ML19330B447
| ML19330B447 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1980 |
| From: | Ridgway D METROPOLITAN EDISON CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Aamodt M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19330B443 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008040031 | |
| Download: ML19330B447 (2) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _
anLATED CORRESPONDN UN oj s-Lic 7/29/80 M'
g
- tsNRG 6:
JUL 3 01993 > qi gnpst UNITED STATES OF AMERICA gI 00dl80 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
//
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
/
y In the Matter of
)
)
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-289
)
(Restart)
(Three Mile Island Nuclear
)
Station, Unit No. 1)
)
LICENSEE'S INTERROGATORIES TO INTERVENOR MARJORIE M. AAMODT ON REVISION 2 OF LICENSEE'S EMERGENCY PLAN These interrogatories are filed pursuant to 10 C.F.R.
S 2.740b, which requires that the interrogatories be answered separately and fully in writing and under oath or affirmation, and the Board's Memorandum and Order of July 15, 1980, autho-rizing discovery requests based upon new information in Revi-sion 2 of Licensee's Emergency Plan.
The schedule for respond-ing to these interrogatories is set forth in the referenced Board Memorandum and Order.
1.
Revision 2 to the Emergency Plan includes a new Sec-tion 4.6.1 dealing with the emergency notification of offsite agencies.
Section 4.6.2.2.2 has been revised to indicate that Licensee's Public Affairs Representative is to be included in the initial set of notifications.
Section 4.7.5 has been sub-stantially expanded to include a fuller description of various communication options, including an identification of backup 8008040 0 3 [
4 means for notifying various offsite agencies.
In addition, a t-new Emergency Public Information Plan has been included as Ap-pendix B.
(a)
In light of these changes, do you still main-tain that the concerns set forth in Contention No. 4 are valid?
(b)
If so, explain the basis of your conclusion.
2.
Appendix D to Licensee's Emergency Plan now includes the current version of the emergency response plan of the Pennsyl-vania Department of Agriculture, which is Appendix 7 to the State Plan.
Section V and Annex B of the emergency plan of the Agriculture Department include a discussion of protective action ~
options for livestock.
(a)
In light of this change, do you still main-tain that the concerns set forth in Contention No. 5 are valid?
(b)
If so, explain the basis of your conclusion.
Respectfully submitted, SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE By:
fuNs, k kh n2k
' "I Robert E. Zdhldr
('
Delissa A. Ridgway Dated:
July 29, 1980
_ _.