ML19330A112
| ML19330A112 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/04/1971 |
| From: | Ginster W GINSTER, W.J., MAPLETON INTERVENORS |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8007150880 | |
| Download: ML19330A112 (7) | |
Text
,
- a wua g
, w, a L,- 3 %3,.25 Q
m coa t tt) j -7 C
. JUN 10197] 5* 2 BEFORE TiiE Y
lik d ** I'*'WI
/
tsa "
- UNITED STATES OF AhfERICA N[
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 4,
In the Matter of
)
l
)
l
,, CONSUhfERS POWER COMPANY )
Docket Nos. 50-329
[ (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
)
50-330 J
f./ M y
STATEKfENT OF LEGAL AND/OR FACTUAL CONTENTIONS I
TO TIIE HONORABLE SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD:
i Now como NELSON AESCHLIMAN et al, Intervenors of Mapleton, i
Michigan, by their attorney, WILLIAM J. GINSTER, and respectfully re-serving the right to move to make any further legal and/or factaal conten-tions deemed necessary, make the following more specific legal and/or factual contentions (than those heretofore set forth in the PETITION FOR g
LEAVE TO INTERVENE) in support of their interventions:
I*
That to permit construction and/or operation of the proposed nucIcar reactors at the proposed site in such close proximity to the AESCHLIMAN I
et al Intervenors of Mapleton, Michigan and under all other circumstat ces j and conditions prevtiling would constitute a clear violation of 10CFR Part y
, 100.
I I
II.
(
That 10CFR Part 50, Appendix D, as applied to the AESCHLIMAN l
et al Intervenors is.rbitrary and unreasonable, and constitutes a violation l
l of vested legal rights under the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and of the United States of America.
I m.
l I
i i
i ji That 10CFR Part 20, aa presently applicable and/or applied, is 1
y l{ arbitrary and unreasonable, and constitutes a violation of vested legal ti:l rights under the Con.citutions of the State of Michigan and of the Urlted i
I States of America.
9007150 N O
. w/
- ll
,l' t
I r
IH - A j
That permitting applicant to dump any radioactive waste into the proposed I
f cooling pond or emitting such radioactive waste into the atmosphere under all i
the circumstances and conditions prevailing would constitute a violation of 10CFR Part 20, a claimed radiological hazard and danger to the health of
{ AESCHLIMAN et al Intervenors and/or their invitees and/or children.
III - B That permitting applicant to dump any radioactive waste into the proposed cooling pond or emitting such radioactive waste into the atmosphere under all
' the circumstances and conditions prevailing without the consent of the AESCHLIMAN et alIntervenors constitutes a claimed violatios of vested legal rights under the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and the United
, States of America.
I III - C That permitting applicant to dump waste on land not owned by the Federal l'
l or State Governments constitutes a violation of 10CFR Part 20 l
IV l
That the failure of the emergency core cooling system for nuclear power plants which have been recently tested in cmall scale simulated models in l Idaho by the Idaho Nuclear Corporation constitutes a grave hasard and danger 1
,l to the health and safety of AESCHLIMAN et al and/or their property rights, i
and proceeding in this licensing matter at this time and not holding it in abey-f:
an-e until emergencyane cooling systems have been properly designed, thor-ij l
p oughly researched and developed, and completely tested in full scale models
.I y at the Idaho test location and not under simulation, is respectfully contended if to be an abuse of discretion and a violation of vested legal rights under the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and of the United States of America.
1 V.
That the operation of the proposed units is likely to impair or destroy i the air or constitute a 1.azard or danger to the health and safety of the 4
N.
l
k
'l AESCHLIMAN et alIntervenors and/or their vested property rights in the following particulars:
i l
l VI - A l
Likelihood of escape of radioactive gasses, especially with passage of t
- time, i
VI - B N
i:
Likelihood of radioactive additions to atmospheric fog created and/or
' aggravated by operation of the proposed cooling pond and cooling tower; it being contended that under the peculiar meteorological conditions at or about
(' the proposed site that water vapor will have a tendency to trap and retain
- f Il such radioactivity and for want of dispersion with inversion, will concentrate such radioactive gasses, -
VI - C I
l Likelihood of dangerous or hazardous vehicular driving conditions by l
- \\ reason of fogging and interference with visibility, and also creation of slip-I' pery and treacherous driving conditions from icing in winter time caused O and/or contributed to by the cooling tower.
lld VI - D t
.I
(
Likelihood of creation of noxious or deleterious odors from chemical ft additives in operation of the proposed cooling pond and or tower with possible
' radioactive gasses or vapors emanating therefrom.
N ll VI - E Il Likelihood of property damage from the fra agoing.
l;i
]
VI - F t
N Likelihood of injurious or detrimental effects on' health, physical and/or 1
0 mental.
[l VI - G l
Likelihood of substantial or materialinterference with use and enjoy-g ment el t toperty.
[
VI - H l'
Likelihood of destruction or impairment of business.
.i U l
n
. N
?
0 i
VI - I a
4 l
f!
Likelihood of sufferance of annoyance, inconvenience, or discomfort, VI - J
- i
(
Likelihood of radioactive and chemical contamination from the proposed hl pond of underground water, including drinking water.
0 ll VI - K d
l'!
Possibility of maximum credible accident.
l VI - L i
i l
Depreciation of property values.
ll h
VI - M ilt Likelihood of noise and/or noise pollution from operation of proposed cooling tower.
VU l
That the location of the site and/or operation of the proposed nuclear po'ver plant leaves AESCHLIMAN et al with no insurance coverage in the event of a nuclear accident by res son of the nuclear exclusion clause, and said Inter-venors have suffered deprivation of their property rights by reason thereof II; within the scope and meaning of the Constitutions of the State of Michigan and the United States of America.
VIII 4
AESCHLIMAN et al assert rights protectable by the Michigan' ENVIRON-1 MENTAL PROTECTION ACT of 1970, effective October 1,1970; a copy of l
which is attached hereto.
Respectfully Submitted,
~~
vi h WI yL~i J/QINSTER~
ttorney fvr intervenors AESCHLIMAN et al l
of Michigan Dated: June 4, A.D.1971.
\\,
I eI i
- g
'OCXET NUMBER PROD. L UILL, l&C. UW9,990
'os ggtal.3 V.,.
f S
Un&EC h.c
~
2 JUN101971
- O i
I em,,,d me swwr
//
i t mramac:
e='
ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF l
'~u CA0 p
'0 STATEMENT OF LEOAL AND/OR FACTUAL CONTENTIONS e
t
?
l
~
s.
- P.A.126 e.
' im REGUI.AR SESSION l
g.,....
,,.. ~,.
7,y COIN OPERATED DEVICES-ENTRY WITH NTENT
(' -
s
f..n...~<.s...
,.TO STEAL-FELONY M
t s'
..,..te.
1
. p,i.:,.ie., PUBI,IC, ACT NO.126 9
.,.c :
t v-
<f a
s
' r.: *.. Qs.*i.bie 'h 2
i V* p t
+..
,.it p'., J,.i.4 r..% SENATE'BH1 No: 583 ' '- -,', ',,
,l '.
V:,T**
t',,,..',
8 AN ACF relating to cola operated devices, includlag but act limited to.
- ' parking meters, cola telegshonce and reading machtmes t and provid!ng for s' I
' j.* *,. j -
- m l
'l,
.5",.
g : er..,
i. s.Fae people of the 3:efe of 2ffcAlpen enect:
1
. KC.LA. 9 F52.3141 ' ',. ', '.J'4'..,'
f a
f See. 3. A pereoa shaII be guilty of a felon
- puninhalde apon convierlon t.r ennflue, t
. ment la the state prison for a period not te exceed 3 years nr by a fine of not snore than $1.000.00or both it be does either of ta 3 goggoggag
{
- (a) Enters er forces na estrance. alters er laserts any part of an lastrunrut late l
- any parking meter. Tending machine dirgensing goods or services, taoneT ebanger er
, any other device designed to meetre currency or coins with the intent to steal
'(b) Emowingly possesses a key ar' device, or a drawing, print or mold thereof.
A adapted and desismed to open or break into any such machtae with intent to steal money se other contents from IL, l
M.C.L.A. 8 732.812 4 ree e
',. See. 2. This, act shall take effect January 3.1971.
[',
l
' ordered to take immediat.e effect..
.g
's,.
', A lpr md seiy :4. ma.
e
..g-i e.,,
-e
.,. /,9:
l d...
,v. :.y n
e t
', ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECI' ION ACT OF 1970
',.., PUBIJC ACT NO.127 ft l
.1
,.,.4 f*.
- (,
- h.
LL No. 3055
['
'.W ' " AN ACF to provide *w actions for declaratory and raultablo reib 1 for pro.
i tection of the air water and otteer riatural resources and the pubtle trust f' 0 '; ' theretat to presertbe the rights, duties and functions of the attorney general, I
any political subdivisloa of *%e state, any Instrumentality or agency of the
,t.
state or of a political subdh..lon thereof, any person, partnership, corpora.
. *.. tion. association, organisation or other legal entityI and to provide for judi.
!/., east promedings plative thenta y.
s ras people of sAe stese of attenteen eneet:* '
l EcL.A. l ss e;1201 ' /.'
Sea s. This act, abatt be known and may be efted as the "Ihomas J. Anderson; -
( cerdon atockwou environmental protectica act,ef 1970*.g' s.
..NELa."efdI*iETssL:ser.I
eM.t
.7, *
[ '. *[
,16
. d,Y
,. ig,9 %L.O. f..
J '-
- c ' ~.v..., seestantive anasses la test taalcaled by seeerna Q h }.ti 262
.. 3
--.?. N.kttMG JML, S_..$,.' lM. i '.si 'Y,sb' C: L m
y a.t.cl.ns
...c
..~
r 1
~
2ss
..JQ.
l..
84 d *,....
mas J. GINsTEft O
8.* ' Me'
=#>.
.t*.
j RNav at Law g.
. t.
,1
.p <.
s...t..u.e
... se t..
i.siented., e...,n.e a..
.cN ea t
...* ' "ks. ; 1-264
' (1 e.. G hM!. r *.,h+...,, c.
2.
W : y.;
.a%. a J. 4...*
i_
l l
i s
/
00CKff NUMUER PM & Uill, fAC. M-M,@
gggg3
[
w
.c JUn 10'1971
- 4 i
~
BEFORE THE V
pa w ra vna8 77 i
rmwW
'g "fb UNITED STATES OF AMERICA h
ATOM *C ENERGY COMMESION s
In the Matter of
)
)
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY)
Docket Nos. 50-329 h
(Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2) )
50- 330 g
)
1 I
LIST OF WITNESSES FOR INTERVENORS AESCHLIMAN et al of Mapleton. Michigan Expert witnesses who may be called to testify in support of j
i the contentions of the above-entitled Intervenors at the hearing in opposition to the granting of the application of CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY with a l
resume' of qualifications of each, are as follows:
DR. CHAS. W. HUVER i
He has a B.S. Degree with high honors from Michigan State University, a Masters Degree in Zoology from the University of Wisconsin at Madison; a PHD in Zoology from Yale University and has worked in research capacity for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; he has worked at l
t various Marine Laboratories such as the Marine Biological Laboratory at I
Whitshall, Massachuesetts; the Learner Marine Laboratory at Benomee:
the University of Connecticut Marine Laboratory; he has taught at the l
University of Rhode Island as an Instructor in the Zoology Department, and i
- raa there went to the University of D11nois Medical School and joined the I
l Awtomy Department as an Assistant Professor: then he came to the I
University of Minnesota as an Associate Professor of Zoology and is also
[
Curator of fishes at the. Bell Museum of Natural History of the University of !
i Minnesota. He has participated in other AEC SAFETY AND LICENSING l
BOARD PROCEEDINGS.
i t
au J. Gamstan nNEY AT LAW
{
4 esteen eLDR c..
a i
k l
l l
N v
v i
6
-,,g
l l
4 4
STEVE J. GADLER I
i f
i Steve J. Gadler of St. Paul, Minnesota is a registered professional i
l engineer in the State of Minnesota. He is a member of the National Society j of Professional Engineers and the Minnesota Society of Professional
{
6 1 Engineers. He is a senior member of the Society of Electrical and i
Electronic Engineers. He is a member of the Minnesota Pollution Control Ag ency. He has participated in other AEC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD proceedings.
I 1
/
d E
(.C
~
M J. GINSTER Attor for Inte rvenors AESC et al of Ma eton, Michigan 4
\\
Busi ess Address:
Sui 4 Merrill Building ginaw, Michigan 48602 l
I f
9 4
1 1
i l
l i
e t
2-aM.L Ginstan anse af Law e essemeLL stae.
g law. MICE *tGaN y
'99 94S9 7
4 C
.. L_
--