ML19330A281

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to RP Griffin 761015 Referral Forwarding Nd Brown Re Nuclear Plant Safety.Discusses NRC Responsibilities Re Public Health & Safety Protection & Facility QA Requirements
ML19330A281
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 11/22/1976
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Griffin R
SENATE
Shared Package
ML19330A282 List:
References
NUDOCS 8007151082
Download: ML19330A281 (9)


Text

__

l u

4

. f-my

.g;

%y g,,

~

y.. w

.,n geawmvga mgm = 3 x Qm"**

y=*i-1*4QF e

t g

c

~ - 4 F.;N o

. a

. ;w.

x

.m.m.t' /

s x.

e

~

n. :. p p m x~ n y

y.

, u. m un,

'r m,

m.~y :.

.,a

. v.

. r' f j;*..2fi ~

m pw,.

s

~

THIS DOCUMENT,CONTAINS

,d'Mistribution s

.P00R.QUAUTY PAGES:

~

, GErtter (01031)

[j$

~

Docket' File

(

-NRC PDR f hGroff 1

., s Local PDF x EHughes

, a-6...+

T_20 L

Novenber 22, 1976' REDO Reading 1LDreher~ 4NU MF <

iSAVarga f % M

osOw,, MW.g

%g ; NRR Peadinge

  • Mnq%gs;A4.n.n@3N h

~

4

..CMoon 4. W ;" T.fXW"

. c r.

LWR #4 : File

.dhMMMWYD BC ischd UTC RPowell"V d!! NOM" i

~

w me Bonor.abihitod.h. t. P7 3

M.n. m%.. EGCa.s.eS MW~ hSer. vic..d. * %;.O

~ United States Senate '.. Griffin' rY M RSBoyd af C.,JYorep ASLB

[ q GVStel CW Wi 9 Attorney [ ELD JMIller

^f - j$@Q" V.'CA '.(3)

Wasnington M @.* Cn '20510 '

~

..d f'

i IE' (3) J %

'FHeineman:

7

Dear SenatorTGriffin:

JM

,HDenton

% ? _.PVita d

~"

l v.c;;

e m,mgy.

.s u 3 o a

m.,

I am pleased,to respond'to your referral.of October 15, 3 976, wnica. 3" w' "

e. n g J

~7 ss.

c i

forwarded the Detober-12,1976 letter of your constituent; Mr; Neil D. - (

w-Urown. 'Mr. ' Brown'has indicated his concern regarding Units 1 and 2, N i %, l f g

' i c

_of tne M dland Plant which are currently tsk3er constru' tion.

Several of ti.: Brown's ' concerns.were' repeated from his first letter iQ.

cated Septemo.e.r,26, 1976..m. erefore, we now address those matters

.;o'C, * @ %n We are ;inciud.ing tne previous _co' rrespondence &s Enclosure,1. M, letter:y"nIsille of concern toJMr Brown'not responded to 'in our October 6,1976 af g.a V

i

~ our letter dated.cctoberf6,13976,'in response to'your: referral of

  • E i 1

'Septesoer J8',1976,'was; responsive-to E -Brown's concerns stated"in 17 3%

l

- his Septeneer,6JdB76 letter.,v% M." c%. Mie r ?

e t > W@ 4 m r

. w

'2

, q (5w %..,,,,*';

~

m y x,..m :

+4. -f g%+3, L 4 %~ *, W ~ o.Q s

+

^

.a

. ~** :.W "

y

~-

/ Construdtion_.,xy..-upfor-MWlano P) ant Unit 'l. us presently 14 percent complete -47%

a

,n-w..

,e.

.~ ;;

.-~

. Cand construdtioW forfun~it '2 Dis 16'percsnt" complete.* Unit 2'will oe MMi

,, completed ;first?since~ft vill be producing 1onl_y ele $tricityT wtille, YN i

~

7~-

. '.' ' k.4&

Unit";l will. supply l process steam' and electricity.

[

. > 3 : &: v:.

m m-em

,g n

..ww. w u c: g :h bb',

$ s,t

( I.

9

.D.f ~

, [ 2 [ f' a

t J

[ I 4I

{"

I[

(

y we havelinterpreted Mr.tBrown's' specific concern to-be that~it-is.uncafe W to ouildfansoperate i[nuelear powerplant.92elprimar[respoedio,11[it %M.

of.the Nuclear. Regulator.y,Can,ai.s,s, ion (WCV is~ to" protect the health My

~

W~b, m.

y and safety [of-tne public.yTo carrylout this: responsibility th' 'EC

. j.d{

e i

. staff performs a'oetailed review o.f al1 applications for construction

~ permits am(operating licinses forJriuclearipoweriplants, four' Safety %a %M

~

c i

b sour OctabiE6[1976tletitkrlo you".CAdditional 4infordatilon on~

i Evaluntion?Beport for the' Midland ^Plahtkwas protidPkab'hk 90 Closure Eo.-

O ijk Dectiof TmMitypiis

,(dof Nuclear ~ Power'\\" addressed in Endloshisj2{*In8urinq ! Safe'DesignshMMg I

P1antsi"Odilch?eaplains cur procedurds.for7 perfo j

%Q e

j irdesign = reviews"and finspechions%BI rdEthat7nUclsaripowerkpisnts M Me%g,herefis hkw(s_om.MMB.%%M.u-G, M #~ n..

MW6 ej r'isk',Tno =64%Mpmatter how smal1 'in,all'humanfactiv. citi w.4 s

wgw g.

-n a n. gym T

always

" @gfproEedureif6f*adiende[srxi[tedSology'Ar5Tused to pr i

W'

~

l y

therecy; minimize;that risk. iAlthouAone canyhypotnestre a po,tentialEt'o

,. wand f

~ V for mangertto thelpub.l'ic healtn and

'

  • gsg'-Q q Q ;p.

m y.3

,q g f

ptg _

8 WQ Q.+'

'f &,;[ j.4 m. g -:; @h. Q j y-*y y...fy -!.. R~gt:;Qy

.y,,

y J. -

l

. g,. y._ s

%.,c!e m,. y... p, y, w

.s.- -

m

.w

_ e ; Qgy 41 > -;gy.

s '.7, M:f.g5x_*Qy. -

n.

w..

Q

  • r u-

- e.-.

, ~,.

3, 4,,%.s q,a,

m. ;-

s

. te w,, g9.,

,c,,,

'orries >

%p;$

j

,y w

,q,

.=

s

~

n9 s

f5 r

i

. s 3 e,n -

m_

t

.r b

' hu f g? ^Qqa ',$

$$-f _5.? 9 TQ,70%?W ; & f~QQy. ;n,.

?;N&;h LM y;t y % + W. g

~W*

k m (lA. eheW3 t

t

-L m4, g

gg 3 mn 7

p.

Q s

y

\\

b>:

^

mnas w w.a ua,,n J '.;.P ' -T*w Q= t i u. s. oovanasasseer pamtme orrics: ioy4.sas.ess '13p@/ 7. '&"/ ~ h _G._ +4A.

14 ^ 7.n L.a, Forms ABC413 (Rev. M5) ABCM 0240.

~+m u

%w

- m Ap_

7 wgg Kr d As.1-

+

,,g s a i

. 4

~

~

g<

..w,.7 s.

~.1 ]

l l -.

~:

. me Honoracle robert P.' Griffin

  • reactor accioent, nuclear power plants'have nad an excellent nuclear safety record to date,.witn well over 300 reactor years of connarcial l

nuclear power plant experience with no serious accidents. A final j

report 'of a 3-year study to estimate the risks to the public. from l.

potential accidents.In today's large nuclear power plants has teen completed. bAlthougn!tne report WAsii-1400, " Reactor Safety Study,"

concluoes tnat the.rlans associated with operation of present-cay

~ nuclear power plants are alresay very low cccgsred to otner natural and man-made risks, our~continuea attention to reducing tnis already small risk gives addea assurance tnat tnir., excellent safety record j

can be' preserved for present as well as future plants. Enclosure.3 is the news release wnica further discusses this repcrt and how it can te obtained.

.s l

Mr. Erown has indicated [a concern redaroing poor workmanship and procedures ceing used in construction of.tne Mialana. plants. W e Midland plants were issued constructton peraits on recer.cer 15, 1972.

In J970, the Atcraic Energy Comission issued the' quality assurance requiremnts set

.forth in-Appendix-6 of 10 Cra Part 50, '" Quid ity Assurance Criteria i

- for. Nuclear.Fower Plants and Fuel Reprocessing P1 ants," wnich is provided in Enclosore 4.

he requirements set forth in. tnis Appendix L of 10 CFR Fart 50 were the result of our staff's indepth revlew of. problem areas encountered "during 'the construction of plants prior to 1970 and were designed to provide the necessary guide)ines and requirer.ents for an

~7 adequate quality assurance program. Se Midland plant's quality assurance

prograra'has> received.an 'indepth review by our staff and has been I'

y founa to befacceptable.In that it, meets ~the criteria set forta in

. Appendix 8 jf.10 CFR Part 50. The 22;incidsnts'of poor workmansnip greferredqtojbpTMr.isrown were detected, reported, and,d oy the C repaired in faccordance with the quality assurance program. approve mich ~isione.of the primary cojectives of the quality assurance program.

j q%.-

2

._ m l

Mr." Brown ~ also expressed concern about storage of the high-level waste I

products from:.n nuclear plant. -In accordance witir the Energy;,

.~

TeorganizaElon Act "of October 1974, 'tnelEnergy Nesearch and Develop-l sment Adreinistration -(ENDA) is responsible for developing acceptacle l

c 4 ? waste dispois] systems for nign-1evel' wastes. imis' agency is con-i

' 'itin~uirx} Jtoicchduef dstvelo;sentfefforts"on the various available m

[:

_. Joptions forjthe permanent; disposal Lof 'these nuclear wastes at government-

, :7. mP owned facilities'ysnelosurC5;, "Discosal of 'Pa11'oacEive traste," ~

M ' Djoutlines"00ppresenti joethods'and, planned futu(e" action ~s for safelyy " ;

N n a handling $s$% Af'fr %%Qthese wastes; 4 # -. p. i tx

"*a-

.f p

+

l

< n, g ; ' %. '.:.dM a 1

'C

'ry

~~

Q,

+

~

?

~-

yy. 3g,.y. y 9.

- Q && & s ' *

  • OD'%?,W_ l I

p

.s, e

l M "*

f

.-l*& d y.<

t

{

.orric s in-pg

%< e

(

4

> s

+

4

^g, m c.y A.

..+

N N - ~

La w BC 318 (Rev. 9 53) AECM 0240... -ws. dau. % m:e-cxh Mai.ecN;d' w. ~ # u. s.novsamassar pasanne orricas isra.sas.see

- Forse A S 1 Tii w a Au www.4%vahm & C n,s : sG_. %o

.r,

,m w

, +. o a

m~.w~

-n..

w-s,

+

y

.e

,~,r.

msg

=

. e,.

a,m,

. c.

> ~

g g

a,.

w

.g,

,4 4

(

l e.w 7

l

- Tne Honorab]e Rocert' P. Griffin -

t A

This letter is oeing. sent in duplicate and ~the original letter is returned by enclosure. He hope this letter and our letter dated f

October _6, 1976., have been responsive to_Hr. Brown's concerns and C

will assist.you-in;your reply.

,J.

1 m.-

Y r.ni a

.1

.I.-

~,.

Sincerely, v

t

',mf

-r

~

e

}

j.

}

., r..

l 4

'2 William I/ Dircks

~

. v. [.[^

Assistant Executive Director W

for O:_ersions

^

.w.

,y

+

l L

~

.c 2

s.49, Enclosuresi -

~ %

-4 i

1, l.

NRC Imtter of October 6,1976

+

4 2.

Insuring Safe Designs of Nuclear

' s Power LPlantsi W " '

' =

V' t ',

13.

NRC_ News _ Delease No.75-259 I

4.

Appenoix B of 10 Cht Part. 50

5. ; Disposal;of Radioactive waste s

6.

Mr. Brown'..s letter of Octiober 12, 1976'

~

l J,J

_.., e,,.w e

s

'q,

.a Ty

+c,

,e

- q gg,4 '" w,.; p p"4N.;

/

y s

s

~,.,. >

. - ~

s

_s'

.. w*,~. _~*

.s.:.

m,, m #,._.~.,,

i

..e 4

',.=-

I f

  • )

' a<

{

b

.- -,,S

("

j h.

~r n.

~

~

m -j ;m t.

\\

q' :: q'y.j; *L'. gyy 1 p L,

4.. : q;,

p

. m a

m 1

i a

y '..-

2.

s,,.

3 l

, ';. '-C 1.

-k_N:h:o.w'i

.,w -

3 r

w.,.

w y?

,s 9

+ 5 l f3

. f.,_

a ',

v4

  • e

..a...-

c a.

,o w.,

i

,N..'V.[,, gy - :L -.". h,

%. E.'
  • a 4 '

eJ '...+#

--'^

. y I

, ; r,

w'f

(

4

.-3%

yt w

t i

.,9-.' _, -

., 'v wh ;4 M j v.*4

n. s

> - +..e e- -

-e r

_p.

.,.. j, ps, o.. a $,.,,4, g,g.h e

+,*.g t

.g.

. Ac "

L k, ][ f,. ' -

j

_.. ~ _,d,,. y 4.,[g}

. A y

,'f5~

. h '

c.

f;

)} M '

~ * ' * * - h.l77

. en

, g.

e

.e. ra v : ;y ;~ % w.r g: d u, g &4. ~ +.., e s

< ?n, ;e;m

,o,?,

  • ,a, v-

,t*(

s

,.- 3 e

t f

N~.,'

s;%

~

h Sg-lTk ^ h I"[m[,,f'99'";d M 2 k; & (.

,,%?(('. E l

'~

MS,.f; 7-5

  • - ! [ " '

3.' w,, c q L.;,

I,r r -

i p

g-w'.

.y m. x:r" n y,

y,

-w j A W>t ;m,77;.*.;g @,,p*;'fl.Chy ;,+N.4 4 if2%p. p%j w;'

y & '-

,.o

'*'~

. T

~

M"$h

+., M N W M.

g

, Q-.

. i.. 'p f.y,y.g ~%3&:y:{[

,.3 cay v

-_ Q_,.

i

[j-
_ m, w: M-M+Mhhki $$M:$s # N5 "h.w.,*,hb,C

/,',[

O s,-

h.,

.7,.

I N

DN n,a. et v c-w

v. cy p,. s s e.. y a.s,,,9, w.~

,,...../-.

y~

+e

. x n.ya.,a.d. y *yn; ~g-v ;..,-

w.w... :

a v.,

w s

...r.,

p y.

- - y': < %; y m y g y+: g (,,,

q.,;,g ;. ] 1

-\\\\

Ww. -

u-1 e,,

/

t e See Previous Yellow'for W ncg.rrencps T

~ ' - ' ~

..E

.g.

'.mc.

. _D,W

.[

DkM1 J

rb fR.

NPR/h

-ObTdl'

-CA '

~

^

[

_,,,,;,,,, RIT e,

RSBUydU i

~BCRudh LG5ssick

EGC p v

' g.. < -:.. j ;, g 11/)p,/. 76.-11.- -

.11/.. fl'/76i 117

~/763

..[-11/ ' 9 76-11/T,,f/76s.

11/ yV/76 l l

n.

s l

& gg, l

~ W u.e.eovsRMMENT 1974 829944 4

Y Penn ABC 518 (Rev. 9 5)) ABCM 0240 v.u-m v.mAm..L; nm.:s, f Q f 4 -@& &A.3.M91, w.

e w'PMINTING OFFICESg. ;ww. _ _m;,,,g;;;;i:';;;y

.,s.r%m %

d.) >

% f 2

m..

n y

.p.

y,; u,.;

+

' ' JP w,..

.u ?

['

g u -

s

~

, /.,a ~.

"" kN '-

.f

~

$ W Y

f, Y

9 a:

' ~

' A

~

6 Distribution

,.c y-y jDocketFile.

MGroff e

m iM EHughes.

' Local PDR-

~ LDreher

' l

~EDO Reading SAVarga

gt NRR Reading CMoon c.e LWR #4 File M RPowell

.a e :

J ci: 4,

m

'if ",j 7'

' l.BCRusch'e MService

., n;go -

~.

1he'UcNorable' Robert P).briffin[

EGCase DYore, ASLB

" United States Senate '%

~

^

.. RSBoyd

' IE '(3) 9 '~

~"

Washington, D. C; C20510 i,' (

' Attorney, ELD

,JMiller gep MFyf I CA (3)-

_i 7 RHeineman

~

Dear' Senator.Griffid:

Pbb E

~ GErtter (01031)

HDenton h

T J

+'

VStello F

t l

I am pleased to responi to your. referral of Octooer 15, 1976, which forwarded tne Octooer
12,"1976 letter of your constituent,- Mr. Neil' D.

' Brown. - Mr.' Brown' has"iMicated nis' concern regardidge Units 1 ana 2 ' _f.

of tne MidlaM Plant which are currently under cpnstruction.

7

~

^

Several;of. Mr. Brown's1 concerns were. repeated from his first letter

~

I dated September 6, -1976. ' Serefore, we now address tnose matters tof concern to Mr.1 Brown:not! responded,to in,dur' October 6, 1976 letter.,

L.

l We' are including the previous' correspondence as' Enclosure l. ; We believe ][ k l

s l'

,"our letter dated October :6,'.1976, in response to your reterral of. f er s

l sSeptemoer 8,1976, was fresponsive to Mr..' Brown's con 6 erns stated in F:

his September;6,11976. letter f,:.

/

5e, i.:.

sA 2

- " #:$ ' :. \\n y3.',**

f_

q.

3 m

y

+,

Construction'for ' Midland Plant Unit /] is presently 14 tercent comolete A.

8

- and ' construction for Unit ~2 Tis 16 percent comp 1ete. Unit 2 wil1Lbe

[

completas first ? since. fit, will'ba

.eUnit,1:wil15suwly pro 6ess steem(producing only, electricity, wnile. ' M"M

~

and electricity.4.. t

.,. l c

  • 3 :K; w <M,,3.qsg.j5tpn;g, x. < wg 2%

,, f: 3, y.

.,, y v

.,, 2 m

..v

~

~

~

,i We have interpreted;Mr. Brown specific concern to be that~it is unsafF

'n'

' to build,and.operat'e"~a nuclear' power.blant.D 7 tie" primary" respon 4

of the Nuclear ' Regulatory ~C<smaission (NFC) ?is toiprotect the.n'ealth-

" ^@

staff" performs.a detailed /revfew of3all a%is responsioility tne NRC Y and safety;of'the public. A o carry out

~

l pplications'for construction" 7

permita aM operating 'ligenses forinuclear ' power plants. Our Safety g j 7

Eval mt ion Report; for ; tne; PticlaM ! Plant, was c ovided fasfan enclosure tonf'-

e i

w jeciof~ safetyfis addreissedjinJnclosure,2/."our betoberJ6,'1976 letier2to yo J

^

? ^i l

itig Safe Designs 2 -.

t s

. ? Lof,Nuclest'PoweiPlant$s&which(explains our pr

~ uteis for;performinp%g

b - design ' reviews ?and? inspections;to.. assure ;tnat.nuc1 r, p>werj plants # s.. g6 ' U '

M yare. s%jAs; with)evstything'el'ae(it6efe7 is[falways-, disk Knoimatterf M i

+ %< "..how anaII,. in, all h, u.m. st.acti_viti_es. i,,h_ e' NRC Meens.inq,oro, cess,, i.s WG, c.e s

S e:d.est. n.d to'a.ssure that?thE.mos.t.:adva.n.ced pr<oceoures..of science and

.,2,T F

e Y temnol+ogy::are'.used to protectethe public:and thereby>4 -minimize,riskN.4 %; * ',"

Although one'can hypothesize %',x n a w ww w s e c s,;.n.e.O

. ww'm+ & %

w. we s sa n. ~ m p,: c n
..w w 4;n p n.a s m

+< m

  • a a potential for. danger to the ablic.nealth 3

' ' and~to the' envi(onment?fraiala" serious reactor' accident, nuclear power '

2

~

plants have'hadran~; excellent' safety. record to date. -No memoer of

  1. a W M (if)c h b h S Tid, @ %

a. # < ' +,, c;

$ ',i

..an d

mp' T,'

,~-%'-s>.

y

..y.;

no 4

m g-

+ %

g m

c l g,

~

Y'8 ha '

MI[

[M v5

_A 4M M

'Y' j;_r[ k l

L< O & A & ' ? $ 5

^ N $

W W 5 N O &

2 % NO V W E

' Posen ABC 318 (Rev. M5) 'ABCM W40,? *btAl.- i gdC.k(N.$.y W u.a oov.enmusmy rninnme orrecs: ser4.eae.neee i,.r,,g w,;, usa.,a - w.; % % e g m.g:n g N

3. J< sE

  • l.

7 w-m ~,%em um.- a

.a. uy s,

I-

m. - m,.

- n.f :

.. - -.,,v

,,e n

. ~., - m. m ~

c

.r

~~

T-Q

}

y ~.

b~f f&Q

.f.y

./

3,

s..

3 wn,

_ 3;,,~. _

l_

, n

.g..

3, h nonorable Robert P. Griffin ' ~

9 t

.. g 1 7.,

the general public has ever be' n injured oy radiation from an accident I

e l

'at a licensed nuclear, power: reactor..In fact, in well over 20u reactor

years.of comercial nuclear power plant experience, tnere has been i

ino reactor incident of Sany kina causing ractation exposure to a i

member of the",public. ?

y7.;'.

- a ',

r1 u

x g n o. ~ +

1

. s:

n

.r

- A final report of a 3-year, study to estimate the risks to the public.

?

6 I

from potential' accidents _in today's large nuclear power. plants'has been completed.; - me 'reportfEH-1400, '" Reactor Safety Study,"

concludes that the risks associated with operation of present-aay c'

nuclear power plants are;very' low cmpared to other natural.ana man-mace risks. Enclosure 3 is the news releace wnich further discusses tnis 2

report and now it can be~ obtained.-

4 s

~

7, Mr. Isown has ! indicated alconcern ^regarding poor-workmansnip aM procedures j

beingusedinconstruqion'oftheHidlandclants. Tne Miuland plants ' -

h

(

were issued constructi ~ peruits'on Decemoer 15,'1972.

1970, the 1 ;

Atomic Energy Consnission,ssued the quality assurance frements set"

.s fortn in AmendixEB of,10 CPR Part 50,c"Qualicy Ass

,ce Criterla j

for. Nuclear PowertPlants.and tuel.aeprocessing P1 ts,".unich is proviaed J.n j

in Enclosure.4..

%e requiremierits set forth in-is A@endix B of 10 CFR

'Part.50'were tne result 'of,our% staff's indep review of problem areas-Y' 4

' encountered during the construction ~ of plan s prior' to 1970 aru were i

' designed to (provice2ttie.necessary' guide).ines and requirements for an -

a adequate quality assurance program.xTbe Midland plant's quality assurance r

~

r

program has)recefwd'an"indepth' review b
found to be acceptable.in;thatfit,4pers.y our;2taff and has been the criteria set forth in ie.22 incidents of; poor wormanship r

~

~

y Appendix ~B;of110 CFR Part150.g' tected, :r'eported, :an:

] referred 4 o:by:Mr.~ arown%ere' I repaired in

?.

~

~

t accordance with'the quality.

y%fch fis one of' the. primar /attfVance progrgn approved by tne Commission, ectives of t.

cuality assurance program.

n;mo m x.,. y pg

_. 9.,

. [ $ 3.w c.

f;

-r..

LMr; Brown also,expre concern atiout storage f the high-Itvel waste products from a nucle %ar plantsiIn'accordance wi 7 the Energy -

iamorgariization' Actiof)Detocer 1974, the Energy. He ' arch and Ddvelop-O 4

9

~

mant kuninistration ysDA)?is' responsible for devel ~ing acceptable ^ T 1 waste disposal"systslms;fWr"hi'gh;-level? wastes. ; miry

.is con-da ~

~

E i ~ C [J '

C Ctinuing to^ conductidevelspinerit. efforts on tne various.airallable.

i

~

[

joptions for tse,' perma 6sht(disposal of these. nuclear. wastes at government:,.

^

e.

! VowriedTfacilities.fshe16stief,$." Disposal -Of RadioaEtiM'dste,"

M ON out)ln,es4 ob.rfji eent niit 4 d

~

,' 'W1 $nQ rNNse.'e _. ~ y. j,hoiis an.'. +planne,d ' future actions f.or safely r _1 D S

' M tes. W I,)g y?. ' Q --

s -

g

.,e s

,..e S

1), lC 3%@lg% $gl1%:n9Ng&g@(R;q. &

Q.)&&TWy

% % y w y, a,";

g %

.f,*~ _3 t. 6.. y " p.:

a:fje se ' %

w'

,s s

w.%.y%WlO M Q2 Q 5 %y

~

3

,. Y:

' ~

W.

' ' ' j'. ;' r@y-f'.

R f'.:.,

x g

cfY, cj' * ~y.e Y%&. 7f 1 1 &

.i y

v-Qn

' T:

% :.?_'?

Q (D~aH & f t

N-

. i,'

W g[4 ~, i *f:.

qr<

.Q p:3 y

-e..*'-

'.\\

}'

_,. Q q p 5"R[ff@Q.i -

, 3

,7-' p+;' e ;y%-

g., 7 4

+

7i.

[ }.

e

.'.O

~' 3; j e
y y g i s y y'f

,,ga g.-.- s a

+y g y

~

_. r '

v.#.

~

f :MQ.

' 2)' ' t,&E ' D s

s

'3'

'7 orrecs > '

4 awaas >

".5 M

i-z-.

MV me u-m

,s?,:;'.c C J %g,

< N '.

~ y h.. e.n'k-e:t 9 4

-p*

s y,>i zy] g p.

1;*h t-4*n

, /

-g.

,_ p 9;

+

i.

a Foss ABC 318 (Rev. M3) ABCM OMO g g*Q v@ :"M u. s.povsnmasaur eninvin<a orricas so?.sae-see

.a.

+..a'm An hu w?%sk.44.MhMs, w4A%iist MLa.h;.Qaa.,&&,,liuga. %e wg,. g;;g;,r TgAMggghb

,- n.,

y.

- w. ; mwn

\\

+ y ~.7.y w

3.n nym..

1.

i l

y v,..

g

.c

.a.

a v:

sims^;rb,i.

  • O&.,.,

3@

W-S

)

r.

'.y 4.J.';4: 7 },,;,

h,.. v.

.. 3 n m;,.

m n

g s.

. y.,.

t e.

- a ',

g wg

_ Distribution '

i j

+

4 Docket File n MGroff

o j

j

'A NRC PDR

/

EHughes

~ ~.

Local PDR

.LDreher

^"

'ED0 Reading SAVarga T

e NRR Reading CMoon

~

m A -,

LUR #4 File MService JYore, ASLB,.

l me Honorable Rooert P. Griffin BCRusche s

l l

United States Senate m.d

.EGCase

IE-(3) l

' Washington, D. C.

205101~'.U-f R.SBoyd 4

'JMil1er 7

M 6

Attorney, ELD

, RHeineman

^

l L ear Senator Griffin:1 i'%A~. '

CA (3)

^

HDenton' D

LIamp j' f%w GErtter-(01031) VStello 7.. leased to respond.to your referral of Qctober i

15,1976, whicn forwarded the October 12, 1976' letter of yop'r constituent, Mr. Heil D.

Brown.. Mr. Brown has irxlicated his concer regarding Units 1 and 2 i

of-the Midland Plant which are currently

.r construct on.

J l

. Several of Mr. Brown's concerns' were repeated from his first, letter i'f*

? dated Septemoer 6,1976. Therefore, wp now address those r..atters 1

of concern to Mr.. Brown notEresponded/tB in our Octooer 6,1976 letter.

[

~ We are including the previous correspondence as Enclosure 5. ' We believe our; letter.. dated Octooer 6,1,1976, i%,

  • sep6aher 8,,1976; was responsive din resconse to your referral of i

o Mr. Brown's concerns stated irEl

?

~

l his September;6,il976 letter.:

l

,5 r.

- t.

at.

t

~

Construction for Midlind PlanthUnit I fis presently 14 percent. complete

~

and co,struction.2for. Unit:2 is 16 percent complete. Unit 2 will be.

s

-Unit i will supply process s[ tea: rand electricity.be producing only electric

(,

, comp'.x first since itjil

~ '

V I

I m;%..

Y m

n~ag

. e have interpreted Mr.'Br[own'c u hic concern to be.tnat'iE is.andioperatef ajublear power' plan t

n n

3 -a c

,a-W s speci unsafe to bdildJ I

j of: the Nuc] ear Aegulator[Coninission.(NRC)J is' to, protect the health i -

~A..'

Cand 'safet ' of. the public.JT6 carry out this r'esponsib' lity the id E C' i

(staff-perfou s a detailed revietof all applications for construction <

.4 n

a permits and operatinglicenses for rinclear power plants. 'Our Safety? ^ ' T, f.i.

~

1 Evaluation Reportffor'lthf Midland PlantJwas 'provideil as an enc]'osure tot ~_%

~

-.'our October 6,1976 l'ett5r t'o you. JAddl ional information on the sub-Qect'of'sIafety isMressed in Enclosure

~" Insuring Safe Designs-x S of Nuclear Power Pla' bs;">which explains ou ' procedures for perfordingl N!

n idesign. reviews and} inspections to? assure.tha delear. power' plants % " %7"

'~

i ', Iare safe.J As'with eberything: else2 there is ys'.some risk, no mattef-M p red ;to assure that (th. ivities..' '. We NRC 1icengin.'g pr.ocess: ic

.f.how ls m

hu. man,r,act eqdesig. mal 1) s 'n.ia.ll?s i

e;most. advan.. -

. 4 e "m

.can m2 1

Mtechnology are usedTto protect 1the. public and thereby ainimize risk.' AQ C

. m '

g q. g g:.;; g ; g g g 4 p :i g y., m. p p g 4-. j

, y s. %. Q u;,.

s m,

w :.. ~ y a<.,

-1 m

e~

m.

o "Although... y..one :can hypothes se a potentialcfor ' danger. tWthe.public health y :p,

p. ' ^ Ganf toTtheTnEEo,nment"from a# serious reactor accidente nuclear" power % J E L

,g Npla'rit'ajhad6d#anTexce11eatIsafety record.to date. 4 No member of

  1. ,7.; %

~ the"gereral*pubfic has ever;been ;fnjured by radiation frcm an ~ accident' /Y. '

~

.atfa;1icensed;nuclearipower Jreactor. -In' fact, tin well over 200 reactor' y i.

j;

- 1 years of consercialenuclear power plant experience, there has'been.C

' f "' 5 430, :edG EWfA{NiufnL, UL dely AID 2 CaualilJ InG1dLlua e y.>v ut.- tv a..

m

, ~J ica'~pGi)

Qf Nhe'Dul. 1M.. ' '

" ' ' ' ~

~ ' ' +

-.J l: 0 g,6*;f Y ' Yb f, g'h 5 "0 Y l*

Q

~

t.

u:r,: ; 7tz z 4

,y a.

.,... c,...

! p; l,,,.

g:

Q 8,

.g;y pyxa m.<

m. gm p t

+

.?-~

-G

,y., y,

~,

m Ln:-

^=c > m<=,y m'->>> w^'c= a24-.a., & -.:,,wir d M^ "W u

  • w ;; g u a 'J., a., u w' ~g;;, g, a 2.,_;,;. Q g p a;,y L -

' ^

~

~~

.a

- e.,..,

n.

n,

_,'(.',

A i

.y, 7,

u ~.'

7 4

m -

l

~

t

=2he honorable Rocort P. Griffin' - i

~ A' final report of a 3-year stucy to estimate the risks to the public

. from potential acciderts in today's large nuclear power plants nas

. bien completed. De report MSH-1400, " Reactor Safety Stucy,"

7 concludes tnat the' risks associated with operation of present-day nuclear, power plants are very low compared to other natural and. man-made

' " risks. Enclosure 2 is the? news' release sich furtner, discusses tnis :

e

^

~

_ repor't and how it can be obtained.;

+

j j

e.

.,.4; Mr.7 Brown has indicated a ~ concern regarding poor workmansnip anc procedures Deing used in construction of tne Midland plan. Ine nidlano plants l

wereJissued construction permits on Deceruber 5, 1972.

In 1970, tne i

Atomic Energy Ccnnission iss'ueditne qualit< assurance requirements set (forth 'in<Agendix B 'of lo:CFR' Part 50, "-

)ity Assurance Criteria for. Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reproe saing Plants," which is provided

+

i

'in Enclosure 6. Whe requirements set idrtn in tnis Apoencix G of;10 Cta i

Part 50 'were the 'r.esult _of our staff' indepth review of proble.u areas encountered during tne construction t plants prior to 1970 ana were designeo to provide'the necessary' idelines 'and requirements for an i

~

aoequate: qual.ity assurance progrg. The Midland plant's quality assurance

~

program has received an indepth feview cy our staff and has been"

. found to be acceptacle inithat' it. meets the criteria set forta'in l

Appencix a of 10 CFR Part ~50.

The'22 incidents of poo' workmanshi freferred to'by Mr. Brown wer -detectec, reporteo,~ and repaired in'p r

accoraance wita the quality assurance program approved by tne Comission, v11ch is one of. the prboy. objectives of the quality assurance program. -. 4,,

4 u: % g

_*-Q; L f,

f.

~%,e s

xg

  • Hr." Brown ~also expr

, concern;about storage of the high-level waste s

^

m 4 products from a nuclea plant'.7. In accordarce"wita"the Energy,

'".aeorganidation Act of 0ctooer 1974,'tne. Energy Research'and Develop-.

E f

. ' ment Administration 1(ERm) tis responsible for. developing acceptacle

. waste (disposalfsyst ' ~ for' high: level wastes.' ibis agency is con-

~ et V

tinuing to concuct velopment efforts en the.various.available

-r (options;for tne permanent 7 disposal of taece nublear wastes at governsent-I owned"facilitlesT Enclcsure 3, " Disposal, off Radioactive Waste,"

outlined oar present metuis'~and planred future adtions for' safely' E _ [ '

^

t handling;these sestes.^

?

fXMj$vsW.%MM;WhKW Q* V. X& ? * '~ ~ '9 ajw T

h e

' A G l:.?.f Q L ".};4 ) * %'

p.*1id. eRp '% %h

'Y

-.c

~;

A. Q %., Q'h. :.'. f 1-

~. -

  • WQ -sk Q y*jft.,)y?.$W$?lQ. _t u :

s

_ ;[

-y gn

,., - f" ~ fl l., **

y s

D?.n g Gqw ' d ' Mg;f>&W.Vf;y& z ; ' l ~

i;,'=a L.2, " M '

w.

~l.

~,,s'

, I:

l^

' ~

.-%P,h.7, A_ :;f

{ ' i splf(NQW%p'.}

+

.w

.5[ ' /. f -[

M * \\.

R.:f.]

5,* : 9,. ~9 5% n

... s.-

&jf p?.;jMiggh h@.kQ f?, ;.3' '

, ^ " '

'T

~.

,~

~

mI,'g; '-. g K b y g g. g f

?-

+

(j %#f' ' '

i

,lf,. ffy?;Q&f.,y, y& pf&&f;;

p

^ $

W D ? **' '

  • w.;. _m,

.a.

l~ <

z;*'

msu,.

n v.ey^.;J Sq s{

'ggy f

-- N

. Q s.~ [. f 7

?P.., '. '

fgg

+;

l?

T

  • +...s

/$

45 "S-

~

.y e W u c t ' y e; "v.,

] 3 -

Q w; V"*

y

+

i

_ _ :[M ~ f,

t ~ *. !

^

g g '.,

's l

.'.:<d,i...t %.,-N,,,sp%

~s.

n, t,.,

va -

4

<D '

E

.}' M ;( p ~

fs.(

,pe,,;; ' Q,

tq, 3

~

'+.t I

h>g g,q g h r 0 Y t' 2 I.

~

,' N

.3,

..; x

.. ~,.

s

p. 'y

.e.

7,,.

m r.

s, u

(

.SumMAME

~ d

- ~

~'

' \\*

Y

^

.[*

<~;.; f ?

gg 5., n " [.

34%:

4

.e

<,s,

, m.e c

~.q,.

c,

magg y

s

,T.

s w

'

  • Poems ABC 318 (Bee. 9 53) ABChi 0240 4 ' r #vW: O. # u. s. eovs=MMsNr PRINTING OFFICE 8 9 974 326 948
  • O
  • 1' l
. -4.%=.x,.w.A.m&d.iLhAA AA;sch3 Mut.nl #d.W,4.Mm%;
L.AQ,w&J ?ir&%

,,,4

  • cl 4 L.,., YM "

A,i I

~ ~ -

n x +-

e

~.

.~

.,, w z

.. v s

s a

..c.

p a.

-4 m n.?

._.s y

  • J ' 4p 4.

u,w" *.

\\~4

~.i,.

  • q

~

a.

s.,_,~

e.

n,..

4

,..p..

y9 m.

,,3 n

~

s.4

,%,.., s.

m.,

+

.g n

v.

e

]

e 97 4

.y s -

yt,(

y m

s.

~

Ine Honorable Nobert P. Griffin,?

g sr m

n

+

.x This-letter la ceing sent[in cuplicate an'd the original letter is,.. -

1 returned oyIenclosure. We hope this letter and our letter; dated ~

( C(-

7 t

~

l October 6; 1976,' nave been responsive to.Mr. Brown'.s concerns and l

will. assist you in your reply.

~

si % m.F, f

&m

.4

. p~.

._-o.,

r r

o.

-v "m, ; ;.e ~

7..

~

+

  • :. Sincere 1,'

N,. ; ;...

n,.

^

i r

g.~

-w

~

x g

y

.w* r ' **

7 l

, 's NY

- *; s

...s '+o

  • 2.-*

w--

m sy

.2-'.

.t;

4. w a x t j m.

wg y

I A

3.

H.

u

.. a

\\

yn, t

. 's J K,.,[l

. 1

,.r - ~ w f,,,;

i

,.s

..b

+

- Q.

l

,,.s t

.a.

m y

s c

p

  • Y.,

$~

"*Y,**

ee

= h 9@~hs I

en s T M ;.

., g v 't

-~~

l

Enclosures:

~ ~

T. i A. 2 _ 7 '

+

- i..

~ '

i 1.' Insuring. Safe Designs of, uclear T~

. 3,

. f

,b,

I Power 7 Plants 4 " ^

x( ~

..,?.

~

  • Ti'

~ "

L2J. NEC News Release No.- 75/ 57 f,.

s,.

3.': Disposal of Radioa.ctive Waste

'4.D hr. Brown's' letter of" tober;12, 1976

~,, r -

l SN mC Letter of October 6,1976 -

~

Lt :m.

m u.

l O L6p Appendix B;of110, [Part[50 Q

f'.

f'
  • j.m p

l 3

j y

, te,.y

y. m.. a re

+. U** 1.,.,4.s : e.. r s

...., v. s..

c 1

o.e $

- 4 j

o i.p.,-; e.! ?. +, y ; <r- % g 4

,A

.s i,,.r+

I g

4 "m,

5 N,.h._,$, w,$.N

~ [

S "W. ; 'h,'~ *

,',,'e( )

h ",. :.,

SV '..,..

s

...v, a m,wg. +.

~

.,w

w.,,.

.. y.,3

.x c,...,

4. e.

, ;} c -

% g..,. '..c m

J

+

',s_..

q,.

,f

.. m.e

.g_

x..,

. ' v-g.

g

.*q v. n _ s....

i r_,'

h'

.+-,, " i.,w Q..,

)

,,3

-w

. rr..

nf>.v 3

..,,,' * ~

+.;s p;'.

O. -. ( Y W ',

~*, [ -

.,.,a.

l

+

4',,.-.

_i y

.'1i.

4. -

9' l

.a 1'"-

v.

A

+3 9, 4

..,w,.

e 5*

= =,.

(

.n, t,!

g

, ; + p,.y x,

~

.a: n

~

m

- c,

k-Sn n.

, i; g..

...m :w;g,;f zy L f 7 %,y;:','W L Rk. jy;.,,, -

.s ym

_p

..g...

g. ;.

s

~. ;..: 4 m -

v ;. #,.y > *.:.,_, q~,...

i

-.. ~..

v

-.i, x,

~

s n:,

,3

-n.

'w

  • 2 N,1,~?-f 7 6.,

i

,s n.

43 af.,

C-3aN 6, w 1

.4

.p

q.... : a.w;%w,n.
  • x... p a.m a s y,e ei' r QpY,:s.s.. ~

--c; %, **A

,t-

3.,' 4

,j n-r,.

rm I

- nn a,,

+.

~

+

.s,y,*.

s. An. i O.- A.

, +

,.,;: M.. @ "~

  • V 2/
l,
  • r j

-f g..

a :

y e 8-% n

.x, ys

+n

...,. any y 4

p

' 1 r

.I

.' -, Q.

3

. '. gy O 1 %. jy,;; &, < a 9.

..#,t, e

e m

l^*

l.

QQ.

' T"; ;.y, &,3.w y...

r.

e

.M

  • y s

W.,* %',s $3 qnN % %m*.n'm%:;u ;g s

.?r.u. f. p y

g

m g %.st*,
u w.jp',%
a

..w'QQ.,y@3SQ _,;e y ;.*.4 jf.}w{e n up,y%m; }

W

'l-p q_gn y% [ Q m:

.g,

..-. ; ; a,'

(

-i; f:m w m : x S Q.. w.Y 1..g g

env

" O.$#PMDWW-]MWNMbM;c.% Q:( Q g g - f p. Qn,;n.~

t e

' x a FW ' L

-J p,s a-ygy R

g 9,n ua.n.

fnq, l

.ww vm m a

. ~~

-3.+ m, a..,m.,.e&m E@Q. %u%% > %k;'Md2%.M*,;%C ^ ^ " 'y \\

RgAL

e.c,& %" p%t y M.

A Mh %Y.

='%

: RD h e.

K h. A Q M n M + T -

l

  • p g.,s. 9.p c.p.,.e.,f f;.s.,.~ g g..c.. A y,.y w :c..%. : m s,,.T.g

,.wqw 7:

s.

j w

- -we

\\

A

., L,y n

42.. ; -a w w.

. ca

  • ... 4, '.., a' /

a....,

m

+

- m. g. :. ;,..-a ~..

8.

,,?

, ;o. Q

-w q

n<

m

, c. -.~

~

9 1

u..

a o

u y

m t

all/i /76 '

- TSEE PRFVIOUS JELIDW FOR ADDITIONAL CONCURRENCES s

.,,,c. i P k NYjrh, Ab/LWRF ' -

DPN NRR/D1 9 EDO)

-'.D_P.,M/D m

p0 it,

hga.

2 B

"LVG.ossick' DBV s lo-

...R. S.-.. '..' ' "

~T.Rusche.IQ / @u

11/ R./74 j agg 'T6'~

E

, ~.u M. M. *

- gwg.

-, <.,.m.:.;6 Ill/{Q -

111///;?/763 ell

-~/76-11... #

~

/6 ~

6

< - ai k.- ;

. ocu p -

^

n i -

' ~f

^Wu 4 - e w *

-*-#~

l Ferma AECdit (Rev.94D ABCM 0240 J. %

A;wel, hMm. s. oovanNusNT PitlNTING OFFICE 8 9974 528 984f 3, w, %,wa w.. n, v. g..mi CA,.h@TTgih' + y,Q+

( #s

.-.., a w *r A g.r w % v h.' W M.

,w

e.

.rL

]\\.;,

b ci, C.

.e.

- i t

. Ine Honorable Robert P. Griffin '

A final report of a 3-year study to estlaste the risks to the puolic i

from potential accidents in today's large nuclear power plants has Geen comp 1eted. The report h%SH-1400, " Reactor Safety Study,"

4 j

concludes that the risks associated with operation of present-day nuclear power plants are very low compared to other natural and man-mie risks., Encloeure 2 is the news release which 'further discusses, this l-report and how it can be: ootained.

I u

Mr. Brown also expressed concern aoout stpraae of the high-level waste products from a nuclear plant. In accordance with the Energy Reorganization Act of Octooer 1974, the,Cnergy Research and Develop-sent Adninistration (ElOA) is responsible for developing acceptable

-waste. disposal systems for high-level hastes. 'Ihis agency is con-tinuing to conduct development efforts on the vas ious available options for the' permanent disposal of these nuclear wastes at government-owned facilitles. Enclosure 3, "Discosal of Radioactive Waste,"

out)ines our.present metnods and planned future actions for safely 1

~

\\

handling tnese waste-N.

This letter,is being -sent in duplic\\ ate and the original letter is N

~.

i returned by' enclosure. We hope tnis letter and our letter dated October.'6,1976, have been responsive to Mr. Brown's concerns and will assist you in your 'replf.y j

1 7

j1_

q j

y

- Sincerely, l

. ~

s

- u.'

U.A l

7 l

,,-, W y.

(

m a

j

..g

.f m

m L

g 2 ;- T Y'

, h Ms w

i iEnclosurest_ ~

St 6:3

, ~,,

f J'

s

}

1.

Insuring 1 Safe Designs of Nuclear.,

{.75-259 ] "m

. Power Plantsy *,

2. iNRC News Delease No.:

m [,

[

3. f Disposalfof Radioactive Waste ' [ i l 7-

^

~4.- )Mr.. Brown's letter of October 12,"1976 ~

/

~

- - ' 5.. ' NRC. Letter of 'Octooer 6,1976-

"n i'"

~

1. yn. _' * *.

1-i 4% o t

%mf.. ~

'Ii-

-~

~

'V-p 3],DPM/ LWR #4_.,j y;

~. OELD s

~

CA SAVarga hmA 1

[

.Os 11/ pr'../76 Tl/ t q /76

~.

11/

/76 DPN.LWRJ3_,.

DPM/AD/LWRs jDPM/D NRR/D/.D

_ NRR/D_

EDO. _ _

o,,,e.

,,.,,,,,, hgp;s.g.pa DBVassallo.

.pSEoyd.

~

"EGCase BRusche VGossick p..

"%u.- T.;.l}[ 1 t/76 llL,_ ]_76 11/1

/76 11/

/76 11/,,_/76 11/.1

/76 I-Form ABC 318 (Rev. 9-53) AECM 9240 n%

W v. e; aovsanusur enenvine orrscre sera-sas.s se

-f

(;

t: ;,t

,(

> ; y a w. ~ Jh n :di.

?w.h.l.n l-lW x l % y X Q u..

-l-

,y

, Z ' '.g

.c. y Q

.,.2.L,

i j

FRGV:

ACTION CONTROL DATE_S CONTROL NO.

i

. w et v. cetert.

COM,LoEAOLl~E unua 01031 ACKNOW LE DG ME NT LI 17[lb DATE OF DOCUMENT f

INTERIM REPLY 1h[I h

i TO:

PREPARE FOR SIGNATUHE

N~r SM FINAL REPLY CHAIRMAN FILE LOCATisN' /// 2

(/

U4kILCd O EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OTHER:

DESCRIPTION O LETTER OMEv0 0 REPORT O OTHER SPECI AL INSTRUCTIONS OR R EMARKS Emet ler 1.s Reit D. kreve temcerstag safety of nuciaer power plants, especially hidl**d Astura emelesure w/ reply i

17D:f.?

I, CLASSIFIED DATA DOCUMENT / COPY NO.

C LASSIFIC ATIONl NUMBER OF PAGES CATEGORY POSTAL REGIST RY NO.

O NSI O Ro O rRo ASSIGNED TO:

DATE INFORMATION ROUTING LEG AL REVIEW O FINAL O COPY Rgactee N/70/76 Case ASSIGNED TO:

DATE NO LEGAL OBJECTIONS Docket T11es)5MM 0E O DMW & COR PES SP M

N"N I

EXTe i

COMMENTS, NOTIF Y:

EXT.

'. NRC FORM ; '

JCAE NOTIFICATION RECOMMENDED:

0 YES O NO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS I

DO NOT REMOVE TH/S COPY PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL ea 6