettin t,aem c

, Cc back into operation af ter they ' ave corrected their nintakes.

Please expedito their reuumption to nanufactur power ugnin.

1 Very truly yourc3 An a L......, t u, -,,u.,,. L

o.,..1,/ I L,a.,

L, U.

um 1

'.DOpleL'1r bd.$'hA3I'Lb nacw u. uwanwww 1"E:ru YOUR HELPFUL WHOLESALERI GREEN BAY MANITOWOC MAD! SON MILWAUKEE ROCK ISLAND

. _.