ML19329F709
| ML19329F709 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/04/1971 |
| From: | Kartalia D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Goodman C, Hall D, Murphy A Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8007100631 | |
| Download: ML19329F709 (4) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _
-~
y
,,. y
- n UAl.ITYP May 4, 1971 Arthur W. Ibarphy..Esq., Chairman Dr. Clark Goodesa Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Professor of Physics Columbia 5miversity School of Law Dniversity of Mouston Box 38 3801 Cullem Boulevard L
435 West 116th street Ibeston, Texas 77004 New York, use 1erk 10027 L
Dr. Devid B. Emil Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory
?
F. 9. Box 1663 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 In the Matter of Consumers Power Company
[
Midland Plant. Units 1 and 2 Socket Bos. 50-329 and 50-330 Gentlemen L(3 At the close of the conference on May 1,1971, the Board invited all parties to submit not later than May 4, 1971, proposed orders covering matters discussed at that conference. Transeitted here-with is the proposed order of the AEC regulatory staff.
Itaspectfully submitted, David E. Kartalia Counsel for ABC Regaistory Staff Emelosure As stated ec w/aecleamre:
Anthony I' Beismen, Esq.
Milton E. Wessel, Esq.
Robert Lowenstein, Esq.
James A. Kendall, Esq.
Richard C. Smith, Esq.
James E. O'Connor, Esq.
Esteld P. Graves, Esq.
Algie A. Wells, Esq.
William J. Siaster, Esq.
Mr. Stanley T. Robinson, Jr.
Myron M. Cherry, ::sq.
omer >
..OG,g,
_f, g
DEKstkalia:Je nhlhardt SURNAME >
......... [.[
. 5Ldl.71. 8 0 0 7 1 0 6..... 7.................M....
, 7,,
DATE >. 5 /4 /71...
Form AEC-318 (hv. 9-53)
U.s sovutumen manns omCE JN.- 0-Me-598
e g
m UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION BEFORE TIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICEUSING E0ARD In the Matter of
)
)
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
Docket Nos. 50-329
)
50-330 (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2)
)
O RDE" The purpose of this order 'is to set forth the Board's rulings on various subjects discussed at the conference on May 1, 1971.
1.
Resumption of hearing.
The hearing in this matter will resume on June 8,1971, in Midland, Michigan, at a time and place to be specified in a further order of the Beard.
2 Submissien of direct evidence in writing.
On or before May 14, 1971, intervenors.Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group et al. (Saginaw Valley intervenors) and Aeschliman et al. shall submit all of their direct evidence in writing in support of their contentions, including contentions relating to the validity of 10 CFR Part 20.
On or before May 28, 1971, or by such later date as the Board may order for good cause shown, Consumers Power Company (applicant),
the AEC regulatory staff (staff), and intervenors supporting the applica-tion shall serve their direct evidence in writing in opposition to the intervenors' contentions.
3.
Statement of legal contentions of Aeschliman et al.
On or before May 14, 1971, intervenors Aeschliman et al. shall serve a detailed statement of their legal contentions,
')
- 4 Response of Saninaw vallev intervenors to apolicant's answers to interrogatories.
On or before May 14, 1971, the Saginaw Valley intervenors shall serve a statement specifying in what respects, if any, they deem insufficient the information supplied by the applicant in response to their interroga-tories. This statement shall include, with respect to each item of addi-tional information sought, a specification of the reasons why such addi-tional information is needed by said intervenors. On or before May 21, 1971, the applicant shall serve a reply to the statement served pursuant to this paragraph.
5.
Service of certain documents relied on by Saginau Vallev intervenors.
On or before May 10, 1971, Saginaw Valley intervenors shall serve a list of the documents on uhich they rely in seeking reconsideration of rulings by this Board sustaining objections of intervenor The Dow Chemical Company to interrogatories propounded to it by the Saginaw Valley inter-The Saginaw Valley intervenors shall, at the same time specify venors.
the rulings as to which they seek reconsideration and the grounds upon which reconsideration is sought. On or before May 14, 1971, the applicant sha11' provide the Board with copies of the documents listed by the Saginaw Valley intervenors pursuant to this paragraph. On or before May 21, 1971, intervenor The Dow Chemical Company shall serve a response to the Saginaw Valley intervenors request for reconsideration of rulings.
(
6.
Offer of proof by Saginaw va11ev intervonors and Environmental Defense Fund. Inc.
Not later than May 14, 1971, intervenors Saginaw Valley Nuc1 car Study Group et al. add Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., may serve an offer of proof in regard to their contention that Appendix D to 10 CFR Part 50 is invalid.
7.
Interrogatories addressed to the staff by the Saginaw valley intervenors.
The objections of the staff to items 1 through 233 of the Saginaw Valley intervenors' "First Set of Interrogatories.
. Directed to the Atomic Energy Ccamission and the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards" are sustained.
In addition, none of the interrogatories of such set shall be construed as requiring a response by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards or any member thereof. On or before May 14, 1971, the Saginaw Valley intervenors shall serve their response to the staff's general objection to the set and such of the staff's specific objections as are not sustained by this order.
The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Arthur U. Murphy, Chairman i
Dr. David B. Hall May 1971 Dr. Clark Goodman l