ML19329F233
| ML19329F233 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 11/26/1973 |
| From: | Howell S CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Knuth D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19329F231 | List: |
| References | |
| ALAB-106, NUDOCS 8006230757 | |
| Download: ML19329F233 (1) | |
Text
o s
~%
i wL N ! '--
.g
~
L-r_. : m ccasumars 3
[
f E^"I3T
)
fa v
stephen H. Hoveell dO i lgnef
,p e= i 5 j
%ce PresMent
'p cenor.i on.c.. 2is w.. u.cn.g.n 4v.nu. soca.on. u cma.n 4 :Oi.Are. Cod. 517 788 OS50 November 26, 1973 Dr. Donald F. Knuth Regulatory Operations US Atomic Energy Commission Washington, DC 20545
Dear Dr. Knuth:
In accordance with Condition 4 of the Memorandum and Order AIAB-106 dated March 26, 1973 and Amendment No 1 to the Midland Plant construction permits, there are submitted herewith -No (2) copies of the nonconformance report for' October, 19 R This report consists of
)7nd' Quality Audit Findings (OAF) copies of Nonconformance Reports p) that have been closed out and those that have been originated since the 1.v
('
September report was submitted. Copies of UCR and QAF status sheets are also included.
Yours very truly,
.. ~ -
.~
SHH/sjb CC: WEKessler GSheeley dI?.>0 gd.3Q.,f 'v1 O
+800 egg 0 7S o
.L r ?.,
~~
o k._)
/}
NONCONFORMANCE-REPORT LOG & STATUS BOOK neront As or PAGE CoMPL PROJECT NO.
7220 R C. E N G. SIG N l
J PREPARED BY NONCONITORMANCE SOURCE]
NCR NO.
c STATUS DATE CLOSED BY DESCRIPTION /HEMARKS ogspo,g,.
R OUT_E___X M T D. _ REPLY RETD C-1 7-12-7' Disk Grote Wall dowels and Access Tendon Gallery Slab. Unit 2.
Pield PE Re
.asued 8-20-7' Buck Kinney With sketches attached.
PE AA on C-1-1 0-1-1 1-12-7' Dick Grote Wall dovels and Access Tendon Callery Slab.
Field PE l-12-73 8-1h-7[
8-20-7' Bud __Kinner Attached Sketches.
PE AA 8 C-2 S-7-73 Rua fritmov
- 7 Rebars in Containment #1 are Un3ersized PE 0-1-73 10-h-
_/
10-h-73 Buck Kinney PE AA C-3 9-12-73 Steve Grant 28ea #9 Rebars cut off 0 582'-6" to set certain Field PE 7-13-73'0-5-73 10-92' 10-9-73 Steve Grant Columns for supporting frame.
Reactor Blde. #1 PE AA C-4 9-28-73 Clay Clark Liner Plate S-1-6-2-1 veld cracked after Field PE 10-1-73 Application of primo coating.
PE AA C-5 9-28-71 Steve Grarat Trumplates by INRYCo in violation of documentation Field PE 10-1-73 Requirements PE AA g
C-6 10-h-71 Clav Clark Liner Plate S-1-1'2-U-1 Mill Stampg5LRumbers and Field __
PE 10-h-73 Vendor Stamped Numbers do not match.
PE AA C-7 10 8-73 Richard Grote Pour No. CC(576)a Ticket 11787. 6.1% Air & GA" 11 eld PE 10-15-7:
Slump.
Pour CC b1.
Ja Tickets 1179h, 117 1 2._8M respectively.95, 117 36 Air Content 2.1. 2.
PR AA e
10-8-73 Richard Grote Pour No. A(57h)a. Ticket 11711. Low Air Content.&
Field PE
' 0-15-7 en 11712. No Testing.
C-9 10-29-7 3 Clay Clark Liner Plate S1-7-U1 Mill Stamped Numbers and Field Mat'l 10-29-7 3 o Vendor Stamped Numbers do not match.
Spver.
m t,,
ao C-10 10-29-73 Carv W. Knoll 1h" Concreta_Aggr.cgrtte_ failed gradation. U.Edgel _ licld_ _
PE 10-29-73 ing did not retest or notify Bechtel.
PE cc suco serv. ms '.
FAG
- g
I ll l
\\l
, i 1
D T
E R
Y W
L P
]C E
sP %I ND A
r N
P o
G L
T M
A M.
X G
t O N
nC E
oE E
r G C.
T e A nP 0 UO R
T d
MIS l
O e m NI P
i o S
F rt D
o l
3 l 7 A K
O 9 &
O 1
e B
0 s 1
a S
C U
T 3 r A
7 o
T f
8 S
1 A
1 S
0 K
E 1
C G
C R T
O N A L
AM 3 f T
7 ME S
I T
R R 6
A
/
R ON 1
O f
O MI 0
o P
E O T 1
P d
CI R
s r
NR t
o OC r
c E
S o
e C
E N
D p r e
A R
oN M
c R
i O
h 3
p 7 F
a N
r 4
1 O
g 2
C o
i 0
N d
1 O
a N
R k
0 c
2 i
2 r
d 7
Y e
n B
e D
H E
S r
O O
e N
L k
C r
T a
C P
EJ O
M R
P e
A 2~
m T.
7 e
T 4
V E D E
0 R
(
R J _
O C
N N
1 e
W-R
(
c o
C
~
N 1
2.
1.PAGE L OF 1
.3
~
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH y:s F '3, yo ggy yg ATTACHED DATE 9
7 7:
PROJECT NO. 7220 ITEM LOCATION AREA / BLDG.
S. DWG/PART No.
REV.
- 6. ITEM NAME 1+11 O No.
T containnent #1
- 7 Robara E T T
- 17. INSPECT 60N CRITERI A OWG O SPEC E OTHER O (EXPLAIN) DelEvaring of EoinforC1LT
,C f'I ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER 1(EXPs AIN)
Inland-Rvercon Chicaco. Illinois 7220-C-39 11.
NONCONFORMANCE IDISCREPANCYI DESCRIPTION:
ASME YES U 110.
NO 2 No.
(LIST SERI AL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) 1
- 7 Robars in Containment #1 are urderoiced.
Trnnanen Refer to Finn 1 Rnport Tnnpantinn or mbaana minenvnint _me ne mgk T..
Dated August 29, 1973 A s Date Date CONCUHHENC
- 12. NCR PHLPARED BY: / /" / "
Y W
b
$[
/?_
J edE.
- 13. FIELD DISPO$iT10.N:
REWORK O 6;ECT O' ROUTE TO PROJECT /NGRG 2 NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT *L SUPV. O TU l
h t--
O i
.O e
J cc M E Mb) Qvp\\
hr dso-aib li9 ly-3 R iT M e m,
~
su j( jf 6 ll l j l
\\
a IL)]
VUf 5 ]973 F '*/aas - -.
s... __.
s ' v s y ( ((yp*
- - < = * - - -
_IC n ~ -..
ETO.
r.
- 14. FIEi., DISPOSITION BY:
Date APPROVA OF FIEL Ot i IT ON:
Date i4 Cid J
PFE
(
/
'r
/
- Ud*
- 15. ENGRG DISPOSITION:
O m mi mO mu USE AS IS !A SEE BELOW O NO F
/ !M'Y L -
/
f//f5 ///E}8/***G/ *i.CD #V$. A.S c'AL'_E~D 0.'s -r~ /?J ac.ma nw e ren u sw-r-w.eswenom ennm i,w bah DA r[D AM& /m 7-29,/9f/3.
A/M G'T/3F/M '"
~7~/h M /D CPFAs /~ /D S72!!SS L$if ?~o TA//~ ttDDN/M / 7// 1:,
m oo r-cw= nein n rc>
w eA-sra r m
---s.a
- -4'n. Ji/
s'/ /
Yh ND FURTI-MI? AC710/J REQUIIEED Qf M.
9 % *. - -
'5EE.A TTAG/hD lam
/ MA6.h 3
/")
- 17. d&lNsf'ECTION ph %. / /U%yfRb g//** /Doft
.,)
- 16. APPROVAL OF U
ACCEPT l p s;pndote Eng;.4 -
D..
p
///
, vain f,/
ENGRG.
//
DISPOSITION CONCURRE/CE - s a f..'
/ !!/f 'r /*/ Uf ?
RE JE CT O - K' +=* ' V is / 3Date "-
3 G 4h;.ri. -- L
~ ~ ^ ' '
~
f*
' llt /
p p g'
's /.}
.o m
/-'
AUTH. INSr.
CONCURP E NCE : Un inm
/
I)aw C
I-f?l!Yllif tcaf.VsWVMYR f3MC5 - (9). A. (1NG R.
Sat [." LED.% RC# S AITL'CgLE
NA O F 9./.'f'.".'.f.l...'
1 PAGE 1
v/ '.4 - {.
'J - C ~i %,.
\\
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ATTACHED /4; 2'+i
'T~ - ' ed i;AY YF
/
SKETCH T220-FM!-C-17'1,, i.' g II 9
.] ~
PROJECT NO.
7270 4
.- :.1
- 6. ITEM NAME Q Rebar Devele ".i a b 'g,,,1,1s qM pgp ggLOG.
S. DWG/PART No.
REV.
'. * ' 7#
5'/
Bldg. 41 7220-C-107
.[{Y
,?/
- 7. INSPECTION CHITEHI A DOCUMENT NUMBc r4 a TIT LE p-b h>? 's
.s. '
~ '
DWG [2 SPEC O OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-0-307 Rev. h Tenden Gallery retc.ili.
O' ENGRG. O CONsTR.E OTHER O (EXPLAIN)
- w. -
10.
11.
NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION:
ASME YES O, No.
(LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE)
NO 00 1
Twenty-eicht li9 rebar devels extendinre from the tendon callery inner vall to the Reactor Building #1 base slab vere cut off at the concrete line (582'-6") in order to set certain colu=ns for the support framinst system.
See attached 7220- E -C-1h for locations.
See sheets 1 & 2 of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. drawing SW 528626 for column identification.
Oate CONCURRENCE:
Date
- 12. NCR PHEPAHED BY:
p
/3 ead En
/' (
/E/7$
ngr
-ff d s
- 13. FIELD DISPOSITION:
REWORK O Re;ECT C ROUTE TO PROJECT EN' RG @
G NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. C ROUTE TO MAT'L SUPV. O
. A L
.r
_ /-
- 14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY:
Date APPROVAL, OF FIELD DISfQSIJtON:
Date
> U!NbW) <
- t lY5 PFE - - / ll: /
, j.. k7.,y
/
/3 CONCtfRREN/E y
Date AllT H.' t N SP.
- 15. ENGRG DISPOSITION:
REPAIR O REJECT O
DCN REOD:
YES O DCr4 No.
USE AS IS N SEE BELOW O NO M l.
N'e e.<r.. t & km )/u. *9 <b w /c s e dran Nk c- /d iir s < e. i A.W<:.
on
?.
W " A t/c rh w N.us/e ) 54, N re-!
xee,,;e es,. e s / o l' r* a
.b. ~., /e..n d l~. i...,/ e './
SM sl<',e+ory.
'l eu r e c E. re /+,n ?%f en % ei[ia73 Af /4'i /y ;-
6
. Jr?).L NN/, s
^
/ r4 Fe o tr! a H m r a y,!
W, 6.e t=
.U. u Ju L I 72 n
,s
{}
j
- 16. APPROVAL O
,a 7
e,
- 17. H EINSPECT t ON ACCEPT
/
Date' pp,, q,,
ENGRG.
f.
D.1-h+' e",M *. A. ]
M/ J 8 b/M L's M1\\ *
/ o ',D-REJECT O w "= q 7.
- -. y tj< e PFE' DISPOSITION CONCURRE'NCE h
Date AUTH. INSP CONCURRENCE: A ii s - i nw--- *
--- - -- O se n.- ~ l
9 2"
PAGE 1 OF 1 NONCONF0RMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yes O 3.
MO DAY YH h h3 AWACHED I
PROJECT NO.
7220 DATE 10
- 3. BTEM LOCATION AR E A/B LDG.
S. DWG/PART No.
REV.
- 6. BTEM NAME Q No.
1 21 Crntain=ent Liner S-1-1h-U-1 Liner Plate Assembly v G O SPEC 3 OTHER 5 (EXPLAIN)
~
- 8. SOURCE:
ENGRG. O CONSTR.O OTHER 1] (EXPLAINI Southern Boiler & Tank Works, Mecchis, Tenn.
7220-C-50 10.
11.
NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREF ANCY) CESCRIPTION:
ASME YES O No.
(LIST SERF AL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE)
NO M 1
Liner Plate S-1-1h-U-1 Heat and slab nt.mbers sta= ped on plate do not agree.
Mill Stamos Heat - 518A2799 Slab - A h2630 Vendor Stamp:
Heat - 518Z2299 Slab - A h2631 e
e Date
- 12. NCR PREPAHED BY:
Date CONCUHHENC EeSo"e",'f'jd m._O M
/vA//' 7.ar l
$'7r O.4 F. d __
/o 73 g
. FIELD DISPOSITION:
REWORK 2 REJECT O ROUTE TO PROJECTINGRG 1 NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT *L SUPv. O 1
r We have checked the Southern Boiler documentation package which includoc photostatic i
copies of the Eethlehem Steel Coro. test reports.
Heat and slab numbers sta=ced by the mill can not be traced to the documentation forms, but nu=bers stamoed by the vendor can and are traceable to mill documentation.
The field reco=mendation is j
that we obliterate the mill sta=p an.1 use the vendor stamped number for ident-ification.
- 14. FIELD DISPOSITION BY:
Date APPROVA OF FIEt, DISPOS TLON:
Date flh YA ppE
./1 /
)) f M 7.! 0 l
s 0 V O.ruAO ~
jo 7 % ??$"Ns'P ?
I]
P"
" ~
is. E.scHo DisrOSiriON.
Repair O REJECT O
DCN REQO:
YES O oCu No.
USE AS IS O SEe BEtow 0 NO O w
E5 PPHOVAL OF Date
- 17. H EINSPECTION Resp nscie Eny.
Date ENGRG.
Date PFE Date REJECT O Hespmote Lc J Ergr.
Date DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE
-rr
V PAGE 1 OF 1 i
f-
.S NONCONFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH va 0 3.
MO DAY YH A M CHED PROJECT NO.
7220 DATE 10 8
73 TEM LOCATICN AR E A/B LDG.
- 5. DWG/PART No.
REV.
l6. ITEM NAME 1.12 Q No.
Entainment Unit # 2 Uot applicable Concrete
- 7. INSF ECTION CRITERI A DOCUMENT NUMBER & TITLE DWG O SPEC 3 OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-c-230
^
ENGRG. O CONSTR.D OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 10.
11.
MONCO,NFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION:
ASME YES O No.
(LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE! APPLICABLE)
NO E 1
Pour No.
CC (575)a Mix A-2 Date 9-28-73 Lean concrete backfill south of Containment Unit # 2 Access Gallery Vall Ticket #11787 (8 c.y.) placed with 6.1% air content and 54" slumn 2
Pour No. Cc (581.25)a Mix A-2 Date 10-2-73 Lean concrete backfill south of Containment Unit #2 Access Gallery Wall Ticket #1179h (8 c.y. ) placed with 2.1% air content
- 11795 (8 c,.y.) placed with 2.6% air content
- 11796 (8 c.y.) placed with 2.5M air content 1
9 o _
f m
d 10 8h
b' R pon b e e
0-8 73 Engr.
Lead Engr.
- 13. FIELD DISPOSITION REWORK O RE;ECT O ROUTE TO PRO;ECT ENGRG 2 NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT *L SUPV. O
&2 Adjustments cade during the placement to correct deficiencies.
Field eneineers and quality control engineers have been instructed that " lean concrete backfilI' is governed by the same specifications as structural concrete.
No specification relaxation is allowed.
Field recoc= ends acceptance of "in place" concrete backfill J
Field Reco=mendation:
Use as is In F ~
QI OS6T % : 4 Date APPHOVAL FIELD ITION:
Dat; 14./
t PPE Tv As
<m a t,.d
/ chb.1 e
d rote 10-8-73 CONCURRENCE [
(- }
/
Date A UTH.* lN SP
- 15. ENGHG D&O5tTION:
O O
m em mO ea P
USE AS IS O SEE BELOW O NO O 1C APPROVAL OF Date
- 11. HEf NSF'ECTION ACCEPT O n,,,on,,eie Engr.
- Dat, ENGRG.
Date Date REJECT O Responsible Lead Engr.
Date DISPOSITION ONCURRENCE AUTH. INSP CONCURRENCE: U n.insa.
oste W HI T E - (.W. [j N G R.
PIN K - Q.A. ENG R.
SHADED ARE AS APPLICABLE O
PAGE 1 OF 1 M.*
y N O N t, J N F 0 R M A N C E REPORT SKETCH Yes 3.
MO DAY YR ATTACHED PROJECT NO.
7220 DATE 10 8
7.
l'12 ITEM LOCATION AREA /BLOG.
- 5. D/JG/PART No.
REV.
- 6. ITEM NAME Q No.
liary Building 7220-C-201Q, h
Concrete DOCUMENT NUMBER & TITLE
- 7. INSPECTION CRITERI A OwG O SPEC G OrnER O (EXPLAIN) 7220-C-230 ENGRG. O CONSTR.2 OTHER O (EXPLAIN) 10.
11.
NONCONFORMANCE (DISCREPANCY) DESCRIPTION:
ASME YEs O NO $
No.
(LIST SERIAL NUMBERS WHERE APPLICABLE) 1 Pour No. A(8;7hla Mix D-2 Date 9-2h-7'4 Auxiliary Bldg. Structural Concrete Total placed 220 c.y.
Ticket #11711 (8 c.y.)
placed with low air content Ticket #11712 (8 c.y.) placed with no testing See attached copies of tickets 11701 thru 11718 showing air entraining dosages used and corresponding test results.
Ticket 11711 was spot checked for air content.
Previous results did not indicate truck should be held for results.
n r
n Date
- 12. NCR PREPAL.- v/
Date CONCUHRENCK
]
"",P"'#'7 I $1 Gr[To 10-8-73 "eTe"$' It. rdb, rote 10-8-73 K1 n
- 13. FtELD DISPOSITION:
REWORK O REJECT O ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGRG 3 NOTIFY AUTHORIZED INSP. O ROUTE TO MAT *L SUPV. O 1
Air m'eters were checked for accuracy Dosage of A.E. A. was continually increased until a h.5fo was obtained on ticket 11718
+
Fluctuating air content attributed to flyash 2
Adiustment made during placement to correct deficiency.
Field eneineers and quality control enginee:s have been instructed that " lean concrete backfill" is governed by the same specifications as structural concrete.
No specification relaxation is allowed.
Field Recc=mendation: Use as is.
f APPROVApOF FIELp DISPO (TION:
pate Date 14.F 00 ?OS ON8 :
[.? I '
2
/$
PFE SE f *
/.
nu oe 10-8-73 CONCURRENC[ ~
~
'[
7 ate "
- 15. ENGRG DISPOSITION:
O na O
m mm mO 'ma P
USE AS IS O SEE BELOw 0 NO O Date
- 17. R EINSPECTION
- 16. APPROV AL OF CCEPT O se,,ons,eie Eng,.
o,,
ENGRG.
Date Date REJECT O wawe w %
=
DISPOSITION ONCURRENCE AUTH. INSP.
CONCURRENCE: Auti inso.
Dat '
OC - 2NCH WHITE - O C. ENGR.
PIN K - O.A. ENG R.
SHADED AREAS AfPLICABLE R EV. 7 1-72 NN aswmrTY4T6JTF2J3fYen Tf@ M9R MMP@R)@GSTg
PAGE 2 OF 2
~
e,.+. 6 N O Nr1N F O R M A N C E R E P O R T -~
N;. C-8
../
CONTINUATION SHEET A AC4ED DATE 10 g 7,-
PROJECT NO. 7220
- 11. NONCONFORMANCE IDISCREPANCY) CONT *O or
[
3' h No.
- 13. FIELD DISPOSITION CONT *O or
.ONT*O 15.
ENGRG. DISPOSITION CONT *O 10.
- 1. (Cont.) Ticket 11711 and 11712 was placed before corrective action was taken.
2.
PonrA(580.0)a Mix A-2 Date 10-3-73 Lean concrete backfill south of Auxiliary 31dg.
Ticket #11817(8 c.y.)placedwith7.8%aircontent
~
4 9
i e.
e
[
WHITE - O.C. ENGR.
PIN K - Q.A. ENGR.
OC - 3NCR ovumm
/J.. f f, j
',.e PAGE 1 _ OF 1 p,e,'g, C-10 s
NON
)NFORMANCE REPORT SKETCH Yes O a.
f.*o oAv Yr 10 29 f73 A
A" PROJECT NO.
7.220 DATE
- 4. lTEM LOCATION ARE A,C LOG.
- b. UWG:PART No.
RI V.
G. ITE T.i is' A!.'E 18 Q No.
__CCUQIe_tq ?".iCh E nnt Spac, 7220-C-200OvCV..iN T isJ.c.2.Tt K TT;_L cCO'.craic_i n ecatn ( 13" 1
. lisSPECT40N CHITE Hl A s a. c Owc 0 SPEC M OTHen O ExetAifel spec. 7220-C-208 ncv. 2, 6: Spec. 7220-C-230 Rev. 2 Ayogg53
- 9. P.O. No.
ENGi1G. C CONSTR.O OTHER 3 UEXPLAlfil U. S. Tertin Ia_he.r. ntory On Sit' L'ho"'to"
???O-C-203 10.
11
. ONCO *4F OL'ANCE t E,l.c6 ti'A'.0 ) DE LI M I 6 0N -
AS*.*E YES
.J No.
(LIST EERIAL NOVCERS Wi!ERE ArPLfCLELEI NO 1 1
The_1&" cQDCrete.. CrrcSaic_.12rted dm' irs._pl:C"~ " of IaPn co"""*+" h'^'#411 ""
Octoher 17. $ 19. ani_22 1073 f-ilei_c: rd'tien.
- b ecmce+d va Wien t'9 e tfMCn.3110 10._the ruheentr;Cir- 's fr 41nva to vnts;:e+ thn n g2gn_t n n
+n nntic,,
the Bachtel representativ cf the preble..
- 12. NCH PnEeAhtp BY:
Odte COf 4CUHH ENCE:
Date 3
/' :
. !s'*
/h2_'-? V'I
$n?
b1r \\_ Qs k
lb 29 'l's ?e d E7.y REWORK REJECT ROUTE TO PROJECT ENGRG k)
- 13. FIE LD DISPOSITION:
- NOTIFY AUTHOnlZED INSP. O ROUTE TO f.*AT'L SUPv. O 1
On October 23 197'4 Bechtel bnce::.s_.n:mr of the s rad'itinn failn w n-t+
+1* i n k
I tima 4 - ed2-to steps vern tnion to ne wnnt th.s die-va7,nninn_
TTnitoa stntae vaenaneibi14 t r of tuo_ rotarts for ennh Tea 11Dg_la,b.Qm+drf rrgt4 ff ed cf thejv 7
fniinrn nna to noti fy thm Vanhtml vap-n e n n- t i vs n f n y fn 41 nvo c.
,/ /
o OF flLL D QiSPOhiTION:
Dat
- 14. FIELD OISPOSITION BY:
Date APPHOVAp/-
(:,. i'. 7..,'
i r d.. c ere Dsta
)
(LW.(.(/,
r.
{.(,
(6-29 ~l 3 U$ENCE /
f id. ENGHG Did1'OSIIION:
O RE;ECT O
OCN REQD:
YES fJ DCN No.
REPAIR USE ASIS U SEE BELOw 0 No O
- 6. APPROVAL OF gm.
y 7, g g g,
~
ACCEPT 1 ENGRG.
Oate Hqnst# Ea.r.
0;g,
- h'.
.N' /.:
'.*]
V.~
Date RE.*ECT O
'jIMoYiIIELYicrsr.
ba PFE DISPOSITION CONCUPRENCE AU T H. N m - - - - -
COi,CIS. n ;NCL -
Am, n,
~
hiELO NGR.
OLDENHOD ESP. ENGR.
c.
t, 'y y,
g C
[
j f p' g..< 3.'
,'PAGE 1 OF 1
,~
d No.
y_1
~,,
if.
NON JNFORMANCE nEPORT SKETCH Yes 3.
MO DAY YF A
CHED PROJECT NO. 7220 No DATE 10 25 73
- 4. lTLM LOCATION AR E A,f;U5G.
'). DWG.'PART No.
RE V.
G. ITEM NAME O No. M1 I
N.hSEdnhf..
EZ-C-3h
/. 8 N,l'L CT it.,N Cl 1 E hl A DGCUI'* NT \\t li. Le E
oWG O SPEC M OTHER C IEXPLAIN;JLov 0 P*a 3._9
~
~
ADDaLSS
- 9. P.O. f o.
L. SCUMCE :
ENGnu. O CONS 1H...I OThEn x (E;.rLAiNi c
X-E y Jyr. 11'8 CF.em Er, -Te xter Cit.. C Llif..9!d:0L E 8M 10.
- 11. < f40NLOt F O!1M A G *DidCN r..u y ! CLLCn.r a TON:
g,3.g y g,,
No.
(L:ST SE HI AL NU.VDEDS t'.HERE AlfLICAPLEl NO 3 1
Rad _iocr_nhic R:rorte dated 10/16/73; 10/18/73 c3_ d 10/19))_3, show a Kr. J.111rtrc= c.9 Radiographer on lino 2.
Radiographic Report dr;tod 10/2h/73_showc a Mr. J. Cace as Radiographer On line 2.
Cur records shou no ASI;T-TC-1 A Qualificctions 'for thece two men.
la. Nca rau' art'D tsY:
/e r Oate CONCUHf3 ENCE:
Date "7"*),"/
/.h' j
(( '..A 10/25/13_ Ue'IEE$f_ M 2 -e:rk @ < "
__10225/13_
- 13. HELD DiSeOs: TION:
RtwOsk O REJECT C ROUTE TO PROJECTINGRG O NOTIFY AUTHOnlZED INSP. O NOUTE TO M AT*L SUPV. O
,1 fie-subiit the subject Radic5 zaphic Reports with line 2 Blank, or uith the Cw11fied l
I Radiograrhers name in this ', pace.
If Qualified Radiographer is used, his papers cast be in RC Rocerd Tile's at 3ite.
Por Section it. Para, h.1 Pa;te 2 of 77 of X-Ray Engineerinr Q. A.
Manual f
d 14.f'lELD DISPOSITION SY:
APPROVAL OF F&LD D6SPOSiT/ON:
i.O. ?
Date
,Date
\\
(" D
$.'s * * * ?? !>l 7. C ',- :
~
ppg a
/
\\
p.11,,
%., CONCURHEf!CE/
( )
/
D5' 5'l 4
AUTH 'lN SP _ __
REPAIR O RE;ECT U
DCN REQD:
YES O oCN No.
USE AS IS O SEE BELOW D NO O
~
~
OVALOF Date
- 11. REINbt EC TlON ACCEPT O ENGRG.
Date nc; pons,n,c Eny,.
c.,,,
PFE D.s te REJECT C Respons.u'e Lc;J Eny.
Da OISPOSITION CONCURRENCE AUTH. IN SP....._
CO NCU R P E f'CE :
Auth. In a (St V.3 :11 E - Q.C. ENGP..
PIN K - O A.ENG G.
SHAL E D AT:C AS.'.t.LtO/ RLE O C - 2 N f. R CANARY - FIELD INGR.
GOLDENROD - HESP. ENGR.
TO AS*.1E COMPONENTS R E V. 7.1 72
,m STATUS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT FINDINGS (QAF)
/
\\
-\\
/
QAF No.
STATUS COFDfENT From Construction audit July 17-19,1973 (Audit No. C-1) 001 Corrective action completed and verified.
002 Corrective action completed and verified.
From Engineering audit September 5-9, 1973 (Audit No. E-2)
QA #1 &
QA #18 Open Corrective action due date extended to 12/31/73 From Construction audit October 15-18, 1973 (Audit No. C-2) 1 (C 1)
Open Corrective action due 11/16/7' 2 (C-2) -
Corrective action completed and verified.
3 (C-2) 4 (C-2)
Open Corrective action due 11/5/73 q
5 (C-2)
Open Corrective action due 11/16/7:
6 (C-2)
Corrective action completed and verified.
7 (C-2)
Open Corrective action due date extended to 12/10/73 8 (C-2) -
Corrective action completed and verified.
9 (C-2) 10 (C-2) -
Open Corrective action due 11/16/7:
12 (C-2) 13 (C-2)
Corrective action completed and veri.fied.
.i 14 (C-2) -
Open Corrective action due 11/16/7 l 15 (C-2) 16 (C-2)
Corrective action ecmpleted and verified.
17 (C-2)
Open Corrective action due 11/26/7 18 (C-2) -
Open Corrective action due 11/16/7 20 (C-2) 21 (C-2)
Open Corrective action due 11/5/73
\\
22 (C-2) -
Open Corrective action due 11/16/7
-26 (C-2
l.....
C UAUTY AUDIT FlilDil1G 001 7 17-73 1
g,,,,,
Midland Job No. 7220 Systems 0,..
J. Dotson
- ...m 1-10 2
ALAB-106 Restonse C. Finney t.....u.................................
Aptlicant's report on Quality Assurance action
.be'ine undartnken - Restence to.ALA3-106 (1) "Bechtel...has prepared procedures...They' are being carried out within basic franework of their Quality Assurance Iwgran."
...Nonconfor=ances, if any...will be...docu=ented in accordance with the
,(2) detailed procedures set forth in...the Bechtel Field Inspection Manual."
C:,ntain=ent liner plate coating inspection conducted May 1 and May 2,1973 by Messrs. Newco=b, Grote, Hondorp and Einson with the following results:
"Three "lates exhibited defects sufficient to require co=plete re= oval and replacenent
? the prine coating." The following defects were observed:
,;v Mad cracking - 12 plates Weld spatter - 3 plates Overspray
-3 plates Dry Spray
- 3 plates
- 4 plates Sags and Runs-4 plates Rusting Tha$eportreco==endedsandblasttoso=eextentonallplatesemined. No non-confor=ance report was generated as a result of this inspection and this is a d parture fron require =ents of (1) and (2) above.
Reco==endation (1) Prepare NCR's to cover inspection results as recorded in Inspection Nu=ber 2.0 or (2) Change CPCo subnitted response to ALAB-106 to delete reference to carrying out inspection within basic franework of Bechtel QA Progran.
8/17/73 E. Felton
<...m...............
Inspection plan C-L-1 (a to f) C-111-1 plan no. Log No.156 has been i=ple=ented and has been in force since 10/12/73 d*
s
+
A
^
....,y g
10/19/73 wd
_m 2...-........g...........-
i y
Q l &
fj
'f k A.
~
[
sJAllTY Al]DIT FillDlilG
... 7...17-73
.x j 2
JO
'.u-Midland 7220 Systens 0- -
J. rotsen
...m.
Civil I)iscioline Epec 208A b
la 2
TL Cmta (1) NOAM Section II Ho. 6 Para.12d (2) ML G 2 Pen 7h (1)
... Standard specifications issued by the discipline Chief Engineer... subject to his approval, modifications are made...for project use... changes to and interpretations of specifications are acco=plished through revisions or addenda."
'(2)
"The field change request provides field engineering with a means of reporting to project engineering discrepancies in project specifications."
T;chnical specification U-208 was modified by field and included in subcontract
- 7220-FSC-141 prior to obtitining approval of changes from originating group. No field request was made as required by FIM.
p............
Submitspecificationtoorigi.2atinggroupforapproval/issueviafieldchangerequest procedure.
m _..............
8/20/73 E. Felton g..
Spscification C-208A was prepared in the field.
Ther2 was no discrepancy in arq project
] specification. After preparation, the specification was reviewed and approved by engineerin then issued to the Subcontractor for use prior b ar y Q, related testing work.
(See cttached letter from P. A. Martine: to E. E. Felton dated July 16,1973). The FCR will utilized to request Project Engineering approval of pquested changes and/or discrepancie t3 cpecifications.
.0 t
.....,...................6.,.
( L J. R f d ~....,. ~
o
%.....h&
. % e. a
- m...... 3....w.
6"*MtW F0WER COMPAp.1s, --..
6]p.
h 5 h '[ [ { i u
$1
...U -23 g ' CT 2 91973 ouAUTY AUWT NDMG C
J 10/15/73 n.....
MIDLAND PLANT PROJh
--M tDemogftgigaj,.......
me,a.s,...w.m.-
.tidirnd 7220 Construction g.....
l J. Dotson 9
1 Field Inspection Manual C. Kinney p.~....................,..............
NQAM Section 111 No. SM.
T ctatus of inspections and tests performed on individual items shall be kncwn or rccdily determinable, e
.i !
~J f fi
.i ~.. i,. ~,. ' -
~
I l
's
['l i
l
- C x! -
../ /,'. :
N(/
7,..
C:nctruction is using the inspection plan in lieu of tags, markings, etc. The auditor can find no acknowledgement in the procedures that one of the objectives of the inspection pi,rn is to provide identification, inspection and test status.
V C:nstruction to investigate and determine if Quality Control group intends to use any system cthar than inspection plans to indicate inspection and test status.
Request change in FIM procsdures for use of inspection plans or other means to indicate status.
11/16/73 D. R. Johnson
.,m a...............
g
(
i Y
.{-..........
-- ~
y.m.L. n.......,7.......
.;r.
=..g.
4
- C-*)
~
[JAl.lTY AUDIT FliiDiliG
/
10/18/73
/
sd g,,,,.
.,u,,..........,..u..
M 7220 Construction C*"'"
.......J_._H..o.t n en p_..i.d.la.nd n.
'I' - bl on-nn n 2
h Field EngineeMnc.....
.m...................,...........
FIM G-1 4.0 Tha PFQCE will coordinate all field request to revise existing FDI procedures..... All change requ:sts ara to be submitted to, approved and coordinated by the Chief Field Quality Control Engineer prior to the change being incorporated.
Tha Froject Field Engineer developed / issued procedures for design document' control, referencir vendor QA requirements and vendor design review.
ha are no measures established that identifies the field engineer as the responsible Thepreceduresshownoreviewapprovalsignature(s).
~ mtLividual for this activit/.
s
...<..s.....
Submit proposed procedural changes to chief field quality control engineer. Mark existing distributed copies of above referenced procedures to indicate non-applicable status.
m................
" October 19, 1973 E. Felton
" Propoced procedure change submitted to the Chief Field Quality Control Engineer on August 27, 1973, copy of the letter attached. Existing distributed copies of Document Controlled Precadure have been recalled and will be reissued with markings indicating nonapplicable ettus.
f r
............%................., dw : e2
~Lha 6h j
Dahha
...W!b9--
. _...................E...
JA&M '
U B
"" y r-R
3 (C-2)
O q;. V -
~
udAUTY AUDIT FINDING 10/18/73 m
, j, N
g],,,,.
.m.,.2....-...,....,..
Midland 7220 Construction 0
- c. Richardson
,m1.....
3 Materials Receiving Files D. Frey/C. Kinney NQAM Section 1 No. 9, Para. 3.7 f NQAM Section 2, No. 4, Attach. A u......
. PFQCE reviews field purchase orders for Q-List items.
7,.....,
1 There is no docu=ented evidence on the Field Materials Requisitions that the PFQCE
)
rp'?ews field purchase orders.
For exa=ple Field Purchase order C-244 (Cadwelds).
[
)
\\m./
n.,...........
PFQCE to review and sign-off on "Q" listed FMR's.
i "11/5/73 E. E. Felton
....u...............
m
/
\\
)
I! T c..
=To-.G..
l0
-- w 2 C.Mm,r.T,,T.w........
,o"
= - - - -
=-
=,,..w..
4 (C-2) udAl.lTY AUDIT FINDlilG
/
.. -.. ~
10/18/73 f3
- G';
~,aU...r.T mi......
,,m.....
Midland 7220 Construction J. I. Dotson
-m.......
1 7
Field Engineering T. Valenzano
......................r,..................
- (1) NQAM Section IV Number 1-3
- (2)
FIM G-1 3.3
.i (1) The project field engineer... supervises field engineers of various disciplines whom he trains... "
~
(2)
Field engineers have the following quality related activities:
Initiates field procurement documents Verify construction activities for compliance with program criteria Perform inspection activities of record Review of project documentation 7,..
Docu=cntation of indoctrination / training of field engineers completed to date and planned has not been maintained.
m
)
/
\\J "L........,...
D;valop docu=entation for indoctrinai. ion / training program completed to date and planned.
O L...................
"11/5/73 E. E. Felton
{Lt.,'............
f
\\s' I
..'..':.T.t.M.
l
~'
, ;; L *' ;;.T.............,...
~ ~ ~ " * ~ ~ -
s.y JAl.lTY AUDIT Fli!Dli!G J..(.C-2) 10-15-73 8.
m.....
.IIDLAND 7220 CONSTRUCTION O....a G. RICHARDSON 9
h PROJECT FILES L. ALBERT, H. FOSTER 4.. u.~....,..........................
SPEC. 7220-C-231 RE7. O PARA. 10.7 P.S. A.R. APPEIDIX $C n
"A manufacturers representative experienced in exothermic splicing of reinforcing bar, shall be pr:sent at jobsite at outset of work"........
~
7,...,
Thura is no documentation toinicate that the factory representative who was on the jobsite at the outset of splicing was experienced in exothermic splicing of reinforcing bar.
...p i
'O
.. ~...........
Obtain required documentation.
l 11/16/73 E. E. Felton
.n,.............
6 s-,
N
.;->..-....e p.~,.~........................
l
]
- ,. a
- - - n -
6 (C-2) udAUTY AUDIT FINDING 4
/
..,. ~.
10-15-73 m(j g...,.
r. mr.....
__ MIDLAND 7220 CONSTRUCTION C *" '* *
....m....I.'.H..ARSgi G RI 9
Q.C. FILES L. ATlAMT.
W. POSwl
... m................................
FIM G-1 PARA. 6.3 j
"All blocks on Inspection Report forms shall contain an' entry. Where the signature requirement is on the form, the inspector will enter his signature rather than initials."
1 l
Block 28 on form QC-08, "Cadweld Production and Test Report" has not been signed.
I t
v n..ww.eC...W
.C...
Implement correct useage of Form QC-08.
.............r..................
l 11/5/73 E. E. Felton v) f t.T7. ~.. i..,
j
[4km..................
- '=
e
utJAl.lTY AUDIT FINDING
_.,_!-2) 7 6"
10/15/73 qt
~./
m;. a.;.m..,......
.....,w...
g,...
Midlend 7220 Construction O.,...
G. Moulton a........
S
- 1. 6. & 7 Field Engineering Pat Nichols
. FlM G-2 Rev. 3 Para. 3.3.1.2 c,,o.......
"Tha Project Field T.ngineer shall review or revise and sign the distribution list.
\\
- 0. D.
4e i
Evidrnce of review by Project Field Engineer not apparent.
(,
t i
v' l
=...........
Tha drawing distribution list should be reviewed and signed by PFE.
.....~...............
"10/31/73
" E. E. Felton
_90.. C, 4,8.....s.
,....e
- 6. I t
/
1
(
/
%j z,,-... -.....
,,,. ~ s..
~ --
~ -
~
~. -
~
8 (C 2) 6'-
udAUTY AUDIT FINDING 10/15/73
... n.
N Midland 7220 Construction 0
.e =
A. Walker p.m....
14 Quality Control C. Kinney
., ~.............................
- FIM, G-6, Para. 3 3.2 and 3.1'.3 A.
"All changes made on a released " Record Copy" of an Inspection Plan sh.11 be made by a quality Control Engineer.
Released " Record Copy" Inspection Plans may require changes necessitated by revisions to prascribed Project requirements and Program Criteria. All such changes will be controlled by r: vision numbers to the Plan."
i B.
"QC hold points shall be identified in the Inspection Plan.,...."
i h
- ~=~
Material Re eiving Instructions are being used in lieu of Inspection Plans.
A.
A written correction was made on Material Receiving Instruction C-1.
Although the change l
initialed the document had not been revised and reissued.. See block 10, item A.
%J B.
No hold points were specified on the Material Receiving Instructions reviewed.
{.'............
A.
Have the subject Material Receiving Instruction revised, reviewed, approved, and reissued.
B.
Specify hold points on Material Receiving Instructions, since these instructions can be used as an citernate to Inspection Plans.
4 J
l 3,....................
11/5/73 E. E. Felton
.,..u.k..........
I tb
- ,...... v....
A w. cc............... i...,...
~
i O '_'
.-.mye,,
,g 4.,-
_g
- pg-py--n-.,.e,
.%w-
pm utJAl.lTY AUDIT FINDING M. -)
10/16/73
,y
')
l'%, /
g,,,,
u.,m.........,...
Construction g......
A. Walker Midland, Job 7220 m......
10 12 Quality Control J. Miller Field Inspection Manual, G-h, Section 2 3
,......v "The Equipment List includes the project identification number, the manufacturer's serial A.
nur.ber, model number, and the interval of accuracy verification."
"The certification label is affixed to the equipment and displays the date of certificatic B.csrtification expiration date, and the identification of the agency performing the accuracy verification."
C.
" Manufacturer's data shall be available for review."
S Attached Shee
,...to
/
\\
t i
A,.,,/
......r..r......
Implement the requirements of procedure G-4 of the FIM.
s 11/16/73 E. E. J'elton
.......a ;.........
- l j
...s.e.ss.....
...#.8......
......,T
..e.4,..
II j
i
._.a.
kh.w.....................
=
g..
__w
m y
~
O)
G 9 (C-2)
BLOCK 11 The method used for Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment did not meet certain requirements of procedure G-4 of the FIM in the following areas:
1.
The Equipment List required by block 10-A'did not contain the interval of accuracy verification (of calibration).
The work sheet did not show the interval of accuracy verification for 33 items.
2.
The labeling system described in block 10 -o 'cas not been implemented.
Seven items were checked and none had the label described in block 10.
Two had labels giving the date of last calibration and initials of the person perfomring the calibration only. One of these units, a Magna Magic unit, model MS-27, serial #LEB 5175, had a sticker indicating calibration November 23, 1971. This unit does not appear in the list of measuring and test equipment.
3.
Manufacturer's data was not available on all items.
4.
Section 2.3 (d) and (e) refer to a certification report.
Cercification was available only on a few items.
5.
The project identification. number noted in paragraphs (g) and (h) of section 2.3 of tha FIM is not affixed to the equipment checked.
6.
The equipment list used ~ (paragraph f) is an informal list filled out in ink with mark - throughs and erasurs.
7.
The Measuring and Testing Equipment Maintenance Record is not being completed and utilized as specified by FIM, Appendix A.
(S)
- 4..
- 3...._..
udAl.lTY AUDIT FINDli!G
..!-2) i i
i 10/18/73
.O i.
4 v
g,,,,,
7a,%........,......
Midlcnd, Job 7220 Construction D.-.-
A. Walker 4
2 Q. C. Files J. Miller
" Project Special Provisions Notice, SF/ PSP #1, Section 4.6.7 -- FIM, G-6, 3.1.3 C Hold points are designated inspection tasks which shall be performed by the QC Enginner and beyond which work shall not proceed without the inspection task being cctiefectorily co=pleted by the QC Engineer."
3.
" Items received without required documentation shall be held in " HOLD FOR QC CLEARANCE" sestus until the required documentation is received and accepted."
v....
A nu=bar of inspection plans did not specify " HOLD POINTS" for required documentation and inspection requirements cet.
Examples are:
m 1.
Master Inspection Plan C-R-1 U)
/
~
2.
Inspection Plan C-39-2 3.
Inspection Plan C-33-1
.._...m......
Evaluate hold point application and provide calrification 11/16/73 D. R. Johnson u....
/ \\
l l
\\
' (
/
m,-
,,.....r................,,.....
pum r m.,.............
n-
,_w
C z........
11 (C-2) udAUTY AUDIT FINDING
..... _ ~
10/15/73
/
g),,..
..u.,.........,......
Midland, Job 7220 Construction O....
A. Walker
......... = -
v*...........
l"............
4 l l-A thru l-G Field Inspection Manur.1 l
NQAM Introduction, Caction IV S:;e Attached Sheet.
~
A.
A number of conflicts exist between the FIM and the sections of the NQAM quoted.
The FIM does not contain requirements for receiving, storing, protecting, and hissuingofmaterialsandequipmentasrequiredbyquotation"B"inblock10.
G 3.
The FIM is not organized as required by quotation "C" in block 10.
....av.........
""The program is receptive to changing conditions and the manual is designed to incorporate ravisions and changes promptly as the need arises.
Requests for changes to the NQAM should be cent to the Manager-Quality Assurance, preferably in the form of a proposed draft.
The
}hnaget Quality Assurance will arrange for evaluation and appropriate approvals of the proposed change, and if incorporated will send the revised caterial to holders of the manual."
A rzquest should be submitted by the procedure stated to resolve the conflicts between the NQAM and the FIM.
"11/16/73 D. R. Johnson
- ~ ^
u...............
l 1
1 m,
~~~ ~
,p,......m...
i
" 7fe=.......................
- T.
-~ ~
l w..
= = -
-= ~ " !
.1 10..
A.
The NQAM Introduction states, p
"The Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual is the primary document (j!
for all phases of the Quality Assurance Program. The require 4 ments of the NQfl1 shall govern except in cases of conflict with the QC Manual-ASIE Nuclear Components.
In such cases the ASMS manual shall govern unless the requirements of the NQAM are more stringent.
B.
The NQAM,Section IV, Number h, states,
" Receiving, inspecting, storing, protecting, and issuing.of materials and equipnent at the jobsite are n:complished by the Materials Supervisor and his personnel with technical assistance rendered by Field Engineers when needed, in accordance
~
with requirements in the Field Inspection' Manual."
C.
The NQAM,Section IV, Nuhbar 5, states,
" Field inspection is carried out in accordance with procedures given in the Field Inspection Manual, the Quality Control Manual - ASIE Nuclear Components, and any special project requirements.
Field inspection procedures provided in the FIM are organized according to discipline into the following sections.
Section 1 - General Section 2 - Civil / Structural Section 3 - Electrical Section h - Mechanical Section 5 - Welding Section 6 - Forms"
}
- V t
Lm.
.3 g
12 (C-2) uuAUTY AUDIT FiliDil1G
.. ~..
10/15/73 p)
- L.J
- p..u.
.u..,m......,.. m.
Midland, Job 7220 Construction C. ~....
A. Walker 6
2 Material Receiving Frey & Mathews
.... u.
NQAM,Section V, No. 1 t,...n.-
. "Tha sverall quality assurance program is conducted in accordance with the provisions cf cha Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual. The program is supplemented by the Field Inspection Manual, the Procurement Inspection Department Manual, and the Bechtel Quality Control Manual - ASME Nuclear Components."
7,.....
The purchase material receiving area is utilizing three documents, (1)
Project Special Provisions Notices #1 (2)
Material Control Procedure, FI-101 and (3)
Field Procurement P 7rdures.
Only the Project Special Provisions Notice shows review and approval signatures, l.,
3he copy being used was a xerox copy and could not be considered controlled.
e4.'...e.....
Provide approved, controlled direction to materials group.
- ,.. ~ u.............
11/16/73 E. E. Felton 4...
n 8
.w/
. T., "* ara...................
..T.-~~"'
-.x
- ~ - -
. :-~..
..-- a a m w ": :*? - '
13 (C-3) i udAUTY AUDIT FIF 3
=.....
10/16/73
~
e3 LJ
'pg,,n,
,m,-.......,..u.
Construction D =.. =
G. Richardson
-.... 20 - Midlan_d
- 72..
Qu_ality Control Files Al Albert, H. Foster o
,m,.m..............................u.
FR L_G 1. Para. 6.D
.,....1 Th2 specified forms which are an integral part of the procedures are mandatory.
The 6.1 "The test / data form exhibited in the Forns S,'.etion of the FM are also mandatory.
application of these forms will be identified in the inspection plans."
6.2 "The field may develop and use forns in addition to those prescribed.... Such fems vil not be substituted for forms indicated to be mandatory."
1.
Quality Control Forms Nos. QC-Cl4; QC-C5; QC-06; are not being used. The application of these forms are not identified in the inspection plans.
.E's
(
)
'i Inspection Flan Form QC-06-2a has been subctitiuted for form QC-G6-2 with out recuired changes to the FIM.
._....u......
- 1. Implement use of these forms in accordance with the FIM.
2.
Rsvise FIM w... m..............
['
11/16/13 (1) E. Felton (2) D. R. Johnson
_g O
'w.)
-. =
g...
E.-x.......................
-'=
3a
>==,
w;;;;-
3 I'
~
JAllTY AUDIT FINDING
'..C-*)
=
10/15/73
,o t
s v
g.,,,,
..T....
....,..........,..u..
MIDLAlm 7220 CONSTRUCTION O......
R. SO:OIERFEIa 7............
m.......
8 LINER PLATE ASSY AREA
[J. STOCKS w....u..................................
- 7220-C-111, 9.2.14 RT-XG-1, 6.2 (8)Allradiographicexaminationshallbedoneinaccordancewith....RT-XG-1,Rev.O.
(9) Film location and identification numbers shall be permanently marked on pipe or vessel....'
/
Film location and identification numbers are not permanently marked on liner plate assemblies.
O)
\\v
....e.v.......
1.
Request revision to 7220-C-111 to permit maintenance of written records of film locations.
- ~
11/16/73 E. E. Felton n
v me
-sz-sm.s k.- 9 4 Go.*4....
..v..,,
03 99
~
_M[
-e
~,,
3..,- y = --- - =.: = -.:.
CAUTY AUDIT FINDING
~
iC-*)
N_
10/16/73 e..
gg....
....,m........,....
MIDLAND 7220 CONSTRUCTION O -...
J. DOESON 9
h FIELD PROOURE ETT R. MATHE'JS
... m.......,..........................
FIM G-1 1.0
- m. n,.....
The prodedures in this nanual assign responsibilities and provide direction for the minimum inspection....of all construction activities affecting the pernanent plant.......
ERI's are being utilized in lieu of Inspection Plans but are not being procersed for any item other than "Q," Listed.
o I
\\
s
'%.J 1
I
\\
....m........
Obtain clarification defining applicability of inspection planning to Non "Q" items.
11/16/73 E. E. Felton
......~...........
m..
i.
)
y g'....
t,.;: m e:.........;...,...
- ~ ~
~
x w.. =
16 (C 2)
EV-udAUTY AUDIT RiiDliG 10/16/73 f]
( s' g,,,,.
u 3.,, a.......,.. u..
__M.R..L..AITD7220 CGTSTRUCTIO!T O....
R. SOIOIERFELD 7.
f ROD STORAGE ROOI C. EIIHEY 8
p..m...............................
VU40-1 REY. 10.
PARA. 2.5 & 3.1 (8) Para. 2.5 1: Filler materials for which all required documentation has been received, reviewed, and accepted shall be considered " certified".
Para. 2.5 2, 2.5 3, 2.5.h: Requires color coding of filler netals as certified by painted color code.
Para. 3.1: Upon receipt of filler metal, each container shall be inspected for damage.
Para. 3 3: Filler materials receiving reports shall be checked by SWE.... shall be rel ased for useage by SWE.
7,......
1.
Receiving reports not in 40 files for PO# 7220-F-5218, 5219, 5220.
2.}) ITo verification of acceptability of veld rod material prior to " certifying" by applicatio2 of paint.
Review of documents performed by QCE rather than SWE.,
One (1) lot of bare stainless steel wire type 308L, 3/32" arealloy heat 526193 not color coded as certified.
g_.............
2.})
1.
Receiving reports to be put in file PFQCE to issue instructions requiring review and acceptance of materials test reports prior to applying paint code.
3 M C-1 should be revised to shov QCE review and release.
h.,
Color coding to be applied after checking certifications.
1115_L73 E. E. Felton
.,m.u............
1 completed 10/16/73 2.
completed 10/16/73 SWE to review documentation
.)
completed 10/16/73
~~
y,w.w....
= " " "
g..
p#.
3,s.rf.1.Tr. -
ei II)ci!
JUAUTY AUDIT FINDING 17 (C-2) 10/15/73 gg...,.
MIDL!JTD 7220 CONSTRUCTION C o-
R. SO:G3FELD p....,.-
8 QC SECTION J. STOCKS /C. KE"7EY 7220-C-111, FARA. 10.2 FE4 G-1, 6.1, 6.2; FORM QC-011
- (
Documentation requirements shall be maintained in accordance with the procedures and forms outlined in Bechtel Field Inspection Manual.
(9)
"The test / data forms...are also mandatory."
The field may develop and use forms in addition to those prescribed by the fed...
Such forms vill not be substituted for forms indicated to be mandatory.
.,.1...
1.
Records of inspectica of liner plate are being maintained on field prepared '.irollout" dwg. (FSK-C34) 2.
A TWX from D. R. Johnson, Chief Field QCE, authorizes substitution of the " rollout" d.rg.
Mtled " Liner Flate Fabrication ITDE Control." This is in conflict with FIM G-1, 6.2 quoted
(
s
,ve.
L-
^
1 Amend FBI G-1 to permit substitution of field prepared forms for ma:tiatory forms after r; view and approval b3 chief field quality control engineer.
g..............
....................u.........
11/26/73 D.
R.
Johnson, CFQCE p.u..............
\\
-)
y,.....:c...
y=c.........w...,...
n:::~ ~^"
QUAUTY AUDIT FINDING-28C-2)
~
10/15/73
,m
\\
I
)
\\ J
- g..,.
- MIDLAND 7220 CONSTRUCTION g.,,...
- J. DOTSON/R. SO:C E <
1 QC OFFICE O. KII* Tf FIM G-1; 3.8 (8) The PFQCE's reporting relationship is shown in fi6ure 1 contained in the Project Special Provision Section of the QC Notices Manual.
4 j
The Project Special Provision section of the QC Notices Manual dos.: not contain figure 1.
f'\\
\\j 1.
Inse:t blank fig re i stating "in preparation"; or 2
Insert missing figure 1.
11/16/73
D. R. Johnson, CFQCE
~
t1
\\'
v) w_q g,......__.....
~ ~.% 3 6== * '*
s n.....r.a=............
O
..v.
. -w--
......a..
19 (C-2)
$JAUTY AUDIT FINDING
. ' $' V s......
10/16/73 m_ _
t.....
-- m.., c........ u.. u..
riidland 7220 Construction
[].....
R. So:::=erfeld
~.........
5 2
Construction O'~ ice J. Newgen/C. Kinney j.......
......m................................
- NQAM, SECTION V No. 2, Para. 2, 3.2, Attach. A
[ BQCM - AS1E SECTION I,1.4.3.e
" (8)
" Responsibility for.
. distribution of... various supporting manuals is shown on attachment "A"
" copies shall be loaned to those who '
.A them" Attcchment A established responsibility for distribution and control to Quality As:urence.
(9)
"Each Project Superintendent (7 copies) to be.
QA organi::ation has not distributed Bechtel Quality Control Manual - AS12 to Project Superintendent. Manuals requested by construction in July, 1973.
O, i
a N/I
..s...........
QA to expedite issue of 7 copies of BQCM - ASME to Project S'uperintendent.
A 11/.; /73 W. S. Gibbons
.x.........
n I
l t
Ks e-*mh 4M
.:r. a c a...
i.
[y,M h...
..g
. =.. -
, p c.,,;,i,g.;,. - - - " - - - - =
Eh. '.
JAUTY AllDIT FINDING
^
20 cC-2) 10/17/73 l
q pg,,,,.
u v2.,. t........,.. u..
Midland 7220 Construction 0.-
J. Dotson 9
Quality Control E. Felton, Z. Tucker n.. u.................................
NQAM Section 1 Number 9d m.>.,,,..
l Quality Control Engineers and technicians initiate and verify corrective action.
1 1
l 1
I i
l The FIM Procedure G-3 needs further definition of the QC Engineer's responsibilities in non-conformance reporting and verifying corrective action.
,r3 l
v Pr; vide (.. arification of Procedure G-3.
..... u..
.u........
11/16/73 D. R. Johnson
.,,- n,.....,,..,....
)
i l
,a i
)
m 1
- e.._, m
'W.WA*.4'f4.....W..,,4..
3,...
OI-
q_
5..
= -
y b-QUAUTY AUDIT FINDING 21(C-2) 1 10/18/73
. M.
g e s.
g....
Midland 7220 Conntraction C===
G. Houlton
.....m......
5 18
'riela Engineering
' pat nichols FIM G-2 Rev. 3 Para. h.1 andJ._3 7.....,
14 1 A DCN will be issued in accord with engineering drawing control procedures and will be treated as a drawing transnittal covered by paragraphs 31, 3.2, and 3 3 of this procedure.
3.3.1.1 New drawings or-revisions fron Project Engineering, after being logged, shall be distributed by the Print Coordinator / Clerk to..... voiding the old revisions per paragraph
)
5.0 of this procedure.
Nota:
DCU Drawing Change Notice l
Two distributed prints of 7220-C-132 rev 3 were located in the survey group (file and track) with no indication on the subject drawings that DCN # 2 had been issued. This DCN was also ncl available in the survey group.
fs!v)
..w.....w....e.
Correct existing discrepancies and review remaining DCNS for procedure ce=pliance.
11/5/73 E. E. Felton I
\\w
, g...
.w,;a........ w.......
~~~~
p-d$yl QUAllTY AUDIT FINDR'G
~
- 'C~*)
10/15/73
,n 9
\\
/
j.d e.,.........,... u.
...n,....,
pg,,,,
Midland 7220 Construction O... -
G. noulton 3
11 Field Enr:ineering Pat Nichols
....u.................................
FIM G-2 Rev. 3 Para. 3.3.2.2
.h
" Drawing distribution shall be individually determined by the Project Field Engineer and noted on the dra. ting control card."
~
Vendor drawing distribution is detemined by the Print Coordinator / Clerk,
()S L
Vendor drawing distribution should be determined by the Project Field Engineer and identified on drawing control cards.
~"
11/16/73 E. E. Felton
~
s
/
v
.g......u...
........n..................
-~ ~"
$ NT&4v........r.n;.rr.
- - - ~ "
..f.- ~ ~~ ~
gn m
w s
p,a.#..- - -.=z 5dD/ '
JI!.UTY AUDIT RUDING 2j,,,,(C-2)
~
10/17/73
.\\
I
~ tid.e:.rn.rr...
- p.... ;.,
g....
J.,.Iidland 7220 Construction C ** * '* *
.........M.a.u..lt on G.
5 21 Pield Enrineering Pnt Minhn1m PE4 G-2 Rev. 3 Para. 5.1 & 7.3.3 5.1 "The Print Coordinator / Clerk shall assure that superseded drawings are withdrawn from use.
Tha rasponsible personnel shall exchange the old drawing for the new revision.and if the old drawing is to be retained it shall be marked VOID."
7 3 3 5 ae Print Coordinator / Clerk shall ascertain withdrawal from use of superseded cpecifications by application of paragraph 5.0 of this procedure.
5.1 certain superseded drawings have no't been withdrawn from use'in the survey group.
~
v 7 3 3 The Print Coordinator / Clerk does not verify that superseded specifications are withdravr from use in the QC group.
Tha. Print Coordinator / Clerk should be instructed to verify the withdrawal from use of super-esded drawings and specifications in accordance uith paragraph 5.0.
E.' E. Felton 11/16/73 k
n m
- - - ~~
7,......mn.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "
T=::Tr::Tr:;'...
c...,...
is-
[in.tM. ~
udAl.lTY AUDIT FitSilG T.,..7, r w,.
~
~ ~ - "
's 24 (C-2)
'/
10/18/73 m
-l
=
g...,.
.m.,..........,......
Midirnd 7220 Construction g.....
G. Moulton
.....m.
3 24 Fic.1d Engineering Pat Nichols FlM G-_2, Rev. 3, Para. 6.1
. "Tha Print Coordinator / Clerk shall check the field drawing log against the Drawing Control R:gister to assure that the latest drawi.gs have been received and inform the Project Field Enginner of any omissions or discrepancies."
7,.
Saa Attached Sheet n
J w/
5., c..........
A review of the vendor drawing card file and vendor drawings against the vendor print ccntrol register should be made. Alldiscrepancies should be resolved.
...................u,,........,
"11/16/73 E. E. Felton
)
trmeiu...
.m.ir.......................
?f.2,,.....................
- = = ~ - =
-;a, 9Ne w. &
--e.
Nm wmew en w e
,:.,a s
OV ATTACIDENT-TO QUALITY AUDIT FINDING 24 (C-2)
FINDING:
The followi g' discrepancies were found in vendor drawing control system:
}
1.
The engineering vendor print control register lists drawing M 1.0-2-0 but there is no listing for this drawit.g in the card file and no drawing in the control
~
vendor print file.
2.
The ent,ineering vendor print control register lists drawing M 1.03-3-3, the card file lists revision 2 and the drawing was not in the file.
3.
The vendor print control register lists drawing M 1.0-4 Revision 3 the card file lists revision 2 and revision 2 was found in the file.
4.
The vendor print control register lists drawing M 1.0-6-3 and indicates it has been superseded by M 1.0- 38-2.
O
M.1.0-6-2 was found in the file with no indication of its superseded status.
5.
The vendor print control register lists drawing M 1.0-10-4 and indicates it has been superseded by M 1.0-45-1.
M 1.0-10-4 was found in the file with no indication of its supersede:d status,.
O
j.g.wu=wun l
a,,
's':.
JAllTY AUDIT FINDING t.....u. P 2' 10/18/73 c
t
}
- s. a...............
m....
Midland 7220 Construction G. Moulton a
- =
...n....
5 28
' Field Engineering Pat Nichols o
GIM G-2, Rev. 3, Para. 7.3.2
.D "A copy of outdated specifications or procedurec may be retained in a separate file ist future job site reference and shall be marked void."
Tha following superseded specifications were found in the control specification file:
C-25, C-30, C-31, C-32 and C-55.
These specifications have been superseded by the
'following:
C-225, C-230, C-231, C-232, and C-255 respectively.
The cards in the card file e-m not marked void with the exception of C-32.
(a I
l 1
....m.........
A review of the specification card file and specifications against the Requisition, Spacification and Addenda Register should be made. Alldiscrepancies should be resolved.
i l
11/16/73 E. E. Felton
.,.o u...............
b) v o 6 av.:.m..
.nc h p.v..w.w.w.
....w..
p:.u...:-
- n#. * ^if0 -
26 (C-2) dv.
udAl.lTY AUDIT FliiDil!G
~
10/18/73
~
o V '.
z ;.. c. a.........
p......;.;,
- 99.....
J. Dotson Midland 7220 Conctruction
==
.i...........
2 Construction site O. Kinney FIM 3.h A
'*- The Chief Field Quality Control Engineer prepares and naintains the Field Inspection Manual
~
(FIM).
Indoctrination and Training of RC personnel provisions notice. identifiedasSF/ PSP #3 1
andSF/ PSP #2(Seeattachedcoversheets)BothissuedforuseonMidland.
.m fV)
DaterminecorrectSF/PSPandrecallonenotapplicable.
!.1................
11/16/73 D. R. Johnson D
l (v
_ __.m.
m..*........
,,.....m.....................
-m6 Gemm...............
.a'=
e s'
Bechtel PowerCorporation
~
(j')
Interoffico Memorandum t
T.
.J. Connolly os.
January 28, 1974 susjea Job 7220 11idland Project rrom L. Carter J NCR No. 47 P0 7220-C-50A or Field Procurement
/
ceps.W J. Brush Ai Midland, Michigan P0 File Attached is a letter from the Vendor indicating the correct slab number to be used on part I!o. S2-G-U-2.
This information should be entered in box Ho. 21 on the Monconformance Report.
/
)
/
r=ld L )
/ ~..
L '! '
s-
'.?*,
,~
3lV C'L. Carter N 1
Material Coordinator 9
0 9
4 4
6
/**g g
} L-l l
l e
4 4
e
SOUUEEmr Eczzn S Tm Won:s, mc.
MAf4UFACTURERS OF CAR 00fd STEEL. i.LUMttJUM & STAlf4LESS STCCL TAtJKS, PRESSURE VCSSELS Af40 FAGHICATORS OF Pt ATE STEEL e
/
M00 527 7371 e193 THOMAS STRtti
/oh.,
- p. o. son 7274. McHen 3, T[N N. 3 010 7 j
e..!g.;:...)
4./
/
January 25, 1974 11cchtc1 Power Co.
P.O.11ox 2167 111dland, !!ich. 48640 Attention: Mr. Lcc Carter Centleracn:
In responce to our telephone conversation with Mr. Lee Carter, we have checked cur files on shall liner plate material 2S-2-6.
)
Our investigation indicates that the correct heat nutiber chould read 517Z1292, cerial nutaber Z97014 This letter will cerve as your authority to re-stencil this particular shc11 liner panel accordingly.
Sincerely, SOUTUC2N DOILER & TANK UCRKS, II:C.
f h ).b-l (ywDt ek 3{A%9 Robert L. Strong Chief Engineer RLS :dh 6
D i
!m-h ij e
c.Q'.*p
=
oy c
' ~
NONCCNFORMANCE REPORT g
h7 we, w w -- ~
-__n
.-(pp.---
- 2. Det A u SNG /PA 34 T NO.
$ R E V.
- 7. PN OJ CCT NO.
32 HE(Of v
DATE
- 25. DILPossT80N CONCUH NENCE Ox/; / _. w.
i/ m -74 S2-6-u-2 i
722o
-~-
1 ITEM DLSCRIPTION
E DATE
_IIppetLinetPlate Liner Plate Ase_embly.. Area
\\i.
'Y E0bb,b[ ~
!I~2 ' N
- 4. G L H ! A L F4 GM L.L 3
- 9. ST AN TUP GYSTLM NO.
5.HEPLACEMENT PSHf NO.
hs V.
'"on cv c este a n.e== s e uava
%/
_Se2.Bl o_ck _19.
D. Pu e :CH ASC Of f DER NO.
._UA IIA I
o,.c..
o...
- 10. GC rIELD INSPECTION PLAN NO.
- 16. NLPLACEMENT SERI AL NO.
_7220-c-50A c-111-37
- 6. C O N I ' ACTOis/ LOC AYBON g 3, A;;Ag
- '"***#E
'"'*8C'**
CODE
.- Southern. Boil _er_&.T..a.nk Wor.ks / Memuh..i_s_ o.Tenn.
Tert CD NO Vendor a s. rou Tar.d sasTwuCTiONc:
~
O "o u 's 'O r 'c'u 'N c 'a =' a 'r c-G NOu rc.'o M ATEa AL suPENvisOR i 2. eu.Corros.umo coNoi-.ON Mj_ll _qtJtrycLpl ab_numbRr_i n_Z-97_03 h.
Shor) ctosped clab number _is Z-9701h.
I)ocumentation _ seems to authenticate the chop stamped number.
\\
d,/.. /,1
(~t
'QFIELD ossPoSITION
['\\' FICLO REbOMM EN D ATION/RO UTE TO PRO JECT ENG SN EE RING f
23.
- 21. FIE LD DISPost?r*N RESULTS:
Field Material Coordinator will contact Vendor Attached letter from Souther!
and will follow up for positive identification in Boiler & Tank Works, dated Jc writing of correct sIab number, This wiii be furnished 25,1974 is authority to re-to PFE and documented in B!ock 2I.
M A
stencil correct Slab Humber k0ANASL b I-Y D Y Z-9701h.{k.
' '. ' /- V i
2 2. EhGINC E HING DISPOSITION
/
2 3. ENGIN EERING DISPOSITION RESULTS:
4 25 "c'Ec'E
" ^' E a ' ^ ' o '5 "c 5 O "
0"*""'*****"*"
- 27. OC ACCEPTANCE 2% B S DEEIGN CH At4GE REQUIRE ONO U""
O vCS. SEE AvrACNEo, oc==......
OR AWING R E V.
DCN avvoso.eano anspectee e.,g
[PEC.
REV.
A D D.
[ $ ;!$ f f
-:T[D
"^ **
- * * " " ~
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l
OF 1
h8
/
- 2. f),*.*yyG/PA rt T NO.
tREV.
- 7. PR O J C CT NO.
- 12. R EPO R CD Y DATC
- 25. DISPOSITION CONCU N H CNCC Sh-2-U-1 & S3-1-U-1 7220 PM 7 A r> /-4/-74
" ~ ^ " '
~
I
- 3. BT CIA OCSC RIPTION S. IT LM LOCATIO N
- 91. VA LID ATCD D V DATE
_Leck chace channel Liner Plate Assembly Area
'5v_.y rdN/-
!l'.2I'7[
- 4. SC H & A L N U M U C ~d
- 9. ST A ft T UP SYSTCM NO.
I 1.. h C PL'A'C L M E N T mRT NO.
R EV.
- n ok.CT P oe t. t he tas..
.att la ns_
u n
- 3. PURCH ASC OHC R NO.
3 0. C C FIELD IN SPCCTION PLA N NO.
S E. REPLACEMEN T SCRI AL NO.
EA C-111-11 I?A 6 CONTR A C10N/ LOC ATION 33.ASMC Q YES
$ 7. SOURCC COOC KA IT c u El NO Construction l a. HOUTING INSTR UCTIONSt Q ROUTE TO FIELD ENGINEERING O ROUTC TO M ATERI AL SUPCRVISOR 9 3. NONCON P O RMING Co rd DITION: Duri.DS_prrqcrur_q _dacect tenting _c f__the l ort _ chare _.ryaten attached by +bo Ni a n i n
- ua n discovered on the left side between elevations 623' and 633'.
Ilepair to the veld was not do;te in accora,nnn with specification 7220-C-111, i.e., the area was not ground out before repair veld was made.
20.
O F8CLD DISPOSITsON
@FECLO HECOMMEND ATION/ROUTC TO PROJCCT ENGINEERING 2 3. FICLO OSSPOSITION RESULTSt Use as is.The specific area of repair is not discernabic at this time.
The small pin hole leak was repaired by cler.ning the slag from the weld and adding a second pass of filler metal over the area, as is done for any two pass weld.
After the repair, the leak chase system pass the 80 lb. Pressure Decay Test.
()
h 75-74
(
MMw
/- 7 $ -7 [
- 22. ENGIN CC HING DISPOS 8 TION 4,)
2 3. ENGINEER ONG OsSPCstTION RESULTS, k
U~~"~~"
- 20. sS oCStGN CH ANGC REQUIRE O NO O.e-a, O vES. Ste xTT4CNEo.
D;) AWING R E V.
OCN SPEC.
REV.
ADD.
nmral
(
"I
"I W to t* A C C 1 t o. NC R NC.
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 1
h9 OP n-wn..
- 2. CCD,*)p/P A R 7 N E.
eClV.
- 7. f*R OJ E CT N 3.
- 12. R E PO RT E D.sy DAT3
- 25. O BSPOSIT 80N CO NCUH R CNC:s R-12-L l
7220 (7/ d O k 3 __
i/-L/-/m
- ' - ~ -
I
- 3. BT EM DLSCRIPTSON
- 3. ITE M LOCATIO N t 3. V ALID AT ED DY y
DATE
~
Penetration Jig Building Q.j[ h fg d Q
!/-21-7Y C. Stif1 A L N UM DER
.W EPLA CEMENT PA N O.
R CV.
esose ct FeeLD E ****se e n
- *eA v e R-12-L HA UA J
3 0. QC rlELD INSPECTION PLAN NO.
5 6. R EPLACEMENT,$CR f AL NO.
7220-C-50A C-111-16 UA
-=ac'"'='a===~~~==
- '=
- 17. SO U R C E a
a ce ente CODE 1TA D. NO C_onstru,cti__on
,T E u 9 0. R TJ UTING $N STR UCTION Sa Q RO UT E TO FICt.D ENGIN EE R $NG O 840UTE TO M ATERI AL SUPERVISOR SO. NONCONFORMING CONDITION: The veld gap between the penetration R-12-L and the liner plate ascombly S1-1-U-2 is 5/8" which is in excess of the 1/2" reap pemitted by specification 7220-C-111.
27.
O ric'o o85"osir'on Gr'c'o Rccomacno^ Tion /aouTE TO PROscCT ENGiNECRiNG 2i. riCLO oiSPOstr ON n ESULTS.
To une as is and make additional stringer passes between the 1A inch liner plate and the thickened liner plate.
This will fill the 5/8 root gap with properly applied wcld natcrial.
WYn..a_,
f ~~ 7:t,
.'l
..b
/ 2 +- 7J
^
2 3. ENGIN EERING D8SPOSITLON R ESU LTS:
- 22. CNGIN CC R 8NG DISPO SITION 1
2.*,. 85 DCStGN CH ANGC R EQUIRCD C NO
^
D caa.
Y ES, SCC ATT ACHEDs neuaneis oc uneeneen DR AWING R E V.
OCH avvponeses merecron_
emys m
SPCC.
R CV.
ADO.
mL QfR r
[
d u% ~
sL s
\\
/
.e zo 7f jtcf c tM 4,
{
Tu3 -BEAC / S R l
k
~
c i
L maxw ec c.
i e
I sA/' T m,A '
r
- x5 y s k a f* 4? d t -c"
% /2 /9; 7
i
{e
/4,c A '
Ie-p eM,
~
4 L_
l t
a C
y
/
f
(
/
c
)
=
r-i t.
4?
4
. a, I ",. c. l -
...,.. ^ p*
.4 1M
-... ~
i 9
e
- i.
q
.s
.._='j.
e
- -.. L.~,
- s.
- y -
.. - ;, -. n. n
~.
.o s
. r.'
1 g.
II 4
~_.
e 4
d. -i N -
, _. -,,......E-
...w,
,_.,..,,-,m.--.w.-m
,,,p.,w,.y.,,,,,.,._w,_,,,m
..w.,n,-
my-mc,,,,y,.3w.
,,39.g.,.,7-,