ML19330A112

Statement of Legal & Factual Contentions Alleging Failure of Eccs.List of Witnesses & Supporting Documentation Encl

ML19330A112
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	06/04/1971
From:	Ginster W GINSTER, W.J., MAPLETON INTERVENORS
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8007150880
Download: ML19330A112 (7)

Text

,

g - a wua Q m , w, a L,- 3 %3,.25

, coa t tt) j -7

" C  !

. . JUN 10197] 5* 2 BEFORE TiiE Y

lik d ** I'*'WI /

tsa "

• UNITED STATES OF AhfERICA 4,

N[ ,

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) l

) l

,, CONSUhfERS POWER COMPANY ) '

Docket Nos. 50-329

[ (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2) ) 50-330 y J f./ M

. STATEKfENT OF LEGAL AND/OR FACTUAL CONTENTIONS I

TO TIIE HONORABLE SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD: i Now como NELSON AESCHLIMAN et al, Intervenors of Mapleton, i Michigan, by their attorney, WILLIAM J. GINSTER, and respectfully re-

, serving the right to move to make any further legal and/or factaal conten-tions deemed necessary, make the following more specific legal and/or g factual contentions (than those heretofore set forth in the PETITION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE) in support of their interventions:

I*

That to permit construction and/or operation of the proposed nucIcar reactors at the proposed site in such close proximity to the AESCHLIMAN I

et al Intervenors of Mapleton, Michigan and under all other circumstat ces j and conditions prevtiling would constitute a clear violation of 10CFR Part y

, 100.

I I II.

( That 10CFR Part 50, Appendix D, as applied to the AESCHLIMAN l

l et al Intervenors is .rbitrary and unreasonable, and constitutes a violation l

of vested legal rights under the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and of the United States of America.

I l

m.

I i i i

1 ji That 10CFR Part 20, aa presently applicable and/or applied, is y

l{ arbitrary and unreasonable, and constitutes a violation of vested legal ti

l rights under the Con.citutions of the State of Michigan and of the Urlted I

i States of America.

9007150 N O

. . .- ... - _. . _ _ . w/

• ll

,l t

I r IH - A j That permitting applicant to dump any radioactive waste into the proposed I

f cooling pond or emitting such radioactive waste into the atmosphere under all i

the circumstances and conditions prevailing would constitute a violation of 10CFR Part 20, a claimed radiological hazard and danger to the health of

{ AESCHLIMAN et al Intervenors and/or their invitees and/or children.

III - B That permitting applicant to dump any radioactive waste into the proposed cooling pond or emitting such radioactive waste into the atmosphere under all

' the circumstances and conditions prevailing without the consent of the AESCHLIMAN et alIntervenors constitutes a claimed violatios of vested legal rights under the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and the United States of America.

I III - C That permitting applicant to dump waste on land not owned by the Federal l'

l or State Governments constitutes a violation of 10CFR Part 20 l

IV l

That the failure of the emergency core cooling system for nuclear power plants which have been recently tested in cmall scale simulated models in l Idaho by the Idaho Nuclear Corporation constitutes a grave hasard and danger 1

.. ,l to the health and safety of AESCHLIMAN et al and/or their property rights, i

and proceeding in this licensing matter at this time and not holding it in abey-f:

an-e until emergencyane cooling systems have been properly designed, thor-ij l p oughly researched and developed, and completely tested in full scale models

.I y at the Idaho test location and not under simulation, is respectfully contended if to be an abuse of discretion and a violation of vested legal rights under the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and of the United States of America.

1 V.

That the operation of the proposed units is likely to impair or destroy i the air or constitute a 1.azard or danger to the health and safety of the 4

N. --

, l

k

'l

. AESCHLIMAN et alIntervenors and/or their vested property rights in the i

following particulars:

l l

VI - A l Likelihood of escape of radioactive gasses, especially with passage of t

time, i

VI - B N

i: Likelihood of radioactive additions to atmospheric fog created and/or

' aggravated by operation of the proposed cooling pond and cooling tower; it being contended that under the peculiar meteorological conditions at or about

(' the proposed site that water vapor will have a tendency to trap and retain

f Il such radioactivity and for want of dispersion with inversion, will concentrate

! such radioactive gasses, -

VI - C I

l Likelihood of dangerous or hazardous vehicular driving conditions by l

• \ reason of fogging and interference with visibility, and also creation of slip-I' pery and treacherous driving conditions from icing in winter time caused O and/or contributed to by the cooling tower.

l ld t

VI - D

.I

( Likelihood of creation of noxious or deleterious odors from chemical ft additives in operation of the proposed cooling pond and or tower with possible

' radioactive gasses or vapors emanating therefrom.

N ll VI - E Il' Likelihood of property damage from the fra agoing.

l;i VI - F

]

t N Likelihood of injurious or detrimental effects on' health, physical and/or 1

0 mental.

[l VI - G l  ! Likelihood of substantial or materialinterference with use and enjoy-g ment el t toperty.

[

VI - H l'

.i Likelihood of destruction or impairment of business.

U l

n

.N

?

0 i

VI - I a

4 l Likelihood of sufferance of annoyance, inconvenience, or discomfort, f!

VI - J

i

( Likelihood of radioactive and chemical contamination from the proposed hl pond of underground water, including drinking water.

0 ll VI - K d

Possibility of maximum credible accident.

l'!

l VI - L i

i l Depreciation of property values.

ll VI - M h

ilt Likelihood of noise and/or noise pollution from operation of proposed cooling tower.

! VU l That the location of the site and/or operation of the proposed nuclear po'ver plant leaves AESCHLIMAN et al with no insurance coverage in the event of a nuclear accident by res son of the nuclear exclusion clause, and said Inter-venors have suffered deprivation of their property rights by reason thereof II

within the scope and meaning of the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and the United States of America.

4 VIII

!! AESCHLIMAN et al assert rights protectable by the Michigan' ENVIRON-1 MENTAL PROTECTION ACT of 1970, effective October 1,1970; a copy of l which is attached hereto.

Respectfully Submitted,

~~ .

vi h WI yL~i J/QINSTER~

ttorney fvr intervenors AESCHLIMAN et al l of Michigan Dated: June 4, A.D.1971. \,

I eI i

g l

'OCXET NUMBER

'os PROD. L UILL, l&C. UW9,990 ggtal.3 V .,. f S Un&EC

~

h.c .

2 JUN101971 * 'O i

• I '

em,,,d me swwr t mramac: // i e=' ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF

'~u l CA0 p

'0 e STATEMENT OF LEOAL AND/OR FACTUAL CONTENTIONS t

?

~

l

s. ,.

e.

- P.A.126 ' im REGUI.AR SESSION

• l g.,.... ,, .. ~ , . . . . . . - . .

s 7 ,y COIN OPERATED DEVICES-ENTRY WITH NTENT (' -  ;

M , .TO STEAL-FELONY t .

..,..te.

1

f..n...~<.s...

.,.c  : * . . ' . v-s' t

<f . .p; ,i.:,.ie

., . . , PUBI,IC, ACT NO.126 9 a s .*

' r.:2* . . Qs.*i.bie 'h  ;. .. ,

t + .. V* p i ,

,.it p' . , J,.i.4 r . .% SENATE'BH1 No: 583 ' '- - ,' , ' , ,

,l '.

V:,T** t' , ,, . .' , ,

8 AN ACF relating to cola operated devices, includlag but act limited to.

1. ' parking meters, cola telegshonce and reading machtmes t and provid!ng for s' I

' j 'l, .* *,. j - .5",.

• m '.'*- ,

l g : er. ., i . s .Fae people of the 3:efe of 2ffcAlpen enect: '

1

. KC.LA. 9 F52.3141 ' ' , . ' , '.J'4'..,' a f See. 3. A pereoa shaII be guilty of a felon

• puninhalde apon convierlon t.r ennflue, f t

. ment la the state prison for a period not te exceed 3 years nr by a fine of not snore than $1.000.00or both it be does either of ta 3 goggoggag {

- (a) Enters er forces na estrance. alters er laserts any part of an lastrunrut late l

• any parking meter. Tending machine dirgensing goods or services, taoneT ebanger er

, any other device designed to meetre currency or coins with the intent to steal ,

'(b) Emowingly possesses a key ar' device, or a drawing, print or mold thereof. A adapted and desismed to open or break into any such machtae with intent to steal '

money se other contents from IL, ,, l M.C.L.A. 8 732.812 4 . '

ree e * '

', . See. 2. This, act shall take effect January 3.1971. ' ,'. [', l

' ordered to take immediat.e effect.. , , .

's,. . .g .

', A lpr md seiy :4. ma. , e e.,,

..g-

.. . i

-e , . , . /,9: ,

n e

d ... ,v . :.y t l

',-.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECI' ION ACT OF 1970 "

l * *

.1

' , . ., PUBIJC ACT NO.127 ft .

., ,.,.4 f*. ' *

h .

• (, LL No. 3055 ['

'.W ' " AN ACF to provide *w actions for declaratory and raultablo reib 1 for pro. i tection of the air water and otteer riatural resources and the pubtle trust f' 0 '; ' theretat to presertbe the rights, duties and functions of the attorney general, I any political subdivisloa of *%e state, any Instrumentality or agency of the ,

,t. state or of a political subdh..lon thereof, any person, partnership, corpora. *

. *. . tion. association, organisation or other legal entityI and to provide for judi.

,  !/., east promedings plative thenta ,

y .

s .

ras people of sAe stese of attenteen eneet:* ' -

EcL.A. l ss e;1201 ' / .' ,

l '

Sea s. This act, abatt be known and may be efted as the "Ihomas J. Anderson; - .

( cerdon atockwou environmental protectica act,ef 1970*.g' s. ,.,

..NELa."efdI*iETssL:ser.I eM.t .7, * . [ ' . *[ ,16 '

' . .' . d,Y J '-

,. ig,9 %L.O.

• c ' ~ f...v. ..,

. . seestantive anasses la..

Q h }.ti 262 test 3 taalcaled by seeernae C:

L

--.?. N.kttMG JML, S_. .$, .' lM. i ' .si 'Y ,sb' m y a.t.cl.ns .

..c . .~

r 1

... ~

2ss

. .JQ. l.. ,

, mas J. GINsTEft O 8 .* ' Me' =#>. *. 84 d * ,. . . . .t*. .,

j RNav at Law

g. .t. ,1 s...t..u.e .. . se t..

i.siented ., e...,n.e a.. .cN ea .

.p < . - '

264 t

. ..* ' "ks . ; 1- . ,

' (1 e . . G hM!. r *.,h+. ..

. .a%.

. , , ca. J. 4. . .*

2.

W : y .;

i_

l l

i s *

/ 00CKff NUMUER gggg3 PM & Uill, fAC. M-M,@

[ w .c JUn 10'1971

• 4

~

i BEFORE THE '

V pa w ra vna8 i

, rmwW 77

'g "fb UNITED STATES OF AMERICA s h ATOM *C ENERGY COMMESION In the Matter of )

) .

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY) Docket Nos. 50-329 h (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2) ) 50- 330 g )

1 I

LIST OF WITNESSES FOR INTERVENORS AESCHLIMAN et al of Mapleton. Michigan  !

Expert witnesses who may be called to testify in support of j i

the contentions of the above-entitled Intervenors at the hearing in opposition to the granting of the application of CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY with a l resume' of qualifications of each, are as follows:

DR. CHAS. W. HUVER i

He has a B.S. Degree with high honors from Michigan State University, a Masters Degree in Zoology from the University of Wisconsin ,

at Madison; a PHD in Zoology from Yale University and has worked in research capacity for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; he has worked at l t

various Marine Laboratories such as the Marine Biological Laboratory at  !

I Whitshall, Massachuesetts; the Learner Marine Laboratory at Benomee:

the University of Connecticut Marine Laboratory; he has taught at the l University of Rhode Island as an Instructor in the Zoology Department, and i

• raa there went to the University of D11nois Medical School and joined the I

l Awtomy Department as an Assistant Professor: then he came to the  ;

I University of Minnesota as an Associate Professor of Zoology and is also

[

Curator of fishes at the. Bell Museum of Natural History of the University of !

i Minnesota. He has participated in other AEC SAFETY AND LICENSING l BOARD PROCEEDINGS. i t

au J. Gamstan nNEY AT LAW 4 esteen eLDR {

.. c .. ,

a i k l l

l i

N

• 6 vv

-,,g _,., , , - .

l l

4 l

4

, STEVE J. GADLER ,

I i

f Steve J. Gadler of St. Paul, Minnesota is a registered professional i i

engineer in the State of Minnesota. He is a member of the National Society l j of Professional Engineers and the Minnesota Society of Professional

- {

6 1 Engineers. He is a senior member of the Society of Electrical and i Electronic Engineers. He is a member of the Minnesota Pollution Control Ag ency. He has participated in other AEC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD proceedings.

I 1 .

/

~

d E (.C M J. GINSTER Attor for Inte rvenors _,

AESC et al of Ma eton, Michigan 4

\

Busi ess Address:

Sui 4 Merrill Building ginaw, Michigan 48602 l

I f

9

• 4 1

1 i

l l i

e t

2-aM .L Ginstan anse af Law e essemeLL stae.

g law. MICE *tGaN y

, '99 94S9 7 4

C

_-- .. .. L_