ML19330B001
| ML19330B001 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/15/1980 |
| From: | Ippolito T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Glagola A NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-03-79-118, CON-NRC-3-79-118 NUDOCS 8007300016 | |
| Download: ML19330B001 (5) | |
Text
-
s'hEtcy, f
[0,;
UNITED STATES y
A, e g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 *,
j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g-
,/
July 15,1980 S
MEMORANDUM FOR:
A. Glagola, Eva'Jation Co-ordinator, Technical Assistance Contracts P.anch, Division of Contracts FROM:
T. A. Ippol'to, Branch, Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of t.icensing
SUBJECT:
FRANKLIN RESEARCH CENTER (FRC) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:
LWR PRIMARY COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE ISOLATION VALVES Attached are the evaluations of contractor (Franklin Research Center) perfomance under NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-ll8 for the period from contract initiation through June,1980 regarding Division of Licensing -
~
Generic Activity B-45, " LWR Primary Coolant System Pressure Isolation Valves."
J 5 C de Thomas A. Ippolito, (Perfomance Monitor)
Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 Division of Licensing Attac hnent:
As stated cc:
E. Butcher 4
pa07 p"j>
i 8.0073900/4,
~
ci EVALUATION OF F.R.C. PERFORMANCE
\\
FOR THE PERIOD FROM 5-1-80 THROUGH 5-31-80 Evaluation Area -
Overall Adjective Overall Numerical Management & Schedule Rating - Superior Rating - 30 points - 100".
Criteria:
l.
Ability to Meet Schedule Milestones Evaluation:
Superior Numerical Rating - 10 coints - 100%
The contractor has been very effective in meeting schedules for work products.
2.
Program Imorovements Evalua tion:
Superior Numerical Rating - 10 points - 100%
The contractor has developed an adequate staff to maintain the proper flow of work products.
Further, the contractor has developed a suitable procedure for assuring that positions are concurred in by the NRC staff.
3.
Ability to Adjust to Chancing needs Evaluation:
Superior Numerical Rating - 5 Doints - 100%
The contractor has shown good flexibility in responding to NRC staff guidance on the conduct of primary coolant system pressure isolation valve reviews and in recovering from schedule slippages.
4.
Effectiveness of Liaison Effort Eval ua tion:_ Superior Numerical Rating - 5 points - 100%
The contractor has continued to traintain effective liaison with the NRC staff for the management of the program and the resolution of technical issues.
i signature of Performance Monitor Da te
~~?c6 N' 7/s/Ts Thomas K.'Ippolito m
EVALUATXON OF F.R.C. PERFORMANCE FOR THE PERIOD FROM 5-1-80 THROUGH 5-31-80 Evaluation Area -
Overall Adjective Overall trumerical Technical Rating - Superior Rating - 48 points - 96%
Criteria 1.
Thoroughness & Accuracy of Work Evaluation:
Excellent Numerical Rating - 19 ooints - 95%
The contractor's draft Technical Evaluation Reports and draft acceptance criteria
~
reviewed by the staff have been very good since little or no rework was required.
The TER's are very well organized and, in general, adequately document the cor. tractor's rationale for positions taken and recommendations.
2.
Independence & Initiative Evaluation:
Superior Numerical Rating - 20 points - 100% '
The contractor has required considerably less staff direction. The contractor has definitely exercised initiative in developing suitable work products.
3.
Clarity & Conci eness Eval ua tion: Excellent Numerical Rating - 9 points - 90%
The contractor's work products have shown marked improvement. They present the issues in an orderly fashion and clearly state the rational for decisions and recommendatisns.
Signature of Perforcance Monitor Da te Thoma
. Ippolito
a EVALUATION OF F.R.C. PERFORMANCE FOR THE PERIOD FROM 6-1-80 THROUGH 6-30-80 Evaluation Area -
Overall Adjective Overall Numerical Management & Schedule Rating - Superior Rating - 30 points - 100%
Criteria:
1.
Ability to Meet Schedule Milestones Evaluation:
Superior Numerical Ratina - 10 coints - 100%
The contractor has been very effective in meeting schedules for work products.
2.
Program Imorovements Eval ua tion:
Superior Numerical Rating - 10 coints - 100%
The contractor has developed an adequate staff to maintain the proper flow of work products.
Further, the contractor has developed a suitaole procedure for assuring that positions are concurrt ! in by the NRC staff.
3.
Ability to Adjust to Changing needs Evaluation:
Superior Numerical Rating - 5 coints - 100%
The contractor has shown good flexibility in responding to NRC staff guidance on the conduct of primary coolant system pressure isolation valve reviews and in recovering from schedule slippages.
4.
Effectiveness of Liaison Effort Eval ua tion:
Suoerior Numerical Rating - 5 coints - 100%
The contractor has continued to maintain effective liaison with the NRC staff for the management of the program and the resolution of technical issues.
l Signature of Performance Monitor Da te Thomas 'AF Ippoli to e/0 Ed
EVALUATION OF F.R.C. PERFORMANCE FOR THE PERIOD FROM 6-1-80 THROUGH 6-30-80 Evaluation Area -
Overall Adjective Overall Numerical Technical Rating - Superior Rating - 48 points.- 96%
Criteria 1.
Thoroughness & Accuracy of 14ork Evaluation:
Excellent Numerical Rating - 19 coints - 95%
The contractor's draft Technical Evaluation Reports and draft acceptance criteria reviewed by the staff have been very good since little or no rework was required.
The TER's are very well organi:ed and, in general, adequately document the contractor's rationale for positions taken and recommendations.
2.
Indecendence & Initiative Eval uation:
Superior Numerical Rating - 20 points - 1005 The contractor has required considerably less staff direction. The contractor has definitely exercitad initiative in developing suitable work products.
3.
Clarity & Conciseness Eval ua tion:
Excell ent Numerical Rating - 9 points - 90%
The contractor's work products have shown marked improvement. They present the issues in an orderly fashion and clearly state the rational for decisions and recommendations.
i Signature of Performance Monitor Date Y-Thomi[/A. Ippolito G/ l.).W s
a