ML19330A037

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Applicant Reply to Saginaw Intervenors 720206 Environ Contentions.Provides Addl Info to Previous Environ Filings.Interrogatories Will Be Filed on Saginaw Intervenors to Determine Basis for Their Unsubstantiated Conclusions
ML19330A037
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 02/18/1972
From: Restick J
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: Goodman C, Hall D, Murphy A
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8007140830
Download: ML19330A037 (2)


Text

.,

~

p O

~

CDilSUm8f3

=A,,,,,,,

?0"/Sr

..r.l. P.....e.

wee President and GeneralCounsel T}'p*'

J. 5. 8alahoe General Attorney Robert J. Byers General offices: 212 West Michigan Avenue..lackson. Michigan 49201. Area Code 517788-0550 H. E. Clark C. E. Merritt O. M. Petersen Stuart H. Redner William E. Wisner peDruary 18, 19f[2 Semor Anorneys Judd L. Bacon Allen B. Bass Charles D. Dawson R. F. Godbout se..ndyE.Hagen DOCKET NOS. 50-329 AND 50-330 Paula O. Heelck Wayne A. Kirkby Albert D. McCallum W. R. Mills John M. Restrick Da.id R. Rood John M. Smith A. T. udry.

Arthur U. Murphy, Esq., Chairman Dr. Clark Goodman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Professor of Physics Columbia University School of Law University of Houston Box 36, 435 West ll6th Street 3801 Cullen Boulevard New York, New York 10027 Houston, Texas 77004 Dr. David B. Hall Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory P. O. Box 1663 Los Alamos, New Mayico 87544 Gentlemen:

Attached hereto is a copy of Applicant's Reply to Saginav Intervenors February 6, 1972 Environmental Contentions. In replying l

to these contentions Applicant has attempted to provide additional l

infomation in those few areas that were not in fact covered in the l

prior environmental filings and to reference previous filings that answer the many contentions that ignored such filings. Applicant has found these contentions in many cases to relate to matters which are not properly issues in this proceeding, in a number of cases to l

be frivolous, almost uniformly to fail to set forth any facts in sup-l port of broad conclusionary statements, in many cases to be clearly contrary to and to ignore facts already on the record, generally lacking in the specificity required by AEC regulations and in a number of instances to misrepresent Applicant's statements in pre-vious filings. Applicant is particularly shocked by Saginav Inter-venors' repeated intimation of misfensance and falsification directed l

at the Michigan Water Resources Commission and the Dow Chemical Company.

[

The bulk of Saginaw Intervenors' contentions being mere conjecture,

)

unsupported by any facts or scientific bases are an unvorthy reply to i

1 y,l '

80 0714g f39 k,".. -

\\

(

j

,____.t..

-n Arthur W. Murphy, Esq.

2 Dr. Clark Goodman Dr. David'B. Hall February 18, 1972 the great bulk of data and detailed presentation made available to them in the numerous filings of the Applicant and the Staff. As mentioned in Applicant's letter from Mr. Lovenstein of February 15, 1972, Appli-cant intends to file interrogatories on Saginaw Intervenors in order to determine the basert, if any, of their numerous unsubstantiated conclusions and has not made any formal motion to strike at this time.

Respectfully yours,

/s/ John K. Restrick JKR/pb John K. Restrick CC: William J. Ginster, Esq.

Algie A. Wells, Esq.

Irving Like, Esq'.

James A. Kendall, Esq.

David E. Kartalia, Esq.

Milton R. Wessel, Esq.

James N. O'Connor, Esq.

Myron M. Cherry, Esq.

Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

Stanley T. Robinson, Jr.

Hon. William H. Ward i

1 i

--r-e en ep.-...~.,

,w.