ML19330A588

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Draws Attention to Two Pleadings That Should Be Treated Separately Although Stapled Together:Nrc Motion for Extension of Time & Nrc/Doj Joint Motion for Clarification & for Establishment of Production Schedule
ML19330A588
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, South Texas  
Issue date: 07/25/1980
From: Chanania F
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Glaser M, Mark Miller, Wolfe S
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
ISSUANCES-A, NUDOCS 8007280620
Download: ML19330A588 (1)


Text

v f)(CEO fe, UNITED STATES o

[,

3 g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

E WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 July 25,1980 Marshall E. Miller, Esq., Chainnan Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C.

20555 Washington, D. C.

20555 Michael L. Glaser, Esq.

1150 Seventeenth Stmet, N.W.

Washington, D. C.

20036 Re: Houston Lighting & Power Company, ~et al.

South Texas Project, Unit Nos.1 & T,-~

NRC Dkt. Nos. 50-498A and 50-499A; Texas Utilities Generating Campany, et al.

Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit Nos.1 & 2, NRC Dkt. Nos. 50-445A and 50-446A Gentlen,an:

It has come to my attention that, inadvertently, the Staff's Motion for Extension of Time was stapled together with the Joint Motion of the NRC Staff and the Department of Justice for Clarification and Motion to Establish a Schedule for Production of Documents when both were filed with the Board and served upon the parties. Obviously, these are two separate and unrelated pleadings, and the Board and the parties should treat them as such.

Sincerely,

$ s D. G Fredric D. Chanania Counsel for NRC Staff cc: All Parties l

0 8067280 m

a